Juno News - November 08, 2019
Trans activism vs. Women's rights? An interview with Meghan Murphy
Episode Stats
Words per minute
173.70586
Harmful content
Misogyny
46
sentences flagged
Hate speech
19
sentences flagged
Summary
Megan Murphy is a journalist and the founder and editor of Feminist Current. She speaks regularly to the public about women s rights and gender identity legislation. In 2017, she spoke to the Canadian Senate about Bill C-16, which enshrined gender identity into Canadian law, and recently she spoke in the Scottish Parliament about gender identity laws.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hi everyone, I'm Lindsay with True North. Today my guest is Megan Murphy. Megan is a journalist
00:00:14.760
and the founder and editor of Feminist Current. She speaks regularly to the public about women's
00:00:20.400
rights and gender identity legislation. In 2017, she spoke to the Canadian Senate about Bill C-16
00:00:27.540
which enshrined gender identity into Canadian law and recently she spoke in Scottish Parliament
00:00:34.580
about gender identity legislation. So hi Megan. Hey, thanks for having me on. So we first met,
00:00:41.900
I think it was about a year ago now, in October 2018. So I invited you to speak at Wilfrid Laurier
00:00:48.300
University because I had, while I was a graduate student, I had the Laurier Society for Open Inquiry
00:00:55.300
and I had a couple people recommend you as a speaker and so I invited you, but Laurier decided
00:01:02.260
they were going to charge, I think it was $8,055 in security fees, which is ridiculous. And I remember
00:01:10.340
I sent you an email and I said, I was becoming really demoralized because I was like, I can't
00:01:15.860
get this $8,000. And I sent you an email and I said, I think we need to call off this event.
00:01:21.260
And then I remember you replied and you were like, I don't think we should do that. And I thought,
00:01:26.240
okay, okay, we can't. And so I found another venue, I think that same night,
00:01:31.060
for significantly less money, still a little bit because of security fees. That is all to say
00:01:36.240
you are controversial. Why is that? I've never been able to figure it out really.
00:01:42.560
I mean, I don't think I'm saying anything controversial. I think that what is controversial
00:01:53.240
is often based on hearsay more than what I actually say. But I mean, of course, in this
00:02:00.300
situation, it's because I am one of the only people in Canada, particularly one of the only
00:02:08.080
feminists in Canada, you know, who have been speaking out about this publicly. You know,
0.98
00:02:12.980
I went to the Senate to testify against Bill C-16 because I felt that that legislation could
00:02:20.220
harm women and girls. And so how it's perceived by, you know, activists and by a lot of people
00:02:28.900
on the left, I suppose, is that I'm opposed to trans rights or, you know, I don't want trans
1.00
00:02:36.200
identified people to have rights and stuff like that, when really that's not the case.
00:02:40.420
I mean, of course, I want everyone to have rights. But I have concerns about how gender
0.98
00:02:46.740
identity legislation impacts women and girls. And we're sort of seeing these fears and these
00:02:53.340
predictions that myself and other feminists have expressed come true. The case of Jessica
00:03:00.880
slash Jonathan Yaniv is a great example. I'll explain in case anyone in your audience isn't
00:03:07.820
aware, although probably many of them are. So Jonathan, who became Jessica not very long ago,
00:03:16.240
you know, he was he was going by the name Jonathan on social media in November when he had me banned
00:03:22.000
from Twitter and then switched over to Jessica shortly thereafter, had gone around to some local
00:03:28.040
estheticians here in the Vancouver area and requested a Brazilian bikini wax. And of course,
00:03:35.820
he's male. So these estheticians not only were not trained to perform that service, you know,
00:03:43.980
it's a different it's a totally different thing. You I believe I mean, I've never performed a Brazilian
0.99
00:03:50.340
bikini wax myself and definitely not on a man. But I guess you need like a different kind of wax and
0.62
00:03:58.140
you need a different kind of training and etc. And moreover, most of these women were working out of
1.00
00:04:04.020
their homes. And they didn't want to touch a man's genitals. They didn't want a naked man in their home
1.00
00:04:10.380
alone with them, which should be totally reasonable. But because we're now living during a time where if a man
0.94
00:04:18.760
says that he's a woman, we have to accept that no questions asked, he was able to accuse these women,
00:04:25.760
many of whom are immigrant women, many of whom English wasn't their first language. And of course,
00:04:34.720
these are not, you know, wealthy, powerful people. These are women who are working independently. And he
0.99
00:04:40.080
was able to accuse them of transphobia and so dragged a whole bunch of these women to the BC Human Rights
0.99
00:04:45.680
Tribunal claiming that he was discriminated against based on gender identity. And, you know,
00:04:51.980
this is this is one example. There's also the the the reality that there are men being transferred to
00:04:58.640
female prisons and there's sexual harassment and sexual assault happening as a result of that.
