Juno News - May 24, 2022


WEF experts and elites want even more control

Topics
Guests
Mentioned
The WEF's climate agenda in their own words "Cabinet Confidentiality" is being used to hide the truth about the Emergencies Act

Episode Stats


Length

29 minutes

Words per minute

197.7

Word count

5,832

Sentence count

326

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

3

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

While global elites are hobnobbing in Davos, Switzerland this week, as part of the World Economic Forum s annual meeting, but criticizing these elites will get you called a conspiracy theorist, according to these elites. We re going to break it all down on the show today, with True North's Andrew Lawton, who s on the ground reporting from Davos.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Global elites are hobnobbing in Davos, Switzerland this week as part of the World Economic Forum's
00:00:04.980 annual meeting, but criticizing these elites, standing opposed to their global governance
00:00:09.660 schemes, will get you called a conspiracy theorist according to these elites. We're
00:00:15.160 going to break it all down on the show today. Plus, we'll be joined by True North's Andrew
00:00:18.480 Lawton, who's on the ground reporting in Davos. I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is The Candice
00:00:22.900 Malcolm Show.
00:00:30.000 Everyone, thank you so much for tuning into the program. It's great to have you here.
00:00:39.660 I hope everyone had a wonderful Victoria Day long weekend. Hope you got to spend lots and
00:00:44.400 lots of time with your family, with your friends. I got to spend some time with my family. I
00:00:49.000 love to unplug over these long weekends. I basically just turn my phone and computer off and soak
00:00:54.800 in as much time with my two little kids. I have a one-year-old and a three-year-old, and
00:00:59.480 it's just so much fun. Having little kids around is the funnest thing. My daughter, Georgia,
00:01:04.200 who is 18 months, is starting to talk. Her and her brother, they like to wrestle and play,
00:01:10.240 and it's just really, really fun to be a part of that and to get to really immerse yourself
00:01:16.040 with the kids. I like getting rid of all the technology, getting rid of all the devices,
00:01:20.600 to spend time with the family and the kids. It's really what it's all about. I want to talk
00:01:24.820 today about the World Economic Forum, about what's going on in Davos, because we're living
00:01:30.180 through this really interesting moment in time where we have this sort of expert class that
00:01:34.900 tells us everything that is good for us. We're ruled by these technocrats who truly believe
00:01:40.900 that they know better how to live our lives than we do. They sit there and they issue heavy-handed
00:01:46.260 edicts. They push heavy-handed rules. We've lived through some of the most heavy-handed authoritarian-like
00:01:52.100 rules in my lifetime, where the government had exerted so much control over what we can do.
00:01:57.460 I'm talking about the COVID pandemic, the restrictions that we all lived through. We
00:02:01.460 haven't seen anything like that in the West before, maybe since wartime, since the Second World War,
00:02:07.060 when there were Emergency Measures Act issue. And so what we're seeing, what we're experiencing,
00:02:14.100 is a backlash towards that. People don't like that. People don't like these technocratic experts
00:02:19.140 telling us what to do because lo and behold, the experts are often incorrect. What a surprise,
00:02:24.580 I know, this idea that experts can't actually run our lives better. And so I see a growing pushback
00:02:30.420 against this and it's not really a left-right thing anymore. It's more like more and more people just
00:02:35.300 don't want these arrogant, progressive, mostly left-leaning elites telling us, designing our lives,
00:02:42.420 telling us what's good for us, telling us that we're going to have to suffer, we're going to have to
00:02:45.860 sacrifice for some greater good that we don't see, especially when the underlying assumptions that
00:02:50.980 these elites are making are often wrong. And so we're seeing lots and lots of pushback against
00:02:55.860 this. I think the trucker convoy, that was what it was all about. But there's so many other instances
00:03:00.100 in society. You can look at Brexit, you can look at Trump. People don't like to be told what to do
00:03:05.300 by a group of out-of-touch elites. And nothing sort of exemplifies this attitude and this distinction
00:03:12.260 between the elites and everyone else better than what goes on every year in Davos, Switzerland,
