Juno News - January 09, 2025


Trudeau is OUT...sort of


Episode Stats


Length

29 minutes

Words per minute

176.75117

Word count

5,299

Sentence count

3


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the North dispatch, we discuss the Prime Minister's decision to resign, the upcoming court challenge to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's prorogation of parliament, and the impact this will have on the upcoming case law challenge.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
00:00:00.000 welcome back everyone to another episode of the northern dispatch we're only two weeks into 2025
00:00:15.840 and this year has already been insane we're kind of at that stage now where we're looking at a year
00:00:22.880 that may be uh one of the most insane years in canadian history and i think it's safe to say
00:00:28.240 that and it's only been two weeks justin trudeau has announced his resignation or more accurately
00:00:34.320 his intention to resign within three or so months we're not exactly sure what that timeline is going
00:00:40.720 to look like we also have renewed threats from the incoming president we are about a week and a half
00:00:47.040 away from him taking back the white house and he is already saying that he's going to annex canada
00:00:53.280 through economic force so everything is just going swimmingly in this country and we've got
00:00:59.200 some comments to read out from our show i believe it's three weeks ago we had to take a pause last
00:01:05.360 week and uh we've got these comments here now we've got this one from henry sams 7174 i believe that no
00:01:14.320 news agency should be government funded and i think most canadians would agree with you there henry no
00:01:21.920 new no public funding for news agencies in this country so we have heather 1991 they aren't
00:01:29.600 journalists they're activists and this is this is i think what canadians are are feeling across many
00:01:37.680 of the mainstream media outlets because what they're seeing isn't unbiased it is extremely biased and
00:01:46.000 especially when you see some of these news agencies actively actively manipulating footage to make
00:01:52.320 certain political parties or certain political leaders look poorly how can you think anything but
00:01:59.840 and then we have jim spence 1741 saying news outlets should report the news not create it absolutely when
00:02:07.760 you are reporting the news when you are behind the camera you should be behind the camera the news should
00:02:14.560 be what's happening in front of you not you yourself well if the news agency ends up becoming
00:02:18.960 the story you know you're doing something wrong amen to that absolutely i think we have to rearrange the
00:02:25.920 way we do these poll questions to the audiences uh the audience guys because i think we're we're proposing
00:02:32.640 questions that are almost too obvious but because we've done it we're going to have to read out the results and
00:02:37.520 hopefully this next poll question might get us some more variety last episode's poll question was is just
00:02:44.160 trudeau intentionally manipulating the economy for political points yes 97.7 percent of course what
00:02:51.440 a surprise there who could have seen that one coming let's see if we can get some variety here in this
00:02:57.680 question the poll question which you can find in the pinned comment of this video is this will the
00:03:04.400 court uphold the pro regret prorogation in the upcoming court challenge of the pro regret prorogation i'm
00:03:12.000 having trouble with that word guys i i apologize but ryan why don't i just ask you that question
00:03:17.360 right now we know that there is now a court challenge to justin trudeau's prorogation what
00:03:22.320 do you think is going to happen well the um this this is the whole interesting answer to this question
00:03:29.440 is i don't know um and the reason why i don't know is because this is unprecedented this type of
00:03:36.080 challenge in canada and the um the lawyers that are actually bringing this this challenge are actually
00:03:44.960 relying on a case from the uk back in 2019 when boris johnson prorogued parliament or tried to
00:03:52.880 when the whole brexit deal was going on and the argument uh in that challenge was that there's a
00:03:59.600 crisis facing the country you are preventing parliamentarians from actually debating the the
00:04:05.760 issue addressing the issue and you're doing this for partisan reasons to to save your party not for
00:04:12.640 the actual you know betterment of the country or not following normal procedure practices so the the
00:04:20.000 judgment from the uk supreme court actually stated that the supreme court justices found that boris
00:04:27.840 johnson was frustrating members of parliament by actually proroguing and that's going to be probably
00:04:35.440 the one and only case law precedent that is going to be brought to bear here so there's going to be
00:04:40.640 some interesting discussion in terms of does this apply our court systems are in some cases very
00:04:47.120 different than the uk system our parliamentary system is very similar but not exact so um
00:04:55.760 the other question is is which judge is going to be sitting in front of this which judges our supreme
