ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- November 20, 2024
Trudeau “jeopardizing” Canada’s relationship with the U.S.
Episode Stats
Length
16 minutes
Words per Minute
186.10912
Word Count
3,019
Sentence Count
157
Misogynist Sentences
6
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
00:00:00.000
Is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau jeopardizing Canada's relationship with the United States?
00:00:06.100
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith certainly seems to think so.
00:00:10.040
That's because, as Donald Trump has signaled the need for energy security in the U.S.
00:00:14.820
and plans to do that with his incoming administration,
00:00:19.180
Justin Trudeau is focused on emissions cap.
00:00:22.680
Emissions cap that, according to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith,
00:00:25.480
would make it harder for Alberta to get their product to markets like the U.S.
00:00:31.240
Now, the Alberta Premier has signaled that she's going to forge ahead with her own relationship with the United States,
00:00:38.220
leaving Ottawa aside.
00:00:40.340
And so, I didn't think it was possible, but with that,
00:00:43.480
Justin Trudeau's image on the world stage has diminished even further.
00:00:48.060
I'm Rachel Parker, and you're watching Rachel in the Republic.
00:00:55.480
Hey everyone, welcome back to Rachel in the Republic.
00:01:05.800
I'm your host, Rachel Parker.
00:01:07.440
As you guys know, I have covered Alberta politics for a very long time,
00:01:11.660
and when I left my old show, The Alberta Roundup,
00:01:15.440
I promised you guys that you would not be missing me,
00:01:18.760
but that you would actually be benefiting from even more Alberta coverage,
00:01:22.300
because the new host, Isaac Lamoureux, is obviously continuing that show and doing an excellent job of that.
00:01:28.220
But I told you that I would still occasionally dive into an Alberta story on my other shows from time to time.
00:01:35.940
And so, we are going to be talking about the Canadian-U.S. trade relationship today,
00:01:40.340
but taking a specific look at Alberta's role in this,
00:01:43.240
because Alberta Premier Daniel Smith has been making some very interesting comments in the days
00:01:48.220
since Donald Trump was elected to be the next President of the United States.
00:01:52.960
As you all know, the trading relationship between Canada and the United States is very important.
00:01:57.700
Those involved would often say it's one of the greatest examples of a trading relationship in the world.
00:02:03.320
And now, people in Canada, politicians in Canada,
00:02:06.140
are wondering how they're going to respond to Donald Trump's threats
00:02:09.540
of imposing a 10% tariff on products coming into the United States.
00:02:14.360
It's Alberta has quite the advantage here.
00:02:17.320
I don't think this is technically what is meant by the Alberta advantage,
00:02:20.040
but we have the advantage that the rest of the world wants our oil exports.
00:02:25.060
And the United States receives a host of Alberta exports,
00:02:28.260
and so Daniel Smith is hoping to use America's need for our oil
00:02:32.700
to essentially negotiate an agreement in which Alberta is not subject,
00:02:36.660
and our energy exports are not subject to that 10% tariff.
00:02:40.620
She's been asked about this repeatedly.
00:02:42.180
And while she's asked about this,
00:02:44.520
she's also asked if she plans on using Alberta's exports
00:02:48.200
to kind of give all of Canada a greater negotiating position.
00:02:53.580
If, for example, if America still wants the valuable Alberta energy exports,
00:02:59.020
maybe Donald Trump has to soften his position on tariffs across the board
00:03:02.720
for other industries in other parts of the country.
00:03:05.540
And the Alberta Premier has made it very clear that Ottawa,
00:03:10.980
and certainly Justin Trudeau, is not interested in a Team Canada approach
00:03:16.400
because Justin Trudeau continues to forge ahead with his emissions cap.
00:03:21.520
This is something you've probably heard the Premier talk about before.
00:03:24.780
We'll just touch a little bit about what that emissions cap would do.
00:03:28.200
We're still waiting for the exact specifics of the numbers for the cap,
00:03:31.180
but essentially the Trudeau Liberals have proposed beginning it in 2030
00:03:35.260
with the goal of reducing emissions by 40% to 45% from 2005 levels by 2030.
00:03:43.980
Now, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is not exactly opposed to reducing carbon footprints,
00:03:49.620
unlike some Conservative politicians or even some Conservatives of the province,
00:03:53.180
you know, don't want her to talk about carbon neutrality.
00:03:55.440
She thinks that it is possible,
00:03:56.960
but she has long expressed that we need a larger timeline.
00:04:00.580
She's often talked about 2050 as being a place where companies would then have the technology
00:04:05.320
that they would be able to reduce their carbon footprint.
00:04:07.660
And she says that 2030, 2035, that's too soon,
00:04:10.900
and that the industry simply cannot meet that target.
