What are our rights?
Episode Stats
Words per minute
195.34576
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Hate speech
2
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, I discuss the concept of human rights and how they come from the social contract theory of Thomas Hobbes and his theory of the nature of the world according to which we have a collective unwritten, unspoken agreement with each other that allows us to have the freedoms and security that we would otherwise not have.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
so do we have any rights what even are rights and how do we protect them well fundamentally
00:00:13.020
rights are divided into two groups positive and negative rights positive rights mean that you
00:00:19.380
will be given or you are entitled to a good or service so that would be in some countries for
00:00:25.260
example housing many people believe housing is a right and a human right and so you should be
00:00:30.300
given or provided with housing on the other hand we have negative rights a negative right simply
00:00:36.180
requires that someone leave you alone this is probably best known with free speech so you have
00:00:41.460
the ability to say something and you are basically guaranteed that no one will stop you or bother you
00:00:47.760
while you are saying that thing now I don't want to delve into any specific rights I more want to
00:00:53.820
talk about the concept because I think this concept is at the heart of a discussion that has been going
00:00:59.580
on since everyone is basically stuck at home there's a lot of confusion over what we're supposed
00:01:04.800
to do and what our rights are and so I think having a look at rights and where they come from and how we
00:01:10.180
uphold them can really help people illuminate some of the parts of that discussion so that it can
00:01:15.160
actually be fruitful and not devolve into a yelling match as often happens on the internet now I want
00:01:20.980
to start at the very very beginning I want to start with the social contract or social contract theory
00:01:27.160
now this is basically the view that your rights and the way that we understand society simply comes
00:01:34.360
from a social contract we together as a collective have a collective unwritten unspoken agreement with
00:01:41.660
each other and this allows us to have the freedoms and security that we would otherwise not have now one
00:01:48.980
of the earliest people to talk about rights in such a manner is Thomas Hobbes whose famous work the
00:01:54.760
Leviathan goes into a lot of these things and so Thomas Hobbes is probably most famous for this quotation
00:02:00.980
down here it's right at the bottom so he divides the world into two there's the world with the social
00:02:08.540
contract and then there's the world of the state of nature so in the state of nature it's basically this
00:02:14.180
here during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe so this is the social
00:02:18.580
contract or he's referencing particularly the government but under the auspices of a social
00:02:23.020
contract under the auspices of a common power to keep them all in awe they are in conditions called
00:02:31.160
war and such a war as if every man against every man so basically every man for himself you're doing
00:02:36.180
whatever you want to this war of every man against every man there is also consequence that nothing can
00:02:41.160
be unjust that notions of right and wrong justice and injustice have no place where there is no common
00:02:46.580
power there is no law where no law no injustice force and fraud are in war the cardinal virtues
00:02:52.900
and here's the the main part no arts no letters no society and which is worst of all continual fear
00:02:59.480
and danger of a violent death and the life of man solitary poor nasty brutish and short you've probably
0.60
00:03:05.340
heard that nasty brutish brutish and short bit before but he's basically trying to describe two
00:03:11.220
things one is again the social contract social contract theory with a government or some power
00:03:16.300
to keep all these um desires all these wars between man and against man and that's you know if i need if
00:03:23.760
it's if it's not obvious between people against people and so he's basically saying that you're living
00:03:29.500
in a state of nature right this is outside of government this is probably what we would think of
00:03:35.260
as survival of the fittest to put it in a different context so this is where there's no rules there's
00:03:41.760
nothing is right nothing is wrong it's sort of a kill or be killed take you know whatever works for
00:03:45.520
you whatever you would like you have to fight for it it's a constant war so this is on one hand this
00:03:51.600
is what hobbes is saying is the opposite then we have the social contract so if we go back here and
00:03:57.460
scroll a bit down um in addition to subjectivism he infers in this theory that human nature that
00:04:04.360
humans are exclusively self-interested okay so now he's saying that we are self-interested and we
00:04:10.560
have the capacity for rational thought so because of these two things we're able to rationally think
00:04:17.180
about items and because we are able to be self-interested and and understand that self-interest in a
00:04:23.700
rational way i thought i had another quote um so because of that we are able to enter into a social
00:04:28.900
contract where for example you would like to have something that someone else has but you recognize
00:04:34.280
that other people have those same desires about you so you're not going to go and beat up your
00:04:39.000
neighbor and take his sheep or his car or whatever it is you know depending on time period you want to
00:04:43.500
put this context in so you're not going to do that to your neighbor because you don't want your neighbor
00:04:48.700
