Juno News - December 12, 2018
The True North Report: The Trudeau government signed the UN Global Compact on Migration.
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
178.91869
Summary
In this episode of the True North Initiative, Candice Malm talks about the growing call for Western Separatism in Canada and why it makes sense to separate Western Canada from the rest of the country. She also talks about Omar Khadr and his new plans to travel to Saudi Arabia.
Transcript
00:00:00.640
Hey guys, we are live. My name is Candice Malcolm with the True North Initiative. Thank
00:00:05.320
you so much for watching this Tuesday afternoon or evening, depending on where in the world
00:00:11.040
you are. There's a lot going on in the news today, as typical as usual, I guess, but you
00:00:16.400
know, it's December, you expect things to slow down a bit for Christmas, but not for
00:00:20.160
us. There is a lot of chatter and a lot of talk right now about the situation in Alberta,
00:00:26.360
this sort of new political realization or just, you know, this frustration that's bursting
00:00:33.660
at the seams. And it's like everywhere you look, you hear respectable people talking about
00:00:39.220
separation. Lawrence Solomon had a really solid piece in the National Post over the weekend,
00:00:45.120
talking about the economic argument behind Western separatism or Alberta separatism. Daniel
00:00:51.740
Smith and Brett Wilson had a really interesting conversation on the radio in Calgary about the
00:00:57.300
topic and going back to 1905 and discussions at the time of creating an independent republic
00:01:04.020
of Alberta and Saskatchewan that would be called Buffalo. And, you know, more and more places
00:01:10.740
that you look, you hear people talking about this. It's quite something, you know, it's almost
00:01:15.220
like no one wants to break apart Canada. And the subject was taboo for so long, you would
00:01:20.560
never hear, you know, mainstream respected people in the business community, writers,
00:01:25.820
politicians talking about this stuff. And suddenly here it is out in the open. And I think it's
00:01:29.360
just so much frustration over Eastern Canada, Western Central Canada, the attitude out of Quebec.
00:01:37.860
We learned that Alberta will not qualify for equalization payments this year, despite constantly paying
00:01:42.820
in, you know, they're in the middle of an economic crisis and recession. And yet, Quebec is still
00:01:48.580
receiving money, they're going to get about $1.5 billion this year. Alberta is not going to get
00:01:52.720
anything. And, you know, to add insult to injury, Quebec's premier said that there's no social
00:01:59.260
appetite for Alberta oil in Quebec, and that they don't want any of it, they don't want anything to do
00:02:03.340
with it. You know, Quebec is okay with importing blood oil from Saudi Arabia, they're okay with using oil,
00:02:09.940
they're okay with having refineries, they just don't want anything to do with Canadian oil, which is
00:02:14.660
quite the slap in the face, considering that Quebec takes, has taken over $200 billion from
00:02:21.380
equalization. So they're more than happy to spend money from oil, they're more than happy to spend
00:02:27.060
the money on social services that are above and beyond what any other Canadian gets, based on oil
00:02:33.300
revenues that get transferred mostly from Western Canada and Alberta to Quebec, but they don't want the
00:02:38.340
pipelines. And so, you know, someone's got to give it on top of that. You've got Justin Trudeau,
00:02:43.540
who openly talks about wanting to phase out the Canadian oil industry. He's helped landlock Alberta,
00:02:51.060
he's given them new options. And, you know, yeah, it's interesting times in Alberta. And I have a call
00:03:00.020
myself out in the Toronto Sun today, I tweeted that link out, I'll share it as well. And, yeah, talking just
00:03:07.700
about the frustration in Alberta, and this sort of back and forth is going on, that's not what I want
00:03:11.940
to talk about today. Just wanted to talk about that issue right off the bat, the main thing that's
00:03:16.900
happening in the world, I think, well, there's a couple of other things, you know, Omar Khadr,
00:03:21.620
as you might have seen, is now applying for a travel permit, he wants to go to Saudi Arabia to visit his
00:03:26.340
crazy terrorist family. You know, this is a guy that got $1.5 million from the Canadian government.
