Juno News - January 31, 2025
What exactly does Jagmeet Singh want?
Episode Stats
Harmful content
Misogyny
4
sentences flagged
Hate speech
4
sentences flagged
Summary
In this week's Off the Record, we discuss the latest updates from across the political spectrum, including updates from Jagmeet Singh, Kristia Freeland, and Chsenmon Georgia, as well as updates from the Prime Minister's Office.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
yeah rachel usually you you have the nicest setup out of all of us but uh you kind of downgraded
00:00:05.280
today what's going on there i'm i'm broadcasting to everyone live today from a cave no i'm in a
00:00:11.600
cabin um out west in the mountain so fortunately not a very glossy scene for me today you look
00:00:19.280
like you're on the set of a david lynch film i don't know if you guys have seen twin peaks
00:00:25.040
the late david lynch unfortunately he passed away we're not as cultured as you yeah no i'm like
00:00:31.760
twin peaks david lynch no none of these things i hope somebody in the audience gets the reference
00:00:36.000
at least i feel like the audience probably will definitely get the reference you might
00:00:39.440
have aged yourself a little bit though i'm also technically at a family thing right now so you
00:00:45.120
hear some like pitter patter of feet running in the background or you get you know some hearing
00:00:49.760
some babies screaming that's why but i just cared about the audience so much you know i had to make
00:00:54.080
sure i was here today to to give them the friday fun news so let's get it started
00:01:04.080
hey everyone welcome back to off the record i will be your host today rachel parker i am joined by my
00:01:10.960
colleagues isaac lamoreau host of the alberta roundup and cosmon georgia who is host of the daily
00:01:18.240
free that's what's called right the morning yeah i haven't done it in a while
00:01:25.360
all the uh all the like moms out there will will relate which is like a good portion of our audience
0.88
00:01:30.000
you just don't remember things anymore after you have kids so it's been another spicy week in canadian
00:01:35.840
politics i feel like we're kind of at the point now with you you write a story or you produce a podcast
00:01:41.840
episode you publish it and like an hour later you're like oh the news is out of date and no one
00:01:47.600
wants to watch this now because um something more spicy happened with the tariffs or in the case of
00:01:53.120
you know the state there's obviously that crazy um helicopter and plane crash it's like people are
00:01:57.680
pretty focused on that but we know that our canadian audience really loves and appreciates some canadian
00:02:02.560
news and there's obviously not a lot of independent media out there doing what we're doing so we
00:02:07.840
we wanted to bring you guys some updates this week from ottawa starting off with your favorite i'm
00:02:14.560
kind of torn if people dislike jagmeet singh or christia freeland more i think actually probably
00:02:19.760
jagmeet singh is even more disliked um he's saying things again all of it essentially meaningless but
00:02:26.240
you know he's been kind of waffling on what he's going to do with the federal government is he going
00:02:31.280
to continue to prop them up after we see this liberal leadership race i will also see a new prime
00:02:36.160
minister or is he still going to bring the government down early and now he's essentially
00:02:42.000
saying because of the tariffs that are supposed to be rolled out tomorrow he's saying that the
00:02:46.880
liberals need to read call parliament the parliament's return so they can pass a suite of pandemic style
00:02:53.920
relief packages for workers so he's saying he's insisting that the government returns to pass you
00:03:00.640
know billions of dollars of spending to support workers like we saw during the pandemic
00:03:05.520
the type that crippled our economy which it still has not recovered from the type that would just
0.51
00:03:09.600
simply devalue the canadian dollar even further i had economist jackman's on my podcast the rachel
00:03:16.080
parker show earlier this week and he said what we're going to see the effect of these tariffs is
00:03:19.760
it's going to further devalue the canadian dollar and in addition if the federal government does pass
00:03:25.040
pandemic-like measures that will even more devalue the canadian dollar so i know everyone at home
00:03:29.280
you're wondering didn't actually realize i could be more poor than i currently am but it sounds like
00:03:34.240
we will all be even more poor very soon so i'm just going to let you hear jagmeet out of the horse's
00:03:38.960
mouth directly here's what he had to say about what he wants liberals to do and while the liberals
00:03:43.520
seem more focused on themselves i have a specific message to the liberals if you're serious about
00:03:49.680
supports workers i'm demanding that the liberal government call back parliament let's put before
00:03:56.000
parliament a package to protect workers support workers that are impacted by these tears and to
