Juno News - July 23, 2020


The West Wants Out: Part 2


Episode Stats


Length

55 minutes

Words per minute

184.30632

Word count

10,312

Sentence count

559

Harmful content

Misogyny

12

sentences flagged

Hate speech

20

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Coming up, we continue our look at Western alienation and Alberta independence. In Part 2 of this two-part series, I talk with Danny Hozak, the Executive Director of the Economic Education Association of Alberta (EDA) and host of the Freedom Talk conference, about the current situation in Western Canada.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Welcome to Canada's most irreverent talk show. This is the Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:13.160 Coming up, we continue our look at Western alienation and Alberta independence, nearly two decades after the famous firewall letter. Where are things and where are they headed?
00:00:25.080 The Andrew Lawton Show starts right now.
00:00:30.000 Welcome back to the Andrew Lawton Show, continuing our series on Western alienation, part two of this two-part series we started earlier in the week.
00:00:41.320 And I'm very grateful to all the people that responded to that episode and had a lot of interesting feedback.
00:00:46.840 One of the big ones that I want to address right out of the gate is people expressing a bit of frustration that I use Western alienation and Alberta independence somewhat interchangeably.
00:00:58.520 And the argument was coming from people from Saskatchewan and even British Columbia and Manitoba that are saying,
00:01:04.440 Whoa, hang on. I mean, I'm upset with Western, with the Western treatment by Canada as well.
00:01:09.520 I'm looking at finding ways that we can get a better deal, and I'm not in Alberta.
00:01:14.500 And I'd say completely fair point. I did try to talk about Western alienation as a more broad concept.
00:01:20.840 But I also think it's fairly safe to say that the hotbed of this sentiment is in Alberta.
00:01:27.120 That's where the conference I was at, the Freedom Talk conference was.
00:01:30.760 That's where a lot of the discussions have been in the provincial government.
00:01:33.660 That's where the fair deal panel is.
00:01:35.440 But no, there is a completely valid point here that it isn't just about Alberta versus Canada.
00:01:41.400 It's Alberta, parts of BC, Saskatchewan, parts of Manitoba against the Canadian treatment of this whole region.
00:01:50.880 And I'm certain that people in Northern BC are not happy getting lumped in with Vancouver, Victoria, and the so-called Lower Mainland.
00:01:58.480 So to the people in Northern BC that see themselves as Albertans at heart, I'm with you.
00:02:02.800 To the people of Saskatchewan that have their own grievances that are very similar to those of Alberta, I'm with you as well.
00:02:08.680 This episode, when I talk about the Western alienation, the Western independence, and Alberta independence,
00:02:15.020 know that I am totally aware of these things, and certainly this is a broader concept.
00:02:20.720 And it's why, to the few people that emailed me and said, well, why are you stoking Western separatism, I respond that I'm not.
00:02:28.440 What I want, and I was unequivocal about this when I spoke at Freedom Talk, I want a Canada that respects all regions of Canada,
00:02:36.700 and a Canada that does this in a way that is not inviting separatism.
00:02:41.920 And that's the problem.
00:02:42.860 I think it's a failure of confederation when provinces are not able to enjoy their own success
00:02:48.560 without having to write checks to the rest of Canada, despite the ingratitude of the rest of Canada.
00:02:54.260 And that's what the equalization formula, as one notable example, has certainly done.
00:03:00.000 So we focused on the political side of this in the first part of the series,
00:03:04.600 and I want to look at some of the cultural aspects of this.
00:03:07.640 What is the discussion really trying to accomplish?
00:03:10.420 What's the backdrop for it?
00:03:11.920 And as such, what is it going to look like moving forward?
00:03:15.660 I want to first share with you my interview with Danny Hozak,
00:03:18.580 the chairman of the Economic Education Association of Alberta,
00:03:22.340 which is the group that hosts Freedom Talk,
00:03:24.460 this conference that I was at doing interviews on the weekend about Western alienation and Western independence,
00:03:31.060 and specifically Alberta independence.
00:03:33.500 And I spoke with Danny about what it is that they're really looking for,
00:03:37.620 what it is that the goal is for him personally, for the people at the conference,
00:03:42.180 and how this fits into the discussion that is going on right now across Alberta.
00:03:47.020 And this is our chat.
00:03:48.540 It's good to talk to you, Danny.
00:03:49.700 Thanks for doing this, for inviting me, and thanks for sitting down today.
00:03:52.700 Thank you.
00:03:53.100 We've enjoyed your presentation.
00:03:55.340 We think it's a great function.
00:03:56.400 It's going well.
00:03:57.000 Thanks for being here.
00:03:57.720 Good.
00:03:57.980 So let's talk about where we are now.
00:03:59.800 I was at your event six months ago and spoke, and spoke to you there.
00:04:03.500 And what would you say has changed in the Alberta independence discussion since November?
00:04:08.600 Well, certainly our hope that the Fair Deal panel would come back with a roadmap to recovery has changed
00:04:20.380 because now they've come back with their recommendation.
00:04:23.800 The panel has reported.
00:04:25.260 The government has made recommendations based on the report.
00:04:28.720 And as I said yesterday, their recommendations were, in our humble opinion, more talk than action.
00:04:33.740 And we were disappointed by that.
00:04:35.160 And that's one of the reasons that we're forging ahead right now is we're saying somebody has to make something happen.
00:04:41.020 We need to get a new deal for Alberta, and we're intent on doing that.
00:04:44.960 And I think the number of people who realize that we need a new deal is growing by the day.
00:04:50.540 When I told a couple of people that I was going to be coming out and speaking and reporting here,
00:04:55.720 I had one person who had said, oh, is that that separatist conference in Alberta?
00:04:59.500 And what's, I think, interesting is that that really isn't the case at all.
00:05:02.720 I mean, certainly there are some people here that I think are very pessimistic on the forecast of what Alberta can do.
00:05:08.740 But you've been fairly clear on this, that you want a good deal for Alberta,
00:05:12.840 whether that's in Confederation or outside of Confederation, stands to be seen.
00:05:17.640 But your hope is still that Alberta can function within the Canadian experience.
00:05:21.740 Is that the case?
00:05:22.380 Absolutely.
00:05:23.540 You know what I mean?
00:05:25.780 You're right.
00:05:26.500 We just want to get a new deal.
00:05:28.740 We want it to fairly reflect everyone's contributions to the country.
00:05:34.160 But we're certainly quite happy to get it within the country.
00:05:37.320 And as, you know, even our speaker's remains pointed out this morning, I mean, all we have
00:05:42.160 to do is take charge of a lot of our, you know, have our own police force, you know, collect
00:05:47.280 our own taxes, have our own pension plan, have our own unemployment program.
00:05:51.600 And I think it will take a lot of the heat and a lot of the anger and resentment out of
00:05:56.220 some of the discussions we're having.
00:05:57.640 And once we've got them, most of us, I think, would be happy to just get back to work living
00:06:02.720 the good life.
00:06:03.900 One of the themes that you've mentioned, and I know other people have mentioned at
00:06:07.880 the conference this weekend, is that we're coming up in January on the 20th anniversary
00:06:12.340 of the firewall letter.
00:06:13.520 And I think that, well, looking back on that, what it shows us is that a lot of these concerns
00:06:18.140 and a lot of the suggestions to fix them are not new.
00:06:21.640 So I guess for you, you've been in Alberta politics for years.
00:06:25.180 Why do you think now is different?
00:06:26.980 I mean, why do you think that the discussion will or should grab hold now in a way that it
00:06:31.320 didn't in 2001?
00:06:32.780 Well, I think it's that old saying, fool me once, shame on you.
00:06:36.760 Fool me twice, shame on me.
00:06:38.120 You know what I mean?
00:06:38.500 And I think there's a growing number of people are realizing, you know, what the heck, this
00:06:42.380 is happening again.
00:06:45.100 This is the second time in many of our lifetimes that an Eastern-led government has destroyed 1.00
00:06:49.800 a generation of Alberta's accumulated wealth, the hopes and dreams of families and communities
00:06:55.380 and businesses.
00:06:56.080 This is, and enough is enough, to put it quite frankly.
00:06:59.560 And so we want to make something happen.
00:07:01.600 I mean, people are committed to making it happen.
00:07:04.920 And I think increasingly we're realizing, one of the sayings I like is that you're not,
00:07:10.280 no matter how many times you fail, you're not a failure until you blame someone else.
00:07:14.080 And I think for too long we've sort of looked at this problem and thought, oh yeah, you know,
00:07:18.940 Ontario isn't treating us right.
00:07:20.240 Quebec isn't treating us right.
00:07:21.440 Someone isn't treating us right.
00:07:22.820 But I think all of a sudden the realization is sinking in.
00:07:26.800 Getting a better deal is within our grasp.
00:07:29.560 We just have to do it.
00:07:30.560 It's not our fault that Quebec got a better deal than we did.
00:07:33.580 They obviously read the art of the deal sooner than we did.
00:07:36.100 And so they've got a good deal.
00:07:38.700 But we've been, to me, if there's blame to be laid, it has to be laid at the feet of the
00:07:45.400 people who have represented Alberta over the last 30 years.
00:07:48.560 They've let our wealth slip away.
00:07:52.480 And now when we really do need to have some resources, we're in the most difficult financial
