UCP members want COVID vaxx policies to change
Episode Stats
Words per minute
179.50952
Harmful content
Hate speech
2
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, we take a look at the controversial injection of truth town hall hosted by the Constituency Association of Calgary and the surrounding areas, and hear from Councillor Daryl Comick, the president of the CA.
Transcript
00:00:00.840
Rachel Emanuel brings the news each day. On Alberta Roundup, she has her say.
00:00:11.200
Hey everyone, welcome back to the Alberta Roundup. I'm your host, Rachel Emanuel.
00:00:15.320
Today, I am joined by Daryl Comick. Comick is the president of the Constituency Association
00:00:20.620
for Calgary Law Heed. You guys are going to be able to hear him today, but due to some
00:00:24.920
connectivity issues that we're having, classic Alberta, we're just going to put a photo of
00:00:29.620
him up today. And him and I are going to be taking a look at the Injection of Truth town
00:00:34.340
hall that his CA hosted in Calgary Law Heed last week. Daryl, thanks so much for being
00:00:38.980
here today and sorry for the connectivity issues that we've been having this morning.
00:00:42.800
Well, we just roll with the punches. That seems to be the way we have to handle things these
00:00:47.100
days, Rachel. Absolutely. I couldn't have said it better myself. So let's start by taking
00:00:53.260
a look at this town hall, which took a look at COVID-19 vaccine data. Took a very critical
00:00:58.980
look. You guys had a lot of renowned experts come and give their two cents saying that they
00:01:03.900
believe the COVID-19 vaccine to be quite dangerous and recommended people against taking it. In
00:01:08.640
some cases, went to far as to suggest that those who had taken it should begin taking a
00:01:12.820
look at detoxing their body. This event was considered very controversial. I know that you
00:01:16.800
guys had it de-platform Femme Eventbrite and ended up having to sell the tickets through
00:01:21.160
another means. Were you surprised at how controversial this event was seen as?
00:01:26.220
Certainly, I was very surprised to see how controversial it was. I mean, we started this
00:01:31.960
by asking a simple question. We wanted to know if someone could explain to us why the
00:01:36.680
number of unexplained deaths in children in Alberta had increased by 350%. We hadn't even
00:01:41.900
asked the question about COVID jabs. It was simply this question based on AHS data. Ironically,
00:01:48.440
when we went through the data the 15th or 30th time, I'm not exactly sure, we found out that
00:01:54.000
we actually made a mistake and that it wasn't 350%. It was 3,328% increase in unexplained deaths.
00:02:02.500
Now, to most people, you'd think that's a big number. And to organizations that basically live
00:02:08.300
on polling data, you would have thought that someone at the government or at the AHS health
00:02:14.140
agencies would have said, there's something seriously wrong here. We should investigate.
00:02:18.580
It had a quick blip in the media, but then nothing happened. And so this whole idea of an injection
00:02:25.060
of truth was simply to try to find some real scientific data to explain that one question.
00:02:31.120
So when we take a look at the event itself, I know that the MLA for the region, Eric Bouchard,
00:02:39.200
he was in attendance as well as some other MLAs like Shane Getzen. Because of how controversial
00:02:44.240
this event was considered, were MLAs wary of attending? Was it difficult to actually get them
00:02:48.720
to commit to coming out? Well, certainly Eric had a strong support from his caucus friends to attend the
00:02:56.300
event. I mean, this question we have isn't just a question from Calgary Lockheed and one little
00:03:01.140
section of Calgary. This is a question for Canadians. I mean, at the end of the day, we had 18,000 people
00:03:07.360
in six countries streaming the event just to find some scientific data or potential answers to the
00:03:15.360
question. So I'm pretty sure that the amount of support that we got from caucus was because their
00:03:21.400
own constituents are saying, hey, will someone please answer this question?
00:03:25.420
There was some speculation at the time that Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's office wasn't pleased that
00:03:30.440
the event was going ahead. Did you ever hear anything from her or her office directly? Did they ask you to
00:03:36.120
cancel the event? Did they give it a green light? Anything from them at all on this event that took a
00:03:41.840
look at the COVID-19 vaccines? Certainly no. The Premier's office did not. She did not. I think there was a
00:03:49.860
sort of complicit consent. She did say on her radio show that she wanted to hear dissenting views or
00:03:55.840
contrary views. So she wasn't opposed to actually having it talked about. To me, from past history,
00:04:04.300
from other premiers and other presidents of UCP, our current group was very, very encouraging about
00:04:11.420
pursuing the answer. Because this is a member-driven question. This wasn't something that came from the
00:04:17.920
government. This came from the grassroots. We talked to the provincial party about it. They were 100% on
00:04:24.980
side with what we were doing and asking the question. Because we have a party policy about bodily autonomy.
