Juno News - February 28, 2022


Trudeau’s public safety minister claims there were threats of rape at freedom convoy


Episode Stats

Length

12 minutes

Words per Minute

182.8021

Word Count

2,359

Sentence Count

87


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.480 Minister, I just want to talk a bit about the thresholds that your government has made the case have been met to invoke this extraordinary power in the Emergencies Act.
00:00:09.540 As you know, the threshold would include a threat to the security of Canada, which includes things like espionage, sabotage, and specifically the support of a threat or the use of serious violence.
00:00:20.960 And that's very much in line with much of your opening remarks, which I'll just quote you.
00:00:24.980 You did say it in French, but the English version would have said, it was an absolute necessity that we enacted the emergency measures needed to keep Canadians safe.
00:00:33.800 The invocation of the Emergencies Act sent a clear message to those who decide to participate or support in these illegal protests, including impacting the safety of the public.
00:00:41.980 You also said, we will not yield our responsibilities to Canadians.
00:00:44.800 We must inspire their confidence that their safety is protected.
00:00:48.360 Minister, do you believe that our safety was in jeopardy with the protests in Ottawa?
00:00:52.440 Well, certainly the size, scope, and scale of the illegal blockades at a number of borders and ports of entry, as well as the illegal occupation in Ottawa, met the threshold under the Emergencies Act.
00:01:08.720 That advice and that decision to invoke it was informed by non-partisan professionals, including the commissioner who's on with us today, as well as other branches of law enforcement.
00:01:20.320 So, yes, Ms. Dancho, we believe the threshold was met under the Emergencies Act.
00:01:24.860 So, you believe that there was a serious threat of violence to the national security of Canada on February 17th.
00:01:30.800 You also said, this is a serious situation.
00:01:32.660 You must resist the temptation to dismiss these as isolated incidents.
00:01:37.340 You went on to say the core of the movement is of anger, animosity, and violence.
00:01:41.640 And you were referring to if protesters would like to come to Ottawa.
00:01:45.940 You were saying to them, you may be tying yourself to dangerous criminal activity.
00:01:49.960 You also, of course, have insinuated that several of the individuals, or you said, and I quote, several of the individuals at Coutts have strong ties to a far-right extreme organization with leaders who are in Ottawa.
00:02:01.320 So, you're again saying these strong ties.
00:02:03.900 So, again, do you believe that there was a threat to public safety in Ottawa?
00:02:08.000 Well, to be clear, Ms. Dancho, those aren't just my insinuations.
00:02:11.660 Hundreds of charges and arrests have been carried out by law enforcement throughout the course of the illegal blockades, not only in Ottawa, but as well as in Alberta and British Columbia.
00:02:22.540 And I would point out, Ms. Dancho, that those charges are very severe, including conspiracy to commit murder, which carries with it a life sentence.
00:02:28.900 So, they're not merely the insinuations of me or the government.
00:02:32.900 There have, in fact, been a number of very serious and grave criminal investigations, which have been carried out and are ongoing.
00:02:39.960 Right. Specifically, though, you're making the argument that the threshold to national security, it's a threat to public safety.
00:02:45.500 You tied those extremists at Coutts to the protests in Ottawa.
00:02:51.600 So, do you have evidence that there was the threat in Ottawa that you saw at Coutts?
00:02:57.720 Well, again, just to clarify, those comments related to a number of public reports, which had been issued at the time, tracking the movements of some in Ottawa to other border points, including in Alberta.
00:03:09.220 But I would just point out that from the very outset of the illegal blockade, that a number of organizers and so-called leaders of the purported Freedom Convoy had made a number of profoundly concerning and extremist statements calling for the overthrow of the government through violence, if necessary.
00:03:29.100 Some of the leaders have been quoted as saying, again, very publicly, that if necessary, through the use of bullets and other similar force.
00:03:37.940 So, those are all very reported and documented and catalogued in the public domain, Ms. Densho.
00:03:43.720 So, you believe that there was a serious national security threat to public safety?
00:03:48.040 I know the Prime Minister was also said when he was invoking the act that first day, he said, quote, this is about keeping Canadians safe.
00:03:54.580 We will not allow illegal and dangerous activities to continue.
00:03:57.780 So, from your remarks and from the Prime Minister's remarks, you believe the threshold for invoking the act for the purpose of, that you believe that there was a national security threat to public safety.
