Juno News - May 14, 2025


Vassy GRILLS Carney, Poilievre BLASTS Carney’s cabinet picks


Episode Stats


Length

24 minutes

Words per minute

193.80086

Word count

4,779

Sentence count

291

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Jasmine Lane is a political news commentator and the host of the Overopinionated Podcast. She joins Candice to talk about the chaos that was yesterday's press conference in which Prime Minister Mark Carney announced his new cabinet, which is basically the exact same as the Trudeau cabinet.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show. We have a great episode for you
00:00:05.920 today, folks. You probably saw the Circus the Clown Show in Ottawa yesterday. Prime Minister
00:00:10.460 Mark Carney was out with his new, shiny new cabinet, which happened to be basically the
00:00:15.320 exact same as the Justin Trudeau cabinet. We're going to go through all of it, including the
00:00:19.180 legacy media doing what they do, spinning and twisting the truth to try to promote their man,
00:00:24.520 Mark Carney. I'm very pleased today to be joined by one of my favorite guests on The Candace
00:00:27.880 Malcolm Show, talking about Jasmine Lane. Jasmine is a political news commentator and the host of
00:00:33.060 the over-opinionated podcast. Jasmine, great to have you on the show today.
00:00:37.520 Thank you so much for having me. Lots to talk about.
00:00:40.560 As usual, yes. Okay, so the news was Carney announced a new smaller cabinet, 28 minister
00:00:46.140 cabinet, and yes, more than half of them were drawn from Justin Trudeau's cabinet. Check out this piece
00:00:51.960 by Juno News. I love this headline. These ministers wrecked Canada, and Carney just promoted all of them.
00:00:57.880 And so you will see a lot of similar names that we saw that we lived through with Justin Trudeau.
00:01:03.380 I will just name a few. So Dominic LeBlanc is going to be the Minister of Trade,
00:01:08.540 Melanie Jolie, the Ministry of Industry, Francois-Philippe Champagne, the Minister of Finance,
00:01:13.720 Anita Nand, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Patty Hajdu, Minister of Jobs and Families,
00:01:18.060 Stephen Gilbeau, Minister of Canadian Identity, Culture and Official Languages,
00:01:22.240 Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice, Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Transport and Internal Trade,
00:01:28.820 many, many of the same names. I could go on. There's a few newcomers. We have Evan Solomon,
00:01:34.060 who is the newly named Minister of Artificial Intelligence. Also Gregor Robertson, who is a
00:01:39.560 former hard left socialist mayor of Vancouver, who's going to be the Minister of Housing and
00:01:45.660 Infrastructure. My colleague over at True North, Sue Ann Levy, pointed out that the new Minister of
00:01:51.860 Immigration, well, she calls her a Jew hater. Oh my goodness. Lina Metleg-Diab, Sue Ann Levy says,
00:01:59.160 very nice to see Mark Carney installed this woman of Lebanese descent who hates Israel.
00:02:03.500 And then she clarified, because at first she said that she signed this Vote Palestine
00:02:07.000 platform, calling for basically the obliteration of Israel. She apologized, saying that she didn't sign
00:02:12.680 that one, but she did vote against, or she voted for an arms embargo against Israel. Same difference.
00:02:19.300 So yikes. But I don't know, when it comes to what we should expect from this government,
00:02:25.180 I think it really does just seem like a continuation of Justin Trudeau from, you know, open borders and
00:02:31.920 mass immigration in that category, you know, promoting Sean Fraser, who was, you know, sort of the
00:02:39.600 disastrous housing and immigration minister and putting him in there. It just really just seems
00:02:44.340 like doubling down on the same failed approaches. What was your take from this yesterday, Jasmine?