1.00
00:05:04.640
We're seeing men win sports competitions against women because they're competing as women based on
0.99
00:05:12.320
their identification, their identity, I should say. And, you know, we're seeing men have access to
00:05:19.700
women's shelters and women having to leave because they feel unsafe or because they're actually accused
00:05:25.400
of transphobia when they protest. And, you know, this is exactly the purpose of regardless of what people
0.54
00:05:34.980
say the purpose is, the real purpose or at least the real result of gender identity legislation is that
00:05:40.480
any man at all can say he's a woman and we all have to accept it. And if we say no, we're guilty of discrimination.
00:05:46.480
So you're just trying to say, let women have their spaces, let them have their prisons, their shelters, their
1.00
00:05:54.100
sports, trans women or trans individuals, they can have their own separate spaces. Is that kind of to summarize
0.97
00:06:01.360
really briefly your position? I mean, sure. Like if I mean, to me, it's not really about trans people. It's really about
00:06:08.480
males because I don't have any interest in keeping females who identify as trans out of women's spaces.
0.84
00:06:16.800
It's just that some women's spaces are for women and girls only because those spaces are spaces where
1.00
00:06:23.920
women and girls might be particularly vulnerable. So it's appropriate for males not to be allowed access.
00:06:30.080
And whether they identify as trans or not really doesn't matter to me. I mean, trans identity doesn't
1.00
00:06:36.720
necessarily mean anything. I mean, it doesn't mean you've had surgery. It doesn't mean you're on hormones.
00:06:41.680
Not that I necessarily think those things would change anything, but we would we could have that
00:06:46.640
conversation if that were the case. But it's purely based on self declaration. Right. And yeah, I just I
00:06:56.400
gender identity and sex cannot coexist. And because women's rights are sex based, gender identity legislation
0.99
00:07:04.960
inherently nullifies women's sex based rights. You know, like either sex is immutable. It's a material
0.99
00:07:12.160
reality. You can't change it or it's whatever anyone says it is. And sex is based on your own desire or
00:07:21.120
perception or identity. So there's this popular mantra, trans women are women. So I would be more of the view that
00:07:29.760
trans women are trans women. They're not women, but they're trans women. Would you be more of the view
00:07:35.520
like me that trans women are trans women or that trans women are men? Well, trans women are male. And I mean,
0.99
00:07:42.080
there's nothing wrong with saying that. And I don't really care how someone wants to identify in their
00:07:46.960
personal life. You know, if if a man wants to identify as transgender or as a trans woman, if he wants to
00:07:54.960
change his name, if he wants to, you know, dress like a woman, whatever that means, that's fine.
00:08:03.200
I don't care. But you know, once you start creating legislation around those ideas, of course, that
00:08:08.320
changes everything, which is why I started talking about it. But you know, as I said, I mean, there's no
00:08:14.640
what you know, what is a trans woman that what does that mean? You know, what's the difference between
1.00
00:08:19.200
a trans woman and a male? That's a question I asked often and one that I was punished by Twitter for
00:08:24.800
asking. Actually, they forced me to delete a tweet asking, you know, and I wasn't trying to be
00:08:28.960
antagonistic. I'm trying to I'm trying to make a point. I'm trying to get somewhere with this,
00:08:33.920
you know, I'm saying, okay, what is it that happens between male and trans woman? What changes there?
00:08:40.640
You know, how are we defining a trans woman? So, yes, you're banned from Twitter still. What is it
00:08:47.040
exactly that got you banned from Twitter? What were the problematic tweets here? Well, I was I was made to
00:08:54.160
delete a bunch of tweets. But I wasn't banned for those tweets. They just, you know, locked my
00:09:00.240
account and said, you have to delete these or you can't get back on. And I was like, didn't understand
00:09:04.640
why I had to delete these tweets because they weren't hateful. But I was like, okay, whatever,
00:09:08.960
I'll delete my tweets. And, you know, one of them was for saying men are women, which wasn't I mean,
00:09:18.080
people lie about this all the time. And Twitter has lied about this, actually. But I wasn't that wasn't
00:09:23.280
directed at any individual. I was in the middle of a conversation with somebody on Twitter, who I
00:09:28.160
don't know, I don't believe they were trans. I have no idea if they were, it was just an avatar.
0.98
00:09:34.000
And, you know, I said, but men aren't women in response to what we were talking about. I wasn't
00:09:39.200
saying to any individual, you're a man, not a woman or something like that. And then in that conversation,
00:09:48.000
I also asked what's the difference between a man and a trans woman, again, trying to get at this
00:09:53.120
point that, you know, it's like, how are we defining these words? What does this mean?