00:07:59.360 situation.
00:08:00.140 We've been in the province since the 30s and we're ill prepared for the storm that's upon us.
00:08:05.000 I know one of the things, and you talked about this with the Fair Deal report, is that a
00:08:09.740 lot of people don't feel that even the Alberta government, the provincial government, is doing
00:08:13.080 enough to lobby for Alberta's interests in Ottawa.
00:08:16.100 And even if you take a very cynical view of politics, which is to say that, you know, they
00:08:21.040 just do things to get re-elected.
00:08:22.600 If there is enough of a growing sentiment of wanting independence, of feeling alienated,
00:08:27.500 why is there not a political incentive for the Alberta government to be a lot more of a
00:08:34.000 fire-breather in discussions with Ottawa?
00:08:37.240 I literally don't understand it.
00:08:39.760 And one of the only concrete action steps from the government's recommendations was to
00:08:46.440 create a presence in Ottawa.
00:08:48.540 And I thought, like, pardon me, like we actually, Alberta taxpayers did create a presence in Ottawa.
00:08:53.740 They're called MPs.
00:08:55.320 But it makes it very difficult for them to do their job when the leadership of our province
00:09:01.260 says, oh, everything's fine.
00:09:02.320 We're hoping to get a little bit better deal, but everything's fine.
00:09:04.760 You can always count on us.
00:09:06.500 And so I think it's unfair to our, like the leadership of Alberta doing that is unfair to
00:09:13.180 our MPs.
00:09:13.760 If our leaders would say, like, we want a new deal, well, then our MPs could go down
00:09:19.020 there and bang on the table and say, look, my people aren't happy.
00:09:22.400 We have to do something about this, and then it would happen.
00:09:25.080 But when the premier of the province you're representing says, oh, everything's fine,
00:09:29.160 we don't want to cause any trouble, if they went and pounded on the table, they'd be getting
00:09:33.080 shunned by their colleagues just the same way as Drew Barnes is getting shunned by his
00:09:36.520 colleagues for speaking up for the people that he's representing.
00:09:39.260 And it's not even just a left versus right problem here.
00:09:43.340 Jason Kenney, of course, a conservative, a longtime conservative stalwart.
00:09:47.160 You look at the Federal Conservative Party of Canada leadership race now, and not one of
00:09:52.080 the leadership candidates hails from west of Toronto.
00:09:54.920 And that doesn't mean that the leadership candidates are not interested in the west and interested
00:09:59.000 in Alberta and all of these issues.
00:10:00.800 But there isn't a representation there.
00:10:03.100 And I guess there are two parts to what I want to get at here.
00:10:06.120 Number one, do you think that this is just because Albertans are not getting engaged at
00:10:11.440 the federal level because they are so frustrated?
00:10:13.920 And the other part is, what can you do, in your view, beyond these summits, which I think
00:10:18.620 are a great starting point, to get more western voices in these national discussions?
00:10:23.720 Well, again, Alberta has to, they have to take charge of making or creating their own destiny. 1.00
00:10:34.140 And then everything will start to fall in place.
00:10:36.260 And to the credit of the four national conservative leadership, as you know, Derek Sloan was here
00:10:41.400 yesterday.
00:10:42.240 And I think, I think he improved our province and our conference by being here.
00:10:47.560 And I think he went away, so he said, he went away with having a greater appreciation of
00:10:52.740 some of the issues that we're dealing with.
00:10:54.320 So we certainly appreciate them being here.
00:10:56.080 But again, this is Alberta's responsibility.
00:10:59.040 And I mean, and again, let's, and again, you know, I've sort of laid the blame on our
00:11:03.260 leadership.
00:11:03.760 But having said that, I mean, there's a lot of us that have lived pretty comfortable
00:11:07.560 lives, and we've let our leadership do that to us.
00:11:09.860 And so we all, I mean, there's a growing movement to stand up and say, OK, what did we do wrong?
00:11:14.160 That's why I asked people earlier to read Michael Wagner's book about separation, because some
00:11:19.160 of the people who have become newly frustrated, newly alienated, or, you know, I mean, all
00:11:24.140 they're talking about, well, we're going to change this in three or four years, just because
00:11:27.580 all of a sudden they're focused on it.
00:11:29.240 And the point we're making this, we've tried this, and we've been to this dance before,
00:11:33.000 and it's by no means certain that we'll get a new deal.
00:11:37.900 But it's certain that we're not going to stop trying till we do.
00:11:40.340 So let me ask you then, Danny, about where you want to see this go, because you said
00:11:46.100 on stage, and I think it was very apt, that talk's a lot easier than action, but, you know,
00:11:49.900 action ultimately does more than talk.
00:11:51.420 And I think the middle ground there was that sometimes you need the talk to trigger the
00:11:55.320 action.
00:11:56.100 What is the action?
00:11:57.060 Because for a lot of people, there was some optimism and hope that the Fair Deal panel
00:12:00.440 would be that.
00:12:01.380 You're saying that wasn't the case.
00:12:03.540 A referendum is something that Jason Kenney is pushing down the line a little bit, despite
00:12:07.640 people wanting it more imminently.
00:12:09.680 So what do you think the action would be in the ideal world that would get us to the
00:12:14.840 point that you'd say, I think we're having a fairer deal now, or we have a discussion
00:12:18.660 that is leading to a fair deal now?
00:12:21.100 Well, I think, and we're going to talk about this this afternoon, leading to getting the
00:12:26.720 new deal, there's three ways to, it has to be led by our provincial government. 0.98
00:12:33.220 I mean, irrespective of a change coming, I mean, the government is in charge of making
00:12:37.080 things happen.
00:12:37.700 So it has to be led by the provincial government of Alberta.
00:12:41.020 And so there's three ways to make it happen.
00:12:44.140 One, and at this point in time, the provincial government, as you say, you know, Premier
00:12:48.740 Kenney is, I would say, spending more time trying to delay action than actually, you
00:12:53.300 know, creating action.
00:12:54.140 And so we're going to try and come up with a specific action step with specific timelines.
00:12:59.980 And there's three things, there's three ways of making it happen.
00:13:04.000 And I say quite often that it's easier to change the government's mind than it is to
00:13:08.680 change the government.
00:13:09.980 So we have sort of two plans for changing the government's mind and one for changing the
00:13:14.780 government.
00:13:15.160 And so there's two ways to change the government's mind.
00:13:17.880 And one is you can go to your MLA and say, look, I know you're not talking about doing
00:13:21.680 this, but we want you to change your mind and we want you to set a specific time frame
00:13:25.600 for having our own police, for having or collecting our own tax, for having our own pension.
00:13:30.600 And with at the same time as you're laying out this agenda, set a specific date for voting
00:13:35.600 on, you know, autonomy or separation or whatever, if we're not able to achieve some of these
00:13:39.720 things.
00:13:39.900 Although most of them, we don't need the approval of these to do them anyway, so we can just
00:13:43.540 darn well do it. 0.92
00:13:44.260 So step one is talk to your MLA and say, do you want to change your mind?
00:13:47.940 Do you want to help us, you know, get a new deal for Alberta?
00:13:51.500 If you can't change the MLA's mind, well, then you have to change the MLA.
00:13:55.860 So a lot of people want to be involved in the UCP and they don't have any intention of
00:14:00.380 working in a different party, but they're absolutely committed, as are we, to getting
00:14:04.260 a new deal.
00:14:05.140 So they're going to go and try and change the MLA's mind.
00:14:07.280 If they can't do that, they're going to set their sights on changing the MLA.
00:14:10.580 So there's going to be a group of people working on that.
00:14:13.240 And clearly, as you heard yesterday, there's a group of people who think, you're not going
00:14:17.100 to be able to do that.
00:14:18.000 We're going to have to change the government.
00:14:19.660 And as you know, Paul Himman announced yesterday that he was going to be the interim leader
00:14:24.000 of the new Wild Rose Independence Party.
00:14:26.040 And he's going to start traveling the province talking about why, you know, trying to change
00:14:30.880 the government's mind isn't worth the trouble and that we need to make a plan to change the
00:14:35.580 government in 2023.
00:14:37.120 So those are the three, and we're going to, you know, after dinner, we're going to, after
00:14:41.280 lunch, we're going to take some suggestions from people, like where do you want to help
00:14:44.800 in this continuum?
00:14:46.160 One of the things that we've said to our group, we're all sort of fighting the same war against,
00:14:50.680 you know, the assault on freedom and debt and deficit and everything else.
00:14:55.060 But we're not all at every battle all the time.
00:14:57.960 We're going to be at lots of different battles in different areas and different people want
00:15:01.720 to address it in different ways.
00:15:02.720 But we're going to, you know, we're going to try and coordinate all the work we're doing
00:15:06.740 and move forward.
00:15:07.940 But we're certainly going to say, look, I think it's September 1st is the 115th anniversary
00:15:13.660 of the beginning of Alberta.
00:15:15.760 So we're going to, by then, we're hoping to lay out a pretty concrete plan of what the
00:15:19.280 other timelines we want.
00:15:20.760 And so anyway, that's our plan.
00:15:22.280 And it's hidden in plain sight.
00:15:24.740 All right.
00:15:24.960 Well, I'm glad it is.
00:15:25.880 Danny Hozak is the chairman of the Economic Education Association.
