Juno News - Trump says he PREFERS the Liberals in Canada

00:00:00.000 I'm Candice Malcolm and this is The Candice Malcolm Show. We have a great episode for you

00:00:09.720 today. I'm very excited to be going through the news with a new guest we've never had on the show

00:00:14.240 before. I'm very pleased today to be joined by Jasmine Lange. Jasmine is a Canadian YouTuber

00:00:19.980 and political commentator from Manitoba. She spent more than a decade broadcasting and is an award

00:00:25.480 winning journalist and now she is with us on the show jasmine thanks so much for being here today

00:00:31.160 thank you so much for the invite my goodness there's been so much juicy news over the last 24

00:00:36.760 hours and i can't wait to get into all of it yeah absolutely okay so we're gonna talk about well

00:00:41.720 well we'll talk about the big news which is that donald trump has i guess endorsed mark carney or

00:00:46.680 so that he at least prefers to deal with liberals in canada the truth finally comes out because

00:00:51.240 there was sort of a lot of questions about why Donald Trump was saying some of the things that

00:00:55.880 he was. He bashed Pierre Polyev for being not a MAGA guy in the past, and so we'll talk about that.

00:01:01.640 We'll also talk about Mark Carney, the latest with his conflict of interest, a little bit of a

00:01:06.680 dispute with the media. It seems like the media is not happy with either political party right now,

00:01:10.840 and we'll get into that, and then we'll have a little bit of analysis on the latest with the

00:01:14.600 trade war but let's start with donald trump on fox news last night so he was on with laura ingram

00:01:21.960 and this was sort of the the big takeaway that was uh going all over social media with

00:01:27.720 donald trump saying that he would rather deal with a liberal than a conservative and that

00:01:33.000 pierre polyev has not been very nice to him that he's been quite negative to him so let's play that

00:01:36.840 clip the liberal party is going to win now in the next election most likely and they were on they

00:01:42.440 They were down tonight.

00:01:44.020 Isn't that going to make them more hostile to us and possibly open the door for China closer to Canada? 1.00

00:01:51.120 And that would really put us in a bind. 0.97

00:01:52.680 The conservative that's running is stupidly no friend of mine. 0.83

00:01:56.500 I don't know him, but he said negative things. 0.98

00:01:58.200 So when he says negative things, I couldn't care less.

00:02:00.780 I think it's easier to deal actually with a liberal.

00:02:04.920 So has Pierre Polyev really said negative things about Donald Trump?

00:02:08.980 I don't know that he has.

00:02:10.080 I think this might be the closest that we that we that we have. Let me just play one more clip.

00:02:13.820 This is Pierre Polyev. I think this might have been the most negative that Polyev has ever gone

00:02:18.200 towards Trump and will let the audience judge for themselves. Let's let's go. This is from March

00:02:22.480 7th. My message to the president is this. Knock it off. Stop the chaos. You are hurting your

00:02:31.260 workers, your consumers and most immediately destroying trillions of dollars of wealth on

00:02:37.960 your own stock market. You're attacking a cherished friend of the United States and you

00:02:45.900 are strengthening America's enemies by going after America's friends.

00:02:52.920 So I see, Jasmine, some criticisms of policies saying that we don't agree with what you're doing,

00:02:58.180 but I don't know that that Pierre Polyev has ever actually said like negative things about Trump.

00:03:03.160 So what do you make of this entire exchange?

00:03:05.600 And do you think it might oddly be good for Pierre Polyev?

00:03:08.700 You know, I'll be honest, I am so torn on this issue

00:03:12.300 because there's been a few comments by Trump that I don't quite understand them.

00:03:17.900 Like even that that initial interview that he had done

00:03:20.720 where there was the audio that leaked or not leaked, it was published,

00:03:23.520 but it was widely shared of him saying, oh, you know, Polyev, he's not a he's not a mega guy.

00:03:28.820 And at first I thought about that and I thought, oh, that's going to be good for Polyev 0.97

00:03:32.220 because unfortunately, Trump derangement syndrome is very strong here in Canada.

00:03:37.160 And the more I looked into it, though, the more I thought, what an odd statement that was to make.

00:03:44.000 And it just seemed weird.

00:03:46.280 And, you know, then this as well, coming after Donald Trump tweeting on Truth Social,

00:03:51.700 I think it was about a week or two ago now, two weeks ago,

00:03:54.520 where he said that he was coming on to the fact that Justin Trudeau and the liberals were using

00:04:02.100 Trump derangement syndrome and the tariffs in order to boost them in the polls. And so

00:04:07.480 then to have this comment again, where he says things about Polyev that don't really make a

00:04:12.680 whole lot of sense. Polyev hasn't said anything harsher about Donald Trump, surely, than that of

00:04:19.220 the liberals, the NDP, the Green, or even any of their supporters. And it just seemed kind of odd.

00:04:25.440 And, you know, do I think it's going to help them in the polls? It's all about that media spin. You know, I've seen some headlines already today where people are saying that this is a good thing for the liberals because it's showing that, oh, see, Donald Trump, he's not going to he's not going to negotiate with Pierre Polyev because he thinks he's mean, but he he would negotiate with with Mark Carney.

00:04:50.200 And to that, I say, does he want to negotiate with Mark Carney or does he think that Mark Carney is weak and the liberals are weak and therefore it'll make his end goal easier?

00:04:59.980 And I truly am. I need to get in contact with some people from Trump's team here to be like, what is happening?

00:05:06.160 I don't know. Are you trying to help them? Are you actually just speaking off the cusp and this is what you think?

00:05:11.500 the whole situation is just so bizarre. Moreover, I'm so disappointed in the landscape of Canadian

00:05:17.500 politics where comments like this from the president in the United States could actually

00:05:23.240 sway voters one way or another. It's like there's so many other things that are unbelievably 0.99

00:05:28.340 important that are actual threats to our democracy, our sovereignty, our happiness

00:05:32.880 that are happening. And nobody's paying attention to those things because somehow Donald Trump has

00:05:38.000 become the driving force of who's to be the next prime minister of the country. And that's so

00:05:42.100 disappointing. Well, it was this black swan and moment in Canadian politics, because two months

00:05:47.220 ago, Pierre Polyev was cruising to a very easy majority government. And, you know, there was no

00:05:52.980 there was no chance that the liberals had had any opportunity to regain the polls with Justin

00:05:58.180 Trudeau. And look at how much things have changed in the last two months because Donald Trump. Like

00:06:03.540 we went from an election where the ballot box question was going to be cost of living

00:06:08.020 and probably carbon taxes to now all that anybody cares about is Donald Trump. So anytime Trump