00:03:32.340
And part of the reason he was set free, and he was given this apology, and all this stuff, was that he swore
00:03:36.900
he was nothing like his family, who were all terrorists. Remember, his father was the top
00:03:41.620
ranking Al-Qaeda official that helped bankroll Sama bin Laden and 9-11. And, you know, the whole
00:03:47.780
family was basically brainwashed into this terrorist lifestyle. Well, Khadr promised that he was totally
00:03:54.340
different and wanted nothing to do with his family. And now he's saying that he wants to go to Saudi
00:03:59.460
Arabia to visit them. So that's pretty terrifying. And knowing Canada and knowing our bleeding heart system,
00:04:05.220
he'll probably be able to go with his fresh new payment of $1.5 million in his bank account,
00:04:11.860
what could possibly go wrong? Also, not what I wanted to talk about today, the main thing I want
00:04:16.900
to talk about is that this UN migrant compact is now signed. It is now a thing. Canada has signed it.
00:04:25.780
And I want to talk about, I know I've been doing a lot, I've been focusing a lot on this topic,
00:04:30.980
but I think there's still just, you know, issues that are not clear. I've noticed just tons of
00:04:37.940
criticism in the media towards myself, towards anyone who's taken a very public position against
00:04:43.620
this. Conservative leader in Canada, Andrew Scheer, said that the Conservatives opposed this idea,
00:04:49.940
and they opposed UN compact. And one of the reasons was because it would undermine Canadian
00:04:54.660
sovereignty. And when he made that argument, the liberals and the media just lost their minds and
00:05:00.820
started calling them a liar, saying that this was a myth that was pushed by the far right in Europe and
00:05:07.380
the alt-right in the United States. Alt-right is another term for white supremacist, racist, neo-Nazis.
00:05:16.980
So that's nice getting called alt-right by, you know, the liberal party itself. It couldn't be further
00:05:23.460
from the truth. So I wanted to talk exactly about how this compact undermines Canadian sovereignty.
00:05:30.980
And then one of the other criticisms that I've had, I've made a claim that the compact blurs the
00:05:35.940
distinction between a migrant and a refugee. In fact, that's what the entire point of this document
00:05:41.700
is. If you read it, that's what it's doing. It's trying to blur the lines, trying to create
00:05:46.020
a new class for migrants that basically mirrors the class that we have for refugees. So I'm going
00:05:52.260
to go over those two things and I'm going to explain exactly how this undermines our sovereignty and
00:05:57.140
exactly how this blurs the distinction between refugees and migrants. Okay. So in the preamble itself,
00:06:06.100
the preamble of this global compact, which was signed today, it was signed today. Let me note that
00:06:12.740
a lot of countries didn't sign it. Initially, a lot of the media reports were saying that only the
00:06:17.620
U.S. was not going to sign it. When they first wrote this thing in July, the U.S. was the only
00:06:22.180
country that didn't want any part of it right from the get go. They said no. So a lot of the media
00:06:26.900
stories in Canada were just sort of echoing that without doing any update research on the conversations
00:06:33.460
that have been happening around the world over the last six months or five months. And so they said,
00:06:38.100
oh, it's only the U.S. that's not signing this. It's not true. Scores of countries all over Europe,
00:06:44.100
Australia, New Zealand, Israel, you know, we're not only talking about countries that are supposedly
00:06:50.020
run by right-wing populist governments. Switzerland's not signing it. Denmark had concerns about signing
00:06:56.020
it. You know, New Zealand, Australia, we're not just talking about countries that are run by so-called
00:07:02.020
far-right strongmen. You know, there was a pretty broad consensus around the Western world that countries
00:07:06.980
didn't want to sign this. And then it was interesting. After I started pointing this out,
00:07:10.020
another started pointing this out, I saw another media story and said, oh, well, 85% of countries
00:07:15.380
in the world are signing this UN compact. It's like, who cares what 85% of countries, you know,
00:07:20.820
there's 160 somewhat countries in the UN. Most of them were just horrible garbage dictatorships
00:07:26.740
that have nothing to do with Canada. So why would I care whether those countries are signing the
00:07:30.900
compact? I want to know whether other Western countries, other democracies, other liberal democracies,
00:07:36.180
like Canada are signing it. And when you look into that, you realize, you know, a lot of Canada's
00:07:40.980
closest allies and most similar countries to us, like the United States, like Australia, those are
00:07:45.940
the people who pulled out. So anyways, let's get to the content here. So in, this is the compact here.