00:04:14.700
And she says that so long as Justin Trudeau is continuing to move ahead with his plans for emissions cap,
00:04:20.680
it is not possible for Alberta to have a Team Canada approach
00:04:23.700
in which she would use Alberta energy to advocate for the rest of Canada
00:04:27.800
and for advocating to help Ottawa as they negotiate with Donald Trump and with his administration.
00:04:33.800
Here's Alberta Premier Danielle Smith explaining her position to Vashi Capello of CTV News.
00:04:39.100
Take a listen.
00:04:40.320
I'm not bending on some of the direction they've taken.
00:04:43.440
It will jeopardize our relationship with the United States,
00:04:46.240
which is the largest trading relationship that we have,
00:04:49.360
not only Alberta, but all of our provincial counterparts.
00:04:51.480
We know one of the things that the new White House wants is energy security.
00:04:56.020
We have the ability to offer that.
00:04:58.020
And if you put on the table an emissions cap,
00:05:00.020
which we know will cause a cap in production,
00:05:03.080
you're not going to be able to negotiate in a way that's going to be best for Canada.
00:05:07.260
So if they want to have a Team Canada approach,
00:05:10.080
it means the emissions cap has to be off the table.
00:05:12.740
So Daniel Smith has certainly corrected her assessment
00:05:15.220
that the Donald Trump administration is interested in energy security in the U.S.
00:05:19.640
They want to be drilling more.
00:05:21.580
They want to be supplying more of their own energy,
00:05:23.520
as opposed to sourcing it from other countries,
00:05:25.740
including unethical oils that they receive from places like Iran and Saudi Arabia.
00:05:31.500
And so the Trump administration has signaled that they are interested,
00:05:35.540
that that's the direction they're going to be taking.
00:05:37.460
And Donald Trump made this stance very clear when he announced that he would be appointing
00:05:41.920
an oil executive, Chris Wright, to lead the energy department in the U.S.
00:05:47.120
Now, if you're wondering a little bit about who Chris Wright is,
00:05:49.220
it really signals how seriously Trump is taking this need for energy security in the U.S.
00:05:54.340
and how the climate crisis is definitely not a top priority for the Trump administration.
00:05:59.040
Chris Wright is actually somebody who said that there is no climate crisis.
00:06:02.700
He's been a very vocal critic of the efforts to fight climate change.
00:06:06.820
And he's a long-standing critic of these efforts.
00:06:10.740
So with that decision, as with so many of the other decisions that the Trump administration has made,
00:06:16.940
he's signaling the direction that the U.S. is planning to go in.
00:06:21.260
Now, in terms of Canada and its relationship with the United States,
00:06:25.420
Danielle Smith is going to be, you know, working her best to secure her own deal with the United States
00:06:30.780
to ensure that Alberta and its energy exports, as I said, are not subject to these tariffs.
00:06:35.300
Danielle Smith has even said she'll be going down to the inauguration in the U.S.,
00:06:40.140
to President Trump's inauguration.
00:06:42.260
She announced that this week.
00:06:44.020
And that she's working on building her own relationships.
00:06:47.260
She expressed this further in an interview with CBC.
00:06:49.960
Take a listen.
00:06:51.440
Coach first on this to ensure that your energy products aren't tariffed,
00:06:54.140
or does the access to your energy become part of the Team Canada conversation
00:06:58.120
about ensuring all sectors of the economy are not subject to any kind of new tariffs?
00:07:02.680
I would love a Team Canada approach, but look, we're not going to allow for an emissions cap
00:07:09.460
to have any role in reducing our production.
00:07:12.560
And so if the federal government is insistent upon going down that pathway,
00:07:16.160
then we'll take care of our own interests.
00:07:18.020
I would like our interests to align with the federal government.
00:07:20.080
I've told them so.
00:07:21.120
I've told them that dropping the emissions cap is part and parcel of being able to do that.
00:07:26.100
They have been unresponsive so far, but I think they need to recalibrate the relationship with the United States.
00:07:30.660
We know what the United States wants.
00:07:32.280
They want the federal government to mean its 2% NATO commitment,
00:07:35.380
and they want to be able to participate with us in energy security.
00:07:38.340
If those are the two things that we have to bring to the table,
00:07:40.600
then you don't come to the table with an emissions cap.
00:07:42.720
So that's part of the reason why we are going to be as collaborative as we can
00:07:47.880
with the federal government's approach.
00:07:49.940
But we absolutely will defend our own interests and make our own relationships if we have to.
00:07:54.280
So what you can hear there is you can hear the premier.
00:07:58.480
She's being, you know, very democratic about what she's saying.
00:08:01.200
She's saying, yeah, I would like to have a Team Canada approach with Ottawa.
00:08:04.260
But if you really cut through what she's saying, she's getting to the point and she's saying,
00:08:08.160
Alberta is going to be defending its own interests,
00:08:10.800
and we're going to be forging ahead and building our own relationships with the United States.