00:15:29.500 Thanks again for having me and for sitting down today.
00:15:31.380 Thank you.
00:15:31.920 I think Danny Hozak's position on this is an important one.
00:15:35.840 He wants the best deal for Alberta.
00:15:38.420 If that's in Confederation, great. 0.97
00:15:40.380 If it has to be out of Confederation, that is a last resort.
00:15:44.380 But the point of this that I think a lot of people are missing out on is that you can't
00:15:49.100 just discount the experiences and frustrations of people in the West by saying, oh, you know,
00:15:54.380 they're just separatists or, oh, they're never going to be happy.
00:15:56.780 No, the vast majority want to be happy.
00:15:59.280 The vast majority want a deal that's going to make it so that a lot of these concerns
00:16:03.940 that are reaching, nearing, or potentially are at a boiling point will subside.
00:16:09.700 But when you have Jason Kenney dismissing these concerns, when you have a federal government
00:16:14.400 that despite really just giving lip service to Western fears in October has done absolutely
00:16:20.660 nothing to ensure the West feel like they are at the table, this is only going to get worse.
00:16:28.520 And a lot of the specifics of what it is that people in the West want, it's not just about
00:16:33.500 the cultural shock here of a liberal country versus a conservative province.
00:16:39.680 It isn't about that.
00:16:40.980 People try to simplify it to that, but that isn't it at all.
00:16:44.120 In fact, if you look at the combined populations of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Northern BC, Manitoba,
00:16:50.780 these are areas that are very conservative in nature.
00:16:54.540 They make up a huge chunk of Canada, but still they don't feel like their interests are represented
00:16:59.360 in the federal government and by extension in Confederation's primary system of government,
00:17:05.580 which is Parliament in Ottawa.
00:17:07.420 And what's interesting here is that a lot of the things that are being sought are not
00:17:12.380 radical concepts at all.
00:17:14.300 In fact, one of the most notable qualities is that many of these things were proposed
00:17:19.200 nearly two decades ago.
00:17:21.540 And by some of these proposals, what I'm talking about are areas where the West wants to,
00:17:26.060 for lack of a better term, repatriate things that are currently handled by the federal government
00:17:30.980 that could be under provincial control, notably policing, notably an Alberta pension plan
00:17:37.260 rather than the Canada pension plan.
00:17:39.400 Quebec has done these things.
00:17:41.000 Why can't Alberta? 1.00
00:17:42.040 That's the refrain.
00:17:43.500 And many of these ideas were laid out in 2001 in a famous op-ed called The Firewall Letter
00:17:50.520 that was authored by a number of luminaries, including Stephen Harper and Professor Tom Flanagan,
00:17:55.600 who went on to be the campaign manager that steered Stephen Harper's Conservatives to victory in 2006.
00:18:02.720 But in 2001, the question was, how can we in Alberta put, for lack of a better term,
00:18:09.740 a firewall around us?
00:18:12.180 And there was a lot of controversy here.
00:18:14.560 A lot of people that thought this was separation.
00:18:16.900 But what's interesting is that it wasn't.
00:18:19.180 It wasn't actually about separation.
00:18:21.080 It was about trying to avoid the flare-up in tensions that we are seeing now.
00:18:26.760 Because if this had gone forward, Alberta wouldn't have been as reliant on the federal government now.
00:18:32.600 I sat down with Tom Flanagan at the conference, and we spoke about the letter,
00:18:36.620 coming up on its 20th anniversary, and looking at how the situation is now,
00:18:41.600 and ultimately how the ideas put forward in the letter fared.
00:18:44.920 Tom, it's good to talk to you again.
00:18:46.260 Thanks for sitting down with me today.
00:18:47.520 My pleasure.
00:18:48.560 You know, this is a really pivotal point in Alberta.
00:18:51.460 A lot of people are talking about independence, alienation,
00:18:55.200 discussed as something being at an all-time high.
00:18:58.280 It's been nearly 20 years since the famous Alberta Firewall Letter
00:19:02.920 was first published in the National Post, coming up January 2001.
00:19:06.620 was the initial publication of it.
00:19:09.100 And what's interesting when I hear a lot of the independence talk now
00:19:12.680 is that almost all of the remedies that are being proposed
00:19:15.940 are things that were enumerated quite clearly in that letter.
00:19:19.920 So I guess as you look back at that, I mean,
00:19:22.120 why do you think this has really hit a resurgence now, almost two decades later?
00:19:26.640 Yeah.
00:19:27.140 Well, it is a kind of a funny history.
00:19:29.620 The so-called Firewall Letter was actually Stephen Harper's idea
00:19:33.600 and came to him after the 2000 election.
00:19:38.120 And the Canadian alliance appeared to be stalled.
00:19:42.240 And Stephen was president of the National Citizens Coalition.
00:19:44.920 And he was thinking of a way to revivify provinces in Canada
00:19:51.100 because it looked like change through the federal government would not be possible.
00:19:55.520 So some friends, we sat down and we kind of brainstormed on
00:20:00.100 what would be some ways in which provinces could make greater use
00:20:03.920 of their constitutional powers.
00:20:05.500 It wasn't meant to be a separatist document,
00:20:08.300 but it was meant to encourage provinces to move in a more autonomous direction.
00:20:15.260 And we wrote the first one for Alberta,
00:20:18.440 but actually Stephen intended there to be other letters for other provinces as well.
00:20:23.360 Well, everything changed very quickly
00:20:26.520 when the Canadian alliance declared a leadership race to be open.
00:20:33.480 Stockwell Day had gotten into political trouble.
00:20:36.080 Stephen decided to run for leader of the alliance.
00:20:38.400 And so he never did anything further with the Firewall Letter at all.
00:20:42.860 He moved into, he saw an opportunity to change federal politics,
00:20:48.520 which in fact he did, you know, became prime minister for 10 years.
00:20:55.440 And so in the period when Stephen was prime minister,
00:20:57.600 there wasn't this kind of talk of separation in Alberta.
00:21:04.420 Stephen didn't deliver everything that Albertans might have wanted,
00:21:07.480 but at least he didn't appear to be hostile to Alberta.
00:21:10.620 You know, he appeared to be friendly.
00:21:11.480 And he spoke in favor of the oil industry and of pipelines.
00:21:15.500 And he, so I think Albertans were satisfied.
00:21:21.400 But in the meantime, the ideas of the Firewall Letter were percolating.
00:21:26.580 Even though Stephen chose not to do anything with them
00:21:29.300 after he got into federal politics,
00:21:31.440 they caught on in grassroots elements within provincial politics,
00:21:37.080 the Wild Rose Party particularly.
00:21:38.960 And they were kept alive by provincial parties
00:21:43.260 and finally became part of Jason Kenney's platform.
00:21:48.680 And he ended up appointing the Fair Deal Panel,
00:21:51.220 which is to examine a lot of what was in the Firewall Letter,
00:21:55.160 plus a lot of other good ideas too.
00:21:56.740 So the thing has snowballed as time goes on.
00:21:59.900 It's sort of way, we wrote it, I say we, I just held the pen,
00:22:04.880 people contributed ideas.
00:22:07.160 I just edited it.
00:22:08.400 I always call myself the editor general.
00:22:09.980 But it got way beyond our conception.
00:22:17.280 It's now being used for totally different purposes, which is fine.
00:22:22.980 You know, there's no property rights, political ideas.
00:22:26.340 So, but it's had an interesting life, life of its own.
00:22:30.200 So where it is now, I think it's been a source of ideas
00:22:34.220 for Alberta to fight for a better deal,
00:22:40.200 maybe leading to a separation someday,
00:22:44.940 but that's not really necessarily part of it at all.
00:22:47.920 It's a way of fighting back, taking the initiative.
00:22:52.680 Now, interestingly, I think the best idea of all
00:22:55.080 that has come up since then
00:22:56.540 is to take on the equalization issue.
00:22:59.540 That was not in the Firewall Letter.
00:23:01.400 We didn't think of that one.
00:23:05.000 Just, as I say, it was six guys brainstorming.
00:23:08.480 And we put down some ideas that looked good to us,
00:23:10.980 but it wasn't a product of extensive research.
00:23:13.580 So we didn't even think of equalization.
00:23:16.480 But since then, there have been Supreme Court decisions
00:23:18.660 which have made it possible to take that on.
00:23:24.580 So I think Jason has done the logical thing
00:23:28.000 is to single out equalization as the lowest hanging fruit.
00:23:31.940 If you hold a referendum on equalization,
00:23:34.100 you're going to get like 90% plus in Alberta voting,
00:23:37.500 whatever precisely the question is.
00:23:40.380 It'll be on the, against equalization.
00:23:43.540 So you start there with a big success,
00:23:45.600 and then you try and, then you demand
00:23:47.820 that the other provinces come to the table
00:23:50.300 for, and the federal government
00:23:51.420 for constitutional negotiations.
00:23:53.240 Now we have a Supreme Court authority for that.
00:23:56.700 And then you go from there.
00:23:58.100 So I think it's, I think it may have some legs.
00:24:01.360 Do you think that the fact that the Firewall Letter
00:24:03.840 didn't really have imminently any real effect
00:24:07.580 is evidence of the fact that these concerns
00:24:10.980 will almost be cyclical,
00:24:12.540 where it will come and then people will move on from it?
00:24:14.940 Or do you think that the dialogue
00:24:16.220 is different this time around?
00:24:17.440 Well, no, no, I think that it is cyclical
00:24:20.980 with respect to federal politics.
00:24:22.720 The movement for the Reform Party arose basically
00:24:27.060 as a reaction to the, first as a reaction
00:24:30.080 to the national energy program,
00:24:31.580 but then disappointment in the Mulroney government,
