Juno News - July 02, 2023


YWCA campaign “demonizes men with false numbers” (ft. Janice Fiamengo)


Episode Stats


Length

19 minutes

Words per minute

158.87256

Word count

3,164

Sentence count

4

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the Andrew Lawton Show, host Andrew Lawton talks about the shocking statistics on concussions in professional hockey players and domestic violence in the NHL, and why the social science simply doesn t support these claims.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 you're tuned in to the andrew lawton show
00:00:05.920 let's move on to this other issue which admittedly was one that completely stayed off my radar until
00:00:14.160 i read about it from janice fiamengo's great newsletter the fiamengo file and part of the
00:00:20.240 reason it completely escaped me is because it involves someone who used to play for the nhl
00:00:24.860 which i'm told is a cricket league might know maybe it's football hockey hockey nhl hockey yeah
00:00:30.340 i get so many angry emails when i do that gag i know nhl is hockey that's about all i know
00:00:36.600 but it was a rather moving psa from a former nhl figure let's roll this for you now
00:00:42.720 i don't remember the hit i remember everything leading up to it
00:00:52.220 but nothing after he came from behind me i didn't see it coming i was hit in the side of the head
00:00:59.620 i remember being confused my ears were ringing it's hard to talk about i still experience pain
00:01:08.060 mood swings the headaches are debilitating
00:01:11.520 but this isn't my story
00:01:14.800 it's mine
00:01:17.720 that was former vancouver canucks captain trevor linden in a psa for the ywca uh talking about
00:01:41.360 the disparity between concussions in hockey and concussions in women who have suffered from
00:01:47.860 domestic violence now i i should say first and foremost it's a very compelling powerful ad it's
00:01:54.140 very well produced it's a well uh it's a well presented message it's a shocking message when
00:02:00.020 they say 92 percent of women girls and gender diverse people who experience traumatic brain injury
00:02:05.980 uh do so as a result of violence by an intimate partner and they also talk about the staggering
00:02:13.020 statistics of what percentage of women will encounter a brain injury from this and i i'll talk about those
00:02:19.820 numbers in a moment but i just first want to say it's often very odd when people try to link two
00:02:26.580 disparate issues and two distinct issues together one kind of random one that just happened to come up
00:02:32.640 yesterday is this uh tweet from neurodiversity ireland so neurodiversity is typically the world
00:02:39.080 of autism and they say that there's no neurodiversity without lgbtq plus and we can't be neuroaffirming
00:02:45.900 without being lgbtq plus affirming and we can't respect people with autism unless we respect people
00:02:51.380 with lgbtq plus identity and you're looking at this and you're like i don't know why these two things
00:02:57.200 matter and and this is where you you get into territory where you're making comparisons that
00:03:02.520 are leading people to a particular conclusion that might not be the right one but in this particular
00:03:07.420 case we have numbers that are contributing to that janice fiamengo is a retired professor from
00:03:12.960 the university of ottawa and also writes the fiamengo file on substack and joins me now janice good
00:03:18.960 to talk to you thanks for coming on today well thank you very much for having me on your show andrew
00:03:24.200 i i'm really pleased to be able to talk about this concussion campaign hoax the key paragraph here
00:03:32.760 just to to put into context that staggering number there is that four in ten women and girls in canada
00:03:39.620 will face violent from a current or former partner according to statistics canada and 92 percent of
00:03:46.060 those will suffer a traumatic brain injury due to blows to their head or strangulation and you say in
00:03:52.040 your newsletter here uh that is effectively saying that more than 30 percent of canadian women more 0.99
00:03:57.580 than and girls more than three and ten will get a brain injury from battering so the numbers are pretty
00:04:03.720 clear there what's what do they get wrong well everything is wrong in it it's also mentioned that for
00:04:10.300 every one professional hockey player who experiences a concussion 7 000 girls and women in canada will
00:04:19.700 experience traumatic brain injury or a concussion so i look that up it says that on average about 80
00:04:26.860 professional hockey players suffer concussion a year so 80 times 7 000 that if my math is correct would be
00:04:36.560 about 560 000 canadian girls and women suffering concussion from intimate partner violence every year
00:04:45.140 that is a staggering number now how is that number arrived at well first of all there's the reference