00:09:57.120
And so they locked down my account and made me delete those tweets. And then, of course,
00:10:01.600
all this stuff happened or had begun to happen with Yaniv. And somebody published a blog post
00:10:10.960
revealing his identity and revealing that he behaved in predatorial ways towards girls and, you know,
00:10:18.960
revealed that this was kind of his M.O. Like he would go around to businesses and kind of try to extort
00:10:24.480
money out of them or, you know, free food or something like that by filing all these complaints
00:10:29.920
or pretending he was treated badly or discriminated against, blah, blah, blah. You know, basically a
00:10:35.840
scam artist. And so I tweeted the link to that post and said, is it true? You know, I was asking for
00:10:43.840
confirmation of her information was correct. I was like, is it true that, you know, because he was
00:10:50.000
being referred to only as J.Y. and the media at that point, his identity was being protected.
00:10:55.520
Is it true that J.Y. is, and I linked to his Twitter handle. And then it was confirmed. I received
00:11:02.880
like a screenshot of a review that he posted on Yelp or something like that saying like, so-and-so did a
00:11:07.600
great job on my bikini wax with his face there and his name there, Jonathan, not Jessica. And so I posted
00:11:14.560
the screenshot and said, and this is all public, this was not hidden information or anything. And I
00:11:20.880
said, yeah, it's him. And so I was banned, I assume for misgendering, which wasn't actually an official
00:11:29.840
rule on Twitter at the time. They changed the rules later that evening after they banned me.
00:11:35.440
And it kind of quietly became a rule. Yeah. Yeah. Like they didn't announce
00:11:39.760
it to users. And the first report on the actual change came like half an hour after I was banned
00:11:45.280
on Pink News, which I found rather mysterious. So what's interesting is I misgendered the same
00:11:51.280
individual, Yaniv, and I called Yaniv a fat, ugly man. I never received confirmation that that was why,
00:11:59.680
but I was suspended. Yeah. Permanently after that. But after a few people, uh, you know,
00:12:06.560
with their verified check mark spoke out and asked, you know, why am I banned? I was actually brought
00:12:11.600
back. So it was a permanent suspension because I had had enough temporary suspensions. Um, but they still,
00:12:17.920
they're very inconsistent, right? Twitter, this is the thing. They're unaccountable and they're inconsistent.
00:12:21.680
Why was I brought back within days, but you brought it to court, your ban and you lost. And now you're in
00:12:30.080
the appeal process. Yeah. And I, I appealed the decision when it happened. Um, I, a whole bunch
00:12:38.640
of people complained about it online, you know, like, it's not like they didn't get feedback about
00:12:45.040
that. Um, I asked many times, like, why was I banned? Like, what rule did I broke break? And I
00:12:51.280
just got these like form answers saying you broke the rule against hateful conduct. And then, you know,
00:12:56.480
this was the only tweet that they offered me as reason for my, my banning. Right. And I was like,
00:13:03.360
this isn't a hateful tweet. I wasn't attacking anyone. Um, he was using his male pronouns on Twitter
00:13:09.040
at the time. Like, I don't know. It seems, I mean, yes, inconsistent and unaccountable is
00:13:14.560
exactly right with regard to Twitter, but you know, it seems like they're just specifically
00:13:20.080
punishing me or, and you know, Yaniv has taken credit for this banning. So it was his,
00:13:26.880
his responsibility. So this guy who's a predatory guy who, um, you know, harassed, tried to extort
00:13:37.440
money out of, out of these women. Um, you know, he's, he's not a good guy. Right. And why does he
00:13:43.840
have the power to have women silenced online in that way? And to me, you know, like, it's like,
00:13:49.280
yeah, it might not seem like a big deal to get banned from Twitter. But for me, like, I'm an
00:13:52.800
independent writer and journalist, like the only way that I have to, you know, I'm not working for any
00:13:59.360
kind of institution or company. Like, this is a really important way for me to communicate with my
00:14:03.120
audience. Um, it's a really important way to communicate and connect to other writers and
00:14:09.440
editors, sources, things like that. You know, it's how people contact each other. Like it's
00:14:14.960
harder to get in touch with people if you don't have access to Twitter, if they're just people
00:14:18.800
that you don't know, you know what I mean? And beyond that, like, it's like the level of libel
00:14:25.200
that happens to me online constantly that I'm not able to defend myself against. And, you know,
00:14:30.800
people say the most horrible, untrue things about me and I can't say anything and it circulates and
00:14:35.280
becomes truth. Um, so, you know, it does feel like it really does have a big impact on me and,
00:14:42.320
and, you know, for Twitter to kind of choose to ban a woman for challenging somebody like Yaniv
00:14:51.040
and for just challenging and questioning these ideas and in not a hateful way and not in an
00:14:57.120
antagonistic way, like in a serious way, you know, obviously I, I care about this issue and there's
00:15:02.240
lots of people who care about this issue. It's not just me, you know, being a provocateur or something
00:15:09.280
like that. It just seems so out of line and, and punitive and petty, to be honest. I mean,
00:15:16.880
they just seem kind of petty at this point. They're like being stubborn about it or something like that.