00:04:01.680
support communities the workers behind here for sue saint-marie sue saint-marie is a community in a
00:04:07.280
in a city that could be hard hit by these tariffs so let's stand up for the sue let's stand up for
00:04:12.800
all communities across canada they're going to be hard hit by the tariffs and let's put in place
00:04:17.280
supports before the worst happens so i'm calling on the liberal government to recall parliament bring
00:04:23.920
parliament back let's pass legislation that supports workers because we're going to have an election in
00:04:29.440
the spring nothing changes around that we are going to be voting down the government in march
00:04:34.000
but there's still two months the liberals think that they can wait two months before they bring
00:04:38.640
in legislation they are wrong that would allow workers to suffer for two months that is not the
00:04:44.400
right way to do things so i'm calling on the liberals recall parliament put forward protections
00:04:50.000
for workers before parliament let's get the opposition leaders together obviously we need
00:04:54.320
to support that kind of package and then let's have an election in the spring first and foremost
00:04:58.560
the liberals are not planning on returning back to parliament to pass these measures they have said
00:05:04.320
that they would like to pass support for workers at some point but they are not looking to
00:05:08.960
go back to parliament earlier to do that so is you know we already know the answer of what he's asked
00:05:13.520
but the thing that really caught my attention there is he says we are going to have an election in the
00:05:18.080
spring so he's still saying you know i'm going to bring down the government we're going to have an
00:05:21.440
early election this spring but also you liberals i want you to do this it's sort of like he's already
00:05:27.440
ruined his argument typically you know you have kind of the carrot and the stick argument where
00:05:30.320
he's saying look if you do this for me then i'll continue to prop up your government that's
00:05:34.000
what he's been doing for the last few years is saying oh well you know the liberals are helping
00:05:38.560
me out with dental care so but if they don't do this if they don't do that i'm going to bring
00:05:42.240
down the government but now he's asking them to do something that they don't want to do
00:05:46.080
and he's not even promising them to continue propping up the government so i'm not quite
00:05:50.160
sure what type of politicking he thinks this is i don't know what he's hoping to achieve here it
00:05:55.200
doesn't even seem like you know it doesn't even seem like a adequate game plan but cosmon maybe i'm
00:06:00.080
missing something what's your take well jagmeet singh talks a lot about supporting workers and the
00:06:08.560
number one thing to do to support workers in this situation is to avoid tariffs altogether
00:06:14.880
because auto sector for example is going to be hard hit we know trump wants to maybe perhaps
00:06:21.600
completely cut off uh auto imports from canada and jagmeet singh thinks that somehow workers want
00:06:29.040
handouts instead of being able to go and earn a dollar at their work and and a dollar that's not
00:06:35.920
devalued so the number one thing jagmeet singh should be doing is advocating for a way to avoid
00:06:43.360
these tariffs but he's not he wants to go back to these huge pandemic bailouts that ended up actually
00:06:50.160
costing people more than it it actually saved them and the the difference is that with the pandemic at
00:06:57.040
least that was a time when all countries were engaging in bailouts if we do it now we're going to
00:07:02.080
be you know maybe it's us in mexico and that it's going to be a huge problem there's no it's not a
00:07:07.600
level playing field and there's only so much you can do to offset the cost of tariffs what are they
00:07:14.640
going to continue this on forever it's it's ridiculous it's not a way to approach the problem
00:07:20.080
and it's not they they need to have they need to think about problem solving and the number one problem is
00:07:26.320
how can we prevent these tariffs from taking place because they're not in place right now
00:07:30.880
they could be in place by tomorrow uh but they they we need to seriously sit down this is like
00:07:37.280
last minute negotiating stuff and instead he's talking about bringing a bill that could cost
00:07:43.440
billions and billions of dollars at a time when the government is actually running out of money and
00:07:48.320
what i we spoke about this a little before what doesn't make sense to me is that when government
00:07:53.680
returns they need to have a supply bill and that will be the first confidence vote there's how are they
00:08:00.320
going to pass a multi-billion dollar you know omnibus bill that could you know have sweeping
00:08:06.960
effects on the economy when they don't even have money to fund the operations of the government
00:08:13.920
you raise a really good point there that is one of the most comical things like i always say