00:03:17.220 a luxury ski resort in the Swiss Alps where the global elite gather and they have these
00:03:23.140 conversations out loud. They say the quiet part out loud. They talk about how they want to reset
00:03:27.460 the economy, how they want to redesign the way that we live our lives. They want capitalism to be
00:03:33.140 infused with their woke ideology. They want us to sacrifice in terms of getting rid of fossil fuels.
00:03:38.260 They want to eliminate the kinds of jobs that they don't want. They really talk out loud about this
00:03:43.700 utopian vision that they have for the world where the experts are in charge and everyone else just
00:03:48.660 does exactly what they say. And so lo and behold, no surprise, people don't like that. People don't
00:03:53.860 like being told what to do by a group of out-of-touch experts and snobs. And that is exactly what the
00:03:59.540 World Economic Forum is all about. So it's easy to understand why there is a lot of interest in what
00:04:05.860 goes on at Davos. There's a lot of anger about what goes on at Davos. And it's not just coming
00:04:10.420 from the conventional political right. I know that a lot of the ink spilled in the Canadian legacy media
00:04:16.260 talking about how there's these conspiracies on the right. The reality is that people on the left
00:04:20.500 also oppose a group of billionaires flying in their private jets, heading to, again, a luxury ski resort in
00:04:27.300 the Swiss Alps to kind of rub elbows with politicians and government officials and the head of NGOs.
00:04:33.860 Like this whole gathering upsets a lot of people, not just on the political right, but on the political
00:04:39.540 left as well. Our own Andrew Lawton, who's on the ground there, has been reporting how most of the
00:04:44.180 protesters that go in and try to destabilize it, you know, they're climate environmentalists or they're
00:04:48.660 vegan activists. They're people who you would traditionally think of on the political right.
00:04:52.420 Obviously, there's a lot of frustration and skepticism from the political right as well.
00:04:58.980 And yet what we see from the media, almost in lockstep, is a kind of weird defense of these
00:05:05.460 global elites. You have media across the board in Canada basically saying it's not okay to criticize
00:05:11.860 these global elites. And if you do, you will be called a conspiracy theorist. This is a perfect
00:05:16.660 example, I think, of why Ezra Levant over at The Rebel, he coined the term the media party to
00:05:22.900 describe the media, the journalists in Canada, because they all take the same position. It's like
00:05:27.700 a party where they all kind of agree on the party lines and then they repeat the same talking points
00:05:32.820 about it. It doesn't matter what publication they write for. It doesn't matter whether they're
00:05:36.740 journalists, reporters, political pundits. It doesn't matter really if they're conservative or liberal.
00:05:41.220 They all have the same opinion when it comes to Davos. We're going to go through some of that
00:05:46.500 on the show today. So first, I want to talk about the so-called conspiracy theory and what it is all
00:05:52.020 about. So when you see all these members of the media party sort of shaking in anger and consternation,
00:05:58.980 saying, you know, these awful right-wingers and their conspiracy theorists about the World Economic
00:06:04.180 Forum, what are they talking about? Well, basically, the conspiracy theory is that the World Economic Forum
00:06:09.220 has penetrated Canada's cabinet, that this group of elites basically controls Justin Trudeau
00:06:15.700 and his cabinet. There's also a conspiracy around Klaus Schaub, who is the head of the World Economic
00:06:21.060 Forum. He started this thing 51 years ago. He's an academic from Switzerland. And the idea is that
00:06:28.260 basically this guy has total control. He controls governments. He planned the pandemic, that the whole
00:06:34.420 idea behind the pandemic was a great reset in order to just collapse the global economy and restart to
00:06:42.740 build it in some other way. Obviously, that's not true. This guy isn't all that powerful. But, you know,
00:06:47.780 the reason why people believe this, the reason why people think this is because that's literally what
00:06:52.820 he says. That's literally what he says. So here is Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum,
00:06:58.980 explaining how he has penetrated governments with its young global leaders program, including Justin
00:07:05.300 Trudeau. Let's see that clip. And I have to say, when I mention our names like Mrs. Merkel,
