Modern Women Have Always Existed... Even In The 1950s
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
124.736435
Summary
In this episode of Pearl's World, host, Pearl Jamison interviews Andrew Klavan. They talk about women in the kitchen, modern women have always been modern, and why women should be paid the same as men.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
where I cover this week's not only, you know, guys, I don't like to limit it to the treachery,
00:00:06.900
debauchery, and craziness, because I just have so much stuff I'm interested in, so much stuff I
00:00:12.920
want to say, that I think it's almost a disservice to call it the treachery, debauchery, and craziness.
00:00:20.380
It's Pearl's world. You guys are just living in it. Okay, so today,
00:00:25.740
before we start, guys, we are demonetized. Yes, yes, and if YouTube is watching this,
00:00:35.280
please let me back into the partner program. Oh, please, please, oh, please, oh, please. I'll be
00:00:42.420
good. I'll be good. Right, Blessing? Right, Blessing? Oh, yeah. Are you going to show them the kitchen
00:00:48.780
cam? Not today. Well, why not? Guys, we got a kitchen cam. So, so, whenever I have women,
00:00:58.540
you know, people always say to me, Pearl, why don't you go back to the kitchen? Well, now I can mid-show.
00:01:06.300
Hello, hello. Look, we got a kitchen cam, a kitchen cam up in here. Okay, so guys,
00:01:12.120
we are demonetized. So, if you're feeling so kind, feel free to send a cash app or a Venmo.
00:01:19.100
And if I see it during the show, I'm going to check every, like, half hour or show. Oh, my gosh,
00:01:23.900
or so. I will read it. All right, I'll read it. So, today, I believe, what did we title the show?
00:01:30.860
I titled it Modern Women Have Always Existed. Was that it? Yeah, that's it. Okay, yeah. So,
00:01:36.680
I titled it Modern Women Have Always Existed. And the reason that I titled it that is because
00:01:45.860
before I really started doing a deep dive into red pill conservative topics, I thought that
00:01:53.000
all of this craziness we're seeing was new. Now, to be fair, the level of craziness that we have now
00:02:03.120
is definitely new. Social media exacerbates it. But the more I read through history,
00:02:11.120
women have always been women. And women have just, we see, not all women. I got to be careful here.
00:02:25.380
Many, many, many women have acted many. There are not, not the whole group, not the entire group,
00:02:38.280
okay. But a portion of women have always acted the same. Modern women have always acted modern.
00:02:46.980
And there have been modern women for hundreds of years. And what made me think of this topic was
00:02:54.420
reviewing my interview with Andrew Klavan. And there are times in interviews, guys,
00:03:01.540
where you're going back and forth with someone. And I'm pretty sure they're wrong about something.
00:03:08.560
But, but, but you never know where the conversation's going to go. You know, you go on a show. And I'm
00:03:14.500
labeled it's a conversation. To be fair, it was a conversation. It went where it went. But I wasn't
00:03:20.720
positive this topic was going to come up. So I didn't have it off the top of my head. Look,
00:03:27.840
I'm human. Not everything I can just recite off the top of my head. I got to go double check.
00:03:33.040
And luckily, I double checked and brought it back to you. So I'm going to show you guys the clip
00:03:36.680
that I'm talking about. And by the way, by the way, I just would like to add some corrections.
00:03:42.860
Because I think there's a lot of things that we just repeat that are misconceptions. And they're not
00:03:47.760
wait for it. True. They're not true. Because this is just what we've been told. Okay, so let's pull
00:03:57.660
this up. Well, I think I think I just I just think objectively, like, you can't say that's a good
00:04:04.040
deal when women are paid to leave. It depends. It depends. Because before the laws went bad,
00:04:11.440
they favored men in ways that were tremendously unfair. And I could I could match. Okay,
00:04:17.060
do you see my face right there? That is the face of me thinking. I'm pretty sure that's not true.
00:04:27.520
I'm almost certain. But I don't think I can recite these laws off the top of my head.
