Will the mandates return? (ft. Dr. Kevin Bardosh)
Episode Stats
Words per minute
180.3705
Harmful content
Hate speech
3
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, Dr. Kevin Bardosh and his co-author, Prof. Kevan Bardosh, discuss the harmful effects of Canada's decade-long policy lockdowns, passport restrictions, and passport and lockdowns imposed in response to the 2011 pandemic. They argue that these policies were counterproductive and damaging to public health, and led to societal polarization and worsened trust in government.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
hey everybody welcome back to the show hope you're all enjoying a great summer wherever you are
00:00:21.940
thanks once again for joining me today i'm looking at a very important question that
00:00:27.620
isn't being dealt with in a serious way in the mainstream media space whatever you may think
00:00:33.820
of covid19 restrictions such as mask mandates vaccine mandates and lockdowns in particular
00:00:40.700
the defenders of these public health measures claimed that they were a necessary tool to combat
00:00:47.000
the pandemic but those defenders often neglect whether willfully or not the costly and damaging
00:00:53.380
negative effects these public health measures had on us and those negative effects if they're large
00:01:00.360
enough could even outweigh the benefits the point is we won't know until we look at both sides of the
00:01:06.740
ledger and not pretend that lockdowns had only a good side to them this is to say nothing of the
00:01:12.680
fact that several of these policies themselves had a dubious rationale at best in some cases
00:01:19.060
for example as many of you know on august 2nd i broke a big story for common sense
00:01:25.140
that the federal mandate vaccine mandate for travel had no compelling scientific rationale
00:01:32.240
and whatever scientific rationale there was how is it that it applied to canadians and everybody else
00:01:39.760
except not to unvaccinated ukrainians arriving in canada after the war i understand why canada might
00:01:46.700
want to be compassionate towards those fleeing a war zone but it's hard to believe that the virus
00:01:53.180
understood this difference and then again where was the compassion to the millions of canadians who
00:01:58.380
couldn't travel to meet their loved ones and were essentially prisoners uh as soon as the federal
00:02:04.300
vaccine mandates came into effect let's also remind ourselves that these mandates haven't been trashed
00:02:10.700
uh they've only been suspended and can be brought back in at the drop of a hat today's guest is
00:02:16.460
ideally situated to talk about the harmful effects of covet 19 vaccine policies that both federal and
00:02:22.380
provincial governments are happy to sweep under the rug kevin bardosh is an applied medical
00:02:28.140
anthropologist and implementation scientist focused on using social science and community engagement to
00:02:34.620
improve public health delivery and policy he's affiliate assistant professor at the university of
00:02:41.100
washington he was a lead author in an academic paper in british medical journal global health
00:02:47.340
it's a peer-reviewed scientific journal and the study is titled the unintended consequences of
00:02:53.500
covet 19 vaccine policy why mandates passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
00:03:00.540
the title of the paper pretty much gives us a sense of where kevin and co-authors come down on the issue
00:03:07.180
so without any further delay let's get started all right so um kevin welcome to the show um i
00:03:14.540
was hoping that we could chat about this very important paper that uh you and your co-authors
00:03:19.980
published in the british medical journal global health um you argue in the paper that contrary to
00:03:28.460
the policy boosters who always point to the upsides of vaccine mandates um passports lockdowns
00:03:37.340
etc you point to what you call the quote counterproductive and damaging effects on public health
00:03:43.820
of covet 19 vaccine policies in particular which you say not only infringe on civil liberties but can
00:03:49.580
result in societal polarization and worsen mistrust in government among other things
00:03:55.180
um could you tell me what led you and your co-authors to do this research in the first place did you
00:04:02.380
see the need to have um a corrective uh to the official narrative that focuses almost exclusively
00:04:09.660
on the upsides of covet 19 policies and i would argue that it pays short shrift to its harmful effects
00:04:17.740
absolutely i think there are lots of different motivations and i can't speak for all of my co-authors
00:04:21.900
but um from my side on the one hand it was uh just seeing a lack of debate about this issue and when
00:04:29.500
i say that i mean if you think back to pre-pandemic 2019 if you were to gather a bunch of global health
00:04:35.020
experts together and give them a scenario which was what took place in 2020 and 2021 most of them would
00:04:41.260