00:08:18.480
in this type of scenario you kind of have to laugh even though it's going to be pretty devastating
00:08:22.240
for us and people but with this government i've learned you know andrew clavin his shtick is
00:08:26.080
kind of like laugh along with the fall of the republic i feel like i've really taken that on
00:08:29.680
you have to find comedy in the sad things that our government is doing real quickly become a very
00:08:34.160
bitter and jaded person but essentially what we're seeing in parliament is we're seeing mps and leaders
00:08:40.400
running around with their heads on fire saying we've tried everything we've tried everything we
00:08:43.840
need to get support for workers when in reality they've tried nothing justin trudeau and his caucus
00:08:48.800
couldn't even be bothered to show up at trump's inauguration to show you know support for the new
00:08:54.000
incoming president as you should do even if they're not politically aligned with you especially
00:08:58.240
in a situation like canada's currently in where we need donald trump to start to see canada in a
00:09:02.800
new light we need to see him he needs to see us favorably to avoid these tariffs they haven't done
00:09:07.280
any of the things that they could have done to get those negotiations going and it seems so natural
00:09:13.280
that their first response would be to say well let's spend more money because that's going to help
00:09:17.760
fix the problem what do you think isaac yeah no uh the the you know watching that clip the number one
00:09:23.440
thing that struck me is the make-believe timeline let's call it that singh is uh referencing which
00:09:30.080
makes no sense because he's saying there will still be an election in march but the only reason that the
00:09:34.880
election was going to take place then is because that's when parliament is prorogued to so therefore
00:09:40.000
if you call back parliament early to pass this bill as he's requested the the march date kind of
00:09:45.440
falls to the wayside he could just vote non-confidence immediately so that makes no sense uh but there's
00:09:51.600
another key date of march obviously singh qualifies for his pension in february so there you go uh and
00:09:59.440
then just speaking on the tariffs briefly um it was of course conservative house leader andrew sheer who
00:10:06.000
previously highlighted that canada would not be in the position it's in right now if singh stuck to
00:10:11.040
his word when he ripped up ripped up the supply and confidence agreement with the liberals of course
00:10:16.800
after doing that singh has voted with trudeau 11 times and since the 2021 election uh the ndp has
00:10:23.280
voted confidence in the government 286 times so we we know that him ripping up the supply and confidence
00:10:28.560
agreement was nothing more than a theatric act but i mean the the whole the whole march timeline just
00:10:35.920
makes no sense to me because as i said uh that only has to do with parliament being prorogued until then
00:10:40.480
because you brought up theatrics isaac i want to turn our attention to a foreign interference story
00:10:47.360
so we have been hearing for a very long time that there's a number of traders up in ottawa and this
00:10:53.040
week a new report that was released raises more questions than it does answers isaac i believe you
00:10:59.200
have the information for us what exactly is going on here and is this just another example of theatrics in
00:11:04.320
ottawa yeah rachel it is and this report coming to light make absolutely no sense of course i was
00:11:11.280
reading through this report and i report i reported on it myself but somebody is lying that's what this
00:11:16.560
report is showing because based on all the conflicting evidence that's been presented someone has to be
00:11:22.560
lying two of opposite things cannot be true at once because of course prime minister justin trudeau and
00:11:28.720
other leaders have lashed out at conservative leader pierre polyefra for not reading the report
00:11:33.920
because uh they said you need to read this report individuals are named they could be in your party
00:11:38.560
you don't know how to deal with them appropriately if you don't read the report but then justice hoag
00:11:44.480
tabled this report and said no individual parliamentarians were named therefore those
00:11:49.440
two truths cannot be true at once because if you were to find the the names of these people through
00:11:54.400
the report they'd obviously be named in the report but here hoag tabled this report after 18 months
00:11:59.600
of uh extensive research she said and she said that no parliamentarians were named so that doesn't make
00:12:06.240
much sense and then she also contradicted another claim in saying that nobody uh was working in bad
00:12:14.640
faith so her report directly contradicted the uh nsicop report and i don't really know how to
00:12:22.800
take that all in because uh like like i said you can't have two conflicting truths at once guys i mean
00:12:28.640
what should canadians take away from this report being tabled here so just to make sure we have
