Juno News - October 07, 2023


Uncovering the truth behind the ‘unmarked graves’


Episode Stats


Length

28 minutes

Words per minute

153.69365

Word count

4,419

Sentence count

187

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In 2021, shocking allegations surfaced regarding the discovery of 215 unmarked graves at the site of a former residential school in Camp Ups, British Columbia. It was an allegation that sent shockwaves through the media landscape portraying Canada as a genocidal nation. Fast forward to today, and the results of an excavation in Pine Creek, Manitoba, have been made public. But what exactly is the truth behind these allegations and what has its impact been on Indigenous communities? To make sense of this, we ll be discussing these findings with an expert on the subject.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey everyone, welcome to the Rupa Subramanya show. I'm Rupa Subramanya. Today we dive into
00:00:21.200 a story that lays bare the shocking truth behind a narrative that has dominated headlines in Canada
00:00:26.700 and abroad for a very long time. Remember in 2021, there were these horrifying allegations that
00:00:33.300 surfaced regarding the discovery of 215 children's graves at the site of a former residential school
00:00:40.420 in Camp Ups, British Columbia. It was an allegation that sent shockwaves through the media landscape
00:00:47.140 portraying Canada as this genocidal nation. Now let's start with the facts. There is no hard
00:00:52.500 evidence to support these allegations that 215 children's graves were found at this site of the
00:00:58.580 former residential school. Now, despite this lack of evidence, media outlets, legacy media outlets,
00:01:05.480 including the New York Times, the newspaper of record, rushed to amplify these claims,
00:01:10.380 fanning the flames of hate and division in Canada. They painted a picture of Canada as this country
00:01:15.420 steeped in guilt and remorse and shame and that it was a genocidal nation. It wasn't until May 2022 0.73
00:01:21.480 that other media outlets began to question this narrative, with the New York Post even going so
00:01:26.780 far as to label it the biggest fake news story in Canada. The skepticism was growing, but the damage
00:01:32.600 had already been done. Fast forward to today and the results of an excavation in Pine Creek, Manitoba,
00:01:38.500 once part of a residential school from 1890 to 1969, have been made public. But what exactly is the truth
00:01:45.620 behind its allegations and what has its impact been on Indigenous communities? To make sense of this,
00:01:51.920 we'll be discussing these findings with an expert on the subject. Karen Restoul is Vice President of
00:01:57.400 Crestview Strategy and is a member of the darkest First Nation and has a unique perspective on the 1.00
00:02:03.620 issues facing Indigenous communities in Canada. Hi, Karen. It's great to have you on my show to talk about a
00:02:09.860 very, very important topic and I'm really looking forward to our conversation. Let me first start
00:02:15.860 by asking you, Karen, the allegations of unmarked graves gained widespread attention after the claims
00:02:24.260 in Camp Loops, BC back in 2021. Can you discuss the impact of these allegations I've had on Canada
00:02:33.800 and its First Nations communities? Yeah, that's a big question, Rupa. First of all, thanks for having me
00:02:41.760 to have this conversation with you and your followers and listeners. I think it's a very timely one,
00:02:49.960 seeing as tomorrow we're going into the third National Day for Truth and Reconciliation.
00:02:57.140 The way I view the events that surfaced in 2021, I see that in a few different ways, from a few
00:03:10.280 different lenses. As an Indigenous person, none of this surprised me. Our communities have long
00:03:19.600 talked about or survivors have long talked about, families have long talked about the kids in their
00:03:26.800 communities who were forced to attend residential school and then never made it back home. Those
00:03:32.880 were just stories that existed. On that end, it was something that just reaffirmed what we knew to be
00:03:44.080 true. And in that, I think, was probably, how would I describe it, emotionally overwhelming. Because it was, you know,
00:03:55.760 it kind of was a reminder of that whole experience and that system that came down into our families and
00:04:03.360 communities and disrupted them. So it was quite tumultuous, I think, emotionally for a lot of folks who,
00:04:08.880 you know, who hadn't yet really kind of resolved themselves on that end. Through the lens of a
00:04:17.680 Canadian standing, you know, squarely next to other Canadian citizens, I had a ton of non-Indigenous 1.00