00:02:49.220 You know, obviously, a lot of people failed upwards, which doesn't typically happen in real life. But
00:02:54.960 there were so many things. And it's one of those, it's such a jarring difference in the, you know,
00:03:00.340 Canadian ministers, if you want to go and compare them to other nations, where there are quite
00:03:05.800 literally people who are, for lack of better words, career politicians, and not the good kind that are
00:03:12.700 actually trying to help you, but the kind to do it for the money, for the most part, is kind of what I
00:03:18.800 can, what I can see. You know, it's just bizarre. I mean, if you even want to want to think about Evan
00:03:24.720 Solomon, if you recall, there was that viral post from the bus that was created by AI that he reshared.
00:03:32.480 And now, of course, he is the AI minister. When, you know, his background, what is he? He's a former
00:03:39.980 journalist. He got fired from CBC after an art dealing with Mark Carney. He then...
00:03:47.940 That's an important point. I just want to zoom in on that one for a minute, because folks might not
00:03:51.780 remember this. Evan Solomon was sort of a mainstream, mainstay CBC journalist. He was the one that hosted
00:03:57.360 Power and Politics and interviewed all of the cabinet ministers. He was always, you could tell,
00:04:01.940 he was a partisan liberal, but back then he pretended to be a journalist. And he got fired
00:04:05.660 in disgrace for basically selling art, like being the middleman in peddling art to get big commissions
00:04:12.100 to the people that he was interviewing. The main person that was in a lot of headlines was Jim
00:04:18.080 Basile, one of the founders of BlackBerry at the time, one of the wealthiest Canadians. But one of the
00:04:22.480 other people involved in that scandal was none other than Mark Carney. Mark Carney himself was one of the
00:04:27.640 people that Evan Solomon was dealing art to behind the scenes, kind of in conflict
00:04:32.360 of the CBC's ethics policies. And then get this, Jasmine, when he was fired in disgrace, he, I guess,
00:04:39.560 again, failed upwards. But he got involved with the Eurasia Group, where Mark Carney's wife is involved.
00:04:45.640 She works there. And where Mark Carney's advisor, Gerald Butts, who's Justin Trudeau's best friend,
00:04:50.040 also worked there. So they're all involved in this risk consultant management, global finance company
00:04:56.600 or think tank called Eurasia Group. And Evan Solomon was the publisher of this magazine that
00:05:04.920 they had internally. So really just like a very much like an insider's web in this sort of globalist
00:05:11.480 world. But really, really interesting that he's kind of considered outsider in this cabinet.
00:05:16.280 Angela Brown I don't want to go off too much. But just flashing back to even just his skills and
00:05:22.040 being the AI minister, he's never even worked in the tech industry. He was a fired journalist for,
00:05:29.640 essentially, in terms of art commissions, insider trading, basically. And then if you just compare
00:05:35.160 that to Donald Trump's team and who David Sachs is, and he's the guy who's in charge of all of the
00:05:41.160 AIs their AIs are. And he helped build PayPal. He's done so many things, had so much success
00:05:48.680 when it comes to tech entrepreneurship in comparison. And then you have Evan Solomon.
00:05:53.720 It's like, wow, Canada just has some of the most underqualified people that exist in our parliament.