00:12:34.320
everything kind of down correctly there's a lot of moving pieces here there was 11 mps i believe that
00:12:39.360
we were told there was 11 mps that were traitors that had taken money from foreign and adversarial
00:12:45.280
governments to help in their nominations or in their election campaigns and you know for months now
00:12:51.360
we've been hearing from leaders like justin trudeau that there's traitors in parliament we heard
00:12:55.920
specifically from trudeau that he knows of conservative mps who were embroiled in the scandal
00:13:02.080
and canadians were told that we would not be given the names of those traitors in parliament
00:13:06.400
now we have this report from justice hoag and she's saying there's no traitors in parliament no one was
00:13:13.360
embroiled in scandals and canadians i think thought we were going to be receiving answers from this
00:13:18.000
report and now we're looking at it trying to decide who is actually the ones lying and i just want to
00:13:23.840
really show the juxtaposition of what's happening here um and we have it in the clips of the leaders
00:13:28.640
basically you know saying there's traitors in parliament so take a look at this i have the names
00:13:34.480
of a number of parliamentarians former parliamentarians and or candidates
00:13:40.240
in the conservative party of canada who uh are engaged or at high risk of or for whom there is
00:13:54.240
clear intelligence around foreign interference mps that are involved wittingly or unwittingly are they
00:14:00.080
traitors to canada uh what they're doing is unethical uh it is in some cases against the law and it is
00:14:07.600
indeed uh they are indeed traitors to the country certain uh and i described it initially as fewer
00:14:15.280
than a handful of current members of parliament have allowed themselves and again going back to
00:14:22.480
the original comments from thesis semi-wittingly or this one or wittingly allowed themselves to become
00:14:30.880
compromised so there we have green party leader elizabeth may although i think she's technically not
1.00
00:14:36.400
the leader anymore although she was kind of still doing it and chasing out everyone who else tried
0.99
00:14:40.320
so really not actually entirely sure what her title is with the party anymore but we've got we've got
00:14:45.520
jagmeet saying and we've got justin trudeau all saying that there are traitors in parliament
00:14:49.440
were they all just lying what's your take cosmon so the fundamental problem we need to talk about here
00:14:56.480
is when we start discussing secret lists politically it becomes a vehicle to essentially accuse your
00:15:05.760
opponents of being on that list anybody could be on that list and from day one i've been saying just
00:15:12.480
make it transparent release the report i would prefer that they release the full report with everything
00:15:18.720
unredacted but you know innocence until proven guilty they could have released the report with the
00:15:25.680
names if there are any names on it redacted and we could have at least seen what they are talking about
00:15:31.920
and the public could at least make a judgment and press further if there's actually names on that list
00:15:37.680
but that wasn't the case we spent how many months discussing this issue we've had inquiries you know
00:15:44.160
committee hearings we've wasted so much time to come to the what conclusion the hoag report does not dispel
00:15:52.480
any unease that canadians have it doesn't actually put their minds at rest and if the case is
00:15:59.760
as justice hoag says that there are no names on this list and it's not it's not as bad as uh the media
00:16:07.920
and the ccis reports and the government has claimed then why wasn't it released in the first place why didn't
00:16:14.240
she come to the conclusion at the end of her report that because of what you know our investigation our
00:16:21.760
our inquiry into this matter i recommend that this report be released to the public for the sake of
00:16:28.160
transparency but that's not the conclusion she makes she just accepts expects the public to accept
00:16:34.880
what she's saying as the truth but like i said this doesn't settle the matter and we're entering into
00:16:40.640
an election where the possibility of foreign interference could very well be real not only
00:16:45.600
in the general election at the ballots but also in the liberal leadership uh election we they've adjusted
00:16:52.800
some of their rules but that doesn't mean that the process can't be manipulated or influenced by foreign
00:16:59.360
actors one last thing i wanted to add if before we finish uh on the story on the report is that uh
00:17:06.960
justice hoag concluded the report with 51 recommendations and we had written an article
00:17:12.640
on that clayton did i think about some of the recommendations if you wanted to go read that and
00:17:16.800
one that i found interesting was the 31st recommendation which was a subset of eight
00:17:22.160
recommendations one of which was that only canadian citizens and permanent residents should be allowed to