probably not advise the mandates and the man and the lockdown approaches that we ended up taking because
00:04:47.020
they were not standard seen as standard acceptable policy response um once we went down that road of
00:04:54.060
locking down with china italy and the us it became very difficult for political leaders to step back
0.90
00:04:59.020
and say no we're not going to do that we're going to do something different um you had policy lock-in
00:05:03.260
around lockdowns um so on the one hand we wanted we just saw a lack of critical debate um people were also
00:05:09.900
they might have had skeptical views but they felt unable to come forward and express those because of
00:05:14.860
reputational damage etc so um we felt like a responsibility to articulate that um in a
00:05:21.180
scholarly way and in a way that um would challenge people and offer a space to critically evaluate
00:05:27.820
these these mandates and sort of policy culture around them um also secondly uh just in my own
00:05:34.380
social network seeing people um kind of freaking out in different ways experiencing the mandates in in
00:05:40.940
in in polar opposite ways so people saying i'm not going to go around unvaccinated people you're not
00:05:45.660
welcome to come to my christmas party even though i'm a christian for example um and then other people
00:05:51.340
ending up in psych wards because they were so negatively impacted by the the sort of uh inspection
00:05:57.740
of the motivation of what was taking place right and i'm reticent to use the word conspiracy theories
00:06:03.180
there um but alternative power theories around why governments would mandate a product like that
00:06:09.100
at that time uh and in that particular way given concerns um that predate the pandemic about the
00:06:15.340
direction of uh of government um and this sort of increase of bureaucratic um sort of yeah culture
00:06:22.940
around uh around health and around um just general service delivery so um yeah i've seen it in my own
00:06:30.540
social network the negative impacts and i think we've also seen it in canada and the irony is this paper
00:06:35.500
was written before the freedom convoy uh started so clearly we were feeling the social pulse of the
00:06:41.740
time in canada but then also elsewhere as you know these these protests were global in scope yeah
00:06:47.260
they were covered in a very specific framing in the media which i disagree with um and i think you do
00:06:52.940
as well so just trying to add nuance you know i think one thing here is in this perpetual cycle of
00:07:00.300
the death what i call the death of nuance so we're hoping to add to that debate um and i think we've
00:07:05.740
we've succeeded in in some degree i think so because you you marshal a lot of uh data and facts and you
00:07:12.140
point to uh you know you cite lots of studies uh to to you know to support uh the the you know your
00:07:20.140
your study um you know i just i'm always intrigued you know how is it that everybody just was you know
00:07:26.140
there was so little dissent is especially from the media you know or from our um and anybody who
00:07:33.740
dissented i think any scientist a doctor epidemiologist who said hey wait a minute this is not making any
00:07:39.820
sense i don't i think we're going in in the wrong direction here when it comes to school closures when
00:07:44.940
it comes to things like vaccine mandates uh and anybody who said that was uh you know shouted out of
00:07:51.580
the room was seen as it was smeared and called a conspiracy theorist uh not a real doctor uh and
00:07:59.260
and and and it was incredibly damaging i think and in in a sense uh created this culture of fear uh
00:08:06.220
that uh a lot of us you know and i've explained this in a recent national post column um you know i
00:08:11.580
consider myself to be fairly rational minded and you know i'm not someone who's prone to hysteria and panic
00:08:16.780
but i have to say that you know at some level some of that fear even got to me and uh and you know
00:08:23.420
i remember searching um for anything at that time you know is there anybody who says who's who's pointing
00:08:29.980
to uh the opposite and saying you know these these intuitively i knew that these policies were very
00:08:36.860
damaging it made no sense to me why you would cordon off park benches um you know it just or where the
00:08:45.420
you know the top doctor in my city of ottawa uh said that no more than 20 people could be on a hiking
00:08:51.660
trail in the middle of winter um so and we were told outdoors is one of the safest places you can be
00:08:58.380
uh and but but uh but outdoors also became an issue you couldn't be outdoors so essentially you know our
00:09:05.820
movements were being restricted and uh and you know and i'm very grateful for you know your contribution
00:09:12.300
you and your co-authors for um for um you know for coming out with this because you know now i
00:09:17.820
hopefully more people are starting to realize the damaging effects of these uh policies and starting
00:09:23.900
