ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- November 13, 2021
Trudeau doubles down on tackling "online hate speech"
Episode Stats
Length
3 minutes
Words per Minute
195.38226
Word Count
598
Sentence Count
35
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
00:00:00.000
Justin Trudeau talking about getting tough on hate speech, getting tough on misinformation,
00:00:11.180
yet again discussing the issue once again at an international gathering. Sounds nice
00:00:17.580
at first. Who likes hate speech? Who likes misinformation? No one. Sounds rosy. Why can't
00:00:22.840
we all agree with it? Hold on a second. No, the devil is in the details, as a lot of non-partisan
00:00:28.000
experts have been warning. This is not the first time Justin Trudeau has been going on about this.
00:00:33.020
This has become something of an obsession for the liberals, obsessing over the idea that everywhere
00:00:38.180
we look in the online sphere, there's these awful things going on, and we've got to do more. We've
00:00:43.960
got to bring in new laws and new initiatives and funding for this and that to do away with all of
00:00:49.580
this. Action must happen. Something must be done. Prior to the most recent election, you had Justice
00:00:55.460
Minister David Lamedi talking about this stuff. You had former Heritage Minister Stephen Guilbeau
00:01:00.440
talking about it, saying a lot of things that shocked a lot of people, saying that public servants
00:01:05.840
cannot be criticized, and we've got to put an end to all of that. What's going on there? And he was
00:01:10.400
putting forward legislation that you had a lot of non-partisan experts stepping forward and going,
00:01:15.440
this is internet censorship laws. We don't want this. And yet they were doing it all under the guise
00:01:20.380
of, oh, we've just got to clean up that mean stuff on that internet that nobody really supports,
00:01:24.360
of course, so we've got to do away with it. You know, there's an old joke out there. What's hate
00:01:28.820
speech? Well, that's speech I hate. You know, if there's something that you dislike, there's something
00:01:33.820
that, well, you hate, you can say, well, that's hate speech, so, you know, let's do away with it.
00:01:37.800
Let's regulate it away. Uh-oh. That's a slippery slope. Now, you might say, Fury, what's the big deal?
00:01:44.020
Because there's going to be tightly defined legal parameters, technical parameters, defining
00:01:48.500
exactly what can and can't be written or said or what have you, so they'll figure it out. They'll
00:01:53.920
sort it all out. Well, we've actually been doing that in Canada over the decades, and there's been
00:01:58.040
very rigorous conversations about all of that, and there actually already are things that you cannot
00:02:03.380
actually say, or at least if you say them, be prepared to suffer the legal consequences. For
00:02:08.980
instance, you cannot make serious threats to people, and people are regularly charged for this sort of
00:02:15.080
stuff. They go through the legal system because they've made these threats. You can't libel someone.
00:02:19.260
You can't defame someone. If that has happened to you, you have legal recourse, and again, people have
00:02:24.700
faced legal repercussions for this, or if there's stuff online that is defaming them, there's orders
00:02:29.780
for it to be taken down, and so on. So, there's already a legal framework around this. What exactly
00:02:35.180
has so seized the liberals that they must obsess over this issue? People are saying mean things on the
00:02:40.840
internet that we don't like, and more must be done. Well, you've got to say what are the details,
00:02:46.760
because the devil can be in the details on these things, and as we saw with Stephen Guilbault's
00:02:50.940
legislation there, lots of concerns that it did not pass the smell test. So, there you go. The liberals
00:02:57.220
are at it again, and you've got to be very cautious, and you've got to say what exactly is in the fine print.
Link copied!