ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- May 02, 2020
What are our rights?
Episode Stats
Length
19 minutes
Words per Minute
195.34576
Word Count
3,839
Sentence Count
3
Misogynist Sentences
1
Hate Speech Sentences
2
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
so do we have any rights what even are rights and how do we protect them well fundamentally
00:00:13.020
rights are divided into two groups positive and negative rights positive rights mean that you
00:00:19.380
will be given or you are entitled to a good or service so that would be in some countries for
00:00:25.260
example housing many people believe housing is a right and a human right and so you should be
00:00:30.300
given or provided with housing on the other hand we have negative rights a negative right simply
00:00:36.180
requires that someone leave you alone this is probably best known with free speech so you have
00:00:41.460
the ability to say something and you are basically guaranteed that no one will stop you or bother you
00:00:47.760
while you are saying that thing now I don't want to delve into any specific rights I more want to
00:00:53.820
talk about the concept because I think this concept is at the heart of a discussion that has been going
00:00:59.580
on since everyone is basically stuck at home there's a lot of confusion over what we're supposed
00:01:04.800
to do and what our rights are and so I think having a look at rights and where they come from and how we
00:01:10.180
uphold them can really help people illuminate some of the parts of that discussion so that it can
00:01:15.160
actually be fruitful and not devolve into a yelling match as often happens on the internet now I want
00:01:20.980
to start at the very very beginning I want to start with the social contract or social contract theory
00:01:27.160
now this is basically the view that your rights and the way that we understand society simply comes
00:01:34.360
from a social contract we together as a collective have a collective unwritten unspoken agreement with
00:01:41.660
each other and this allows us to have the freedoms and security that we would otherwise not have now one
00:01:48.980
of the earliest people to talk about rights in such a manner is Thomas Hobbes whose famous work the
00:01:54.760
Leviathan goes into a lot of these things and so Thomas Hobbes is probably most famous for this quotation
00:02:00.980
down here it's right at the bottom so he divides the world into two there's the world with the social
00:02:08.540
contract and then there's the world of the state of nature so in the state of nature it's basically this
00:02:14.180
here during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe so this is the social
00:02:18.580
contract or he's referencing particularly the government but under the auspices of a social
00:02:23.020
contract under the auspices of a common power to keep them all in awe they are in conditions called
00:02:31.160
war and such a war as if every man against every man so basically every man for himself you're doing
00:02:36.180
whatever you want to this war of every man against every man there is also consequence that nothing can
00:02:41.160
be unjust that notions of right and wrong justice and injustice have no place where there is no common
00:02:46.580
power there is no law where no law no injustice force and fraud are in war the cardinal virtues
00:02:52.900
and here's the the main part no arts no letters no society and which is worst of all continual fear
00:02:59.480
and danger of a violent death and the life of man solitary poor nasty brutish and short you've probably
00:03:05.340
heard that nasty brutish brutish and short bit before but he's basically trying to describe two
00:03:11.220
things one is again the social contract social contract theory with a government or some power
00:03:16.300
to keep all these um desires all these wars between man and against man and that's you know if i need if
00:03:23.760
it's if it's not obvious between people against people and so he's basically saying that you're living
00:03:29.500
in a state of nature right this is outside of government this is probably what we would think of
00:03:35.260
as survival of the fittest to put it in a different context so this is where there's no rules there's
00:03:41.760
nothing is right nothing is wrong it's sort of a kill or be killed take you know whatever works for
00:03:45.520
you whatever you would like you have to fight for it it's a constant war so this is on one hand this
00:03:51.600
is what hobbes is saying is the opposite then we have the social contract so if we go back here and
00:03:57.460
scroll a bit down um in addition to subjectivism he infers in this theory that human nature that
00:04:04.360
humans are exclusively self-interested okay so now he's saying that we are self-interested and we
00:04:10.560
have the capacity for rational thought so because of these two things we're able to rationally think
00:04:17.180
about items and because we are able to be self-interested and and understand that self-interest in a
00:04:23.700
rational way i thought i had another quote um so because of that we are able to enter into a social
00:04:28.900
contract where for example you would like to have something that someone else has but you recognize
00:04:34.280
that other people have those same desires about you so you're not going to go and beat up your
00:04:39.000
neighbor and take his sheep or his car or whatever it is you know depending on time period you want to
00:04:43.500
put this context in so you're not going to do that to your neighbor because you don't want your neighbor
00:04:48.700
to do that to you you want to have that common security that hobbes is talking about that social
00:04:53.480
contract those unwritten rules where you are behaving in such a manner that facilitates other
00:04:58.560