to um question because you know we are not quite done there's no guarantee that these policies are not
00:09:29.020
going to return right i mean we've we at least here in canada with the vaccine mandates even though
00:09:34.380
they've been uh you know they've been suspended for now they could be brought back at the drop of a hat
00:09:40.380
and so there's no guarantee and i hope that more you know more people look at the study and look at
00:09:45.020
the harmful effects uh these policies have had on us um and and you know whether it was all worth it
00:09:52.700
than worth it in the end do you think that these policies were worth it in the end so it's really
00:09:57.500
difficult to make general statements obviously right like we're dealing with my own work crosses
00:10:02.860
lots of different countries different social groups etc so it's i'm somewhat reticent to make
00:10:08.540
general claims but i would say on the whole i think that we took a wrong approach here
00:10:12.700
and just to focus on the fear as as an example right yeah fear is incredibly stressful it has all
00:10:19.340
sorts of psychosocial and physiological effects and when you ramp up fear for so long which the media
00:10:25.500
did i mean looking just at the the journalistic stories there was a study looking journalism in the
00:10:31.020
u.s that found like 90 plus percent of media coverage was negative versus european countries where it
00:10:36.940
was like 40 or 50 so just the tone of media has a huge effect on the national psyche um i do think
00:10:43.820
that a lot of the policies that we implemented will be found and are currently seen should be seen as
00:10:49.180
causing more societal harm than benefit school closures are one of them like you said outdoor uh
00:10:54.860
mandates right um in in in ontario from april to june of 2021 you had stay-at-home orders right which
00:11:01.820
were effectively limiting the ability to go outside and gather and that was over a year into the
00:11:06.940
pandemic and i actually just finished a scoping review of the evidence on mental health in canada
00:11:13.900
for the pandemic and it's really quite striking i mean there is no study that's saying oh yeah people
00:11:19.260
are okay all the studies unanimously say um mental health of people suffered drastically anxiety depression
00:11:26.700
psychiatric conditions um and they also increased over time so by the time you get into 2021 they're
00:11:32.780
worse than when they were in may of 2020 right so was it reasonable to be uh locking people down
00:11:40.060
when you were already uh vaccinating the most vulnerable population group that's very puzzling
00:11:46.220
because i mean this is a question that i wanted to ask you uh um and i asked this to everybody uh any
00:11:51.980
expert why is it that we panicked so much in the uh we we panicked so much after after vaccination was
00:11:59.260
widespread uh and the variants were becoming milder and milder what what explains that panic uh uh we
00:12:06.700
were i yeah no that's so that's a fascinating question that i have you know scrawly notes everywhere
00:12:12.780
about different thoughts yeah and i think my conclusion would be on the one hand when you start with a
00:12:18.300
fear-based message it's really hard to backtrack right i mean we we heard very little empowering messages
00:12:24.940
we also had what i call a covetization of the world everything was seen through the prism of
00:12:30.620
covid cases covid deaths fear of covid the new social norms around social distancing and physical
00:12:36.300
distancing or whatever you want to call it and we became hyper obsessed with that and the best
00:12:41.340
sort of analog that i like to draw on um is the 9 11 attacks and i happen to have moved from
00:12:47.740
montreal to boston a few months right before 9 11. um and so i witnessed that as a as a canadian in a
00:12:54.700
foreign country and i was astounded at how the americans that just the the national psyche became
00:13:00.140
completely overwhelmed with this vision of we need we need retaliation and the narrative very narrow in
00:13:06.700
fact um howard zinn the famous uh leftist progressive historian came to my high school um a few weeks
00:13:14.380
after and his his message was questioning the government's response to this is not anti-american
00:13:20.700
right now that was that was the the flavor and if you remember new york times everyone was saying you
00:13:24.940
know they were they were doing the the drum beat to war war and people like chris hedges were completely
00:13:31.580
uh marginalized for their skepticism about the war and it took many years for the for the national
00:13:37.580
conversation to admit hey this is this is not this was a this is a wrong decision we had just more um
00:13:43.340
just war theory that emerged out of the ethics departments similar to the ethical discussion
00:13:48.060
around mandates i would i think there's parallels between that yeah um and then sort of um lastly the
00:13:54.540