00:04:52.440 to the stats can survey which found that more than four in 10 canadian women reported suffering from
00:05:01.600 intimate partner violence in their lifetimes it also happened to mention that about one third of
00:05:07.920 canadian boys and men reported suffering from intimate partner violence as well but of course that's not
00:05:13.620 mentioned then it gets to another study that makes this claim about 92 percent however when you look
00:05:22.200 into both of these studies you realize that the social science behind the claims is simply not
00:05:30.020 it's it doesn't support those particular claims and i really looked into this very carefully for one
00:05:38.280 the claim about 44 percent of girls and women suffering intimate partner violence it is a large survey
00:05:47.180 conducted by stats can over 43 000 people but they measure violence so extremely elastically that it
00:05:57.540 clearly has nothing to do with concussions but they count violence to include psychological violence
00:06:03.080 violence that means being called a bad name they count a wide range of so-called physical violence
00:06:09.520 including someone punching a wall having an object thrown at you that may or may not have hit you
00:06:16.200 that you know might have caused damage if it had they count um being forced or someone trying to force you
00:06:24.000 to perform a sex act that you didn't want to perform uh shoving all sorts of things so and and while i would
00:06:32.140 agree that some of these things are certainly abusive and some of them are violence i don't think the
00:06:38.660 psychological violence is quite at the same level being called a bad name um but but certainly it is
00:06:44.680 hard to see how those types of violence could possibly lead to traumatic brain injury so there's a big
00:06:52.200 problem with the total number there when we go to the 92 percent it gets even stranger but just to jump in on
00:07:01.260 on those figures first because i i i want to just preempt the obvious criticism here that you and i
00:07:07.180 are are downplaying this when i i certainly am not and i i know you're not and i believe that abuse is
00:07:11.980 wrong but abuse and violence have never in my understanding been synonyms i mean i'll defer to you
00:07:17.180 as the english professor those words have very different meanings so they're including things that are
00:07:22.780 non that are abusive and non-physical yes as violence yes and that's a huge problem for
00:07:30.340 understanding what it means when people start talking about the numbers of women and girls who
00:07:36.440 suffer from supposed violence and violence that's not directed at the woman or girl but at a wall or
00:07:42.920 throwing a plate or something which again could be very threatening it could be very traumatizing
00:07:47.000 could be a stepping stone to violence but it is not directed at a person right and it has absolutely
00:07:53.260 nothing to do with traumatic brain injury clearly and uh you know they it's impossible to tell from the
00:07:59.800 survey how severe the violence was that was reported so they lump in everything if you remember that 20
00:08:06.680 years ago you had a jealous partner that will be counted as you're having experienced violence along with
00:08:14.440 everything else there isn't even a category in the stats can survey in the report that was based on it
00:08:21.000 for the types of violence that lead to traumatic brain injury which are choking until you pass out
00:08:28.920 or violence to your head they don't even have a category for blows to the head so they're talking
00:08:35.800 about a whole range of issues they they lump together for example being shoved pushed or thrown down
00:08:44.440 well even right there it's impossible to know how severe to be shoved yes that might be quite severe
00:08:50.280 or might not be very severe at all and uh and and there is no way of telling from the survey whether
00:08:56.840 that violence led to the person having to go to the hospital you know whether it led to an actual injury
00:09:03.160 or not it is simply a way of measuring self-reports we don't really know what those numbers mean at all
00:09:11.000 and the range of types of acts or verbal acts that are measured there is simply far too elastic to draw
00:09:18.760 any clear conclusions about numbers so with that how do they get to that 92 yeah so 92 is even stranger
00:09:27.800 and i find more shocking it refers to a study which then refers to another study it's so it isn't even the
00:09:36.440 study that's referred to that study is an american study of black women who experienced severe violence
00:09:45.000 both in childhood and in their adult life specifically being choked or being knocked unconscious out of
00:09:53.880 those it was only 95 women that's a fairly small survey out of those women about 33 experienced uh assumed
00:10:04.600 not even clarified but assumed traumatic brain injury now within that study it referred in a background