00:17:27.520
vote in nomination hearings and in leadership contests so i thought that was a key takeaway from one of
00:17:33.040
the recommendations and by the way she said that all of these recommendations the 51
00:17:36.880
that she provided could be implemented before the next federal election one other interesting thing
00:17:43.200
that i just wanted to add was we saw that clip there of you know all the party leaders and
00:17:48.000
noticeably absent was conservative party leader peer polyev he has come under intense criticism over the
00:17:54.480
last number of months for refusing to read the report that would have told him about the traitors
00:18:00.080
in parliament that now we're hearing apparently don't exist some people have been saying you know
00:18:04.480
that he was not actually eligible for the security clearance that he would have required to read
00:18:09.600
that report and that was sort of used as a bad faith attack against him i can't help but think that
00:18:14.960
he look he's coming out of this looking the best he's coming out of this as the only party leader who's
00:18:20.160
not absolutely eating his words right now and i think he's actually been quite absolved in the last
00:18:25.840
number and since this report has been released because every other party leader has come out saying
00:18:30.400
something that now we have a justice who spent as you said isaac 18 months studying this saying
00:18:34.880
there's no traitors in parliament and so all these other party leaders are going to have to answer for
00:18:39.200
what they said and answer as to whether they lied or how they made such an intense and and and and
00:18:45.600
grievous error and polyev kind of just gets to walk away from the whole issue and maybe point at the
00:18:50.000
other comments people made so just wanted to throw that in there as well because as i said he was noticeably
00:18:54.640
absent from that compilation we showed you i think next we want to move our attention to ontario maybe
00:19:01.280
for those of you who follow ontario politics really closely you weren't surprised to hear this but i
00:19:05.840
think most of us were a little stunned when we learned this week that ontario premier doug ford
00:19:11.280
was going to be sending voters to the polls cosmon can you break this story down for us
00:19:16.240
right sure so uh premier ford asked the lieutenant governor to trigger an election and that's going
00:19:23.440
to be happening pretty soon i think i think it's march if i'm not uh mistaken i don't have the the
00:19:28.560
date right before me but he's essentially been hinting at this he's wanted to trigger an election
00:19:34.720
and his justification to do this is of course the trump tariffs even though he still has about two years
00:19:41.360
left of his mandate he claims that we need to have a strong mandate uh the ontario government needs to
00:19:48.960
have a strong mandate from voters to be able to negotiate and navigate through the disaster that
00:19:58.640
is inevitably going to come from a 25 tariff especially for the ontario economy which uh exports
00:20:04.880
a lot of materials and and items and services to the united states particularly the auto sector so he's
00:20:12.400
spoken about this he's had a press conference discussing the election and his reasoning behind
00:20:18.560
that and we'll just throw to that first clip here help ontarians understand this so your government
00:20:24.960
your cabinet has already passed an economic action plan but you are now about to trigger an election
00:20:31.440
asking people for support to support an economic action plan how does how does that work and what
00:20:37.200
is in that plan can you can you break it down for us i can't say we we triggered that uh first of all we
00:20:43.280
we want to move forward and and make sure that we give certainty right now president trump has put
00:20:50.080
uncertainty has put uncertainty to every single canadian a lot of other countries around the world and this
00:20:57.440
isn't going to happen overnight it's not may not happen february first i'm sure something's coming but this
00:21:04.400
is going to be a battle for the next four years and i want to make sure that i have an out uh make
00:21:10.320
sure i have a strong mandate to outlast president trump uh and again i i can't stress this enough
00:21:18.160
how ceos in our country are concerned which we've been meeting with but it's really a team canada
00:21:24.240
approach all premiers are working together collaboratively i'll be going on a cough meeting
00:21:30.720
uh right after i i leave here during the day and uh we're just going to be united to protect canadians
00:21:37.920
and ontarians jobs or so i posted this on x i never thought that in the year 2025 i would hear a party
00:21:46.560
campaigning on just like we did during the pandemic it all seems like a fever dream or a bad deja vu because
00:21:55.360
uh if you recall here in bc we had a similar situation where a government essentially sought
00:22:03.120
