True North's Andrew Lawton with Tanya Granic Allen
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
215.91013
Summary
In this episode, First Educators and Parents President Tanya granik-allen and former PC leadership candidate Tanya Granik-Allen talk about the controversial sex ed curriculum in Ontario's public schools. They discuss the role of parents in shaping the curriculum and the role they played in helping to elect Doug Ford as premier.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
I'm joined by Parents as First Educators president, Tanya Granik-Allen, also a former
00:00:09.240
leadership contestant for the PC Party of Ontario. Tanya, good to be with you. Thanks very much.
00:00:13.620
Thanks for having me, Andrew. So you really, before entering politics as a leadership
00:00:19.100
candidate, had set the tone for discussions about the sex ed curriculum. And when you first brought
00:00:23.480
up that issue, you were speaking to a PC Party that not only didn't want to listen on that issue,
00:00:28.820
but had really turned its back on people after promising one thing, doing another. And you look
00:00:36.020
at the PC Party today, you were instrumental in getting Doug Ford elected as leader. The issue of
00:00:41.940
the sex ed curriculum was discussed at great length during the campaign. The government has already
00:00:45.900
taken some action on that that we'll get into the details of. But did you envision this would be the
00:00:51.060
road that Ontario would be going down even a year ago? No, a year ago, we were, I guess, hot on the
00:00:57.120
heels of Patrick Brown's flip flop from his commitment to repeal the sex ed. And I think most
00:01:02.460
common sense Ontarians and common sense conservatives were a little concerned with the direction the
00:01:07.140
party was taking, not just with the sex ed, but also with questionable nominations and potentially
00:01:13.420
corruptive practices and whatnot. So, but with this, the sex ed file, yeah, we had no idea.
00:01:19.320
My colleague, she said, no, Patrick won't be the leader going into the election. And she had this
00:01:23.460
idea, but I said, no, no. I mean, we're just a few months away. And then all of a sudden things
00:01:27.840
happened in January and we have a completely different premier than I think we thought we
00:01:31.500
would. And that shows a lot of things. I mean, first off, you can never take anything for granted
00:01:36.060
in politics. A lot can change. I know that you weren't gearing up for a leadership race until you
00:01:39.840
were. I never in my life thought I would ever run for politics in general, let alone the leader of a
00:01:44.860
party. Because I had interviewed you on my radio show when you were the PAFE president the first
00:01:49.220
time around, and you were not gearing towards political office. You were trying to get politicians
00:01:54.080
to respond to a constituency that was being ignored at the time, which was parents. Now we have a
00:01:59.440
government that has said it's going to listen to parents. I was a candidate in the election. So I was
00:02:03.240
hearing from a lot of people that the sex ed curriculum was a problem. And I wanted to ask you
00:02:09.480
why you think that issue gained such traction? Because I was not hearing about it from the usual
00:02:14.460
suspects of social conservative causes. I was hearing about it from people that had never
00:02:18.360
been politically engaged, new Canadians, Christians, Muslims, non-religious people.
00:02:24.080
Of all the social issues, why do you think the sex ed curriculum was the one that really gained so
00:02:28.200
much traction? Well, the curriculum per se was just so, it's just so terrible. And we're talking
00:02:33.680
about the Kathleen Wynne radical sex ed curriculum. There were just so many elements that were terrible.
00:02:38.160
And I think we've had about three years now of this curriculum in the classroom. And parents know
00:02:43.040
they're sitting down at the dinner table and children are coming home from school and discussing
00:02:46.460
things that parents didn't think in a million years they would hear come out of their kids' mouths.
00:02:50.320
So parents understood that there's something going on in the classroom that they didn't like.
00:02:53.780
You mentioned new Canadians. Most new Canadians, they come from other countries where they may not
00:02:58.980
be able to exercise their democratic freedoms, like freedom of speech or freedom of religion.
00:03:03.240
And they come to Canada in search of those freedoms and hope to be welcomed in a society like that.
00:03:08.700
And they want to impart those potentially traditional family values to their children.
00:03:14.220
And to have a school system that's running completely against that is shocking for a lot
00:03:19.380
of new Canadians. And they found their voice and they're using it. And I'm grateful for them.
00:03:23.120
And I think it's important that people have that opportunity to exercise those freedoms.