00:07:13.700 even Vladimir Putin and so on, they all have been young global leaders of the World Economic Forum.
00:07:20.260 But what we are very proud of now is the young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau,
00:07:30.420 President of Argentina and so on, that we penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday I was at a reception for
00:07:40.260 Prime Minister Trudeau, and I know that half of this cabinet, or even more half of
00:07:50.260 half of this cabinet are for our actually young global leaders of the World Economic Forum.
00:07:57.060 So, gee, I wonder why some people online think that this guy has penetrated Trudeau's cabinet. Well,
00:08:03.060 maybe because he says that he has. Likewise, you know, the whole idea of the Great Reset is supposedly
00:08:08.980 a conspiracy theory. And yet, Klaus Schwab's own book is called COVID-19, The Great Reset. So,
00:08:16.180 you know, it's not like these conspiracies are coming from thin air. There is actual reasons
00:08:21.460 behind why they're there. Now, you don't have to believe the meat of the conspiracy to be skeptical
00:08:25.460 of the underlying assumptions around it. Namely that, yes, a group of very influential,
00:08:30.980 high-profile, powerful people gather every year. They go skiing in this beautiful ski resort.
00:08:36.820 Usually the event takes place in January, but this year they were all so paranoid and so worried about
00:08:41.860 COVID, they pushed it back to now to May. So they didn't get to go on their usual ski trip in the
00:08:46.740 Swiss Alps. I guess that'll have to wait till next year. But they did get to gather in this beautiful
00:08:51.060 Swiss town. And so you have this really bizarre situation where you have a bunch of Canadian 1.00
00:08:56.420 journalists basically defending global elites against accusations from Canadians that these
00:09:02.420 people are doing something nefarious so that they're somehow wrong, which again, kind of doubles
00:09:07.380 down on the reason why so many Canadians are skeptical of elites and of institutions. It's like,
00:09:13.140 here we have a group of Canadians, a large and growing group of Canadians who have lost trust in
00:09:18.340 their government. They've lost faith in the media. They've lost faith in many of the governing
00:09:23.220 institutions of our country. And part of their anger and frustration is towards this sort of global
00:09:29.940 elite class of people who make decisions for them. And when you have an instance of people expressing
00:09:36.020 their frustration at these global elites, you have the media, one of the institutions that is failing,
00:09:41.140 that Canadians have lost trust in, their knee-jerk reaction is to defend the global elite against
00:09:47.060 accusations from the people. Once again, I made this point several times on social media and on the show,
00:09:52.180 that journalists used to hold the powerful accountable in service of the public. So they
00:09:57.780 would hold government accountable, they would hold powerful people, hold billionaires, hold corporations
00:10:01.540 accountable in service of the public. Now, what we see more and more, and this is another example of it,
00:10:08.100 we see journalists holding the public accountable in service of the elites, in service of the
00:10:13.300 government. And so here we have Clark Campbell over in the Globe and Mail saying that the World Economic
00:10:17.860 Forum conspiracy theory is in the conservative leadership race, and it's in Canada's main
00:10:23.060 streets. He does pick up on this trend. He writes that as a development in Canadian politics, it could
00:10:28.100 be a lot more important than a leadership race. A sizable group of Canadians have lost trust in, well,
00:10:33.380 almost anyone. Okay, it's not just in the Globe and Mail that they are accusing Canadians of being
00:10:38.580 conspiracy theorists. Our friends over at the Toronto Sun have likewise jumped in. Here's Brian Lilly writing
00:10:44.740 an op-ed last night. Polyev shills conspiracy theories to sell memberships. His whole point here
00:10:50.900 is that, well, members of the Harper government attended the World Economic Forum a decade ago,
00:10:55.860 and therefore how could Pierre Polyev criticize it? What we see here is basically a bunch of strawman
00:11:01.940 arguments saying that Canadians who criticize the World Economic Forum are lying or they're wrong or
00:11:07.460 they're mistaken, failing to actually try to understand what the criticisms are that are deeper.
00:11:13.140 Um, so Brian Lilly writes this. Schwab's call to have a great reset in the economy as part of the
00:11:19.140 recovery from COVID-19 has been the focus of those who see the World Economic Forum as an organization
