ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- May 07, 2025
Trump brings up '51st state' while meeting with Carney
Episode Stats
Length
19 minutes
Words per Minute
150.40747
Word Count
2,953
Sentence Count
130
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
00:00:00.000
U.S. President Donald Trump stuck by his stance that Canada should become the 51st state in his
00:00:10.400
first meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney. Alberta Premier Daniel Smith shut down attempts
00:00:15.480
by Ontario Premier Doug Ford to weigh in on Alberta's sovereignty movement. One Vancouver
00:00:20.440
city councillor has proposed banning the sale of gun-shaped lighters, citing public safety concerns.
00:00:27.600
Hello Canada, it's Wednesday, May 7th, and this is the True North Daily Brief. I'm Cosmin Jirja.
00:00:33.360
And I'm Noah Jarvis.
00:00:34.700
We've got you covered with all the news you need to know. Let's discuss the top stories of the day
00:00:39.780
and the True North exclusives you won't hear anywhere else.
00:00:46.760
Prime Minister Mark Carney initially received a chummy welcome from U.S. President Donald Trump
00:00:52.160
during their first White House meeting. In a media availability in the Oval Office on Tuesday,
00:00:58.280
Trump and Carney traded personal compliments and political praise with one another and committed
00:01:04.200
to working together to improve trade relations. Trump congratulated Carney on his election victory
00:01:10.460
and the Liberal Party's political comeback, crediting himself for helping the Liberals.
00:01:15.340
Things quickly unraveled for Carney, though, during the Q&A when Trump resumed his rhetoric
00:01:21.040
about Canada becoming the 51st state. Trump said, quote,
00:01:26.220
It would be a massive tax cut for Canadian citizens. I'm a real estate developer at heart,
00:01:31.520
and when you get rid of that artificially drawn line, somebody drew that artificially drawn line
00:01:36.580
many years ago with a ruler, just like a straight line right across the top of the country.
00:01:41.380
When you look at the beautiful formation, that's the way it was meant to be.
00:01:46.480
Carney responded in kind, saying that some places, like the White House, Buckingham Palace,
00:01:51.640
and Canada will never be for sale. Trump quickly replied, saying, quote,
00:01:56.660
Never say never.
00:01:57.960
As you know from real estate, there are some places that are never for sale.
00:02:02.320
That's true.
00:02:02.720
We're sitting in one right now, you know, Buckingham Palace that you visited as well.
00:02:06.560
And having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign last several months,
00:02:13.620
it's not for sale, won't be for sale ever.
00:02:16.900
But the opportunity is in the partnership and what we can build together.
00:02:22.220
And we have done that in the past.
00:02:23.700
And part of that, as the president just said, is with respect to our own security.
00:02:28.180
And my government is committed for a step change in our investment in Canadian security
00:02:35.040
and our partnership.
00:02:36.500
And I'll say this as well, that the president has revitalized international security,
00:02:42.720
revitalized NATO, and us playing our full weight in NATO.
00:02:46.080
The overall meeting was positive as Carney and Trump seemed friendly and far more affable
00:03:09.980
than Trump's tense relationship with Trudeau.
00:03:12.540
Trump said about Carney,
00:03:14.340
I think I was probably the greatest thing that happened to him.
00:03:17.560
His party was losing by a lot and he ended up winning.
00:03:20.960
So I really want to congratulate him with probably one of the greatest comebacks in the history
00:03:26.480
of politics, maybe even greater than mine.
00:03:29.720
For Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney meeting the US president for the first time, and they'll
00:03:35.300
have to work together for several years.
00:03:38.380
But I don't know if you saw the clip before the meeting, I think this was yesterday when
00:03:43.720
Trump was asked about it, and he sort of shrugged his shoulders and almost said, what meeting?
00:03:49.040
As if it wasn't as important to the US president.
00:03:52.380
But what other topics were raised during this meeting that Canadians may be concerned about?
00:03:59.720
Was anything achieved regarding the ongoing trade war and the tariffs leveled against Canada?
00:04:05.740
So on the first question, Mark Carney said that he would be working to ensure that he's going
00:04:10.700
to rebuild the Canadian military to help secure the continental defense.
00:04:16.000
And that is one of Donald Trump's main priorities for Canada.