00:05:00.800 court is made up primarily of liberal appointed judges is that going to play a factor we
00:05:05.360 hope not but it's going to come down to i don't know we're just going to have to see how this plays
00:05:10.080 out and and see if the legal arguments are are upheld in the merit so the case really comes down to
00:05:18.240 you know whether or not one is allowed to close down parliament in a national crisis when the people
00:05:25.040 need a parliament when the people need a parliament to keep the government going i would argue tanya that
00:05:30.160 we're facing a national crisis right now we are looking at a situation in which our economy could
00:05:36.240 be entirely destroyed by a massive terror from the united states does it feel as though the prime
00:05:42.400 minister has simply abandoned his post at a time when the country actually needs a prime minister
00:05:47.920 no matter how popular or unpopular he is well i think there's multiple crises that are kind of
00:05:54.880 happening at the same time here the crisis you're speaking about is the crisis crisis of trump coming
00:06:02.480 into office and threatening these tariffs against canada i think absolutely we need a government in
00:06:09.040 power at the time that can handle that but during prorogation the ministers are still kind of there
00:06:15.120 they're in the background they're not really doing the full amount of work that they would because
00:06:18.640 we're not legislating right parliament uh the house of commons and the senate are both not sitting
00:06:24.880 but they they don't just abandon post like ottawa is not completely empty there are people there to
00:06:30.960 keep the lights on mainly the ministers now the other crisis that's happening right now is the crisis
00:06:36.560 within the liberal party itself and i think the question is is it fair for the prime minister to prorogue
00:06:45.520 parliament knowing that he's facing a confidence vote because on the 7th which was the day after the
00:06:53.440 prime minister prorogued parliament the conservatives and the other opposition parties were going to work
00:06:58.880 on a motion to bring it to the house to request a non-confidence vote so that would have toppled
00:07:04.960 the government is trudeau avoiding a non-confidence vote and is he using prorogation to the party's
00:07:14.640 benefit in order to take some time off essentially and have a liberal leadership race while the
00:07:23.440 opposition parties cannot vote non-confidence because parliament is prorogued so are they
00:07:28.160 essentially choosing the next leader without the ability for the opposition to take the house down
00:07:34.960 well and the other thing that i'll jump in there on the 25 tariffs harrison is that
00:07:39.920 it's a multi-faceted issue because if there wasn't let's say the election wasn't going to be held for
00:07:45.680 two more years and this was a majority government and trudeau prorogue parliament it wouldn't be as
00:07:50.560 bad because you at least would have donald trump negotiating with the government that he knew
00:07:57.040 was the was the government of canada wasn't going anywhere and at least from a stability point of
00:08:03.520 view it's a position of strength the issue here is that everyone can see that this government can
00:08:09.680 fall at any time if there is an opportunity for a confidence vote and donald trump and his
00:08:16.000 administration will know that anyone he's talking to in government right now doesn't really have the
00:08:21.440 authority to speak for the government because it's going to die within a few months anyway so
00:08:26.480 this whole thing um prorogation is an issue in that you're delaying the election to actually put
00:08:34.320 in a new government with a strong mandate that would be able to i would say have meaningful
00:08:40.320 negotiations negotiations with donald trump and it would actually probably make a lot of this
00:08:46.640 behavior that donald trump is is exhibiting right now here disappear because he's taking advantage of
00:08:51.360 weakness he sees what's going on and he's trying to exploit it we're going to get into that later
00:08:56.320 on in the show because it's it's significant it requires attention but on this crisis unfolding in
00:09:03.040 the liberal party right now we talk about how yes the cabinet ministers are still going to be around and
00:09:08.400 still going to be able to look over their files but also several of them are trying to become the next
00:09:13.680 prime minister they're trying to win the next liberal leadership race with all these different
00:09:18.720 questions about who can vote in the liberal leadership race what that's going to look like
00:09:23.440 what are you guys seeing in terms of of who is going to be that next leader the next prime minister of
00:09:29.200 our country i honestly don't think there's any obvious front runner like when pierre had his leadership
00:09:36.720 race uh back in 2022 i remember seeing the video on on facebook and going that's the man that's
00:09:43.840 going to be our next prime minister he's going to lead the opposition and then he's going to become
00:09:48.240 prime minister like it was very obvious to me and it was also very obvious to the voters in the
00:09:53.600 leadership convention he won with like i think something like 70 of the vote it was a huge share