00:11:24.420 with too much power. There are regular claims the World Economic Forum controls governments, including
00:11:29.460 Justin Trudeau's cabinet, and fixes the elections. Then Brian Lilly writes, none of this is true, but it's
00:11:34.820 shared widely online, and it's the people who buy into these conspiracy theories that Polyev is trying to attract
00:11:40.340 in his bid to win the leadership of the Conservative Party. Hmm, I wonder, I wonder why people believe
00:11:46.500 that the World Economic Forum controls governments, perhaps because all of these government leaders go
00:11:50.660 and gather in Davos every year. Uh, when it comes to Justin Trudeau's cabinet, his own finance minister
00:11:56.580 sits on the board of the World Economic Forum. Forget about everything else. How is that not a conflict
00:12:01.140 of interest? How is it not a conflict of interest for a cabinet minister, the minister of finance,
00:12:06.820 to also sit on the board of this global governance organization? Our friend Rupa Subramania over in
00:12:12.500 the National Post raised these questions, and I think it's perfectly legitimate and perfectly reasonable
00:12:18.020 that we question and doubt this. So Subramania's piece here says Chrystia Freeland's side gig with the
00:12:23.220 World Economic Forum is endangering Canadian democracy. Freeland notes an invitation to Davos
00:12:29.220 marks an aspiring plutocrat's arrival on the international scene. That was a quote from Chrystia Freeland back when 0.84
00:12:35.060 she used to be critical of the World Economic Forum. The global elite don't especially enjoy the glare of
00:12:40.420 publicity on their privileged lifestyles, so much so that Freeland wrote in a 2015 opinion piece in
00:12:46.500 The Guardian that after my book Plutocrats was published in 2012, I was even disinvited to a Davos
00:12:53.060 dinner party. The doors of Davos were closing for Freeland. They swung back open with their entry into
00:12:58.260 politics in 2013. And so now we know that Freeland is sitting on the board. She's currently the only
00:13:06.820 government minister to be sitting on a board. So again, makes you wonder, why is that a conflict of
00:13:12.580 interest? Why is Chrystia Freeland allowed to sit on a board that is espousing incredibly left-wing 0.97
00:13:18.500 views, right? This is the heart of the matter, that the experts and the elites at Davos express views that
00:13:24.340 are not widely shared by Canadians. They're pretty extreme. They're pretty out there. Okay,
00:13:30.340 but here's the real issue with Davos. It's not so much that it controls the Trudeau government. I
00:13:35.620 don't think that Klaus Schwab picks up the phone and tells Justin Trudeau what to do. The problem
00:13:40.420 is that Justin Trudeau and the Liberals, and by that I mean broadly Liberals in politics and media,
00:13:46.340 including most of the media party here, is that they like global institutions. They favour globalism.
00:13:52.580 They like the United Nations. They're aspirational. They like the idea of working together. And they
00:13:57.460 truly believe in the power of these institutions. And that is counter to the growing sentiment in
00:14:02.900 society who feel like these global institutions don't work and they're not working in Canada's
00:14:07.940 best interest. They're not working in the best interest of Canadians. In fact, they sort of undermine
00:14:12.180 our sovereignty. And so it's not so much that Trudeau is controlled by them, but it's that Trudeau is
00:14:17.060 inspired by them. Trudeau and his Liberal cabinet ministers love going to these kind of global events.
00:14:21.780 They love virtue signaling. They love being at the forefront. They love the glowing
00:14:26.260 profiles that they get from like-minded journalists who also go to these events. So time and time again,
00:14:31.380 they leave Davos and they come back and basically adopt exactly what was being talked about. So we
00:14:36.660 have a bunch of examples in June 2021 addressing climate change through carbon taxes, and they use
00:14:42.100 Canada as an example of successful carbon taxes. Likewise, this idea of the Global Future Council on
00:14:48.980 energy transition. There was a piece from 2021, why we need a global framework to regulate online harm
00:14:55.620 that was talked about at the World Economic Forum. And it was adopted by Canadians. We've seen this also
00:15:01.140 in regards to the United Nations. There's a huge uprising, mostly on the political right a couple
00:15:05.540 of years ago when the United Nations introduced a global compact on migration that basically gave
00:15:10.740 migrants the exact same rights as refugees and said that anyone has the right to travel to any country and