00:03:28.060
And what's most important to most families is their children. You go and attack children or you
00:03:32.680
try to go and sexualize children, you're going to hear from a lot of angry parents. And I think we saw
00:03:36.560
that in this election. That's a good point. And more than any other social issue, sex ed really
00:03:43.660
cuts at how children are being raised because it is the state that is by many measures trying to
00:03:51.900
replace parents when it comes to different belief systems and different value systems.
00:03:55.940
And when you look at even the name of your organization, Parents as First Educators, I think
00:03:59.460
that the curriculum entering the political discussions was a wake-up call for a lot of parents to actually
00:04:04.700
reclaim that. And I think that parents, by and large, many of them didn't know the rights that
00:04:09.340
they did have to get involved in their kids' education. And that was something that was
00:04:13.200
really encouraging to see. Even outside of how people voted, just parents that are actually
00:04:16.720
stepping up and being a lot more engaged. Because that now is the battle. If we say parents
00:04:21.240
weren't consulted, parents need to make sure that they are participating in the consultation.
00:04:24.880
Precisely. And I think, you know, parents are busy. Sometimes you have double income,
00:04:29.520
both mother and father are working. They send their children to school with the good faith and trust
00:04:34.240
in that the government is instructing teachers to educate them properly. But when we're teaching
00:04:38.620
elements like the unscientific gender theory to children and using the classroom more as a vehicle
00:04:44.780
of social engineering, the red flags go up. So, yeah, I think parents are waking up. And I'm glad
00:04:51.440
many organizations, including my own, that are sounding alarm that, you know, parents, you are
00:04:55.760
the first educators. You will always be the first educators for your children. So pay attention to
00:05:01.000
what's going on and make sure that they're learning what they should be and avoiding what they shouldn't
00:05:05.480
be learning. Let's talk about where we are now. You were not a candidate by the time the election
00:05:10.460
rolled around. The PC party was very clear that it didn't signal any change in policy. They were still
00:05:15.900
committed to repealing the sex ed curriculum. You were very swift to say it needs to happen by September,
00:05:20.700
which the government has done. Are you happy with the direction we see from the government now as
00:05:26.580
far as what they've committed to do by September? Well, so last week I was ecstatic and I said this
00:05:31.700
was a terrific victory for parents and children. But unfortunately, just a few days ago, the issue
00:05:37.040
of repeal has been evolving. And I always said repeal and replace. And it was the Ford government that
00:05:42.000
brought in the restore. And it seems like that's where they're tripping up because there's been a lot
00:05:45.580
of attacks from the left, big surprise there, saying, oh, you're going to take people back to
00:05:49.940
the dark ages and whatnot, which is completely not true. But the Minister of Education this week
00:05:55.640
mentioned that the children will still be learning gender identity theory, or she suggested that. And
00:06:00.220
I'm asking for clarification. Will children learn this theory or not when they return to school in
00:06:04.840
September? Parents want to know. The society wants to know. And I think we need a little bit more
00:06:08.860
clarity on that. I think Premier Ford has tried to clarify a little bit that parents are the first
00:06:14.340
educators. He came up with some excellent language on that yesterday. And I'm happy to see that.
00:06:18.760
But I think that the government needs to really make their position clear. And considering the,
00:06:23.580
again, the recent, I guess their gaffe, they need to clarify, will that controversial material be
00:06:30.800
taught or not? We've seen a number of teachers, isolated examples, but still it's been part of the
00:06:36.140
discussion on this that have said they're going to, you know, still teach all of these other things
00:06:40.760
anyway. And we've had some that have said they'll do it outside the school system, to which I
00:06:44.300
say, power to them if they want to do it. Teachers who don't want to play ball on this, I mean,
00:06:53.540
Well, I think it's absurd, first of all. Teachers are great, and we're happy to have them,
00:06:59.860
and they serve such an important role. But the role is very clear. You are to teach the prescribed
00:07:04.080
curriculum. And if the curriculum, and if you want to go outside that scope, if you, you know,
00:07:09.020
really want to instruct your classroom on masturbation, or teach that class on, or introduce
00:07:13.400
the topic of oral sex in your classroom, or you really want to introduce the six genders to your
00:07:17.860
children at age eight, which is what we have now with the Kathleen Wynne sex ed curriculum,
00:07:23.360
that's, and our curriculum doesn't have that, then that's crazy. If that's not what we have laid out,
00:07:27.600
then you cannot teach that. And I think parents, again, put their good faith in the teachers to
00:07:31.260
teach the prescribed curriculum. And let me be very clear, we hear from lots of teachers. Yes,
00:07:35.840
we're parents as first educators. That's our organization. But teachers call us all the time.