00:05:59.240 And it just makes absolutely no sense to me. And I really do think this is something so many of us
00:06:04.360 have been talking about and speculating on for quite some time. But in terms of Mark Carney's cabinet,
00:06:10.200 it's just filled and even just Mark Carney as a whole and the people, the company that he keeps,
00:06:14.360 you know, you have this issue that happens with Evan Solomon. And then all of a sudden,
00:06:17.880 he starts working for the Eurasia Group. Why would he do that? I wonder why he would do that? Like,
00:06:22.360 think about that, right? And then Oh, just kidding. I'm, I'm actually gonna now jump into politics for the
00:06:28.200 first time in my life, win by a landslide. And now I'm a minister. It's just, you know, and I have no,
00:06:34.520 I have no shade at all. And people who are first time ministers, of course, everybody starts from
00:06:38.040 somewhere. But my goodness, at the very least, I would like for you to have some sort of past
00:06:42.600 expertise in the areas of which you are ministering. So when it comes to this entire cabinet, it's just,
00:06:51.080 it really is just to me, it's rewarding a lot of people 50% roughly, of which have have failed and
00:06:58.920 have done a really bad job. And you know, another detail there too, as Mark Carney had said that he
00:07:03.960 wanted 50% of his cabinet to be female 50% to be male. And I'm just personally kind of over that,
00:07:10.440 you know, like, don't get me wrong, there's plenty of incredibly capable women. However, 50% of them, 1.00
00:07:17.000 I'm sure not every single one of them is absolutely qualified for the positions of
00:07:20.520 which they were promoted to. And I'm just really over that type of hiring. And I think that that type
00:07:25.000 of promotion and rewarding is what has gotten Canada into such a mess. Because, you know,
00:07:30.440 our government for many, many years now has prioritized DEI standards over people who are
00:07:36.920 just really good at their job. 100%. I mean, this was one of the downfalls of the Trudeau government is
00:07:42.280 that they were obsessed with putting out these like gender balanced budgets, everything had to be
00:07:46.440 looked through a gendered lens or wasting their time on this nonsense. Meanwhile, the real issues 0.85
00:07:50.920 of the country are being neglected. And in many ways, they're throwing gasoline on the fire. And
00:07:55.480 yes, when Justin Trudeau announced that 50% of his cabinet will be women, it was the women,
00:08:00.840 by and large, that ended up basically a lot of them getting fired and getting thrown under the bus
00:08:06.120 and not being properly qualified for the roles in the first place. And that was part of
00:08:11.080 the damage of Justin Trudeau. Okay, well, here is Mark Carney speaking yesterday outside of Rideau Hall.
00:08:16.120 He told reporters that his government will deliver its mandate for change. This is what change looks
00:08:21.160 like according to our Prime Minister. Let's play that clip. Our government will deliver its mandate
00:08:27.320 for change with urgency and determination. We're going to deliver that mandate with a new team,
00:08:35.960 purpose built for this hinge moment in Canada's history. Now, to her credit, CTV's Vashi Capellos
00:08:43.560 grilled Mark Carney, basically saying, you know, these are the same people that you had that we saw
00:08:50.600 under Justin Trudeau. So let's play that clip. Even when you point to the experience of those who are in
00:08:55.960 the sort of biggest roles, the reason why I highlight them is because they were at the forefront of the
00:09:01.880 decisions that the previous government made. I disagree with that. They were. I mean,
00:09:05.080 Melanie Jolie, Francois-Philippe Champagne, he led the industrial policy. Now he'll be in charge
00:09:09.400 of finance. Dominic LeBlanc led a lot of those files as well. We are used to hearing from them
00:09:14.680 justifying and explaining the decisions that Justin Trudeau made. So now we're going to hear from them
00:09:18.840 again. Well, first off, now you're hearing from me. I'm a new Prime Minister. I'm the 24th Prime Minister
00:09:23.240 of Canada. I've got a very clear set of objectives, which I laid out in the course of my initial
00:09:29.480 government from that cabinet table, cancelled the carbon tax right there. I mean, there were
00:09:33.560 so many differences. As I say, half of the cabinet is different, big change in terms of priorities,
00:09:39.320 big change in terms of speed. This is one of the fastest swearing in in Canadian history. It will be
00:09:45.560 one of the fastest returns in Parliament in Canadian history. I like how he wants credit for moving things
00:09:51.960 along so that he can very quickly, very hastily move through his agenda. You know, he got sworn in the
00:09:57.240 first time as Prime Minister. It took him a week or two to actually trigger an election, which he
00:10:02.200 should have done immediately. But he wanted to get a few trips into Europe under his belt before he called
00:10:06.920 an election. And he called the shortest election period possible. So he's out there looking for
00:10:11.880 points and expecting to be patted on the back by the legacy media. Well, we'll get to the fact that CBC
00:10:16.120 actually did pat him on the back and they do repeat him, his talking points. But it was nice to see
00:10:21.720 CTV's Vassie Capello's kind of push back on the nonsense a little bit. And it's always amusing to
00:10:26.280 see how Mark Carney reacts when he gets a journalist with a bit of a backbone. You know, he clearly
00:10:31.800 doesn't like he doesn't like the line of questioning there. What did you make of it?