to do that to you you want to have that common security that hobbes is talking about that social
00:04:53.480
contract those unwritten rules where you are behaving in such a manner that facilitates other
00:04:58.560
people to behave in the same manner and therefore you have in essence more security and more freedom
00:05:03.720
under the framework or under the constraints even of this new social contract so one of the things i
00:05:10.280
think most people tend to think about is this here and this is the american declaration of independence
00:05:15.680
and so the most well-known section in the declaration of independence is this we hold these truths to be
00:05:21.440
self-evident that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator with certain
00:05:26.300
unalienable rights that among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness that to secure
00:05:31.360
these rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the
0.87
00:05:36.660
government so there's a lot to unpack here and let's examine it line by line so we have first we hold
00:05:42.420
these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator
00:05:47.620
with certain unalienable rights so right off the bat here you see that the declaration of independence
00:05:52.660
is basically saying that you have these rights regardless of anyone regardless of any government
00:05:57.600
social contract any state or anything you have these rights by virtue of you being born and you
00:06:03.100
being a human person you have these rights um among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
00:06:10.960
and that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men so here we can see the
00:06:17.400
influence of the social contract so it's you have these rights however to secure these rights to uphold
00:06:24.340
and protect these rights that you as a god-given person have you have these rights automatically but
00:06:30.020
we're going to we're going to create governments and institutions to simply secure these rights they're
00:06:34.800
not giving you the rights government is not giving you the rights but they're securing them for you
00:06:39.220
um deriving in their just powers from the consent of the governed so here again this is the powers of
00:06:47.140
government are being given to government by people as long as they handle them justly and with the
00:06:53.620
consent of the populace so this is the american version and this is what i think a lot of people
00:06:58.840
tend to understand or perceive simply because we're swimming in american culture often and there's so many
00:07:04.060
movies about the declaration of independence you hear so much about the constitution constitutionality
00:07:08.340
upholding rights and amendments etc etc etc and so i think a lot of people tend to have this frame of
00:07:13.120
reference but what does canada say what does our constitution actually say so if you pull up the
00:07:18.800
constitution act 1982 right so this is when we repatriated our constitution we officially got our own
00:07:26.380
constitution the highest um uh courts and the highest documents came back and became officially canadian no
00:07:33.720
longer uh british and again i don't want to get into those ties in the back and forth but but this is
00:07:38.760
the constitution act of 1982 and it is referred to commonly as you would know the charter of rights
00:07:45.000
and freedoms so this is what is establishing your rights so right here in the in the opening the
00:07:50.040
canadian charter of rights and freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to
00:07:55.940
such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrated demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
00:08:02.040
society so right off the bat this is a very different introduction now i know this is not the
00:08:07.080
declaration of independence uh in in many ways it is because we are reconst we are um repatriating our
00:08:13.700
constitution back from the uk and obviously the same way no much the same way um that the u.s repatriated
00:08:19.640
uh them their constitution back and had their own constitution although again they had a um
00:08:25.080
uh uh civil war and in a uh rebellion but again it's sort of the same idea but now look at the
00:08:32.540
difference here um the reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
00:08:39.620
and democratic society so right now we're putting out that this document guarantees rights but there
00:08:44.540
are limits so right off the bat there are limits there is nothing right here in the opening preamble
00:08:50.180
that talks about inalienable rights or where these rights are coming from so let's go down further
00:08:55.180
look at the document here it's listing the different kind of rights freedom of conscience freedom of
00:08:59.360
religion etc uh you you guys are i'm sure familiar with these um there's a human rights commission
00:09:04.180
which i'll talk about in a second but we have down here now here legal rights this is where it's
00:09:12.340
trying to enshrine where are your rights coming from and so right here we have a bit of a distinction
00:09:17.660
between legal rights or what some would refer to as natural rights which are more in line with the
00:09:23.380
u.s the american understanding of the sort of god-given rights of the the rights you have by
00:09:27.520
nature here we're diving right into legal rights and to go off on a bit of a tangent for a second
00:09:33.420
about why that's not necessarily an issue is because ultimately as with the american constitution
00:09:40.080
and the american declaration of independence you have here that to secure these rights governments
00:09:44.760
are instituted among men and let's pause because this is a super super interesting and super
00:09:51.260
important point we need to all remember that these rights in essence regardless of where they're coming