00:04:09.060 So, I mean, Minister, I walked to West Block for two weeks past these protests.
00:04:15.680 If there was such a threat to public safety, how could you have allowed members of Parliament to walk by that protest every day?
00:04:22.900 Well, I would say a couple of things in response to that, Ms. Densho.
00:04:28.000 First, as you know, the Sergeant-at-Arms, in coordination with the Parliamentary Protective Service and the RCMP, did offer additional protection for parliamentarians, as well as staff who were working on the Hill.
00:04:40.600 But the other thing I would say, Ms. Densho is, respectfully, your experience was not the experience of the many thousands of Ottowans who were laid to siege as a result of…
00:04:51.600 Mr. Minister, if I may just interrupt, I apologize.
00:04:53.640 But just to be clear, you were saying the extraordinary high thresholds of these incredible, never-before-invoked emergency powers met the threshold that this was a national public safety security issue.
00:05:04.600 And you connected it to the ongoing executes, you're insinuating that that was happening in Ottawa.
00:05:11.600 That's the main argument that you've made for the purpose of invoking this act.
00:05:15.600 And yet I walked every single day for two weeks past these protests.
00:05:19.600 So you can imagine the anxiety that that causes to parliamentarians, to Ottawa staff, we can go on, but yet there was…
00:05:26.600 Like, I just don't understand how you could be saying, on one hand, there's all these strong ties and this is a national emergency for public safety.
00:05:34.600 And I walked every day by these protests.
00:05:37.600 It just doesn't really add up at all.
00:05:40.600 Mr. Minister, sorry, just 10 seconds, Minister.
00:05:43.600 Well, I would say first, it's not an insinuation.
00:05:45.600 We got the advice from our law enforcement that we'd met the threshold.
00:05:49.600 And secondly, Ms. Dancho…
00:05:50.600 I just can't believe you put us in danger in that way, to be honest.
00:05:51.600 I just can't believe you put us in danger in that way, to be honest.
00:05:52.600 Like, that seems very irresponsible to me.
00:05:53.600 There were Ottowans who were subjected to intimidation, harassment, threats of rape.
00:05:57.600 I mean, the… and those were all supported by…
00:05:59.600 So how could we have possibly been allowed to walk by that every day?
00:06:03.600 Minister, I did want to follow up on our line of questioning earlier.
00:06:07.600 Again, I was asking for evidence of a serious national security threat to public safety as your government arguing that that's…
00:06:15.600 That transpired and therefore the threshold was met to invoke these extraordinary powers that have never been invoked before.
00:06:22.600 And then you mentioned that there were threats of rape and that certain organizers talked about using bullets.
00:06:29.600 So is that your evidence that there was a serious national public threat to security for Canadians?
00:06:36.600 Well, Ms. Dancho, that's just the tip of the iceberg.
00:06:40.600 You had blockades across the country.
00:06:42.600 There were hundreds of charges laid as a result of the blockades.
00:06:46.600 There were hundreds of charges and arrests carried out.
00:06:48.600 I apologize for interrupting, but we…
00:06:49.600 That flowed from the illegal occupation and…
00:06:51.600 Correct, but again…
00:06:52.600 It's not just the insinuations is what I'm getting at, Ms. Dancho.
00:06:55.600 Right, but the blockades, of course, they had to come down.
00:06:58.600 They were illegal.
00:06:59.600 But again, we're talking about the argument that was made by your government that the threshold,
00:07:03.600 the very high threshold of a national threat to security to the public safety of Canadians,
00:07:08.600 that that threshold was met.
00:07:10.600 And then when I pressed you, you said that there was allegations of rape and, you know,
00:07:14.600 some organizers said something about bullets.
00:07:16.600 So again, I was walking by those folks.
00:07:18.600 So if you believe that that's true, again, I'll just ask you, why would you let us parliamentarians…
00:07:23.600 Point of order…
00:07:24.600 Point of order, Mr. Chair.
00:07:29.600 Point of order, coming from…
00:07:31.600 I can't see a hand up.
00:07:33.600 Mr. Noehamid, go ahead.
00:07:34.600 Point of order on Mr. Chairman, understanding order…
00:07:40.600 Understanding order 11…
00:07:42.600 I mean, this is a repetitive questioning.
00:07:44.600 We already had this question asked.
00:07:46.600 We have the administrative for a limited amount of time.
00:07:47.600 So I'm wondering if you might be able to move on to non-repetitive questions?
00:07:50.600 Point of order, Mr. Chairman.
00:07:52.600 uh dane i'll just if i could just respond to that thanks um mr chair i think that the minister of
00:07:59.080 public safety of county who's formerly a crown prosecutor is able to handle my line of questioning
00:08:04.520 just fine he does not need the assistance of liberal members from this committee am i correct
00:08:08.440 mr mendicino i'm happy to take your questions thank you mr mendicino if you'll allow me mr