00:04:26.400 people within, within my circles reach out to say, oh my gosh, I had no idea that, you know, kids passed
00:04:35.680 away. And, you know, now I'm diving into the details in and around residential school and what occurred
00:04:44.240 at a lot of these schools. So it was a bit of a blow up moment for Canada in that, you know, as Canadians,
00:04:55.280 we were kind of taking a deeper dive into those federal policies that created those situations and
00:05:04.000 created a lot of discomfort and unease. And then there's a third part that I think merges like me
00:05:12.080 personally, both as an Indigenous woman and as a proud Canadian. It's the part where you look forward.
00:05:19.600 So it's like, okay, so now more people in Canada know that this happened. Our communities, you know,
00:05:26.320 are also kind of like getting themselves together to be able to undertake the work to get the answers
00:05:32.880 that so many families are looking for. And it's the action part is how do we organize ourselves to take
00:05:39.440 that first step forward, and bring about resolution, answers, clarity, certainty, to a situation that,
00:05:48.960 that has a lot of uncertainty. So that's, that's what I would say about, about that one.
00:05:54.960 Oh, yeah, no, absolutely, Karen. That's, that's well said. But let me ask you this. I mean, there is no question
00:06:02.400 that First Nations people in Canada and North America, in general, you know, there was a cultural genocide
00:06:10.080 of sorts that happened to them. And, you know, even to this day, you know, I've looked at some of the data,
00:06:16.240 and they underperform, they're, they're one of the, one of the most poorest communities in Canada,
00:06:21.840 Canada, they, they underperform even relative to new immigrants to Canada, on a range of socio economic 1.00
00:06:29.440 indicators, Indigenous people, you know, are just doing very, very badly. The fact of the matter is 1.00
00:06:37.760 that these, the, the unmarked graves, the controversy that erupted in 2021. The, the, the excavations have
00:06:47.200 yielded no evidence of human remains. It, that, what I want to say here is, that doesn't mean that
00:06:53.840 one is denying what happened to First Nations people. I just want you to address why, I mean,
00:07:00.000 the fact is that there was no evidence of human remains at these sites. And, and the media went
00:07:05.920 ahead and said that there were, you know, 215 bodies found on these sites. What do you make of the media
00:07:14.160 reporting of this when, when, when in reality, after the fact, there were no human remains that were
00:07:20.080 found on these sites? Yeah, I think the media has had to face itself in its own coverage of the
00:07:27.120 situation. It's interesting, like, the choice of language that was used in 2021 to describe
00:07:36.800 Takemloops' experience, you know, at no point did any leadership in Takemloops or any other community
00:07:44.160 say bodies or mass graves or other terms to kind of amplify and exaggerate what we were dealing with.
00:07:55.760 That said, this is where I think media and kind of media strategy kind of misses the mark. It's like,
00:08:06.000 do we really have to exaggerate the fact that some kids turned up dead at residential schools? Like,
00:08:13.440 I don't know that we have to exaggerate that point. And I can appreciate that, you know,
00:08:20.240 you go to journalism school, and they teach you how to write in a compelling way. And ultimately,
00:08:26.000 whoever they write for wants to draw in readers and generate business. And it really comes down to
00:08:31.280 revenue at the end of the day, I think we can all appreciate that. But at the same time, there has to be
00:08:36.400 some ethical boundaries around what it is that we're reporting on and how, and the language that we
00:08:43.600 use to describe those situations. So, you know, I think there are some media who could benefit from
00:08:51.360 a refresher on that end, or possibly even sitting down with someone from the Indigenous community to
00:08:58.320 kind of put a bit of colour into, you know, the picture that they see in black and white.
00:09:05.600 Yeah, no, absolutely. I think the media did a great injustice here to Indigenous communities by
00:09:14.080 exaggerating in the manner that they did. The crimes against Indigenous people are horrific enough. You
00:09:21.200 don't need to, you know, do this. And, you know, and that was deeply problematic, in my opinion. I want to
00:09:28.720 ask you, Karen, if you can speak to the role of ground penetrating technology, radar technology in these
00:09:34.480 excavations, and the limitations of this technology in confirming the presence of human remains.