00:09:58.880 he won in the first round now with the liberal leaders all these folks that are starting to come
00:10:03.600 forward they're coming out of the woodwork i really don't see a strong contender for leader
00:10:09.360 well and the the other thing too is anyone that is a current sitting mp
00:10:16.560 is if they become liberal leader they're going to get trounced in the election because the automatic
00:10:21.920 argument coming from every opposition party is you were here you voted for all these policies
00:10:27.040 you're just as bad as justin trudeau case closed now the other issue is that anyone that is coming
00:10:33.840 in from the outside they have a better chance of actually running in the the election we just saw
00:10:38.720 i believe is frank bayless who just announced his uh well as much as you can announce um he is uh
00:10:46.640 intending on running for leader of the liberal party mark carney is considering it and uh christy
00:10:52.560 clark has said that she's interested so those are the current current outsiders that we are aware the
00:10:59.440 issue is that trudeau has turned this liberal brand into trudeauism almost um he's redefined what it
00:11:06.800 means to be a liberal and it's attached to all of these far left policies that have destroyed the
00:11:12.080 country so when you're coming in and we saw this with bayless on ctv when they ask him are you going
00:11:18.080 to get rid of the carbon tax he has to say no because that has become an identity of the liberal party
00:11:26.000 so he didn't really say no but he didn't say yes he's going to get rid of it well but we have to
00:11:31.920 remember bayless isn't a complete outsider he hasn't been in politics for a number of years but
00:11:37.360 he was in the liberal caucus from 2015 to 2019 so he like he helped lay the groundwork for trudeau's
00:11:45.600 government he does anybody does anybody really know who that guy is i mean when it comes to name
00:11:51.520 recognition i saw and i'm like okay uh who's that obviously it doesn't matter because he won't win in
00:11:57.200 a field with you know a freeland and a mark carney that's the thing right it's a talk about a long
00:12:02.640 shot candidacy uh but yeah yeah it's it's interesting because of course you would think
00:12:07.760 that anybody with some sort of some level of political instinct would realize the carbon tax
00:12:14.160 is an absolute no-go right if you start embracing the carbon tax you're just you're you're gonna you're
00:12:20.480 gonna you're gonna lose no matter what yeah that's the slippery slope to to look they agree with the
00:12:25.680 carbon tax they're gonna agree with every other policy yeah and and why why anyone who is an
00:12:32.240 outsider technically would actually still defend that policy is is astonishing it shows they have
00:12:38.800 basically zero political instinct and zero hope i think of of becoming the next leader of the
00:12:44.240 liberal party and i just can't for the life of me understand why someone of the caliber of mark carney
00:12:51.520 would want to become the the temporary prime minister uh yeah maybe maybe it's due to a
00:12:57.520 a very a very you know serious amount of uh patriotism and love of the country and feels like
00:13:03.040 oh i can i can help out for the next two months uh by being the prime minister but honestly are any
00:13:09.760 are any of the politicians really like that uh we don't get a sense that these are um if i were to pick
00:13:16.400 one that would be the quote unquote front runner so you know the least rotten of the rotten fruit
00:13:23.040 it would probably be christopher friedland riding on the coattails of her girl power
00:13:28.720 you know exit but i i don't think that's going to go very far this is probably going to be a
00:13:33.760 many many round uh uh selection of a uh of a liberal party leader you have mark carney
00:13:41.520 he's he's problematic if he is smart if he's as smart as everybody says he is he needs to wait
00:13:48.000 until after the election and then start a leadership bid to to wrestle this party from the ashes um
00:13:54.720 yeah because if he goes now he's just he's going down with the sinking ship like the liberals have not
00:13:59.200 hit rock bottom yet they are on their way but they haven't done it yet and if mark carney tries
00:14:04.640 to come in and take over the party as leader um unfortunately he's going to do very very poorly
00:14:10.800 in the next election yeah so um i i don't know why he wouldn't wait well and dominic leblanc also
00:14:18.000 announced today that he's not going to be running for the leader of the liberal party which um if he
00:14:23.280 was i would have put him as probably absolutely the most sensible one yeah absolutely i was going to
00:14:28.800 say to me he was the person that i think would have been the best suited to uh to see through
00:14:34.720 the rest of the mandate and to uh to put up some some kind of challenge uh at an election but again
00:14:43.360 we have to think about the situation the country is in right now the fact is regardless of who the
00:14:48.800 liberal party selects that prime minister without any mandate without any really without any confidence
00:14:54.880 of the parliament will still have to lead this country for a few months and still have to represent