00:15:16.020 try to get citizenship. And the media was very, you know, the media party were very upset and they
00:15:21.060 were saying, you know, this isn't law. This isn't ratified. This is just basically an aspirational
00:15:26.180 international declaration. So why are conservatives getting worked up about it? Well, the idea is
00:15:31.140 because Trudeau comes home and drafts his legislation based on the nonsense and the gobbledgoop that is
00:15:37.220 being cooked up in these international forums. And again, we see it time and time again,
00:15:41.380 which is why I'm personally very skeptical of the World Economic Forum. And I think
00:15:44.900 that the criticism of the World Economic Forum is not a conspiracy theory. Sure,
00:15:48.900 there are some conspiracy theories and those should be debunked. It's not true that these people
00:15:52.740 actually control the levers of power, but they inspire governments like the Trudeau government to
00:15:57.860 do all kinds of awful policies that are terrible for the people of Canada. And so that's why I'm happy
00:16:03.860 to see Pierre Polyev come out pretty forcefully over the weekend and say that he will ban cabinet
00:16:09.620 ministers and top officials from being involved in the World Economic Forum. And sure, this is symbolic.
00:16:14.580 It's not going to completely stop the problem of global elites trying to ram their expert opinions
00:16:19.300 down our throats, but it's a good first step. And it's a good measure of where Pierre stands in the
00:16:24.740 in the issue of sort of global institutions and global governance on one side and state sovereignty and
00:16:30.420 the supremacy of the nation state on the other side. And it's good to see Pierre come out on the side of
00:16:36.260 Canada. And so this is a video that Pierre released over the weekend where he basically lays it all out
00:16:41.380 and he lets it be known where he stands on the World Economic Forum. And let me just tell you,
00:16:46.180 this created quite the stir online. We'll go through some reaction. And so here is that clip of Pierre
00:16:51.860 letting us know where he stands on the World Economic Forum. And that is why I've made it clear
00:16:55.860 that my ministers and my government will be banned from participating in the World Economic Forum when
00:17:02.180 I'm in government.
00:17:10.980 Work for Canada. Work for Canada. If you want to go to Davos to that conference, make it a one-way ticket.
00:17:17.460 But you can't be part of our government and working for a policy agenda that is against the interests of
00:17:23.700 our people. What he says are exactly right is exactly at the heart of people's concerns with
00:17:28.420 the World Economic Forum. You can't be part of our government and working for a policy agenda that
00:17:33.540 opposes Canadians' best interests. And I couldn't have said it any better myself. Good for Pierre,
00:17:39.300 again, for putting that out. Pretty remarkable the reaction to that tweet. Every fancy person in politics
00:17:44.900 and the media came out in lockstep to denounce Pierre Polyev and to basically just try to dunk on him,
00:17:51.780 try to say that he's lying or that he's promoting conspiracy theories or saying,
00:17:56.020 well, wait a minute, Stephen Harper attended the World Economic Forum 10 years ago, right?
00:18:00.180 It's like, well, guess what? This whole realignment about the global elites and experts telling us
00:18:06.260 what to do, that wasn't as much of a concern back 10 years ago when Stephen Harper was prime minister.
00:18:11.700 And also we knew where Harper stood. It was very clear that Stephen Harper preferred,
00:18:16.500 that Stephen Harper didn't like these global institutions. Every time he went to the United Nations,
00:18:20.420 he would tell us all of the problems that he had with the UN. And so it's so weird to see journalists
00:18:26.260 like here we have Evan Solomon from CTV or Mercedes Stevenson from Global trying to punch down Pierre 0.98
00:18:31.700 as if they're his opposition, as if it's their job to counter his position. You know, they're the media,
00:18:37.700 they're supposed to be reporting things. Instead, they're jumping into the arena and acting like political
00:18:43.380 players trying to dunk on the potential conservative leader. And of course, in doing all this,
00:18:49.060 these journalists reveal themselves to be clearly, obviously part of the same global elite mindset
00:18:55.300 that gathers in Davos. I'm sure they wish that they were all in Davos as well, like Chrystia Freeland,
00:19:01.460 who managed to go from journalist to cabinet minister in Canada to board member of the World Economic Forum.