00:10:35.640 Oh, gosh, I mean, I just it is so disappointing to me to see the way that Mark Carney talks over
00:10:42.280 people when he doesn't like what they're saying. I think that that is, oh, you know, people will say,
00:10:45.800 well, he's not a politician. And it's like, yeah, that's so great. You actually don't have to be a
00:10:49.240 politician to actually just be a decent human being. But it is really fascinating to me to
00:10:54.760 see him and just how frequently he will interrupt to try to course correct without even letting
00:10:59.720 people finish their thoughts. That's something that I just I dislike so much whenever I see it,
00:11:04.600 doesn't matter what party is doing it. And I will say it's it was quite laughable, even Mark Carney
00:11:11.480 being like, oh, well, you're hearing it from me now. It's like, OK, cool. That doesn't make a
00:11:16.440 difference at all. I don't care if we're hearing it from you. You are the same party. You have like
00:11:21.560 50 percent of the exact same ministers. This is the exact same team. So, yeah, you deserve to be
00:11:28.200 questioned and called out, especially in terms of all of these people who who you decided to stick
00:11:33.560 with when they do have failed track records. And, you know, I think that I think that Mark Carney
00:11:39.240 could have had a much better likability, maybe even thrown some conservatives for a bit of a loop
00:11:45.240 had he had he actually made some of those big changes. And I think there if there's anything
00:11:49.800 at all that we can tell, it's that there's no big changes. He's going to keep telling us that
00:11:54.040 there are, but they're just simply are not. Right. Well, this is something that conservative
00:11:59.240 leader Pierre Polio pointed out. Here is a clip of him reacting to Carney's cabinet picks, basically
00:12:05.320 highlighting the failed record of the ministers that Mark Carney has just promoted. Let's play that clip.
00:12:11.320 The first disappointment is, unfortunately, his cabinet. He appointed Trudeau's old team and
00:12:17.880 Trudeau's old advisers. Stephen Gilbeau, whose radical green agenda would shut down all future
00:12:23.960 developments in our resource industry, is still the minister responsible for Quebec. Sean Frazier
00:12:31.480 is the immigration minister who caused the immigration crisis, the housing minister who gave us the housing
00:12:37.800 crisis. And now he's the minister responsible for addressing the liberal crime crisis. It seems like
00:12:44.520 he is the master at failing upward. Then there's Francois-Philippe Champagne, Trudeau's minister of
00:12:50.200 everything, who never really managed to do anything. Then there's Jolie, Leblanc, Haidu, Annan. Annan was the
00:12:58.520 president of the secretary of the Treasury Board, during which time the bureaucracy and the consultant
00:13:04.200 bills blew out of control. In all, 14 Trudeau ministers are now in Carney's cabinet. It's more of
00:13:11.240 the same when Canada needs real change.
00:13:15.240 Poliev doing what he should do. He's the opposition minister. Now, you pointed this out on X, Jasmine. You write this
00:13:21.560 in two minutes. CBC insults Pierre Poliev, mocks him, defends Carney's cabinet picks, and reminds us how
00:13:27.800 biased they are. Let's play, I don't know if we have the whole clip, but let's play this clip and you can
00:13:33.240 point out your favorite parts of it.
00:13:35.480 Cabinet is broken, is essentially what he said. He is no longer Canada's broken. He's saying this cabinet is not changed.
