Juno News - October 07, 2023
Uncovering the truth behind the ‘unmarked graves’
Episode Stats
Words per minute
153.69365
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Hate speech
7
sentences flagged
Summary
In 2021, shocking allegations surfaced regarding the discovery of 215 unmarked graves at the site of a former residential school in Camp Ups, British Columbia. It was an allegation that sent shockwaves through the media landscape portraying Canada as a genocidal nation. Fast forward to today, and the results of an excavation in Pine Creek, Manitoba, have been made public. But what exactly is the truth behind these allegations and what has its impact been on Indigenous communities? To make sense of this, we ll be discussing these findings with an expert on the subject.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey everyone, welcome to the Rupa Subramanya show. I'm Rupa Subramanya. Today we dive into
00:00:21.200
a story that lays bare the shocking truth behind a narrative that has dominated headlines in Canada
00:00:26.700
and abroad for a very long time. Remember in 2021, there were these horrifying allegations that
00:00:33.300
surfaced regarding the discovery of 215 children's graves at the site of a former residential school
00:00:40.420
in Camp Ups, British Columbia. It was an allegation that sent shockwaves through the media landscape
00:00:47.140
portraying Canada as this genocidal nation. Now let's start with the facts. There is no hard
00:00:52.500
evidence to support these allegations that 215 children's graves were found at this site of the
00:00:58.580
former residential school. Now, despite this lack of evidence, media outlets, legacy media outlets,
00:01:05.480
including the New York Times, the newspaper of record, rushed to amplify these claims,
00:01:10.380
fanning the flames of hate and division in Canada. They painted a picture of Canada as this country
00:01:15.420
steeped in guilt and remorse and shame and that it was a genocidal nation. It wasn't until May 2022
0.73
00:01:21.480
that other media outlets began to question this narrative, with the New York Post even going so
00:01:26.780
far as to label it the biggest fake news story in Canada. The skepticism was growing, but the damage
00:01:32.600
had already been done. Fast forward to today and the results of an excavation in Pine Creek, Manitoba,
00:01:38.500
once part of a residential school from 1890 to 1969, have been made public. But what exactly is the truth
00:01:45.620
behind its allegations and what has its impact been on Indigenous communities? To make sense of this,
00:01:51.920
we'll be discussing these findings with an expert on the subject. Karen Restoul is Vice President of
00:01:57.400
Crestview Strategy and is a member of the darkest First Nation and has a unique perspective on the
1.00
00:02:03.620
issues facing Indigenous communities in Canada. Hi, Karen. It's great to have you on my show to talk about a
00:02:09.860
very, very important topic and I'm really looking forward to our conversation. Let me first start
00:02:15.860
by asking you, Karen, the allegations of unmarked graves gained widespread attention after the claims
00:02:24.260
in Camp Loops, BC back in 2021. Can you discuss the impact of these allegations I've had on Canada
00:02:33.800
and its First Nations communities? Yeah, that's a big question, Rupa. First of all, thanks for having me
00:02:41.760
to have this conversation with you and your followers and listeners. I think it's a very timely one,
00:02:49.960
seeing as tomorrow we're going into the third National Day for Truth and Reconciliation.
00:02:57.140
The way I view the events that surfaced in 2021, I see that in a few different ways, from a few
00:03:10.280
different lenses. As an Indigenous person, none of this surprised me. Our communities have long
00:03:19.600
talked about or survivors have long talked about, families have long talked about the kids in their
00:03:26.800
communities who were forced to attend residential school and then never made it back home. Those
00:03:32.880
were just stories that existed. On that end, it was something that just reaffirmed what we knew to be
00:03:44.080
true. And in that, I think, was probably, how would I describe it, emotionally overwhelming. Because it was, you know,
00:03:55.760
it kind of was a reminder of that whole experience and that system that came down into our families and
00:04:03.360
communities and disrupted them. So it was quite tumultuous, I think, emotionally for a lot of folks who,
00:04:08.880
you know, who hadn't yet really kind of resolved themselves on that end. Through the lens of a
00:04:17.680
Canadian standing, you know, squarely next to other Canadian citizens, I had a ton of non-Indigenous
1.00
00:04:26.400
people within, within my circles reach out to say, oh my gosh, I had no idea that, you know, kids passed
00:04:35.680
away. And, you know, now I'm diving into the details in and around residential school and what occurred
00:04:44.240
at a lot of these schools. So it was a bit of a blow up moment for Canada in that, you know, as Canadians,
00:04:55.280
we were kind of taking a deeper dive into those federal policies that created those situations and
00:05:04.000
created a lot of discomfort and unease. And then there's a third part that I think merges like me
00:05:12.080
personally, both as an Indigenous woman and as a proud Canadian. It's the part where you look forward.