00:15:22.000
You had a speaking engagement very recently. I think it was October 29th and there was a petition
00:15:28.960
to not let you speak. So what's interesting about this petition I found is that it was written by
00:15:34.080
three women. So it seems like it's women behind your D platforming a lot of the time.
1.00
00:15:40.640
Yeah, it's totally weird. I mean, so I talk a lot about, I mean, first, I guess I should, I, um,
00:15:48.800
I'm glad that you brought up the fact that people are using the Twitter ban as, you know,
00:15:52.160
evidence that I'm hateful because I feel like this Twitter ban had another impact also, which is
00:15:59.360
essentially that, you know, it's almost like a form of libel, right? Like, so people are saying,
00:16:05.120
well, she's so bad. She was banned from Twitter. I mean, first of all, which is a crazy thing for any
0.99
00:16:10.240
progressive or leftist person to say as though some like multi-billion dollar corporate corporation
00:16:15.760
should determine which women get to speak and what kind of political speech or what kind of speech
1.00
00:16:21.520
at all is acceptable. Um, and that they've essentially framed me as, as so bad, you know,
00:16:29.200
worse than any of these other, you know, misogynists and racists and trolls and, you know, worse than all
00:16:34.320
these people who've sent me violent threats and death threats and rape threats on Twitter. I'm worse
00:16:38.640
than all of them for saying, or, you know, for calling a man he. Um, but yeah, like, so I talk a
00:16:48.160
lot about trans activists and trans activism and I want to clarify because people, you know, get
00:16:53.520
confused that I'm not necessarily talking about trans identified people, you know, like trans identified
00:16:58.080
people are not a monolith. I don't think that all trans identified people agree with this kind
00:17:02.800
of activism and these efforts to, you know, platform and, and the threats and the harassment
00:17:09.120
and the intimidation and stuff. But, um, I, you know, I mean activists who advocate gender identity
00:17:16.560
ideology and advocate for gender identity legislation. But yeah, it's like the, the fact that it's so many
00:17:22.640
women who are on board with this and participating in the no platforming and the bullying and the harassment,
00:17:28.240
um, is really kind of baffling because it's like they're working against themselves. You know,
00:17:33.440
it's like I'm fighting for women's rights, women's rights that women fought really hard over a century
00:17:40.160
to, to gain and that are now being, um, rolled back and disappeared because of this trend and this,
00:17:47.600
this really kind of irrational ideology. And I think a lot of it is probably virtue signaling,
00:17:53.680
like that's so big in, in the progressive movement and on the left, um, you sort of like to announce
00:18:02.800
your perfect politics to everyone so you can get a lot of likes. Um, I think there's a lot of cowardice
00:18:09.600
on the left these days, uh, particularly in Canada, um, where people don't want to stand up to their
00:18:16.480
friends. They don't want to piss their friends off. They're afraid of being ostracized and, you know,
00:18:21.360
kicked out of their political groups or their activist groups or their political parties or
00:18:25.520
their unions or whatever. Um, because that really does happen. I mean, there's a, such a cult mentality,
00:18:33.360
um, in these spaces right now where if you don't toe the party line, you're, you're kind of kicked
00:18:41.200
out and banned and ostracized. And I, and you know, that can be really hard. Like it's hard to,
00:18:46.640
to lose your community or to lose your friends. It's certainly hard to lose your job. Um, but at
00:18:52.160
the same time, I mean, I don't think I could live with myself if I went along with lies, especially
00:18:57.360
lies that I felt were harmful just to kind of keep my friends. Right. So with your, um, Toronto Public
00:19:04.880
Library talk, can you, I think there was a protest of 500 people. Is that right? I'm not sure the numbers,
00:19:12.240
but yeah, I mean, it was hundreds of people, like some, the cops said 700, but I don't know if it was
00:19:18.160
that many. That sounds like a bit much to me. So yeah, probably like, I don't know, anywhere from
00:19:22.160
three to 500 people. There were a lot of people out there anyway. Yeah. And I think one of the people
00:19:26.400
who was instrumental in actually making this event happen was Vickery Bowles, who's the chief librarian,
00:19:32.560
um, of the Toronto Public Library. I don't know if it was just that branch or the libraries in general.
00:19:36.880
The library. Yeah. She's the, uh, city librarian for Toronto Public Library. So I, I believe that's
00:19:44.160
for all of the, the Toronto Public Libraries. And, and she was sticking up for your, your speech. Um,
00:19:51.840
so you were invited by a group called Radical Feminists Unite, um, to come speak at the library.