00:04:19.720
One of his main grievances is that the United States is, quote unquote, subsidizing Canada while
00:04:25.620
also having to secure Canada and protect Canada if they were to be invaded by any other foreign
00:04:32.680
threats. And he believes that this is not a reciprocal relationship, that the United States
00:04:37.220
is pulling far more of the weight in securing North America's defense, and that Canada is
00:04:43.280
not doing enough. So Mark Carney reiterated the point that he would be working toward building
00:04:49.420
up Canada's military. And on the campaign trail, he committed to reaching that NATO target of
00:04:57.180
spending 2% of GDP on defense. And on tariffs, President Trump, he said openly, outright, that
00:05:07.220
he would not be dropping any of the tariffs on Canada, which was kind of the main point of
00:05:12.800
the trip, that Mark Carney go down there to basically pitch the case for why the United States should
00:05:19.260
not be imposing tariffs on Canada. And Mark Carney's big election pitch during the past couple months
00:05:27.480
was that he would be able to work with Donald Trump to fight for Canada and to get the Americans
00:05:33.920
to remove their tariffs on Canadian goods. So Trump just stating outright in the initial meeting before
00:05:41.060
they had closed doors meetings that tariffs were not on the table, sort of deflated some of
00:05:48.340
Mark Carney's hopes that he would be able to get the president to back down, at least on some of
00:05:54.700
the tariffs today. But Mark Carney held a media availability at the Canadian embassy in Washington
00:06:01.740
just not too long after he held his closed doors meetings with Trump. And he said that while he was
00:06:10.180
not able to get the Americans to budge on tariffs today, that it is an ongoing process that they will be
00:06:16.320
working with the Americans over the next few weeks, the next few months in order to negotiate a deal
00:06:23.500
that would see the United States dropping some or all of the recently imposed tariffs in favor of
00:06:30.560
reworking some of the details of the USMCA. And on the USMCA, when Trump was asked whether or not he would
00:06:37.860
scrap the USMCA, Donald Trump praised the deal that he negotiated in his first term. He slammed NAFTA
00:06:45.880
as a deal that should never have been signed. But he did reaffirm his commitment to the USMCA and said
00:06:53.200
that he would like to see that deal come back. And Carney responded by saying that yes, he would
00:07:00.040
be reaffirming the USMCA, but that the deal needs some slight tweaks in order to achieve some of the
00:07:09.640
goals that Canada has in these negotiations in the next few months. So it remains to be seen whether
00:07:15.820
or not the prime minister will have any success in negotiating with Donald Trump and getting him
00:07:21.600
to remove some of the tariffs that he has recently imposed. But as of right now, the president is not
00:07:27.500
budget. Alberta Premier Daniel Smith told Ontario Premier Doug Ford to mind his own business when
00:07:36.320
it comes to whether Albertans pursue an independence referendum. Smith held a press conference on
00:07:41.280
Tuesday, a day after she announced plans to send a negotiating team to Ottawa and create the Alberta
00:07:46.620
Next Task Force to assert Alberta's sovereignty. Smith said, quote, I don't tell him how he should run
00:07:51.920
his province, and I would hope that he doesn't tell me how I should run mine. But we have a very
00:07:56.600
respectful relationship, and I hope that continues. Despite telling Ford to butt out, Smith said the
00:08:01.980
two premiers have a, quote, great friendship, although they don't agree on everything. Smith said, quote,
00:08:07.360
in fact, I think we supported different people in the last federal election. The premier was responding
00:08:12.860
to comments Ford made earlier in the day targeted at the independence movement. Ford said on Tuesday,
00:08:18.560
quote, this is a time to unite the country, not people saying, oh, I'm leaving the country.
00:08:23.220
Smith also commented on Alberta's growing separatist movement. She said she would respect any citizen-led
00:08:30.120
referenda, including those pushing for separation. However, Smith explained on Tuesday that she wants
00:08:35.960
to see the number of Albertans supporting the separation decrease, not grow. As of right now,
00:08:41.340
Smith said she expects that slightly more than 30 percent of Albertans would support a separation
00:08:46.180
referendum. Smith fielded media questions after addressing the province yesterday. On Monday,
00:08:51.560
she issued a list of demands to Ottawa in her speech and pledged an Alberta separation referendum
00:08:56.780
in 2026 if the legal threshold is met. While it was initially expected that the referendums could
00:09:02.700
take place at the province's next set of municipal elections in October 2025, Smith said this timeline
00:09:09.100
was unlikely to work out given the 120-day signature collection period. So, Cosmin, a lot of buzz
00:09:15.920
around the Alberta independence movement ever since Mark Carney's Liberals were re-elected.