00:05:19.600
So it's like, okay, so now more people in Canada know that this happened. Our communities, you know,
00:05:26.320
are also kind of like getting themselves together to be able to undertake the work to get the answers
00:05:32.880
that so many families are looking for. And it's the action part is how do we organize ourselves to take
00:05:39.440
that first step forward, and bring about resolution, answers, clarity, certainty, to a situation that,
00:05:48.960
that has a lot of uncertainty. So that's, that's what I would say about, about that one.
00:05:54.960
Oh, yeah, no, absolutely, Karen. That's, that's well said. But let me ask you this. I mean, there is no question
00:06:02.400
that First Nations people in Canada and North America, in general, you know, there was a cultural genocide
00:06:10.080
of sorts that happened to them. And, you know, even to this day, you know, I've looked at some of the data,
00:06:16.240
and they underperform, they're, they're one of the, one of the most poorest communities in Canada,
00:06:21.840
Canada, they, they underperform even relative to new immigrants to Canada, on a range of socio economic
1.00
00:06:29.440
indicators, Indigenous people, you know, are just doing very, very badly. The fact of the matter is
1.00
00:06:37.760
that these, the, the unmarked graves, the controversy that erupted in 2021. The, the, the excavations have
00:06:47.200
yielded no evidence of human remains. It, that, what I want to say here is, that doesn't mean that
00:06:53.840
one is denying what happened to First Nations people. I just want you to address why, I mean,
00:07:00.000
the fact is that there was no evidence of human remains at these sites. And, and the media went
00:07:05.920
ahead and said that there were, you know, 215 bodies found on these sites. What do you make of the media
00:07:14.160
reporting of this when, when, when in reality, after the fact, there were no human remains that were
00:07:20.080
found on these sites? Yeah, I think the media has had to face itself in its own coverage of the
00:07:27.120
situation. It's interesting, like, the choice of language that was used in 2021 to describe
00:07:36.800
Takemloops' experience, you know, at no point did any leadership in Takemloops or any other community
00:07:44.160
say bodies or mass graves or other terms to kind of amplify and exaggerate what we were dealing with.
00:07:55.760
That said, this is where I think media and kind of media strategy kind of misses the mark. It's like,
00:08:06.000
do we really have to exaggerate the fact that some kids turned up dead at residential schools? Like,
00:08:13.440
I don't know that we have to exaggerate that point. And I can appreciate that, you know,
00:08:20.240
you go to journalism school, and they teach you how to write in a compelling way. And ultimately,
00:08:26.000
whoever they write for wants to draw in readers and generate business. And it really comes down to
00:08:31.280
revenue at the end of the day, I think we can all appreciate that. But at the same time, there has to be
00:08:36.400
some ethical boundaries around what it is that we're reporting on and how, and the language that we
00:08:43.600
use to describe those situations. So, you know, I think there are some media who could benefit from
00:08:51.360
a refresher on that end, or possibly even sitting down with someone from the Indigenous community to
00:08:58.320
kind of put a bit of colour into, you know, the picture that they see in black and white.
00:09:05.600
Yeah, no, absolutely. I think the media did a great injustice here to Indigenous communities by
00:09:14.080
exaggerating in the manner that they did. The crimes against Indigenous people are horrific enough. You
00:09:21.200
don't need to, you know, do this. And, you know, and that was deeply problematic, in my opinion. I want to
00:09:28.720
ask you, Karen, if you can speak to the role of ground penetrating technology, radar technology in these
00:09:34.480
excavations, and the limitations of this technology in confirming the presence of human remains.