00:24:34.440 belief that the Mulroney government
00:24:36.240 wasn't that much different from the Pierre Trudeau's government.
00:24:40.160 Maybe that was unfair to Mulroney,
00:24:41.660 but that way that's how people perceived it.
00:24:43.360 But then that resulted in a long strain of events,
00:24:48.640 Reform Party, Canadian Alliance,
00:24:50.120 merger with the remnants of the Progressive Conservatives,
00:24:53.380 the Harper government for 10 years.
00:24:55.240 People in the West were largely satisfied.
00:24:57.660 Then you get a change in power
00:24:59.380 and policies that are, since 2015,
00:25:03.360 that have been hostile to the interests of Albertans.
00:25:06.480 And then a re-election of that government,
00:25:08.400 which was the final nail in the coffin.
00:25:10.500 Yeah, the re-election of the government.
00:25:13.900 And so, you know, if federal politics moves
00:25:19.980 in a different direction,
00:25:20.960 then I think the antagonism in Alberta will again decline.
00:25:26.560 It really plays off what the federal government is doing.
00:25:29.780 But when the federal government is attacking our livelihood,
00:25:33.380 naturally the temperature is going to rise.
00:25:36.620 So, you know, my weakness in politics,
00:25:40.320 I could never predict the future.
00:25:42.620 You know, if I could,
00:25:43.700 I wouldn't be just a lousy retired professor.
00:25:45.980 Now I'd be something much more important.
00:25:50.100 So I can't predict the future.
00:25:51.480 But I think the pattern is clear,
00:25:52.960 that if the federal government is attacking Alberta,
00:25:55.840 Albertans are going to want to fight back.
00:25:57.560 And the idea is that we're in the firewall letter
00:25:59.440 originally for a different purpose,
00:26:00.620 but they can now be used.
00:26:03.020 In the meantime, they've grown
00:26:04.060 and been elaborated by others.
00:26:06.360 And I think they're going to provide some ammunition
00:26:09.000 for fighting back.
00:26:13.120 Up until now, Alberta's largely been just,
00:26:15.920 you know, complaining about federal initiatives,
00:26:19.020 but hasn't had initiatives of its own.
00:26:21.760 And so I think that's what the letter now
00:26:24.680 will provide,
00:26:26.380 is some bullets to fire,
00:26:28.200 starting with equalization,
00:26:29.060 equalization,
00:26:29.780 then creating an Alberta police force,
00:26:32.820 possibly an Alberta pension plan.
00:26:34.420 These are initiatives that,
00:26:36.860 A, could be good for Alberta,
00:26:38.160 and B, are disruptive
00:26:40.140 to federal,
00:26:43.660 existing federal programs and policies.
00:26:45.580 So this can be a way,
00:26:46.780 I would hope,
00:26:48.020 of bringing whoever is in charge
00:26:49.940 of the federal government,
00:26:50.820 bringing them to the table
00:26:51.860 and saying,
00:26:52.300 look, the situation is intolerable,
00:26:53.800 and you're going to have to make
00:26:56.100 some concessions.
00:26:59.160 So I, you know,
00:27:00.200 but I was really impressed
00:27:02.420 with Germain Belzile's presentation.
00:27:05.100 You know, this is a long game.
00:27:07.360 The separatist movement in Quebec
00:27:09.580 originates, let's say,
00:27:12.240 in the early 1960s.
00:27:13.480 Well, that's, you know,
00:27:14.200 almost 60 years ago.
00:27:15.940 And it took decades for them
00:27:17.920 to achieve various objectives.
00:27:22.260 You know, it's all gradual
00:27:23.660 over a long period of time,
00:27:24.920 and there were setbacks
00:27:25.780 along the way.
00:27:27.260 But we're really just now
00:27:30.340 setting out in Alberta
00:27:31.680 with our own version of,
00:27:33.840 let's call it an autonomous strategy.
00:27:37.600 It doesn't yield dividends overnight.
00:27:40.900 It's going to take time.
00:27:42.120 And I guess if,
00:27:43.140 to go with some of those
00:27:43.960 firewall recommendations
00:27:45.060 of repatriating a police force,
00:27:46.920 a pension plan,
00:27:47.940 and, you know,
00:27:48.720 perhaps even taking
00:27:49.740 federal income tax in Alberta
00:27:51.680 and then passing it on
00:27:52.700 to the government
00:27:53.300 and Alberta Revenue Agency,
00:27:54.820 it's another idea
00:27:55.540 that's been put forward.
00:27:56.940 All of these suggestions,
00:27:58.180 do you not think
00:27:58.760 these are leading themselves
00:27:59.740 to a point where
00:28:00.740 Alberta will be so segregated
00:28:04.460 from the Canadian experience,
00:28:05.980 if you will,
00:28:06.520 that it might just be worth
00:28:08.180 cutting that final thread,
00:28:09.900 which is the connection to Canada,
00:28:11.540 being a province of Canada?
00:28:12.780 Yeah.
00:28:13.560 Well, it could end in two ways.
00:28:15.020 Yes, it could.
00:28:15.920 Yes, it could keep building
00:28:17.100 and building and building
00:28:17.920 and still there's not much
00:28:19.600 of a connection left
00:28:20.540 and separation becomes
00:28:23.600 a foregone conclusion.
00:28:25.020 But as I was listening
00:28:26.080 to Bell Zill this morning,
00:28:27.960 it occurred to me
00:28:29.040 that there could also be,
00:28:30.300 you might call it
00:28:31.280 an autonomy trap,
00:28:32.620 that if you're successful
00:28:33.700 in your demands
00:28:34.720 for greater control
00:28:35.940 over your own affairs
00:28:36.800 and you end up
00:28:37.360 with your own police force
00:28:38.160 and your own pension plan
00:28:39.200 and equalization
00:28:41.900 becomes less harmful
00:28:42.900 and you have a bunch
00:28:44.800 of other things,
00:28:46.280 then you say,
00:28:47.240 well, okay,
00:28:47.700 we can live with that.
00:28:48.960 And that's kind of
00:28:49.640 what's happened in Quebec
00:28:50.600 as the demand
00:28:52.140 for separation,
00:28:53.660 which was driving it
00:28:55.580 and made federal politicians
00:28:57.400 willing to make concessions,
00:28:58.980 but the demand
00:28:59.920 for separation
00:29:00.660 hasn't disappeared,
00:29:02.320 but it has certainly declined.
00:29:03.940 So it could be
00:29:04.700 that by making
00:29:05.400 these concessions,
00:29:06.220 the situation
00:29:09.860 gets resolved
00:29:10.760 and the Albertans
00:29:14.000 are happy,
00:29:15.520 you know,
00:29:15.760 content with
00:29:16.460 greater autonomy.
00:29:18.680 But, I mean,
00:29:19.300 a lot of this
00:29:19.760 is going to depend
00:29:20.420 on factors from outside.
00:29:24.140 If the,
00:29:25.100 no matter what you did
00:29:26.080 about a pension plan
00:29:27.000 and a police force,
00:29:28.040 if the federal government
00:29:29.380 is still trying
00:29:29.980 to strangle
00:29:30.480 your main industry,
00:29:31.920 there are going to be
00:29:33.340 demands for separation.
00:29:34.860 So something,
00:29:36.220 things have to happen
00:29:36.920 outside of the drive
00:29:39.340 for greater autonomy.
00:29:40.900 I've heard from
00:29:41.760 a lot of people
00:29:42.440 at the conference
00:29:43.380 this weekend
00:29:43.940 that Jason Kenney
00:29:45.280 is not the answer.
00:29:46.220 This guy who,
00:29:46.840 a couple of years ago,
00:29:47.520 it seems like,
00:29:48.100 was being trumpeted
00:29:48.780 as the savior of Alberta
00:29:50.320 coming in,
00:29:51.060 uniting the right,
00:29:52.180 is now just not
00:29:53.660 really held in high esteem
00:29:55.060 by a lot of the most
00:29:56.000 adamant separatists.
00:29:57.220 And I know you and I
00:29:58.080 were talking earlier
00:29:58.880 about this,
00:29:59.420 and you're saying
00:29:59.900 that you think
00:30:00.680 it's far too early
00:30:01.660 to reach a conclusion
00:30:02.660 that he's not
00:30:03.380 dealing with this issue.
00:30:04.800 Yeah, I think we,
00:30:06.460 personally,
00:30:06.880 I believe we need
00:30:07.480 to give Jason a chance.
00:30:08.780 He came back to Alberta,
00:30:09.900 he pulled off
00:30:10.660 an amazing political
00:30:12.780 accomplishment
00:30:13.360 of first becoming
00:30:14.420 leader of the
00:30:15.260 progressive conservatives
00:30:16.140 and then leading
00:30:17.180 a merger drive
00:30:18.720 with Wild Rose
00:30:19.520 and then become
00:30:20.040 leader of Wild Rose
00:30:20.920 and then defeating
00:30:21.700 the NDP
00:30:24.360 in an election
00:30:25.080 overwhelmingly.
00:30:25.780 so, you know,
00:30:27.540 he's already
00:30:27.940 accomplished
00:30:28.580 a political trifecta.
00:30:31.040 The guy's obviously
00:30:32.220 got political talent.
00:30:33.440 I mean, I know that
00:30:34.400 anyway, having known
00:30:35.320 Jason for a long time.
00:30:36.220 He's got tremendous
00:30:37.160 political ability
00:30:37.960 and I'm certainly
00:30:39.220 not ready to
00:30:40.620 write him off.
00:30:43.140 He's been
00:30:43.780 sideswiped by
00:30:44.880 the, you know,
00:30:48.640 the combination
00:30:49.340 of the price,
00:30:51.840 international price war
00:30:52.700 over oil and COVID.
00:30:53.900 These are things
00:30:54.520 that were largely
00:30:55.680 out of his control.
00:30:57.320 So, I think this
00:30:59.240 has affected
00:31:00.020 the timetable
00:31:00.700 but I can still
00:31:01.380 see the plan
00:31:02.100 emerging
00:31:02.600 and I think
00:31:04.120 that, but, you know,
00:31:06.800 I say this
00:31:07.340 because I'm
00:31:08.140 comfortably retired
00:31:09.720 living on my pension.
00:31:11.520 You know,
00:31:11.720 if I was owning
00:31:13.340 a small oil company
00:31:15.020 I might be
00:31:15.720 a lot more impatient.
00:31:17.540 Yes, and I mean,
00:31:18.460 that was...
00:31:18.960 And I understand that.
00:31:20.040 And that was, I mean,
00:31:20.760 very much the Stephen
00:31:21.460 Harper approach
00:31:22.100 on issues.
00:31:22.640 That incrementalism,
00:31:23.680 very pragmatic
00:31:24.420 and certainly rooted
00:31:26.060 in a conservative
00:31:27.220 philosophy and I think
00:31:28.160 there are a lot of
00:31:28.700 people that don't
00:31:29.560 want incrementalism
00:31:31.000 when things are so
00:31:31.820 bad in their view
00:31:32.540 right now.
00:31:33.440 Yeah, I know.
00:31:34.820 And I understand
00:31:36.200 the impatience.
00:31:36.940 I used to be
00:31:37.400 impatient myself, but...
00:31:39.560 Before you were
00:31:40.040 retired.