the great iron or the tragic irony is that um the afghan pullout debacle was occurring as the pandemic was
00:14:02.060
still um still uh rolling on yeah we saw this sort of very stark reminder of the the power of empire or the
00:14:10.620
being or the weakness of empire being shown in the frivolity of it as we're still arguing about masking
00:14:16.460
five-year-olds in new york city let's say yeah yeah i just think there's a lot of parallels there um
00:14:21.180
absolutely yeah and so the the second concept is this notion of safetism with which the the moral psychologist
00:14:27.180
jonathan hyde has talked a lot about which has been in the last 20 years as we've become a culture of
00:14:32.540
affluence we we we put safety as the sort of highest moral value a virtue in and of itself so everything
00:14:40.140
is about making sure everyone is safe um and i think what we've seen here is that there is a risk
00:14:45.740
to that perpetual obsession with safety um and and a miscalculation of risk also so like for myself
00:14:54.060
um i i was very alarmed at what was going on in china very early on uh i knew about this you know
00:15:00.460
as the first sort of whispers were occurring my kids were masked in january um we were you know
00:15:06.780
disinfecting uh our grocery groceries in january before anybody was doing anything um and then as i
00:15:14.460
learned about the age distribution and thinking okay we're healthy people our risk profile completely
00:15:20.780
dropped off sort of like may 2020 and also anyhow i won't get into all the nuances of our family
00:15:26.620
situation but yeah and you know uh i think that that was an appropriate response for my particular
00:15:32.700
age group and the way that i interact with people so yeah yeah so there was this uh one size fits all
00:15:40.460
approach to everybody right so we knew right from the get-go that um that the most vulnerable had to be
00:15:46.940
protected so people in long-term care homes retirement homes the elderly those who are
00:15:51.660
immunocompromised but why would say you know you know a teenager someone in their 20s or the 30s or
00:15:59.580
even 40s for that matter very healthy um you know why is it that we were also subject to the same measures
00:16:07.260
uh and that is something that i didn't understand as well you know very early on and and as you say you
00:16:13.100
know i i made my own risk assessment you know i possibly had covid very early on back in january
00:16:19.580
2020 um and uh and then i was triple vaccinated and and then i got omicron and then i still you know
00:16:29.500
was worried that i was unmasked in a crowded space and i was thinking to myself well where's the science
00:16:34.460
here the science says that i have all of these antibodies uh and what am i so afraid of and it just
00:16:41.340
made no sense and at that point i think you know everybody comes to this decision and they're
00:16:45.820
you know at their own pace and for me it took it took a while that i had ups and downs but i came
00:16:51.500
to the same conclusion that's it i'm done uh being fearful and i just want to move on with my life and
00:16:57.420
uh whatever happens happens you know and i'm you know i i accept that responsibility but
00:17:03.100
so far so good uh is all i can say but um but go yeah but going back to your paper kevin so you know in
00:17:09.740
in your paper you break down the potential unintended uh harmful consequences of covet 19
00:17:15.500
policies um into four categories uh which you describe as one behavioral psychology uh political
00:17:22.780
and legal effects socioeconomics and integrity of science and public health um would you like to
00:17:30.220
tell me how you narrowed down your analysis to these four areas um and why you believe these are
00:17:35.900
key to understanding the harmful effects of mandates or other public health measures yeah i
00:17:41.580
mean as a as a applied medical anthropologist we use you know uh in thematic analysis we try to
00:17:48.540
make sense of the complexity of social life by grouping things into major themes so that's
00:17:53.180
effectively what we did here just looking at the literature so doing a literature review
00:17:57.740
and then reading basically as much as we could about about this particular topic in different
00:18:01.900
countries and then also i think twitter was also a fabulous resource just to understand people's
00:18:06.780
responses and their opinions about about this particular topic um so and it's pretty standard
00:18:12.220
also if you think about the effects of a policy intervention these are pretty standard areas that
00:18:16.620
you would talk about um so that's that's how we determine the the structure of it um and uh yeah i mean
00:18:25.020
uh yeah yeah so um and and you know and your paper also has these um incredible quotes from major world
00:18:36.380
leaders including our own justin trudeau uh and i and i urge everybody to take a look at this table uh
00:18:42.780
table two of the paper uh these are major world leaders uh who are essentially scapegoating and
00:18:48.540