00:09:42.480
Yeah, I'm really encouraged that there's more people asking this question about what GPR actually does.
00:09:50.080
Because again, in the early reports, media was saying that GPR was being used to identify bodies.
00:09:55.920
But those who kind of dive into the second or third layer in their research will learn that GPR
00:10:01.840
doesn't identify a body, they identify anomalies, shapes, shadows, if you will. And so, to report that
00:10:11.920
their bodies, I think, to our point that we've just made is flawed and irresponsible. And it, you know,
00:10:18.320
doesn't serve to help the situation at all. And Indigenous leaders have been speaking up more about
00:10:26.080
this very point, using platform, trusted platforms where they can trust that the information that they
00:10:32.800
convey is going to be, you know, relayed to the public in the same form that they deliver it.
00:10:38.800
So, GPR is being used. The way I understand it to be is that it is apparently the most recent technology
00:10:47.600
that we have available to send waves into the ground to determine whether or not there are anomalies.
00:10:56.000
But I understand that the GPR work is being undertaken with Church records. And apparently, those Church
00:11:05.840
records will demonstrate what systems were utilized in burying bodies. And so, what I mean by that,
00:11:14.960
for example, is like, you know, the Catholic Church, I don't know the exact dimensions, they might choose
00:11:21.120
to bury people in one straight row, maybe about three feet apart, and then give a certain distance
00:11:28.880
between that row and the next row. So, there are patterns between each Church, and each Church has
00:11:36.240
different patterns that they followed. And my understanding is that communities are taking
00:11:41.200
all of the information that they have available to them, as they undertake that work to complement
00:11:47.520
the GPR process. But, you know, like, I think a big theme here is certainty. We're all craving for it,
00:11:55.840
we're all working towards it. But at the same time, it's a bit of a bit of a slippery slope to get there.
00:12:03.120
Yeah. Going back to the media coverage of this incident, why do you think it took so long for the
00:12:10.640
media to begin to question this claim that there were actual bodies that were found? You know,
00:12:18.480
we're talking about the New York Times, the newspaper, a record, you know, with, you know,
00:12:24.880
going with these headlines, you know, and what do you think were the consequences of this delay in,
00:12:32.400
you know, in critically examining the matter later on? What do you think it did to
00:12:41.360
to Indigenous people? Yeah, so do you mean, like, the role in media in questioning
00:12:48.880
the quality of reporting from 2021? Or do you mean the role of media and just not covering this at
00:12:54.400
all until 2021? Because those are two... Well, both, actually. Those are actually,
00:12:58.640
no, I'm glad you pointed that out. I mean, those are actually two very, very important questions,
00:13:03.840
and I'm glad that you included the second one, but please, by all means, both questions are required,
00:13:11.520
Yeah. I'm not a journalist. I write, but I'm not a journalist, so I don't engage
00:13:17.920
fulsomely in that industry. Maybe there's a hesitation to challenge your colleagues on
00:13:26.400
the coverage, quality of coverage, that time, you know, timeliness of coverage that they provide,
00:13:32.240
the approach, who knows? You would know that more than me. Maybe it's the fact that we're too
00:13:37.200
Canadian, and we, you know, it's, we want to light step around tough questions and challenges and
00:13:44.240
confrontations, because I think Canadians, by and large, don't like to engage in uncomfortable
00:13:50.480
conversations, possibly the nature of the challenge. Like, are we going to question the reporting on
00:13:59.760
something so absolutely horrific and serious? And if we are going to question, how would you go about
00:14:07.040
doing that in a way that, you know, doesn't cast such a nasty light on you as a journalist or as a
00:14:14.080
reporter? So those are some questions, I don't have answers, but those are some questions that I,
00:14:20.080
or some points that I would consider, um, in evaluating, you know, the, the, the very kind of,
00:14:26.000
like, in intra journalistic, uh, accountability, I guess you could call it. Um, but I think at the end
00:14:35.280
of the day, like, there's, there's a way to do your job, and there's a way to do your job competently,