00:09:20.940
So, how does Smith plan on approaching the issue of separation? What were some of the elements she's
00:09:26.180
hoping will address Alberta's sovereignty and relationship with Ottawa?
00:09:29.900
Yeah, Noah. So, I think Smith is being pretty cautious. Obviously, her main message is that the
00:09:35.180
will of Alberta citizens and Alberta's sovereignty needs to be respected. But yesterday, we saw her
00:09:43.060
address to Albertans where she laid out essentially a two-pronged plan to address the issue of Ottawa
00:09:52.040
disrespecting Ottawa's independence as well as its jurisdiction as a province. So, one of the major
00:09:59.320
things she's proposed is sending a special negotiation team on behalf of Alberta to meet with Ottawa officials,
00:10:08.840
officials from the Liberal minority government, to fight for Alberta's rights and push for what she
00:10:15.420
called a formal Alberta Accord. And that would be a binding agreement, not just, you know, words on paper
00:10:23.360
that both parties signed, but something that Alberta can take away and say that the Ottawa government has
00:10:29.700
legally committed to some of these demands. Now, whether she's actually going to get all of her demands
00:10:37.120
met, that's obviously yet to be seen, and I'm sure Ottawa's going to have their own demands when they go
00:10:42.300
into any future negotiations if that happens. But she's asked for a couple things. So, guaranteed port
00:10:49.100
access for Alberta's oil and gas, repeal of anti-energy federal laws like Bill C-69, oil tanker ban.
00:10:56.680
There was also the electricity regulations, etc. She wants no new export taxes on Alberta resources
00:11:04.140
without approval from her government and fair federal transfers to other provinces. So, these are some of
00:11:12.360
the main concerns that she's outlined in her upcoming negotiations. Then there was also the announcement of
00:11:19.120
the Alberta Next panel, which she would chair, but it would essentially be comprised of the leading
00:11:26.120
experts or minds in Alberta from, you know, judicial sphere, from academia, from all sorts of, you know,
00:11:33.780
business leaders, etc. And they will host town halls with Albertans across the province to collect ideas
00:11:40.240
for potential provincial referendums, including on separation. So, she hasn't left the idea of a
00:11:49.480
separation referendum or an Alberta independence referendum off the table, but it would have to
00:11:55.760
meet that 177,000 signature threshold. And just remember, there was a recall referendum or petition
00:12:06.840
with Calgary Mayor Giotti Gondek, and that failed to get the necessary amount of signatures just for the
00:12:14.740
city. There is a quite a rigorous verification process, because it's one thing to go there and say,
00:12:22.060
I have 177,000 signatures, but all of those signatures, just like votes, need to be identified to make sure
00:12:31.940
that it's actually, first of all, an Albertan signing it, and secondly, that it's a real person, and all of
00:12:39.020
those other concerns you might have when you're conducting a referendum.
00:12:43.700
A motion before the Vancouver City Council wants to ban the sale of gun-shaped lighters and empower
00:12:53.300
police to seize such items proactively in British Columbia. The motion, introduced by Councillor Mike
00:13:00.560
Clausen, highlights an estimated 50 to 75 retailers, particularly in the downtown Eastside and Vancouver's
00:13:08.040
downtown core, that currently sell these novelty lighters. The motion calls on Vancouver City Council
00:13:14.920
to request that Vancouver Mayor Ken Simm call on the provincial government to, quote,
00:13:20.600
prohibit the sale, distribution, and possession of gun-shaped lighters across British Columbia.
00:13:27.580
Additionally, Clausen called on empowering, quote, law enforcement to seize gun-shaped lighters
00:13:33.460
proactively. True North contacted Councillor Clausen for comment and to ask whether such proposed powers
00:13:40.900
may infringe on the property rights of British Columbians but has yet to receive a reply. According
00:13:47.220
to the motion, these items have led to a surge in emergency calls with 46% of incidents occurring in
00:13:53.640
the downtown Eastside and 39% in the downtown area. In 32 documented cases, the responses required
00:14:01.380
dispatching 10 or more officers with each incident averaging 2.5 hours to resolve. Canadian Coalition
00:14:09.120
for Firearm Rights Executive Director Rod Giltaka said the motion was wrongheaded and Vancouver has
00:14:16.080
more pertinent things to worry about. Giltaka told True North, quote, I was born in Vancouver. I've been
00:14:22.560
here virtually my whole life. Over the last 15 years, Vancouver went from one of the greatest cities in
00:14:28.760
North America to a geographically beautiful yet disconnected dystopia. I would wonder if Vancouver city
00:14:35.980
councillors have considered how the prohibition on actual guns has panned out for public safety before
00:14:42.620
focusing in on stylized lighters as the city's problem. There are no current federal, provincial, or municipal
00:14:49.860
laws prohibiting the sale or possession of these lighters unless they are used in the commission of a crime.