00:13:41.240 A silent approach for Mr. Poliev, Rosie, that would suggest it's almost as if he won the election, rather
00:13:47.160 than lost the election and lost his own seat. You know, talking about how he's going to stand there
00:13:53.240 in defense of Canadians. He'll only be able to stand there, actually in the chamber behind him,
00:13:58.280 because of the goodwill of the prime minister who's going to call an early by-election for Mr. Poliev,
00:14:04.360 so he can run in one of his MP seats in Alberta at the cost of close to two million dollars to have a
00:14:09.560 by-election, all while he stays in Stornoway throughout this. So it's interesting that
00:14:13.880 given that sequence of events and given those series of factors, that it was that kind of approach
00:14:18.360 and response to things there from Mr. Poliev. Going after Stephen Gilbo, talking of the radical
00:14:23.960 environmental agenda, blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, which is, Sean Frazier's,
00:14:30.440 I don't think he's 40 yet, or he's just 40. I don't think he caused the housing crisis in Canada.
00:14:34.760 There's a whole bunch of layers and effects of that. But, you know, wanting to fight the same
00:14:39.960 political battles we've just endured during the five weeks of the campaign and for the two years
00:14:43.400 leading up to that. Now, I get that the CBC is mostly funded by taxpayers, and that is mostly
00:14:49.960 because of the Liberal government, who keeps doubling down and increasing their budget. But the CBC hosts
00:14:55.240 don't have to act like they work for the Liberal Party of Canada. Like, it's okay for them to at least
00:14:59.800 pretend to be moderate. They don't even try. I mean, David Cochran there sounds like Mark
00:15:05.800 Kearney's press secretary. It sounds like he's out there just towing the party line and defending
00:15:10.840 his team. What are your comments? Oh, boy, do I ever have a lot.
00:15:17.640 First and foremost, you know, it's fascinating to hear the deflection of, oh, well, you know,
00:15:21.800 Sean Frazier, he's only 40, so he definitely didn't cause that crisis. And you have Rosemary
00:15:27.160 Barton. No, probably not. It's like, okay, well, so if ministers have no involvement and no
00:15:32.760 accountability when things go wrong, and if you look at the data from when they were hired and
00:15:37.000 assigned to certain portfolios and the downward trend that has existed, but if they can't be
00:15:42.280 held accountable and they, according to CBC, have absolutely no influence, why are they ministers?
00:15:47.800 Why do we have any of those positions to begin with? If that's the case, then maybe we should just
00:15:51.640 have a prime minister and everybody else is just a waste of taxpayer dollars. So they kind of bit
00:15:56.680 themselves with that one because it just doesn't make logical sense. But whatever, you know,
00:16:01.800 deflect, defame, and defend at all costs. I'm also wondering if David Cochran plans to
00:16:09.640 complain as much about the by-election in Terrebonne, which is due to the Elections Canada issue,
00:16:16.600 as he has been complaining about the by-election in Battle River Crowfoot with Pierre Polyevre.
00:16:21.800 I won't hold my breath for that one, but there's just so many things about this where the bias is
00:16:26.920 so unreal, and it's okay to have a bias. We all do. We're human beings. But when you work for,
00:16:31.960 you know, the public broadcaster, essentially, and you present news as though you don't have a bias
00:16:39.320 and then proceed to tell everybody what your bias is and everything that you do and say,
00:16:43.960 it's just very disingenuous, it's misleading, and I'm quite tired of it. And myself as well,
00:16:50.360 you know, I worked in mainstream media for 11 years of my career before going independent,
00:16:55.000 and I absolutely believe that the CBC should be defunded. I don't want to see people lose their
00:17:00.360 jobs, but I want them to be defunded for reasons like this, where it is, it's not honest at all.
00:17:06.600 And it's just very disappointing, and it's no wonder why so many Canadians have no idea how the
00:17:12.760 political system works, because clips like this go viral, and people share them, and people do watch.