00:14:41.200
yet respectfully, right? And so, um, I think accountability, transparency are such important
00:14:48.640
principles, especially in today's world, because I, I think we're losing a bit of sight on those,
00:14:53.680
um, principles generally in society. Um, but it might be worth explaining, exploring, I think, uh,
00:15:00.560
more deeply. Um, on the, on the other point that I raised, why did it take so long? Like, this is a
00:15:06.960
question I asked myself. Uh, I followed the work of the TRC, um, and, uh, when they issued their final
00:15:14.960
report in 2015, there's an entire volume on this, like, an entire volume with data and case studies,
00:15:25.120
if you will. Like, I don't, I don't like calling them case studies, but, like, essentially, they're,
00:15:29.920
they're, you know, real life examples of children that, um, that passed on while they were attending
00:15:37.440
school, right? While they, while they were at residential schools. So, I, I have a big question
00:15:42.400
on that. Like, why, like, no one was really, I guess, paying attention, or maybe it wasn't real
00:15:48.320
enough because it was in black and white letters on paper, and, uh, people don't generally find, you
00:15:54.160
know, facts or information compelling, um, doesn't really speak to, you know, the emotional part of
00:16:01.360
our, of our human system, uh, that would respond to that. So, I think I try, like, I try not to harp
00:16:08.160
too much on, like, why didn't we? Um, and I think there's a lot of value in, uh, the fact that we did
00:16:15.280
get there, you know, six years later in 2021, that Takem Loops had the courage to share their story
00:16:20.640
publicly, um, and that, um, subsequently, you know, the country, I think, grew a lot, uh, in those days
00:16:29.120
and in the weeks to follow. Yeah, I think, I think the only positive thing that I can think about the
00:16:35.120
media coverage about this is that it, it, it once again highlighted the atrocities, um, uh, that, um,
00:16:42.880
that Indigenous people have had to face, um, and, you know, I think it makes us once again aware of it,
00:16:50.320
but I just wish they hadn't exaggerated, uh, in the manner that they did, because I feel like it
00:16:55.360
ended up, yeah, re-traumatized, uh, people once all over again, as, uh, you yourself, uh, said at
00:17:02.960
the beginning, you know, it made you aware of this, uh, you know, in, in, in a way that, you know,
00:17:08.240
it was very troubling to you. So, um, you know, but coming back to future excavations and
00:17:15.280
investigations related to residential schools, how do we, um, how do we, um, you know, what steps
00:17:21.440
should we take to ensure that these are conducted with, uh, the greatest amount of transparency,
00:17:26.480
sensitivity, and commitment to, commitment to the truth? Yeah, that's actually a key question,
00:17:33.600
because the one thing that we know is that when government gets involved and tells us how to live
00:17:38.960
our lives and how to take action and take steps forward, it, in my experience, from what I've,
00:17:44.160
I've read, uh, seen and experienced, like it's, it never works out, right? So this first things first,
00:17:51.280
um, you know, government cannot be leading the work to, uh, to, you know, to seek truth and justice in
00:17:58.720
this process. So I think we can all agree on that principle, or maybe some would disagree with me,
00:18:04.800
but I think, you know, a lot of us would agree that government needs to stay out of the way on
00:18:09.440
this one, especially. Um, the, the communities, like I'm a huge fan of the principle of self-determination,
00:18:17.920
um, in the sense that if a community, like it's up to a community to decide what it's going to
00:18:24.400
undertake and to what degree. There are some Indigenous teachings, um, that, uh, set out very clearly
00:18:34.000
where the body, you know, where the spirit leaves the body, that's where the body is to stay.
00:18:39.680
Right. There are other Indigenous protocols and, uh, an ideology where, um, you know, where that,
00:18:46.640
uh, you know, that body has to be returned home. Um, right. So like, who are we to say,
00:18:54.720
armchair quarterbacks over here, how like some small community in like Northern BC is going to undertake,
00:19:01.200
um, you know, their work on this front. So I think letting communities lead for themselves,
00:19:07.680
you know what, Rupa, like maybe some communities just don't want to deal with it at all and that's okay.
