In this episode of Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show, host Andrew Lawton talks about the impact of the federal government's latest increase in gasoline prices, the impact it's having on the economy, and what it's going to do in the long-term.
00:00:00.000Welcome to Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show.
00:00:05.220This is the Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:13.500Hello everyone and welcome to you all.
00:00:16.520This is Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show, the Andrew Lawton Show on True North.
00:00:20.920Wednesday, July 20th, 2022, just after 1 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
00:00:28.140not Eastern daily time. This is what happens when I go earlier than I'm used to. I haven't had my
00:00:32.460third or fourth coffee of the day yet. We are doing a bit of an earlier show than usual for
00:00:37.960our live programs. And that's because I have to immediately when I'm done, like just rush out the
00:00:43.700door of my studio in cartoon character-like fashion, get in my car and take a toodle down
00:00:48.880the 401 for an interview that I'm doing that I will be able to share with you in the next couple
00:00:53.600of days. So it'll all be worth it then, but that's why we're doing things at a bit of a different
00:00:57.240time. But if you are not watching this live, if you're watching on a repeat or you're listening
00:01:03.040to the podcast, you're wondering why I've wasted three minutes of your time when the time of day
00:01:07.320doesn't actually matter to you. So we will move on from there. Roman Babber, the conservative
00:01:12.560leadership candidate, is going to be popping by in about 15 minutes time to talk about his new
00:01:16.920platform, which has just been unveiled this morning. We are also going to be speaking later
00:01:23.000on in the program very briefly about indigo books and this little controversy that emerged online
00:01:29.560of indigo deciding it was not going to carry my book the freedom convoy the inside story
00:01:36.040of three weeks that shook the world on shelf so i'll actually haven't responded to this yet so
00:01:40.600i'll give a bit of a response in a little bit's time but i i want to start off by talking about
00:01:46.200the big inflation story here and you'll have to excuse me i i'm just uh moving my other computer
00:01:51.160There we go. I was on the wrong tab, and I couldn't actually see anything that my producer was telling me, which this whole thing just all falls to you-know-what if I don't actually listen to the producer.
00:02:01.840But the inflation numbers this morning, not particularly surprising, but it's always good to be able to quantify these things.
00:02:08.740We have an 8.1% increase in inflation across the board.
00:02:13.980This is a 39-year high, so it's been nearly four decades since the cost of goods has shot
00:02:20.280up annually year over year, so month over month, year to year rather, as much as it
00:22:37.000Are you talking about some form of a sanction or are you suggesting that crime laws have actually been broken here?
00:22:42.940i'm not going to allege that marco mendocino broke the law what is clear is that he he did tell a
00:22:51.020parliamentary committee that there was advice given by law enforcement that um the government
00:22:57.780should invoke the war measures act uh sorry the emergencies act in order to deal with the
00:23:02.540protesters and clearly that um at least my understanding in the media did not uh turn out
00:23:08.680be true and in fact all three agencies ottawa the opp and the rcmp denied that uh at the very least
00:23:15.720we'd like to see what's called ministerial accountability whereby the prime minister
00:23:19.880would remove the minister or the minister would voluntarily resign it's just that regretfully
00:23:25.160decency has left parliament in our political system and beyond that when when it came to
00:23:30.280ministerial accountability then the last line of defense uh of um ministerial accountability would
00:23:37.320be the news media that would continue to hammer and hold the minister responsible but that is not
00:23:41.720happening regretfully so um i'm of the view that uh of course there should be ministerial
00:23:47.640accountability but if there isn't uh our opportunity to hold them accountable is on
00:23:52.600elections day something that the conservative party seemed to be unable to do because we just
00:23:56.600failed to unite in spite of ourselves i was mentioning just before you joined the program
00:24:01.960there was a tweet from the Conservative Party of Canada just the other day about effectively saying
00:24:07.620we don't want an election. I think we can even put it up on the screen there. It was,
00:24:11.060the Trudeau Liberals should be focused on helping Canadians. Canadians don't want a fall election.