00:09:42.480 Yeah, I'm really encouraged that there's more people asking this question about what GPR actually does.
00:09:50.080 Because again, in the early reports, media was saying that GPR was being used to identify bodies.
00:09:55.920 But those who kind of dive into the second or third layer in their research will learn that GPR
00:10:01.840 doesn't identify a body, they identify anomalies, shapes, shadows, if you will. And so, to report that
00:10:11.920 their bodies, I think, to our point that we've just made is flawed and irresponsible. And it, you know,
00:10:18.320 doesn't serve to help the situation at all. And Indigenous leaders have been speaking up more about
00:10:26.080 this very point, using platform, trusted platforms where they can trust that the information that they
00:10:32.800 convey is going to be, you know, relayed to the public in the same form that they deliver it.
00:10:38.800 So, GPR is being used. The way I understand it to be is that it is apparently the most recent technology
00:10:47.600 that we have available to send waves into the ground to determine whether or not there are anomalies.
00:10:56.000 But I understand that the GPR work is being undertaken with Church records. And apparently, those Church
00:11:05.840 records will demonstrate what systems were utilized in burying bodies. And so, what I mean by that,
00:11:14.960 for example, is like, you know, the Catholic Church, I don't know the exact dimensions, they might choose
00:11:21.120 to bury people in one straight row, maybe about three feet apart, and then give a certain distance
00:11:28.880 between that row and the next row. So, there are patterns between each Church, and each Church has
00:11:36.240 different patterns that they followed. And my understanding is that communities are taking
00:11:41.200 all of the information that they have available to them, as they undertake that work to complement
00:11:47.520 the GPR process. But, you know, like, I think a big theme here is certainty. We're all craving for it,
00:11:55.840 we're all working towards it. But at the same time, it's a bit of a bit of a slippery slope to get there.
00:12:03.120 Yeah. Going back to the media coverage of this incident, why do you think it took so long for the
00:12:10.640 media to begin to question this claim that there were actual bodies that were found? You know,
00:12:18.480 we're talking about the New York Times, the newspaper, a record, you know, with, you know,
00:12:24.880 going with these headlines, you know, and what do you think were the consequences of this delay in,
00:12:32.400 you know, in critically examining the matter later on? What do you think it did to
00:12:41.360 to Indigenous people? Yeah, so do you mean, like, the role in media in questioning
00:12:48.880 the quality of reporting from 2021? Or do you mean the role of media and just not covering this at
00:12:54.400 all until 2021? Because those are two... Well, both, actually. Those are actually,
00:12:58.640 no, I'm glad you pointed that out. I mean, those are actually two very, very important questions,
00:13:03.840 and I'm glad that you included the second one, but please, by all means, both questions are required,
00:13:09.920 you know? Yeah. Yeah.
00:13:11.520 Yeah. I'm not a journalist. I write, but I'm not a journalist, so I don't engage
00:13:17.920 fulsomely in that industry. Maybe there's a hesitation to challenge your colleagues on
00:13:26.400 the coverage, quality of coverage, that time, you know, timeliness of coverage that they provide,
00:13:32.240 the approach, who knows? You would know that more than me. Maybe it's the fact that we're too
00:13:37.200 Canadian, and we, you know, it's, we want to light step around tough questions and challenges and
00:13:44.240 confrontations, because I think Canadians, by and large, don't like to engage in uncomfortable
00:13:50.480 conversations, possibly the nature of the challenge. Like, are we going to question the reporting on
00:13:59.760 something so absolutely horrific and serious? And if we are going to question, how would you go about
00:14:07.040 doing that in a way that, you know, doesn't cast such a nasty light on you as a journalist or as a
00:14:14.080 reporter? So those are some questions, I don't have answers, but those are some questions that I,
00:14:20.080 or some points that I would consider, um, in evaluating, you know, the, the, the very kind of,
00:14:26.000 like, in intra journalistic, uh, accountability, I guess you could call it. Um, but I think at the end
00:14:35.280 of the day, like, there's, there's a way to do your job, and there's a way to do your job competently,
00:14:41.200 yet respectfully, right? And so, um, I think accountability, transparency are such important
