Juno News - May 21, 2022


What should Ontario conservatives do this election?


Episode Stats


Length

49 minutes

Words per minute

193.20226

Word count

9,525

Sentence count

579

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Hate speech

14

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Coming up, New Blue Party of Ontario leader Jim Carajalios joins the show to talk about the upcoming election, urban student debt, Canada's place in the world, and whether it can join the ranks of the great powers.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Welcome to Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show.
00:00:05.360 This is the Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:10.800 Coming up, new blue party of Ontario leader Jim Carajalios joins the show to talk about the upcoming election
00:00:17.060 and also Urban Student talking about Canada's place in the world and whether it can join the legions of great powers.
00:00:23.840 The Andrew Lawton Show starts right now.
00:00:27.100 Hello and welcome to the Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:30.320 This is Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show here on True North.
00:00:33.960 The Andrew Lawton Show, good to have you aboard the program here on Friday, May 20th, 2022.
00:00:39.820 It is a long weekend. Hope you have great things planned, getting together with the family, having a barbecue, opening the cottage, whatever the case may be.
00:00:47.720 And one thing that I want to bring up that I think is very important here, I am not here right now.
00:00:53.560 This is not live. I am, as this comes out on a plane to Zurich, Switzerland, where, as I mentioned in the previous couple of shows,
00:01:01.220 I am going to then rent a car and head on over through the Swiss Alps to Davos to cover the World Economic Forum's annual meeting.
00:01:09.340 And this is something that I'm very much looking forward to.
00:01:12.180 I've had people, literally, I've had people just come up and stop me and say,
00:01:14.860 I hear you're going to Davos, good for you. I'm supporting you.
00:01:17.780 So thank you to all of you for doing that.
00:01:19.980 Like I said, I make no promises about what coverage is going to look like.
00:01:23.640 I do know, because the agenda came out, that Francois-Philippe Champagne, Canada's Industry and Innovation Minister,
00:01:29.940 is going to be speaking about the jobs of tomorrow.
00:01:32.920 So we'll have to cover that session.
00:01:34.660 Haven't yet seen any other Canadian cabinet ministers on the speaking agenda.
00:01:38.880 But I know from past summits they've had, these things tend to change.
00:01:42.780 And they morph over time as the event nears and even during the week.
00:01:47.000 So we'll keep an eye out for that.
00:01:48.860 But I do want to just say thank you to all of you who have chipped in to support this.
00:01:54.020 If you want to do so now, you can head on over to donate.tnc.news.
00:01:58.100 It's not, I mean, we're doing our best to keep costs down.
00:02:00.520 I'm going alone.
00:02:01.540 But it's not an inexpensive undertaking.
00:02:03.880 So we're doing this because we feel that there is a story here.
00:02:07.220 And we want to get past the conspiracy theories and past the people that are just dismissive
00:02:11.780 because they think any criticism is a conspiracy theory.
00:02:14.620 And actually talk about, in their own words, what it is that they're doing.
00:02:18.060 And how Canada has really tried to hitch itself to the so-called Davos agenda voluntarily.
00:02:24.320 Again, we're not talking about puppet masters here.
00:02:26.480 We're talking about an ideological framework that leaders like Justin Trudeau are all too
00:02:31.120 happy to take up.
00:02:32.200 So that's why we're going.
00:02:33.440 We'll have lots of coverage of that in the days ahead and the next week as I am on the
00:02:38.300 ground in Davos.
00:02:39.520 So thanks again to those who have supported that.
00:02:41.340 I want to shift gears a little bit and do a follow-up to a discussion we had yesterday
00:02:45.780 on the show with Derek Sloan, leader of the Ontario Party.
00:02:50.220 And as I mentioned at the beginning of that show, originally what I wanted to do was have
00:02:53.940 Derek Sloan as the leader of the Ontario Party and Jim Carajalios as leader of the New
00:02:58.720 Blue Party on at the same time.
00:03:00.380 Because I've been fielding emails from a lot of conservatives, and I use that with a small
00:03:04.980 C voters that don't know how to navigate having these two upstart parties that it seems like
00:03:10.680 on the surface, and we'll dig into this in this discussion, are going after the same
00:03:14.940 voters and talking about a lot of the same issues.
00:03:17.480 So we had that.
00:03:18.900 And obviously the topic of unity between these two parties came up a lot in that interview.
00:03:24.320 Derek Sloan made a number of accusations against the New Blue and against Jim Carajalios,
00:03:29.340 which is why I wanted to have the two on at the same time.
00:03:32.980 And then I had said during the show I was going to extend an invitation to Jim Carajalios
00:03:37.500 to come on to respond.
00:03:39.540 And I am very pleased to have Jim here now.
00:03:41.820 Jim, good to talk to you.
00:03:42.620 Thanks for coming on today.
00:03:44.420 It's always good to be on, Andrew.
00:03:46.080 It's unfortunate we haven't been on for a couple of years, but it's good to be back.
00:03:49.540 Yeah, I mean, I've talked about a lot of the themes that you have been beating the
00:03:54.060 drum about as well.
00:03:54.840 When it comes to the lack of independence of MPPs, we had both you and Belinda on when
00:03:59.740 the party was formed and when she was kicked out of caucus.
00:04:02.540 But right now we're seeing a fracturing of the conservative movement more broadly here.
00:04:09.520 And I want to be clear, I'm not talking about just the conservative party.
00:04:12.700 But let's just begin for people that aren't as familiar.
00:04:15.300 Is the New Blue trying to be a more conservative version of the PC party?
00:04:20.420 Or is it trying to be a PC party without the negatives and the corruption you've identified
00:04:26.040 within that party or something else entirely?
00:04:28.520 Well, the PC party is not a conservative right of center party anymore.
00:04:31.480 They've made it very clear with the budget they released before the election started.
00:04:35.320 And just this week, like the last couple of days, Andrew, they're bragging about cutting
00:04:39.580 deals with labor bosses, Andrew.
00:04:42.580 They're bragging about it.
00:04:44.260 We've got the labor bosses in our pockets. 0.99
00:04:47.260 And the lobbyists online are bragging about it.
00:04:49.580 It's great for the PC party.
00:04:50.800 They are going after left-wing voters.
00:04:53.440 They are now transformed into being the wing in Ontario of the Just and Trudeau Liberal Party
00:04:59.560 of Canada.
00:05:00.400 And they've extended the legacy of the begin-to-win Liberals.
00:05:02.740 Now, a lot of Ontario voters are just being made aware of this because a lot of people
00:05:07.720 are busy working, taking their kids to school in the four years.
00:05:11.000 And they check into politics like normal people when there's a campaign, not like us junkies
00:05:15.300 who are following it probably a little too closely.
00:05:17.340 But more and more, increasingly, people are noticing that the PC party holds their traditional
00:05:21.880 base and their values and principles that they claim to have.
00:05:26.060 When you ran, Andrew, in 2018 as a candidate, they have contempt for those values and principles.
00:05:32.060 So it's not just about the corruption, but that's what unifies people behind the New
00:05:36.180 Blue Party is the lack of integrity in the process, the fact that you can't speak up in 0.90
00:05:41.140 a grassroots way and influence the process in the PC party.
00:05:44.660 And there's no one else to go to vote for on June 2nd.
00:05:47.440 And when Belinda got ejected and 19 of us got ejected from the Cambridge PC Riding Association,
00:05:51.900 we formed the New Blue Party a year and a half ago.