00:15:01.200 this country at a time in which uh our country is entering a very strange period in our history i i
00:15:06.640 believe there are significant issues and if you aren't the helm even if it is for four months you have
00:15:11.520 to be competent you have to be serious so maybe there is an argument to say someone like mark carney he comes
00:15:17.760 in right he takes over the party knowing that they're going to uh knowing that they're going to lose
00:15:23.760 but they say okay you're going to take over but you're going to hold on at least until the next
00:15:28.960 federal election we're going to give you a next kick at the can as sort of the the top caliber candidate
00:15:34.800 um i just don't see anyone else who has the name recognition has the background and has the ability
00:15:41.920 to uh to to be a serious candidate other than mark carney well and the other thing to consider is
00:15:48.400 they're not even going to have a couple months right so how this will play out is since justin
00:15:54.240 trudeau is the interim prime minister until a new leader is chosen what's going to happen is let's
00:16:01.040 say the liberal party somehow gets a a leadership raise done and over with by march 24th when pro
00:16:07.200 propagation is set to end okay fine so they get that let's say in the you know second week of march
00:16:13.600 all right new prime minister great the prorogation ends on march 24th a throne speech is going to be
00:16:20.800 given and then the government will fall immediately thereafter in the confidence vote so um so they're
00:16:26.400 going to be basically prime minister for formally for about a week or two and then they're going to
00:16:33.120 go to an election now they're technically prime minister through the election because you know the
00:16:37.200 the government still has to to function but that's going to be it um and so until then we're going to
00:16:44.400 be saddled with justin trudeau and his weak cabinet to deal with this um how much damage is going to be
00:16:52.000 done as a result of that we will have to see but um it's if they had more time and again if if justin
00:16:59.360 trudeau had worked with the liberal party to figure this out um ahead of time you would have been correct
00:17:05.840 the new prime minister would have had maybe three or four months to kind of get their feet wet get
00:17:11.200 some control over parliament at least give canadians a demonstration of what they might have been in uh
00:17:18.160 in power after the next election and maybe they would have had a better shot but justin trudeau has
00:17:23.840 completely sabotaged the liberal party going into the next election and probably for the next 48 years
00:17:30.240 now let's look ahead just to what these challenges are going to be that are going to face
00:17:36.320 pierre pauliev when he becomes prime minister which is looking very likely and what these what the these
00:17:41.920 next few months are going to look like for canada if we were assuming that the threat of a 25 tariff on
00:17:49.200 all canadian uh products entering the united states was a bluff or a negotiating tactic i think that the
00:17:55.040 the the the press conference we heard from donald trump earlier this week in which he said that he
00:18:01.760 would use economic force to annex canada i'm pretty sure that tariff is coming into place uh and i'm
00:18:08.480 pretty sure it's going to have devastating effects what exactly do you think that's going to look like
00:18:14.560 and how that's going to play out over the next few months are we is i don't even know if we've actually
00:18:19.920 lived through something like this but i would imagine immediate pain and also some long-term pain
00:18:26.080 as well yeah that's if he goes through with it um i i go back to this so if you assume that donald
00:18:34.160 trump is a competent businessman which he is not completely incompetent because otherwise he would
00:18:39.280 have lost all of the billions of dollars that he's earned so he's he's at least competent and if
00:18:44.240 he's a competent businessman then he knows that a 25 tariff yes would be disastrous for the canadian
00:18:50.640 economy but it would also be disastrous for a lot of americans as well especially all of the american
00:18:56.560 organizations that use our oil and gas and any of the other imports that we take steel and and
00:19:02.000 everything that comes out of canada so it's going to hurt them as well so sure if if he's going to put
00:19:08.800 in a 25 tariff i imagine that's going to be very very time limited otherwise the entire country is
00:19:17.520 going to turn against him very very quickly and congress and the senate are going to turn against
00:19:23.440 them very very quickly because the republicans will become deeply unpopular at a rapid rate so
00:19:29.280 that's that's one thing that i would put forward um the other thing that i would say is
00:19:33.520 when you're playing poker or any type of uh game where you are playing psychological games over your
00:19:40.800 opponent uh and donald trump loves to play these games if you're bluffing and you notice that your
00:19:46.880 opponent might might believe you you usually double down to try to exert even more pressure and that's
00:19:53.440 what i see donald trump doing um if he were to try to do anything um in terms of annexing canada through