00:19:13.120
Right. Like maybe they're just not ready. Um, so I try, uh, to reserve judgment and encourage others to
00:19:20.080
do the same and just say, listen, imagine like your kid or, you know, your cousin, uh, you remember
00:19:30.080
they never made it home. And then you and your family are now faced with this very emotional,
00:19:35.680
very challenging issue, uh, question and how are, you know, how are you going to be able to kind
00:19:42.960
of step through that in order to get to a decision as to whether, you know, how you would go about
00:19:48.000
dealing with this. I would say on average Canadians would struggle big time if they had, if they were
00:19:53.280
faced with that decision. So communities, I think take, you know, need the time and should be taking the
00:19:58.880
time, uh, to undertake that work. Uh, final question for you, Karen, um, how do we promote,
0.97
00:20:06.560
uh, reconciliation, uh, do, do steps like, uh, land acknowledgements, uh, and I have a view on land
00:20:13.440
acknowledgements. Um, I personally think that, um, you know, they're not actually addressing the
00:20:19.360
concerns of indigenous communities. You know, it is just basically, um, you know, it's, it's the laziest
1.00
00:20:26.720
thing to do in my opinion when indigenous communities are struggling to get clean drinking
1.00
00:20:31.680
water in a G7 nation. Um, so, you know, do, do steps like that really help promote reconciliation?
00:20:38.640
Are indigenous people actually, I know you can't speak on behalf of everybody, but just speaking
00:20:44.240
for yourself, do you think those things make a difference in the end? So my kind of like quick
00:20:51.200
answer to that is if they weren't happening, you and I wouldn't be talking about it right now.
00:20:56.560
So number one, if it seeks to challenge, you know, to create, uh, discourse and dialogue,
00:21:04.560
uh, whether it's about the very nature of whether we should do them, whether or not it's sufficient
00:21:09.440
to do them or insufficient. And I agree with you, like, it seems quite topical and performative, uh,
00:21:15.920
at times. Um, but nonetheless, I'm a huge fan of discussion and dialogues. One of the reasons I
00:21:22.880
I am joining you here today. Um, and, and, and by that, I mean, like, uh, not, you know,
00:21:29.680
not with people that you would necessarily agree with, right? Like it's okay to have tough conversations
00:21:34.560
with people who may come at it from a different, uh, ideology, a different experience, um, different
00:21:41.600
considerations. That said, um, land acknowledgements, uh, so I created an app called Who's Land.
00:21:49.040
Uh, it's web based and you can go to the Apple store. We were the featured app this year on June
00:21:54.480
21st, which is pretty exciting. So we're 2 million view, uh, users today. Uh, awesome since we just
00:22:01.280
launched like four ish years ago. Um, and essentially we created it for this very reason. Number one, like,
00:22:08.400
where are people going to get their information? Well, now there's an app for that. So you go to
00:22:13.680
the app and you look around and you, you can, there's, there's an option where you can plug in
00:22:18.320
your city and it'll auto populate like which treaty territory you're in, what nations would have been
00:22:24.880
there before. Um, what are the closest communities to that city? And then from there, like, you know, have
00:22:32.480
the, um, curiosity to look it up and learn more about the history of that territory. Um, and, uh, you know,
00:22:42.400
like you learn things like, um, uh, let's say in Toronto, uh, everyone I think knows Spadina. Um, that's
00:22:51.920
actually one of the original trails that ran from the lakeshore, uh, up into, uh, the escarpment here.
00:22:59.120
And, uh, its original name is Espadina. Um, so naturally became Spadina. Um, and then you can
00:23:07.920
imagine, you know, like why they would have been running up and down that trail over to the water,
00:23:14.640
what contact would have looked like at that point, right? There's a lot of information and history out
00:23:19.440
there and stories that make it really compelling. So there's that kind of like more inquisitive angle.
00:23:24.880
And then, uh, so like learn more about the place that you're standing on. I think it's like a natural,
00:23:31.440
you don't have to be in Canada for that. Like, but then there's the action part to your point.