00:05:54.920 And in our first election, we got 124 names on 124 ballots across the province.
00:06:01.280 You mentioned a few moments ago, I think, the painful point of politics, which is that
00:06:05.060 the freaks that live in this world, like you and I and a lot of the people who tune into
00:06:09.380 this show, are a lot more connected and engaged on these issues year round than the average
00:06:13.780 voter, which touches on the point I made a couple of moments ago, that a lot of voters
00:06:17.060 don't know how to navigate having multiple parties that are presenting themselves as conservative
00:06:22.240 options.
00:06:22.900 And when I reached out to your communications director, because I wanted to help the viewers
00:06:28.060 sort this out, I was told, and you can correct me if this is representative of your view or
00:06:32.460 not, that there was no interest in debating or discussing on a panel with Derek Sloan,
00:06:37.460 because there was basically a refusal to accept that as a legitimate party.
00:06:41.800 So how do we go from that to you wanting to respond to things that Derek Sloan is saying?
00:06:48.840 That's not my view on your invitation.
00:06:51.260 We asked you to invite all the parties, because we're not running an election campaign against
00:06:55.500 Derek Sloan and the fraudulent things that he says, and he has said for months.
00:07:00.380 We're running against the PCs, the NDP, the Liberals and the Greens.
00:07:04.080 And Derek Sloan decided four months ago, he wanted to run candidates against the new Blue 0.81
00:07:08.320 Party.
00:07:08.960 That's not what we're doing.
00:07:09.860 That's not what we've been doing on social media for two years, on our radio ads, on
00:07:14.820 our literature and our lawn signs.
00:07:16.120 We're running against the establishment parties.
00:07:18.540 So I made the instructions very clear.
00:07:21.220 Ask Andrew to reach out to the establishment parties and set up an all-candidates meeting.
00:07:26.100 And if the Ontario party is invited, we'll do that.
00:07:28.180 Some of our candidates have been invited locally to all-candidates meetings, and some Ontario
00:07:32.120 party candidates are there.
00:07:33.260 That's great.
00:07:34.000 So that's our view.
00:07:34.860 Now, when it comes to Derek Sloan, Derek Sloan's a fraud.
00:07:37.340 That's where you start with on the occasion.
00:07:39.500 Derek Sloan's claim to fame in 2020 was that he achieved $300,000 in donations to be on
00:07:47.920 the ballot of the Conservative Party candidate.
00:07:49.840 Remember that?
00:07:51.160 You remember?
00:07:51.860 Yes.
00:07:52.400 No one knew who Derek Sloan was, except for people locally in his riding before then.
00:07:56.600 And he just submitted his financial return to elections candidate.
00:08:01.620 He brought this up.
00:08:02.480 I've never brought this up before.
00:08:04.120 He made false allegations on your show that I've brought up his financial record.
00:08:08.380 I never have.
00:08:09.020 But since he's brought it up and made false allegations against me, let's go deep dive into
00:08:13.460 that.
00:08:13.680 You know that he never raised the $300,000 that he claims to have raised to get on the
00:08:18.840 ballot in the Conservative leadership race, the one that I got kicked out of when I was in
00:08:22.020 third place, he had to get $75,000 worth of loans and go to the bank and get a line of
00:08:27.860 credit, all public information now on his filing, to get from $200,000 plus to $300,000.
00:08:33.580 So consistently since 2020, Derek Sloan has been a fraud in everything that he's pitched
00:08:38.520 forward.
00:08:39.240 And I haven't seen the return you're referencing, but this is within the rules of the party because
00:08:43.340 they approved him as a candidate, I presume, correct?
00:08:45.280 Well, you'll have to ask the party about that because when I was in the race, no one ever
00:08:50.200 thought you could take a bank loan to get the $300,000.
00:08:53.220 Apparently, you had to raise the money to get the $300,000, but a loophole was exposed for
00:08:57.900 Derek Sloan, not in the rules that that could be allowed, but the party made a cut for Derek
00:09:02.320 Sloan.
00:09:02.720 And he stayed in the race, despite the fact that he said very inflammatory things in
00:09:06.960 that race.
00:09:07.460 And you remember, Andrew, we got, you interviewed me at the time I got kicked out twice out of
00:09:11.360 that race.
00:09:11.820 So there's always been a cloud on Derek Sloan as to like, what's he about?
00:09:16.680 Because what he says is never the truth.
00:09:20.460 It's always two degrees or complete fabrication of what's really going on.
00:09:24.900 And he decided to get into provincial politics.
00:09:27.860 And you did a great job of exposing the fact that he's jumping around federal politics, Alberta,
00:09:32.600 independent, provincial politics in Ontario.
00:09:34.980 And he said on your show on June 2nd, June 3rd, he's probably not interested in sticking around
00:09:39.280 in provincial politics.
00:09:40.040 Maybe he'll run for the leadership of the United Conservative Party of Alberta next, Andrew.
00:09:44.440 Who knows with Derek Sloan?
00:09:45.940 He's all over the place.
00:09:47.360 But one thing is consistent.
00:09:48.860 Everything he says and everything he said on your show is a lie, totally, from the meetings
00:09:54.380 that he claims were set up and how they went down to how the process unfolded, where he
00:10:01.620 decided to jump in last minute.
00:10:03.240 And it's unfortunate because for years, when I talk about things like 2018, when I ran for
00:10:09.300 president, you were there, Andrew.
00:10:10.880 And that was a rigged convention.
00:10:12.480 They rigged it.
00:10:13.600 They stuffed the ballots.
00:10:14.620 People voted more than once.
00:10:15.700 I can't get a hearing from anyone, mainstream media or outside, that'll allow me to discuss
00:10:21.220 the ins and outs because that's inside baseball.
00:10:23.480 But now we're going to spend time with less than two weeks to go until June 2nd to talk
00:10:27.700 about inside baseball and what Derek Sloan's up to.
00:10:30.520 And that was by design.
00:10:31.780 Him and his friends in the back who have connections to the PC party, they wanted this narrative.
00:10:36.800 And, you know, they've been half effective in doing it for this June 2nd election.
00:10:41.000 We're talking about, in putting you and Derek up front right now, we're talking about two
00:10:46.240 people that have had to experience a lot of the same tricks from the establishment.
00:10:51.680 You've both been, I mean, he's been kicked out of caucus.
00:10:53.960 You were disqualified from the race.
00:10:55.740 So I don't think it's believable to say that this is actually a guy that has a secret deal
00:11:01.560 with the establishment when he's been rebuked by that establishment in very similar ways
00:11:06.140 to how you have been.
00:11:07.320 He got kicked out by Aaron O'Toole.
00:11:08.840 After Aaron O'Toole had enough with him.
00:11:12.060 But in that entire leadership, Derek Sloan forced his attacks and focused his attacks
00:11:17.920 on Leslie Lewis.
00:11:19.400 And he had nothing negative to say about Aaron O'Toole except for one email on a carbon tax,
00:11:23.420 which he criticized all of them.
00:11:24.980 So you may not think it's believable, but I've lined up the facts.
00:11:28.280 And it's available on newblowontario.com because he decided to decline having a meeting
00:11:33.120 with me in the fall when I reached out to him and create this party.
00:11:36.460 And what he's done for four months is exactly what he says he doesn't do, smear and attack.
00:11:42.760 And he likes that kind of thing as a weaselly way, doing it behind the scenes.
00:11:46.860 But when I bring it out to the public and the forefront, he doesn't like it.
00:11:50.580 He doesn't like being held accountable.