00:19:57.040
And, you know, I'm sure you expect it by now that there are all these calls to have you
00:20:01.600
deplatformed and you're not allowed to speak here. Um, but this librarian was very public
00:20:07.920
about her stance that this event should happen. I'm not going to back down. Um, if Megan Murphy was,
00:20:16.320
you know, violating the criminal code of hate speech, she would have been prosecuted already.
1.00
00:20:20.240
And she hasn't. And I thought that was a great line. I read that in a, in a CBC, uh, interview with
00:20:24.720
Vickrey Bowles. And I think if, if you had a more cowardly librarian, I'm not sure your talk would
00:20:31.200
have happened in Toronto. Yeah. She's incredible. Um, and a lot of people were really proud of what
00:20:40.080
she said and that she stood up in the face of such bullying and said, no, the library exists to have
00:20:47.120
these kinds of conversation, conversations. The library's mandate is to support and protect free
00:20:53.440
speech and free expression. And I'm going to die on this hill. That's what she said. Like, it's so
00:20:59.520
great. And, you know, she said, we determined that Megan isn't in this group, isn't promoting hate
00:21:06.480
or hate speech. Um, and you know, people online called her a fascist, like, which is the most ironic
0.79
00:21:14.560
thing I've ever heard because these people are the ones behaving like fascists. But yeah, I mean, certainly
00:21:20.720
if it was somebody who was more cowardly or who, you know, again, cared more about likability than
00:21:27.360
doing what was right, then maybe we would have lost that venue. Yeah. And what I'm worried about
00:21:33.920
is people from, you know, maybe my generation, let's say, uh, growing into those roles as, you know,
00:21:40.720
a chief librarian, um, when the next generation moves in who are kind of accustomed to,
00:21:47.360
oh, it's okay to not let this person speak. Who cares about free speech? If I don't like it,
00:21:52.400
I can kick it out of the public sphere. Like I have the power to do that. I'm worried about those
00:21:57.120
people coming into positions of power, frankly. I know. I mean, they really, they don't value
00:22:02.720
really important human rights. I mean, they're talking about human rights, but they don't really
00:22:07.200
seem to understand or value rights that are really foundational to a free and democratic society.
00:22:15.360
And it worries me too. I mean, these people spend so much time online that it seems like, and you
00:22:20.960
know, not reading books and they don't seem to understand history. So that's a big part of the
00:22:26.880
reason that they don't understand the importance of these ideas and these rights. Um, they just sort
00:22:31.840
of see what their friends say online. I think, you know, in Canada, there's a lot of like privileged,
00:22:36.880
pretty entitled people who don't seem to realize that in other countries they don't have free speech.
00:22:42.720
And that's a really horrible, scary thing where people can be jailed and murdered for having the
00:22:49.200
wrong political opinion, for speaking out against those in power. Um, and in Canada, people seem to
00:22:55.040
be like, whatever. Yeah. Free speech is for me, but not for you. Um, free speech is fine. So long as,
00:23:01.760
you know, I agree with it, which is of course not how free speech works.
00:23:05.440
And anything notable at the protest in Toronto, was there any, were there any arrests?
00:23:10.000
I don't think there were any arrests. I mean, I saw some of the footage online and I frankly
00:23:15.280
found the protesters quite scary. Um, they were so full of rage and had no idea what they were mad
00:23:23.920
about. You know, like the things that they were saying about me and the things that they were saying,
00:23:28.240
I believed in was doing. I mean, it was just, it had no relation to anything I actually say
00:23:34.480
or believe. And they were screaming at attendees. People were like calling them like misogynist
00:23:41.760
names that I won't say out loud here, but you know, like they were saying really horrible things and
00:23:47.360
being really intimidating and screaming like shame, shame at these people as they're leaving. And these
00:23:52.640
are all just regular people. Most of the audience was women. Most of the audience were just like feminist
0.99
00:23:56.800
women. Um, and they were just being horrible. And you know, I'm really impressed by the people who
1.00
00:24:04.480
showed up because they had to walk through this crowd of hundreds of people screaming at them and
00:24:09.760
bullying them and intimidating them just to come and support this conversation. And I know that it was
00:24:16.880
scary because I talked to women after and they thought it was really scary. You know, like I was
00:24:21.680
taken out the back door. I had to have police escorts and bodyguards and they blocked off the back
00:24:26.560
road with cop cars so that I could get in and out of the building safely. It's just insane.