00:08:14.200
I'm not sure if you guys are aware, but Alberta already has a trade ambassador based in D.C.,
00:08:19.680
someone who lives in D.C. full-time,
00:08:21.960
ensuring that we have good trade relationships with the United States,
00:08:25.560
someone who's based there full-time to represent the Alberta government.
00:08:28.640
And, you know, I've posted some videos on X of James Bazan,
00:08:33.080
the current trade relationship ambassador there in the U.S.,
00:08:35.960
who's now, you know, especially in the limelight
00:08:37.880
and has to build relationships with the new Trump administration.
00:08:40.800
And as I said, Alberta Premier Daniel Smith will be attending Trump's inauguration.
00:08:43.860
So this is something that we can see Danielle Smith taking very seriously,
00:08:46.960
and she signals exactly what it is that Ottawa is looking for.
00:08:50.800
They want Canada to meet our NATO targets,
00:08:53.380
and they are interested in energy security,
00:08:55.700
which are two things that Ottawa could easily provide for the United States
00:08:59.100
if they were taking this issue seriously,
00:09:01.420
and if they wanted to have a good relationship with the Trump administration.
00:09:07.040
Which seems unlikely, given that they have announced that
00:09:10.580
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland is going to be the one heading up negotiations
00:09:16.000
with the Trump administration.
00:09:18.680
I covered this a little bit last week.
00:09:20.200
It seems like that was an ironic pick at best,
00:09:24.620
given that Donald Trump has already said he doesn't like Chrystia Freeland.
00:09:29.520
He said that he doesn't like Canada's negotiator
00:09:31.660
when they were negotiating the new NAFTA.
00:09:34.400
And of course, at the time, that was Chrystia Freeland.
00:09:37.000
So it does seem like an interesting pick from Team Trudeau
00:09:42.100
to signal that Chrystia Freeland was going to be the one heading up these negotiations,
00:09:45.820
when she already has a rocky relationship with Donald Trump,
00:09:50.320
so much so that he just says that he doesn't even like her,
00:09:52.860
which I know most of you in the audience will be signaling your agreement with.
00:09:57.340
She is a rather difficult personality and comes across kind of just annoying.
00:10:01.380
She was asked about how she's going to respond to the Trump administration
00:10:05.880
and why she was the best person to head up these negotiations,
00:10:10.240
given the President-elect's past comments about her.
00:10:14.000
Take a listen to what she had to say.
00:10:16.220
Donald Trump has said that he doesn't like you very much.
00:10:19.720
Donald Trump has said that he doesn't like you very much in the past.
00:10:22.480
What makes you the best person to lead the Canadian government's efforts here?
00:10:25.360
I think that President Trump will obviously speak for himself,
00:10:30.780
and I would never put words in his mouth.
00:10:33.240
But in my experience, President Trump respects strength,
00:10:38.720
and he respects people and countries who are strong and clear in defending their countries,
00:10:48.000
in defending their national interest.
00:10:50.780
That's what I've always done, and that's what I will continue to do.
00:10:55.360
I know I played that clip for you guys last week.
00:10:57.880
I'm sure some of you will have complaints about having to hear from Chrystia Freeland
00:11:01.620
two weeks in a row, and I did definitely cut it short for this week.
00:11:06.640
But just to hear the irony of what she's saying,
00:11:08.720
I think it's important to point it out once again,
00:11:10.900
when she's saying Donald Trump respects people who stand up for their own national interests
00:11:17.760
and who project strength.
00:11:19.920
Two things that Chrystia Freeland, and to a latter extent,
00:11:23.280
the true-to-liberals seem incapable of doing.
00:11:25.660
They do not project strength.
00:11:27.260
They seem incapable of standing up for their own national interests.
00:11:31.440
If you were interested in defending your country,
00:11:33.500
I think you would, at the very minimum, meet your NATO commitments.
00:11:37.080
And we haven't seen that under this administration.
00:11:39.000
We haven't seen a willingness to do that.
00:11:40.660
Even now, with President-elect, as Alberta Premier Daniel Smith rightly pointed out,
00:11:45.220
Canada could offer the United States things that the United States wants and needs from Canada.
00:11:50.140
And they are reluctant to do so because they are so busy spending government dollars on other things
00:11:57.020
that do not benefit Canadians or our national interest.
00:12:01.100
And so we'll leave that with you.
00:12:02.920
Chrystia Freeland is going to be heading up these negotiations.
00:12:05.560
I suspect that it won't go very well for her.
00:12:08.420
I'm certainly looking forward to the change in government
00:12:11.080
and hopefully the renewed efforts that Canada's negotiator will bring along with them
00:12:16.420
when we see change in those positions.
