00:00:00.000Welcome to Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show.
00:00:05.220This is the Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:13.500Hello everyone and welcome to you all.
00:00:16.520This is Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show, the Andrew Lawton Show on True North.
00:00:20.920Wednesday, July 20th, 2022, just after 1 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
00:00:28.140not Eastern daily time. This is what happens when I go earlier than I'm used to. I haven't had my
00:00:32.460third or fourth coffee of the day yet. We are doing a bit of an earlier show than usual for
00:00:37.960our live programs. And that's because I have to immediately when I'm done, like just rush out the
00:00:43.700door of my studio in cartoon character-like fashion, get in my car and take a toodle down
00:00:48.880the 401 for an interview that I'm doing that I will be able to share with you in the next couple
00:00:53.600of days. So it'll all be worth it then, but that's why we're doing things at a bit of a different
00:00:57.240time. But if you are not watching this live, if you're watching on a repeat or you're listening
00:01:03.040to the podcast, you're wondering why I've wasted three minutes of your time when the time of day
00:01:07.320doesn't actually matter to you. So we will move on from there. Roman Babber, the conservative
00:01:12.560leadership candidate, is going to be popping by in about 15 minutes time to talk about his new
00:01:16.920platform, which has just been unveiled this morning. We are also going to be speaking later
00:01:23.000on in the program very briefly about indigo books and this little controversy that emerged online
00:01:29.560of indigo deciding it was not going to carry my book the freedom convoy the inside story
00:01:36.040of three weeks that shook the world on shelf so i'll actually haven't responded to this yet so
00:01:40.600i'll give a bit of a response in a little bit's time but i i want to start off by talking about
00:01:46.200the big inflation story here and you'll have to excuse me i i'm just uh moving my other computer
00:01:51.160There we go. I was on the wrong tab, and I couldn't actually see anything that my producer was telling me, which this whole thing just all falls to you-know-what if I don't actually listen to the producer.
00:02:01.840But the inflation numbers this morning, not particularly surprising, but it's always good to be able to quantify these things.
00:02:08.740We have an 8.1% increase in inflation across the board.
00:02:13.980This is a 39-year high, so it's been nearly four decades since the cost of goods has shot
00:02:20.280up annually year over year, so month over month, year to year rather, as much as it
00:22:37.000Are you talking about some form of a sanction or are you suggesting that crime laws have actually been broken here?
00:22:42.940i'm not going to allege that marco mendocino broke the law what is clear is that he he did tell a
00:22:51.020parliamentary committee that there was advice given by law enforcement that um the government
00:22:57.780should invoke the war measures act uh sorry the emergencies act in order to deal with the
00:23:02.540protesters and clearly that um at least my understanding in the media did not uh turn out
00:23:08.680be true and in fact all three agencies ottawa the opp and the rcmp denied that uh at the very least
00:23:15.720we'd like to see what's called ministerial accountability whereby the prime minister
00:23:19.880would remove the minister or the minister would voluntarily resign it's just that regretfully
00:23:25.160decency has left parliament in our political system and beyond that when when it came to
00:23:30.280ministerial accountability then the last line of defense uh of um ministerial accountability would
00:23:37.320be the news media that would continue to hammer and hold the minister responsible but that is not
00:23:41.720happening regretfully so um i'm of the view that uh of course there should be ministerial
00:23:47.640accountability but if there isn't uh our opportunity to hold them accountable is on
00:23:52.600elections day something that the conservative party seemed to be unable to do because we just
00:23:56.600failed to unite in spite of ourselves i was mentioning just before you joined the program
00:24:01.960there was a tweet from the Conservative Party of Canada just the other day about effectively saying
00:24:07.620we don't want an election. I think we can even put it up on the screen there. It was,
00:24:11.060the Trudeau Liberals should be focused on helping Canadians. Canadians don't want a fall election.