00:23:36.240
I actually don't see land acknowledgements as land acknowledgements anymore. I see them as like
00:23:40.720
statements of reconciliation. So you're acknowledging where you are. Great. But like, what are you doing
00:23:48.720
personally and like collectively in whatever institution that you represent, like, what are
00:23:54.560
you doing to contribute to the solution? Like I'm a huge, huge fan of results. I love your point that
00:24:01.440
you raised about, you know, we don't even have clean drinking water in these communities across the
00:24:05.920
country. Like what's up with that? That's, that's not okay. So why not use that opportunity to question,
00:24:13.120
to challenge, but also to commit to some sort of contribution to like moving ourselves in, in,
00:24:20.960
Well, that's a very well said, Karen. And, um, you know, I know you have to go, but I really
00:24:27.200
appreciate this, uh, great conversation with you. Um, uh, and you know, it was, uh, uh, a privilege to
00:24:34.560
get your insight into this very important topic, uh, on this third anniversary.
00:24:42.080
Um, sorry. I just want to raise a, like a, another point before we close.
00:24:47.520
I'd be curious to hear you mentioned at the beginning of your show
00:24:50.800
of the show that, um, the disparity between, um, Indigenous people in Canada versus immigrant
00:24:59.360
families and individuals. Um, that's a point that not a lot of people are talking about.
00:25:05.600
Uh, but it's certainly a point that myself and, you know, many cousins and I talk about from time
00:25:11.200
to time. Um, and it's something that we have taken note of and we question and challenge ourselves to
00:25:18.000
determine why is that. Right. Um, but that said, you know, there's no data and there's a whole other
00:25:25.200
issue around like data sovereignty and questions around collecting data about Indigenous people.
00:25:33.360
So yes, there, there are disparities and yes, you know, we, we were challenged to kind of turn ourselves
00:25:39.280
around within a generation or two, if you were to draw a comparator to immigrant families.
00:25:44.160
Um, but at the same time, qualitatively, I think you look around and you can see
00:25:52.160
a lot of Indigenous people who are, you know, stepping into their place in society.
00:26:01.440
And what I'm seeing particularly with the generation that are in their twenties right now,
00:26:06.160
they were raised by parents who made it okay for them. There was, there was no shame in being
00:26:16.640
Indigenous, right? Like that generation, the, the 20 year olds and the teens today, it's parents who
00:26:22.800
are in their thirties and forties who now understand the shame that was caused by the church and state
00:26:28.240
and have fundamentally rejected that and on it and are walking through the world very proudly to be
00:26:33.760
who they are as Anishinaabe, as Indigenous people. And you can imagine what it's like to be raised by
00:26:40.240
that messaging. And so that's what we're seeing in teens and 20 year olds today, very strongly rooted
00:26:45.760
and positioned in their identity and proud. Uh, but also equipping themselves with tools, you know,
00:26:53.840
like sure university degrees, but like, you know, trade certification or whatnot and really kind of
00:27:00.560
trucking forward, um, and reclaiming, you know, a place, uh, within their communities, um, and really
00:27:07.840
moving things and a pretty awesome direction. So I'm with you, there are disparities, but I'm a huge fan
00:27:14.800
of looking at the flip side of things. What, you know, what improvements, what steps forward, what
00:27:20.400
advancements are we making? And I'm seeing, I'm, I'm really encouraged about it. Like we're making
00:27:25.680
strides here. No, that's, uh, thank you for, um, um, giving us that perspective. That should have been
00:27:31.440
one of my questions to you, actually. Maybe you should do the show, but, uh, uh, but that is, that is a
00:27:38.160
very valuable perspective because what is the current, uh, how are young Indigenous, uh, people doing these
00:27:45.200
days? Well, you know, what are they thinking of how, how do they see themselves in this world? Where
00:27:49.760
do they see their future? And these are very, very important questions. And yes, I mean, the data show
00:27:54.480
that, um, uh, Indigenous communities, uh, fare poorly on a range of socioeconomic indicators relative to
00:28:01.600
other groups, including immigrants. But there is also, there's also a lot of hope within this community,
00:28:06.880
as you point out. And that's, uh, that's, that's very important. And, uh, thank you for, uh, sharing that with
00:28:13.120
us and I'm heartened. I'm hoping that this gap will close in, you know, in a generation or two or
00:28:19.520
perhaps even less. Um, and, uh, and, and, you know, and then we won't be having these kinds of
00:28:26.240
conversations hopefully, but, uh, but thank you so much, Karen. And, uh, I really hope to have you
00:28:31.840
again soon and, uh, really, uh, enjoyed this conversation and for sharing your perspective with us.