people to behave in the same manner and therefore you have in essence more security and more freedom
00:05:03.720
under the framework or under the constraints even of this new social contract so one of the things i
00:05:10.280
think most people tend to think about is this here and this is the american declaration of independence
00:05:15.680
and so the most well-known section in the declaration of independence is this we hold these truths to be
00:05:21.440
self-evident that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator with certain
00:05:26.300
unalienable rights that among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness that to secure
00:05:31.360
these rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the
00:05:36.660
government so there's a lot to unpack here and let's examine it line by line so we have first we hold
00:05:42.420
these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator
00:05:47.620
with certain unalienable rights so right off the bat here you see that the declaration of independence
00:05:52.660
is basically saying that you have these rights regardless of anyone regardless of any government
00:05:57.600
social contract any state or anything you have these rights by virtue of you being born and you
00:06:03.100
being a human person you have these rights um among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
00:06:10.960
and that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men so here we can see the
00:06:17.400
influence of the social contract so it's you have these rights however to secure these rights to uphold
00:06:24.340
and protect these rights that you as a god-given person have you have these rights automatically but
00:06:30.020
we're going to we're going to create governments and institutions to simply secure these rights they're
00:06:34.800
not giving you the rights government is not giving you the rights but they're securing them for you
00:06:39.220
um deriving in their just powers from the consent of the governed so here again this is the powers of
00:06:47.140
government are being given to government by people as long as they handle them justly and with the
00:06:53.620
consent of the populace so this is the american version and this is what i think a lot of people
00:06:58.840
tend to understand or perceive simply because we're swimming in american culture often and there's so many
00:07:04.060
movies about the declaration of independence you hear so much about the constitution constitutionality
00:07:08.340
upholding rights and amendments etc etc etc and so i think a lot of people tend to have this frame of
00:07:13.120
reference but what does canada say what does our constitution actually say so if you pull up the
00:07:18.800
constitution act 1982 right so this is when we repatriated our constitution we officially got our own
00:07:26.380
constitution the highest um uh courts and the highest documents came back and became officially canadian no
00:07:33.720
longer uh british and again i don't want to get into those ties in the back and forth but but this is
00:07:38.760
the constitution act of 1982 and it is referred to commonly as you would know the charter of rights
00:07:45.000
and freedoms so this is what is establishing your rights so right here in the in the opening the
00:07:50.040
canadian charter of rights and freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to
00:07:55.940
such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrated demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
00:08:02.040
society so right off the bat this is a very different introduction now i know this is not the
00:08:07.080
declaration of independence uh in in many ways it is because we are reconst we are um repatriating our
00:08:13.700
constitution back from the uk and obviously the same way no much the same way um that the u.s repatriated
00:08:19.640
uh them their constitution back and had their own constitution although again they had a um
00:08:25.080
uh uh civil war and in a uh rebellion but again it's sort of the same idea but now look at the
00:08:32.540
difference here um the reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
00:08:39.620
and democratic society so right now we're putting out that this document guarantees rights but there
00:08:44.540
are limits so right off the bat there are limits there is nothing right here in the opening preamble
00:08:50.180
that talks about inalienable rights or where these rights are coming from so let's go down further
00:08:55.180
look at the document here it's listing the different kind of rights freedom of conscience freedom of
00:08:59.360
religion etc uh you you guys are i'm sure familiar with these um there's a human rights commission
00:09:04.180
which i'll talk about in a second but we have down here now here legal rights this is where it's
00:09:12.340
trying to enshrine where are your rights coming from and so right here we have a bit of a distinction
00:09:17.660
between legal rights or what some would refer to as natural rights which are more in line with the
00:09:23.380
u.s the american understanding of the sort of god-given rights of the the rights you have by
00:09:27.520
nature here we're diving right into legal rights and to go off on a bit of a tangent for a second
00:09:33.420
about why that's not necessarily an issue is because ultimately as with the american constitution
00:09:40.080
and the american declaration of independence you have here that to secure these rights governments
00:09:44.760
are instituted among men and let's pause because this is a super super interesting and super
00:09:51.260
important point we need to all remember that these rights in essence regardless of where they're coming
00:09:58.060
from both sides recognize that you require a state or social contract and so here we're looking at the
00:10:06.200