00:04:29.940
So when you get into these issues of supporting conservative policy in Alberta, it's important
00:04:36.300
that the members show the policies that are top of mind to them and also to put as much education
00:04:42.980
and information forward for the government to make the right decision. Currently, Alberta Health
00:04:48.380
Services is still recommending the COVID-19 vaccine. It's on the vaccine schedule for babies as young as
00:04:54.640
six months. Recently, I had UCP Board President Rob Smith on the show. We talked about that. He said the
00:05:01.420
party really wants to see that policy change so that when doctors are speaking about the COVID-19 vaccine
00:05:07.600
to patients, they also have to tell them about some of the risks involved. What are your thoughts on this?
00:05:12.480
Would you like to see that date of six months being moved back so that, you know, babies are not being given
0.99
00:05:18.080
the COVID-19 vaccine? How do you think Alberta Health Services policy on COVID-19 vaccines should be changed?
00:05:23.880
Well, certainly when I listened to the science and the doctors that were presenting the information,
00:05:28.500
Eric Payne was very clear that said that kids don't need the COVID shot. He said that out loud.
00:05:35.420
Dr. Bridle said that the COVID shot was more damaging to people than the flu. So I think when you get into
00:05:42.160
the science, you see that it's not a necessary thing to have. Now, we live in a society of choice, and I'm sure
00:05:48.600
that the Alberta government is going to maintain the option of people being able to choose.
00:05:53.880
We would like to see, and we did provide scientific research, scientific data, the scientific paper
00:05:59.400
with recommendations based on the most current data that suggested that there should be much more
00:06:06.320
emphasis on the informed consent paper that people have to sign in order to take a COVID shot. And it
00:06:14.240
should be clear the dangers that people have. It's scientific fact. This isn't speculation. This
00:06:19.540
isn't misinformation. This is actual facts. And so the government should get on side with that. I
00:06:24.980
believe that they should put the word optional next to the COVID vaccines on the chart. Everyone says
00:06:31.560
that it's the parents' choice to inoculate or not inoculate their children. But by having it on the
00:06:37.620
site and on the list without any sort of notation, I think it basically says to parents that the
00:06:43.760
government endorses this particular process. And it doesn't really say parents and moms, dads have
00:06:50.060
the option of taking the shot with their kids or not.
00:06:54.340
As I mentioned, Rob Smith, you know, he's been saying that the party wants Alberta Premier Daniel
00:07:00.920
Smith and AHS to change the COVID-19 vaccine policy. He, of course, supported this town hall
00:07:05.720
in Calgary-Lougheed. He also said there might be more such events. To your knowledge, are there going
00:07:10.600
to be more CAs hosting events talking about and discussing the impacts of the COVID-19 vaccine?
00:07:15.780
There was two follow-up events. One happened in Red Deer and one happened in Mournville right after
00:07:20.640
the injection of truth. We certainly are looking at a second event that will focus on a very similar
00:07:27.680
topic just to, again, provide the science the opportunity to be vocal and not silence. I encourage
00:07:35.600
other CAs to have events like this. The town halls are very effective because people get to get other
00:07:43.600
information that they wouldn't get from mainstream media or legacy media or even the internet based on
00:07:49.200
some of the things that happened with censorship there. Another issue that came up was one of
00:07:54.140
compensation. So currently, if someone feels that they have been vaccine injured by the COVID-19
00:07:59.140
vaccine, the federal government has a program you can essentially apply for compensation and arguing
00:08:03.920
that you've been vaccine injured. Those requests are largely being denied. Almost anyone is, almost
00:08:09.540
everyone is being denied those requests for compensation. One of the doctors at the town hall said that
00:08:14.900
government should be responsible for compensating people who have been injured by the COVID-19
00:08:19.180
vaccines because governments, both federally and provincially, and in some cases even locally,
00:08:23.340
were responsible for pushing the vaccines, mandating them, and coercing people into being
00:08:28.260
vaccinated against COVID-19 vaccine. Is this a policy that you agree with? Is this something that you
00:08:33.020
would like to see here in Alberta where the government is actually taking a look at compensating people
00:08:36.960
who were harmed by the vaccine? Well, certainly, I think people who are harmed by this injection,
00:08:43.280
I mean, it's proven now to be a genetic modified therapy. It's not technically a vaccine by definition.
00:08:50.660
A vaccine is one shot and you protect yourself and the others around you. So clearly by Canada's own
0.87
00:08:56.520
definition, this has never been, it's not a vaccine. We have laws in Canada that protect Canadians
00:09:03.760
from taking any genetically modified shots. It's a federal government statute. So I think that the harms that
00:09:11.620
were caused by, you know, I saw a reference that says that no one was forced to take the jab.
00:09:19.160
Well, you know, there's a lot of moms and dads who would say, no, that's not true. If I didn't take it,
00:09:24.500
I wouldn't have had a job. I couldn't have paid my mortgage. I couldn't have fed my family. So
00:09:28.920
this kind of coercion, which again is in the, it's against the law in Canada to have coercion.
00:09:35.420
It's in the criminal code of Canada. So there, there needs to be a reckoning. And I think that
00:09:41.420
reckoning should come and it might mean compensation for people and it might mean admission of fault.