00:11:51.780 So he thinks it's OK for him in a leadership to repeatedly attack Leslie Lewis over and over
00:11:58.240 again.
00:11:58.740 I mean, she's not perfect, Andrew, but certainly better than Aaron O'Toole.
00:12:02.260 She would have been as leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. 0.54
00:12:04.760 But Derek Sloan decided he was going to attack Leslie Lewis in that race so that 20% of his
00:12:08.840 voters could go to Aaron O'Toole on the up ballot.
00:12:12.640 But when we call out Derek Sloan when he decides to run Canada against the new blue, he doesn't
00:12:18.180 like it.
00:12:18.680 He doesn't like his record being put on the table.
00:12:22.000 And he got kicked out of caucus once.
00:12:24.480 The history of me and Belinda in the Conservative movement goes back to 2017 when I was sued by
00:12:30.800 the PC party.
00:12:31.900 Then in 2018, they rigged a presidential race against us.
00:12:35.300 Then I got kicked out of the federal race twice by a LEOC that was run predominantly by
00:12:40.660 Caroline Maroney's campaign team.
00:12:42.560 And then my wife got kicked out of the PC caucus two weeks later. 0.97
00:12:46.740 And 19 of us got kicked out of the PC party in Cambridge.
00:12:49.920 And do you know, oh, do you know who was on that PC executive with Brian Patterson, Andrew,
00:12:54.740 who voted in favor of kicking me and Belinda and 17 others out of the Cambridge PC Riding
00:12:58.920 Association undemocratically?
00:13:01.120 Derek Sloan's riding president at the federal level.
00:13:04.160 He was on that executive.
00:13:05.820 But Derek doesn't like to say that.
00:13:07.300 He doesn't like to talk about his record and what he's done behind the scenes and who
00:13:11.360 he's working with behind the scenes.
00:13:13.680 So this is where we get to the crux of this.
00:13:16.400 And I get your emails.
00:13:17.540 I get all the party's emails.
00:13:18.860 And the amount of time that you spend talking about these issues and similar issues, when
00:13:24.880 you say your opponent is Doug Ford's PCs, makes it look like you're either threatened
00:13:29.980 or bothered by it.
00:13:31.340 So is that an accurate assessment by this party that you say has it out for you?
00:13:36.860 Not threatened.
00:13:38.240 But when someone makes allegations, it's important to answer to them.
00:13:42.720 Don't you think, Andrew?
00:13:43.940 Absolutely.
00:13:45.080 Absolutely.
00:13:45.780 But when we're talking about unity, both you and Derek say at the genesis of it that you
00:13:51.500 were open to this.
00:13:52.520 So you've both provided or your parties have both provided records of text messages going
00:13:57.780 back months about that meeting you referenced.
00:14:00.400 The Ontario party says that they called off that meeting, which it sounds like was going
00:14:04.540 forward when you went on the attack against Randy Hillier.
00:14:08.120 Is that accurate?
00:14:09.100 Is that why that meeting broke down?
00:14:11.320 You'll have to ask them.
00:14:13.300 We had two meetings with Pastor Michael Thiessen booked and Mike Thiessen canceled them.
00:14:18.540 Prior to that, we had been talking to Mike Thiessen and updating him inside information
00:14:23.300 on the New Blue Party of Ontario.
00:14:25.940 And Mike Thiessen came to a lunch meeting with a couple other pastors, including Pastor Aaron
00:14:29.900 Rock, looked us in the eye and said they were for the New Blue Party.
00:14:34.360 And they said, would you invite Randy Hillier?
00:14:36.660 Would you let Roman Baber in?
00:14:37.920 Would you let others in?
00:14:39.280 I said, sure.
00:14:40.080 And if they want to be the leader, let's have a leadership race. 0.96
00:14:42.260 And he came out of that meeting looking us in the eye, you know, quoting the Bible,
00:14:47.400 because that's what they do when they want you to believe them.
00:14:49.980 And they came out of that meeting and he ran off to a couple of events with Randy Hillier,
00:14:54.700 where Randy Hillier announced he was going to start a provincial party.
00:14:58.300 And when Randy Hillier's provincial party fell apart, well, first those meetings got canceled,
00:15:03.500 where I said to Derek, let's sit down, you and me, back in the fall.
00:15:06.420 And Derek Sloan swore to me on the phone he was sticking with federal politics, not interested
00:15:10.220 in provincial.
00:15:10.620 I even offered Derek and his wife to start the New Blue Riding Association in Hastings.
00:15:15.740 I said, maybe one of you would want to run.
00:15:17.960 Like, let's just sit down, have a coffee.
00:15:19.320 They canceled those meetings.
00:15:21.180 And after that, Mike Thiessen went into work behind the scenes to start a party with Derek
00:15:26.560 Sloan.
00:15:26.980 And it's interesting because Derek Sloan keeps preaching this unity.
00:15:32.040 But in every step he's taking federally or provincially, he's not interested in unity.
00:15:36.640 He couldn't work with Max Bernier after being in a caucus with Max Bernier.
00:15:40.620 He decided he can't run for Max.
00:15:43.280 And while I was sick, fighting cancer, and getting back on my feet, getting the cancer
00:15:48.260 out of my body, learning how to walk again, him and Randy and Max were touring around in
00:15:53.740 a caucus.
00:15:54.520 Right?
00:15:55.300 And here we are, two and a half years later, after Belinda was the first to stand up and
00:16:00.180 say, Doug Ford's lockdown bill is wrong.
00:16:02.120 Randy picked up on it.
00:16:03.360 Derek picked up on it.
00:16:04.440 And Max was campaigning on it.
00:16:06.140 Those three guys were in a caucus together.
00:16:09.340 And Derek couldn't get along with them.
00:16:11.740 So Randy Hillier is not part of Derek Sloan's party.
00:16:14.840 Derek Sloan wanted to run against Max Bernier federally.
00:16:17.940 But somehow it's everyone else's fault.
00:16:21.140 It's not Derek Sloan's fault.
00:16:22.540 And it's not the people behind them.
00:16:24.540 He has my phone number.
00:16:26.020 He could have picked up the phone at any time in the last seven months.
00:16:29.020 The last time he called me was to tell me he was leading a provincial party in Ontario
00:16:33.840 against the new blue.
00:16:35.420 There was no discussion on working together.
00:16:37.720 There was never a proposal.
00:16:39.440 There was never, I want to be the leader of a party.
00:16:41.400 There was nothing.
00:16:41.900 And he's doing it specifically to waste our time and respond to these things and to try
00:16:48.080 to stall us and our momentum going into June 2nd.
00:16:51.040 Now, you mentioned earlier that one of your, I say grievances, and I wouldn't read too much
00:16:56.520 into that, but one of your frustrations is that the Ontario party is running candidates
00:17:00.060 against new blue.
00:17:01.000 Now, one of the topics that came up in my discussion with Derek yesterday is that he had tried to
00:17:05.300 perhaps make an arrangement where you weren't running candidates against each other.
00:17:08.900 You'd have your own parties, you'd have your own leaders, but you wouldn't be galvanizing
00:17:12.780 each other's support.
00:17:13.700 And new blue has posted its response to the request for a meeting on that and derided it
00:17:19.600 as a secret backroom deal.
00:17:21.200 The same sort of thing that you say happens in the PCs.
00:17:23.660 Would that not have been an example of a positive discussion that you could have around unity?