00:09:58.060
from both sides recognize that you require a state or social contract and so here we're looking at the
00:10:06.200
legal legalistic aspect of it and we'll dive a bit deeper into that but this is the legalistic
00:10:11.080
legalistic aspect of how we're going to enforce and protect those rights so again everyone has the
00:10:16.600
right to life liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in
00:10:20.500
accordance with the principles of fundamental justice okay another bone thrown to you another
00:10:24.740
sort of wrench in in understanding what this is what are the principles of fundamental justice what
00:10:30.420
is what is that you know that's that's kind of confusing you might have a vague idea
00:10:33.700
so what is what does the charter say what does the government have to say about this
00:10:37.520
so if we scroll down here you can see that the fundamental um fundamental justice it's talking
00:10:43.540
about here the principles of fundamental justice are not limited to procedural matters
00:10:47.480
right so not just the uh you know how we enforce these rights and the act and laws the regulations
00:10:52.180
but including include substantive principles of fundamental justice again what are substantive
00:10:57.400
principles let's go down further substantive principles of fundamental justice include the
00:11:01.600
principles against arbitrariness overbreath and gross disproportionality a deprivation of a right
00:11:07.140
will be arbitrary and thus unjustifiably limit section seven if it bears no connection to the
00:11:12.100
law's purpose so you have a law that if you you know if you say something that you're not supposed
00:11:16.620
to say your house will be taken away that would be disproportional if you have a law that says
00:11:22.840
that you cannot go past a certain speed limit but people are using that law to enforce something
00:11:29.360
that's totally irrelevant it again bears no connection to the law's purpose because the purpose
00:11:32.980
is to have speed limits and to ensure safe operation of a motor vehicle on uh on roads and so this is
00:11:39.680
kind of what you're getting from the canadian constitution and this is where we're at on a more
00:11:44.920
legalistic and procedural basis so we're not really looking at the the pie in the sky idea um in our
00:11:51.080
constitution about where rights come from or what they what they are in a sort of abstract sense um it's
00:11:57.100
almost similar to um you know the forms plato's forms if you're familiar where there is the idea
00:12:03.560
of a table and there's many different tables out there but there is some universal concept of a table
00:12:09.560
that exists and everyone is able to sort of tap into that universal understanding of what a table is
00:12:14.620
that's why we know instinctively what is or is not or can or cannot be used as a table and so that's kind of
00:12:21.620
the pie in the sky edition and we are looking more in canada at the fundamental and the practical
00:12:26.240
now we have the human rights commission which talks about human human rights in canada and so
00:12:32.620
human rights but wait a second how do human rights differ from regular rights so this website provides a
00:12:39.480
an interesting an interesting analysis in simplest terms the difference between a human and a civil right
00:12:45.360
is why you have them human rights arise simply by being a human so this is the again the american
00:12:51.200
understanding these inalienable rights um you know you can add in given to you by your creator or
00:12:55.560
again simply just because you're human you you have these rights um civil rights on the other hand
00:13:00.380
arise by virtue of a legal grant of a right and so these are the ones that you have to have the
00:13:05.720
government giving you or uh enforcing for you or upholding for you these are the ones the civil rights
00:13:12.220
that is is given to you by government so this might be more akin to affirmative action type of rights
00:13:20.420
rights or other type of rights that the government then has to give and it is only because you are
00:13:25.760
a citizen or a member of that group or or country um then then you have those rights but back to the
00:13:32.260
human rights commission so again we have sort of where where are we getting these rights and it lists
00:13:37.040
two fundamental documents the canadian human rights act of 1977 and the un declaration of human
00:13:42.580
rights now i know i'm not the biggest fan of the un i think there's many problems many many
00:13:46.740
problems with the un i know a lot of readers and viewers are obviously not fans of the united nations
00:13:51.960
and especially right now there's a lot of talk about that but the un declaration of human rights
00:13:56.220
is an important document nonetheless to look at especially for our legal apparatus and and the way
00:14:01.560
that we're structuring governments and societies right now so there's the un declaration of human
00:14:06.240
rights and again it goes through different rights but you'll notice that it doesn't have
00:14:11.180
those uh inalible uh god-given rights that the american um declaration of independence does and
00:14:16.820
that's possibly simply because of the the time that it was written um 1776 versus 1948 for this
00:14:22.780
or for um 1982 for the the canadian charter but more than that let's think about it again in a more
00:14:30.900
practical manner talking about rights and why a social contract is important but also what we what
00:14:37.960
we need to do about it and what we need to think about it so you can imagine this um sort of state
00:14:43.200
of nature this arbitrary position where there's there's no right there's no government it's just
00:14:46.260
kind of you hanging out with your family maybe you have a farm maybe you're a hunter-gatherer you're