00:31:40.600 Now you've got time.
00:31:42.220 But, no,
00:31:43.520 I can remember
00:31:43.960 Stephen saying that
00:31:45.040 a conservative party
00:31:47.140 has to be
00:31:47.960 incremental.
00:31:48.520 the only successful
00:31:51.300 strategy for a conservative
00:31:53.140 party is incrementalism.
00:31:54.560 I said that a long,
00:31:55.540 long time ago
00:31:56.200 when he was still
00:31:57.080 a very young man.
00:31:57.900 And do you think
00:31:58.300 that's still true?
00:31:59.260 And I think that's
00:31:59.900 still true, yeah.
00:32:00.400 And I see this as
00:32:01.180 an application of
00:32:02.580 incrementalism to
00:32:03.560 Alberta.
00:32:05.260 It's an...
00:32:05.580 To call it an application
00:32:06.680 of Harperism to Alberta,
00:32:08.080 you know,
00:32:08.520 it's no surprise
00:32:09.420 that Jason was
00:32:10.760 being helped
00:32:11.600 a great deal
00:32:12.360 on the background
00:32:12.900 by Harper.
00:32:15.800 So,
00:32:16.560 I think it worked
00:32:19.980 as long as it was
00:32:20.920 being applied
00:32:21.620 in Ottawa.
00:32:23.780 Eventually it was
00:32:24.480 defeated.
00:32:25.380 But for 10 years,
00:32:26.360 I think incrementalism
00:32:27.580 showed that it can work.
00:32:29.160 And I think it can
00:32:29.860 work here too.
00:32:30.700 But it does,
00:32:31.300 by definition,
00:32:32.000 it takes time.
00:32:33.580 Tom Flanagan,
00:32:34.400 thank you very much.
00:32:35.200 Okay.
00:32:36.200 Glad to talk.
00:32:37.820 I think the fact
00:32:38.980 that after nearly
00:32:40.220 two decades,
00:32:41.460 a lot of these
00:32:42.140 problems have
00:32:42.880 come back again.
00:32:43.980 And some people
00:32:44.720 would argue
00:32:45.140 they never went away.
00:32:46.180 But the fact
00:32:46.760 that they're coming
00:32:47.240 back again
00:32:47.800 with such fervor
00:32:48.720 is an indication
00:32:49.980 that the cultural
00:32:51.140 battle is really
00:32:52.200 what matters here.
00:32:53.620 And right now,
00:32:54.420 the culture in Alberta
00:32:55.460 has shifted a bit,
00:32:56.520 or at the very least,
00:32:57.400 they think that
00:32:57.860 the culture in Canada
00:32:58.800 has shifted a bit
00:33:00.120 in the other direction.
00:33:01.680 And I think this is
00:33:02.620 why any large movement
00:33:04.440 needs to have
00:33:05.520 some momentum,
00:33:06.240 which means it needs
00:33:07.180 to have a cultural
00:33:08.260 backdrop that is
00:33:09.840 receptive to that
00:33:10.980 movement.
00:33:11.920 Politicians are
00:33:12.660 always going to be,
00:33:13.520 and I've said this
00:33:14.040 before, followers.
00:33:15.120 And it's not to
00:33:15.720 knock them, 0.91
00:33:16.320 but it's that
00:33:16.660 they are products
00:33:17.860 of the culture
00:33:18.680 in which they live,
00:33:19.800 which means that
00:33:20.340 a politician
00:33:21.000 is not going to
00:33:22.660 do something
00:33:23.500 too, too radical
00:33:24.360 if they want
00:33:24.880 to get reelected
00:33:25.800 unless they know
00:33:26.920 that there's a portion
00:33:27.840 of the population
00:33:28.700 that is there
00:33:29.820 supporting it.
00:33:30.640 They need the cover
00:33:31.440 to say,
00:33:31.920 well, I'm doing
00:33:32.740 what the people want.
00:33:34.360 And that was why
00:33:35.140 Drew Barnes,
00:33:35.840 with whom we spoke
00:33:36.560 in the first part
00:33:37.460 of this series,
00:33:38.600 was so frustrated
00:33:40.600 with the Fair Deal
00:33:41.680 panel report
00:33:42.460 because he didn't
00:33:43.160 think it was aligning
00:33:44.100 with what the people
00:33:45.480 of Alberta
00:33:45.940 were actually telling him
00:33:47.040 when he was going
00:33:47.640 around the province
00:33:48.420 having these panel
00:33:49.580 meetings and people
00:33:50.380 were coming up
00:33:50.960 to the microphone.
00:33:51.660 And he didn't see
00:33:52.660 that really translated
00:33:54.020 into the report itself.
00:33:56.900 So a lot of these
00:33:58.380 things must advance
00:34:00.300 and must continue.
00:34:01.680 Otherwise,
00:34:02.340 there's never going
00:34:03.120 to be that significant
00:34:04.280 change.
00:34:04.780 And the fact that
00:34:05.380 two decades has elapsed
00:34:06.740 since the firewall letter
00:34:08.120 and we're back
00:34:08.720 to where we were
00:34:09.620 there is evidence
00:34:11.520 of this.
00:34:12.540 So I do want to talk
00:34:13.880 about a little bit
00:34:14.940 of the specific
00:34:15.880 part of this
00:34:17.280 because when there
00:34:18.860 is a proposal
00:34:20.720 afoot like the one
00:34:22.220 that was in the
00:34:22.820 firewall letter
00:34:23.560 and like some of the
00:34:24.780 ideas that are there
00:34:25.660 now, it's easy to get
00:34:27.240 caught up in the
00:34:27.980 abstract of,
00:34:29.040 well, you know,
00:34:29.400 Western alienation,
00:34:30.440 Western independence,
00:34:31.440 Alberta separation,
00:34:32.440 all of these things
00:34:33.100 without dealing
00:34:34.160 with the meat of it.
00:34:35.300 I talked at the
00:34:36.200 beginning of the show
00:34:36.880 about equalization
00:34:37.820 payments,
00:34:38.380 probably one of the
00:34:39.660 biggest frustrations
00:34:41.280 and the biggest
00:34:41.940 grievances that the
00:34:43.100 people of Alberta
00:34:43.780 have with their
00:34:44.920 treatment.
00:34:45.460 $20 billion to $40
00:34:47.080 billion that Alberta
00:34:48.320 is sending that is
00:34:49.700 purely for the
00:34:50.780 betterment of other
00:34:51.680 provinces and
00:34:52.520 confederation.
00:34:53.900 Imagine if, for
00:34:54.980 example, New York
00:34:55.980 was forced to
00:34:56.740 subsidize Idaho or
00:34:58.160 California was forced
00:34:59.820 to subsidize Wyoming
00:35:01.060 or whatever the case
00:35:01.940 is.
00:35:02.360 I mean, they would
00:35:03.040 never stand for that
00:35:04.260 because in the
00:35:05.300 United States,
00:35:06.180 each state has as
00:35:07.460 kind of its birthright
00:35:08.680 the ability to
00:35:10.300 govern its own
00:35:10.860 affairs, the ability
00:35:11.760 to bring in its own
00:35:12.660 revenue, the ability
00:35:13.580 to do all of these
00:35:14.820 things that are
00:35:15.380 necessary for the
00:35:16.300 betterment of the
00:35:17.080 state.
00:35:17.760 But in Canada, we
00:35:18.860 take for granted
00:35:19.700 that the successful
00:35:20.660 provinces, the
00:35:21.900 haves, must subsidize 0.68
00:35:23.940 and bankroll the
00:35:25.240 less successful ones,
00:35:26.740 the have-nots.
00:35:28.000 And I don't know if
00:35:28.720 this is just from
00:35:29.460 this very caricaturistic
00:35:32.620 version of what it
00:35:33.800 means to be Canadian
00:35:34.780 about, oh, we look
00:35:35.540 out for our
00:35:35.980 neighbours and all 0.73
00:35:36.600 of that.
00:35:37.240 But in actuality,
00:35:38.260 what it means is
00:35:38.860 that provinces like
00:35:39.840 Alberta, who have
00:35:41.000 had a great deal of
00:35:41.980 oil revenue and
00:35:43.060 energy success, but
00:35:44.560 are still economically
00:35:46.120 hurting in many
00:35:47.320 ways.
00:35:47.800 The true Alberta
00:35:49.160 success has not
00:35:50.160 translated if you
00:35:51.460 look around at
00:35:52.420 suicide rates, at
00:35:54.040 commercial vacancy
00:35:55.380 rates, at drug
00:35:56.400 use, domestic
00:35:57.520 violence, all of
00:35:58.380 these metrics that
00:35:59.240 show, as True
00:36:00.520 North dealt with in
00:36:01.560 a documentary a
00:36:02.700 couple of months
00:36:03.220 ago that show a
00:36:04.120 Calgaryen crisis, yet
00:36:06.180 Alberta is still
00:36:07.140 profiting in such a
00:36:08.260 way that it can
00:36:08.860 bankroll the
00:36:09.460 have-not provinces.
00:36:11.520 And there's
00:36:12.320 something about
00:36:13.320 this that is very
00:36:14.320 unjust, because it
00:36:15.880 means that a
00:36:16.400 province can never
00:36:17.260 quite get ahead if
00:36:18.800 the first 20 to
00:36:19.660 40 billion dollars
00:36:20.720 that it brings in
00:36:21.840 belongs to the
00:36:22.800 federal government
00:36:23.520 for the purposes of
00:36:24.660 wealth redistribution.
00:36:26.740 So what a lot of
00:36:27.640 people in Alberta
00:36:28.380 want is to find
00:36:30.160 ways that they can
00:36:31.180 govern their own
00:36:31.880 affairs more
00:36:32.960 adequately.
00:36:33.540 One example of
00:36:34.560 this is to have
00:36:35.480 an Alberta police
00:36:36.580 force, not the
00:36:38.180 RCMP, operating in
00:36:39.720 Alberta as a
00:36:40.480 provincial police
00:36:41.120 force, but an
00:36:41.700 Alberta police
00:36:42.720 force like Ontario
00:36:43.740 has with the
00:36:44.440 OPP, like Quebec 0.99
00:36:45.740 has with the
00:36:46.580 Chorité de Québec.
00:36:48.060 And this is an
00:36:49.000 area where a lot
00:36:49.940 of the naysayers,
00:36:51.540 people that aren't
00:36:52.120 fond of the
00:36:52.980 independence idea,
00:36:54.360 will try to say,
00:36:54.960 oh, but I mean,
00:36:55.540 you can't do that,
00:36:56.800 you can't make that
00:36:57.420 change, Alberta has
00:36:58.260 the RCMP.
00:36:59.420 And even some
00:37:00.560 people will say,
00:37:01.480 well, if Alberta
00:37:02.220 separates, I mean,
00:37:02.960 what are they going
00:37:03.360 to do for a
00:37:03.860 military?
00:37:04.860 People start to
00:37:05.660 come up with
00:37:06.180 reasons why Alberta
00:37:07.720 can't move on its
00:37:09.180 independence goals.
00:37:10.380 And a lot of
00:37:11.200 these, as former
00:37:12.340 Member of Parliament
00:37:13.100 Rob Anders spoke
00:37:14.080 about, are pretty
00:37:15.380 easily dealt with.
00:37:17.020 Rob Anders spoke
00:37:17.920 about the law
00:37:19.100 enforcement and
00:37:19.760 military components
00:37:20.740 specifically in his
00:37:21.720 speech at Freedom
00:37:22.820 Talk.
00:37:23.200 And I thought it was
00:37:23.900 interesting for two
00:37:24.920 reasons, because
00:37:25.640 number one, it gives
00:37:26.840 some ideas that could
00:37:27.740 be implemented now.
00:37:28.800 And it also really
00:37:30.360 talks about the
00:37:31.220 scenarios if Alberta
00:37:32.500 were to move
00:37:33.100 forward on