00:20:01.280 economic um forces or anything like that he's gonna need the help of congress he's gonna need
00:20:07.360 the help of the senate and i don't believe for a second that they would actually back him in that so
00:20:13.600 i think this is a lot of posturing from donald trump but the problem is is he's the next president
00:20:19.120 coming in and you have to at least pay attention to what he's saying and how do you think tanya pierre
00:20:27.600 pauliev at this point should be reacting we we've seen a we've seen a strong tweet that he posted
00:20:34.400 yesterday as every political leader did in this country um we've seen him say that there is that
00:20:41.840 that canada will never become the 51st state donald trump responded to that saying i don't care what
00:20:46.720 the leader of the conservative party has to say um and he doesn't he obviously doesn't show him any
00:20:51.760 respect so how do you think pierre pauliev as a as a prime minister in waiting should be reacting to
00:20:58.240 what we're now seeing which regardless as you know it could be a bluff but i at the same time i think
00:21:04.320 there needs to be a response um and it is unprecedented for canada so what do you think he should be doing
00:21:09.840 i think he handled it well actually um he he answered that you know he was for canada in support of
00:21:18.240 canada and he left donald trump's name completely out of that tweet if you notice so he's not giving
00:21:24.080 trump the attention but he's bolstering canada he's standing behind canadians and honestly i think that's
00:21:32.400 what you do when somebody is is kind of bearing down on you like this you don't give them the attention
00:21:38.960 you don't make it about them you make it about supporting your country your countrymen your economy
00:21:45.520 when you contrast that to justin trudeau's response right there's not a snowball's chance in hell that
00:21:50.160 we're going to be so that's immature well what that if you contrast those two two responses right there
00:21:57.920 one is from someone that sounds like they're literally screaming through their through their
00:22:03.440 keyboard they're screaming through their their phone and one is very measured and it's a perfect way
00:22:10.240 to deal with somebody like this and pierre knows how to deal with with people like donald trump
00:22:14.560 because pierre knows how to be like donald trump when he needs to be when he is the antagonist that's
00:22:21.360 not going to be his role going forward his role is to provide calm stability and leadership to canadians
00:22:27.360 so i agree the fact that he didn't even mention donald trump's name he just said yeah that's not
00:22:30.720 going to happen this is what i'm going to do you don't give it air and you don't give it oxygen
00:22:37.040 and any response and if i were pierre i wouldn't respond to trump's response i would just focus on moving
00:22:43.200 forward and and do what i do because if you don't respond to it it's not going to come back
00:22:48.960 what do you guys make of the announcement that he made before saying that he would use economic force
00:22:55.840 to absorb and annex canada he said that he would be willing to uh he wouldn't rule out using military
00:23:03.120 force to annex greenland now on a pure foreign policy basis um if that were to happen i in my in my
00:23:12.080 opinion there would need to be again another serious decision as to how canada approaches this
00:23:19.200 and how a canadian government would handle something like that regardless of if it's military or not
00:23:25.440 in previous in previous eras the canadian government would be very forceful in their in their reaction
00:23:32.080 to something like that are we in a place where we just have no recourse whatsoever and we're just
00:23:36.880 along for the ride and we're gonna just watch what happens well again this is where we we love relying
00:23:44.720 on our knowledge of procedure um so donald trump can say that he's going to use military force to
00:23:51.040 annex greenland he can't without congress congressional approval he actually has to get approval from
00:23:57.440 congress in order to do that so now if congress says sure we'll back you donald trump no problem okay
00:24:04.000 now it's a different conversation and if the us really wanted to march up here is there anything
00:24:10.720 we can do no absolutely not there's nothing we could do from from a military standpoint but the the
00:24:16.880 difference is is if if the united states wants to essentially rebrand themselves as another you know
00:24:25.280 totalitarian and and you know dictatorship state a you know they want to rebrand themselves as
00:24:33.600 essentially the new germany of 1939 have at her if that wants to be your legacy that's you know
00:24:40.480 that's that's totally up to you but there's no way that a the american people would let that happen
00:24:46.320 and there's no way that congress would let that happen so this is as far as i'm concerned it's it's
00:24:52.320 bluster and unfortunately i think it's going to be damaging the reputation in the united states
00:24:56.720 i i would agree and i think it already has in fact you've already seen reports and posts from european
00:25:04.800 world leaders saying that these comments at that press conference are very strange bizarre and we
