UPDATE: Court orders $66,000 more in fines against Aylmer’s Church of God
Episode Stats
Words per minute
190.66953
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Summary
This week, the Church of God in Elmer, Ontario is back in court facing more fines and findings of contempt from the Ontario government. They argue that the church should be allowed to practice their faith in an outdoor location, and Pastor Henry Hildebrandt argues that this is a violation of the Canadian Charter right to assemble. In this episode of the Andrew Lawton Show, we talk to Lisa LeBoyle, a lawyer with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, about the latest court proceedings.
Transcript
00:00:09.980
Another day in Canada, which means still more attempts by government,
00:00:15.140
specifically in Ontario, to go after churches for wanting to assemble
00:00:19.600
as the Constitution guarantees and as their faiths have commanded them to for generations.
00:00:25.720
Most notably, we see this happening in Elmer, Ontario,
00:00:30.400
We've had the pastor there, Pastor Henry Hildebrandt, on the show in the past.
00:00:34.720
And this week, the Church of God was back in court again at the behest of the Ontario government,
00:00:40.900
trying to impose more penalties, more findings of contempt.
00:00:44.760
And the judge, after a relatively short hearing,
00:00:47.420
had actually imposed tens of thousands of dollars more in fines on the church and on its pastor.
00:00:53.940
Representing them has been Elisa Bildy, a lawyer with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms,
00:00:58.840
Lisa, good to have you back. Thanks for coming on today.
00:01:03.260
So this was, I mean, as far as the long-standing back and forth we've seen on this case,
00:01:09.720
was there anything particularly unique about this hearing,
00:01:13.000
or was it just, you know, another round of fines?
00:01:15.180
Well, it was a little bit different in that it feels like things are maybe settling down a little bit.
00:01:23.360
And even though we were back in court on, you know, contempt proceedings,
00:01:30.980
the government made sure to tell the court all about all the transgressions
00:01:37.540
telling about any other subsequent services that had happened since they had filed their motion.
00:01:43.380
And I thought that was interesting, and I noted it in court,
00:01:45.980
that basically when they had their service on May 16th,
00:01:50.660
which is what we were talking about in the contempt proceedings today,
00:02:00.620
And so it seems like, as a public health measure,
00:02:06.940
the more people want to turn up and show their support.
00:02:10.100
And so, you know, I think it's interesting that it felt a little bit more subdued this time.
00:02:15.240
And I do hope that, especially as we're moving into the summer
00:02:17.960
and things are starting to open up a little bit more, hopefully,
00:02:21.260
and more outdoor services are going to be permitted in the near future,
00:02:25.260
that the temperature will be turned down on all of this.
00:02:28.680
I know it came up at the hearing a week and a half ago,
00:02:32.140
which ultimately was the one that was adjourned to today.
00:02:34.740
And the judge had mentioned, you know, there's not much more that can be done.
00:02:40.240
but if the church is going to keep continuing to assemble
00:02:43.360
and having these services, which are now outdoor,
00:02:48.400
So in a lot of ways, is the government kind of conceding?
00:02:52.840
but is the government conceding that this is sort of just going to be this repetitive process?
00:02:57.920
And that might be why, as you've just said, it's losing a bit of steam?
00:03:04.240
but they also could escalate things and they could make this criminal contempt
00:03:09.160
and they could seek to have the pastor put in jail.
00:03:12.160
But I think probably most people recognize now,
00:03:22.840
And in fact, probably triggers more people to say,
00:03:26.880
Is this really a public health crisis or is there something else going on?
00:03:33.420
One comment the judge made at the hearing that stood out was that
00:03:45.500
there are consequences that must flow from that.
00:03:48.000
And that to me seems to reinforce what you've said in court in the past,
00:03:51.840
which is that the government does really seem to be targeting this particular church.
00:03:56.980
I mean, we've learned of rallies that have been taking place elsewhere
00:04:00.080
for any number of causes that have not raised the ire of the state,
00:04:03.320
but they are continuing or have been up until this week
00:04:06.380
to really devote a disproportionate amount of energy
00:04:09.760
on this particular church and this particular pastor.
00:04:19.840
and in the affidavit that I had quickly scrambled to put together
00:04:23.100
at the last minute before the hearing when they first,
00:04:26.280
the government had brought this, we talked about this in your last show,
00:04:29.180
the government had brought a motion the morning of the court date
00:04:35.340
So I had thrown together an affidavit that had some articles
00:04:41.340
And of course, those aren't subject to court order,
00:04:43.320
but the reason they're not subject to court order
00:04:50.180
But they have done that with a couple of the churches.
00:04:54.580
and so I didn't raise them in my submissions today,
00:04:57.040
but, you know, the judge isn't interested in hearing
00:04:59.940
about, you know, what's going on with other protests.
00:05:14.940
because really it's kind of an open and shut case.
00:05:24.260
And I think it's relevant to the broader question
00:05:34.080
we can't have certain rules applying to some people
00:06:57.340
Are those locks automatically going to come off?
00:07:32.280
for allowing them to return inside their building.