00:24:16.080Now, when I saw that tweet, I mean, my view is that Canadians may not want a fall election,
00:24:20.540but it's incumbent upon the opposition to oppose. And I think it was very odd messaging, in fact,
00:24:26.260that, you know, on one hand to say the Liberals are doing such a terrible job, but on the other
00:24:29.520hand Canadians shouldn't have the opportunity to get rid of them what was
00:24:32.700your view on on that and in general the idea of you know going into a potential
00:24:37.140fall election if you were the conservative leader come September I
00:24:40.500quote tweeted that tweet and I said what no we can't afford another day of Justin
00:24:47.340Trudeau in office let's get this leadership done and go forward with the
00:24:51.480full election I'm ready Andrew and I think that our party I expect our party
00:24:58.020unite very very quickly after the leadership election we cannot afford another day of this
00:25:03.140government and and the democratic erosion that we're seeing economic opportunity being eroded
00:25:09.220of course we're potentially looking at a record 40 year high in inflation life in canada is
00:25:14.980becoming unaffordable i propose that we move as quickly as possible if justin trudeau wants to
00:25:21.380ask canadians for another mandate or to give us an opportunity to ask for a mandate bring it on
00:25:26.820as quickly as we can. That's my view. Your plan right now for the leadership, I'll take a step
00:25:33.000back here. One of the big frustrations we saw in 2020 is that Aaron O'Toole ran on this really
00:25:38.560red meat, true blue conservative leadership platform, which then was watered down considerably
00:25:44.500in 2021 when he sought the general election votes. A similar thing happened with Andrew Scheer in
00:25:50.0402017. We saw a lot of things in the leadership that didn't really translate to the election.
00:25:54.640I mean, the one thing, if we did have a fall election, you wouldn't really have time to do much backtracking.
00:26:00.040Not that that would be what you'd want to do anyway.
00:26:02.080But are you prepared to stand on every policy that you're putting forward in your platform here in the leadership race in a general election as well?
00:26:11.040A hundred percent. Andrew, I will not say anything to you that I will not repeat in the mainstream media, be it in the leadership or be it in the general election.
00:26:18.240That is precisely what I think harms us during every election.
00:26:23.840and after every leadership we have this tendency where the leader runs to the right during the
00:26:28.480leadership and then pivots to the center in which case the the conservative party faithful think
00:26:32.480that he misrepresented herself or himself and and the liberals are laughing at us for for being
00:26:37.600wafflers and flip-floppers no we cannot afford that to happen and and one area where i particularly
00:26:43.280look forward other than of course canada's democracy uh passports and mandates something
00:26:47.840that i'll make a thing of the past i'll amend the canada health act to make sure that we don't
00:26:52.240discriminate against anyone ever again because of their medical choice uh and and of course beyond
00:26:57.520my commitment to restore freedom of speech i am very very bullish on canada's natural resources
00:27:03.920and i would propose to make canada natural resources superpower and that means that we
00:27:08.800cannot be afraid to take our keys to canadians during the general election and say that we
00:27:13.440oppose the carbon tax i do not believe in all honesty the taxing sally 10 bucks at the pump
00:27:19.920is going to change the global climate i don't think that many people believe that i don't think
00:27:24.320that many european countries remain committed to the paris accord which of course misses the point
00:27:28.960because it doesn't touch the world's biggest polluters and so i think it's it's against
00:27:32.720canada's national interest and i'll pull this out of the paris accord i'm i think that um our
00:27:38.400natural resources are a blessing i'm not going to let oil and gas be cancelled we need to rethink
00:27:44.640and and legislate and negotiate the construction of all three major pipelines i think our our
00:27:49.200friends to the south might be ready for an excel keystone given how upset americans are at gas
00:27:54.560prices we need to clarify the duty to consult and rebalance some uh timelines we need to encourage
00:28:00.320refinery capacity mining we need to do it all uh that's the only way we're going to climb out of
00:28:04.800the fiscal hole uh that we're in and and i look forward to taking this case directly to canadians
00:28:10.480i think the tide on unnatural resources uh is is changing our way when you talk about the refining
00:28:17.600capacity this is not something we hear a lot of in canada in fact a lot of people just insist that
00:28:22.480we don't need to increase refining capacity which i i don't buy into but what would you do when you
00:28:27.280say encourage is it just saying as a potential prime minister yes we need to do this are you
00:28:31.920talking about uh you know tax credits to companies what does that actual process look like to you