00:19:07.620 I'm sure all these journalists aspire to that and that's their aspired career path. But I want to point
00:19:13.140 out what Robin Urbach of the Globe and Mail said. She quote tweeted Pierre and says,
00:19:17.460 I will make Canada the freest country on earth by banning certain people from participating in 1.00
00:19:21.460 something the internet told me was bad. It's kind of funny that a journalist would try to measure
00:19:26.740 freedom. Like usually when you measure freedom, you think of the freedom of the everyday person,
00:19:31.380 the ability for them to have a good life, to be able to afford a house, a car, the cost of living,
00:19:37.220 free to pick their own career, free to live their life in the way they want. Typically,
00:19:41.620 when you're measuring the freedom of a society, you're not measuring in terms of what government
00:19:47.620 officials and cabinet ministers or what extracurriculars they're allowed to be involved
00:19:51.540 with. It's just sort of weird that a journalist would instinctively think of freedom in terms of
00:19:56.660 the freedom of a cabinet minister to go to some fancy conference as opposed to the freedom of everyday
00:20:02.900 people to be able to live their life and pursue their own interests. It just really, again, shows you
00:20:08.820 the mindset of journalists that they're interested in defending the elite. They're not interested
00:20:14.020 in defending Canadians. They're not interested in holding elites accountable in service of
00:20:18.900 Canadians. They're interested in the exact opposite of that, holding Canadians accountable in service 0.56
00:20:23.940 of global elites. Well, this seems like a good point in the program to bring in Andrew Lawton,
00:20:29.220 True Norris Andrew Lawton, who's reporting from the ground in Davos, Switzerland. Andrew, it's great to have you.
00:20:33.460 Hey, it's good to be with you. So I wouldn't even know half the half of what was going on at Davos
00:20:39.860 if it wasn't for your reporting. The legacy media seems to have no interest in what's being said and
00:20:45.220 the themes and what's going on there. So first question for you, Andrew, why did you decide to
00:20:49.620 go to Davos and why do you think it's so important to report on this kind of stuff?
00:20:52.500 Well, I think there are two things. I mean, one is that we try to give the people what they want.
00:20:56.260 And I know our audience has been talking a lot about this, asking a lot about the questions they have
00:21:00.980 about the WAF and specifically its context on Canadians. And I know there are a lot of things
00:21:05.540 that are territorial about this organization because it is mysterious and that mystery and
00:21:10.740 secrecy breed that sort of stuff. But I think there's an overcorrection from a lot of people
00:21:15.380 who want to avoid looking at it at all, who say, oh, it's all conspiracy. You can't do anything. So
00:21:20.740 really what I want to do is come here and do what we do best at True North, which is talk about the facts,
00:21:25.220 talk about the side of the story the mainstream media is not representing,
00:21:28.260 and explain without delving into the fringe stuff that really isn't, I think, the bulk of
00:21:32.820 most people's criticisms with the WEF. Talk about what the organization is, what it stands for. And
00:21:37.620 a lot of that is just using its own language and showing what it is that they want. I mean,
00:21:42.900 there is no secrecy about the agenda. They're really using, I think, a very vocal and clear
00:21:47.140 language about what it is they want to do. So just a question, because I remember you had some
00:21:51.540 issues where they didn't want to let you in. They didn't want to allow you to cover this as a journalist.
00:21:55.380 You couldn't get the right credentials. But it seems like you have been able to get in and report
00:21:59.140 on that. So can you give us a bit of an update of your ability to access and report as a journalist
00:22:05.300 there on the ground? Yeah. So officially, I have no status. Officially, I can't go into any of the
00:22:10.260 secure areas. They have this really weird caste system with badges where your status depends on
00:22:16.100 the color of badge you have. And I'm completely bad. So I've got no status here, which means I can't
00:22:20.660 go inside. But there are two things that I think are working in my favor here. The first is that a
00:22:24.980 lot of their programming is actually public. A lot of their sessions are public. And you can access
00:22:29.300 them and watch them online. Anyone can. We have some people back in Canada as well that are going