00:07:39.580
We received so many messages saying, thank you, that I don't have to teach this awful curriculum.
00:07:44.780
I don't have to sexualize my students in the classroom. Because let's face it,
00:07:48.000
what teacher really wants to talk about gender theory to eight year olds? It's confusing for us,
00:07:52.340
most of us adults, let alone a child in grade three. The media and the opposition have come at this
00:07:58.100
issue by saying we're going back to the stone age, like you indicated earlier, by going back to the
00:08:02.140
1998 curriculum. They say Doug Ford's rolling back the clock 20 years. In actuality, we're rolling
00:08:06.900
it back three years. I mean, that curriculum was working right up until a few years ago. But I do
00:08:11.300
have to ask, I mean, there are legitimate grievances that people raise that that curriculum didn't
00:08:15.720
address a lot of the modern realities like the internet, like cyberbullying, like sexting.
00:08:20.980
Do you think that there is going to be something missing when those are not part of what's being taught?
00:08:25.460
Look, I agree with Premier Kathleen Wynne, the former Premier, that yes, this curriculum needed to be
00:08:29.840
updated 100%, especially given what she said in light of technology advances. That was the excuse
00:08:34.920
she used to update the curriculum. And I agree. But she pulled a bait and switch. She used that excuse
00:08:40.380
as an opportunity to actually advance her social engineering and the gender theory. Why do I say
00:08:45.800
that? Because she failed to not once address internet pornography in this curriculum for elementary
00:08:52.140
school students. And that is terrible. Now, I know people said, well, that's because, you know,
00:08:57.080
the deputy minister of education at that time was is now a convicted child pornographer. Maybe that
00:09:01.720
had something to do with it. I don't know what I do know that if she truly wanted to update the
00:09:05.940
curriculum because of technology, she failed. So, yes, we must have elements that keep up to date.
00:09:10.800
The curriculum must be updated, but it must be done so in a responsible manner. And Kathleen Wynne,
00:09:15.500
unfortunately, to simply use that as an opportunity to advance her social engineering.
00:09:19.040
But with that reversion that we believe we're headed towards in September, and I agree with you about
00:09:23.200
the need for clarity. Do you think we're going to be missing out on something significant if
00:09:27.640
those cyber elements are not included? Look, I think there are certain themes are woven throughout
00:09:33.460
all sorts of curriculum. I think parents are the first educators, and I think they in their home
00:09:38.180
are instituting those those limitations. For example, you know, parents monitor what their
00:09:43.160
children do on the internet, or at least they should be doing that. And, you know, I know kids are
00:09:47.220
sometimes accessing things on their school Wi-Fi that they shouldn't. There are overarching policies
00:09:52.020
within a school that kind of regulate what children should or should not be accessing. I think that
00:09:56.140
needs to be toughened up. Look, I don't know how long this consultation will take to bring up a new
00:10:01.140
curriculum. I hope it happens in a good, timely fashion, and I hope the Minister of Education,
00:10:06.160
you know, updates those those important areas. We saw very legitimate concerns about how little
00:10:12.780
consultation there was. And I know the government loved to point to the 4,000 number for parents,
00:10:16.720
but there was very little insight, even among a lot of critics of people like you, that were saying
00:10:22.100
they didn't know how those 4,000 were selected, didn't know that they were handpicked, it was one
00:10:25.960
per school, it wasn't really a representative of the entire cross-section of parents that we have.
00:10:32.540
But at the end of the day, they're going to be parents that have differing beliefs on what should
00:10:36.760
be taught. And the government's going to have to pick a side, and they're going to have to pick,
00:10:40.260
you know, the parents that want a really permissive progressive curriculum,
00:10:43.000
or they're going to have to pick the parents that want a really conservative, pared-down one.
00:10:47.400
And at a certain point, you can't compromise between these two groups, you need to pick a
00:10:51.620
side. How should a government navigate that? Okay, so just to clarify, even though Kathleen
00:10:56.760
Wynne made the claim 4,000 parents were consulted through a Freedom of Information request, it
00:11:01.120
turned out that just over 1,600 were handpicked by principals. Just to clarify that, because I
00:11:05.400
know that's what's been going around. At some point you said they're going to have to pick a side.
00:11:10.440
Well, actually, it's very simple. We just need to get back to basics curriculum. We're doing it with
00:11:14.100
math. We should do the same with sex ed. We don't expect unscientific, unproven things like gender
00:11:19.220
theory to be taught. That's reasonable. You know, do we need to keep current? Of course we do. Things
00:11:24.400
get updated from time to time. This is the time. I don't think one side should win or the other side
00:11:30.140
should win. I think we teach children the basics, and if parents want to seek extra education for
00:11:34.020
their children, look, if a parent wants their kids to learn karate, they take them for karate class. If there's a
00:11:38.080
parent who really wants a child to learn eight genders, then perhaps they can hire a gender
00:11:42.140
expert to come into the home and explain that to them there. But the classroom must teach the basics
00:11:46.600
and must not be used as a tool of social engineering. You touched on something very important, though,
00:11:51.900
which is that all of these parents that are concerned that the sky is falling about this
00:11:55.300
need to be stepping up, and if they think it's so essential that their children are taught certain
00:11:59.340
things, teaching it. And I wonder where we've gone so wrong as a society that because your family
00:12:05.620
thinks something is good, the government should make that the case for every family. And there's
00:12:10.060
such an inconsistency because eventually those parents are going to find that there's a government
00:12:13.280
in power that stands for different things than they do. And they're not going to like when that
00:12:17.240
government turns around and says, well, actually, no, we're not doing it your way. We're doing it our
00:12:20.780
way. Well, that's why I've always been very clear. We need a science-based sex ed that, like I said,
00:12:25.740
teaches the basics. You know, I think, for example, the words love and marriage ought to be
00:12:29.640
mentioned in a curriculum. It's not currently mentioned once in the curriculum. The word love on a
00:12:33.360
curriculum on sex ed. It's shocking for many. But no, I think the government needs to always respect
00:12:38.260
parental rights. Parental rights in direction of their education of their children is enshrined in
00:12:42.520
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. So this is an international right. And I think the government
00:12:48.020
must know its place. So I'm optimistic that the forward government will respect that and will
00:12:53.200
always enshrine parents as the first educators and respect parental authority. Let's say you get a
00:12:57.580
win on this. At the end of the day, we get a curriculum that you're happy with, that your members are happy
00:13:01.180
with. Do you hang up your hat and go home? Well, a win on this will always, I'll just understand a
00:13:06.760
full repeal of this curriculum must always include always advanced notification of sexual education
00:13:12.300
lessons and allow the parents to opt out. Because like you said, not all parents will be happy with
00:13:16.540
it. So let's always respect those parental rights. Let's always give them an opt out without
00:13:20.240
repercussions from the principals. But what do I do once we move on from this issue? Well, you know,
00:13:26.580
there are so many more areas that we need to work on to undo the damage of the Kathleen Wynne government.
00:13:32.100
For example, Bill 89, which regulates Children's and Youth Services. We know right now children are
00:13:38.020
being removed from homes if their parents do not agree with them and switching sexes and engaging and
00:13:44.860
accessing sex change procedures, be it hormonal therapies or other medical therapies. That would be
00:13:53.380
considered a form of abuse according to this previous government and they are removing kids.
00:13:57.020
We need to fix Bill 89. There are many other things that need to be done to undo the damage from that
00:14:02.060
last government. And I think to go back to where we started off this discussion, what's happened to
00:14:07.640
the PC party and now to Ontario in the last six months, really, that's how long it's been since
00:14:12.320
Patrick Bown stepped down, I think really reinforced why you should never give up a cause. Because had you
00:14:16.800
just given up and said, you know what, we're not going to get what we need in this party,
00:14:20.280
the course of what happened in the months following that would have been very different than they
00:14:25.560
were. So good work. They certainly will. Thank you, Andrew. Thank you very much.
00:14:27.840
Tanya Granik-Allen, President of Parents as First Educators. Thank you so much.
00:14:31.100
Thanks. All right. For the True North Initiative, I'm Andrew Lawton.