stigmatizing their own people uh who happen to be unvaccinated uh macron for example in france says
00:18:54.940
he wanted to piss off the small minority of the unvaccinated even more than before and went so
0.99
00:19:00.940
far as to claim that someone irresponsible in his opinion is not even a citizen and of course we know
00:19:06.860
what uh our prime minister justin trudeau uh when he when he infamously said uh he tarred all
00:19:13.660
of the unvaccinated as a group of misogynists and racists uh asking do we uh tolerate these people
00:19:20.700
um i mean this this this feels like it's right out of the 1930s um and uh so thank you for
00:19:27.260
assembling these incredibly disturbing quotes all in one place uh but why do you think that these
00:19:32.780
world leaders made these outrageous claims uh to marginalize and stigmatize their own uh citizens
00:19:39.260
uh do you think they genuinely believe this or was this a political tactic uh to perhaps increase
00:19:45.180
their power and authority or you know or in or in this case in canada in canada's case serve as a
00:19:52.540
wedge issue um as i recently argued in the case of uh trudeau's uh uh federal uh vaccine mandate for
00:20:00.140
travel which was conveniently announced um two days before uh last fall's election yeah it was a great
00:20:07.500
questions so on the one hand it depends on what the information that they had available at the time was
00:20:12.780
right i mean if you see if you if you thought that the vaccine would actually end the pandemic which
00:20:17.260
is what we were told right if you go back to mid 2021 that was the rhetoric this is 97 effective
00:20:22.540
and we are going to end the pandemic if everyone gets vaccinated um it's clearly was not true it was
00:20:28.700
it was it was obvious at the time if you were somebody who specialized in vaccinations and global
00:20:34.220
health you could understand that this was going to be and probably a non-durable vaccine there was data
00:20:39.020
out of israel and the uk in you know early to mid 2021 showing that the vaccines were not durable and
00:20:45.420
sense that they would stop transmission completely um etc so it depends on what their scientific advice
00:20:51.980
was um i would also say that there's just this sort of very narrow um uh view of vaccination as a totem
00:21:00.060
as something that's morally good and can't be questioned it's sort of a standard uh notion that vaccines are
00:21:07.660
always safe no matter what and everyone should get vaccinated what's your problem why aren't you
00:21:11.180
vaccinated so it's seen as it's almost like intelligence test um and i would argue that that's
00:21:16.220
that's also a fallacious concept um it erodes people's individual uh decision making agency um
00:21:24.940
so i mean one astounding thing about all this is the sort of complete denial of prior infection and
00:21:30.380
in fact if you go back and you there were papers pre-vaccine talking about the ethics of immunity
00:21:35.420
passport so if somebody had covid should they be given freedoms that the rest of us don't have
00:21:40.380
because they have this prior infection sort of immunity and that was seen as as a bad idea because
00:21:46.460
it would promote people to go and get infected so i think that that was also part of this logic was
00:21:51.100
well if we allow prior infection to be given equal status people who don't want to get vaccinated are
00:21:56.060
all going to go get infected at these covid parties um so you can see again this sort of um
00:22:01.020
uh sort of parental or or very kind of condescending perspective of the of our of our government on
00:22:08.460
citizens like you can't make decisions for yourself so we're gonna tell you yeah very paternalistic yeah
0.92
00:22:16.380
yeah um yeah um and and in exactly but in a sense what has ended up happening now
00:22:23.260
with the with with the current approach is that with vaccination uh essentially all of these countries
00:22:28.380
are like yeah i mean i think at this point you might as well get infected um and uh yeah and and
00:22:38.620
exactly and why do you think that they uh we they they they downplayed um something as old as time
00:22:45.900
itself which is natural immunity why is it that they um um you know double down on vaccination in such a
00:22:53.020
big way and just completely ignored the fact that you could recover from covet 19 and you
00:22:58.220
had these antibodies and now you have studies coming out saying that these antibodies are
00:23:02.620
in some in in some cases just as good as getting vaccinated um and and if you're vaccinated and
00:23:09.500
recovered that's even better perhaps i i don't know but the point is that there's a slow recognition
00:23:15.180
happening right now um that natural immunity does play a role but why did we just initially just ignore
00:23:21.100
it what do you think happened there so i think there's the scientific data about the vaccine and
00:23:25.660
you know we need to be give people some of the benefit of the doubt or be a little bit
