Juno News - November 24, 2025
Veteran association invites members to assisted suicide seminar
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
162.23418
Summary
A Royal Canadian Mounted Police Veterans Association is under fire from veterans after it invited members to learn about the government s assisted suicide program. The Liberal government has signaled that it will be launching new consultations to reintroduce failed censorship legislation. Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged over $1 billion in tax-funded spending to a global health fund for poorer countries.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
A Royal Canadian Mounted Police Veterans Association is under fire from veterans
00:00:08.860
after it invited members to learn about the government's assisted suicide program.
00:00:14.180
The Liberal government has signaled that it will be launching new consultations
00:00:20.440
Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged over $1 billion in tax-funded spending
00:00:27.400
Hello Canada, it's Monday, November 24th, and this is the True North Daily Brief.
00:00:34.860
We've got you covered with all the news you need to know.
00:00:37.100
Let's discuss the top stories of the day and the True North exclusives you won't hear anywhere else.
00:00:44.580
A National Police Association is facing intense backlash after it invited an advocate
00:00:49.260
to educate RCMP veterans on assisted suicide options.
00:00:53.000
A Canadian war veteran, podcaster, and long-time advocate for veterans' mental health,
00:00:57.960
Kelsey Sharon, put the Nova Scotia branch of the RCMP Veterans Association on blast
00:01:03.220
after a 32-year-old police veteran leaked an email.
00:01:06.580
The email advertised an assisted suicide talk to be hosted in an Anglican church.
00:01:11.000
The RCMP Veterans Association of Nova Scotia has sent an email out today and they are having
00:01:19.700
a doctor come into a local church to promote, push, and coerce veterans into assisted suicide.
00:01:32.120
I just had this leaked to me by a 32-year RCMP veteran who is absolutely livid and so should you.
00:01:38.900
There is an email address here and a phone number.
00:01:48.580
I would show up and ask why is it acceptable to be dangling a carrot in front of veterans
00:01:53.760
who already are struggling with mental health and now have a $4 billion deficit off of the new budget.
00:02:00.180
How is this supposed to help other than push people to self-select and kill themselves?
00:02:05.880
The email, sent out Thursday, was leaked to Sharon and published in a sub stack article she authored.
00:02:12.180
It invites members to a free, open to the public presentation that, quote,
00:02:16.400
may interest many and discusses the government's, quote, medical assistance in dying program.
00:02:22.400
The speaker is Dr. Gordon Gubitz, the clinical lead for Nova Scotia Health's assisted suicide program.
00:02:28.140
Gubitz also sits on the board for the Canadian Association of Maid Assessors and Providers,
00:02:32.680
the organization that, quote, developed the MAID curriculum for clinicians,
00:02:36.600
which frames government-approved suicide as a compassionate response to suffering and a therapeutic option.
00:02:42.700
Sharon said Gubitz was not a, quote, neutral, independent medical educator,
00:02:47.080
but a clinical gatekeeper for MAID and an ideological engine behind national MAID training.
00:02:54.780
quote, Nova Scotia RCMP veterans invited a man whose job is to facilitate, provide, and promote nothing but death
00:03:01.320
and whose organization teaches clinicians how to introduce MAID to patients who didn't ask for it, bring it up, or want it in their life.
00:03:10.980
So, Alex, how did the organizers and some of the pro-assisted suicide groups rationalize hosting this seminar to RCMP veterans?
00:03:35.780
The Canadian Association of MAID Assessors and Providers and the RCMP Veterans Association did not respond to Trunor's request for comments on this story here.
00:03:49.580
Please see the statement below from Helen Long, CEO of Dying with Dignity Canada.
00:03:54.720
While Dying with Dignity Canada is not associated with the presentation being held at St. John the Evangelist Anglican Church Parish with guest speaker Dr. Gordon Gubitz,
00:04:03.000
we believe it is important for people across Canada to be aware of all of their end-of-life options, including medical assistance in dying.
00:04:10.020
Canada has strict MAID eligibility and proper safeguards in place.
00:04:13.980
They also said that the event being shared is a free public event intended to share information to those who choose to attend.