00:08:14.760 chair i'll continue on one minute and 26 seconds um again so i'll just i'll just put it to you
00:08:19.560 because i am genuinely concerned about this i mean women on this panel right now walk by that protest
00:08:24.840 every day and you're saying that there was a serious threat to public safety so again can you confirm
00:08:29.320 that there was a serious threat to our public safety walking by that ottawa protest every day
00:08:33.720 and thereby met the threshold for invoking this act well ms dancho at the risk of generalizing i would
00:08:41.960 say for every one example of a safe passage there are probably thousands who did not feel any public
00:08:48.680 safety and far from me simply insinuating that there was a lack of public safety in order one
00:08:53.960 only has to take a look at the extensive criminal enforcement operations that led to serious charges
00:09:00.120 and yes ms dancho although it i say it regretfully there were individuals who were intimidated harassed
00:09:06.520 there were expressions of hate there were apartment buildings that were chained there were efforts to
00:09:10.440 set buildings on fire the individuals who lived in ottawa were terrorized the individuals were trying to
00:09:15.320 go to work in windsor and elsewhere in southwestern ontario could not because of the illegal blockades
00:09:20.520 and all of these events tied together constituted a national emergency and when we arrived at that
00:09:26.360 we gave law enforcement the tools that they need to get the job done and i'm very happy to say ms dancho
00:09:31.320 they did it with the least amount of force in a very professional manner and as a result now the
00:09:36.040 situation is far better right i appreciate that but again my line of questioning is that you've said that
00:09:40.760 there was a serious threat to public safety and therefore the threshold for invoking this act was
00:09:44.840 met and again in all the things you just listed so but if that's if that's the case uh then why would
00:09:50.760 you permit members of parliament their staff and journalists to walk by this protest that was so
00:09:56.920 threatening and so dangerous and so violent by your own words today why would you allow us to even get
00:10:02.680 close to that protest if it was such a threat to public national safety and security i just that really
00:10:08.280 doesn't make sense to me why you would do that it it's a fair question miss dancho i would simply say
00:10:14.360 we offered additional protection to mps and as for journalists trust me i reached out to some of them
00:10:19.480 and urged them to be very careful but they probably wouldn't have listened to me anyways because they
00:10:23.560 were concerned about reporting about the facts miss dancho and it is regrettable that a number of
00:10:28.600 individuals within your uh your party the concerted party seem to want to gloss over the facts but this is
00:10:35.080 to our detriment collectively and i would just hope that on sober reflection that you would see that
00:10:39.640 as a result of the steps that we took that we've restored public safety in order because that was
00:10:44.120 what we had to do i appreciate that uh mr manichino but in in response i would hope that you would have
00:10:49.960 some serious sober reflection that if the claims you're making are true that if national security and
00:10:54.680 public safety was in jeopardy threats of rape in ottawa bullets all these other things that you said if
00:10:59.400 that's the case i hope that you have serious over reflection about the fact that you allowed members of
00:11:04.760 parliament journalists and staff to walk amongst the protest for uh three weeks i think that that
00:11:10.360 requires serious sober reflection if that is in fact the case mr chair i'll cede the rest of my time to mr brock
00:11:18.760 which i have a minute and 30 seconds all right mr brock
00:11:25.240 all right 30 seconds my apology mr chair how much time do i have 30 seconds thank you i think the most disturbing
00:11:31.720 aspect uh minister mendocino what i heard is this rape allegation a very heinous serious crime we debated
00:11:39.800 this particular issue for over 40 hours not once did the prime minister did you or any other senior
00:11:47.960 member of cabinet or any member of your backbench raise a rape allegation so my question to you is
00:11:54.440 very pointed if that allegation did not result in a criminal charge it's not rape under the criminal
00:12:00.200 charge as you know you're a lawyer it's a second allegation sexual assault if there is no criminal
00:12:05.960 charge will you undertake to provide this this committee without sir the question please please
00:12:11.640 have respect for the chair the question has been put mr manichino you have 10 seconds to respond
00:12:18.600 the absence of criminal charges doesn't mean it doesn't happen it doesn't happen didn't happen
00:12:23.480 in ottawa and doesn't happen every day mr brock and i would think you would know that thank you
00:12:30.200 excellent
00:12:33.960 so
00:12:41.160 bye
00:12:41.960 bye
00:12:48.840 my
00:12:53.000 and