00:23:30.060
um not compassionate but understanding in the sense that this was a very stressful emergency a
00:23:34.940
lot of people died from covid a lot of people suffered because of the consequences and the
00:23:38.860
restrictions and i do think i i don't want to just create this increased polarization of the conversation
00:23:46.060
um but there's also a need to take stock of what happened so that it doesn't happen again if you go and
00:23:50.940
read bill gates his recent book on pandemics he basically lays out this plan that if there's
00:23:54.780
another respiratory pandemic or whatever we need to lock down for six months while the pharmaceutical
00:23:59.420
companies and the government creates a vaccine and up again so this idea uh this is going to be now in
00:24:06.060
the rule book going forward and that's that really needs to be questioned in my opinion um so what you know
00:24:12.700
what data were they looking at um second of all would be um just the the the the um i just lost my
00:24:21.420
train of thought for the second oh right this increase of bureaucratization so a vaccine is something
00:24:25.820
that you can standardize in the sense of okay how many people are vaccinated 60 70 blah blah blah you can
00:24:32.140
you can easily sort of monitor it you can easily track it so i think that that's one of the things
00:24:38.460
whereas prior infection it's almost like a natural thing um it's unruly uh how do we know if somebody
00:24:44.860
was really infected at what time what antibody level do they have there was all this conversation
00:24:49.740
about about this so i would say that on one hand it reflects this bureaucratic culture in government
00:24:55.420
um on this on the third this third kind of thing and you know to be controversial here but this is
00:25:00.380
an obvious thing the pharmaceutical industry made a huge amount of money 100 billion dollars i mean
00:25:08.380
this is the same pharmaceutical industry that pre-pandemic a lot of people who were very forceful
00:25:14.460
about the mandates would be skeptical saying exactly crisis look at mental health uh conditions where we
00:25:21.260
just drug everyone up with prosem oh the pharmaceutical industry you know is is is manipulating the trial data
00:25:28.380
and yet when some when a pandemic happens no no you can't question the pharmaceutical industry
00:25:33.260
and yet the revolving door between government and pharmaceutical industry is actually increasing
00:25:37.580
with time it's not decreasing uh and you know for example the freedom of information act that this
00:25:43.420
ngo in the u.s um you know initiated pfizer and the fda tried to stop it um and and tried to uh
00:25:51.660
basically argue that it would take them 75 years to release all of the internal communications between
00:25:56.460
pfizer and pfizer and the fda so take off your preconceptions about the pandemic and just put
00:26:01.260
on that hat for a second i think that that needs to be looked at a lot more carefully um you know this
00:26:07.420
whole notion of of 97 effective at transmission it seems like we were also very very hopeful people
00:26:13.980
were hoping that this would stop you know it would be this sort of okay now we can go back to normal
00:26:18.620
everyone's vaccinated so there was this massive sort of social hope um that unfortunately didn't quite
00:26:25.020
pan out in the way that that it did um yeah yeah yeah so you know so that that was you know that
00:26:32.060
leads to my next question perfectly which is you know one of the points you make in the paper uh which
00:26:37.260
i thought was very striking and salient was you know the lack of transparency about the vaccines
00:26:43.340
themselves uh for example pharmaceutical companies and governments you know don't release haven't released
00:26:49.660
all of the relevant data um it fosters suspicions and fuels conspiracy theories uh which could be
00:26:56.540
you know easily diffused if the data were simply made public i think uh and you know forgive me for
00:27:02.220
being cynical here but i feel like one obvious reason for not releasing such data is that it doesn't
00:27:07.180
support the idea that the vaccines were the greatest thing since sliced bread and um and as we've seen
00:27:13.820
governments around the world um you know including canada they keep watering down the claims and this
00:27:19.820
is a point that you make in the paper as well originally we were told getting double jab would
00:27:24.780
be the route to return to normalcy then we were told getting a booster would reduce the seriousness of
00:27:29.660
symptoms and um and even though vaccination was supposed to prevent you from getting infected
00:27:35.100
now we're told it's to help our collapsing healthcare system which was already collapsing even before
00:27:39.500
the pandemic um and uh in elderly homes exactly exactly these are not new issues uh but what do you
00:27:48.940
what do you make of this constantly shifting goalposts and what you know and and and what and how does it
00:27:54.780