00:24:32.000
All right, let's move on to the November 2nd event. Um, the panel that featured yourself, Jonathan Kaye,
00:24:39.680
who's the Canadian editor of Quillette and Anna Slats, who's a writer with the Post Millennial. And I was
00:24:45.360
the moderator. Um, so this was supposed to take place at SFU. Had you been coordinating this for a while
00:24:51.680
with the organizer who invited you? Yeah. Um, I'm trying to remember when we started working on this,
00:24:59.520
but you know, it had been months and months and months, a long time, you know, you have to plan
00:25:03.600
these things pretty far in advance if you want a venue. Because we did the room booking through a
00:25:09.680
professor at SFU, Mark Collard, it was his name on the booking. And so at the last minute, two days before
00:25:17.680
the event, he got cold feet. Security had said they were worried about violence. But of course,
00:25:23.680
you know, there's always threats of violence at our events. That's why we have so much security.
00:25:27.840
All the events have been great. There's not been any violence. There's not been disruptions. It's been
00:25:32.640
fine. The protesters stay outside. The attendees are safe. Um, but in any case, he pulled out and we were
00:25:40.400
kind of screwed because we couldn't, you know, there's nothing we could do to negotiate with us,
00:25:46.160
with SFU from a legal standpoint at that point. And you know, it wasn't our name on the booking.
00:25:51.520
So, you know, we had to unfortunately scramble to, you know, call all these venues in Vancouver.
00:26:00.720
Um, most things are booked on a Saturday night with two days notice, but we did eventually get a room
00:26:07.360
at the Pan Pacific, which was awesome because it was a really beautiful room and the Pan Pacific
00:26:11.920
was awesome and the security was great and they totally helped us out. And, um, it turned out to
00:26:17.680
be a really wonderful event and it was a bigger venue. So we were able to open up tickets, you know,
00:26:21.600
it had been sold out for quite a while and all these people were asking about tickets. So we were able to
00:26:28.960
So I remember, um, someone in the audience yelled out, so Jonathan Kaye was speaking and you and him
00:26:35.440
were having like a bit of a back and forth, I suppose. I think this was at that moment where
00:26:40.800
I guess he was more, you know, we have to use pronouns. We have to be respectful. Let's take the
00:26:47.760
high road. Um, and I think someone in the audience yelled out to him, we want to hear women speak.
00:26:55.440
Um, and that was a moment for me where I kind of thought maybe feminism is kind of hostile to men.
1.00
00:27:03.600
And I, I kind of had like a bit of a jolt there where I was like, I don't know if it was like
00:27:08.960
fair to do that. Um, do you get a lot of pushback on being a feminist? I don't really get a lot of
1.00
00:27:15.040
pushback on being a feminist. I don't really think it's very controversial to be a feminist nowadays.
0.69
00:27:19.680
Um, I mean, it's sort of trendy, right? So I guess where, where do you differ from
00:27:24.960
maybe mainstream feminism? Oh, like my kind of feminism.
1.00
00:27:31.120
Yeah. I mean, so like the popular version of feminism nowadays is third wave feminism,
1.00
00:27:38.480
which I don't ascribe to, you know, my, my feminist beliefs include, or arguments include, you know,
00:27:47.280
a critique of pornography and the sex industry, violence against women. And of course now this
00:27:54.080
gender identity ideology. Um, I don't really ascribe to the kind of feminism that is like
00:27:59.120
anything a woman does is a feminist thing. It is inherently powerful or empowered. And like,
1.00
00:28:05.120
if they choose it and any choice a woman makes should be applauded and validated. And I think that's
00:28:11.040
all a bit silly. Um, and you know, third wave feminism has really embraced pornography and
00:28:17.840
embraced prostitution and embraced objectification and, um, all these things that women in the feminist
1.00
00:28:26.320
movement have challenged for a really long time. And beyond that, they also seem to have decided that
00:28:31.200
they want to trash all their foremothers. So they trash the suffragettes, they trash first wave feminists,
1.00
00:28:36.480
they trash second wave feminists, they trash radical feminists. Um, well, they accuse them of being
00:28:45.440
kind of prudish, like anti-sex. Um, they refer to them as white feminists, despite the fact that of
00:28:52.000
course the feminist movement is diverse. Um, and you know, the pearl clutchers, things like that. Um,
00:29:01.120
of course now they, they accuse us of being transphobic. They use words like whore phobic,
00:29:07.200
which is ridiculous because there are lots and lots of women in the feminist movement who have
1.00
00:29:12.240
been in prostitution themselves. You know, there's lots of women that are my friends and women that
1.00
00:29:16.560
I've worked with for years who've been in prostitution. You know, having a critique of
00:29:21.120
sexual exploitation is not having a critique of women who have been prostituted. It's the opposite.