00:06:13.560 mentions Canada, it is like the biggest story in the country and we have to parse through it and

00:06:18.620 try to understand. I want to play a bit of a longer clip because, you know, the one that I

00:06:22.720 showed earlier of Trump is the one that everyone's talking about and he seems to endorse the liberals

00:06:28.600 presumably because he wants Canada to be weaker, right? So it's almost like a reverse endorsement

00:06:34.920 saying, yeah, Canada, if you want to become the 51st state, if you want to play into Donald Trump's

00:06:39.740 hands, go ahead and vote liberal. And that will basically deliver Canada to Donald Trump. That's

00:06:45.360 kind of what he's saying. And you can see it more in the longer exchange. So Laura Ingram,

00:06:50.140 to her credit, really pushes back against Donald Trump. So she asks him, like, why are you picking

00:06:55.680 on canada he says here's my problem with canada it was meant to be the 51st state and then he talks

00:07:01.120 about lumber how we can build we have our own trees we can build our own automobiles we don't

00:07:05.600 need canada for trade and then laura ingram says but you're tougher on canada than you are on some

00:07:11.280 of our adversaries and trump says only because they're meant to be our 51st state so he's really

00:07:16.720 obsessing over this idea that he wants canada to be the 51st state like it's almost like the more

00:07:22.320 he says it the more he convinces himself that it is a real thing and then laura ingram pushes back 0.77

00:07:27.680 and says but look we need access to their territory canada has a territorial advantage and we don't

00:07:33.200 want them to get too close to canada which is an obvious point from the american perspective it's

00:07:37.760 like if you push canada away you're going to inevitably push them into china's sphere of

00:07:42.560 influence which is really really bad for america considering sort of north american security and

00:07:47.520 then trump starts sort of going off about how canada's nasty and it's all about justin trudeau

00:07:52.960 it's all about how he dislikes justin he dislikes the way that trudeau's team handled the negotiations

00:07:58.880 last time around which i think is all very valid concerns i thought that yeah the government were

00:08:03.120 incredibly disrespectful and counterproductive in their messaging like they cared so much more

00:08:08.240 about bashing the americans and bashing trump to their canadian audience at the time in 2017-18

00:08:14.160 negotiating nafta than they did about making a deal with our neighbor and our close and then

00:08:20.960 laura and laura ingram and donald trump get into a back and forth about the trade deficit because

00:08:24.640 trump repeats 200 billion dollars 200 billion dollars and i don't know where he gets that

00:08:29.520 number from and laura ingram saying it's not 200 billion it's 60 billion so let's at least

00:08:33.520 you know use the correct number and then he goes back and forth and then trump starts talking about

00:08:37.040 how he loves canada and that's when we get it up so we put together a little montage so you can

00:08:41.200 sort of see the back and forth this is a little bit of a longer clip that we usually play on the

00:08:45.680 show it's about a minute and a half but i think it's worthwhile to show so let's play that clip

00:08:49.440 here's my problem with canada canada was meant to be the 51st state because we subsidize canada by

00:08:56.960 200 billion dollars a year we don't need their cars we don't need their lumber whatever you're

00:09:02.960 tougher with canada than you are with some only because our biggest adversaries only because it's

00:09:07.440 It's meant to be our 51st street.

00:09:09.220 OK, but no, no, but listen to this for a second.

00:09:11.560 We need their territory.

00:09:12.480 They have territorial advantage.

00:09:13.860 We're not going to let them get close to China. 0.96

00:09:16.120 Look, I deal with every country indirectly or directly. 0.79

00:09:19.720 One of the nastiest countries to deal with is Canada.

00:09:23.100 The people that now this was Trudeau, the people that that good old Justin, I call him 0.92

00:09:28.560 Governor Trudeau.

00:09:30.720 He was his people were nasty and they weren't telling the truth. 1.00

00:09:35.760 They never told the truth.

00:09:36.640 And if you look at dairy products, what they've done to our farmers, do you know that Canada has a 250 percent tariff?

00:09:43.740 250. Nobody knows that. They charge us numbers that are crazy.

00:09:48.220 But we have a very big deficit with Canada. And there's no reason much more.

00:09:53.260 We have much more than you say 60 and I say 200. But it doesn't matter.

00:09:57.500 So your end game is what with them? My end game is I don't want to have a big deficit.

00:10:01.720 I don't want us to pay 60 or 200 billion dollars to a country that if they were a state, it would be cherished.

00:10:09.940 And then he goes on about how he loves Canada and he thinks it should be a state.

00:10:13.560 And so she's asked, like, what is your end game? And he says it's to end the deficit.

00:10:17.900 So the fact that he is endorsing the liberals and saying, I prefer to deal with the liberals because Pierre hasn't been nice to me.

00:10:23.060 Again, that's saying that he wants Canada to be weaker so that he can get a better deal to either get rid of that trade surplus or trade deficit for the United States or make Canada the 51st state. So again, I don't think that this is in any way can be twisted as being good for the liberals.

00:10:40.000 oh but they're doing it anyway exactly exactly except for the fact that the media will always

00:10:44.240 be there to push trump arrangement syndrome and to say that you know well somehow that

00:10:51.240 mark carney is possibly the best one to deal with president trump what do you make of it all jasmine

00:10:56.520 you know i again it's just that feeling of disappointment more than anything and and to me

00:11:02.520 you know not to be too unprofessional but there's that whole like fafo saying that goes around and

00:11:08.880 I feel like the liberals have been seeing some of that right now. You know, you had the Trudeau

00:11:13.840 government who, quite honestly, it's bizarre to me, all of these conversations about, oh,

00:11:19.100 our democracy, our sovereignty. Meanwhile, I'm like, you completely disrespected the democratic

00:11:24.700 right of the American people, of the president of the United States during the period of time

00:11:29.740 that he was no longer president. You never thought that he was going to win again. And so you used

00:11:35.940 that opportunity over the last number of years to smear him and make these illogical comparisons

00:11:41.560 of Canada's conservatives, which by all accounts are not even remotely close to Republicans.

00:11:49.120 And you use that opportunity to create this fear in your nation that simply doesn't exist. There's

00:11:55.040 no real reason why any of it needs to exist that I've been able to find thus far. And you didn't

00:12:00.420 think he was going to win. And guess what? He did. And that's probably why Trudeau's on stage

00:12:05.280 almost tearing up. It wasn't supposed to be like this. America had their chance to vote their first

00:12:11.200 women, blah, blah, blah, as he proceeds to then go and crown Mark Carney as the Supreme Leader

00:12:16.320 of Canada. But, you know, the whole situation, I think, has just been so overblown. It's so

00:12:22.820 illogical. And it's just unbelievable and deeply concerning as well, the narratives being crafted

00:12:28.900 from it all. And I do believe personally that I think that that I don't know that that was

00:12:34.800 necessarily an endorsement, but it kind of was at the same time. But I think moreover, the biggest

00:12:41.880 picture here is, okay, well, Donald Trump is saying that he wants to annex Canada, essentially.