affect the future uh of public health policy especially in canada will you know people trust the government
00:28:02.220
uh going forward if they say you must do xyz in the interest of public health and your own public safety
00:28:08.460
uh when the promises of these mandates of these covet 19 restrictions have run hollow uh on so many
00:28:15.980
occasions yeah so so two things one is in the paper we make the argument that when you mandate a vaccine
00:28:22.540
you should be held to a higher standard of transparency uh than if you don't mandate it so if you know the
00:28:29.580
the the the vaccine efficacy is not as effective over time if you didn't mandate it you're going to
00:28:34.860
maintain population trust more than if you mandate a vaccine and it doesn't turn out quite in the
00:28:39.260
way that you were saying it which is what what kind of is taking place or has taken place here
00:28:43.580
number two is it really depends on whether the population the citizens of the country really care
00:28:48.860
right like how many canadians still think that lockdowns were a wonderful intervention that was
00:28:54.300
necessary how many of them think that vaccine mandates were absolutely necessary and and think that you
00:28:59.740
know people who were protesting against them were sort of far right trump conspirators that are related
00:29:05.980
to qnon i the data you know is there's not a lot of data out there yes i think that it's it's certainly
00:29:12.220
shifted over time there's a lot less people that are supportive of that as they become infected
00:29:16.060
themselves and sort of experience different things in their own social networks um so but i i think that
00:29:23.260
we are going to see a mass we already have seen a massive backlash against trust in public health
00:29:28.780
and in government because of the way that this has been handled um and for example uh um there's no to
00:29:36.060
my knowledge there is no cost benefit of analysis of boosters for people under 40 from the u.s with
00:29:42.300
omicron or even delta going forward so the the u.s cdc and fda and whatnot are advocating for you know 20
00:29:50.540
10 year olds 20 year olds 30 year olds 39 year olds to get boosted but they don't actually have like
00:29:56.140
an age-based harm benefit uh analysis uh for that age group and so um another paper that we have
00:30:04.140
hopefully coming out soon um we offer the first risk benefit analysis in that group okay i won't get
00:30:09.900
into the the results but then we make we pivot and we make five ethical arguments against booster
00:30:14.700
mandates um and um you know some of those uh include like if you don't have a clear benefit
00:30:21.820
you shouldn't mandate a vaccine right so like there's a trustworthiness issue there you're
00:30:25.980
damaging trust in regulators and in public health authorities if it's not clear um second of all if
00:30:31.900
you don't have a vaccine injury compensation program that is functional and that's the case in the u.s
00:30:37.180
and i would say even canada these people you know rare rare cases sure i'll use the word rare
00:30:43.340
um you know people have been injured from the vaccine we acknowledge that in in public health
00:30:47.660
that all vaccines have some side effects and those people have not been compensated and they've
00:30:51.580
actually had horrible experiences many of them through the bureaucratic byzantine maze of seeking
00:30:56.700
compensation so if you don't have a functioning compensation thing you're asking people to
00:31:00.540
part to mandating people to participate in something and you're not providing compensation
00:31:04.060
that's unethical um and then we look at also for for under 40 you know a lot of schools and
00:31:09.980
universities are mandating boosters so individuals who have prior infection maybe they're concerned
00:31:14.620
about myocarditis whatever they have you know humans are complicated we have all sorts of reasons
00:31:19.020
why we do something we don't do it um you're effectively taking away their ability to go to school
00:31:24.700
to keep a job etc and um you know this late in the game it doesn't really make sense when so many
00:31:30.700
people have already been infected um it's yeah it's it's quite surprising to me that booster mandates
00:31:37.660
are still on the table at this point yeah but do you see a shift happening at all anywhere um um
00:31:43.980
whether it's in the us or canada a shift uh from our public health officials um a recognition that
00:31:51.020
you know public trust has been lost to some extent to a large extent and that hey you know maybe we need
00:31:57.500
to step back a little bit and rethink this uh and not have this top-down uh technocratic approach to
00:32:04.620
public health and uh do you do you see that happening at all i mean absolutely it's happening
00:32:11.500
it's been happening for for over a year now i think when people felt like they could voice dissent
00:32:16.620
and not be classified as deviants that were you know killing grandma or whatnot um i don't know where