a strong mandate in the middle of the pandemic that was its own crisis and here we have ford
00:22:09.200
hearkening back to the pandemic is this gonna win him any votes this line of messaging or do you think
00:22:16.640
well will he just drop this because i i don't think that that statement just like we did during the
00:22:22.960
pandemic is very popular or brings back a lot of good memories for voters rachel well a couple thoughts
00:22:31.920
that i have first and foremost if you said the phrase we're going to do something just like we
00:22:36.480
did during the pandemic in alberta you would be absolutely eviscerated in that election cycle
00:22:42.240
without a doubt i mean the uh ucp here in alberta is essentially still still paying penance for some of
00:22:48.880
the actions that they did during the coven 19 pandemic and a lot of citizens here are simply
00:22:53.600
not ready to let it go however you have a very different situation politically in ontario one
00:22:58.960
the opposition parties are just totally absent no one is really paying attention to them they don't
00:23:04.000
have a lot of credence they just they seem to have been unable to get anything in motion since kathleen
00:23:09.200
winlep the ndps the liberals they're just you don't hear about them they're not doing anything that
00:23:13.840
people are taking notice of and we're seeing that in the polling i think the uh ontario pc they're
00:23:19.280
forecast to take like over up to 100 seats so it's going to be a super majority for ford
00:23:24.400
um but it's just the question is why is this election needed i don't think anybody is buying
00:23:30.240
the argument that he needs a mandate to act on the terrace i don't believe it i doubt ontarians do
00:23:36.960
listen i always tell people kathleen when i as as our audience knows i'm from ontario kathleen
00:23:42.080
when was the person who made me become interested in politics because i saw how her policies were
1.00
00:23:47.040
devastating my community and that was basically through the influx of hydro prices but doug ford
00:23:53.040
is the reason that i left ontario and he's also the reason that a lot of other young people have
00:23:56.560
left the province because as a young ontarian it got to the point where everything was so expensive
00:24:01.600
and there was just nothing really available in terms of good jobs and good housing and good health
00:24:06.960
care and he's the reason i left the province i know that a lot of young ontarians feel that way and i
00:24:11.680
suspect there is a bit of a brain drain impact on the province right now i just don't buy this
00:24:16.880
argument that the election is needed the september 2021 election in ontario cost the province about
00:24:22.160
560 million dollars it's just over 20 per person so this is going to be a huge expense to the
00:24:28.400
province at the same time he's promising billions of dollars in pandemic style funding which has already
00:24:33.280
bankrupted the province ontario isn't so much debt they just don't have money for this ontarians just
00:24:38.560
don't care they're just not that political appetite there for change that you see in other provinces
00:24:43.120
like bc like alberta and so i think he's going to get away with it isaac isaac isaac i just wanted to
00:24:49.600
ask you uh ford has you know he has this message about ontarians need a leader need leadership etc and i i
00:24:58.400
guess he's sort of hinting that it's not coming from the federal government which is true because we
0.91
00:25:02.960
we have a lame duck as prime minister but how different are ford's proposals actually from the
00:25:11.200
federal governments because it seems to line up here the the whole pandemic style measures is being
00:25:16.640
floated at the federal level and here we have uh ford floating it at the provincial level as well
00:25:23.120
yeah it seems like ford likes to uh mirror the federal governments when it comes to payouts of course
00:25:29.120
here with the pandemic and then when uh the the liberals had their gst hst proposals ford was
00:25:35.760
uh mentioning that he would do the same thing in the province and by the way i've seen the if we
00:25:40.400
recall the polling from those gst tax breaks it pushed people further away from the liberal party
00:25:45.280
than it did anything to attract them but overall i just have to say ford this is a complete messaging
00:25:50.320
failure on two fronts firstly the pandemic style measures i mean there are lengthy reports on that from from
00:25:59.360
uh parliament that show that i mean these were so mismanaged like serb for example how many uh
00:26:05.680
payments went out to ineligible recipients i mean it's it's in the billions i'm pretty sure if i
00:26:09.760
recall the report correctly like in no way should anyone be saying that they'll do a similar style
00:26:15.840
structure to what we saw with the pandemic style payments that have are still having an effect a
00:26:20.480
negative effect on our economy i don't know why he would say that and then in regard to the mandate
00:26:24.880
thing too ford currently has a majority government in ontario so he has uh 79 seats and for a majority