00:12:47.120 That's the language, right, that people are putting out there. And he's saying that him

00:12:52.640 getting what he wants will be easier to achieve under a liberal government. Oh, the conservatives

00:12:57.980 haven't been very nice to me. And that's just a bizarre comment to make to begin with. And so I

00:13:04.100 think the bigger picture that people need to focus on here is, okay, well, listen, if you don't like

00:13:09.580 Donald Trump, well, you should probably like Pierre Polyev and the conservatives then because

00:13:14.540 apparently Donald Trump doesn't view them as somebody who he can just stomp all over. He views

00:13:21.400 them as somebody with a bit more of a spine. But of course, you have the mainstream media not at

00:13:27.240 all portraying that message. And instead, I've seen so many bizarre takes on this story since

00:13:31.820 it since it broke of people who are using it as oh see this is why team carney i'm like what is

00:13:37.420 happening in this country i don't understand what is wrong with the minds of some people who cannot

00:13:42.700 see this bigger picture well it's one of those things that had it been reversed so say donald

00:13:47.820 trump had come out and said i don't like the liberals i prefer conservatives i want the

00:13:51.580 conservatives to win then the media would have spun that as if you imagine is a mega and and

00:13:56.940 the reason that they want is because they want to turn north america into like the hands-made

00:14:01.020 detail or something. And so it's like either way, whatever Trump says, the media and the

00:14:06.860 Liberal Party will go into like complete spin mode to use that to promote Mark Carney and to

00:14:11.940 criticize Pierre Polyev. But then I have seen a lot of criticism of Pierre Polyev on the political

00:14:17.080 right as well. We've talked about this before on the show that people wish that he had made a message

00:14:22.160 that was just different than the Liberals. Like right now, when it comes to Trump and trade,

00:14:26.760 There's not much daylight between the Liberals and the Conservatives, even with the retaliatory

00:14:31.560 tariffs that both parties agree that we need to implement.

00:14:35.500 I personally think that tariffs are a terrible idea and a much better approach would have

00:14:39.380 been to try to negotiate with Trump and to try to say, look, Donald Trump is raising

00:14:43.260 some very valid points.

00:14:45.040 We need to crack down on our fentanyl industry.

00:14:47.620 We need to secure our border.

00:14:48.960 We need to fix mass immigration. 1.00

00:14:50.380 We need to fix illegal immigration. 1.00

00:14:52.160 Let's use this as an opportunity to make Canada better and fix so many of the mistakes

00:14:55.360 that dustin trudeau made over the last decade instead we kind of have this who's going to say

00:14:59.920 who's going to be the bigger you know who's going to push back against donald trump more

00:15:04.240 and who's going to dump their chest harder and wrap themselves in the canadian flag

00:15:07.760 more and so we saw more of that from pier poliev so in response to trump's comment this morning

00:15:13.520 poliev went on to x and he wrote the following he said last night president donald trump endorsed

00:15:18.320 mark carney why because as trump said he's easier to deal with and knows that i will be a tough

00:15:24.000 negotiator and always put canada first carney is weak and would cave to trump's demands just like

00:15:29.200 he did when he moved his company headquarter from canada to new york city canadians don't want a

00:15:33.840 weak and conflicted leader they want a strong prime minister who will put canada first pierre

00:15:39.280 polyev was speaking at a press conference in sudbury ontario and he basically just said the

00:15:44.160 same thing i won't play the clips but he basically just repeated um that message so jasmine do you

00:15:48.960 you think that that is a appropriate response and do you think it will help peer poly of

00:15:53.200 well i personally enjoyed the response um but having said that i do think a lot of people are

00:15:58.480 tired of hearing about some of the same talking points when it comes to mark carney do i think

00:16:03.520 it will help him not particularly i've i have been feeling um i just don't i don't know that

00:16:10.720 the response i assumed the conservative party would have to all of this has certainly not been

00:16:15.360 met i it's bizarre to me and i understand of course we have this canada first we have this

00:16:21.040 this unbelievable trump derangement syndrome that's the best way to describe it where

00:16:26.400 as a party leader it really does appear that donald trump is going to be the winning ballot

00:16:31.600 question really um which is really unfortunate and there are so many other things that

00:16:37.840 conservatives traditionally would do that they just haven't they have kind of just mimicked a

00:16:42.960 lot of the same talking points and it's bizarre to me that no party at all has said we're going

00:16:49.920 to work with donald trump to make sure that we maintain all of this rather the conversation is

00:16:56.320 is about oh well you know we're gonna we're gonna keep doing all the same stuff that we're doing

00:17:01.360 um and we're just we're gonna ask you know donald trump to to not say those things anymore because

00:17:07.120 it's not true it's just it is i don't know the response back from all parties has has felt very

00:17:13.520 weak to me and not productive it really it's just the longest story of all time at this point the

00:17:20.800 fact that we here we are how many months later since we first got got word of this and the same

00:17:27.040 the same things are being said from both parties is beyond me like somebody needs to actually

00:17:31.840 come to the table finally and say, yeah, we're not going to tax our citizens even more. How many

00:17:38.260 reports have we heard of other industries as well coming out saying that the Trump tariffs will hurt,

00:17:43.340 but the Canadian tariffs are going to hurt them so much more in terms of their industry. And it's

00:17:49.640 a tough spot to be in. I understand that politically. But also, I think it's really

00:17:54.580 important to recognize the bigger picture here. And you're never going to win this by just

00:17:59.060 reiterating the same things and, oh, we're just going to tear a few back. That's silly. We need 0.93

00:18:03.180 to actually come to the table. And what do you want, Mr. Trump? Here's what we want. Okay,

00:18:09.940 let's get some of those negotiations going. Because I don't know why some people may call

00:18:15.280 me silly, but I still have quite a hard time believing that this is actually about Donald

00:18:20.180 Trump wanting to annex Canada. There is no way Donald Trump would want even more Democrats 0.89

00:18:26.220 in the United States. Well, exactly. I mean, I like I tend to think that at first he said it as

00:18:32.920 a joke. And then the more he said it, the more he started to convince himself that it's true that

00:18:37.060 Canada, you know, we rely entirely on American trade and American defense. And so if we don't

00:18:43.420 have like our own market that we can survive without American trade and we can't defend 0.91