00:17:29.480 Why was that meeting, which I think sounds like an entirely fair topic to broach between
00:17:35.220 two party leaders, why is that something that you felt was offensive to democracy?
00:17:39.920 Is it a realistic option, Andrew?
00:17:42.340 So the new blue party of Ontario has thousands of members and donors.
00:17:46.320 Do you know how many members the Ontario party has?
00:17:48.320 Zero.
00:17:48.520 I don't know.
00:17:49.400 Zero.
00:17:49.680 They don't have membership in their party.
00:17:52.020 And he talks about integrity and transparency and democracy.
00:17:55.620 He doesn't have one member of his party.
00:17:58.400 It's Derek Sloan.
00:17:59.820 They had a party constitution, this Ontario party that they created in 2018.
00:18:04.500 And they were going around telling us in 2020, when they were trying to talk to us about
00:18:10.200 taking over the Ontario party, that we're not allowed to change their party of constitution
00:18:14.540 or the party name.
00:18:15.900 This is what the board of the Ontario party, all two of them were saying.
00:18:19.580 And then they tore up that party of constitution and just put a new one in because there's
00:18:23.200 no members.
00:18:23.740 So they don't need to have a vote.
00:18:24.780 New blue party started a year and a half ago.
00:18:26.980 We've got thousands of members and donors riding presidents in place.
00:18:30.400 We have a board that makes decisions.
00:18:32.760 It's not the Derek Sloan show and his buddies in the back that remain nameless and secret.
00:18:37.940 So when he rebuffs us in September and October, and I tried to put it all aside, I said, you
00:18:43.720 know what?
00:18:44.400 Derek Sloan had a spy on my leadership team who set me up to send an email out and he
00:18:49.280 was working with Aaron O'Toole.
00:18:50.440 And we have people in the new blue team that worked on Derek Sloan's leadership and have
00:18:55.920 told me firsthand that he was on the phone with Aaron O'Toole coordinating attacks against
00:19:00.060 Lesley Lewis in that federal leadership.
00:19:02.160 But you know what?
00:19:02.880 I said, let bygones be bygones, okay?
00:19:05.500 And let me reach out to Derek on election day federally when it's not going to turn out
00:19:10.360 all well, okay?
00:19:11.200 And then I asked for a meeting.
00:19:13.020 Let's have a meeting.
00:19:13.780 And the meetings kept getting pushed off.
00:19:15.680 And then he came back in February or March, not him phoning me because, you know, he's
00:19:22.500 not a standup guy, so he can't pick up the phone.
00:19:24.220 He has other people saying, let's reach out to the new blue and let's tell them you guys
00:19:29.360 now have over a hundred candidates in place.
00:19:31.360 Well, we want you to stand down a bunch of your candidates.
00:19:34.920 So he wants me to issue an edict and act like Doug Ford does in his party and appoint candidates
00:19:40.880 and say, we're not running a full slate anymore because Derek Sloan has decided to show up
00:19:45.160 and he's going to scramble and put in candidates last minute, even though he has no brand awareness,
00:19:50.840 no literature, no platform, no lawn signs, nothing.
00:19:53.540 That is the most destructive proposal for a new party that anyone can think of.
00:19:58.780 And the only reason he would do that is to sabotage our efforts, not to work together.
00:20:03.300 Working together would be to say, wow, Jim and Belinda have been building this for over
00:20:07.000 a year, despite the fact that Jim was sick and they're back on their feet.
00:20:10.980 And I want to run provincially now because my time in federal politics didn't work out
00:20:15.940 so well.
00:20:16.340 So let me approach them about running federal provincially in Ontario.
00:20:20.020 He never did that.
00:20:20.940 He wasn't interested.
00:20:21.960 And in fact, when he was approaching us for a meeting, him and Rick Nichols hadn't even
00:20:26.780 committed to running in the provincial election.
00:20:29.000 They were asked and they were saying, well, we're still not sure if we're going to run the
00:20:31.920 provincial election.
00:20:32.560 So that letter that you unfortunately put up on your screen yesterday's show, fake news
00:20:37.520 is what that was, was a proposal for me to cancel a bunch of our candidates in favor of candidates
00:20:45.240 who don't agree with the new blue, who don't want to run on the new blueprint, which are
00:20:49.960 stuff like scrapping the $100 million per vote taxpayer subsidy of political parties in
00:20:55.160 Ontario, banning lobbyists from internal party politics, getting rid of the Toronto Star's
00:21:01.100 online gambling license, fighting against critical race theory and the petition that Belinda
00:21:06.540 read in the legislature that unfortunately, Derek Sloan and Rick Nichols didn't want to
00:21:10.240 promote Rick Nichols voted in favor of bill 67.
00:21:13.080 This is the critical race theory bill.
00:21:14.440 Yeah.
00:21:14.700 Yeah.
00:21:15.060 All those things that we're talking about, Derek Sloan and his candidates don't want to
00:21:17.860 talk about, don't want to talk about wind turbines and high electricity rates.
00:21:21.320 And he wanted me to cancel a bunch of our candidates going into our first election so we don't
00:21:25.760 run a full slate.
00:21:26.620 And that's a sabotage tactic.
00:21:28.280 So let's take the bigger picture look here.
00:21:31.800 You're a voter.
00:21:32.920 You are one of those people that we talked about at the beginning, Jim, that barely can
00:21:36.580 muster enough energy and interest and time to pay attention to the normal politics of
00:21:41.420 the liberal, the NDP, the PCs, let alone these new parties that don't yet have the name
00:21:45.920 recognition.
00:21:47.080 How are you supposed to come into this and see what just seems like a lot of people that
00:21:53.200 aren't willing to get along, that aren't able to put the cause of freedom forward?
00:21:56.660 Whoever is to blame, how is a voter supposed to work their way through this and have any
00:22:01.900 confidence that we could have the freedom-centered alternative that all of the people in the
00:22:07.500 Ontario party and the New Blue claim to want?
00:22:09.680 How is a voter supposed to navigate through this?
00:22:11.920 The voters that are looking for an option against the establishment have united against the
00:22:18.760 New Blue Party of Ontario.
00:22:20.340 And you're right.
00:22:21.240 If Derek Sloan united against or for?
00:22:24.120 Sorry, they've united against the PC party and the establishment parties for the New Blue
00:22:28.020 Party of Ontario.
00:22:29.160 We have 124 candidates in the full slate.
00:22:31.800 And we're seeing it locally in Cambridge and the surrounding ridings.
00:22:35.440 Every day we get momentum.
00:22:37.200 And Belinda's up for re-election. 1.00
00:22:38.840 And it's unfortunate what Derek Sloan did.
00:22:41.520 He's confused the issue.
00:22:43.400 He's created confusion for some.
00:22:47.520 But there are over 10 million voters in Ontario.
00:22:50.160 And our goal is to make the New Blue Party raise awareness for the New Blue Party in every
00:22:56.180 single riding in our first election and keep moving forward after June 2nd.
00:23:00.320 And we can't control what guys like Derek Sloan and his buddies that consider themselves important
00:23:05.960 figures in the movement, as he said in your thing, in your interview with him.
00:23:09.960 We are important, important people.
00:23:12.260 And we should be treated important as important people in these meetings.
00:23:16.400 The New Blue Party of Ontario is representing hardworking parents and people in every single
00:23:21.400 riding.
00:23:21.940 And it would be a shame if, because of Derek Sloan's efforts, we fall short in Cambridge
00:23:27.680 and Belinda doesn't get re-elected. 0.99
00:23:29.360 It would be a shame, or in some other ridings.
00:23:32.140 But largely, this is a distraction that has slowed us down a little bit.
00:23:36.480 But there's 10 million more voters in Ontario that we have to look at, Andrew.
00:23:40.560 And all we can do is keep moving forward and keep talking about the things that the establishment
00:23:46.160 parties and Derek Sloan don't want to talk about.
00:23:49.440 And that's how we're getting more and more people interested in the New Blue Party.
00:23:53.240 Will you subject yourself to a leadership review after the election?
00:23:57.160 We have a board, Andrew, and we're going to sit down and the board's going to make a
00:24:01.600 determination.
00:24:02.300 We also have members and we have a party constitution.
00:24:04.800 And there's triggers in place for members and riding associations to have their voices heard
00:24:10.200 on policy.
00:24:10.860 And we're going to have future conventions face to face.
00:24:12.920 We're the only new party that had nominations going into this election.
00:24:19.400 We have members and donors in every single riding.
00:24:22.340 And we are a grassroots party and are committed to that at all aspects.
00:24:26.580 So you're already jumping to the leadership review.
00:24:28.580 We haven't even gone through our first election campaign.
00:24:32.320 But I think the leadership speaks for itself, Andrew.
00:24:35.220 We've put this together in a year and a half, despite some personal battles, despite distractions
00:24:39.340 from guys like Derek Sloan and Randy Hillier.
00:24:42.380 And we're going to keep pushing forward.
00:24:44.300 And on June 2nd, hopefully Belinda will get reelected and others will get elected. 0.65
00:24:50.240 And the best is yet to come in Ontario.
00:24:53.060 I am jumping ahead, but I think it's a relevant question because earlier you said that there was
00:24:56.980 a time when you would have been open to having perhaps a different leader to New Blue if the
00:25:00.920 members chose them.
00:25:01.860 So you as the leader could go to the board and go to the members and say, I'm voluntarily
00:25:05.840 opening up the door to a review of my leadership.
00:25:08.940 And I'm asking if you would do that.
00:25:11.060 Why would I do that now, 12 days before the election?
00:25:14.300 Let's wait until see.
00:25:15.140 It's a commitment to the members that you say are the backbone of your party, that you
00:25:18.640 think they should have a say no matter what happens after this election.
00:25:21.400 If enough members want to have a leadership review, the board would consider it.
00:25:25.580 And of course, I'm very confident in my leadership.
00:25:27.820 I'm the one that's proposed a leadership race for Randy Hillier, for Roman Babber, for
00:25:32.340 Derek Sloan, for whoever wanted it.
00:25:34.280 But we're not going to have a leadership race for someone who's not a member of the
00:25:37.380 party or for a fraud.
00:25:39.340 I'm not talking about a race.
00:25:40.120 I'm talking about a review.
00:25:41.220 If the members want to call for a leadership review, we have triggers in the party to
00:25:46.400 a call for that going to the board.
00:25:48.300 But right now we're focused on June 2nd, Andrew.
00:25:50.660 And you're jumping ahead beyond June 2nd to talk about replacing or reviewing the leader
00:25:56.320 of the party.
00:25:56.940 We still got 12, 13 days left in the election.
00:26:00.000 That's fair.
00:26:00.820 So let me ask you a question I asked Derek yesterday.
00:26:03.300 What do you consider a win?
00:26:04.460 You're a new party.
00:26:05.440 You've talked about this momentum.
00:26:06.680 What do you consider a victory in your scenario for June 2nd?
00:26:10.380 We're very happy with where we're at.
00:26:12.140 We wanted to establish a party for June 2nd because many people, including some of Derek's
00:26:17.280 friends, like Mike Thiessen, said we need another option on June 2nd.
00:26:21.240 And we've already, in our first campaign, have 124 candidates on ballots and 124 ridings.
00:26:27.020 And we were the first to register 124.
00:26:29.940 And so we're very happy with our progress.
00:26:31.760 And our goal has always been clear.
00:26:33.140 Challenge the left, balance the narrative, change the course.
00:26:36.520 And beyond that, it's up to the voters.
00:26:38.340 And we're trying every day getting lawn signs out.
00:26:40.780 We've got a ground game.
00:26:41.960 You'll see the social media pictures.
00:26:43.320 Our candidates are canvassing and raising awareness.
00:26:46.700 And we're going to keep going beyond June 2nd.
00:26:49.600 Derek Sloan's not going to go beyond June 2nd.
00:26:51.840 It doesn't sound like he's committed to it.
00:26:53.340 But we're committed to provincial politics in Ontario for the long term and to keep moving
00:26:58.220 forward.
00:26:59.020 And we'll see what the voters decide on June 2nd.
00:27:02.240 And if all goes well, hopefully Belinda will get reelected and we'll get close to electing
00:27:07.140 other MPPs into Queen's Park so we can continue to change the course and balance and challenge
00:27:12.800 the left.
00:27:13.480 These establishment parties are out of control.
00:27:16.240 If you end up in a situation where you had a couple of new blue MPPs who collectively held
00:27:21.320 the balance of power in the legislature, could you even work with the PCs?
00:27:25.540 Could you even work with this party, given all that you've said about it and your history
00:27:29.660 with that party?
00:27:31.300 Well, there's no deals with the PC party.
00:27:33.660 They break every...
00:27:34.720 They don't even follow their own constitution.
00:27:36.320 They don't even have free and fair votes.
00:27:39.100 So how can you cut a quote unquote deal on an arrangement?
00:27:43.160 You would be making an arrangement with them just like you would with Derek Sloan, knowing
00:27:46.860 that they're going to break it, knowing that they're not going to follow their commitments
00:27:49.960 or keep their commitments, just like Derek Sloan doesn't keep his commitments.
00:27:54.460 And we'd have to look at it vote by vote if that's the case.
00:28:00.360 But we're not getting ahead of ourselves, Andrew.
00:28:03.060 Andrew, we got 13 days left in this election and we're a new party a year and a half in
00:28:08.480 and the PCs and Liberals are brands that are over 100 years old.
00:28:11.980 And there's no shortcut for us.
00:28:14.380 There's no quick zip on the elevator ride from the first floor to the top of the building.
00:28:19.520 We got to do it step by step and the hard way and keep building momentum.
00:28:23.400 And that's what we're going to do.
00:28:25.360 Jim Carajalios, leader of the New Blue Party.
00:28:28.140 Good to talk to you, Jim.
00:28:28.880 Thanks for coming on.
00:28:30.020 Thanks, Andrew.
00:28:30.980 Jim Carajalios, leader of the New Blue Party of Ontario.
00:28:34.620 And what we will do and what I'd like to do if the leaders are available and we've extended
00:28:39.920 invitations to Premier Doug Ford as well is to come on and actually talk about policy.
00:28:44.300 But what I wanted to do this week, as I said at the outset, is help people navigate through
00:28:49.260 the bad blood, the very legitimate bad blood that you see between both.
00:28:54.180 I shouldn't even say legitimate, but the very real bad blood that you see between both of
00:28:57.960 these parties.
00:28:58.580 So I don't know if it's cleared things up for you or made it more difficult to understand
00:29:02.760 which way you want to go as a voter.
00:29:04.160 But all we do is give you the information and you can decide for yourself what to do
00:29:08.360 with it.
00:29:08.800 We've got to take a quick break here.
00:29:10.460 When we come back, we're going to go from the little picture to the big picture and talk
00:29:14.320 about Canada in the world.
00:29:16.140 That's up next with Irvin Student here on The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:29:19.200 Stay tuned.
00:29:22.800 You're tuned in to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:29:28.180 Welcome back to The Andrew Lawton Show here on True North.
00:29:31.720 We often talk about the internal dynamics and divides in Canada, the political fault lines,
00:29:38.080 the cultural fault lines.
00:29:39.600 And these are very important subjects and they can't be discounted even in what I'd like
00:29:43.460 to discuss now.
00:29:44.260 But I do want to take a much, much bigger picture, a global picture here of this country
00:29:49.920 and where it fits into the world and how the domestic and the international, the domestic
00:29:55.040 and the global, how they tend to intersect.
00:29:56.860 And there have been a lot of things I've been reflecting on as I read a book by a great
00:30:01.520 friend of this program, which is Irvin Student, Canada Must Think for Itself, 10 Theses for
00:30:08.160 Our Country's Survival and Success in the 21st Century.
00:30:11.480 So the title right there suggests a level of optimism.
00:30:14.300 But if you look through the books, there are some very clear issues.
00:30:16.880 I don't want to say problems, but certainly challenges and issues that are identified that
00:30:21.160 I want to dig into.
00:30:22.320 Irvin Student joins me on the program again.
00:30:25.040 Irvin, good to talk to you, sir.
00:30:26.140 Thanks for coming on today.
00:30:27.700 Great to be back.
00:30:28.420 Thanks for all your work, Andrew.
00:30:29.760 I want to skip ahead here to one particular thesis that you put forward, and then we
00:30:34.500 can talk about the bigger picture, because I think this one captures what's at stake here.
00:30:38.760 You say, if Canada survives the century, it will be either a great power or a deep vassal
00:30:44.380 state.
00:30:44.820 And when I read through that, what you're saying it sounds like is that, you know, we're
00:30:48.080 on the cusp of something here, but we could go in either direction.
00:30:51.120 And very real challenges facing our lawmakers, our citizens, civil society right now, really
00:30:57.780 affect in a dramatic way what things are going to look like in 2100.
00:31:03.800 That's right.
00:31:04.560 And I should say at the outset, first of all, thanks for your deep curiosity about that thesis.
00:31:10.300 And one ought not to take offense when I say we have a potentially deeply vassalized country
00:31:16.060 in front of us, that's, we're all in a common scenario, but we're coming out of a pandemic
00:31:20.840 that has presented the country with, as I mentioned on your show, seven or eight systems
00:31:25.060 crises.
00:31:25.500 And we're coming into a world in which there's obvious conflict, but more tightly, if you
00:31:29.780 look at our borders, we've got America to the south, China to the west, Russia to the
00:31:35.340 north across the Arctic, and Europe to the east.
00:31:37.500 All told, ACRE is the four point game.
00:31:41.500 And if you do the math, it's 15 combinations of push, pull and pressure on our territory
00:31:46.380 by these great powers at our, at our doorstep and literally at our doorstep.
00:31:50.580 And I say, if we wish to survive, we either have to up our game hugely, in which case we'll
00:31:56.700 become amongst, we'll be among the great powers at our doorstep.
00:32:00.420 And these are at our doorstep, literally, or we have to say, it's just too big for us.
00:32:05.300 And we vassalized even further into the country we know best, the United States, which is the
00:32:11.420 most probable scenario.
00:32:13.560 And it could be a good bet still, but because the United States is far weaker in the world
00:32:18.040 of tomorrow, in my view, far less wise and could even be predatory on us and really push
00:32:23.680 us around in their own interest, it could be very painful indeed.
00:32:27.480 So those are the two scenarios and also suggests, as I mentioned in the book, that we should
00:32:32.620 never again call ourselves a middle power.
00:32:34.560 It is structurally impossible.
00:32:36.020 We either are a deeply vassalized state, in which case, let's not pretend we are an extension
00:32:40.120 of American power for better or worse, or we are a great power amongst the great powers
00:32:44.960 at our doorstep, which requires a huge upping of the level of thinking, resources, and ambition.
00:32:51.660 You know, a line from a movie jumps out when you say that though, you know, and I'm just
00:32:56.180 envisioning Justin Trudeau saying, you know, we're a great power, we're just having trouble
00:32:59.920 getting the word out, you know, because in order to be a great power and to wield that
00:33:04.100 power, you have to have that power respected and accepted and acknowledged elsewhere.
00:33:08.940 And I don't think Canada is there yet.
00:33:10.860 So if we say that point A is where we are now and point C is Canada being a great power,
00:33:17.940 what's point B?
00:33:21.360 Well, we're tending towards A and A minus and A minus minus.
00:33:26.480 I mean, the trajectory is increased vassalization.
00:33:29.960 And with these major powers at our doorstep playing across our territory and the conflict
00:33:33.900 between the United States and China over Meng Wanzhou and even the USMCA is just a small
00:33:40.940 symptom of the great cuts that can happen once these powers start to play across our territory
00:33:45.220 with us unable to play.
00:33:46.820 So we go increasingly vassalized.
00:33:49.100 I don't like to do Twitter feed or rhetoric about power.
00:33:53.780 That's why I say we cannot call ourselves a great power on the structure I present.
00:33:57.120 We're either vassalized or a major power.
00:33:59.840 I want to disabuse also your distinguished listeners of even the idea of a great power
00:34:04.420 because it has a moral connotation.
00:34:06.600 We're either a term setting country or a term, deeply term taking.
00:34:10.140 I would like us to be a term setting country in our own interests and indeed for the world.
00:34:15.080 And that requires well beyond the respect of others or before the respect of others.
00:34:19.540 And this is your point B, resources.
00:34:22.060 And the resources they underpin power and thinking, the thinking of a term setting country,
00:34:28.480 we're not even there, are much more than education.
00:34:31.080 Of course they are education, but they are economic resources, diplomatic relationships richly
00:34:36.220 around the world, military resources, territorial resources, natural resources,
00:34:42.280 population demography, the mix of demography, the commercial product,
00:34:47.380 and many other things besides, including transportation.
00:34:50.520 And all of this needs to be choreographed in the service of a term taking future,
00:34:55.100 term setting future.
00:34:56.560 And if not, then we ought not to pretend.
00:34:58.940 That means we might make a great bet that the United States will yet win this century.
00:35:03.160 Good on us, but we may not survive that century.
00:35:07.000 We may become very miserable and divided indeed.
00:35:10.120 The reverse is a huge investment doubling down on what we need to survive in a century
00:35:15.140 that doesn't promise us anything and in which no country is thinking about Canada.
00:35:18.600 We have to think for ourselves.
00:35:20.560 The preface to thinking for ourselves, all those material resources,
00:35:24.080 which will allow us to think at a higher level.
00:35:27.580 When you look at the global landscape, I mean, including the countries that you've just
00:35:31.200 acknowledged there, obviously size, population size, and GDP are very significant determining
00:35:38.440 factors in overall influence.
00:35:41.840 Government style, it doesn't appear is as much.
00:35:44.580 You've got China, an authoritarian dictatorship.
00:35:47.100 You've got Russia. 0.67
00:35:48.100 You've got the United States.
00:35:49.500 I mean, three vastly different approaches to government, but they all have been in that
00:35:52.700 top echelon as far as powerful nations are concerned.
00:35:56.120 So, I mean, if you are looking at a country like Canada, and you're trying,
00:35:59.580 and I know you have a chapter on the challenge of planning, but if you were to plan Canada's
00:36:03.660 future and really ensure that Canada is, as you mentioned, that term-setting country,
00:36:08.440 you can't overnight control the GDP issue.
00:36:11.340 Population size takes time, and other countries' populations are going to be growing as well.
00:36:16.120 So, the relative advantage might not be there.
00:36:18.920 What is it that you can leverage to become a term-setter?
00:36:22.900 It's a great question, and it's central to the book.
00:36:26.500 And by the way, for your listeners, again, when we say planning, we ought not to be Twitter-ish
00:36:32.380 about it.
00:36:33.000 Every country plans, and Canada better plan properly in a democratic context if we're
00:36:37.760 going to survive beyond tomorrow.
00:36:39.600 What's our big...
00:36:40.020 You're not talking about a command economy.
00:36:41.560 Not a command economy.
00:36:42.180 I'm talking about thinking and resources, which every country needs, and we've had historically.
00:36:46.840 The problem in the 21st century is how do great democracies, federal democracies, no less,
00:36:51.740 plan?
00:36:52.120 How do we think beyond the tweet, beyond our nose, beyond the current crises?
00:36:56.420 Now, what's our big move?
00:36:57.440 The big move I commend in the book, and I think I articulated in part at a keynote at which you
00:37:04.120 were present and colleagues in Calgary a few weeks ago, is that the North is melting.
00:37:10.040 The North is opening up.
00:37:12.020 Our big move in response to climate change is not to imagine from the South or from Toronto
00:37:16.480 or Vancouver or St. John, New Brunswick.
00:37:19.700 They're going to physically somehow transform the climate through domestic action. 0.87
00:37:25.820 Nay, our responsible move is that the Arctic is opening up.
00:37:29.800 We ought to push our imagination northward.
00:37:32.820 Our Arctic, Canadian alone, is the size of the European Union.
00:37:36.540 The population in Canada of that European Union-sized territory, which is 40% of our territory
00:37:42.000 in total, is 115,000.
00:37:44.840 That's the size of Red Deer, Alberta or Ajax, Ontario.
00:37:51.000 That's not enough to do anything with a great respect to all my Arctic colleagues.
00:37:55.200 And at that Arctic space, we have the Russians pushing on us, the Americans, the Chinese in 1.00
00:38:00.140 Greece and the Europeans. 0.99
00:38:01.340 We're surrounded by great powers.
00:38:02.600 How do we embed them in a peaceful framework that makes us rich and saves the world?
00:38:08.260 And the idea is to make our North, through cities like Whitehorse, Inuvik and Yellowknife,
00:38:13.620 the center of the world.
00:38:15.360 And we are the center of the world geographically, just not through the South, where we're an appendix
00:38:19.820 to the bigger empires.
00:38:21.140 Through the North, we are the center of four continents, which provide us with a market
00:38:26.660 size, seven to one in ratio, greater than the American continental market alone, including
00:38:33.420 the American continental market.
00:38:35.020 So it's an economic vision through the North.
00:38:37.300 It's a geopolitical vision of peace, and it is one of national sovereignty, where we assert
00:38:43.240 ourselves in a territory that we would be negligent to ignore.
00:38:47.840 We can't ignore it because then the country will collapse.
00:38:50.300 That requires a shift in our resources and our imagination, our political pressure to the
00:38:56.400 North, where we imagine that everything happens along the American borders.
00:38:59.700 So push it up.
00:39:01.020 And that's our big exit from all the multiple crises coming out of the pandemic as well.
00:39:05.240 It is interesting because going back to, I mean, John A. McDonald's national policy,
00:39:09.840 the greatest challenge in Canada and building a nation was uniting the country east to west
00:39:15.260 from British Columbia to the Maritimes.
00:39:18.100 And that did, I mean, the Maritimes were a little bit later on, but obviously that did
00:39:21.940 happen through rail.
00:39:22.980 We live in an era in which we don't rely on rail travel to get around.
00:39:26.980 Why, I mean, when, I guess, would you say that that fundamental axis shifted from an east-west
00:39:32.360 one to a north-south one?
00:39:34.080 When the book came out.
00:39:37.160 Good answer.
00:39:38.260 It remains the case that our-
00:39:40.520 So it's theoretical at this point.
00:39:42.000 Like there needs to be an attitude shift to recognize this.
00:39:45.120 Absolutely.
00:39:45.940 And unfortunately, the last two years have shown that Canada does not respond at the leadership
00:39:52.500 level, at all levels of government, across the parties to crisis and to my chagrin.
00:39:59.780 So we don't respond with mobilization to crisis.
00:40:03.760 A la différence with the Americans, the Chinese, the Russians, many Europeans, they know how 0.97
00:40:08.420 to mobilize.
00:40:08.940 The Israelis, the Persians, the Turks, they've got a mobilization capacity.
00:40:14.140 We don't have that.
00:40:15.080 So that means that in this great four-point or 15 combination game that I present, we
00:40:21.780 could be crippled very quickly at a strategic level without even moving.
00:40:25.600 So we better seize the moment while we can before it closes or before other of these other
00:40:31.000 more mobilizable countries do it for us in their name.
00:40:34.820 So the part of the book is to change what I call the mental map of our country.
00:40:40.720 Basically, for all Canadians who love our country, educated and less educated doesn't
00:40:45.240 matter.
00:40:46.340 Look at the map.
00:40:47.580 Look at what happens through the South.
00:40:49.220 And as I suggest, as the North opens up, because the melting of the Arctic is a new phenomenon,
00:40:55.160 the rise of China in modern Canada is a new phenomenon.
00:40:59.160 So the axis of activity will be increasingly in the North and the West, which also
00:41:04.820 begins to solve the Western problem or the national unity tension in Canada.
00:41:10.460 Through the North, we are closer to Asia and China in particular than are the Australians.
00:41:16.340 Through the North, we are closer to St. Petersburg and the former Soviet space, including Ukraine,
00:41:22.720 than is Western Europe.
00:41:24.760 Through the North, we are closer to the Nordic states of the European Union than we are from
00:41:29.540 Toronto.
00:41:30.500 And we are close to the United States through Alaska and several other northern states.
00:41:36.020 All told, a market of $2 billion, which is seven times larger than the $330 million or so
00:41:43.480 in the United States today.
00:41:45.440 So it requires a huge change in the imagination.
00:41:48.680 It is exciting for our young people who have suffered most during the pandemic.
00:41:53.300 And it is sufficiently large and urgent to command our resources such that we're able to get
00:41:58.820 out of our deep crises.
00:42:00.020 And there are seven or eight crises that require much more than just road building, tax cuts,
00:42:04.020 or rhetoric.
00:42:05.100 We really need to mobilize.
00:42:06.440 And I think that is sufficiently large to give us an exit and an exciting tomorrow.
00:42:11.340 It's difficult to do anything globally when you have the internal unity challenges.
00:42:17.960 And I know national unity is a very important chapter in this book.
00:42:21.480 And I wanted to ask you about this because you have a lot of countries in the world like
00:42:24.960 Australia and New Zealand that have indigenous populations.
00:42:28.260 You've got countries in the world that have, you know, that are bilingual, Belgium, trilingual,
00:42:34.100 quadrilingual, like Switzerland.
00:42:35.560 I mean, these are not dynamics that are unique to Canada, although Canada does seem to have
00:42:40.220 more of them because we have the indigenous issue.
00:42:43.480 We have the bilingualism.
00:42:45.240 And if you take into account indigenous languages, of which there are many, you've got countless
00:42:50.120 language groups that exist in this country.
00:42:52.640 And then you also have very fundamentally different cultures between French culture and English
00:42:58.180 culture in Canada.
00:42:59.480 And even in English Canada, an Ontarian and a British Columbian and an Albertan, I think,
00:43:04.080 have very different, perhaps less different than a Francophone and an Anglophone.
00:43:08.140 So there are a lot of different things that need to work to keep Canada united.
00:43:13.300 And I think we tend to take for granted that we're all committed to Canada in the same way.
00:43:18.080 How do you solve, if you can, that unity challenge?
00:43:22.060 It's a central question because we must solve our external challenges just as we solve the
00:43:26.880 domestic ones.
00:43:27.540 And you're right.
00:43:28.020 I do treat national unity centrally.
00:43:29.920 In the book, we have four national unity crises coming out of the pandemic.
00:43:35.080 The first one is basic borders dividing the country in regulatory terms, sometimes in physical
00:43:39.720 terms across the jurisdictions.
00:43:41.880 The second one is the Western question, which is still wicked and maybe growing in profile. 0.70
00:43:48.540 The third is the Quebec question is still alive.
00:43:51.280 And if it ever does explode, whatever people think on Twitter, it would compromise the entire
00:43:58.540 country quite quickly.
00:43:59.660 And the fourth one, as you articulate, is the indigenous challenge. 1.00
00:44:03.480 The Western challenge, I articulate, can in part be solved through the North. 0.64
00:44:08.120 The North is the fix to exit, as I argue. 0.95
00:44:11.400 Rather than being pedantic, say we just redistribute or give more resources, more power to the West,
00:44:16.580 the opening of the North to huge markets is psychologically very seductive to the West,
00:44:22.240 which is very attached to at least Yukon and Northwest territories.
00:44:27.380 The Quebec question, I argue, is one to be managed.
00:44:31.520 And I do talk about language in there.
00:44:33.400 I talk about a national languages strategy, which will get us beyond what I think is a very,
00:44:37.860 very low standard hump that we've allowed to occupy our political imagination.
00:44:45.020 You talk about bilingual, trilingual, quadrilingual countries in Europe, and the same is true 1.00
00:44:49.880 in Asia and the Middle East and Africa.
00:44:51.980 We're too obsessed with bilingualism.
00:44:53.800 So I tried to break the logic and say that tomorrow, as we plan education post-pandemic,
00:44:59.860 we ought to imagine that everyone will simply speak English and French without blinking.
00:45:04.100 And then they choose a third language because we need a third language for the indigenous 0.99
00:45:07.900 cause domestically, which helps to address that, but also for our wicked international 0.57
00:45:14.320 circumstance, which I described.
00:45:16.360 I talk about taking lessons from Northern Aboriginal Indigenous self-government treaties.
00:45:23.120 There are something like 26 self-government arrangements in all of Canada, mostly in the
00:45:28.060 North, and they're very, very practical and so far have been productive.
00:45:32.080 And they're much, they're outside of the Indian Act.
00:45:33.960 And I think these are huge examples that we ought to multiply.
00:45:36.600 If only we understood how the North operates.
00:45:40.200 And finally, on the borders to our country that have been erected domestically, that needs
00:45:45.820 to be unwound yesterday.
00:45:47.620 And there must be a commission that assiduously unwinds all of the regulations that were improvised
00:45:54.060 and unfurled on the territory, militating against national unity immediately.
00:45:59.240 We don't have time to go through the book page by page, and I don't think we'd want to because
00:46:04.460 then people don't have a reason to buy it.
00:46:05.880 So do have a look at Canada Must Think For Itself for Yourself, so you can think for yourself
00:46:11.480 about how Canada can think for itself.
00:46:13.560 But I guess if we want to tie what we have covered up in a bow here, Irvin, let me ask
00:46:17.940 you where the responsibility ultimately lies.
00:46:20.920 Because government has to be just as a matter of, not just as a matter of law, but I think
00:46:25.360 is a matter of the law of nature as well, responsive to the people it represents.
00:46:30.120 It needs the consent of the governed.
00:46:31.520 So the government cannot start centrally planning in a way that is unhealthy in a democratic society.
00:46:36.920 But government can certainly guide and government can shepherd.
00:46:40.080 But individual people are the ones that need to decide what they want the future of their
00:46:44.380 country to be.
00:46:45.120 So you've put out the roadmap here.
00:46:47.120 Who do you think it is that is best suited or can take this up and move on these things?
00:46:52.420 History suggests that it will take just a small group of leaders who have bathed in this type 0.99
00:47:00.660 of thinking to move the country.
00:47:02.660 And it can happen very fast.
00:47:03.980 Now when you say leaders, intellectuals, political leaders, media figures, or a combination?
00:47:08.240 All of it.
00:47:08.540 Even if you look at the Quebec Revolution, the Quiet Revolution in the 60s and then in practice
00:47:14.460 in the 70s and 80s, it was executed by a small group of people who were debating and thinking
00:47:19.620 in that unfurled ambition at all levels of society.
00:47:23.360 Politics, obviously, to begin with, politics is central in a good way.
00:47:27.140 So leadership is central.
00:47:28.860 And the converse scenario is devastating for the country.
00:47:32.240 In the absence of such leadership, and unfortunately that's been the case throughout the pandemic,
00:47:36.580 the country could collapse.
00:47:37.940 And I mentioned the 60-year rule there.
00:47:39.760 The countries tend to last an average of 60 years in the modern sense, after which they
00:47:44.260 collapse through domestic or external circumstances.
00:47:47.260 And we're well past due, that means we have to work that much harder to keep our country
00:47:51.540 a going and vital concern.
00:47:53.860 Irvin Student would encourage people to check out his book, Canada Must Think for Itself.
00:47:59.200 Irvin, always a pleasure.
00:48:00.220 Thanks for coming on.
00:48:01.220 Pleasure is mine.
00:48:02.420 That was Irvin Student.
00:48:03.760 Some nice big picture topics as you head into the weekend here.
00:48:07.900 And as I've mentioned at the beginning of the show and in the last couple shows, I am going
00:48:11.960 to be in the next, actually, I might even be on a plane right now, depending on when this
00:48:15.460 comes out.
00:48:15.800 So this one's pre-recorded.
00:48:16.980 As I mentioned on the previous shows and earlier on, I'm actually on my way to Davos,
00:48:21.540 Switzerland.
00:48:21.980 In fact, when this comes out, I might even be on a plane.
00:48:24.340 So I am going to be not doing the regular Andrew Lawton show next week as I cover the
00:48:28.500 World Economic Forum annual meeting.
00:48:30.420 But we will have lots of coverage at True North.
00:48:32.440 So I hope you do stay tuned for that.
00:48:34.140 And we'll talk to you upon my return next week.
00:48:37.200 Hope you have a great weekend.
00:48:38.360 This is the Andrew Lawton show on True North.
00:48:40.440 Thank you.
00:48:40.900 God bless.
00:48:41.480 And good day to you all.
00:48:42.320 Thanks for listening to the Andrew Lawton show.
00:48:45.120 Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.
00:48:50.500 Actionest Participant.
00:48:58.560 Actionest Candidate.
00:48:59.360 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:01.480 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:03.100 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:04.120 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:05.020 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:07.500 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:09.380 Action.
00:49:09.880 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:11.940 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:13.920 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:14.340 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:15.340 Tracy Mun emo redesign.
00:49:16.360 Actionest Candidate.
00:49:17.080 Actionest Candidate.