00:04:33.880
But it's like, okay, you're trying to be respectful. Okay, I just want you to understand
00:04:37.720
the reals of Pearl. This guy's twice my age. He's a really smart writer. He's been doing this
00:04:43.760
forever. He wouldn't say it that confidently. He wouldn't. If it wasn't true. I mean, because
00:04:56.560
you know, like, he's smart guy. Smarter than me. All right. So
00:05:01.480
you know, but anyways, every story, I can match every story that you tell about bad men with stories
00:05:08.420
of women that happened back in the day where they lost everything. And that
00:05:12.600
So yeah, this is me thinking, is that true? Doesn't sound true. Okay, but let me
00:05:26.400
We're correct. There's writings from the 1800s of men complaining about divorce court then.
00:05:33.960
Yeah, but this isn't like a new, this isn't a new phenomenon. Like there's writings from the 1800s
00:05:39.940
talking about how the man is paying money to his opera. That's me thinking Pearl, what's the law
00:05:45.380
name? What's the law name? Remember the law name? I didn't come to me. It didn't come to me. I'm
00:05:51.460
sorry, guys. I'm sorry. I'm human. I'm human. Everybody's like, Oh, Pearl, Pearl, source, source,
00:06:01.900
source. I'll give you my freaking sources. Gosh, dang it. You people. Okay.
00:06:07.800
Yeah. Like his, um, his wife who's on who's an opera singer and makes more than him.
00:06:12.860
Because naturally, I just think we have a society that naturally wants to protect women.
00:06:17.200
Yeah, but the literature on what happened to women in divorces is extensive and absolutely
00:06:22.620
destructive. I mean, what literature? Oh, my gosh, this is me thinking, okay, but again, again, again,
00:06:28.600
this is me thinking, this is a guy smarter than me. Right? I mean, this is a guy. I know he's a writer.
00:06:36.700
I know he works for the Daily Wire. He's been doing this longer than I have.
00:06:41.880
He's got to be sure about this literature, right?
00:06:46.800
Right? Am I right? Right? I just want you guys to understand what's going through my head during
00:06:53.360
these debates now. To be fair, he probably is smarter than me. But I was pretty sure he didn't
00:07:00.740
know what he was talking about with this top. I was fairly sure. I was fairly sure.
00:07:04.200
You should read some of the stuff from the 19th century.
00:07:08.840
What is it with the Daily Wire and always telling me to read? Because what I'm about to show,
00:07:14.360
it's like, you guys read. Okay, okay. Sorry, sorry, sorry. And I liked Andrew. I'm just,
00:07:19.520
I'm just, you know, it's for the show. Okay, no offense. No offense. Don't take this
00:07:24.080
offensively. Okay, I'm sorry if this is offensive. I don't mean it to be. I just,
00:07:28.880
I want to add corrections. Early 20th century. But do you see me? I'm like, I'm like, which stuff?
00:07:38.160
Because I'm fairly certain. And look, I could be wrong. I could be wrong. You could give me more
00:07:45.840
information than I have now. I could be wrong. I'm not a perfect person.
00:07:52.100
You know? I lost everything. No, I mean, look, it's what you're, what you're actually.
00:07:59.660
You see, that's what it's kind of. Well, I see. Why was my audio there? Like,
00:08:03.720
what was going on? Was that you? What was the, the audio was kind of off. Could have been them.
00:08:07.900
I don't know. I think it's on their side. You think it was on their side? We'll give them tips next
00:08:13.520
time. Okay. But, but that's me asking which, which writings now, normally, normally, I don't do that
00:08:21.720
normally. Okay. Normally in a debate, I go in and good faith, meaning I'm not going to just assume
00:08:27.960
you're making stuff up. I'm not going to assume that I'm going to assume I'm going in in good faith.
00:08:34.080
You're going in in good faith. This has gotten me in trouble. I'll tell you what. And I do find it
00:08:38.860
annoying in conversation when people say source, source, source, source, source, source, source,
00:08:42.620
source. Because sometimes you just need a day to find, I can get it to you. I know where I found it.