00:25:11.760 we're not very happy to hear this sort of thing tanya do you think justin true you think all of this is
00:25:18.000 actually about justin trudeau feeling as though he needs to he needs to help continue negotiating on
00:25:24.720 behalf of canada with donald trump as he comes into office like how much how much of this you
00:25:29.440 think is about that and if and if there wasn't any threat do you think he would have just bowed out and
00:25:33.920 called an election um if i had to guess i would say that trump probably doesn't like trudeau very much
00:25:40.560 especially from all the things that he and his ministers have been saying over the past four years
00:25:46.560 they thought donald trump was gone for good they thought he was out of office they thought those
00:25:50.240 criminal charges would stick and that he'd never be president again and well they were wrong so now
00:25:56.640 that trudeau is weak that the liberal government is weak i think trump is taking every opportunity to
00:26:03.680 kind of stick it to them he's trash talking them he's intimidating them he's making them look like
00:26:08.880 fools on the world stage i think that's exactly what this is yeah i think it's almost personal between
00:26:13.600 donald trump and i think he's reveling every minute of this and he sees the over the top reaction
00:26:20.160 in justin trudeau's tweet and i think donald trump is sitting back in his chair and he's just smiling
00:26:24.800 and laughing at him but do you think that trudeau genuinely believes that he is the man that can best
00:26:32.000 handle trump and that if again if there was no if there was no issue trudeau would just back off because
00:26:37.680 i get the impression that a lot of what we're seeing now is actually because of the post that
00:26:43.840 donald trump has made the decisions that he has made right freeland cited that as the reason for her
00:26:49.040 resignation and it was that resignation which mounted the the liberal caucus revolt 2.0 that took trudeau
00:26:55.040 down um but he could he could have just left right he could have just left and kept parliament intact but
00:27:01.040 he didn't do that um so why do you think why do you think that is is that because he wants to be able to
00:27:07.120 deal with trump as trump enters office for the next what could be two three probably at least
00:27:12.720 a month and a half two months um i don't even know if it had anything to do with trump i think
00:27:17.600 that if trudeau had stepped down and there was no liberal leader and parliament was not prorogued
00:27:23.680 as in we went back to session on january 27th the leaders of the opposition parties would have voted
00:27:30.160 non-confidence they would have gotten their parties to vote non-confidence and we'd be going to an
00:27:33.440 election even sooner with the liberal party in an extremely weakened state i think a lot of this is
00:27:40.400 trump um sorry trudeau trying to protect the liberal party um trying to protect them from this catastrophic
00:27:47.440 loss that he had a huge hand in in creating well but to your point harrison um on the main question
00:27:56.000 yeah i think i think justin trudeau think he's he is still the messiah i think he thinks that
00:28:00.640 um he is the only person to be able to deal with trump i think the fact that it's obvious that he's
00:28:07.520 taken some of these tweets from donald trump personally that he's been publicly embarrassed
00:28:12.560 both by donald trump and on saturday night live um is that he feels that you know he's the fighter and
00:28:19.280 he needs to to stand up to the bully you know et cetera et cetera et cetera um and i think it's driving
00:28:24.720 him nuts that he's he's losing this battle and he's not going to be having that um it's it's an
00:28:31.040 interesting question because if we didn't have the tariffs would freeland have resigned at that point
00:28:35.360 that that's an interesting question so um and i and i don't think we'll ever get the answer to that but
00:28:42.320 um i think i i think you're right i think he probably does have this again this narcissist need to to say
00:28:50.000 nobody else can deal with us only i can and nobody understands that i'm the only one that can deal
00:28:54.640 with this and it's no longer just saturday saturday night live going after him cbc's 22 minutes is
00:29:01.680 going after him quite uh relentlessly and i have to say i sometimes they're a bit corny right uh but
00:29:08.400 some of them have some of the recent uh bits that 22 minutes have done on justin trudeau have made me
00:29:13.360 laugh genuinely i i never thought i would laugh at cbc comedy but like so many things in this country here we
00:29:19.280 are and i guess things are changing we're gonna have to leave it there but i want to remind the
00:29:25.200 viewers about this new poll question linked in the top comment of the video the poll question is this
00:29:31.520 will the court uphold prorogation in the upcoming court challenge let us know your answer to that poll
00:29:37.600 question also get involved in the comments section we may read your comment on the next episode of the
00:29:42.880 northern dispatch but until next week it's all we have time for we'll leave it there thank you all for
00:29:47.920 for watching