Feminist Tries To Corner Andrew Tate With This Claim
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
192.41478
Summary
In this episode of the podcast, we are joined by comedian, actor, writer and podcaster, to discuss her controversial views on the Tate Tate scandal and how she feels about the way the media and legacy media are treating her.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
you protect your partner or not. It's about what you have said that has caused such concern in the
00:00:04.360
UK. And I want to put it to you that you don't really care about the harm it caused. That's not
00:00:09.540
true. Because making controversial statements like this online has made you a lot of money.
00:00:15.260
Okay. So first thing, I genuinely am a force for good in the world. You may not understand that yet,
00:00:20.100
but you will eventually. And I genuinely believe I'm acting under the instruction of God to do
00:00:25.240
good things. And I want to make the world a better place. I genuinely believe my legacy is a good
00:00:29.520
legacy. And I believe that eventually when the legacy media catches up, they're going to
00:00:32.800
understand I'm a good positive influence. I'm not interested in damaging the world for money.
00:00:36.720
Okay. This is, I will say as a girl, some of this stuff is hard to hear. And I will even admit when
00:00:44.100
I first saw Tate, when I first saw a lot of the red pill guys, as a girl, I wasn't a fan,
00:00:50.260
but you listen, you listen some more and you realize everything they're saying is pure facts.
00:00:57.760
It's pure facts. Nothing they're saying is untrue. It's just a lot of stuff the world has never heard
00:01:02.040
before because we live in such a gynocentric social order that panders to women. So a lot
00:01:07.600
of this stuff is like crazy to us. We've never heard of it, but in the long run, it is better
00:01:12.500
for us to know the way that men think rather than live in delusion. Yes.
00:01:20.100
If I was interested in damaging the world for money, I could have sold drugs or I could make
00:01:23.120
rap music and encourage everyone to stab each other like all the drill artists do.
00:01:26.120
Or you could make controversial statements online that attract a lot of followers who you then direct
00:01:30.500
your website. I could make, I could make jokes. Sure. I mean, I could make, I could make jokes online.
00:01:36.580
Who doesn't? I mean, I could make a joke online. He says, if Tate is a concern, then show, so should
00:01:42.300
destiny. And that's the thing. I actually don't like destiny. I actually don't have a big issue with
00:01:50.960
destiny, but I think he's really biased when it comes to the Tate stuff. I think he just has
00:01:55.560
his narrative. He's trying to spin. He knows he gets clout for like talking about Tate and spinning
00:02:00.400
this narrative. I don't think he actually believes that Tate is a human trafficker. I don't think he
00:02:06.060
actually believes that he's dangerous. And I think a lot of the stuff like that destiny goes at Tate
00:02:10.620
for, it's like really hypocritical because we all know that destiny streamed for years and we could
00:02:18.800
take clips and spin it a certain way. This show, this shows you that the BBC is without
00:02:25.400
edit that they just crap. Yeah. And that, that's my thing is a lot of these reaction channels,
00:02:35.720
the drama channels, the TMZ, they're, they're looking to spin a narrative and they don't go
00:02:40.980
into anything in good faith. Like they, they, they're not looking for facts and they'll die on
00:02:48.300
their hill. They'll die on it. And I'll even say at one point, I wasn't even the biggest fan of some of
00:02:54.880
these guys, but true is true. You know, the controversial things you've said a joke.
00:03:02.860
No, I'm saying that these organizations and the BBC who are going to sit here and pretend that I am
00:03:06.400
to face damaging the youth is absolutely garbage. It's completely disingenuous. And the reason,
00:03:11.380
and the reason, I'm sorry, we have agreed to do an interview where you were going to ask questions
00:03:15.860
that are going to give us the opportunity to clarify some things. These are very loaded questions.
00:03:19.740
I'm sorry. And so far, I'm sorry, I have ratios and I'm talking right now. So these are very loaded
00:03:25.940
questions. And this is not what we discussed. And this is not conversation that we were very
00:03:30.120
good. You're sitting there, you're sitting there and just accusing, we're not going to face new
00:03:35.180
allegations. This has all been discussed. Answers have been provided. So if we could please move on
00:03:39.640
from this side of the interview. Yo, this is what happened to me at trigonometry. This is what
00:03:47.200
happened to me at trigonometry. Okay. I haven't even spoken about this.
00:03:55.240
I'm not looking to do that as an interviewer. I don't, I don't want to get any gotchas. I don't
00:03:59.400
want to like corner somebody. Even, even when Brittany Renner came in and you know, she's done a lot of
00:04:05.220
crazy stuff. Like I still go into interviews in good faith. And if the person ends up being lying
00:04:12.320
or whatever in the interview, like people will correct it later. It's fine. But my issue is that
00:04:19.500
again, they're going in with a narrative. They're not going into things in good faith with an open
00:04:24.400
mind. All the questions are biased and pointed. You should see his most Twitter post with, of jump
00:04:31.340
cuts. Okay. I'll look at the Twitter later. Yeah. Trigonometry. I went on this trigonometry podcast
00:04:36.540
and they fricking, um, what do you call it? At the end, they just were like hammering me with the
00:04:43.140
Nick questions. And I was just like, you know, I don't really want to talk about this. And they just
00:04:46.960
kept going. And not only that, they made the worst trailer ever. I was so irritated. I was like,
00:04:55.080
that whole interview didn't, didn't leave the, you know, best taste in my mouth, to be honest.