00:18:48.640 ourselves and Canadian politics is built upon everybody bashing the Americans and the smug

00:18:54.540 anti-Americanism that exists mostly in Laurentian Canada, but certainly among the elites in politics

00:19:00.660 and the media. And it's like, why would they put up with that? And it is interesting to see. Now,

00:19:05.920 I want to shift gears a little bit here, Desmond, and talk about Mark Carney, because he was in

00:19:09.280 Europe. And it was a little strange, right? He becomes prime minister over the weekend. He gets

00:19:13.700 sworn in on Friday. And the very first thing he does is head to Europe, which is not something

00:19:18.140 a Canadian prime minister would typically do, right? The Americans are our closest and most

00:19:22.260 important ally and partner and we're having a dispute with them, you would think he would go

00:19:26.240 down to Washington or even better, you would think he would just stay in Canada. Like he just became

00:19:29.860 prime minister and you'd think he'd like go and do events in his own country. But instead he jets

00:19:34.120 off to Europe and we covered this extensively on the show yesterday, but I just want to

00:19:38.120 reiterate a few points. So I think that Mark Carney did this because he wanted to appear like

00:19:43.920 he was shifting away from the Americans and say, look, I can rely on all of my old alliances and

00:19:49.280 friendships, when I was the governor of the Bank of England, and when I was a chairman of the World

00:19:53.440 Economic Forum, and when I was a special envoy to the United Nations, look at my fancy elite

00:19:57.860 globalist friends. I'm going to go over there and sort of flex my globalist muscles. And he said,

00:20:04.340 actually, interestingly, he said that we don't need another country to validate our sovereignty.

00:20:09.080 So presumably a dig on the Americans. I think he wanted to shift focus to Europe. But the only

00:20:13.720 problem is that the Europeans didn't want any of it. They weren't having any of it. And so Mark

00:20:18.300 Kearney, first he lands in Paris, France to meet with Emmanuel Macron. Macron couldn't be bothered

00:20:24.160 to go meet him at the airport. So instead, he's met by some deputy of the National Assembly,

00:20:29.160 like a lower level political person, which I think was a snub. And it was embarrassing to

00:20:34.100 Kearney because it showed that, you know, the president of France couldn't even be bothered

00:20:37.760 to go meet him. And then he moves on and he goes to England and he meets with King Charles. He meets

00:20:45.700 with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, but Keir Starmer refuses to do a joint press conference

00:20:50.720 with him. He refuses, Keir Starmer refuses to take any questions. And the way that the British 1.00

00:20:54.880 press were reporting it was because Keir Starmer is dealing with his own sort of feud with the

00:21:00.160 Americans. And I think he thought that appearing with Mark Carney would make him look bad in front

00:21:05.440 of the Americans. And so he was like trying to distance himself from Mark Carney. So I'm going

00:21:09.120 to play a clip. This is from Sky News reporting in the UK, explaining Mark Carney's visit and why

00:21:14.500 the UK basically just didn't want to have a public event with him. Let's show that clip.

00:21:19.860 Mark Carney, Canada's new prime minister back in London, strengthening old alliances as his

00:21:25.040 country comes under sustained economic and political attack from its American neighbour.

00:21:34.660 He was looking for firm support from his British counterpart.

00:21:38.760 we're at a point in history where the world is being reordered and your leadership the leadership

00:21:46.040 of the uk i think can be decisive there were warm words from starmer the relationship between our

00:21:52.840 two countries has always been strong to sovereign allies so much in common but no joint press

00:22:01.320 conference the british prime minister wasn't taking questions he has our own relationship

00:22:07.080 with the U.S. to think about? So Mark Carney is sort of a liability and he wasn't met with open

00:22:13.200 arms. He wasn't able to negotiate any kind of deal in Europe. So he left Europe empty-handed with no

00:22:18.580 trade deal, no new relationship, nothing to show for himself. And the only thing that did happen

00:22:25.020 was he had that embarrassing feud with his own doting press, like the people who were on his

00:22:30.980 side, like Rosemary Barton of the CBC, you know, speaking very condescendingly to them and sort of

00:22:37.040 unnecessarily picking a fight with him. So from my perspective, Mark Carney's entire trip to

00:22:41.720 London, to England was a total disaster. He came home empty handed. And that that is really a story

00:22:48.020 that our prime minister wasn't able to deliver on anything. You know, he went to Europe. Yeah,

00:22:53.940 he went to Europe to try to show that we don't need Americans. And he came back with basically 0.86

00:22:58.240 the idea that we actually do need the Americans because nobody else wants to be our partner.

00:23:03.020 what do you think of all that? I have so many thoughts about that and things that I'm

00:23:08.000 potentially nitpicking just a little bit too much. But I think in general, of course, it is important

00:23:13.480 for a new leader to go and meet all of your allies around the world, obviously. The fact that it was

00:23:21.020 Europe and it wasn't, I don't know, maybe China to help with the 100% tariffs that the media is

00:23:27.640 simply just not outraged about at all that is going to absolutely wipe out a lot of industry

00:23:32.900 in the prairies, especially. That's bizarre. It's bizarre that it wasn't with the U.S. I think

00:23:38.100 I think overall, I don't think that Donald Trump would take Mark Carney seriously at this point

00:23:42.440 until he wins a federal election. So perhaps that could have something to do with it as well.

00:23:48.300 The one thing that I will say, and this is me potentially just nitpicking a little much,

00:23:54.120 is the fact that, you know, you have Donald Trump who has been going after everybody. It's not just

00:24:00.480 Canada. It's far from just Canada. And one thing that Donald Trump has been very, very particular

00:24:05.960 about has been to remove the elites, the globalist initiatives and agendas out of America. And in

00:24:14.760 that same timeframe, you have Mark Carney, who is elected, who certainly if you do some research,

00:24:20.140 you can put some pieces together there and then you also have the leaders in both france and the

00:24:25.260 uk who are all a part of the same types of organizations and it's really fascinating to me

00:24:31.100 and perhaps this is just something more to think about that our prime minister mark carney rather

00:24:37.820 than going to mend relationships with something that's going to hurt our economy even more he

00:24:43.500 he decided to go and, I don't know, hang out with, I guess, for a few days, some other leaders whose

00:24:50.540 countries economically and culturally are very much in the same disaster that ours are. And,

00:24:57.560 you know, they say, oh, we're going to change things. Well, it doesn't sound like you are

00:25:01.600 actually. And here we are again, you go, you go down and of course, you know, cool. He used to

00:25:06.460 live there. He's already, he knows King Charles. He used to be in their, their box over at Wimbledon.

00:25:13.500 And so it's just interesting to me that he goes there and you don't have a single country coming to Canada's defense publicly at all.