legal legalistic aspect of it and we'll dive a bit deeper into that but this is the legalistic
00:10:11.080
legalistic aspect of how we're going to enforce and protect those rights so again everyone has the
00:10:16.600
right to life liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in
00:10:20.500
accordance with the principles of fundamental justice okay another bone thrown to you another
00:10:24.740
sort of wrench in in understanding what this is what are the principles of fundamental justice what
00:10:30.420
is what is that you know that's that's kind of confusing you might have a vague idea
00:10:33.700
so what is what does the charter say what does the government have to say about this
00:10:37.520
so if we scroll down here you can see that the fundamental um fundamental justice it's talking
00:10:43.540
about here the principles of fundamental justice are not limited to procedural matters
00:10:47.480
right so not just the uh you know how we enforce these rights and the act and laws the regulations
00:10:52.180
but including include substantive principles of fundamental justice again what are substantive
00:10:57.400
principles let's go down further substantive principles of fundamental justice include the
00:11:01.600
principles against arbitrariness overbreath and gross disproportionality a deprivation of a right
00:11:07.140
will be arbitrary and thus unjustifiably limit section seven if it bears no connection to the
00:11:12.100
law's purpose so you have a law that if you you know if you say something that you're not supposed
00:11:16.620
to say your house will be taken away that would be disproportional if you have a law that says
00:11:22.840
that you cannot go past a certain speed limit but people are using that law to enforce something
00:11:29.360
that's totally irrelevant it again bears no connection to the law's purpose because the purpose
00:11:32.980
is to have speed limits and to ensure safe operation of a motor vehicle on uh on roads and so this is
00:11:39.680
kind of what you're getting from the canadian constitution and this is where we're at on a more
00:11:44.920
legalistic and procedural basis so we're not really looking at the the pie in the sky idea um in our
00:11:51.080
constitution about where rights come from or what they what they are in a sort of abstract sense um it's
00:11:57.100
almost similar to um you know the forms plato's forms if you're familiar where there is the idea
00:12:03.560
of a table and there's many different tables out there but there is some universal concept of a table
00:12:09.560
that exists and everyone is able to sort of tap into that universal understanding of what a table is
00:12:14.620
that's why we know instinctively what is or is not or can or cannot be used as a table and so that's kind of
00:12:21.620
the pie in the sky edition and we are looking more in canada at the fundamental and the practical
00:12:26.240
now we have the human rights commission which talks about human human rights in canada and so
00:12:32.620
human rights but wait a second how do human rights differ from regular rights so this website provides a
00:12:39.480
an interesting an interesting analysis in simplest terms the difference between a human and a civil right
00:12:45.360
is why you have them human rights arise simply by being a human so this is the again the american
00:12:51.200
understanding these inalienable rights um you know you can add in given to you by your creator or
00:12:55.560
again simply just because you're human you you have these rights um civil rights on the other hand
00:13:00.380
arise by virtue of a legal grant of a right and so these are the ones that you have to have the
00:13:05.720
government giving you or uh enforcing for you or upholding for you these are the ones the civil rights
00:13:12.220
that is is given to you by government so this might be more akin to affirmative action type of rights
00:13:20.420
rights or other type of rights that the government then has to give and it is only because you are
00:13:25.760
a citizen or a member of that group or or country um then then you have those rights but back to the
00:13:32.260
human rights commission so again we have sort of where where are we getting these rights and it lists
00:13:37.040
two fundamental documents the canadian human rights act of 1977 and the un declaration of human
00:13:42.580
rights now i know i'm not the biggest fan of the un i think there's many problems many many
00:13:46.740
problems with the un i know a lot of readers and viewers are obviously not fans of the united nations
00:13:51.960
and especially right now there's a lot of talk about that but the un declaration of human rights
00:13:56.220
is an important document nonetheless to look at especially for our legal apparatus and and the way
00:14:01.560
that we're structuring governments and societies right now so there's the un declaration of human
00:14:06.240
rights and again it goes through different rights but you'll notice that it doesn't have
00:14:11.180
those uh inalible uh god-given rights that the american um declaration of independence does and
00:14:16.820
that's possibly simply because of the the time that it was written um 1776 versus 1948 for this
00:14:22.780
or for um 1982 for the the canadian charter but more than that let's think about it again in a more
00:14:30.900
practical manner talking about rights and why a social contract is important but also what we what
00:14:37.960
we need to do about it and what we need to think about it so you can imagine this um sort of state
00:14:43.200
of nature this arbitrary position where there's there's no right there's no government it's just
00:14:46.260
kind of you hanging out with your family maybe you have a farm maybe you're a hunter-gatherer you're
00:14:50.520
just kind of out there in the state of nature and someone wants to take one of your things so now it's