00:14:48.640 principles, especially in today's world, because I, I think we're losing a bit of sight on those,
00:14:53.680 um, principles generally in society. Um, but it might be worth explaining, exploring, I think, uh,
00:15:00.560 more deeply. Um, on the, on the other point that I raised, why did it take so long? Like, this is a
00:15:06.960 question I asked myself. Uh, I followed the work of the TRC, um, and, uh, when they issued their final
00:15:14.960 report in 2015, there's an entire volume on this, like, an entire volume with data and case studies,
00:15:25.120 if you will. Like, I don't, I don't like calling them case studies, but, like, essentially, they're,
00:15:29.920 they're, you know, real life examples of children that, um, that passed on while they were attending
00:15:37.440 school, right? While they, while they were at residential schools. So, I, I have a big question
00:15:42.400 on that. Like, why, like, no one was really, I guess, paying attention, or maybe it wasn't real
00:15:48.320 enough because it was in black and white letters on paper, and, uh, people don't generally find, you
00:15:54.160 know, facts or information compelling, um, doesn't really speak to, you know, the emotional part of
00:16:01.360 our, of our human system, uh, that would respond to that. So, I think I try, like, I try not to harp
00:16:08.160 too much on, like, why didn't we? Um, and I think there's a lot of value in, uh, the fact that we did
00:16:15.280 get there, you know, six years later in 2021, that Takem Loops had the courage to share their story
00:16:20.640 publicly, um, and that, um, subsequently, you know, the country, I think, grew a lot, uh, in those days
00:16:29.120 and in the weeks to follow. Yeah, I think, I think the only positive thing that I can think about the
00:16:35.120 media coverage about this is that it, it, it once again highlighted the atrocities, um, uh, that, um,
00:16:42.880 that Indigenous people have had to face, um, and, you know, I think it makes us once again aware of it,
00:16:50.320 but I just wish they hadn't exaggerated, uh, in the manner that they did, because I feel like it
00:16:55.360 ended up, yeah, re-traumatized, uh, people once all over again, as, uh, you yourself, uh, said at
00:17:02.960 the beginning, you know, it made you aware of this, uh, you know, in, in, in a way that, you know,
00:17:08.240 it was very troubling to you. So, um, you know, but coming back to future excavations and
00:17:15.280 investigations related to residential schools, how do we, um, how do we, um, you know, what steps
00:17:21.440 should we take to ensure that these are conducted with, uh, the greatest amount of transparency,
00:17:26.480 sensitivity, and commitment to, commitment to the truth? Yeah, that's actually a key question,
00:17:33.600 because the one thing that we know is that when government gets involved and tells us how to live
00:17:38.960 our lives and how to take action and take steps forward, it, in my experience, from what I've,
00:17:44.160 I've read, uh, seen and experienced, like it's, it never works out, right? So this first things first,
00:17:51.280 um, you know, government cannot be leading the work to, uh, to, you know, to seek truth and justice in
00:17:58.720 this process. So I think we can all agree on that principle, or maybe some would disagree with me,
00:18:04.800 but I think, you know, a lot of us would agree that government needs to stay out of the way on
00:18:09.440 this one, especially. Um, the, the communities, like I'm a huge fan of the principle of self-determination,
00:18:17.920 um, in the sense that if a community, like it's up to a community to decide what it's going to
00:18:24.400 undertake and to what degree. There are some Indigenous teachings, um, that, uh, set out very clearly
00:18:34.000 where the body, you know, where the spirit leaves the body, that's where the body is to stay.
00:18:39.680 Right. There are other Indigenous protocols and, uh, an ideology where, um, you know, where that,
00:18:46.640 uh, you know, that body has to be returned home. Um, right. So like, who are we to say,
00:18:54.720 armchair quarterbacks over here, how like some small community in like Northern BC is going to undertake,
00:19:01.200 um, you know, their work on this front. So I think letting communities lead for themselves,
00:19:07.680 you know what, Rupa, like maybe some communities just don't want to deal with it at all and that's okay.
00:19:13.120 Right. Like maybe they're just not ready. Um, so I try, uh, to reserve judgment and encourage others to
00:19:20.080 do the same and just say, listen, imagine like your kid or, you know, your cousin, uh, you remember
00:19:30.080 they never made it home. And then you and your family are now faced with this very emotional,