00:25:22.860 And then on top of that, I feel like it almost just further drives the wedge in between Canada and the USA.

00:25:31.340 And I don't understand what the purpose was.

00:25:33.480 I think it was a massive waste of dollars.

00:25:35.360 not to mention the fact that Justin Trudeau and Melanie Jolie were both in those exact same

00:25:40.420 regions weeks ago discussing the exact same things. So what was the point? Exactly what was

00:25:47.940 the point other than he came home empty-handed like if he had accomplished something you know

00:25:51.140 the media would be praising singing his praises and talking about how wonderful he is but he came

00:25:55.860 back I want to read from Dan Knight who is a writer and we've had him on the show before

00:26:00.100 he wrote this on Substack he wrote that Mark Carney's European delegation was a total disaster

00:26:05.040 came back with no trade deals, no answers on his financial conflicts, which we'll get to later in

00:26:09.460 the show, and no real plan on Trump's tariffs, just more lies, gaslighting, and excuses. And

00:26:16.900 one of the things that Dan highlights in that piece, Jasmine, is this exchange where Mark Carney

00:26:23.180 is talking about how we don't need another country to validate our sovereignty. So why would he say

00:26:28.940 that? Like, obviously, that's the case. But I think the idea was that he was looking for another

00:26:34.440 country to validate our sovereignty. He was hoping that the UK and France would validate

00:26:38.940 our sovereignty, but instead they don't want anything to do with us under Mark Carney because

00:26:42.600 maybe they see him as an illegitimate leader. He hasn't been elected by the people. He has no

00:26:46.300 business leading the country. We should have a general election, but he's too afraid to.

00:26:51.180 So let's quickly play this clip of Mark Carney saying we don't need another country to validate

00:26:56.220 our sovereignty. We don't need another country to validate our sovereignty. We are sovereign.

00:27:02.140 We can diversify our trading relationships, we can build new trading corridors, and we can fully realize what Canada is, which is an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy. And that's exactly what we're going to do.

00:27:15.820 I mean, if that's the case, you don't actually have to say it, right?

00:27:18.640 I was just thinking that. Yeah, I was just thinking that like if that was the case and these tariffs, yeah, sure, they're going to suck for some industries in particular. But if that was the case, you wouldn't have to say every sentence over the last number of months now with that being an opening line. It's just so silly to me. And, you know, for him, oh, we are so rich in our resources and energy and blah, blah. No, we are not because you have you have intentionally put so many measures

00:27:48.520 in place to ensure that we don't have access to those things at all and then oh yeah we're you

00:27:55.560 know even this too he goes on all the time oh yeah we're gonna build pipelines he says it in

00:27:59.720 english not in french he did that again just two days ago if i'm not mistaken and then you put

00:28:04.520 steven guibo as the the leader of quebec essentially not actually but i don't remember what the actual

00:28:10.760 title was um but then you put him there and it's like okay great so i guess we're just never getting

00:28:15.560 pipelines, I suppose. And it's just the entire response to this situation has been nothing but

00:28:22.080 weakness. And I fault all parties for that. Because if this wasn't an issue, if you were a

00:28:27.460 very strong country that was very united, you weren't in a post-national state where you had

00:28:33.540 increasing unemployment rates, increasing homelessness rates, and all of these awful

00:28:38.700 things that are just destroying our society. If you really were what you claim to be,

00:28:43.960 the moment that Donald Trump would have said that it would have been met with a laugh and you would 1.00

00:28:48.340 have just like what a stupid thing to say and you would have never given it attention and do you 0.99

00:28:52.060 want to know what would have happened if you never gave it attention I'm willing to bet Donald Trump 0.99

00:28:55.980 likely still wouldn't be saying that but you gave it so much attention you ran on it and that's why

00:29:01.460 the situation has gotten so much worse because you're you're using that almost for political

00:29:05.100 points and unfortunately it's working well you're right and just even the idea like I think that

00:29:11.580 Mark Carney really has benefited from Donald Trump. He should be sending flowers to Donald

00:29:16.780 Trump, thanking him for making Trump the biggest issue in the campaign, because then it allows

00:29:21.960 Mark Carney to come back on this. Like I'm a trusted hand. Look at what I've done for the

00:29:25.280 economy. Of course, when we look into those claims, they're not entirely true. Like he claimed

00:29:29.540 that he helped Paul Martin balance the budget. And so he was a university student when Paul

00:29:34.300 Martin balanced the budget and he didn't live in Canada. He became a banker for Goldman Sachs

00:29:37.980 between Hong Kong, Tokyo, and New York.

00:29:40.620 So he wasn't even around at all

00:29:42.600 when the budgets were balanced.

00:29:44.160 He claimed that he helped balance the budget

00:29:46.100 and steer the ship for the Harper government

00:29:48.440 in 2008 financial crisis.

00:29:50.140 And Harper came out and said, 1.00

00:29:51.060 actually, that wasn't you at all.

00:29:52.300 That was Jim Flaherty,

00:29:53.140 the late Jim Flaherty, the finance minister.

00:29:55.060 And so he tends to like over-inflate his role.

00:29:58.380 And the sad thing is that too many Canadians 1.00

00:30:00.540 are falling for it.

00:30:02.640 But Jasmine, I think the reality is that

00:30:04.200 Mark Carney's just not very good at this.

00:30:05.980 like no i think that people have this idea of mark carney well first of all i i would guess

00:30:10.780 that fewer than like 25 of canadians even knows who mark carney is like i don't think that the

00:30:16.860 average canadian could tell you who the prime minister is at this point in time mark carney was

00:30:21.740 a like a civil servant to backroom operative an economic advisor and a globalist banker he didn't

00:30:29.020 necessarily have the highest profile but the people in the know like the elites in the media

00:30:33.900 they all know mark carney really well and they all love mark carney but the more that we see

00:30:37.980 of mark carney the more we realize that he doesn't have a lot of experience in this

00:30:41.980 his temperament isn't necessarily very good for this he kind of has this like very condescending

00:30:48.620 talking down to you i know better than you i'm smarter than you and how dare you question me

00:30:53.740 and this really came out in the exchange with the legacy media in london on monday i played this

00:30:59.420 clip i think it's worth playing it again um oh sorry this was this was yeah interacting with

00:31:05.500 the press um so we just put together a short little montage to refresh everybody's memory

00:31:10.060 of how mark carney was dealing with a press who want nothing more than to praise him and love him

00:31:15.500 right they they you know they're interested in the conflict of interest because canadians are

00:31:20.060 they would never touch any of the deeper social questions that we have about mark carney or any

00:31:24.780 of the bigger controversies surrounding his his time in the uk they you know this is like pretty

00:31:30.380 kid glove level stuff like tell us about your money and where it's investing and whether it's

00:31:34.700 going to be a conflict and even that he can't handle the pressure and i think that's what this

00:31:38.780 clip really shows so play the clip and then we'll react to it with canadians not being aware of what

00:31:44.620 potential conflicts of interest what possible conflict would you have um stephanie stephanie

00:31:49.100 I'm complying with the rules. I'm complying with the rules in advance.