00:14:56.260
Klassen argues in his motion, this legal gap leaves law enforcement with limited options to proactively
00:15:03.160
address the issue. I mean, Noah, on my own part, I fail to see how this addresses any root causes of
00:15:12.240
crime. Whether it's a gun-shaped lighter, whether it's a BB gun or any other gun imitation, somebody, if they
00:15:21.160
have the intent to commit a crime, a violent crime, property crime, etc., they're going to use whatever
00:15:27.880
is at their disposal. It could be a knife, it could be a hammer, it could be a machete. I don't think the item
00:15:35.060
addresses that criminal intent or actually causes any change of people or actually
00:15:44.280
or actually convinces anybody who has that intent to not commit a crime otherwise by banning gun-shaped
00:15:52.840
lighters, for example. So, Noah, are there any concerning crime statistics coming out of Vancouver
00:15:59.880
recently? How bad has violent and gun crime in particular become over here?
00:16:06.880
Crime has gotten out of control in Vancouver, like in many cities in Canada, and people can place the
00:16:13.760
blame in multiple different directions. But at the end of the day, I don't think anyone would agree
00:16:19.280
that, yeah, banning gun-shaped lighters is what's really going to lead to a decrease in crime. For example,
00:16:25.760
Vancouver is one of the capital cities in Canada of stranger crimes. The Vancouver Police Department
00:16:33.360
reported that about one to two stranger assaults happen on a daily basis in Vancouver, not a weekly
00:16:41.440
or a monthly basis, on a daily basis. This means that people who are just walking down the streets
00:16:46.560
of Vancouver, going to their job or walking home or going to the grocery store are just viciously
00:16:52.720
assaulted by people out of the blue and sometimes even killed. There was a recent incident of a man
00:17:00.800
in Vancouver's Chinatown, a 92-year-old man who was killed by a stranger. Homicide investigators say
00:17:09.280
that several people partook in this attack and they have not even laid down charges yet for this assault
00:17:16.240
that happened on March 18th. There was another incident where a woman was just walking down the
00:17:22.640
street. A woman who was visiting from Toronto was just walking down along the sea wall and she was
00:17:29.120
attacked by a man three times. She tried running away, she was attacked again and she ran once again and
00:17:36.720
finally she managed to catch the attention of a plainclothes police officer, thank God, but she
00:17:42.960
suffered a broken nose and multiple cuts and bruises. Imagine that is the reputation, that is the experience
00:17:50.000
that someone visiting Vancouver from another part of Canada gets, you know, in their first, second,
00:17:55.040
third time visiting Vancouver. It's not exactly the type of reputation that Vancouver wants to build and
00:18:01.440
really the reputation that they're building is a city that allows violent crime, that allows drug abuse,
00:18:07.600
actually facilitates drug abuse for many addicts and instead is focused on banning gun lighters. For the
00:18:15.360
people of Vancouver who are interested in getting a gun lighter, I would recommend them to go out and get
00:18:22.400
them, you know, because the city is probably going to go out and ban these items and they're pretty
00:18:28.160
harmless. It's just a lighter at the end of the day. If you want to crack down on real guns, maybe you
00:18:34.240
should crack down on the weapons that are flowing across the American border that are ending up in the
00:18:40.560
hands of criminals who are then using those guns to commit crimes. It is not, you know, going after gun
00:18:47.600
lighters that is going to solve this problem. It's not going after BB guns, or hell, it's not going
00:18:52.480
after legal gun owners, people who purchased guns legally and have a gun's license. Going after those
00:18:59.520
people is not going to solve the problem of crime in Vancouver. It is locking up the people who are
00:19:05.120
perpetrating the crimes and to disincentivize these sorts of crimes from ever happening. And I think the
00:19:13.440
Vancouver City Council really is sending the wrong message through this motion.
00:19:22.000
That's it for today, folks. Thanks for tuning in. You can stay on top of new episodes every weekday
00:19:26.800
by subscribing to The Daily Brief on iTunes and Spotify. Also, while you're at it,
00:19:31.360
make sure to hit us with a five-star rating and please leave a review.
Link copied!