00:09:48.020
Right. So you just mentioned the policy for bodily autonomy. That was a United Conservative
00:09:54.720
Party resolution that was passed at the annual general meeting. The next annual general meeting
00:09:59.120
is going to be in November in Red Deer. Do you suspect that there's going to be more resolutions
00:10:03.720
put forward to make changes around the COVID-19 vaccine? Or do you think that the membership
00:10:09.960
largely feels this issue has been dealt with? Well, I think we can see from the response to
00:10:15.840
an injection of Truth Town Hall, both those people who attended, participated, and those people who
00:10:20.560
were so vocal against it. I mean, I got so much hate mail. It was, it was absolutely embarrassing to
00:10:28.120
think the Canadians would write emails like this. I do think that there is a strong grassroots movement
00:10:34.400
to say what, what happened here? What are these injections about? Why did you force us to take
00:10:41.680
them? What was the, what was the reasoning for it? And what was the science that was used to justify
00:10:46.660
such a widespread forced capture of people in Canada? So I see it likely that the process with the
00:10:55.380
policies, it goes through very rigorous process, screening, voting, and then ultimately it'll come
00:11:00.040
down to the top 30. I think one will appear on the floor of the convention. I don't think there's
00:11:05.860
any way to avoid it because this is what the members, I mean, there's 88,000 members and they're
00:11:11.300
saying, Hey, you know, if you look at the last AGM, the number of strong principled conservative
00:11:18.160
values and policies that were voted on, it was very clear that our membership understands the value of
00:11:25.760
family, freedom, and all these things that go with being conservative and we want it to be that way. So
00:11:32.720
I would suggest that yes, there will be at least one policy to be voted on, on some form of mandates.
00:11:41.360
Yeah, I'm inclined to agree with you. When Rob Smith was on the show, he said,
00:11:44.640
there's some people in the party who don't want to talk about COVID anymore. They say that's, you know,
00:11:49.360
in the past and should be left in the past. And I think there's a big argument to be made and that
00:11:53.200
a lot of the members are still very upset and would like to see more outcomes, more results,
00:11:59.040
because so many of the people who implemented these policies are still, of course, in positions of power
00:12:03.840
in the province, you know, whether that's elected officials or just government officials. So I think
00:12:08.560
there's still a lot of people who would like to see changes. I know there's a lot of people who are
00:12:11.680
really upset that the COVID-19 vaccine is still on the vaccine schedule, which sort of brings me to
00:12:17.920
my last question for you here is at this AGM, there will be a vote on whether to review Alberta Premier
00:12:24.960
Danielle Smith's premiership, essentially her leadership of the party, as happens after there
00:12:29.920
is a general election. Do you think that she's going to, you know, pass this with overwhelming
00:12:34.560
support? Or do you think there might be some issues for her among the UCP base?
00:12:38.400
I think that the members should overwhelmingly support her. I understand. I, for one, am someone
00:12:47.440
who wants things to move much quicker than they are. I want to see more movement on conservative values.
00:12:54.720
I also believe that, you know, we're in some difficult times in Alberta with such socialism being
00:13:00.640
supported by the federal government. I mean, Premier Smith is doing an incredible amount of work.
00:13:06.880
I'm sure there's a lot of foundational principles that are happening behind the scenes. So while I
00:13:12.880
disagree often, she allows me to disagree, which I thoroughly appreciate. She's respectful in our
00:13:20.400
conversation about issues and with other people. And I think, you know, it's a very complicated job,
00:13:26.880
trying to manage a province that, you know, basically has been off the rails for so many years.
00:13:32.800
And there's a lot of things to correct. So I think people should support her. I think people should
00:13:37.680
understand the complexity of the job. And I think that, you know, as conservatives, we need to keep
00:13:43.120
rowing in the same direction. We're very independently minded, and we think we know best.
00:13:48.560
But at some point in time, we have to realize that the opposition is incredibly well organized.
00:13:53.760
They often are told what to do. So they don't have the same luxury of choice. But as conservatives,
00:14:00.400
we should choose to support Daniel Smith going forward at the AGM.
00:14:05.920
Thank you, Rachel. And it would have been nice to be seen. I'll send you a picture.
00:14:11.520
I appreciate that. All right, guys, that's everything for today. I have sort of a bittersweet
00:14:18.080
announcement for all of you. Today was actually my last midweek episode of the Alberta Roundup. So Daryl's
00:14:23.440
probably my last interview for a little while. If you guys really enjoyed the interview episodes,
00:14:27.360
please let me know and I'll do my best to fit in, to still fit them in here and there.
00:14:31.600
Now, I'm not entirely canceling my Wednesday appearances. We are actually replacing it with
00:14:36.320
something else. But you're going to have to tune in to the Alberta Roundup on Saturday to find the
00:14:41.120
exciting announcement about what's coming next for True North and Rachel Emanuel. That'll be on
00:14:46.000
Saturday's episode. So thank you so much for tuning in. I will be back on Saturday. You guys will not
00:14:50.480
want to miss that announcement. Thanks so much. Have a great week.