00:10:12.360 section of the report to another study that found up to 92 percent listen to this of women who experienced
00:10:22.760 traumatic brain injury 92 of those women had received the traumatic brain injury as a result of intimate
00:10:33.160 intimate partner violence so then they flipped the numbers around and said that of women who experience
00:10:40.040 intimate partner violence up to 92 percent will have traumatic brain injury i think that's called a faulty
00:10:47.720 syllogism it's i think i learned that in my first week of research methods in university which was like a
00:10:55.480 mandatory course that everyone had to do of like one of the things that you are never supposed to do when analyzing data
00:11:01.160 data yeah is reverse your your cause and your effect yes it's i i find that shocking it it either indicates
00:11:08.360 i mean i don't know what what to conclude about that except that either the researchers who come up with
00:11:15.240 these claims are not able to read the studies that they're basing their claims on or it means that they are
00:11:23.720 deliberately misinforming us misrepresenting the studies that they're relying on but either way it is
00:11:30.520 a shocking misrepresentation of the reality of intimate partner violence your your point on this is
00:11:40.040 something i i'm curious about because obviously i think facts matter and i think regardless this is not
00:11:45.800 uh in my view a moral judgment on on the substance of this it's it's saying that these are the numbers and
00:11:51.960 the numbers don't lie unless we interpret them the way they do and then we can twist them but but
00:11:58.120 ultimately this is still a real issue and and we know that intimate partner violence exists and we
00:12:02.360 know that it can have very serious mental and physical consequences so why why is this something
00:12:07.960 that's so important to you well for one thing although we know that intimate partner violence exists
00:12:14.760 i don't think we really have any clear understanding of how prevalent it is and how serious it is and
00:12:22.680 i don't think we have any understanding from these kinds of studies which inflame the situation uh
00:12:29.960 notice of course again uh male victims of violence are never mentioned here so no and there have been
00:12:37.400 some statistics canada surveys that have found males are 50 of victims of intimate partner violence this
00:12:43.480 particular one found that males report violence at a rate of 36 in their lifetimes boys and men will
00:12:52.520 experience some form of intimate partner violence compared to that 44 so that is not a massive
00:12:59.720 discrepancy there and we're talking about mostly boys and men who are victimized by girls and women
00:13:06.760 so um when we're talking about violence i think it's very important to understand that violence is a human
00:13:13.480 problem it is not a problem in which males are solely perpetrators and girls and women are solely
00:13:20.920 victims it tends to be caused not as the feminists will tell us because men are exerting their power 1.00
00:13:27.480 over women and girls and you know through violence which is what this campaign specifically says
00:13:33.480 but no actually most people who are not feminist ideologues who study this problem will tell us that
00:13:40.360 violence occurs because of a variety of circumstances they're the same for both males and females and
00:13:47.320 they have to do with substance abuse they have to have to do with mental illness and they have to do with
00:13:53.480 childhood abuse people who are abused as children tend to become abusers so that is a much more human way
00:14:02.760 of understanding the problem i would say a much more useful way and what a campaign like this does with
00:14:08.520 these really staggering numbers is it demonizes boys and men and it terrorizes girls and women and it
00:14:19.480 misinforms girls and women about the realities of the world that we live in and i think it it it makes it 1.00
00:14:27.480 seem justified to treat boys and men as a category of human being who are deserving of contempt disgust and harsh
00:14:38.120 punishment and i think it also means that when boys and men are accused of violence or sexual violence
00:14:45.240 that we tend to think yeah they're probably guilty because i heard that horrific statistic about 560
00:14:52.040 000 girls and women a year being the victim of intimate partner violence so this is probably a
00:14:57.720 case where this guy did what he's being accused of doing and i think that's just terrible it really
00:15:04.280 miss miss miseducates all of us about the realities of men and women's lives i i mentioned before i i
00:15:12.200 brought you in that rather absurd tweet trying to link you know autism awareness with pride and i i think
00:15:18.280 that we're seeing to maybe not as dramatic a way of doing that but but something very similar here of
00:15:23.960 taking this issue that people know that there's been a lot of advocacy on and research in which is
00:15:28.280 concussions and brain injuries traumatic brain injuries and trying to like push it into this
00:15:32.520 other narrative and and in a way that maybe it just doesn't quite fit at all and it's not to say there
00:15:38.200 can't be traumatic brain injury from this but it's like if there is that's not the core issue the core
00:15:43.480 issue is the intimate partner violence yes and i i find that often when you read these studies there
00:15:49.640 was a study a few years ago that's been well some years ago now but it's been repeatedly cited
00:15:56.040 about the relationship between violence against women and natural disasters there was a huge
00:16:04.200 kerfuffle years ago about the australian wildfires and claims made that men who came home from fighting
00:16:10.120 those fires were taking out their stress on the women and girls in their lives and the study that
00:16:16.200 was cited to prove this was a study about hurricane katrina that claimed that violence against women had 1.00
00:16:22.200 increased had doubled following hurricane katrina and when i looked into that study it was unbelievable
00:16:29.800 how how weak the research was on which that claim was based it was a tiny study it showed that yes
00:16:37.080 violence had allegedly doubled um but it had gone from a tiny tiny number in this small study to double
00:16:43.000 that number which is essentially meaningless when the numbers are so low and it found that violence against
00:16:47.640 boys and men that what they had reported anyway uh had been higher both before and after hurricane
00:16:54.760 katrina so boys and men were reporting higher levels of psychological violence and higher levels of
00:16:59.800 physical violence both before and after and that was never mentioned in any of the discussions about the
00:17:04.520 meaning of the connection between disaster and and violence against women so so so often there are attempts
00:17:11.800 to uh as they say raise awareness and um call for greater resources to be put into protecting girls and
00:17:19.720 women and it's based on extremely shaky statistics and it seems designed really just to support a particular
00:17:28.520 world view in this case in which men are always guilty and women are always innocent victims and it's a shame
00:17:36.200 yeah and i'm glad you mentioned the percentage issue because that's always been that this point that
00:17:40.600 i've tried to take issue with because i think it's one of the most insidious ways in which something
00:17:45.400 is overblown in terms of its effect i i know with hate crimes we see it all the time where uh there'll
00:17:51.000 be a report that says oh you know hate crimes against this group have increased by 60 percent and you
00:17:55.960 look at the numbers and they've gone up by 14 you know 14 individual cases and that's a an increase in in
00:18:02.360 60 percent and i remember i wrote a column about this years ago when i was with global news and the editor
00:18:07.800 actually would not publish uh large parts of it because they say well no percentages don't lie and
00:18:12.920 i said well actually they do uh you know if they don't lie in the sense that yes 60 of you know 100
00:18:18.760 is 60 but they they do lie when you're trying to make a point that something has had this dramatic
00:18:24.360 increase you know there's a difference between something going up from a thousand to 1600 say and
00:18:29.400 something going up from 10 to 16. indeed yes and that is the thing and you know and it's so
00:18:35.560 frustrating when you see that people are people with an agenda are quite willing to obfuscate by
00:18:43.160 using the percentage rather than giving us the actual numbers and so many of us don't have time
00:18:49.160 you know to look this took me a couple hours you know to read through that huge stats can report and
00:18:55.560 to actually figure out what they meant by violence and then to look through the various studies that were
00:19:01.720 cited to prove this 92 percent number most people don't have time to do that kind of research so
00:19:07.400 that's why it's so important that the people who are doing the reporting are scrupulous about explaining
00:19:15.080 to us what those numbers actually mean and when you mix in advocacy um you know political agendas
00:19:23.320 with reporting you get this kind of um you know phantasmatic uh scaremongering and it's
00:19:32.200 yeah it's really concerning janice fiamango you can read her takedown of this psa and lots of other
00:19:39.480 great work over at the fiamango file on substack janice thank you so much for coming on today great
00:19:44.520 to talk to you as always great to talk to you andrew thanks for listening to the andrew lawton show
00:19:49.240 support the program by donating to true north at www.tnc.news