00:00:00.600All right, so look who we found. We're here with Eddie Cornell and Blair Ector, the lawyer and the man behind the lawsuit that was able, or the judicial review, that was able to get a judge to rule the invocation of the Emergencies Act unconstitutional.
00:00:14.220You guys are now taking the federal government to court and the banks as well to try and get damages.
00:00:19.520So take us through the whole process, beginning with the judicial review, Eddie, and why you wanted to do that, why you wanted to be involved in the leading of that, and now what you're looking forward to in the civil trial.
00:00:31.140Okay. It began while we were still at the convoy. We got involved with launching this lawsuit, JCCF and others, and Blair Ector and Bathsheba Vandenberg stepped up and became the attorneys for the lawsuit.
00:00:46.780And he'll be able to explain it a little better, but, you know, we scrambled really hard to get that lawsuit in before the government removed the emergency order.
00:00:57.260And I think something like eight minutes, about eight minutes. Otherwise, we would have had no shot.
00:01:03.380So with that win in mind, most Canadians didn't hear about it. It was really flying under the radar.
00:01:08.460Blair, Blair, and Bathsheba, they won that lawsuit, and that allowed us to pursue another lawsuit civilly, holding them accountable for what they did.
00:01:19.840And, Blair, why don't you explain sort of the legal aspect behind what you're now doing, which is this civil suit?
00:01:25.300Certainly, yeah. So with the Justice Mosley decision that came out on January 23rd,
00:01:28.940he declared that the Liberal government's usage of the Emergencies Act was unreasonable,
00:01:33.900and the economic order and the regulations that followed, which enabled them to freeze bank accounts for individuals such as Eddie Cornell,
00:01:41.500were found to be unconstitutional as well.
00:01:43.640So on the heels of that, and on the two-year anniversary of the invocation of the Emergencies Act,
00:01:48.260we filed a notice of action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice,
00:01:51.540where we are seeking damages against the members of Cabinet personally.
00:01:55.860So we have sued Trudeau, Lamedi, who was the Attorney Justice Minister at the time,
00:02:01.140and other members of Cabinet, in addition to the banks, and other individuals such as the police.
00:02:08.160We've sued as well the police, the Ottawa Police Service, and various other people who were responsible for this.
00:02:12.900I think all told, there's 28 defendants on there.
00:02:16.000And what we were trying to do here is to hold those who were involved in these unlawful orders
00:02:20.760and what we would consider tyrannical actions of government accountable for that,
00:02:24.720and that Canadians are going to stand up to this, and that we will oppose tyranny wherever we see it.
00:02:29.420And to make a point here, it's not even particularly about the Liberal government or who it was.
00:02:34.220It's the government of the day that did this.
00:02:35.500And if any government does this to its citizens, we will fight and we will oppose it.
00:02:39.280And we will oppose it vigorously, because that is not what Canada is,
00:02:42.540and that is not what we stand for as Canadians.
00:02:44.300And I think that the tide has shifted in this, and I think that, to my mind,
00:02:50.420there is no justification for what took place.
00:02:52.560To go extrajudicially with no oversight and have the police and bank basically act as the judge, jury,
00:02:58.980and executioner in freezing bank accounts, that's not how Canada works.
00:03:02.220And we are going to hold those who did that accountable.
00:03:04.100Now, you guys were telling me earlier about somebody involved in the lawsuit who had their bank account frozen,
00:03:11.060but wasn't actually a supporter of the Freedom Convoy, yet he still had his bank account frozen
00:03:15.920because he was a joint account holder with his father who was there.
00:03:19.020I mean, that just, I think, speaks to the unconstitutionality of the entire order.
00:03:23.520And the reality is that you guys aren't just doing it for the Freedom Convoy,
00:03:27.420but people who were collateral damage in a way, right?
00:03:30.340That's correct, yeah. A player can speak to that.
00:03:32.220Exactly. And I think this is an important story to get out to your viewers.
00:03:34.580So one of our clients, one of the plaintiffs, 17-year-old kid, not only did he not support the Freedom Convoy,
00:03:41.420he actually opposed the Freedom Convoy, was against the Freedom Convoy.
00:03:45.000But his dad went down to Ottawa, participated in the Freedom Convoy, and he was a joint account holder.
00:03:49.500His dad's bank account got frozen, and by proxy, our client got his account frozen, a 17-year-old.
00:03:54.740He went to go deposit his check back where he was working.
00:03:57.300Again, not in Ottawa, not supportive of it, in a completely different province at the time.
00:04:02.220And he couldn't even deposit his check. Couldn't even deposit his check.
00:04:04.600He was a 17-year-old kid at the time working in a kitchen just to make a living.