00:31:53.700 Point of view.

00:31:55.080 That's very difficult to believe.

00:31:58.720 Look inside yourself, Rosemary.

00:32:00.920 I mean, you start from a prior of conflict and ill will.

00:32:11.920 I have served in the private sector.

00:32:14.600 I'm complying with all the rules.

00:32:16.400 your line of questioning is trying to invent new rules

00:32:20.720 so to me all that speaks to is just i mean his character and like a total inability to have

00:32:28.220 like anyone question him and his authority and you know total like being thin-skinned as well

00:32:34.120 being not a very good politician and obviously trying to evade something like he doesn't want

00:32:38.320 people to know where his money is invested and he won't just kind of come clean and say

00:32:42.260 yes the ethics commissioner rules say 120 days but given the special circumstances that i was

00:32:46.640 just selected by my party to be the interim prime minister which in canada just means the prime

00:32:50.540 minister and i haven't been democratically elected and we're about to go into a campaign and

00:32:54.600 canadians deserve to know where all my millions and millions of dollars are invested here here it

00:33:00.100 is like just you know as a sign of goodwill here it is he doesn't want to do that and so he's he's

00:33:05.960 playing on these technicalities but again i just think it really shows a lack of character here

00:33:10.920 What do you what do you think, Jasmine? I was so appalled by how a lot of that went. The look

00:33:17.280 inside yourself like, whoa. And also, too, you know, you have to keep in mind that throughout

00:33:22.080 that entire press conference that he had done and the questions that followed, the amount of times

00:33:26.660 that he said something disparaging about Pierre Polyev, about Donald Trump. And it was definitely 0.99

00:33:30.960 within with ill will. And you were trying to craft something that that didn't necessarily need to be

00:33:36.780 there. So I always just think that's funny when somebody does something and then and then responds

00:33:40.780 very differently when they assume it's being done to them. But, you know, for people to want,

00:33:46.080 I understand, sure, it's been a little bit of a big talking point, and I think rightfully so. 1.00

00:33:50.440 I think it's pretty bizarre. And while the ethics commissioner, they have up to 120 days to release

00:33:55.940 their report and make it public information, it could absolutely happen in the next 20 days. We

00:34:00.460 don't know. That's the maximum timeframe that it takes. But I think it's rather fascinating to have

00:34:06.840 Mark Carney, who has gone up on stage several times now and discussed net zero. He has discussed

00:34:11.760 carbon credits. He has discussed central banking, digital banking. These are all things that Mark

00:34:19.020 Carney, as far back as 2015, if I'm not mistaken, has been advocating for. Many of these things he

00:34:25.300 has actually designed how they would roll out. And he has unofficially lobbied governments to

00:34:32.040 to impose certain measures about these very things. And so it's bizarre to me to have him say

00:34:37.040 what possible conflicts of interest could there be while in the same breath also discussing these

00:34:42.660 programs, initiatives, ideologies that he's very much involved in, that his investments

00:34:46.500 have have very much been tied to, that have made him achieve more wealth in a few short years,

00:34:52.660 really, than any Canadian households will see in their entire lifetime. So I think it's a very fair

00:34:57.700 question to ask. And, you know, of course, we won't know the answer of that. And even when the

00:35:02.520 ethics commissioner comes out, it's not like we're going to have this full, complete list of all of

00:35:06.880 the pieces that are tied together. There will be a lot of information in there that you'll be able

00:35:12.260 to see, knowing of certain conflicts of interest, at least. But it's just really bizarre to me. And

00:35:18.720 I don't mean to say, oh, well, because you're being silent about it, that means that you're

00:35:22.100 hiding something. I'm saying that I'm assuming that you're probably hiding something based on

00:35:29.640 your past and based on your past involvement with multiple governments, most notably,

00:35:35.980 obviously, the liberal government with Justin Trudeau. That's why people think that you're

00:35:40.100 hiding something. And when you respond like that, if it was really so easy to say,

00:35:44.100 you would think that just in order to take that talking point away from the conservatives,

00:35:48.100 he would just say it well exactly and i mean he you kind of danced around it but like he does

00:35:54.560 have a financial stake potentially in imposing these regulations and ensuring that some of these

00:36:00.580 green schemes go back to other things that he's been on the board of and investing in so like

00:36:05.120 this idea that he has come in he's our prime minister he was obviously coronated long before

00:36:10.120 the liberal party vote voted for him it was decided that he was going to be the leader he was placed in

00:36:15.400 this position, anyone who posed a real threat to him, the Liberal Party found a way to disqualify

00:36:19.860 them. They had 400,000 members that were registered to vote, and only 150,000 of them

00:36:27.020 actually voted. So just like so many questions around how this guy was put into power.

00:36:32.220 And you're wondering, like, why would anyone want to take the job when the Liberal Party

00:36:35.140 was so down and out? There must be some reason why someone convinced him, hey, go be Prime

00:36:40.740 Minister, what is it? Is it to do with finances? And I think this is interesting, because even

00:36:45.180 legacy media which i've said and i'll say it again they want mark kearney to win they love mark

00:36:49.820 kearney they respect him they think he's wonderful they think he's like a really nice guy they talk

00:36:54.940 glowingly about him and they don't have a problem with any of the way that he's been installed they

00:36:59.420 don't have a problem with proroguing a parliament or anything like that the reason that they're

00:37:03.420 asking those questions is because it's so blatantly obvious that there could be a conflict of interest

00:37:08.540 and that this is not how it's done in canada that even the press who would in in any other

00:37:13.660 circumstance do anything to defend Mark Carney, to shield Mark Carney from difficult questions,

00:37:18.380 to shield him from even answering questions that Canadians deserve to know, like, where he stands

00:37:23.020 on divisive social issues. They don't want to ask him anything about that. What they do want to ask

00:37:29.040 about is this, and he can't even take it, which to me, again, it's just like really, really eye

00:37:35.160 opening. And I think that he obviously has to answer for it, and the Conservatives are making

00:37:42.640 a big deal about this as well. So we reported this over at Juno News, that the Conservatives

00:37:47.760 demand that Mark Kearney reveal his Brookfield stock options. And so one of the things that we