00:22:34.340 through and looking for really important details. But the other part is that this is really an elite
00:22:39.060 village. I mean, one of the pro-climate justice protesters I spoke to a couple of days ago
00:22:43.540 characterized it pretty well as a corporate Disneyland. And they're not used to anyone in this safe space that
00:22:48.980 isn't invited. So a lot of these really important people are just walking around, going into the
00:22:53.140 shops, going into the restaurants. And I've been able to speak to UN officials. A few moments ago,
00:22:57.220 I spoke to former Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney. He didn't want to answer any questions,
00:23:01.140 but he was there. So it's really a combination of the two, what they're saying publicly and then
00:23:06.340 privately when you see them walking around just to ask them about what it is they want to do and if
00:23:10.740 they're okay with the consequences of that. Henry, you wrote a piece called The Strange Phoniness of Davos.
00:23:17.140 One of my impressions of the whole World Economic Forum is that the things that they think are the
00:23:21.860 priorities are so distant from the everyday concerns of Canadians. I know you were at the
00:23:26.660 Trucker Convoy. You report on a lot of the kind of cost of living issues that Canadians face. Can you sort
00:23:33.460 of contrast or talk about whether you think that the main areas of focus at a conference like this
00:23:39.460 are aligned with and similar to the day-to-day concerns of Canadians?
00:23:43.860 No, it's the opposite. And that's been one of the most stark things to see. And I've been trying
00:23:48.420 to figure out how to write about it. So let me workshop some material with you and your audience
00:23:52.820 here is that there's just this profound disconnect between the people that deal with the consequences
00:23:57.700 of the policies discussed here and those discussing the policies. And one significant example of this,
00:24:02.260 there was a panel yesterday featuring a Norwegian banker whose name I can't recall right now. And she
00:24:07.860 was talking about how all of these changes to green energy and the small and medium-sized business
00:24:13.220 industry are going to cause pain. Those are her words. And she said, we have to accept that it
00:24:17.140 causes pain and we have to talk about that. But she said, it's all worth it. And we have to just
00:24:20.980 tell people that it's worth it. Well, if you're a small business owner that can't afford the gas bill
00:24:24.820 or the electricity bill for your business, or you're a trucker who can't afford to put fuel in your
00:24:29.460 truck right now, you're not really going to be all that heart warmed by some Norwegian banker in the
00:24:35.140 Swiss mountains saying that, ah, yeah, but it's short-term pain, but it's better in the long run.
00:24:39.940 It's not better for the people. It may be better for the country. It may be better for the climate.
00:24:43.780 And both of those I think are big ifs, but it's not better for the people and they don't seem to care.
00:24:48.660 And it's amazing how little they seem to care about the fact that they don't care.
00:24:54.100 So one of the things, as you probably saw, Pierre Polyev came out with a video saying,
00:24:59.060 you know, if I find the prime minister, I'm not going to allow any government officials and any
00:25:02.420 cabinet ministers to go to this thing. And the reaction has been wild. Like everyone in lockstep
00:25:08.020 has come out to condemn this comment. I'm wondering if you, like, what is your feeling? Do you think
00:25:14.180 that Pierre is sort of giving oxygen to conspiracy theorists or do you think that that is a legitimate
00:25:19.540 and wise policy choice? One of the things that I find interesting, I've read a little bit of the
00:25:25.140 criticism of Pierre Polyev saying that. And what I find fascinating is that the people that try to
00:25:29.060 dismiss conspiracy theories, say they don't do anything. It's nothing. It's just a bunch of
00:25:33.300 people to get together and talk. They're, they're not actually doing anything. So if that's the case,
00:25:38.020 why do we want to be involved either? I mean, there's, there's an excuse to not want to be
00:25:41.780 involved because you think they're doing a bunch of terrible things, but if you think they're doing
00:25:45.380 nothing and it is just this global corporate Disneyland get together, then I think there's a
00:25:49.620 similar question of why do we want to embolden that? I think for Canada to come here, all of the climate
00:25:54.980 and energy discussions they're having have basically been policies that would amount to