00:19:35.680 very challenging issue, uh, question and how are, you know, how are you going to be able to kind
00:19:42.960 of step through that in order to get to a decision as to whether, you know, how you would go about
00:19:48.000 dealing with this. I would say on average Canadians would struggle big time if they had, if they were
00:19:53.280 faced with that decision. So communities, I think take, you know, need the time and should be taking the
00:19:58.880 time, uh, to undertake that work. Uh, final question for you, Karen, um, how do we promote, 0.97
00:20:06.560 uh, reconciliation, uh, do, do steps like, uh, land acknowledgements, uh, and I have a view on land
00:20:13.440 acknowledgements. Um, I personally think that, um, you know, they're not actually addressing the
00:20:19.360 concerns of indigenous communities. You know, it is just basically, um, you know, it's, it's the laziest 1.00
00:20:26.720 thing to do in my opinion when indigenous communities are struggling to get clean drinking 1.00
00:20:31.680 water in a G7 nation. Um, so, you know, do, do steps like that really help promote reconciliation?
00:20:38.640 Are indigenous people actually, I know you can't speak on behalf of everybody, but just speaking
00:20:44.240 for yourself, do you think those things make a difference in the end? So my kind of like quick
00:20:51.200 answer to that is if they weren't happening, you and I wouldn't be talking about it right now.
00:20:56.560 So number one, if it seeks to challenge, you know, to create, uh, discourse and dialogue,
00:21:04.560 uh, whether it's about the very nature of whether we should do them, whether or not it's sufficient
00:21:09.440 to do them or insufficient. And I agree with you, like, it seems quite topical and performative, uh,
00:21:15.920 at times. Um, but nonetheless, I'm a huge fan of discussion and dialogues. One of the reasons I
00:21:22.880 I am joining you here today. Um, and, and, and by that, I mean, like, uh, not, you know,
00:21:29.680 not with people that you would necessarily agree with, right? Like it's okay to have tough conversations
00:21:34.560 with people who may come at it from a different, uh, ideology, a different experience, um, different
00:21:41.600 considerations. That said, um, land acknowledgements, uh, so I created an app called Who's Land.
00:21:49.040 Uh, it's web based and you can go to the Apple store. We were the featured app this year on June
00:21:54.480 21st, which is pretty exciting. So we're 2 million view, uh, users today. Uh, awesome since we just
00:22:01.280 launched like four ish years ago. Um, and essentially we created it for this very reason. Number one, like,
00:22:08.400 where are people going to get their information? Well, now there's an app for that. So you go to
00:22:13.680 the app and you look around and you, you can, there's, there's an option where you can plug in
00:22:18.320 your city and it'll auto populate like which treaty territory you're in, what nations would have been
00:22:24.880 there before. Um, what are the closest communities to that city? And then from there, like, you know, have
00:22:32.480 the, um, curiosity to look it up and learn more about the history of that territory. Um, and, uh, you know,
00:22:42.400 like you learn things like, um, uh, let's say in Toronto, uh, everyone I think knows Spadina. Um, that's
00:22:51.920 actually one of the original trails that ran from the lakeshore, uh, up into, uh, the escarpment here.
00:22:59.120 And, uh, its original name is Espadina. Um, so naturally became Spadina. Um, and then you can
00:23:07.920 imagine, you know, like why they would have been running up and down that trail over to the water,
00:23:14.640 what contact would have looked like at that point, right? There's a lot of information and history out
00:23:19.440 there and stories that make it really compelling. So there's that kind of like more inquisitive angle.
00:23:24.880 And then, uh, so like learn more about the place that you're standing on. I think it's like a natural,
00:23:31.440 you don't have to be in Canada for that. Like, but then there's the action part to your point.
00:23:36.240 I actually don't see land acknowledgements as land acknowledgements anymore. I see them as like
00:23:40.720 statements of reconciliation. So you're acknowledging where you are. Great. But like, what are you doing
00:23:48.720 personally and like collectively in whatever institution that you represent, like, what are
00:23:54.560 you doing to contribute to the solution? Like I'm a huge, huge fan of results. I love your point that
00:24:01.440 you raised about, you know, we don't even have clean drinking water in these communities across the
00:24:05.920 country. Like what's up with that? That's, that's not okay. So why not use that opportunity to question,