00:29:27.280
Um, so those are some ways that I differ from, from those women. Um, I mean, yeah, feminism is such a
1.00
00:29:35.840
confused term these days. People seem to think it is whatever they say it is, or, you know, think
00:29:41.920
it means all sorts of things. And so it's not, it's sort of almost become not that useful of a term,
00:29:48.400
sadly, because, you know, I would rather at this point, rather than just say a feminist and then let
0.99
00:29:53.920
people make a bunch of assumptions about what that means. I'd rather just explain what my views and
00:29:58.640
my arguments are. And that offers me more freedom too. Like I've sort of become, I always did identify
00:30:05.280
as a feminist and a socialist. Um, and you know, most of that is probably true. If you've asked me
00:30:11.920
about my particular beliefs around things like, you know, healthcare and housing and women's rights
00:30:18.160
and universal daycare and, um, public education and all of those things, but I don't want to be
00:30:26.640
limited by labels or ideologies. So you said women's rights. I was, it seems to me that now women's
00:30:34.880
rights, when people use it, when politicians use it, it kind of just seems to refer to abortion. Is there
00:30:41.680
really anything else to women's rights when we use it now? Well, so for example, um, you know,
00:30:50.080
I mean, women's rights can mean all sorts of things, but of course, like at one point women
1.00
00:30:54.880
weren't allowed to vote and women had to fight for the right to vote. And the reason that they weren't
1.00
00:30:59.600
allowed to vote in part was because they weren't considered people. So once women married, they became
1.00
00:31:06.320
their husbands politically, essentially, and they couldn't own property. And so they basically
00:31:11.360
couldn't kind of exist independently. Um, so we use it today. Are we talking more about just the
00:31:18.000
maintenance about those already won to ensure that women are discriminated based on discriminated
0.75
00:31:24.320
against based on sex. So in the workplace, for example, so that women can't get fired for getting
0.97
00:31:28.480
pregnant or get fired or because they might get pregnant, which is something that used to happen
1.00
00:31:34.160
a lot. And I think still does happen sometimes, to be honest, but you know, that happened a lot
00:31:38.400
pre second wave feminism. Um, you know, in Canada, uh, female firefighters had to, had to fight to
0.99
00:31:47.920
have their own locker rooms because this was an industry that was long dominated by men, of course.
00:31:54.080
So there was only men's locker rooms and women had to use those and they were getting sexually harassed
0.95
00:31:58.800
and sexually assaulted in those spaces. So they only recently kind of won the right to have their own
00:32:04.000
spaces in these places. Um, you know, women having access to when girls in high school having access
1.00
00:32:10.560
to female only sports teams, that's a right that, you know, feminists fought for so that women could
1.00
00:32:15.920
compete on fair ground. And that's a right we see being taken away. We mentioned at the start with
00:32:21.680
women's sports. Um, I'm sure you you're well versed in the case of Rachel McKinnon, who competes in
0.57
00:32:29.200
masters cycling races. So Rachel is a trans woman who competes in the women's races and breaks world
1.00
00:32:37.360
records. Um, so I guess that's the kind of thing that you're saying maybe shouldn't be happening.
00:32:43.920
Yeah, definitely. I mean, again, this is, it's so strange even to have this conversation because,
00:32:50.240
you know, it's weird to have to say male and female bodies are different. They are, uh, you can't
00:32:56.880
change a male male body into a female body. Um, even if you decrease testosterone, which is what
00:33:03.040
they're saying in all these, you know, sports organizations or whatever. It's like, well,
00:33:07.600
if a man identifies as trans and reduces his testosterone, then he can, he can compete fairly
00:33:14.160
against women. And that's not true. I mean, he's still developed as a man and men have more muscle
00:33:18.320
mass. They're generally taller. They have longer limbs. They have bigger organs. I mean, and there's all
00:33:24.880
sorts of other ways that male bodies are different than female bodies. Of course,
00:33:28.080
if you understand how reproduction works, then you would understand that also. Um,
00:33:33.520
and it's just ridiculous. I mean, it's just a total joke that a man can say, I'm a woman
00:33:41.280
and compete against women in, you know, track or whatever and win and be setting what these are
00:33:46.720
men who would be, you know, mediocre athletes if they were competing against men. But you know,
00:33:51.280
what a great loophole. So you've mentioned the leftists and progressives, they are not on board
00:33:57.840
with your opinions generally with your arguments, but I think generally conservatives are. And I think
00:34:04.480
maybe you found yourself in an alliance with, with conservatives on this particular issue. Um,
00:34:10.880
would you say that that's fair? Yeah. I mean, I guess I don't consider it an alliance per se. I just
00:34:16.080
consider it like, of course, there's things that I, you know, a variety of people agree with me on
00:34:22.720
and that I agree with them on. And then we disagree on about other things. You know, this is why I
00:34:27.600
really have stopped finding these political labels and left versus right and conservative and left wing
00:34:34.320
or whatever, not very helpful at all, because I don't think it's applicable to most people. I think
00:34:39.760
most people don't identify as left wing or right wing. They're just regular people who believe
00:34:44.720
various things. Well, what I was wondering is if you have, I think you have a largely feminist base,
1.00
00:34:51.200
um, that follows your work. I mean, your, your podcast and website is called Feminist Current.