00:25:59.380 signing a death warrant on the oil and gas sector, which in Canada is of the utmost importance. So I
00:26:03.780 think any Canadian government should be looking long and hard at their economic needs in Canada,
00:26:08.420 at what we need as a country and what they're talking about here and saying there's just not
00:26:11.700 a compatibility here. Well, Andrew, it looks like you're, you're getting rained on. So I really
00:26:15.940 appreciate you sticking it out there for this interview. I'll just ask you one, one final question.
00:26:21.220 You know, we, we, I agree with you that, that the criticism of Pierre, it feels like straw man.
00:26:25.940 It's like, rather than actually getting to the root of, Hey, this is why people don't like Davos.
00:26:30.580 This is why people don't like the world economic forum and what they're talking about. They just
00:26:33.780 say, Oh, the stupid conspiracy theorists and how, how dare Pierre give them oxygen or, or even 1.00
00:26:38.660 acknowledge them. But, but it's a fact that the Trudeau government gets inspired by these kind of 1.00
00:26:42.660 radical leftist ideas that get, um, shopped around at these kinds of conferences. We we've seen that with
00:26:47.300 climate policies, with punishing oil and gas recently with, uh, online harms or censorship.
00:26:52.180 I'm wondering if, if, uh, if you, uh, being on the ground there, what, what, what is the main
00:26:57.140 theme of the conference this year? What are people talking about and what should Canadians be concerned
00:27:01.060 about on the horizon? What's the, what's the next thing that Trudeau is going to get inspired by?
00:27:05.300 Well, the, the official theme has been rebuilding trust, which I think is an evergreen theme,
00:27:09.540 but if you look at the panels that they're having, it's all about climate, the environment.
00:27:13.380 A lot of people are walking around with these UN sustainable development goal pins, but they're
00:27:17.460 not UN employees. They're executives at Microsoft and Google that are all just walking around with
00:27:22.580 these UN pins. So I think that the climate change stuff is the biggest stuff for Canadians, but
00:27:27.700 certainly free speech as well. I mean, there was a clip I posted yesterday that went viral of
00:27:31.620 Australia's e-safety commissioner talking about how we need to recalibrate things like freedom of
00:27:36.580 speech. So we know that this is some stuff that's very much on the radar for Justin Trudeau.
00:27:41.300 I don't believe that Klaus Schwab is running the show in Canada, but I believe that the World Economic
00:27:45.380 Forum is putting out a series of policies that people like Justin Trudeau really want to lap up.
00:27:49.860 And I think that's why to go back to your original question of why are we here? Canadians need to be
00:27:53.860 paying attention to this. Well, absolutely. And again, Andrew, if it wasn't for the reporting that
00:27:58.180 you're doing, we just wouldn't even be aware of any of this. We wouldn't, wouldn't have the details.
00:28:03.060 And so we really, really appreciate you going and doing what most legacy media journalists and
00:28:07.620 candidates refuse to do, which is simply go observe, gather information, and you're doing
00:28:12.180 a great journalism out there. We appreciate it. And sorry, we're getting you, making you stand
00:28:15.700 out in the rain, but it's all worth it for the story. Excellent. Well, thank you so much, Andrew,
00:28:20.980 for reporting on the ground. That is Andrew Lawton on the ground in Davos, Switzerland,
00:28:24.500 doing excellent journalism, doing the kind of work that the legacy media refuses to do.
00:28:28.580 If you want to help True North out, if you want to help us allow our journalists to,
00:28:32.660 to go to these kinds of events, it costs a lot of money to send a reporter over there. We don't have
00:28:37.060 the deep pockets. We don't have subsidies and grants and funding from the Trudeau government,
00:28:41.620 like most other legacy media outlets. So if you want to help support the work we do,
00:28:45.860 head on over to tnc.news slash donate, and you can help fund that trip to Switzerland for Andrew Lawton,
00:28:54.020 doing great reporting on the ground. It's so important to shine a light on what is going on there,
00:28:58.020 not to give oxygen, again, to the conspiracy theorists, but just to show the problem with
00:29:03.060 the mindset of the people and the radical left-wing policies that are being cooked up
00:29:08.420 in these back rooms and on the stage at Davos, Switzerland. Well, thank you so much for tuning
00:29:14.900 in. I'm Candice Moncombe, and this is The Candice Moncombe Show.