00:04:21.440
Suggesting that an educational event is designed to target or coerce a specific audience is, at best, inaccurate, and at worst, irresponsible.
00:04:32.120
It is a decision made by free and informed individuals.
00:04:35.240
Nurse practitioners and physicians in Canada can discuss MAID in the context of end-of-life options,
00:04:39.460
but it is the individual who decides how to proceed once they have been given all their health care options.
00:04:45.080
Information about all health care matters should come from health care providers.
00:04:49.780
Decisions about health care, the organization continued, including MAID, are personal and individual.
00:04:56.300
I find that sort of strange because it does sound like these organizations,
00:05:02.060
if the educational seminars that they're providing aren't helping people access MAID,
00:05:08.560
then they really have no reason to exist in the first place.
00:05:11.100
So I think that there is some level of coercion going on here.
00:05:13.880
Otherwise, what would be the point of these events and these seminars?
00:05:17.780
So I find that a little bit disingenuous, personally.
00:05:23.300
The Liberals are once again attempting to pass their controversial censorship bill,
00:05:27.000
launching new consultations after multiple failed efforts to regulate online content.
00:05:31.260
Minister of Justice Sean Fraser told the Senate during question period
00:05:34.600
that the new online tarred legislation won't be a, quote, copy and paste of its previous two failed bills,
00:05:40.060
first introduced under the Trudeau government in 2021.
00:05:43.180
Adding that the Department of Canadian Heritage has been tasked with making the necessary, quote, reforms,
00:05:49.460
there is a consultation process that is now underway.
00:05:52.820
The government's previous attempts to regulate the Internet have been thwarted by significant
00:05:56.920
pushback from the general public and online content creators in particular.
00:06:01.980
Fraser's comments were in response to Senator Christopher Wells,
00:06:04.660
who said Canada still had much work to do in combating hate, in particular online.
00:06:08.940
Wells, a proponent of online regulation, said, quote,
00:06:11.480
In the previous parliament, the government tabled comprehensive legislation to combat online harms,
00:06:16.480
including hate speech through the creation of the new Digital Safety Commission.
00:06:19.900
Does the government remain committed to reintroducing legislation to combat online harms,
00:06:23.860
including the growing radicalization and proliferation of hate on the Internet and through social media?
00:06:28.860
While it may not be a, quote, cut and paste framework,
00:06:31.320
Fraser responded that Canadians should expect the Kearney government to, quote,
00:06:34.620
take action, unquote, to address many of the same issues from the previous proposed legislation.
00:06:40.560
So, Isaac, what were in those previous online censorship bills?
00:06:43.980
And what were some of the major concerns on those bills from civil liberties advocates?
00:06:47.880
Yeah, Alex. So when Sean Fraser talks about not doing a copy and paste bill,
00:06:53.360
what he's referring to are two earlier liberal attempts, Bill C-36 and Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act.
00:07:01.540
Bill C-36 was an earlier Trudeau-era proposal that would have created a kind of federal speech czar.
00:07:07.880
It envisioned a new official with powers to effectively block access to websites deemed harmful,
00:07:13.460
and it died on the order paper when the 2021 election was called.
00:07:17.300
The more recent and much bigger package was Bill C-63.
00:07:21.440
That bill tried to do several things at once, regulate large online platforms,
00:07:25.940
create a new Digital Safety Commission and related bureaucracy,
00:07:29.480
and at the same time rewrite both the Criminal Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act
00:07:34.340
to cover a wide range of harmful or hateful expression online.
00:07:38.200
Civil Liberties Group's main concern was that it didn't just go after clearly criminal material
00:07:45.260
like child exploitation or terrorism, it layered on vague new categories of speech offenses
00:07:53.300
For example, Bill C-63 would have required social media companies to remove broadly defined
00:07:58.860
harmful content or face steep penalties, which the Democracy Fund warned would push platforms
00:08:04.320
to over-censor and could amount to mass surveillance and censorship.
00:08:08.440
It also revived the old human rights hate speech regime, letting anyone file complaints over online
00:08:13.240
posts and empowering a tribunal to order content taken down and levy fines up to $70,000.
00:08:19.700
On top of that, the Criminal Code side of the bill was even more controversial.