00:32:23.900
we go from here it's hard for me to get a sense of the pulse of my colleagues that are outside of the
00:32:30.140
skeptical frame that i that i am very much in um and i am i am concerned um and i think as a as a
00:32:39.580
social scientist i'm interested to stay close to what what research data is showing and um you know
00:32:45.500
i am open-minded i'm not dogmatic or i'm not an ideologue here um but there's going to need to be a
00:32:52.140
pivot and to go back to the 9 11 example right how long did that take for the for the foreign policy
00:32:57.740
establishment in the united states to shift their narrative around foreign interventions in
00:33:03.580
afghanistan iraq north africa et cetera i mean it took decades and even now we're still dealing with
00:33:09.820
uh the the debt from those decisions and the loss of the loss of government trust i mean
00:33:16.380
you know uh 9 11 and and the wars in the middle east were predicated on phony information phony
00:33:22.780
intelligence in many you know and and they had devastating consequences for people's lives
00:33:28.300
yeah um so again i think that there this is going to be a process and i think i see it as as part of
00:33:34.220
my role is to just push people and say hey look this was was this really a good decision was this really
00:33:40.380
the way that we want to do things and look at the consequences yeah do you do you think that uh
00:33:45.740
do you do you envision um at some point some of these measures coming back um maybe sometime in
00:33:52.060
the fall do you think that's going to happen or we are or do you think that we're basically done with
00:33:56.860
lockdowns and mandates i don't i don't know i mean covet is you know it's not a nice virus it can be
00:34:04.220
quite um devastating for people and it's we're getting it we're going to be getting it you know going
00:34:10.620
forward into the future and so i am i i i'm not an expert in the long coveted literature i'm i mean
00:34:16.780
i am concerned about it um um and it's yeah it's going to be a difficult balance um of what we do
00:34:24.140
going forward and i don't have any yeah i haven't spent uh the time to sort of put my head together
00:34:29.340
and really think about what policies should be going we should implement going forward but it does
00:34:34.540
seem like most um school districts are um you know they're advocating against mass mandates
00:34:40.860
against closures even in massachusetts recently which was you know had very um maximalist approaches
00:34:46.620
for a while the cdc's new guidelines are certainly um a step in the right direction um but then we're
00:34:53.580
going to face a situation where if we just have nothing we have no control right then we need to sort
00:34:59.020
of flip the narrative and say okay how can we support reductions of covid mortality and morbidity
00:35:05.100
yeah right we don't want to just allow people to sort of suffer and and die from from a virus if we
00:35:11.420
can prevent it um so i think we're going to have to have a rethink and obviously ventilation plays a
00:35:17.180
good role there um paid sick leave a great idea um early treatment with you know anti-inflammatories
00:35:26.620
etc um and and hope right that's one of the most perplexing things about this whole pandemic is
00:35:32.460
we were told shut yourself in your house um don't go and gather with people and if you get sick
00:35:37.900
stay home don't do anything until you can't breathe and then go to the emergency room i mean
00:35:43.420
what kind of health policy is that i mean even so i i say i say that sometimes i think like with the
00:35:48.700
whole ivermectin debate even if ivermectin is completely not effective there's still a placebo effect
00:35:55.580
involved and right of doctors saying no we've got something that can help you so i mean yeah
00:36:03.740
yeah no it's been i think i will look back on this time i mean i think we're already kind of doing that
00:36:09.580
you know just how ridiculous some of these discussions were uh and how many of us went along
00:36:15.100
with it um you know and and but at least i think some of us are waking up and that's a good sign
00:36:21.820
uh but uh but hey uh kevin uh you know that brings us uh to the end of this uh discussion but uh you
00:36:28.140
know it was great having you on the show um you know of course we're just scratching the surface here
00:36:33.020
um so i hope you'll be back on the show again soon but hopefully not to discuss the next set of
00:36:38.540
mandates that come come come down from the government so i really appreciate you taking
00:36:44.220
the time to chat with me and also to you to you and your colleagues for uh i think uh you know
00:36:49.740
writing you know coming up with the study which is a very important uh um corrective to the official
00:36:55.580
narrative that uh lockdowns were uh amazing for all of us and they did all of these great things so
00:37:01.420
thanks for being on the show kevin my pleasure thanks for having me okay thank you