00:12:19.140
Just to close it off for this week, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith was asked about how she would,
00:12:26.060
you know, if she was willing to have this Team Canada approach.
00:12:28.260
And she said that's something that we would like to have.
00:12:30.540
But it's just not possible because we've told the federal government time and time again
00:12:35.120
that we will not accept this emissions cap.
00:12:37.600
We are not going to reduce production in Alberta's oil and energy industry.
00:12:42.800
And she was pressed a little bit further about this in her interview on CTV.
00:12:48.280
And essentially she got to the point where she said this is something that Jefferson Trudeau
00:12:51.780
is not willing to budge on.
00:12:54.480
And I think that that's so indicative of this current government.
00:12:57.960
They seem very unwilling to acknowledge when mistakes have been made
00:13:01.280
and very slow to course correct.
00:13:04.480
It seems to be sort of a new and modern phenomenon
00:13:06.820
that no matter how unhappy a nation is, government, they have their ideological drive
00:13:13.960
and they will continue to pursue that agenda no matter how unpopular it is
00:13:19.700
and no matter if it's really what the people want or not.
00:13:22.460
I suspect the part of the reason for that is because they feel some moral superiority
00:13:27.000
with that agenda.
00:13:28.480
And so even if people are suffering, they are hell-bent on continuing to push through that agenda
00:13:35.080
even if it means that Canadians are struggling as we talk about extensively on the show
00:13:39.820
with the high cost of inflation.
00:13:41.480
Justin Trudeau knows that he's not liked.
00:13:43.380
He knows that he's down in the polls.
00:13:45.100
I mean, part of it is that he's, I would assume, very narcissistic
00:13:48.260
and that he's unwilling to step aside even when his own caucus has asked him to step aside.
00:13:53.420
Part of it is, I would say, that they feel that they have a moral superiority
00:13:57.480
to continue pushing through these policies that Canadians don't want and didn't vote for
00:14:02.200
as evidenced in the low poll numbers that the Trudeau Liberals have
00:14:05.780
and in the fact that they are trying to continuously secure these agreements
00:14:09.380
with the NDP and with the Bloc to keep them in power
00:14:11.900
in return for giving the parties what they want
00:14:14.920
rather than giving Canadians what they want and they need.
00:14:18.500
I think the best example of this in recent history
00:14:20.820
is when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau essentially said
00:14:24.160
that climate change is more important than feeding your kids.
00:14:27.640
I'm sure you guys caught this one, but if not, take a listen.
00:14:30.500
I saw the caption for it.
00:14:31.800
I assumed his words were being taken out of context
00:14:34.100
and then I heard it for myself.
00:14:36.140
Take a look.
00:14:37.140
It's really, really easy when you're in a short-term survive.
00:14:41.640
I've got to be able to pay the rent this month.
00:14:43.500
I've got to be able to buy groceries for my kids
00:14:45.560
to say, okay, let's put climate change as a slightly lower priority.
00:14:53.460
And that's something that's instinctive.
00:14:55.300
When the storm comes, you want to hunker down
00:14:57.420
and just sort of huddle up and wait for it to blow over.
00:14:59.900
We can't do that around climate change.
00:15:03.740
Truly shocking stuff, and I have to note that the irony of that
00:15:06.620
is that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was recently in Brazil
00:15:09.700
and he brought his daughter.
00:15:11.680
I mean, nothing necessarily wrong with that.
00:15:13.360
There was some criticism that he appeared to be skipping
00:15:15.520
some of the events while he was out walking on the beach
00:15:18.700
with his daughter, but the irony of telling Canadians
00:15:21.600
that climate change should be just as important
00:15:24.180
to them as feeding your kids while your daughter is able
00:15:26.440
to travel around on a private jet,
00:15:28.740
paid for them by the Canadian taxpayer,
00:15:31.180
and you have the audacity to tell Canadians
00:15:34.520
that climate change really should be as important
00:15:37.720
as putting food on the table for your kids.
00:15:40.340
Totally out of touch.
00:15:41.680
All right, everyone, let me know what you think
00:15:44.240
in the comment section below.
00:15:45.660
Do you think that this is good news for Alberta,
00:15:48.640
that the Premier has signaled that it will be forging
00:15:51.040
its own relationship with the United States?
00:15:53.240
What could that mean for Alberta's future?
00:15:55.520
And do you think that the rest of Canada
00:15:56.820
is going to get on board, or do you think
00:15:58.740
that they are going to be left behind
00:16:00.840
as Alberta uses its oil advantage
00:16:02.880
to secure a strong relationship with the United States?
00:16:05.420
Let me know what you think in the comment section below.
00:16:08.180
I'll be sure to take a look at some of those.
00:16:09.620
I hope that you guys have a great weekend.
00:16:11.980
I'll see you next week.
00:16:12.860
God bless.
Link copied!