00:14:50.520
just kind of out there in the state of nature and someone wants to take one of your things so now it's
00:14:57.040
either you know you against them you'll have to fight them to protect your things and that's really
00:15:02.060
where we're at if you're weak then someone will take your stuff you go out you have your family
00:15:07.120
your maybe your immediate family or your larger family they can help you protect your rights
00:15:11.860
there's an unwritten agreement in your family that this is how we operate we all have private
00:15:17.140
property we all have you know certain rights i'm not going to go into your hut you're not going to
1.00
00:15:20.380
go into my hut um you know if someone from outside wants to go into these huts i'll help defend you
00:15:24.760
you'll help defend me etc etc you extrapolate that out you can get from a family to a clan to a tribe
00:15:32.400
to a nation and then in the largest and most abstract sense to a government and so rights
00:15:39.740
are in essence something that is upheld by the government and so really what i want the purpose
00:15:47.060
of this video to be about is to get in people's minds the understanding and the thought that
00:15:52.800
regardless of where these rights are coming from i mean if you're a non-believer
00:15:56.020
then you you don't believe that you're endowed with any inalienable rights by a creator because
00:16:01.360
there is no creator so you you can't be given some arbitrary pie-in-the-sky rights by uh you
00:16:06.160
know a little man in the clouds because that man doesn't exist if you are a believer you might
00:16:10.420
believe that you know you have these god-given rights and that people do not have the right to
00:16:15.300
use that term here again um people don't have the right to violate your rights and to take away
00:16:20.680
your things or or um take your private property or or harm you in any sort of way because you you
00:16:26.200
have those rights but you're still stuck where the government is the guarantor of those rights
00:16:33.560
or for lack of a better term if you don't prefer government society again if you're going to the
00:16:37.700
smaller ones um family family family clan tribe nation those are more societal based there's no
00:16:43.140
official um government apparatus so why does this matter why why is it important to talk about rights
00:16:48.620
and why is it important to talk about now well obviously right now there is some suspension of
00:16:54.940
rights people i think um people are angry with some of the stay-at-home orders they're they're
00:17:00.680
getting tired of this it's been quite a long time a number of people have been home already for 50 days
00:17:04.340
straight without really going anywhere except perhaps the grocery store maybe to the park
00:17:08.080
um you know maybe to have a driveway beer if their if their neighbors are not snitching on them
00:17:11.640
um so people are very upset about their rights being violated and so it is important for us
00:17:18.920
as canadians to understand the concept of rights where our rights come from when they are being
00:17:26.280
violated when is it a justifiable violation of those rights and understanding how we can remedy
00:17:34.320
the situation to protect our rights in the future because there may be situations where your rights have
00:17:40.620
to be violated you commit a crime you don't have rights you lose certain rights because now the state
00:17:46.000
is apprehending you and you are going to be put on trial or you're going to face some sort of
00:17:49.780
punishment there's obviously times when you have to violate somebody's rights and that is something
00:17:54.980
that we as a society all agree but as a nation as a populace we have to understand these rights
00:18:01.400
we have to pay attention when our rights are slipping away what are the rights that we ex what are the
00:18:07.440
rights that we expect our government to uphold and how do we guarantee that the government go and do
00:18:12.680
that so i want to come back and examine this issue and maybe talk about a couple of specific rights
00:18:17.720
and how we can really move forward because i think right now during this covid crisis it's an excellent
00:18:26.180
time for everyone to reacquaint themselves with some of these concepts because when we when we come
00:18:30.200
out of this there's going to be a lot of questions did we overreact did we underreact we're right now in
00:18:35.300
the middle i'm making this video this is sort of in the middle still um we're you know maybe 50 days in
00:18:39.560
this is uh um um in in just the beginning of of may but there's a lot of questions and hindsight is
00:18:46.460
obviously going to be 2020 but we we're going to have to look back and say were these things
00:18:49.680
justifiable did we make the right decisions how can we make those decisions better so i want everyone
00:18:54.580
to sort of think about rights about human rights about natural rights and inalienable rights and where
00:18:59.740
these rights are coming from how we can protect ourselves how we can uphold these rights and let's have
00:19:04.640
that discussion let's um throw some ideas down in the comments let's you know subscribe so we can we
00:19:10.280
can get the latest update and see what a lot of the other two north contributors are talking about
00:19:14.320
because they're also talking about a lot of these things even if they're not outlining it in such
00:19:18.220
direct terms but let's have that conversation and let's come back in a little bit and see what
00:19:22.820
everybody thinks and what we can't pull out this conversation to make it better and hopefully come
00:19:27.380
out of this crisis as a much stronger freer and better country so thank you so much take care
00:19:33.000
wash your hands stay safe and i'm samish kenazi for true north have a great day a great evening