00:24:16.080Now, when I saw that tweet, I mean, my view is that Canadians may not want a fall election,
00:24:20.540but it's incumbent upon the opposition to oppose. And I think it was very odd messaging, in fact,
00:24:26.260that, you know, on one hand to say the Liberals are doing such a terrible job, but on the other
00:24:29.520hand Canadians shouldn't have the opportunity to get rid of them what was
00:24:32.700your view on on that and in general the idea of you know going into a potential
00:24:37.140fall election if you were the conservative leader come September I
00:24:40.500quote tweeted that tweet and I said what no we can't afford another day of Justin
00:24:47.340Trudeau in office let's get this leadership done and go forward with the
00:24:51.480full election I'm ready Andrew and I think that our party I expect our party
00:24:58.020unite very very quickly after the leadership election we cannot afford another day of this
00:25:03.140government and and the democratic erosion that we're seeing economic opportunity being eroded
00:25:09.220of course we're potentially looking at a record 40 year high in inflation life in canada is
00:25:14.980becoming unaffordable i propose that we move as quickly as possible if justin trudeau wants to
00:25:21.380ask canadians for another mandate or to give us an opportunity to ask for a mandate bring it on
00:25:26.820as quickly as we can. That's my view. Your plan right now for the leadership, I'll take a step
00:25:33.000back here. One of the big frustrations we saw in 2020 is that Aaron O'Toole ran on this really
00:25:38.560red meat, true blue conservative leadership platform, which then was watered down considerably
00:25:44.500in 2021 when he sought the general election votes. A similar thing happened with Andrew Scheer in
00:25:50.0402017. We saw a lot of things in the leadership that didn't really translate to the election.
00:25:54.640I mean, the one thing, if we did have a fall election, you wouldn't really have time to do much backtracking.
00:26:00.040Not that that would be what you'd want to do anyway.
00:26:02.080But are you prepared to stand on every policy that you're putting forward in your platform here in the leadership race in a general election as well?
00:26:11.040A hundred percent. Andrew, I will not say anything to you that I will not repeat in the mainstream media, be it in the leadership or be it in the general election.
00:26:18.240That is precisely what I think harms us during every election.
00:26:23.840and after every leadership we have this tendency where the leader runs to the right during the
00:26:28.480leadership and then pivots to the center in which case the the conservative party faithful think
00:26:32.480that he misrepresented herself or himself and and the liberals are laughing at us for for being
00:26:37.600wafflers and flip-floppers no we cannot afford that to happen and and one area where i particularly
00:26:43.280look forward other than of course canada's democracy uh passports and mandates something
00:26:47.840that i'll make a thing of the past i'll amend the canada health act to make sure that we don't
00:26:52.240discriminate against anyone ever again because of their medical choice uh and and of course beyond
00:26:57.520my commitment to restore freedom of speech i am very very bullish on canada's natural resources
00:27:03.920and i would propose to make canada natural resources superpower and that means that we
00:27:08.800cannot be afraid to take our keys to canadians during the general election and say that we
00:27:13.440oppose the carbon tax i do not believe in all honesty the taxing sally 10 bucks at the pump
00:27:19.920is going to change the global climate i don't think that many people believe that i don't think
00:27:24.320that many european countries remain committed to the paris accord which of course misses the point
00:27:28.960because it doesn't touch the world's biggest polluters and so i think it's it's against
00:27:32.720canada's national interest and i'll pull this out of the paris accord i'm i think that um our
00:27:38.400natural resources are a blessing i'm not going to let oil and gas be cancelled we need to rethink
00:27:44.640and and legislate and negotiate the construction of all three major pipelines i think our our
00:27:49.200friends to the south might be ready for an excel keystone given how upset americans are at gas
00:27:54.560prices we need to clarify the duty to consult and rebalance some uh timelines we need to encourage
00:28:00.320refinery capacity mining we need to do it all uh that's the only way we're going to climb out of
00:28:04.800the fiscal hole uh that we're in and and i look forward to taking this case directly to canadians
00:28:10.480i think the tide on unnatural resources uh is is changing our way when you talk about the refining
00:28:17.600capacity this is not something we hear a lot of in canada in fact a lot of people just insist that
00:28:22.480we don't need to increase refining capacity which i i don't buy into but what would you do when you
00:28:27.280say encourage is it just saying as a potential prime minister yes we need to do this are you
00:28:31.920talking about uh you know tax credits to companies what does that actual process look like to you