00:37:53.280 learned is that he got a multi-million dollar stock option deal. So Jasmine, even if he puts

00:37:58.580 his money into a blind trust, he knows that he has a lot of money in Brookfield. And there was

00:38:05.880 a report that just came out as we're coming on air that shows that while he was chair of Brookfield,

00:38:09.780 the company's assets increased uh by like 20 or something like that whereas in canada they

00:38:16.100 actually decreased so so the canada they lost jobs obviously they moved their headquarters

00:38:20.160 out of canada even though it's a canadian company it's now majority of its assets are in the u.s

00:38:25.620 and american companies which goes to show like even a canadian asset management company doesn't

00:38:29.200 want to invest in canada because of these liberal policies but i think that this is a bigger issue

00:38:35.240 know it's a bit complicated and maybe it's not you know really easy for canadians to understand but

00:38:40.440 the more you kind of look into his finances and the way it's structured and this wine trust and

00:38:44.520 his refusal and him saying what possible conflicts could i have and now coming out um admitting that

00:38:49.720 he could have conflicts and that he's going to allow the ethics uh commissioner to create a

00:38:54.120 screen this was reported in the national post you can see there carney admits to potential conflicts

00:38:58.120 of interest with brookfield after saying like 24 hours earlier like what possible conflict um could

00:39:03.800 I have in fading outrage. I, you know, I think that, that it is shown that there is a problem

00:39:08.840 here that even the media can't ignore. What do you think? I think the fact that you have legacy

00:39:13.720 media commenting on it is a very big signal that obviously there is something too big to ignore.

00:39:19.960 And, you know, conflicts of interest, they arise all the time with various politicians. It's not

00:39:25.080 like this is anything new. The amount of money that he has, it's not like that is anything new.

00:39:30.040 you know, it doesn't really, at the end of the day, it's annoying to me because obviously

00:39:34.240 you're being touted as an outsider who is, I've been around the world. I know what to do. I know

00:39:39.960 what Canadians want. I'm like, you haven't even lived here in 10 years up until January when you

00:39:43.940 bought a property. But okay. Like, I just think overall, you know, he's so unbelievably

00:39:49.680 unrelatable and it's bizarre the shielding that's happening. And the fact that finally you have some

00:39:56.000 people saying that something here isn't right and we're going to start calling you out on it and to

00:40:00.800 have him react in such a way is just bizarre to me um and also you know more than that it's been

00:40:07.680 shocking to see the left eat itself alive right now and the amount of people who have been coming

00:40:13.760 after uh rosemary barton for her her follow-up question oh she was so disrespectful how is she 1.00

00:40:19.360 so disrespectful for saying what she said like like that sounds like good journalism actually

00:40:25.360 thank goodness, maybe we can get back to more of that because that's how it should be. You're

00:40:28.800 supposed to press and get answers rather than shield people. But I do think that Mark Carney

00:40:34.360 has a very lengthy rap sheet. He has obviously been involved in influencing policy. He has

00:40:39.800 discussed that as well. On the world stage at various conferences, there's clips of him

00:40:45.100 discussing his influence and policy. And while, yes, he's in a blind trust, you know, that doesn't

00:40:51.380 mean that all of his assets and investments are no longer there he still knows exactly what all

00:40:57.620 of them are it's good if there's some screens put in place we don't know how long they'll be put in

00:41:02.180 place for but at the end of the day you know the longer that he keeps talking about climate policy

00:41:08.580 um you can guarantee that there's something of his that is probably benefiting from that that's how

00:41:13.460 he has made all of his money well isn't it interesting that people were going after rosemary

00:41:17.860 Barton, right? Because presumably a journalist's job is actually to hold a politician accountable,

00:41:22.020 but everybody knows the real deal here, that the CBC is the beneficiary of a liberal government

00:41:28.020 because it was Justin Trudeau over and over again, every time there's an election, promising more

00:41:32.020 money to the CBC, promising newspaper bailouts to Canada's failing newspapers. And so these

00:41:38.240 companies, including the CBC, primarily the CBC, but also all the other newspapers now,

00:41:42.760 are funded by the liberals, and therefore it is expected that they will tow the party line

00:41:47.340 and push for liberals.

00:41:49.860 And so when they don't, liberals get very upset.

00:41:52.100 And they're like, well, wait a minute, we pay you. 0.58

00:41:54.580 So you better damn well do what we say,

00:41:56.860 fall in line, Rosemary Barton. 0.93

00:41:58.440 Rosemary Barton pretending to be an independent journalist

00:42:00.360 and saying, I can ask whatever I want,

00:42:02.220 but that's not true.

00:42:03.140 That's not true.

00:42:03.780 And I know that she will fall in line.

00:42:05.140 She won't be pushing back at Mark Carney like that.

00:42:07.700 Again, I'm sure she got a stern talking to from her boss

00:42:10.300 and from liberal press secretaries

00:42:12.660 that we know call up members of the press all the time

00:42:16.080 and yell at them if they ask questions or if they write headlines that the Liberals don't approve

00:42:21.300 of. We've been reporting on that for years at True North and Juneau News. That's how Ottawa works.

00:42:26.480 And I just want to throw in one more story into the mix here, Jasmine, which is that in the middle

00:42:31.480 of all this, Pierre Polyev announced that the Conservative Party will not invite members of

00:42:38.240 legacy media onto the campaign plane and campaign bus during the upcoming election. So it's widely

00:42:43.840 rumored that we are going to be heading into an election as soon as this weekend. And so everybody's

00:42:48.980 getting ready. All the campaigns are getting ready. People are gearing up. And in the midst of that,

00:42:53.640 we got an email that was sent to the media from Jenny Byrne. Jenny Byrne is the national campaign

00:42:58.660 manager for the Conservative Party. And she basically just says, well, read from it, says,

00:43:03.640 hello, I'm writing to you today to update you on the plan for the Conservative Party campaign.

00:43:08.040 We want to first stress that we'll be running a campaign that ensures strong, fair and equitable

00:43:11.820 media access, as you're aware, costs for travel have risen considerably. At the same time,

00:43:16.420 so is the capacity for digital and remote access to public events. And then she just goes on to

00:43:21.080 say that there will not be a media contingent on a conservative bus or plane, though we welcome

00:43:28.800 and encourage participation at all public events. So for those who might not understand what this

00:43:34.220 is all about, during a national campaign, even during provincial campaigns, each party will

00:43:39.820 travel around the country or the province in sometimes in a plane, sometimes in a bus. And

00:43:44.300 as a journalist, as a member of the media, you can pay and it's quite a hefty fee. You pay

00:43:49.060 thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars to embed yourself into the campaign so that you

00:43:54.000 can travel so that you can get extra special access to the party leader and go around to events

00:43:58.880 and then you go and write about them. And so this has just sort of been part of Canadian politics

00:44:03.200 for a very long time. And well within their prerogative, well within their rights, the

00:44:07.020 Conservatives are saying, no, we don't want the legacy media on the inside. We don't want them

00:44:11.140 following us around. We don't want them to have this kind of special access to us. We would

00:44:15.640 actually rather just go around the country and talk to Canadians and talk to local journalists.