00:07:53.140
And in the preamble, this is a point that I raised over and over again. Number four. So, you know,
00:07:59.540
these are the, this is the stated purpose of this declaration of this whole compact. And right here,
00:08:07.220
it says, refugees and migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights and fundamental
00:08:13.140
freedoms, which must be respected, protected and fulfilled at all times. And so that's why I said,
00:08:19.060
you know, this document seeks to make migration a basic universal human right. And that's why it's
00:08:25.460
problematic. Someone criticized me, someone writing in the national post criticized me because the very
00:08:29.700
next line in the compact says, however, migrants and refugees are distinct groups governed by separate
00:08:35.220
legal frameworks. Only refugees are entitled to the specific international protection as defined by
00:08:41.140
international refugee law. So they were saying like, oh, you know, Candace was just talking about
00:08:45.780
how migrants and refugees have the same fundamental human rights. And she didn't include this part that
00:08:51.060
says, hey, there's two separate categories. So there's a category called refugees, and they have
00:08:55.700
their own set of laws that govern how they work and how countries have to treat them. And then there's
00:09:00.340
migrants and they have a separate framework saying that I didn't include that. Okay, well, let's go to the
00:09:05.140
next line after that. So the very next line says, this global compact refers to migrants and presents a
00:09:12.660
cooperative framework addressing migration in all its dimensions. Did you get that? So the whole point of
00:09:19.300
this UN compact is to create a new framework that governs migrants, that governs migrants. So we
00:09:25.380
already have a framework that governs how countries have to treat refugees, and I'll get to that later
00:09:30.420
in this talk. But this compact has to do with creating a new framework for how we treat migrants. And
00:09:37.940
then if you go through the actual objectives that they have, they have their 23 objectives that are here.
00:09:45.940
And then each one has like a long detailed explanation of what it does. If you read those objectives and
00:09:53.620
what they're doing, they're basically enshrining the same framework that we already have for refugees,
00:10:00.500
and applying that to migrants. So a lot of the exceptions to the rules that we have for refugees,
00:10:07.700
they're trying to make that framework for migrants. Okay, so that's the whole thing like, right now,
00:10:14.580
and this is how this is how this is how this new compact undermines Canadian sovereignty. So
00:10:20.180
right now, Canada sets its own immigration rules, it sets its own immigration rules, I've worked in the
00:10:24.660
immigration department, we have our own plan that we write every single year, Canada writes out a plan,
00:10:30.260
they table it before Parliament, it's based on, you know, all these widespread consultations,
00:10:35.140
and Canada decides, the Canadian government decides, this is how many people are going to enter Canada
00:10:40.260
this year, this is how many are going to enter next year, the following year, and then they keep
00:10:44.580
track of how many people left before. So there are three types of categories for immigration,
00:10:50.340
there's the economic class, there's family reunification class, and then there are refugees.
00:10:56.100
And so economic classes, if you get a job in Canada, you get a visa, you get to bring your entire
00:11:01.860
families. So say, you know, a dad of a family gets a job working in Canada, he gets a visa for himself,
00:11:08.340
a visa for his wife and his three kids, those are five visas, those are all under the economic class.