00:08:23.460
Legal scholars like Michael Geist and Emily Laidlaw pointed out that ordinary offenses could
00:08:28.180
attract a potential life sentence if a judge found they were motivated by hate,
00:08:32.480
and that people could face restrictions based on being reasonably expected to commit a future
00:08:38.580
Critics said that comes perilously close to punishing people for what they might say in
00:08:46.800
The proposed Digital Safety Commission, Ombudsperson, and Office would have concentrated rulemaking,
00:08:52.820
enforcement, and quasi-judicial powers in a small group of government appointees.
00:08:56.940
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and other groups argued that letting one bureaucracy
00:09:01.480
write the rules, police them, and act as a judge and jury undermines basic checks and balances.
00:09:08.940
Finally, groups like the Democracy Fund, the Canadian Constitution Foundation, and public critics
00:09:14.680
from across the spectrum, including even Margaret Atwood, argued that much of what the bill
00:09:19.720
claimed to target is already covered by existing criminal law.
00:09:23.060
Their position has been, if there are genuine gaps around things like child exploitation,
00:09:27.120
those should be fixed narrowly, rather than using that concern as a vehicle for a much broader
00:09:34.860
And one thing I'll add is that this might be something that people remembered, but former
00:09:40.780
True North journalist Andrew Lawton asked Pierre Paliyev at a press conference about the hate
00:09:48.400
And Pierre said something along the lines of, are we really expecting people like Justin
00:09:57.320
And then he again referenced some comments Trudeau made during the convoy that were clearly,
00:10:03.180
clearly hate speech against anybody who is not trying to be coerced into taking a vaccine.
00:10:08.640
Taxpayers are on the hook for over $1 billion after Prime Minister Mark Carney pledged new funding
00:10:17.220
to a global health fund ahead of the G20 summit in South Africa.
00:10:20.280
The $1.02 billion commitment was announced Friday in Johannesburg by Cindy Timorjian,
00:10:29.640
The funds will support the Global Fund's programming from 2027 through 2029.
00:10:34.140
The Global Fund combats infectious diseases in the world's poorest countries by supplying
00:10:38.860
mosquito nets, diagnostics, and treatment for malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV.
00:10:45.480
Canada has supported the organization since its launch in 2002.
00:10:49.700
Canada's G20 visit follows a stop in the United Arab Emirates earlier this week where the federal
00:10:54.520
government announced a prospective $70 billion in future investments.
00:11:00.680
Instead, UAE officials pledged potential funding for Canadian critical minerals projects,
00:11:07.720
The $1.02 billion pledge aligns with Canada's historical support for global health efforts,
00:11:12.660
but comes as inflation, housing costs, and spending restraint remain key domestic political concerns.
00:11:19.260
Ottawa's continued international funding commitments have drawn criticism in light of federal program
00:11:25.740
So, Alex, how does Canada's contributions compare with those of other developed countries?
00:11:31.720
Well, first off, I'll preface this by just saying that I don't necessarily agree with this
00:11:35.760
sort of globalist organization funding, especially, as you mentioned, during a cost-of-lutid crisis
00:11:44.500
Canada's latest commitment of just over $1 billion, the Global Fund may sound enormous,
00:11:49.040
and frankly, it is, but it's actually not the biggest contribution.
00:11:54.520
The United States, historically speaking, was the largest contributor by far to these types
00:11:59.720
I believe they've contributed over $4 billion in the last round.
00:12:02.760
It's not clear if they're going to be contributing anything under the current administration in
00:12:07.840
Germany and the UK have also scaled down, despite being typically heavyweights in this area.
00:12:12.320
Canada, and so it looks as though, sadly, even though we struggle with things like healthcare
00:12:16.920
and housing in Canada, Canada is having to take a bit of an interventionist, I guess you could
00:12:22.000
say, approach on continuing to keep these organizations funded.
00:12:26.560
And I can see why that doesn't necessarily sit well with Canadian taxpayers at a time like this.
00:12:36.240
You can stay on top of new episodes every weekday by subscribing to The Daily Brief on iTunes
00:12:40.760
Also, while you're at it, make sure to hit us with a five-star rating and please leave