00:44:20.020 So if we are in Manitoba, we want to talk to the reporters from Manitoba. If we're in Newfoundland,

00:44:25.160 we want to talk to the reporters from Newfoundland. We don't need these Ottawa journalists who,

00:44:29.860 let's be real, they all hate the Conservatives. None of them will be voting for the Conservatives.

00:44:34.200 They will be going out of their way to nitpick Pierre Polyev, to look at him with a microscope, to try to create a scandal over anything that he does, anything possibly that he does.

00:44:45.040 This is exactly what they did with Andrew Scheer, is what they did before that with Stephen Harper.

00:44:50.100 To a lesser extent, Aaron O'Toole, I think Aaron O'Toole was his own problem in the 2021 campaign, but still the media were going out of their way.

00:44:56.980 I just remember one thing, I think there was a video at some point where Aaron O'Toole had gone

00:45:03.460 for a run and then he came home and he asked his wife to get him a beer so that they could like

00:45:08.100 sit and have a relaxing evening. And the media made a huge story about it. Oh my goodness,

00:45:11.860 how dare this man ask his wife to get him a beer? What a sexist, what a horrible person. 1.00

00:45:17.060 You know what the media does. They do it. They always do it. They do it time and time again. 1.00

00:45:20.260 And so, you know what, good for the Conservatives, good for Pierre Polyev to say, you know what,

00:45:24.660 you're not invited you're not allowed you can't come on our plane you can't come on our bus and 1.00

00:45:28.340 just to remind the viewer that the liberals do this all the time right it was andrew lawton

00:45:32.660 reporting for true north we wanted to embed him on the liberal campaign in 2019 we're willing

00:45:37.140 to pay the money we're willing to do everything they openly allowed all the other media outlets

00:45:41.140 to do it and they said no to true north because they didn't like andrew lawton or because they

00:45:44.820 believed that you know independent media shouldn't be on the campaign we ended up suing the true

00:45:49.860 to a government during that campaign. We won, and so Andrew Lawton eventually did get to go and ask

00:45:54.500 questions of the Prime Minister. But the Liberals do this stuff all the time. Nobody cares. The

00:45:58.660 Conservatives did it, and oh my goodness, did the media lose their mind. So just a few examples here.

00:46:04.180 We had Toronto Star columnist Althea Raj writing about it on X, just saying that it won't happen,

00:46:11.380 and oh my goodness, how dare they, basically. Paul Wells also wrote about it on Substack. Paul Wells

00:46:17.300 sort of said that well it's up to them they don't have to do it if they don't want to they probably

00:46:22.020 should but they but they won't um but lots and lots of reactions from the legacy media uh clutching

00:46:27.700 the pearls and condemning the conservatives for not allowing them to do this i you know i wouldn't

00:46:33.300 be surprised jasmine if the liberals do the same thing if the liberals just say yeah we're not going 1.00

00:46:36.980 to allow with mark carney yeah probably given how bad he is at this and every time he talks to the

00:46:41.380 press he you know steps in it i think that maybe we'll have a campaign where the legacy media and

00:46:46.660 the ottawa press gallery is just completely blocked out from both sides which i think would

00:46:50.740 be kind of fitting and deserving and entertaining what do you think i i do definitely agree with that

00:46:56.980 i think it's weird just solely because it's it's such a almost tradition i suppose i certainly

00:47:02.260 understand the motive behind it um and and again you know it's not that he's running and hiding

00:47:07.460 from anything it's that they're they're doing a big campaign tour and you know that's maybe i

00:47:13.140 I don't want to have CTV news misquoting me, uh, with everything that they hear me say behind the

00:47:18.180 scenes. Um, and I think that that is definitely very fair. I think if Mark Carney doesn't do

00:47:23.420 that, it'll probably end very poorly for him. Uh, so I almost kind of hope that he does allow

00:47:27.900 the press on, on his, but, uh, you know, I think as a whole, um, one thing, if I could say anything

00:47:34.020 at all to the conservative party of Canada, it would be, you know, if you're choosing to do this

00:47:39.220 great i i understand it okay but also you should really really be be speaking up more on on

00:47:46.340 independent uh podcasts independent sources things like that it's so so imperative because if you

00:47:52.900 aren't going to have the mainstream legacy media with you during those moments where perhaps they

00:47:57.460 won't go to your events maybe they won't know about them or they'll lie and say that they didn't

00:48:00.820 know about them and then you won't get as much coverage as other candidates who do allow them to

00:48:05.460 come by it's going to be more important than ever to get people to to get to know you you know and

00:48:10.100 i think too um the conservative party has been smeared and lied about and there's been so much

00:48:15.460 misguided disingenuous uh publications about them and stories about them and i think it's

00:48:20.820 about time that canadians stop believing every single thing that a headline reads um and and

00:48:27.940 that you know there's more of a more of a taking advantage i suppose of the amount of people like

00:48:34.500 yourself myself and so many others um who would absolutely love to have a sit-down conversation

00:48:39.780 and i just think that that could be really beneficial um especially if they're choosing

00:48:43.860 not to have media that will be reporting on them uh in a little bit more of a casual behind the

00:48:49.620 scenes way right like in a non-adversarial way like let's get to know the leader of the party

00:48:55.380 better let's get to know him in maybe different settings and environments other than just you know

00:49:00.260 political interviews. I think that's absolutely right. If anyone from Pierre Polyev's team is

00:49:04.020 watching, we would love to have Pierre Polyev back on this show. I know that Jasmine Lang would love

00:49:08.320 to have him on her show. So definitely, we'd like to see him go out there and do more interviews.

00:49:12.900 All right, Jasmine, thank you so much for joining the show. It's been great to have you.

00:49:15.560 That is Jasmine Lang. Go check out her YouTube page. It's really good, really entertaining.

00:49:19.720 And that's all the time we have for today. Thank you so much for joining us. We'll be back again

00:49:23.260 tomorrow with all the news. I'm Candace Malcolm. This is the Candace Malcolm Show. Thank you and

00:49:27.200 God bless.

00:49:30.260 Thank you.

Juno News - March 19, 2025

Trump says he PREFERS the Liberals in Canada

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript