00:17:40.360This is sort of one of those things that, you know, they're quibbling over who got to
00:17:44.200speak next and who who got oh i was supposed to speak next but somehow this person did even though
00:17:49.160i have this card that says whatever and then and then it all ends with uh smith saying don't call
00:17:54.920me she don't call me a woman i'm i'm a they them um so we'll just uh roll this clip to uh jog your
00:18:00.360memory this is sought eight yes hello i i was standing here with my gender equity card before
00:18:05.640you called on the previous speaker canada cannot and will not be part of the legacy of blood that
00:18:13.320was built in iraq in palestine and now in iran this is a no question debate i call this question
00:18:22.280adam and chairs thank you your points quite well made uh speaker i'll again thank delegates not
00:18:34.600to call me madam chair or madame la president i'm a non-binary person my pronouns are they them and
00:18:39.480there. Chair is sufficient. And with regret, you've spoken to the resolution. It's not open
00:18:49.500to you to also call the question. If the question is the will of the house, someone else must call
00:18:54.580it because we heard from you in substantive debate. Okay, so you get the point, right?
00:19:00.240A lot of quibbling over the very small menu rules, but you can see there that there is some kind of
00:19:05.900an oppression olympics happening here where uh you know the room kind of applauds for her for
00:19:10.540for saying you misgendered me uh she's a long history of this so you wrote about how she was
00:19:14.540caught on tape conducting a struggle session uh back in 2023 with a group of bc public servants
00:19:20.380apparently i mean she's a lawyer she represents human rights um complaints she's an employment
00:19:24.860lawyer so this is this is she's like a professional you know someone who promotes this sort of law
00:19:30.860fair and the the adding adding this gender i don't i don't even know gender infused ideology
00:19:38.620into our laws into our government um she has a sort of long history of being involved we actually
00:19:43.820run a guest piece uh today at juno news by nick osmond jones i believe you know who was basically
00:19:49.340writing about this woman's background all the things she's been involved you should go check
00:19:53.180out that piece over at juno news um but including the fact that on her website it says that if you
00:19:57.980you misgender her during one of her sessions, she will fine you $100. So she's very serious
00:20:02.860about this whole misgendering thing. But again, kind of just like a reminder, these people have
00:20:07.580a lot more power in our society than we really think. You know, we laugh at them, we see these
00:20:10.700videos, it's so absurd that they're actually influencing you. She testified as well in favor
00:20:14.940of Bill C-6, which was a very controversial legislation, not controversial for the MPs,
00:20:19.260they all voted in favor of it. There's unanimous consent in the House of Commons in favor of this
00:20:23.740bill that bans uh what they call conversion therapy but it also bans therapy for gender confused
00:20:30.060um young people that you have to have affirming care so affirming care is like the reverse of
00:20:34.620what you think it means it means that if a person comes in and they're gender confused you have to
00:20:38.300affirm the delusion that they are the opposite gender so again uh uh just you know some someone
00:20:44.780who's actually very involved in uh implementing these kinds of things in in government and in
00:20:50.700in academia as well uh what do you think so the clip you showed was interesting what you cropped
00:20:57.580off the beginning of the clip where the the woman in the kafia she herself identified herself as she
00:21:04.220they uh what's interesting is like a whole bunch of other ndp candidates delegates there even when
00:21:09.900they were talking about everything else under the sun those like it seems like 30 40 50 percent of
00:21:14.700of them uh had some semblance of like they pronouns so it was it was a very odd thing and
00:21:22.360you could tell the whole room wanted to like explode in laughter for this kathia woman who
00:21:26.740was talking about the the war crimes of the united states and it was going to be like this big bonding
00:21:32.920moment and you could see her voice rise to the occasion and then the chair this woman adrian
00:21:38.240smith just like kind of kills it and it's like well let's talk about me actually my pronouns are
00:21:43.300they them and and the whole room is kind of like okay what and then like this sort of this clapping
00:21:50.920for her for her pronouns and it wasn't clear like okay can we go back to clapping about how bad the
00:21:55.520united states is and the whole moment just like became this um extremely awkward sort of example
00:22:06.720of why a fixation on on labels regarding your personal identity it kind of destroys the whole
00:22:16.540group esprit de corps that's the basis of party politics that's the basis of like sports teams
00:22:21.360that's the basis of tightly knit companies it's it should be about a common project but you could
00:22:27.460see that this chair who otherwise you know acquitted herself in a fairly you know she
00:22:33.180she obviously knew like Roger's rules of order and she's citing chapter and verse in terms of
00:22:38.000what people are allowed to talk about like she's very officious and bureaucratic and legal-minded
00:22:42.980when it comes to the actual procedural elements but then when it comes to this sort of en passant
00:22:49.080throwaway remark about Madame Chair she just completely hijacks the conversation and starts
00:22:53.780lecturing people about this non-existent thing called a non-binary identity she's clearly a
00:22:58.460woman. And as you said, she's been known to me since at least 2023, I think, because this
00:23:06.300contributor you have, his name's Nick Osmond-Jones, lives in BC. He, if I remember correctly,
00:23:12.280worked for the BC government or an agency, I think it was an arm's length agency of the BC
00:23:17.320government. And Smith had been brought in in 2021 to lecture everybody about gender weighing
00:23:22.840and gave you know to our presentation about um asexuals and the whole thing is on tape and in
00:23:31.000fact if you go to quillette and read his article we have a link a soundcloud link to it and um
00:23:37.900and then nick asked like some perfectly innocent question well i regarded as innocent and she went
00:23:44.960ballistic and in fact i think this policy that she has on her website about how when she's giving a
00:23:51.060gender weighing training session and somebody's transphobic or misgenders or whatnot that you
00:23:55.720know she charges her client an extra hundred dollars i think it's probably based on what
00:23:59.960nick did because she went ballistic and then um like reported nick to his boss and nick was was
00:24:08.460dragged into the the deputy um the deputy's office and it just became a whole thing and so what was
00:24:16.160supposed to be this kind of it was one of these like friday afternoon box lunch professional
00:24:21.360development sessions supposed to be you know kind of casual but instead it was this maoist struggle
00:24:26.240session about gender weighing and as soon as anybody asked a question that was off base from
00:24:30.720her dogma uh like the first thing she did is she reported this person for discipline which kind of
00:24:37.600you know speaks to the kind of um authoritarian ethos that governs this uh and then subsequent to
00:24:44.000that so i was watching this ndp thing and i remember looking at that room looks really familiar
00:24:50.000like she has a very distinctive look um like the haircut and the everything about it's like i've
00:24:57.200seen this this person somewhere before and and then on twitter nick said that's the same woman
00:25:04.000that's her like that's the same woman who who gave this insane gender weighing presentation
00:25:10.720and then turned me in turned state's evidence on me and and and i think eventually gotten fired if
00:25:15.840i remember correctly and um and then so as this was crowdsourced online i also learned that she
00:25:24.160was behind half a dozen other things like so she was one of the um proponents of defunding the
00:25:31.920vancouver rape crisis center which is for women because it's a rape crisis center and there was
00:25:37.840this 61 year old man who wanted to be a peer counselor to female rape victims and the vancouver
00:25:44.080rape center rape crisis center said no because that's completely inappropriate and if if i
00:25:50.480remember correctly she was on his side and the whole thing was subject to a human rights complaint
00:25:56.480but in the end the vancouver rape crisis center was defunded by the city of vancouver in large part
00:26:03.440thanks to her agitation which is by the way i should say which is how i became a regular donor
00:26:09.360to the vancouver rape crisis center because they needed more money from private donors because the
00:26:13.140city of vancouver decided they weren't going to give money to a female rape crisis center that
00:26:17.980actually cares to females so um i became a donor and i encourage other people to investigate
00:26:24.760donating to them anyway she was behind that she also took the side of that i don't remember that
00:26:30.720Yeah, we know him, John, because he sent us a cease and desist letter last week because he sent one to everyone saying, if you don't, if you retweet Billboard Chris again, I will haul you in front of the BC Human Rights Board.
00:26:44.740I mean, I think he sent it to like 30 people, including Juno News, including Western Standard and many others.
00:26:49.900It's time to modernize Canada's rules on nicotine.
00:26:53.320Alternatives to cigarettes like heated tobacco vaping products and oral smokeless products