00:24:13.120 to challenge, but also to commit to some sort of contribution to like moving ourselves in, in,
00:24:19.200 in, uh, in the right direction.
00:24:20.960 Well, that's a very well said, Karen. And, um, you know, I know you have to go, but I really
00:24:27.200 appreciate this, uh, great conversation with you. Um, uh, and you know, it was, uh, uh, a privilege to
00:24:34.560 get your insight into this very important topic, uh, on this third anniversary.
00:24:39.360 Can I ask you a question?
00:24:41.040 Sure.
00:24:42.080 Um, sorry. I just want to raise a, like a, another point before we close.
00:24:47.520 I'd be curious to hear you mentioned at the beginning of your show
00:24:50.800 of the show that, um, the disparity between, um, Indigenous people in Canada versus immigrant
00:24:59.360 families and individuals. Um, that's a point that not a lot of people are talking about.
00:25:05.600 Uh, but it's certainly a point that myself and, you know, many cousins and I talk about from time
00:25:11.200 to time. Um, and it's something that we have taken note of and we question and challenge ourselves to
00:25:18.000 determine why is that. Right. Um, but that said, you know, there's no data and there's a whole other
00:25:25.200 issue around like data sovereignty and questions around collecting data about Indigenous people.
00:25:30.400 I would say qualitatively.
00:25:33.360 So yes, there, there are disparities and yes, you know, we, we were challenged to kind of turn ourselves
00:25:39.280 around within a generation or two, if you were to draw a comparator to immigrant families.
00:25:44.160 Um, but at the same time, qualitatively, I think you look around and you can see
00:25:52.160 a lot of Indigenous people who are, you know, stepping into their place in society.
00:26:01.440 And what I'm seeing particularly with the generation that are in their twenties right now,
00:26:06.160 they were raised by parents who made it okay for them. There was, there was no shame in being
00:26:16.640 Indigenous, right? Like that generation, the, the 20 year olds and the teens today, it's parents who
00:26:22.800 are in their thirties and forties who now understand the shame that was caused by the church and state
00:26:28.240 and have fundamentally rejected that and on it and are walking through the world very proudly to be
00:26:33.760 who they are as Anishinaabe, as Indigenous people. And you can imagine what it's like to be raised by
00:26:40.240 that messaging. And so that's what we're seeing in teens and 20 year olds today, very strongly rooted
00:26:45.760 and positioned in their identity and proud. Uh, but also equipping themselves with tools, you know,
00:26:53.840 like sure university degrees, but like, you know, trade certification or whatnot and really kind of
00:27:00.560 trucking forward, um, and reclaiming, you know, a place, uh, within their communities, um, and really
00:27:07.840 moving things and a pretty awesome direction. So I'm with you, there are disparities, but I'm a huge fan
00:27:14.800 of looking at the flip side of things. What, you know, what improvements, what steps forward, what
00:27:20.400 advancements are we making? And I'm seeing, I'm, I'm really encouraged about it. Like we're making
00:27:25.680 strides here. No, that's, uh, thank you for, um, um, giving us that perspective. That should have been
00:27:31.440 one of my questions to you, actually. Maybe you should do the show, but, uh, uh, but that is, that is a
00:27:38.160 very valuable perspective because what is the current, uh, how are young Indigenous, uh, people doing these
00:27:45.200 days? Well, you know, what are they thinking of how, how do they see themselves in this world? Where
00:27:49.760 do they see their future? And these are very, very important questions. And yes, I mean, the data show
00:27:54.480 that, um, uh, Indigenous communities, uh, fare poorly on a range of socioeconomic indicators relative to
00:28:01.600 other groups, including immigrants. But there is also, there's also a lot of hope within this community,
00:28:06.880 as you point out. And that's, uh, that's, that's very important. And, uh, thank you for, uh, sharing that with
00:28:13.120 us and I'm heartened. I'm hoping that this gap will close in, you know, in a generation or two or
00:28:19.520 perhaps even less. Um, and, uh, and, and, you know, and then we won't be having these kinds of
00:28:26.240 conversations hopefully, but, uh, but thank you so much, Karen. And, uh, I really hope to have you
00:28:31.840 again soon and, uh, really, uh, enjoyed this conversation and for sharing your perspective with us.
00:28:37.680 Thanks so much. Happy to join. Thanks.
00:28:40.560 Thanks.
00:28:43.120 Thanks.