00:28:37.680you've got to simplify the regulatory regime that's number one number two you need to create
00:28:43.920a culture whereby uh capital and investment is not worried about the regulatory uncertainty or
00:28:50.880the political uncertainty that would ensue in in something to that effect and and finally
00:28:57.440we have to we have to have a conversation about pipelines again and we have to hold
00:29:04.400those that propose to stand in for the environment accountable to their world to their word i i think
00:29:11.200if if anyone's passionate about the environment they should be against transporting uh natural
00:29:17.760resources by train at least those that don't need to be by train and instead use pipelines
00:29:23.760pipelines are a lot safer than trains right we saw the disaster in like magnetic a couple of uh
00:29:30.160about a decade ago so uh pedal to the metal on all of that andrew and that starts with a culture
00:29:35.600change with a certainty for investors and with regulatory reform. Another topic that doesn't
00:29:42.640typically rank high on the list of sexiness of political topics, but you have it in your platform
00:29:47.440under restoring Canadian opportunity, reducing barriers and encouraging competition in federally
00:29:53.800regulated industries. So my hope would be, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, you're talking about
00:29:58.440airlines, you're talking about telecommunications, you're talking about rail transport,1.00
00:30:03.880are you basically talking about everything there if there's anything we learned from the rogers
00:30:10.040outage a couple of weeks ago is is how terrible our federally regulated industries are canadians
00:30:16.920pay some of the highest prices for cell phones and internet access and and that shouldn't be the case
00:30:23.400and you know uh a couple years ago when mobile tried to come into canada and and compete and i
00:30:29.400i think they've been around for about five or seven years and and when they left the ceo said
00:30:34.040that canada is one of the worst places on earth to do business and and that is shameful and and
00:30:40.600that should not be the case so uh i propose that we stop protecting these antiquated institutions
00:30:47.400i've had it with air canada okay personally and nationally so so i i propose that we invite
00:30:56.200foreign carriers uh you know there's no reason why if if um let's say lufthansa uh lands in in
00:31:04.120toronto and then proceeds to vancouver why a canadian cannot hitch on a ride on lufthansa
00:31:09.400from toronto to vancouver that will be good for the consumer it'll be good for canadians same
00:31:14.600with telecom and and same with banking we have four and a half national banks and and sorry
00:31:20.680four and a half major banks and and i don't understand why why that needs to be the case
00:31:24.360competition is good for consumer it's good for canadians we need to do to free up all those
00:31:29.400industries and and encourage competition let people work because i know you did mention earlier
00:31:36.280on that you want to reform lobbying do you view all of these things as being a victim or a byproduct
00:31:42.760of lobbying you know all of these companies have good strong lobbyists and or do you think there's
00:31:47.160something else there because the government will typically defend these things by talking about
00:31:51.400really i'd say esoteric canadian qualities and the fact that oh no no we have to protect our
00:31:57.240canadian culture because apparently air canada and via rail are the canadian culture or something
00:32:02.040like that but like i'm just curious where you think this problem comes from because
00:32:06.280it should be a no-brainer i mean no canadian no canadian is happy with their choices for cell
00:32:12.120phone providers like zero especially any canadian that has a friend or a family in europe and that's
00:32:17.960getting you know twice the data for a third of the price so where is this coming from
00:32:23.400i think our our prudence our unwillingness to innovate uh the fact that um we we seem to
00:32:30.840somehow associate uh some of these institutions with a hint of national pride um but but certainly
00:32:37.800lobbying plays a part and look on on this issue um prime minister harper actually tried to reform
00:32:47.080uh some of the lobbying in this country and he made some some good strides and i would propose
00:32:51.400that we started he also by the way tried to let verizon come in which ended up just exploding
00:32:57.160canada yeah uh at the very least we see a very tight um relationship between interest stakeholders
00:33:06.920and government obviously it's it's conjointed by lobbyists and essentially uh all they do is they
00:33:13.560offer access um for for payment i and and my view is you can take a few concrete steps for instance
00:33:22.360you should not have a government public a public servant or a staffer leave it leave government
00:33:28.680after half a year or a year and join a lobbying firm and start lobbying their friends we we need
00:33:33.560to have some some arms link between insiders within government and then subsequently lobbyists that