00:08:48.840
But off the top of my head, it's like, just give me, give me a fricking second, guys. Let me,
00:08:53.700
let me get on a roll. But this one, I was pretty sure he was wrong. I wasn't positive,
00:09:06.740
but I was pretty sure. And was I right? Was I wrong? Okay.
00:09:12.500
Zane is an overcorrection of something that was bad before. It hasn't always been like this.
00:09:25.280
You know, because, okay, guys, from my point of view, this is a guy, what? He's 70. So you're
00:09:32.200
trying to respect like he's an older guy. You know, you're, you got more life experience, you
00:09:37.460
know, you got more experience in media writing, you know, you're smart. I'm going to give you the
00:09:43.440
CEO of smartness. I'm going to give it to you. You're smarter than me. Congratulate, you know.
00:09:50.460
But I don't think you're correct. I don't think you're right on this.
00:09:54.000
But, but, but I didn't know. I didn't know the laws off the top of my head. We're going to get to
00:10:00.560
them. And people have always struggled with, people have always struggled with the idea of
00:10:07.080
marriage. But see, you see how he keeps going. I'm like, which, which ones, which, which.
00:10:14.640
And I'm trying to be polite. And then, yeah, I'm trying to be anyways.
00:10:17.860
People have been attacking the idea of marriage since the 18th century. I mean, women especially
00:10:24.200
really started out saying that marriage is bad for women. And we're, you know, we're losing all
00:10:29.100
our rights. We're losing all our property. You know, they, it used to be that when you married
00:10:33.380
somebody, your property became your husband's property. You know, those are the laws that were
00:10:37.840
actually in place. And with the first. Men were also, men were also responsible for debt. So any debt
00:10:43.560
the woman incurred, it went on her husband. Yeah. But she was so much less likely to,
00:10:47.580
in those days to incur the kind of debt that women do now. I mean, you know, this is strange.
00:10:53.020
What's strange to me. No, what's strange to me is like, I was trying to, I hate it when I do that.
00:10:58.220
I lick my lips. It's like a tick of mine. I hate it when I do that. Oh my God. I get chapped lips
00:11:03.420
though, you know. I think, I think you have a solid central point, but you kind of have blown it up to
00:11:09.140
something beyond, uh, you've, you've, you've, you're carrying more weight than the argument will
00:11:16.380
hold. I think. I just wanted to know which laws. I'm sorry, guys. I'm not a, I'm what they call
00:11:25.460
out of pocket today. I'm out of pocket. I just, I asked so many times, which laws, which laws,
00:11:30.860
which laws, because I have found, I look for patterns. Okay. And I found this pattern,
00:11:40.940
you know, Pearl's a thinker. I'm a real good thinker. And I just look, I look for patterns.
00:11:49.700
And one pattern I've noticed is that whenever people say that things were so bad for women
00:11:55.740
before there's always, what do you call a catch? So when you say, Oh, the laws were so bad before
00:12:04.260
I'm like, Hmm, where are they? Okay. Well, what, what laws? And I still, I'm still, I'm still a little
00:12:12.780
lost. I'm still a little lost in why and how I wish my mic was a little louder. I'm like, how,
00:12:20.400
how, how were we, give me. You can say that you're not effectively coaching women, coaching men
00:12:29.180
to turn away from a high risk, high reward situation, which is what men do. High risk,
00:12:36.540
high reward is what men do. Okay. Well, my answer to that, I mean, I think it depends how risk,
00:12:44.640
how high risk and how high reward. I mean, what do they get now? They get a wife that gains
00:12:50.020
80% of women gain 20 pounds in the first five years of marriage.
00:12:56.780
I mean, it's not like we're known for purity anymore. So now they get a, they get a fat
00:13:01.060
hoe. I mean, there's exceptions, but they don't make the rule. Okay. Anyways, anyways,
00:13:06.400
anyways, and at what cost at what risk anyways, that's not the point though. That's, I actually
00:13:14.100
didn't even want to go into that, but, but, but what I wanted to talk about is the history of the
00:13:22.160
laws. Yes, guys. Also blessing. Let me know if there's anyone I need to attend to in the chat,
00:13:28.260
please. You know, I can't, I have it on my phone right here, but it's kind of tough to watch.