00:11:13.460
We have a separate class as family reunification for extended family, or that's for Canadians who
00:11:18.260
marry someone who is foreign, and then they can sponsor them to come into Canada. The third class is
00:11:23.460
our refugee class, which is, there's two different categories within that. So there's the government
00:11:28.900
sponsored programs, where we work with the United Nations, and get referred refugees and bring those
00:11:33.060
over through the government. And then we also have our private program, so you can privately sponsor
00:11:37.540
refugees through your church, through a charity, or through any individual group, they come together,
00:11:42.980
and you bring the refugee in. So that's, that's our legal framework, that's how you can legally come to
00:11:47.860
Canada. But then, because we have a special framework for refugees, refugees don't have to follow that
00:11:55.780
guideline necessarily. If you are a refugee, and there's a couple of UN trees that outline this,
00:12:00.740
there's a 1951 Refugee Convention, and then there's a 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees.
00:12:09.300
So those are two different international agreements that we've signed in the past, that say refugees get
00:12:15.700
to be treated separately. Essentially, refugees don't have to follow a country's immigration rules. Like,
00:12:22.340
if you, if you are a refugee, you want to come to Canada, you don't have to apply and come legally
00:12:27.300
through one of those two, one of those three streams. There's literally, there's the, there's,
00:12:33.860
there's a law that allows you, so say you're a refugee, all you have to do is step foot on Canadian soil,
00:12:40.340
throw your hands in the air, present yourself to a Canadian agent, a Canadian official at an airport,
00:12:46.820
or at a port of entry, or at any immigration office where there's a Canadian federal immigration
00:12:51.780
official. And you just put your hands in the air and say, I'm a refugee. And then, because Canada's
00:12:57.300
signed on to these treaties, because we've ratified these treaties in 1951, the 1967 one, we, Canadians,
00:13:04.100
don't have a say as to whether this person gets to stay in our country or not. We have to treat their
00:13:09.460
case as if it's real. So that's how refugees already have a legal exception to our immigration rules.
00:13:15.540
As long as they say they're a refugee, we have to treat their case as if there's merit to it. So
00:13:21.220
then they apply, they get to put forth their application, they get to appear before judges,
00:13:27.060
they get all kinds of rights. They basically, the entire Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
00:13:31.780
applies to that person, because they say that they are a refugee. And now the judge could find that,
00:13:37.860
hey, this person's lying, hey, this person is not an actual refugee, they're not who they say they are,
00:13:44.020
and we can reject their case, at which point we can try to deport them. But basically, if as long
00:13:50.500
as you say you're a refugee, you can break Canadian law, not only break our immigration law by applying
00:13:56.100
outside that legal system that I explained, but also, you know, we overlook the fact that you might have
00:14:01.460
crossed the border illegally to get into Canada, you might have used a fake or falsified passport to get
00:14:07.540
into Canada, we kind of look the other way and say it's okay that you broke the law, because you are
00:14:13.620
here and you're claiming to be a refugee, we have to treat you like a refugee. Oh, and also because
00:14:18.420
it's Canada, they get access to all kinds of gold plated welfare, they get welfare, and specifically
00:14:23.540
health care programs above and beyond what Canadians receive. And so this is this is already a way in which
00:14:32.500
the UN has undermined Canadian sovereignty, because Canada doesn't get to say, wait a minute, you're
00:14:38.660
not a refugee, like get out of here. No, you don't get to stay, we don't get to say like, oh, wait a minute,
00:14:43.860
you know, there's all these red flags on your file, you have to go. No, we have to treat these people
00:14:50.340
as if their case is legitimate. And so that undermines our sovereignty, that undermines our ability to set
00:14:56.180
our own immigration system. Now, what this UN and that's existing, that's thanks to those old treaties.