1.00
00:34:55.360
Um, so is your base giving you any flack, I suppose, for, um, engaging with, you know, the evil conservatives?
00:35:04.640
I mean, some people have, yeah. Some people have said, you know, like, it's not a good look or that
00:35:10.880
it like taints me somehow, or it taints the feminist movement because I talk to people,
0.99
00:35:16.080
you know, they don't like. And a lot of people that I'm criticized for talking to aren't even
00:35:21.280
right wing people. They're like liberals or libertarians or, you know, I don't even know what
00:35:25.840
they would describe themselves as. They're just people who aren't squarely on the left or
00:35:31.040
necessarily feminist or they don't agree with everything that feminists say or something like
1.00
00:35:36.160
that. Um, I mean, people need to employ a lot more nuance when engaging with people's ideas than they
00:35:42.000
do. But yeah, but I mean, at the same time, I have a lot of support and people, I mean, my role
00:35:50.800
as a writer and a journalist and a speaker is to talk to people. So I will talk to almost anyone,
00:35:57.360
you know, like I'm not doing, um, I'm not only doing, you know, political organizing. It's not
00:36:04.320
just about like, and I, you know, I really, I either way, I don't want to just talk to people
00:36:08.640
who agree with me. That's boring. I want to talk to people who are different than me, who have
00:36:12.480
different opinions than me. I want my ideas to be challenged so that my ideas are stronger and my
00:36:17.760
arguments are stronger. You know, like that's a useful way to ensure that you have good arguments,
00:36:21.600
is to challenge your own arguments and be challenged. Um, I, yeah, I don't, I don't like
00:36:28.480
that kind of cultishness where it's like, you can only talk to people or stand next to people or
00:36:35.120
engage with people who already agree with you. I don't think that's helpful. I don't think it's
00:36:38.880
particularly interesting. And I think it limits us in terms of our reach, you know, like I want these
00:36:46.080
ideas to be out there. That's why I'm doing this. I'm trying to explain to people why I'm troubled
00:36:51.760
by what's going on. And, um, I want as many people as possible to support me and to support those of
00:37:00.880
us who are, who are fighting this. I don't really care, you know, like if they, if they're, if they're
00:37:07.040
different than me, I mean, I'm still me regardless of who I talk to. Um, and if we happen to like each
00:37:13.040
other or agree with each, I mean, I like lots of people. Like I really, I enjoy talking to people.
00:37:17.840
It's not, you know, it's something that I like to do. It's a way that I like to learn about the
00:37:21.600
world and it's a way to build empathy towards other humans, which I think is really important
00:37:26.240
and really lacking today. So, and I just, I think more people would do that. So I feel like people who
00:37:31.920
are, you know, would criticize me for doing that should try to do it themselves. Then they might find
00:37:36.400
themselves surprised about how much they like people they think that they hate.
00:37:39.520
What do you mean to that? So what's next for you?
00:37:43.760
Uh, I'm headed to New Zealand on Monday to do, yeah, I'm stoked. Uh, I've never been there before
00:37:50.080
to do a couple of talks. Um, I don't know what's planned for 2020, but probably more talking,
00:37:59.760
more speaking about this. Um, trying to keep myself safe. I mean, things are getting a bit crazy. I,
00:38:05.760
I have been doing a lot of media lately. So that's, it's been stressful and pretty exhausting
00:38:11.600
for the past few months, the past year in general, but particularly the past few months. I mean,
00:38:16.960
all the protests and attacks are hard to deal with. Uh, I'm going to keep at it. And, uh, I think
00:38:24.240
the tides are turning. So I'm at least glad that we're having this conversation finally in Canada,
00:38:28.640
that it's happening and people are pushing back and people are talking about it and people are showing up.
00:38:33.440
I feel like it is getting a little easier to talk about it. Yeah. Yeah. So, uh, we can't find you
00:38:39.360
on Twitter, at least not yet. Um, but you have a YouTube channel. It's just under Megan Murphy,
00:38:43.360
right? Right. Yeah. Anywhere else we can find you? I have a Facebook page. I have a public Instagram
00:38:48.560
page. Unfortunately, I didn't used to have a public Facebook or Instagram page before I got banned from
00:38:53.600
Twitter because I don't want to spend all my time on social media, but you know, I do. And that's a
00:39:00.080
place where you can find me and find my work and engage with me and, and there. And of course,
00:39:05.280
your website, Feminist Current. And you can find us at tnc.news on YouTube, on Facebook,
00:39:10.560
and Twitter. Thanks so much guys. And thanks Megan for joining me. Thanks.