00:28:37.680you've got to simplify the regulatory regime that's number one number two you need to create
00:28:43.920a culture whereby uh capital and investment is not worried about the regulatory uncertainty or
00:28:50.880the political uncertainty that would ensue in in something to that effect and and finally
00:28:57.440we have to we have to have a conversation about pipelines again and we have to hold
00:29:04.400those that propose to stand in for the environment accountable to their world to their word i i think
00:29:11.200if if anyone's passionate about the environment they should be against transporting uh natural
00:29:17.760resources by train at least those that don't need to be by train and instead use pipelines
00:29:23.760pipelines are a lot safer than trains right we saw the disaster in like magnetic a couple of uh
00:29:30.160about a decade ago so uh pedal to the metal on all of that andrew and that starts with a culture
00:29:35.600change with a certainty for investors and with regulatory reform. Another topic that doesn't
00:29:42.640typically rank high on the list of sexiness of political topics, but you have it in your platform
00:29:47.440under restoring Canadian opportunity, reducing barriers and encouraging competition in federally
00:29:53.800regulated industries. So my hope would be, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, you're talking about
00:29:58.440airlines, you're talking about telecommunications, you're talking about rail transport,1.00
00:30:03.880are you basically talking about everything there if there's anything we learned from the rogers
00:30:10.040outage a couple of weeks ago is is how terrible our federally regulated industries are canadians
00:30:16.920pay some of the highest prices for cell phones and internet access and and that shouldn't be the case
00:30:23.400and you know uh a couple years ago when mobile tried to come into canada and and compete and i
00:30:29.400i think they've been around for about five or seven years and and when they left the ceo said
00:30:34.040that canada is one of the worst places on earth to do business and and that is shameful and and
00:30:40.600that should not be the case so uh i propose that we stop protecting these antiquated institutions
00:30:47.400i've had it with air canada okay personally and nationally so so i i propose that we invite
00:30:56.200foreign carriers uh you know there's no reason why if if um let's say lufthansa uh lands in in
00:31:04.120toronto and then proceeds to vancouver why a canadian cannot hitch on a ride on lufthansa
00:31:09.400from toronto to vancouver that will be good for the consumer it'll be good for canadians same
00:31:14.600with telecom and and same with banking we have four and a half national banks and and sorry
00:31:20.680four and a half major banks and and i don't understand why why that needs to be the case
00:31:24.360competition is good for consumer it's good for canadians we need to do to free up all those
00:31:29.400industries and and encourage competition let people work because i know you did mention earlier
00:31:36.280on that you want to reform lobbying do you view all of these things as being a victim or a byproduct
00:31:42.760of lobbying you know all of these companies have good strong lobbyists and or do you think there's
00:31:47.160something else there because the government will typically defend these things by talking about
00:31:51.400really i'd say esoteric canadian qualities and the fact that oh no no we have to protect our
00:31:57.240canadian culture because apparently air canada and via rail are the canadian culture or something
00:32:02.040like that but like i'm just curious where you think this problem comes from because
00:32:06.280it should be a no-brainer i mean no canadian no canadian is happy with their choices for cell
00:32:12.120phone providers like zero especially any canadian that has a friend or a family in europe and that's
00:32:17.960getting you know twice the data for a third of the price so where is this coming from
00:32:23.400i think our our prudence our unwillingness to innovate uh the fact that um we we seem to
00:32:30.840somehow associate uh some of these institutions with a hint of national pride um but but certainly
00:32:37.800lobbying plays a part and look on on this issue um prime minister harper actually tried to reform
00:32:47.080uh some of the lobbying in this country and he made some some good strides and i would propose
00:32:51.400that we started he also by the way tried to let verizon come in which ended up just exploding
00:32:57.160canada yeah uh at the very least we see a very tight um relationship between interest stakeholders
00:33:06.920and government obviously it's it's conjointed by lobbyists and essentially uh all they do is they
00:33:13.560offer access um for for payment i and and my view is you can take a few concrete steps for instance
00:33:22.360you should not have a government public a public servant or a staffer leave it leave government
00:33:28.680after half a year or a year and join a lobbying firm and start lobbying their friends we we need
00:33:33.560to have some some arms link between insiders within government and then subsequently lobbyists that