00:13:33.740
Do you got it blessing? Yeah. And, uh, Rachel is on as well. Well, Rachel, we're going to bring her
00:13:40.260
on in a little bit. I'm going to go. So Rachel, if you're watching, I'm going to come to you.
00:13:45.140
One of my favorite collaborators. Okay. By the way, thank you to Dave, Dane Schneider for the $10
00:13:50.740
super chat. Um, Jason Richer, um, can't stay on, but thanks for making the world a better place.
00:13:57.660
Thank you. Thank you. Cash app as well. Cash app. Glenn Lawrence. We love Glenn. Thank you for the $20
00:14:05.740
super chat guys. I'm going to try to keep going back. So this is from what I've researched. Okay.
00:14:12.220
Now I'm going to give disclaimers here because everyone's just coming at me left and right.
00:14:18.060
I'm not a historian. I'm just a gal that's trying to figure out what's true. I've been raised by a
00:14:27.500
school system that, that teaches me the opposite of what's true. Okay. I was raised to say I'm, I'm an evil
00:14:34.380
colonizer, awful, you know, white lady, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah. And Pearl's just out here trying to,
00:14:44.440
you know, I was told I'm just so oppressed, so oppressed, but I'm just trying to figure out
00:14:50.820
what's true. So from what I found, okay. Basically the reason that everybody thinks,
00:15:01.100
the reason that everybody thinks that women didn't have rights to their children is because there was
00:15:11.660
some lady, let me, let me get her name. I understand. It was a girl named Caroline Norton.
00:15:19.180
Caroline Norton was going through a divorce and for whatever reason, the husband had custody of the
00:15:27.600
children. It was Caroline Norton who brought the lack of maternal custody rights to the attention
00:15:33.440
of the English public. In doing so, she created the misperception, the misperception that under English
00:15:44.460
law prior to 1839, fathers had absolute rights to the custody of the children. Norton entered the world
00:15:51.720
of child custody law when she separated from her husband and he refused to allow her access.
00:16:01.400
Basically this chick wanted, she, she started looking at going through the legal process and she thought,
00:16:09.080
Oh, nah, that's way too much work. I'm just going to do what women do best. Rewrite history.
00:16:19.160
Sorry. Some women, not all women, some women, YouTube, some, some, some, not all. Okay. Rewrite.
00:16:25.160
Have you guys ever had a conversation with your girlfriend, maybe an ex, or we tell a story and you think
00:16:45.560
Please guys put a one in the chat. If that has ever happened to you,
00:16:49.560
are there any ones in the chat or am I just crazy making this stuff up? Any ones in the chat blessing?
00:16:59.880
Dang it. All right. Well, I got, maybe, maybe I'm just making it up. Maybe I should just go,
00:17:08.440
I should go home, you know, just kidding. Okay. Norton argued. All right. So,
00:17:16.280
all right. So there are two historians and previous historians misconstrued this information
00:17:22.360
because of Norton's work because Caroline Norton wrote all of this propaganda that mischaracterized
00:17:32.840
family law. Okay. So Grossenberg and Mason, which are two historians argue that under the system of
00:17:40.040
English law inherited by the colonies and followed by the American courts well into the 1800s,
00:17:45.320
the father had absolute right to the custody of his children. Grossenberg and Mason use this
00:17:51.320
characterization of English legal history to show how 19th century American law diverged from its
00:17:58.200
British counterpart. Under this analysis, the American court acted through the 19th century to
00:18:04.280
replace the Britain system of parental rights with a jurisdiction that focused on maternal rights
00:18:10.600
and the best interest of the child. Norton argued for the passage of her proposed bill and two pamphlets
00:18:17.000
that she distributed to members of parliament. Gosh, I can't talk. These pamphlets revolutionized the
00:18:24.360
public perception of child custody laws by reframing it as an issue of mother and father's competing
00:18:31.240
rights. Noting that whenever the mother claimed custody against the father, the legal decisions
00:18:36.680
that resulted made no reference to the mother's claim, but instead focused exclusively on the rights of
00:18:42.920
the father. Norton sets out to tell the formerly untold aspect of child custody law that is the
00:18:49.240
plight of mothers whose rights have been refused. She details the pain that every mother feels at losing
00:18:56.840
the custody of her child and expounds on the dangerous nature of the law that in many instances forced a
00:19:03.640
mother to choose between the suffering of mother to choose between the suffering at the hands, wait for it,
00:19:07.480
wait for it, again, of a what, of a what, fellas? Abusive husband, of course, and losing access to her
00:19:17.720
children. So this story that we hear of the evil abuse of men has been around forever! Forever!