00:15:02.660
And when I worked in government, it was a frustration, because, you know, a lot of times you have people
00:15:09.060
who come to Canada that are clearly not refugees. I'll give you an example. When I was working in
00:15:13.780
government in 2012, the number one source country of people filing asylum claims. If you had to guess,
00:15:22.020
what would you, what would you guess? You'd probably guess maybe it would be Mexico or China,
00:15:27.460
some country that has like a really brutal human rights record, right? You know, the number one
00:15:31.380
source country of people coming to Canada and filing asylum claims at the time was Romania,
00:15:37.300
a European country. And so, you know, there's just obvious scams, there's obvious, obvious,
00:15:43.540
you know, human smuggling rings and groups of people who take advantage of Canada's generosity and
00:15:48.260
or signing of these previous UN declarations. And so the point is that this new one, this 2018
00:15:56.740
migrant compact, seeks to create that same kind of framework and apply it to all migrants. So not
00:16:03.060
people who fit a very specific legal definition of a refugee, which is someone who is fleeing war,
00:16:08.580
or who faces a well found persecution, a well found fear of persecution from the government based on their
00:16:15.220
race or their religion or their creed. So instead of refuge, instead of only a small group of people
00:16:21.700
getting these exceptions and getting this special treatment from the government, well, they want to
00:16:26.580
apply those same exceptions and the same rules and the same entitlements to everyone, essentially. And that's
00:16:34.580
what the document itself lays out when those 23 objectives that you know, it talks about, yeah, sure,
00:16:41.540
some of the stuff is not terrible. It talks about how we should track, you know, do a better job of
00:16:47.460
tracking, you know, with census data, to see how these migrants are doing in the future. We should make
00:16:54.420
sure that everyone has legal identification, blah, blah, blah. Yeah, there's some stuff in here that's not
00:16:59.860
completely terrible. But, you know, if you look at the outline of what it's talking about, the various steps
00:17:06.580
and pathways and, you know, entitlements and making sure that they have access to the same things and
00:17:12.180
that they get to sponsor their family members over the same way, it's taking all the tenants of the
00:17:17.380
special status that we give to refugees, where we allow them to break our law, and trying to apply that
00:17:22.820
to a broad group of people, which basically just says, okay, it's no longer just a small group of
00:17:28.500
people who claim to be refugees, who get to have an exception to Canadian law, and they operate outside. So
00:17:34.820
every year when Canada tables this immigration plan saying, we're going to let in 330,000 people
00:17:40.020
into the country this year, these asylum seekers don't count in those numbers, they're separate.
00:17:44.580
And the Trudeau government repeats that to say, oh, you know, these asylum seekers aren't jumping the
00:17:49.620
queue, they're not coming to the front of the line, because no matter what, we're still going to welcome
00:17:53.940
in our 330, as we stated. But these people just come in addition. So, you know, it's still an additional
00:18:00.900
cost to taxpayers, it's still an additional burden on our agencies and our, you know, people who work
00:18:06.660
for refugees, not to mention, you know, the welfare state, and lack of housing, and health care, and
00:18:12.420
education, all this kind of stuff that is impacted. And so, you know, that's, that's, that's how this
00:18:20.260
framework could impact. And so then the argument they'll make is, oh, well, it's not binding, it's not
00:18:25.700
legally binding, it's not like a treaty that gets ratified, and then it becomes Canadian law.
00:18:30.740
Well, no, that's not true. But the whole idea behind having this international document that
00:18:34.980
Canada has signed, is that it will be used, and it will be referenced in Canadian courts.
00:18:40.820
So say, there is an individual who is a migrant, they're not a refugee, they're, they're just a
00:18:47.140
migrant, they're a person who came from, let's just take a country, Honduras, who wasn't necessarily
00:18:52.420
fleeing persecution or war, they just wanted a better economic outcome in Canada. And so they
00:18:59.380
get to follow the same guideline, say they apply for refugee status, and their case gets rejected,
00:19:04.980
well, they can appeal that. And in the appeals case, they can point to the UN migration compact
00:19:11.860
that shows how migrants get all the same access and special privileges and treatment and how, you know,
00:19:18.180
Canada has to take the case seriously, that the UN compact could be quoted, could be mentioned,
00:19:23.540
could be used in that court case, and the judge could rule in favour of letting this individual
00:19:28.260
stay in the country. So that will be a very specific example of how the UN document will be used to
00:19:33.460
undermine Canadian sovereignty, because the Canadian government is saying, we want this person out of
00:19:37.220
the country, they look to the UN document, they use that, a judge overturns it, and they get to stay in
00:19:43.140
our country against the will of the government against the will of the people. And you know,
00:19:47.380
it's so interesting, because, again, Andrew Scheer got called a far right racist, essentially,
00:19:53.860
for saying that this agreement undermines Canadian sovereignty. But that's basically the argument that
00:19:59.140
all the countries are pulling out have been making. This is from an Australian paper about Minister
00:20:05.460
Dutton, who's their Minister of Home Affairs, which is sort of the equivalent of the Minister of Public
00:20:11.220
Safety in Canada, or the Department of Homeland Security in the US. And here it says, Dutton says,
00:20:17.460
Australia won't surrender our sovereignty by signing the United Nations deal. And interestingly, I mean,
00:20:25.860
you know, they were making this argument back in July, that that story came out in July. So as soon as
00:20:32.500
this document surfaced, the Australian government was like, absolutely no way. And yet in Canada, we didn't
00:20:38.500
even really start to have this conversation until like a few weeks ago. I mean, I know that there was
00:20:42.340
a petition going around, and Maxime Bernier, the People's Party had been the sponsor. I think I first
00:20:49.300
saw that about a month ago, but Canada really didn't have a full discussion. We didn't have a public debate
00:20:54.420
on this, like they were having in other countries. And I think that's such a disservice. As soon as we start
00:21:00.180
to raise the issue, myself, a couple of other columnists in the country, and then politicians,
00:21:05.620
you had Michelle Rumpel, Maxime Bernier, and Andrew Scheer, three kind of heavyweights, all
00:21:11.060
criticizing this agreement. And they were completely written off, like all the media stories that I saw,
00:21:16.180
all the headlines across the spectrum, if there is even a spectrum in Canadian media. But you know,
00:21:21.700
you had Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, National Post, iPolitics, CTV, Global, all of them repeating the
00:21:31.220
exact same thing. Experts say this is not binding. Experts say this won't undermine Canadian sovereignty.
00:21:37.700
Experts say this won't blur the line between migrants and refugees. It's like, we're not allowed
00:21:42.660
to have a discussion about it. They just tell us what our opinion has to be. And they expect us to move
00:21:47.940
on. And then you get the bullying and the name calling from Trudeau's sort of top inner circle,
00:21:53.060
the immigration minister himself, Trudeau's top aide, Gerald Butts. And Trudeau himself saying that,
00:21:59.860
you know, if you oppose this, you're just peddling conspiracy theories. Basically, he said
00:22:03.940
that Scheer was taking his talking points from rebel media. Well, actually, rebel media has done a pretty
00:22:10.180
good job of covering this. Ezra Levant did a whole hour last week where he went point by point through the
00:22:17.220
document and discussed his concerns with each one. Ezra's a lawyer, he understands these documents,
00:22:23.780
and he really spelt it out. And I think that the points that he raised individually going through
00:22:28.980
the text talks to the same kind of thing that I am, that the document is written to provide all of
00:22:35.700
these special treatment, all the special privileges for migrants, not refugees, but for migrants. And
00:22:41.220
that's the concern. It's such a shame in Canada that we did not get to have a public debate about
00:22:48.180
this. We didn't have a conversation. We weren't really consulted. It was just kind of like,
00:22:52.100
hey, this is happening. Canada is so excited about it. Look at this leadership role we're playing.
00:22:58.420
And then anyone who disagrees is written off as a racist or a far right figure. And I think that's
00:23:06.660
sad. I think it shows that, you know, the situation in Canada was we don't really have the ability to
00:23:13.460
have a public debate. We're not allowed to have intellectual conversations. We're not allowed to
00:23:18.180
debate ideas without fear of just getting called all kinds of horrible names by the top-ranking people
00:23:25.060
in the country, either through the media or in politics. You know, if you are critical of this,
00:23:31.060
like I was, you get your name, you know, smeared in the press. If you're Andrew Scheer, the leader of
00:23:36.740
a political party, you know, he's been hearing from Canadians all over the country with their concerns
00:23:41.540
about this. He voices his concern. And he gets called, you know, far right, alt right, yada, yada,
00:23:48.260
yada, all the stuff that they always throw at you if you have any criticism of their dogma on
00:23:56.740
immigration and diversity and multiculturalism. And so another thing I want to point out,
00:24:02.420
which was interesting, so New Zealand, I'm not actually sure if New Zealand signed this document
00:24:07.460
or not. The most recent thing that I saw was just reading like New Zealand newspapers from yesterday
00:24:14.900
and today, and it was like everything was still unsure that they're trying to delay their vote
00:24:19.860
and that they're not, they're not sure whether or not they're going to sign it. It's interesting,
00:24:24.500
again, you know, you look at the news down in New Zealand. This is from Radio NZ. The title says,
00:24:31.060
Sovereignty concerns Schroed NZ's bid to sign UN Migrant Pact. So, you know, exactly the same kind
00:24:38.340
of concerns about sovereignty, yet somehow if you say that in Canada, it's because you're just a horrible
00:24:43.780
person. But basically, the National Party in New Zealand opposed the compact, and this is what they
00:24:50.740
said. They said that we don't need to be told by the UN what to do, and that this pact treats illegal
00:24:58.340
and legal migrants the same. And so that's basically the point that I'm making is that
00:25:06.900
there's already a distinction carved out of our law to accommodate refugees, and this migration compact
00:25:13.700
seeks to carve out an even greater hole from our immigration system for illegal. People who come
00:25:21.620
to Canada crossing the border illegally at Roxham Road entering illegally, people who show up with
00:25:27.380
fake or falsified passports, and they just want to stay in Canada. Well, the global compact spells out
00:25:33.140
all these things that they get, all these extra rights and all these extra privileges. And as I've
00:25:37.620
noted before, you know, the entire compact and this entire conversation, the major problem, the reason
00:25:42.660
people hate this stuff, and they oppose it, is because it doesn't recognize the rights or the
00:25:48.500
sovereignty of the Canadian people. Everything in this document is about rights and privileges for
00:25:54.340
migrants. Well, what about the rights and the privileges of Canadian citizens? What about our culture,
00:26:00.660
our values? You know, what about our communities? What's this going to do if Canada sends a signal that,
00:26:06.500
hey, open illegal migration is now okay with us and there's like a framework to accommodate it? You
00:26:12.420
know, what's this going to do to our cities, to our roads, to already heavily congested morning commutes,
00:26:18.660
or public transit? What about schools? What about housing, hospitals? Like, why doesn't it even acknowledge
00:26:25.380
the problems that could exist? You know, and this isn't getting into any of the problems when it comes to
00:26:30.820
the Orwellian Objective 17, which I've gone into a lot in the past. You can check out some of my older
00:26:36.100
videos on that, which is about how it wants to create basically, it wants to sensitize and educate
00:26:44.500
journalists. It wants to promote media outlets that have positive things to say about migrants,
00:26:50.420
and then like cut off and exclude outlets that perpetuate intolerance. You know, forget about all
00:26:58.420
that creepy Orwellian language, which should disqualify the entire document to begin with,
00:27:03.300
even if we ignore the worst parts of it. And we look at the substance of this compact and what
00:27:08.260
it's supposed to be doing. Well, it's still, you know, incredibly terrible for Canada. And if you
00:27:16.020
live in New Zealand, you can say that. If you live in Australia, you get to have a four month public
00:27:20.340
debate about that and ultimately come to the conclusion that you don't want to sign this treaty.
00:27:25.700
And if you live in the United States, it's like the opposite. They, you know, the idea came up and
00:27:30.580
they said, no, nope. The United States does not let the United Nations set its immigration policies.
00:27:37.300
Immigration policies will be set by Congress. And that's sort of a bipartisan thing. You know,
00:27:42.580
Hillary Clinton, just as much as Donald Trump agreed with that. And so it's not even a discussion
00:27:47.860
whether or not they would join into this compact. Well, if you live in Canada, you don't, you don't,
00:27:52.740
you don't get to have a conversation without having your name smeared by elites. And then you
00:27:58.580
don't get to have any say and the government's just going to sign it and sign away, you know,
00:28:04.100
Canadian sovereignty, sign away our ability to kick people out of the country and say no to migrants
00:28:10.260
who we don't want in our country. And we don't get to have any kind of a public say on that. So
00:28:15.940
pretty, pretty disappointing. But I think that, you know, rather than name call and smear and come
00:28:23.380
up with this thing that if you don't like the United Nations compact, it's because you're a
00:28:27.300
conspiracy theorist, you're far right, you're alt right, or you're racist. Why don't you look at the
00:28:33.060
substance of the complaints that people are making and address them in an honest way? Why can't we have
00:28:38.020
an honest discussion and a debate in this country about our immigration system? And the fact that we can't
00:28:43.860
do that, the fact that we get met with such scorn and mockery from elites, I think that's part of
00:28:51.620
the reason why Canada's approval rating on immigration has never been lower, never been lower.
00:28:57.540
Only 6% of Canadians want more immigration. And that's exactly what the Trudeau government is
00:29:02.020
delivering. And so the more you tell people that they don't have, that they can't have an opinion
00:29:07.140
about something, and then you tell them that if they do have an opinion, it's because they're racist.
00:29:11.860
And then you turn around and you do exactly what the people don't want you to do. I mean,
00:29:16.420
this is the reason why you have backlash. This is the reason why you have populist movements. This is
00:29:20.740
the reason why there is anti-immigration sentiment across the Western world. It's because leaders
00:29:26.420
don't listen to people. They don't let us have a conversation. They just talk down to us and sneer at us
00:29:32.260
and then do whatever the hell they want anyway. And I think that that's a recipe for disaster.
00:29:36.900
And if there ever becomes a big anti-migrant populist movement in Canada, Trudeau will have
00:29:43.860
no one to blame but himself. It will be Trudeau's fault because Canadians by and large accept immigration.
00:29:51.620
We understand that it's good for the economy, that it's good for, you know, basically the welfare state
00:29:58.660
to help reverse the massive, massive hole that reckless governments of the past have created
00:30:06.420
through unfunded liabilities. And we get that and we say, okay, we'll let in immigration. We know that
00:30:11.220
you know, all of our ancestors at some point migrated to Canada. And so Canadians are pretty
00:30:16.100
open towards it compared to other similar countries compared to if you look at public opinion in Australia,
00:30:21.780
or the UK, or the US. Canada always had higher approval ratings. Well, that's plummeted. It's
00:30:28.500
absolutely plummeted. Like I said, it's the lowest point since public opinion polls started happening
00:30:33.940
in the country. And I really think that that's because of this attitude that persists among elites,
00:30:40.020
among the Trudeau Liberals, among the media, this sort of consensus of elites that these people have,
00:30:46.500
that you're not allowed to have an opinion on immigration and we're going to do whatever the
00:30:49.780
hell we want, regardless of what the people think. And again, you know, if there is a backlash,
00:30:55.540
it will be 100% because of Justin Trudeau and his policies. So I'm going to leave it at that today.
00:31:01.460
Guys, thanks so much for tuning in. I encourage you to check out the Trinorth Initiative. We've
00:31:06.580
focused on immigration news. We've always got lots of content. We're putting in a new video
00:31:10.820
every single day. So check that out. And if you like the work we do, if you want to support us,
00:31:15.460
please consider joining one of the clubs. You can join for as little as $10 a month,
00:31:19.700
you help support our entire operation, independent journalism in Canada, which is incredibly rare.
00:31:26.980
And we've got a whole bunch of new things that we're going to announce in 2019,
00:31:32.100
broadening the operation, doing more reports, bringing on more journalists, doing more videos.
00:31:37.140
And I think it's a good cause because, you know, Canada needs the other side of the story. We need
00:31:42.020
the other side to be told that's not being told in the mainstream media. So check that out,
00:31:46.500
trinorthinitiative.com. All right, everyone have a great evening.