00:26:31.920
you need 63 so he has a majority and then he's polling at 91 which is also a majority maybe even
00:26:38.240
a super majority i don't know the percentage but what what change in mandate does that give you ford you
00:26:44.160
are going to be in the exact same position you're currently and it's not like his term is ending in
00:26:48.080
a month he has what two years left on his term so i really don't understand the mandate or messaging
00:26:53.440
either it really seems like a communication failure here from ford on those two fronts which are
00:27:02.480
i mean i have to say we talk about ford and how bad his messaging is and how much he sucks but like
0.70
00:27:07.120
at the same time what he's doing is totally working for him because he keeps on getting reelected and as
00:27:11.920
we've mentioned he's gonna probably get like a super majority in the next government i think that
00:27:16.240
it's bad faith tactics i don't think the ontario people can afford what he's doing but at the same
00:27:21.520
time i think it's gonna pay off for him he's gonna have another four year of a super majority
00:27:25.440
maybe he wants to lock this election and now before people really begin to feel the effect of
00:27:30.640
tariffs on their pocket maybe he thinks hey you know what these tariffs are coming and with donald
00:27:34.800
trump and obviously he could be coming here for four years i do not want to be up at the polls again
00:27:38.480
in two years with the impact of two years of tariffs on the ontario manufacturing industry
00:27:44.480
so let's go to the polls now like i don't think that his obviously he's disingenuous when he's saying
00:27:50.160
i need to get another mandate but at the same time it's it's smart politics and it's working
00:27:55.520
for him at the same time even as wrong as i think it is and certainly you know the people of ontario i
00:28:00.800
have some sympathy for them but like i said there doesn't seem to be any real desire for change there
00:28:05.600
cause but i'll leave you with the last word sure uh with the mandate stuff i assume he's very well
00:28:14.960
aware that once these tariffs come into place and whatever measures pan out there will be a decline
00:28:21.200
in popularity um he might fear that he might not get re-elected following immediately after this
00:28:29.200
this circumstance in this trade war with the united states because everybody's going to take a hit
00:28:35.760
and political measures as they stand are not suitable uh to really counteract the impacts and
00:28:45.040
additionally the debt burden that we could take if we're going to impose pandemic style measures to
00:28:51.600
counter set these tariffs is going to be huge and that's not going to sit well with the average voter
00:28:57.200
very well said well everyone thank you for joining us on this friday i hope you guys have a great
00:29:04.080
weekend and don't forget that everything you heard today was off the record
00:29:13.520
you guys want to hear a funny anecdote just last weekend i had a friend uh who lives in ontario and he
00:29:19.680
was an electrician like a practicing electrician fully licensed and he just moved to the united
00:29:25.840
states yeah that's awesome yeah like people just went down 30 percent people uh people kind of get
00:29:33.840
upset like in ontario and they're like what do you mean like rachel like i want things to change to be
00:29:37.520
different it's like well the like efforts from like the conservatives i don't mean the pcs but like the
00:29:42.160
actual conservatives to organize has been pretty abysmal they just seem to not be able to work
00:29:47.040
together so we have ford and i mean they also have the gta so they're probably pretty screwed either
00:29:53.120
way rachel you mentioned that ford might not win in two years if we had to face the terrace for two
00:29:57.920
years i mean we will have much bigger problems if we are subject to those tariffs for two years
00:30:02.240
polyefra already said 25 of canadians living in poverty and we know we've seen the data too on
1.00
00:30:07.920
how close people are to being on that edge of poverty if those tariffs come in i mean that
00:30:12.800
number could double we trust me we have much bigger concerns than that election if those tariffs
00:30:17.840
do come through and last for an extended period of time the thing with ford that i've kind of suspect
00:30:24.240
that mimics the federal liberals is that he has a very very good like ground game when it comes to
00:30:32.240
campaigning and the infrastructure he has in ontario like with ford fest and like all the support he can
00:30:39.440
get is is really really like impressive and it's hard there's just no compare i don't think the ndp and
00:30:46.160
liberals are anywhere close to matching that ground game and the federal liberals also have that or like
00:30:52.640
traditionally do but they're this like polit it's just the political circumstance they're in i don't
00:30:59.040
think it's gonna alleviate the amount of distaste that people have for them