00:37:33.640 independence, and
00:37:34.740 why one of the
00:37:35.660 chief criticisms
00:37:36.520 that people give
00:37:37.340 isn't really one
00:37:38.220 that holds water.
00:37:39.260 This is my chat
00:37:40.180 with Rob Anders.
00:37:41.520 Rob, good to
00:37:42.040 talk to you.
00:37:42.500 Thank you very
00:37:43.000 much.
00:37:43.460 So let's talk
00:37:44.600 about where we
00:37:45.360 are in the Alberta
00:37:46.120 independence discussion,
00:37:47.260 because I find that
00:37:48.020 a lot of people who
00:37:49.480 tend to be resistant
00:37:50.560 to the idea really
00:37:51.720 try to focus on a
00:37:52.940 lot of the details to
00:37:53.980 the point of, I
00:37:54.640 think, trying to
00:37:55.200 railroad the process
00:37:56.080 about, but what
00:37:56.880 about this, but
00:37:57.440 what about this, but
00:37:58.200 what about this?
00:37:59.260 And in your talk
00:38:00.060 this weekend, you
00:38:01.220 really, I think,
00:38:01.860 dismantled a lot of
00:38:02.840 that, specifically on
00:38:03.860 policing and military,
00:38:05.360 by showing that
00:38:06.440 there's not just a
00:38:07.320 way that Alberta
00:38:08.220 could deal with that
00:38:09.120 moving forward to be
00:38:10.120 a bit more autonomous
00:38:10.900 or even perhaps
00:38:12.140 completely sovereign,
00:38:13.620 but a way that has
00:38:15.140 already been done
00:38:15.680 before elsewhere.
00:38:16.560 It's not all that
00:38:17.060 radical.
00:38:18.120 Yeah, I like to
00:38:19.280 use templates.
00:38:20.440 I'm a big believer
00:38:21.240 in history, and it
00:38:22.340 may not repeat itself,
00:38:23.260 but at least it
00:38:23.680 echoes.
00:38:24.600 So when it comes to
00:38:26.220 policing, I
00:38:26.880 Alberta's already
00:38:27.560 got the Alberta
00:38:28.280 sheriffs.
00:38:29.020 They've been
00:38:29.360 operating, you
00:38:30.180 know, for decades.
00:38:31.360 We've got almost
00:38:31.940 1,000 of them.
00:38:33.260 You know, the RCMP
00:38:34.300 force in this
00:38:34.920 province is about
00:38:35.560 3,000.
00:38:36.540 So literally, you
00:38:37.480 know, one option is
00:38:38.300 you could literally
00:38:39.000 fourfold the size of
00:38:40.580 the Alberta
00:38:40.860 sheriffs.
00:38:41.460 Mission accomplished.
00:38:42.940 Alberta, historically,
00:38:44.160 from 1916 to 1932,
00:38:46.620 federal government
00:38:47.220 didn't want to take
00:38:48.200 on all the costs.
00:38:48.940 The First World War
00:38:49.500 downloaded the
00:38:50.240 policing to the
00:38:50.760 provinces.
00:38:51.820 We had at that
00:38:52.780 point, including
00:38:53.340 Newfoundland, even
00:38:54.100 pre-49, eight out of
00:38:55.840 ten provinces had
00:38:56.660 their own
00:38:56.900 provincial police
00:38:57.500 forces.
00:38:58.520 Excuse me.
00:38:59.380 So, and Alberta
00:39:00.960 did a great job.
00:39:01.920 You know, for the
00:39:02.480 first year, there was
00:39:03.440 a bit of a transition.
00:39:04.960 There were some people
00:39:05.540 who'd been part of the
00:39:06.400 Northwest Mounted
00:39:07.120 Police that, you know,
00:39:08.300 got there through the
00:39:09.020 nepotism or this, that,
00:39:10.540 or whatever.
00:39:11.080 And the first year or so,
00:39:12.200 the Alberta
00:39:12.480 Provincial Police
00:39:12.940 sorted it out, and it
00:39:14.540 became a force that had
00:39:15.580 a better rate with
00:39:17.920 regard to conviction,
00:39:19.700 et cetera, than the
00:39:21.080 Northwest Mounted Police
00:39:21.960 had been before.
00:39:23.540 Criminals wanted to 0.98
00:39:24.500 avoid Alberta because
00:39:25.460 it was known for a
00:39:26.160 place that you were
00:39:26.620 going to get convicted
00:39:27.320 and go to jail, you 0.97
00:39:28.280 know.
00:39:28.840 And so we had a
00:39:29.980 wonderful track record
00:39:30.960 of policing, provincial
00:39:32.180 policing in the 1920s
00:39:33.220 all across Canada,
00:39:34.020 particularly Alberta.
00:39:35.420 When it comes to the
00:39:36.540 military, Alberta is
00:39:37.920 between four and five
00:39:39.120 million people.
00:39:40.280 You can look at a
00:39:41.820 half dozen jurisdictions
00:39:42.760 in the United States
00:39:43.780 that have their own
00:39:44.500 reserves, you know,
00:39:45.480 et cetera, some of them
00:39:46.220 dating back into the
00:39:47.040 1600s.
00:39:47.840 You know, we have
00:39:49.920 about a half dozen
00:39:51.520 countries that I compare
00:39:52.760 us to, Ireland, the
00:39:54.940 Moldova, you know,
00:39:58.040 I'm trying to remember
00:39:58.680 all the ones,
00:39:59.140 Switzerland.
00:39:59.780 Croatia was one of them.
00:40:00.760 Croatia was one.
00:40:01.860 Switzerland during the
00:40:02.660 Second World War, very
00:40:03.940 impressive.
00:40:04.540 Its population was just
00:40:05.540 over four million people,
00:40:06.500 almost exactly the same
00:40:07.360 as Alberta.
00:40:08.180 Yet, because of the
00:40:09.100 reserve structure, they
00:40:09.920 could raise 850,000
00:40:11.840 people to counter the
00:40:12.860 Germans, potentially
00:40:13.840 putting two million
00:40:14.640 against their border.
00:40:15.280 That's the creme de la
00:40:17.480 creme of you're having
00:40:18.780 your own, you know,
00:40:19.600 reserve and force to
00:40:21.640 look after yourself.
00:40:23.060 But, you know, some of
00:40:23.900 the others are way more
00:40:24.600 modest, a thousand people,
00:40:25.920 et cetera.
00:40:26.560 The numbers, the math.
00:40:28.200 When you look at, say,
00:40:29.800 for example, policing,
00:40:30.720 Alberta pays about
00:40:31.580 $350 million a year to
00:40:34.060 the federal government
00:40:34.800 for the RCMP.
00:40:36.900 Oh, sorry, it pays about
00:40:38.100 $350 million of its own,
00:40:39.700 okay?
00:40:40.340 And then we pay another
00:40:41.440 $100 million to the
00:40:42.700 federal government for
00:40:43.440 their component.
00:40:44.140 So for $100 million,
00:40:46.560 it sounds like a lot of
00:40:47.560 money, right?
00:40:48.240 But when Alberta sends 0.93
00:40:49.760 $20 billion, some say
00:40:51.720 $40 billion, depending
00:40:52.740 on transfers to Ottawa,
00:40:54.340 all right, so instead
00:40:55.280 we're sending $19,900,000,000
00:40:58.220 or whatever dollars we
00:40:59.300 have to have to play with
00:40:59.940 and you have your own
00:41:00.820 police force accountable
00:41:01.620 to you, well, there's
00:41:03.420 value in that.
00:41:04.900 And with the military,
00:41:06.480 if we had a regular
00:41:08.100 force, say, for example,
00:41:09.200 of 10,000, Canadians,
00:41:11.580 Canada has 67,000 troops
00:41:13.920 across the entire
00:41:14.520 country, that would cost
00:41:15.940 us in terms of payroll
00:41:17.020 about a billion dollars.
00:41:18.600 Well, there you go.
00:41:19.600 For $18.9 billion
00:41:21.520 surplus now, we've used
00:41:22.900 $1.1 billion, we have
00:41:25.120 our own police and our
00:41:25.860 own military.
00:41:26.980 Well, and I'd say it
00:41:27.680 would even be less than
00:41:28.540 that in a lot of ways
00:41:29.380 because the Canadian
00:41:30.620 Armed Forces are paid 0.66
00:41:31.660 in part by federal income
00:41:32.800 tax that Albertans are
00:41:33.780 paying, which if we're to
00:41:35.100 follow this to its
00:41:35.900 logical end and Alberta's
00:41:36.980 not paying that, that
00:41:38.260 money would be in the
00:41:39.280 Alberta Treasury.
00:41:39.980 And I don't want to at
00:41:42.260 all be accused of
00:41:44.060 comparing Canada to
00:41:45.180 China and Alberta to
00:41:46.240 Hong Kong, but I do
00:41:47.760 think that the one
00:41:48.680 thing that is
00:41:49.760 interesting in this
00:41:50.540 dialogue is that Hong
00:41:51.960 Kong and the people of
00:41:53.420 Hong Kong have
00:41:54.020 certainly seen what
00:41:54.900 happens when your law
00:41:56.580 enforcement body is not
00:41:57.680 really in your domestic
00:41:58.680 control.
00:41:59.440 And again, I don't see
00:42:01.160 the dynamic as being
00:42:02.180 the same here, but when
00:42:03.660 we do have an
00:42:04.260 independence discussion
00:42:05.180 and we do have a
00:42:05.920 sovereignty discussion
00:42:07.200 and to some, I would
00:42:08.300 say, a sovereignty
00:42:08.860 crisis, having a
00:42:10.800 national police force
00:42:12.240 that is not within your
00:42:14.600 government's control can
00:42:16.760 only be a recipe for
00:42:18.040 trouble.
00:42:19.220 Yeah, well, I've been
00:42:20.100 to Hong Kong and I've
00:42:21.000 been harassed by, you
00:42:22.420 know, the mainlander
00:42:23.300 police or what they've
00:42:24.480 done to infuse that
00:42:25.980 situation.
00:42:26.540 I remember I was there,
00:42:27.580 I was told, for example,
00:42:29.400 that my hotel room was
00:42:30.380 no longer available to me
00:42:31.520 because I was there for
00:42:32.120 a Falun Gong human 0.99
00:42:33.760 rights event.
00:42:34.900 And it turns out my
00:42:36.400 room key still worked
00:42:37.240 and everything else, but
00:42:37.880 the hotel was threatened
00:42:38.860 if they didn't shut us
00:42:39.900 out and get rid of us. 1.00
00:42:40.900 You know, the incredible,
00:42:43.500 you know, scare tactics
00:42:45.780 that go on in Hong Kong
00:42:46.600 and I saw that years ago.
00:42:48.340 But yeah, I, you know,
00:42:49.740 if we get out of a
00:42:50.720 contract with the RCMP, I
00:42:52.000 even think about it from
00:42:52.680 the perspective of the
00:42:54.240 police officers.
00:42:55.920 You know, right now
00:42:57.240 there's the whole, you
00:42:58.340 know, official bilingualism.
00:42:59.860 How many guys, gals in 1.00
00:43:01.340 Alberta, you know, speak
00:43:02.540 French would have to learn 1.00
00:43:03.760 that to become a part of
00:43:04.800 the RCMP, et cetera.
00:43:06.860 They get to stay closer
00:43:08.040 to home, which means you
00:43:09.380 better understand the
00:43:10.380 crime scenario, et cetera,
00:43:11.660 and the players.
00:43:13.460 You know, another factor
00:43:14.760 is the RCMP is engaged in
00:43:16.360 a tremendous amount of
00:43:17.660 social engineering.
00:43:19.180 Like now, for example,
00:43:20.460 in the RCMP, if you're
00:43:21.480 a white male, in order to
00:43:22.960 get past the first