00:17:17.960 It's a low percentage, but they do. And it just, you know, to sit there and mock kind of the role of
00:17:24.920 the leader of the opposition, like, I'm sorry, so what do you want him to do then? You want Pierre
00:17:28.760 Polyevre to be the prime minister? That would make sense, because you're very supportive of all of
00:17:32.920 Carney's ideas that he's taken from Mr. Polyevre. But it just, there's so many people out there who,
00:17:39.400 they have a lot to say, a lot of opinions, and they actually have no idea what the roles of a
00:17:44.440 minister, of a prime minister, of a premier, of a mayor, like, they just don't actually understand
00:17:50.040 the levels there. And that's fine. I don't blame them. It's confusing, and it's a lot to understand.
00:17:54.440 But when it comes to CBC, I am just, I'm starting to get very tired of them.
00:18:00.360 Amy Quinton Well, it's so true that the role of the
00:18:02.920 official opposition is to criticize the government. That is your job. And Pierre Polyevre,
00:18:06.600 actually, in his speech, if we had played a longer bit, you know, he said, look, I am going to stand
00:18:11.640 with the government when I believe in what they're doing is right. You know, if I agree with the
00:18:15.640 approach they're taking to defending Canada national security, I will come out and say it.
00:18:19.240 However, when they make big mistakes, when they, you know, do things that harm the economy,
00:18:23.960 harm the health of the market, I'm going to be there to hold them accountable. And to me, it was
00:18:28.840 David Cockburn. I mean, sure. I would probably prefer it if he just came out and said, look,
00:18:32.120 everyone, you know, you probably could tell by the way that I talk, but I do vote liberal. I love the
00:18:36.120 Liberal Party of Canada. I have, you know, I have the party card in my pocket, right? Whatever he's
00:18:41.960 going to say, I would actually have a bit more respect for him than that. And I would maybe question
00:18:46.120 why the CBC would have like four card carrying members of the Liberal Party who host all of their
00:18:50.840 shows. But, you know, that's kind of a conversation for the day. It's like, at the end of the day,
00:18:55.000 though, like you're on the public broadcaster. Your job is to report the news to Canadians.
00:18:59.400 Why the snark, right? Why does he have to go, you know, oh, there's Pierre Polyev who lost his
00:19:04.280 own seat. He's acting like he won, but he actually lost his own seat. And like later in the broadcast
00:19:09.720 as well, they were talking about how he should really be showing some gratitude to Mark Carney
00:19:14.040 because Mark Carney is allowing him to have a by-election. You know, he didn't have to do that.
00:19:18.120 Yeah, exactly. Mark Carney didn't have to let Pierre Polyev have a seat back in the House of
00:19:24.200 Commons. Like he's he's the king. He's the monarch now. He has utter control over everything. So he
00:19:29.080 could have he could. Yeah. Okay, fine. He could have blocked Mark Carney, Pierre Polyev from having
00:19:33.800 a seat. He could have said, we're not going to do a by-election until September. But he would have had
00:19:37.960 so much pushback and criticism on him. And then same thing that, yes, I guess, according to the
00:19:44.040 official rules, Pierre Polyev shouldn't be living in Stornoway. Stornoway is the home of the official
00:19:49.240 opposition, which is a role in parliament. Right. And technically, Pierre Polyev is not the leader of
00:19:54.840 the official opposition right now because he's not a parliamentarian. Once he has a by-election,
00:19:58.280 he gets a seat back, then he will become it. So technically, Mark Carney could have evicted him
00:20:02.520 from Stornoway. He could have had him move out for the summer. And then as soon as by-election happened,
00:20:07.000 he could have moved back in. But that would have been incredibly petty, first of all, and incredibly
00:20:10.920 costly to taxpayers. So the CBC wants to give Carney credit for these really trivial things.
00:20:17.320 And they want to criticize Pierre Polyev for, again, very trivial things. I was critical of the
00:20:22.040 party. I was critical of Polyev's team for allowing him to lose his seat in Carleton. I think that they
00:20:26.280 could have done a lot more to make sure that he got that seat because it was quite embarrassing for
00:20:29.720 him to lose that seat. But there's the CBC really putting salt in the wounds, rubbing it in. Oh,
00:20:37.480 it's going to cost $2 million of taxpayer money for this by-election. So Pierre Polyev, you should
00:20:42.920 like be apologizing for that. Like just everything about that segment and that piece is just like
00:20:47.560 the epitome of why like half the country hates the CBC and why they just absolutely need to be
00:20:52.840 defunded. It really blows my mind, too, because at the end of the day, when it comes to details like
00:20:57.880 that, you know, it's one thing to criticize somebody because they spent, you know, millions of taxpayer
00:21:02.840 dollars funding somewhere in, you know, Aruba, how how beneficial it would be to eat bugs.
00:21:10.040 But it's another thing to criticize a party because the taxpayers are funding for democracy. Like,
00:21:18.440 wasn't that what you kept telling us the conservatives and Donald Trump was going to take away?
00:21:22.920 Oh, OK, weird. And, you know, at the end of the day, I really, truly I just like to try to flip the
00:21:29.160 script, you know, like, hmm. Well, I wonder what they would say if Pierre Polyev had won the election
00:21:35.240 and Mark Carney was now moving out of Canada again because he had no interest to actually be here
00:21:40.360 because none of his business is here. I wonder how they would then try to defend it because these types
00:21:45.480 of things, it really is. It's such a nothing sandwich. It is. And and it's just these there's so
00:21:51.560 many weak points that have no merit that, you know, are are very loose in how they are described.
00:21:58.920 They're very misleading that people, particularly the left, go off of to try to insult the conservatives.
00:22:05.560 And the only thing that ever comes to mind for me whenever I hear things like that is, number one,
00:22:10.920 you're mean and I probably wouldn't have been friends with you in high school. And number two,
00:22:14.920 you literally have nothing to go off of here. Like, you don't like you have so little to go off of to
00:22:20.440 try to push out Supreme Leader Mark Carney that you have to go and criticize democracy in Canada
00:22:27.960 and promote. Oh, wow. He's so great for allowing that to happen. It's like, what? Duh. Like, it's
00:22:34.920 just it's such a nothing sandwich. And it's just very frustrating to hear on the daily. And I have
00:22:42.200 also noticed, I don't know if you have, that CBC, they they've always been left leaning. I would say
00:22:47.640 they've been particularly left leaning since probably like 1997, roughly. Then they were a
00:22:52.520 little bit more central. And then when Justin Trudeau was running against Stephen Harper,
00:22:58.520 similar to this election, Harper had said that he was going to be cutting some of their funding.
00:23:02.360 And Justin Trudeau said he was going to be increasing it. And we saw the tides turn with how
00:23:06.200 they reported that should be a wake up call to anybody. But then with this election campaign and with
00:23:11.880 how hard Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives were saying we should defund them, I certainly noticed
00:23:17.560 just a newfound confidence of CBC broadcasters to push out as much smear as they can, to push out as
00:23:26.920 much narrative as they can. And it's been really disappointing and just gross. I don't know how else
00:23:32.600 to explain it to witness. Well, it's true. It's like they're feeding their base, right? They know that the
00:23:37.320 base of the Liberal Party is the same as the viewers of the CBC. And they actually love it when they go
00:23:43.400 low and they take cheap shots at Polyev. And they're helping to further the partisan divide in this
00:23:50.520 country. It's sad, right? They watch Pierre Polyev and they just hate him. And so it's very easy for
00:23:55.960 them to point out all of his little flaws. And they don't realize that when they attack him, they're not
00:24:00.760 just attacking him, right? Because regular people in Canada who identify with Pierre Polyev and like
00:24:06.600 him, they also feel like they're being attacked when the CBC does this routine. And you're right,
00:24:11.480 they do it all the time. Okay, folks, we are going to be back. We're going to take a little break. And
00:24:15.480 then we're going to do another segment with Jasmine Lane. We're going to talk about election integrity.
00:24:19.880 We're going to talk about that seat that she just mentioned and the potential by-election that's
00:24:23.640 going to happen in Terrebonne, Quebec. So we will be right back for that one.