00:14:57.040
either you know you against them you'll have to fight them to protect your things and that's really
00:15:02.060
where we're at if you're weak then someone will take your stuff you go out you have your family
00:15:07.120
your maybe your immediate family or your larger family they can help you protect your rights
00:15:11.860
there's an unwritten agreement in your family that this is how we operate we all have private
00:15:17.140
property we all have you know certain rights i'm not going to go into your hut you're not going to
00:15:20.380
go into my hut um you know if someone from outside wants to go into these huts i'll help defend you
00:15:24.760
you'll help defend me etc etc you extrapolate that out you can get from a family to a clan to a tribe
00:15:32.400
to a nation and then in the largest and most abstract sense to a government and so rights
00:15:39.740
are in essence something that is upheld by the government and so really what i want the purpose
00:15:47.060
of this video to be about is to get in people's minds the understanding and the thought that
00:15:52.800
regardless of where these rights are coming from i mean if you're a non-believer
00:15:56.020
then you you don't believe that you're endowed with any inalienable rights by a creator because
00:16:01.360
there is no creator so you you can't be given some arbitrary pie-in-the-sky rights by uh you
00:16:06.160
know a little man in the clouds because that man doesn't exist if you are a believer you might
00:16:10.420
believe that you know you have these god-given rights and that people do not have the right to
00:16:15.300
use that term here again um people don't have the right to violate your rights and to take away
00:16:20.680
your things or or um take your private property or or harm you in any sort of way because you you
00:16:26.200
have those rights but you're still stuck where the government is the guarantor of those rights
00:16:33.560
or for lack of a better term if you don't prefer government society again if you're going to the
00:16:37.700
smaller ones um family family family clan tribe nation those are more societal based there's no
00:16:43.140
official um government apparatus so why does this matter why why is it important to talk about rights
00:16:48.620
and why is it important to talk about now well obviously right now there is some suspension of
00:16:54.940
rights people i think um people are angry with some of the stay-at-home orders they're they're
00:17:00.680
getting tired of this it's been quite a long time a number of people have been home already for 50 days
00:17:04.340
straight without really going anywhere except perhaps the grocery store maybe to the park
00:17:08.080
um you know maybe to have a driveway beer if their if their neighbors are not snitching on them
00:17:11.640
um so people are very upset about their rights being violated and so it is important for us
00:17:18.920
as canadians to understand the concept of rights where our rights come from when they are being
00:17:26.280
violated when is it a justifiable violation of those rights and understanding how we can remedy
00:17:34.320
the situation to protect our rights in the future because there may be situations where your rights have
00:17:40.620
to be violated you commit a crime you don't have rights you lose certain rights because now the state
00:17:46.000
is apprehending you and you are going to be put on trial or you're going to face some sort of
00:17:49.780
punishment there's obviously times when you have to violate somebody's rights and that is something
00:17:54.980
that we as a society all agree but as a nation as a populace we have to understand these rights
00:18:01.400
we have to pay attention when our rights are slipping away what are the rights that we ex what are the
00:18:07.440
rights that we expect our government to uphold and how do we guarantee that the government go and do
00:18:12.680
that so i want to come back and examine this issue and maybe talk about a couple of specific rights
00:18:17.720
and how we can really move forward because i think right now during this covid crisis it's an excellent
00:18:26.180
time for everyone to reacquaint themselves with some of these concepts because when we when we come
00:18:30.200
out of this there's going to be a lot of questions did we overreact did we underreact we're right now in
00:18:35.300
the middle i'm making this video this is sort of in the middle still um we're you know maybe 50 days in
00:18:39.560
this is uh um um in in just the beginning of of may but there's a lot of questions and hindsight is
00:18:46.460
obviously going to be 2020 but we we're going to have to look back and say were these things
00:18:49.680
justifiable did we make the right decisions how can we make those decisions better so i want everyone
00:18:54.580
to sort of think about rights about human rights about natural rights and inalienable rights and where
00:18:59.740
these rights are coming from how we can protect ourselves how we can uphold these rights and let's have
00:19:04.640
that discussion let's um throw some ideas down in the comments let's you know subscribe so we can we
00:19:10.280
can get the latest update and see what a lot of the other two north contributors are talking about
00:19:14.320
because they're also talking about a lot of these things even if they're not outlining it in such
00:19:18.220
direct terms but let's have that conversation and let's come back in a little bit and see what
00:19:22.820
everybody thinks and what we can't pull out this conversation to make it better and hopefully come
00:19:27.380
out of this crisis as a much stronger freer and better country so thank you so much take care
00:19:33.000
wash your hands stay safe and i'm samish kenazi for true north have a great day a great evening
00:19:37.600
and be safe take care
Link copied!