00:43:23.900 tranche of tests, you
00:43:25.420 have to have 85%.
00:43:26.340 If you're a female, 70%. 1.00
00:43:28.920 If you're anything
00:43:30.320 Aboriginal gender-wise,
00:43:31.860 you know, it's 50%.
00:43:32.800 We should be hiring the 1.00
00:43:34.840 best people for the job.
00:43:36.180 None of this, you know,
00:43:37.360 social engineering types of
00:43:38.380 stuff.
00:43:38.660 So there's all sorts of
00:43:39.940 reasons why, you know,
00:43:42.360 I think it makes sense for
00:43:43.360 us to go a provincial
00:43:44.420 route.
00:43:45.620 You know, in the High River
00:43:46.820 scenario, you know, one of
00:43:49.060 the things that happened
00:43:49.880 there was, I first off
00:43:52.260 asked a question when I got
00:43:53.100 the talking points from the
00:43:54.000 Prime Minister's office,
00:43:55.020 and I thought, well, who
00:43:56.020 the hell ordered this?
00:43:57.640 Did we, did the federal
00:43:59.040 government give the
00:44:00.120 authorization?
00:44:00.500 Because that was, just for
00:44:01.500 people not familiar, that
00:44:02.520 was a case of RCMP
00:44:03.680 officers going into
00:44:04.600 people's homes, stealing
00:44:05.500 their guns under the
00:44:06.800 guise of, quote-unquote,
00:44:07.760 protecting them.
00:44:08.400 Correct.
00:44:08.880 Without warrants, you
00:44:10.140 know, illegally, right,
00:44:12.020 without sanction of law.
00:44:14.040 And so, anyhow, I asked
00:44:16.340 questions to the Prime
00:44:17.100 Minister's office, and we
00:44:17.920 got questions, we got
00:44:18.620 answers back within a half
00:44:19.660 hour saying, no, we
00:44:20.720 didn't authorize it.
00:44:22.140 Okay.
00:44:22.740 So that's troubling, okay,
00:44:24.640 because normally people
00:44:25.480 would expect that the RCMP
00:44:26.280 is busting indoors, taking
00:44:27.200 guns.
00:44:27.820 The Fed signed off on it,
00:44:29.120 right?
00:44:29.480 Well, in this case, we
00:44:30.220 didn't, but we had a
00:44:31.260 couple ministers in the
00:44:32.200 province of Alberta who
00:44:33.440 improperly gave instruction
00:44:35.580 to do so.
00:44:36.160 You mean provincial
00:44:36.660 ministers?
00:44:37.080 Yeah.
00:44:37.660 Yeah.
00:44:37.980 So doesn't that work
00:44:40.340 against the point you're
00:44:41.260 making, though?
00:44:41.820 Yeah.
00:44:41.840 No, I get it.
00:44:42.320 That if there was an
00:44:42.840 Alberta police force, bad
00:44:44.380 decisions can still be made.
00:44:45.220 Yeah, you're right.
00:44:46.500 Bad decisions can still be
00:44:47.580 made, but the problem in
00:44:48.660 the previous scenario was
00:44:49.840 that people assumed that
00:44:52.440 the instruction came from
00:44:53.500 the federal government.
00:44:54.080 Absolutely.
00:44:54.780 Okay.
00:44:55.320 So if it's an Alberta
00:44:56.860 provincial police force,
00:44:58.080 there's no assumption
00:44:58.860 there.
00:44:59.140 There's no muddying of the
00:45:00.060 waters, right?
00:45:01.100 The premier, or in this
00:45:03.020 case, would have been
00:45:03.460 Alison Redford, or a
00:45:04.960 minister like Doug
00:45:05.860 Griffiths or Jonathan
00:45:08.060 Dennis would be held
00:45:09.200 responsible for that.
00:45:10.560 As it was, the thing got
00:45:12.220 brushed under the rug,
00:45:13.900 obfuscation, there were
00:45:15.380 some early retirement
00:45:16.880 packages for some of the
00:45:17.880 RCMP that were involved
00:45:18.920 with senior officers, et
00:45:20.080 cetera, and it just kind of
00:45:21.060 went away.
00:45:21.480 Let's use another example
00:45:23.020 because this one's really
00:45:24.720 in terms of provincial
00:45:25.620 federal, you know, conflict.
00:45:28.480 You had that Polish 1.00
00:45:29.800 immigrant who was tasered
00:45:32.300 to death in the airport
00:45:34.280 in Vancouver.
00:45:36.180 Okay.
00:45:36.520 BC asked twice for an 0.54
00:45:39.180 inquiry into his death.
00:45:41.160 Okay.
00:45:41.380 And twice the federal
00:45:42.500 government, which controls
00:45:43.980 the RCMP, right, said no.
00:45:46.860 So that's an example where,
00:45:48.980 yeah, if you want to look
00:45:50.420 into something and you've
00:45:51.720 got the feds saying, no,
00:45:52.760 we don't care about that,
00:45:53.560 we're going to block that,
00:45:54.560 you know, you get rid of
00:45:55.660 that.
00:45:56.740 I think there is value to
00:45:58.360 it.
00:45:59.860 I, you know, when it comes
00:46:01.540 to, you know, say, for
00:46:02.680 example, what Trudeau is
00:46:03.500 doing now with 1,500 types
00:46:05.640 of varieties of firearms
00:46:07.060 that by order and council
00:46:08.460 he's going to say are now
00:46:09.900 illegal, they were legal
00:46:10.960 before, and, you know, the
00:46:13.840 RCMP is the federal force
00:46:15.420 that can be, you know, sent
00:46:17.040 to your house to
00:46:17.760 investigate whether or not
00:46:18.700 you've got these, what
00:46:19.480 you've done with them.
00:46:20.260 Well, and the RCMP has
00:46:21.460 also been the beneficiary
00:46:22.580 of an outsourcing of the
00:46:23.860 classifications.
00:46:24.940 So they now have been
00:46:26.700 granted a legislative
00:46:27.820 mandate effectively that
00:46:29.060 they don't actually have.
00:46:30.260 Yeah.
00:46:30.660 And I've been a big
00:46:31.520 advocate of having a chief
00:46:32.840 firearms officer in the
00:46:33.860 province of Alberta that
00:46:34.600 is elected by license
00:46:37.000 owners in the province of
00:46:38.000 Alberta.
00:46:38.280 So if you have a gun
00:46:38.960 license in the province
00:46:39.800 of Alberta, you should be
00:46:41.200 able to elect who your
00:46:42.560 chief firearms officer is.
00:46:43.740 And that means that you're
00:46:44.740 probably not going to have
00:46:45.480 a chief firearms officer
00:46:46.200 who's shutting down gun
00:46:48.880 ranges that have been
00:46:49.580 around for decades because
00:46:51.360 of some, you know, busy
00:46:52.500 body complaining and coming
00:46:53.760 by and saying, oh, what's
00:46:54.740 what's the status with your
00:46:55.680 berm and, you know, this
00:46:56.980 type of thing.
00:46:57.760 And as well, not giving
00:46:59.540 authorization for a police
00:47:00.960 force to say, oh, you know,
00:47:02.360 you're on this registry or
00:47:03.820 this registry that doesn't
00:47:04.720 exist anymore.
00:47:05.920 And, you know, we're going
00:47:07.460 to start snooping around and
00:47:08.640 looking through the records
00:47:09.400 of the gun dealers in town.
00:47:10.720 And, oh, by the way, you
00:47:11.940 have something on this order
00:47:13.320 and council BS list that
00:47:14.860 the prime minister produced
00:47:15.900 to cough it up, buddy.
00:47:17.500 You know, we don't need
00:47:18.380 that.
00:47:19.180 So when we talk about, I
00:47:20.380 mean, just the policing
00:47:21.320 aspect, repatriating
00:47:22.640 Alberta's police to a new
00:47:24.300 provincial force, that's
00:47:26.160 something that, in your
00:47:26.880 view, could and should be
00:47:28.180 done regardless of, you
00:47:30.540 know, if Alberta's in or
00:47:31.380 out of Confederation.
00:47:32.220 Absolutely.
00:47:32.960 And you think it could be
00:47:33.760 done relatively quickly.
00:47:35.440 Yeah.
00:47:35.700 Well, according to the
00:47:37.520 actual contract we have,
00:47:39.640 Article 3.3, we have to
00:47:42.860 give notice by March 31st
00:47:44.340 of a year and then two
00:47:45.780 years hence.
00:47:46.600 So in our case, you know,
00:47:48.540 March 31st of next year,
00:47:50.000 by then we would give
00:47:50.820 notice and then two years
00:47:52.160 hence we would be out of
00:47:53.060 the contract.
00:47:53.920 However, historically, when
00:47:55.400 the federal government
00:47:56.220 wanted to get out of
00:47:57.320 policing in the First
00:47:58.240 World War because it was 0.89
00:47:58.920 costing them money and
00:47:59.740 they wanted to save
00:48:00.200 money, put it toward the
00:48:01.120 war effort over in Europe,
00:48:02.900 what they did is within a
00:48:04.920 year, the federal
00:48:06.020 government around the time
00:48:06.840 of the budget basically
00:48:07.720 said, what can you guys do
00:48:09.000 about this?
00:48:09.700 And by the time of the
00:48:10.440 next federal budget, Alberta
00:48:11.760 already had a provincial
00:48:12.480 police force and it was
00:48:13.200 done, so within a year.
00:48:15.360 So where do you see the
00:48:16.800 big sticking points truly
00:48:18.360 being?
00:48:18.900 Because it sounds like
00:48:19.840 Alberta could have its
00:48:20.840 own pension plan, Alberta
00:48:22.000 could have its own
00:48:22.800 police force, Alberta
00:48:24.020 could have its own
00:48:24.660 revenue agency, and a lot
00:48:26.460 of these things are not
00:48:27.540 new ideas.
00:48:28.560 They've been proposed
00:48:29.260 going back to the
00:48:30.000 firewall letter almost
00:48:30.880 20 years ago, they've
00:48:31.860 been proposed by MPs
00:48:33.260 and MLAs.
00:48:34.460 I mean, why has there
00:48:36.200 not been traction on this?
00:48:37.440 I think you've had a lot
00:48:38.500 of people that just
00:48:40.520 haven't had the political
00:48:41.400 will, it's inertia.
00:48:43.980 You know, you've had
00:48:44.900 people who, and some
00:48:46.720 of them are, let's face
00:48:47.640 it, let's talk about
00:48:49.620 Jason Kenney for a
00:48:50.360 second, okay?
00:48:51.620 You know, some people
00:48:52.960 have sugarplum fairies
00:48:54.080 dance in their head about
00:48:55.320 how someday they want to
00:48:56.200 be prime minister.
00:48:57.500 Well, what Alberta wants 0.99
00:48:58.680 right now is a Rennie
00:48:59.500 Levesque of Alberta.
00:49:00.900 We don't want Captain
00:49:01.760 Canada.
00:49:02.800 We're tired of that,
00:49:04.280 right?
00:49:04.920 We've been through
00:49:05.660 enough.
00:49:06.380 Thank you very much.
00:49:07.260 We don't need Captain
00:49:08.320 Canada.
00:49:08.920 We want somebody who's
00:49:09.740 Alberta first, looking
00:49:10.960 after us.
00:49:12.280 Not capitulating to
00:49:14.020 Trudeau over 1,500, you
00:49:16.440 know, gun restrictions,
00:49:18.720 not kicking our money over