00:05:00.880
You know, I felt like it was kind of like a trap interview. Um, I thought, cause I set it up so
00:05:06.640
much further back. I thought it was just a general interview about my life. It was not.
00:05:11.980
I would appreciate it. I would like to hear what Andrew has got to say about the fact that
00:05:16.180
when you make controversial statements, it attracts people to follow you. And then you direct them to
00:05:22.540
your website where they pay you a monthly fee to learn how to be like you. And so the more
00:05:27.620
controversial statements you make, the more money you get. The fact that that's the path
00:05:32.200
you've outlined to one, my online university and two, my presence on the internet. The fact
00:05:38.100
that you believe that's the path just shows you've done absolutely zero research.
00:05:43.280
Okay. People always throw this one at me too. Are there are corporate versions of
00:05:48.060
Abba and Preach? Yeah. Yes. They do the same thing. They pull clip, clip, clip, clip, clip to
00:05:57.400
spin a narrative. And then the, the reaction channels get so mad when we start calling this
00:06:01.760
stuff out. It's so funny. They get so mad. They're like, Oh, you're out of context as a cope. And we're
00:06:07.580
like, no, this very clearly was out of context. But anyways, anyways, back to, back to Tate.
00:06:13.480
They don't go into things with an open mind. They're just looking to spin a narrative. TMZ,
00:06:26.600
Okay. So how many of the people who sign up for Hustlers University come to you through your social
00:06:31.140
media? Oh, oh, sorry. I forgot what I was going to say earlier. I get this a lot that if I say
00:06:36.260
something controversial and I'm just doing it for clicks and views and okay, you might say something
00:06:41.260
in an entertaining way to be funny. And then people will be like, Oh, you're just triggering
00:06:47.120
people or you're this. I'm like, no, I mean, sometimes you say things in an entertaining way
00:06:52.260
to be funny. I mean, that's part of media, but to say you're just trying to trigger people for no
00:06:59.760
reason. It's like, if you just, if you just have controversial opinions, then you're just doing
00:07:08.020
it for the, I hate these reporters. Genuinely zero research. How many of the people who sign
00:07:13.880
up for Hustlers University come to you through your social media where you direct them to the
00:07:18.340
website? And Lucy, I encourage you to go out there, do some genuine research, watch my videos,
00:07:22.480
of course, watch my videos at length and truly understand what I'm doing. How many of the people
00:07:27.540
who sign up for Hustlers University at $49.99 a month come to you because they see your social
00:07:34.480
media comments? There's an online school called Hustlers University, which I don't own. I
00:07:40.340
influence for along with many other influencers. And they sign up for your website, which I don't
00:07:44.520
own. And once again, that's, once again, once, once again, that's nothing to do with me. And
00:07:48.580
you're going to sit here and say that I made a joke. I made a joke online four years ago because
00:07:53.840
a woman said that she owned her man's car and you made a joke. And that means that you, because
00:07:57.720
you have the most misogynistic, dangerous man in the world. This is going down a path of absolute
00:08:01.980
insanity. It's not true. None of this is true. I don't hurt people. I don't harm people. I'm
00:08:05.980
genuinely a positive influence. I'm, I'm renowned for offensive and controversial. That's not why
00:08:10.700
I'm renowned. I'm actually renowned. But when I interview people on the street, there's tons of
00:08:15.900
people that say he changed their life, got them to start working out, got them to start making more
00:08:22.080
money, get a better job. Like I've done these interviews. So to say he's just, everyone doesn't
00:08:28.600
like him. He's just a force for negative. It's not true. I'm actually renowned for helping young
00:08:33.220
men because we talk about there's a men's mental health crisis and we talk about, we pretend to
00:08:36.500
care that men are upset. But as soon as I discuss men's issues, it's misogynistic. It doesn't have
00:08:40.660
to be gender. Just because I believe men have a point of view and men have rights and men are allowed
00:08:45.000
to think and believe and act a certain way that helps them internally. That doesn't mean it's anti-female.
00:08:49.560
In fact, I believe it's actually pro-female. I think when a man is true to his influence and true to
00:08:53.700
his essence and he's good within himself, he's a positive influence in the world and he's positive for the
00:08:57.880
women around him. Just because I discuss men's issues, people say, oh, you're anti-woman. I'm not
00:09:02.200
anti-woman. I love women. Why are so many women saying that when their boyfriends start following
00:09:06.260
you, they're not. They experience more control. So many. They experience more abuse. How many?
00:09:12.980
Enough. Enough. Enough. Well, that's the first time. Not more control. It's because modern women want
00:09:21.420
to do damn near whatever they want. So they'll be like, the girls will be like, oh, I want to go to the
00:09:26.640
club and wear damn near nothing. And, you know, the boyfriends will watch Tate and say, you know,
00:09:32.840
maybe we don't do that anymore. Let's like, that's not okay with me. Oh, I'm being abused. It's like
00:09:39.560
women call everything abuse. I'm sorry. I have, I've done shows for too long. I've done them for