00:49:20.160 to Ottawa all the time,
00:49:21.220 et cetera, enough.
00:49:22.580 So, you know, we've had a
00:49:24.100 bunch of premiers in the
00:49:25.640 past.
00:49:26.360 I'll give you an example.
00:49:27.400 Ralph Klein.
00:49:28.500 When I was an early
00:49:29.780 reform MP back in my
00:49:31.440 first term, Paul Martin
00:49:33.000 wanted to raise the
00:49:33.660 pension contributions from
00:49:34.660 5.5 to 9.9% because it
00:49:37.120 was an unfunded liability
00:49:38.180 and the costs were going
00:49:39.260 up and the population was
00:49:40.320 getting older and all this
00:49:41.660 stuff.
00:49:42.660 Mike Harris, God bless him,
00:49:44.940 said, no, Ontario is not
00:49:46.240 part of that.
00:49:47.180 Quebec, which has had their
00:49:48.160 own pension plan for
00:49:48.860 decades, has said, no,
00:49:49.980 we're not part of that.
00:49:51.120 So I and Diana Blonsi went
00:49:53.140 to Ralph Klein, to the
00:49:54.320 Alberta government, and
00:49:55.080 said, all you need is one
00:49:56.600 more province to say out
00:49:57.560 and it's done.
00:49:58.840 Ralph wouldn't do it.
00:50:00.400 He was okay with our
00:50:01.820 contribution rates going
00:50:02.740 from 5.5 to 9.9.
00:50:05.160 Maybe because he had a
00:50:06.280 personal disagreement with
00:50:07.140 Preston Manning.
00:50:08.680 Maybe because he felt it
00:50:09.940 was patriotic, I don't
00:50:10.920 know.
00:50:11.540 But Alberta at that time
00:50:13.020 had a lower unemployment
00:50:15.060 rate.
00:50:15.620 We had a younger
00:50:16.180 demographic, which is still
00:50:17.300 the case.
00:50:18.900 And we would have paid
00:50:20.200 half the amount of money
00:50:21.560 and had a better pension
00:50:23.220 than what the CPP could
00:50:25.020 offer us.
00:50:25.720 And that's with having the
00:50:26.760 Ponzi scheme account the
00:50:28.020 way it is.
00:50:28.680 If we had individualized
00:50:30.000 accounts, like you have in
00:50:31.340 Chile, for example, which
00:50:32.680 Milton Friedman advocated,
00:50:34.760 wow, how much better would
00:50:36.760 we be?
00:50:37.700 You know, if you ask the
00:50:38.780 average Canadian now, you
00:50:40.040 say, well, what did you put
00:50:40.820 into CPP last year?
00:50:42.320 What do you have in
00:50:43.060 aggregate?
00:50:43.800 What was your return on
00:50:44.620 investment?
00:50:45.360 Smart people probably don't
00:50:46.660 know.
00:50:47.360 But if you go to Santiago,
00:50:48.660 Chile, you walk down the 1.00
00:50:49.480 street, they know what's in
00:50:51.380 there.
00:50:52.480 And just to interject there,
00:50:54.180 no one would ever accept,
00:50:56.140 if they worked for a company
00:50:57.340 that had a corporate pension
00:50:58.880 plan, no one would ever
00:50:59.780 accept the accounting of
00:51:01.080 that being done the way it
00:51:02.140 is for the federal
00:51:02.700 government.
00:51:03.580 I mean, I like getting my
00:51:04.780 statements when I work for a
00:51:05.840 company that had a pension
00:51:06.580 plan, and I know how much is
00:51:07.720 in there.
00:51:08.160 And I mean, no one would ever
00:51:09.200 fly for a company saying,
00:51:10.440 oh, yeah, just give us this
00:51:11.600 and we'll give it to you out of
00:51:13.140 the pool when it's time.
00:51:13.900 And for people who ask all these
00:51:15.900 persnickety little questions,
00:51:17.120 oh, what about this pension and
00:51:18.300 what about the parks and what
00:51:19.200 about the, you know, at the end
00:51:20.940 of the day, here's how it cuts
00:51:22.400 down real simple.
00:51:23.600 Who would you rather have
00:51:24.640 accountable for paying the bill,
00:51:26.360 Alberta or Ottawa?
00:51:28.060 Who's got the capacity?
00:51:29.440 I would far rather have Alberta in 0.97
00:51:30.980 charge of a pension system than
00:51:32.500 Ottawa, because who's more
00:51:33.760 fiscally solvent, right?
00:51:35.280 Who's got the oil?
00:51:36.180 Who's got the coal?
00:51:38.940 You know, Alberta.
00:51:40.500 So for all those people who
00:51:41.960 worry about this, you know, if,
00:51:42.980 if I have a friend of mine,
00:51:44.120 for example, lives down in
00:51:44.940 Arizona, he's collecting a
00:51:46.660 Canadian federal pension.
00:51:48.260 OK, no problems, no issues.
00:51:50.340 OK, but for the for the for the
00:51:52.400 for the people who are 35 and
00:51:54.080 younger, right, you say, OK,
00:51:55.560 we're going to do a new thing.
00:51:57.140 You know, Alberta is going to 1.00
00:51:58.060 have a pension system, et cetera.
00:51:59.360 This is how it's going to work,
00:52:00.360 et cetera.
00:52:00.920 I like the idea of a super RRSP
00:52:02.980 where three percent of your
00:52:04.360 salary, you know, maybe your
00:52:06.000 employer matches it for six
00:52:07.140 percent.
00:52:07.740 OK, get set aside in this thing.
00:52:09.660 You can draw on it for your
00:52:11.200 first house if you become an
00:52:12.900 unemployed, you know, obviously
00:52:14.820 if you retire, you know, these
00:52:17.040 types of things.
00:52:17.920 And I think we would be way
00:52:19.580 better off under a system like
00:52:21.000 that, you know, because whether
00:52:21.980 you're janitor or president of
00:52:23.240 something, that's what you're
00:52:25.000 getting.
00:52:25.460 And, you know, something's
00:52:26.460 really there and it's not this
00:52:27.980 government run Ponzi scene.
00:52:30.520 Politicians make terrible
00:52:31.440 bankers.
00:52:32.260 It's the argument I've always had
00:52:33.180 about the Alberta Heritage
00:52:34.340 Savings Trust Fund because it
00:52:35.860 was used to buy the votes from
00:52:37.220 Atlantic Canada with the 0.98
00:52:38.600 constitutional negotiations for,
00:52:40.180 you know, below market rates.
00:52:41.940 Politicians don't make good
00:52:43.100 bankers.
00:52:43.760 I trust you with your money
00:52:44.840 more than politicians.
00:52:46.100 Well, thank you very much for
00:52:47.020 that.
00:52:47.800 It was good to have you in
00:52:48.820 politics and great to have you
00:52:49.900 sitting down with me now.
00:52:51.040 Rob Anderson.
00:52:51.480 Good chatting.
00:52:51.940 Thank you, sir.
00:52:52.700 Now, I did a couple of other
00:52:53.920 interviews at the conference
00:52:55.180 last weekend that we'll have
00:52:56.340 coming out in future episodes
00:52:57.860 of the show, but they don't fit
00:52:59.000 into that subject of Western
00:53:01.140 alienation as clearly as the
00:53:02.880 ones we've done in these two
00:53:04.520 parts have.
00:53:05.160 I hope you've taken something
00:53:06.260 out of this.
00:53:07.240 Certainly it's a dialogue that I
00:53:08.800 don't want to die down.
00:53:10.040 It's one that is going to be an
00:53:12.300 issue and it's going to put some
00:53:14.060 change forward, but what that
00:53:16.320 looks like still stands to be
00:53:17.800 seen.
00:53:18.360 Is the change going to be Alberta
00:53:20.260 leaving Confederation?
00:53:21.560 Is the change going to be
00:53:22.760 discontent in the West?
00:53:24.320 Is the change just going to be
00:53:25.840 people in the West voting a
00:53:27.840 different way because they are
00:53:29.260 going to be voting along lines of
00:53:31.100 securing a better deal rather than
00:53:33.380 traditional left-right grounds?
00:53:35.040 I don't quite know, but what I do
00:53:37.080 know as we see from the
00:53:38.200 anniversary of the firewall
00:53:39.360 letter, as we see from the
00:53:41.380 mounting concerns and the fair
00:53:43.060 deal panel meetings, the anger
00:53:45.200 is not subsiding.
00:53:46.800 The anger is not going away.
00:53:49.000 And that means that it has to go
00:53:50.480 somewhere and it has to be
00:53:52.000 channeled somewhere.
00:53:53.160 And look, the 2023 election in
00:53:55.020 Alberta is a long way away.
00:53:56.740 The 2023 federal election, if
00:53:59.000 that's when it is, is a long way
00:54:00.740 away, although the federal election
00:54:02.220 could be much, much sooner given a
00:54:04.360 minority parliament.
00:54:05.320 So the question that a lot of
00:54:07.120 people have is if Justin Trudeau
00:54:08.920 were to lose, if a conservative who
00:54:10.600 is a big supporter of the West
00:54:12.180 were to get in, would that be
00:54:13.900 enough?
00:54:14.720 I don't think it would because,
00:54:16.700 well, there is a left-right divide
00:54:18.260 here.
00:54:18.740 It's not cleanly about political
00:54:20.860 ideology.
00:54:21.900 In a lot of cases, it is entirely
00:54:23.680 about Alberta getting, we'll use that
00:54:26.680 term again, a fair deal or at the
00:54:28.780 very least a fairer deal.
00:54:30.680 So unless someone is prepared to come
00:54:32.380 in and do the heavy lifting on this
00:54:34.980 file, even a new conservative prime
00:54:37.440 minister, say, wouldn't be enough on
00:54:40.020 its own.
00:54:41.300 And I say on its own.
00:54:42.400 There's not a single member of the
00:54:44.340 conservative leadership race right
00:54:45.820 now that is from the West.
00:54:47.720 There are conservative MPs from the
00:54:49.140 West.
00:54:49.640 So obviously elevating one of them to a
00:54:52.180 senior position would be a step in
00:54:54.420 the right direction.
00:54:55.540 But no one that is coming who innately
00:54:57.980 understands these concerns is in the
00:55:00.760 race.
00:55:01.140 So even in the conservative party, a
00:55:03.680 lot of people in the West are saying
00:55:04.980 they're not represented.
00:55:06.160 And that's something to keep an eye on
00:55:07.360 as well.
00:55:08.120 My thanks to all of you who sat down
00:55:10.000 for this series.
00:55:10.920 And of course, all of you who watched
00:55:12.140 it or listened to it.
00:55:13.320 We'll be back next week with more of
00:55:15.520 The Andrew Lawton Show here on True
00:55:17.080 North.
00:55:17.440 Thank you.
00:55:17.940 God bless and good day.
00:55:19.540 Thanks for listening to The Andrew
00:55:20.740 Lawton Show.
00:55:21.580 Support the program by donating to
00:55:23.200 True North at www.tnc.news.
00:55:30.760 www.tnc.news.co.uk
00:55:42.760 www.tnc.news.co.uk
00:55:43.760 www.tnc. definesburgs.co.uk
00:55:47.600 www.tnc.ckin.com
00:55:51.100 www.tnc.news.co.uk