00:19:28.600
Why do some women, not all women, YouTube, some, some, some, do this? In cases that followed, mothers who
00:19:42.040
sought the custody of their children began to argue for this custody on the novel basis that maternal
00:19:48.440
rights supersede paternal rights. Now, again, I'm thinking, okay, in this interview, guys, I'm thinking,
00:19:55.800
man, this guy is so much smarter than me, he has to, and I'm not saying this to call him, like, not smart,
00:20:03.000
he's clearly a very, very intelligent guy, smarter than me, but I'm just like, when I googled, when I googled
00:20:08.600
parental rights, you know, I, when I googled child custody laws last hundred years, because mind you,
00:20:15.320
that's it, that's a pretty long time ago, that's 1893, okay? The Infant Custody Act, the Infant Custody
00:20:23.080
Act of 1873 changed the direction of the 1839, by the way, that lady passed her law, changed the direction
00:20:30.760
of the 1839 Act by indicating that the correct principle for deciding custody was the needs of the
00:20:37.000
child rather than each parent. Remember that. Remember that. Now, how did that get manipulated to
00:20:51.880
to favor women? Women, wait for it, who were victims of, wait for it, male violence in marriage
00:20:59.880
were given protection under the Matrimonial Clause of 1878. This allowed them to obtain a protection
00:21:07.160
order from the magistrate's court. So it's the same, it's just the same thing over and over again.
00:21:15.240
Okay, a couple cases. One is from 1789, Powell versus Clever. Powell was widely considered to have
00:21:23.960
the established principle that where a father refused to allow his child a wealthier lifestyle
00:21:30.040
than one he himself could provide, then he failed to pay due attention to the interests of the child
00:21:36.280
and therefore lost his parental, right? This principle was used in a series of cases removing children
00:21:42.520
from the ground, from fathers, from the grounds of bankruptcy. So if men went bankrupt,
00:21:47.320
I mean, man loses his job. He's out of luck. He's thinking, oh no. Oh no, my job. I love my job.
00:21:59.160
Did they just take my kids too? So, okay. Well, a C versus B.U. There was a man who had an affair. Now, look it.
00:22:10.360
I don't promote having affairs. Okay. Many of you guys, many of you guys say, Pearl, Pearl, Pearl.
00:22:21.880
But I don't think it makes you a bad dad, okay? I have people I know personally that had dads that
00:22:28.760
look it. I had a friend when I was younger. I mean, her dad cheated on her mom with the stripper.
00:22:40.120
You know what I mean? They stayed together. She was happy. They stayed together.
00:22:44.520
And he was a really great father. He went to her games. He supported her.
00:22:51.240
Man just liked strippers. You know what I mean? I mean, I personally, you might disagree,
00:22:57.640
don't think that makes you a bad dad. The same way I don't think it makes you a bad mom.
00:23:04.040
You could be a very involved mother and not be a good wife. You could be a very involved father and
00:23:11.000
not be a good husband. Okay. There was a man who had an affair and was involved and involved father to
00:23:18.680
the point he homeschooled his children with servants and went to extensive lengths to look
00:23:23.640
after his children. He ended up going to prison because they took his kids after the wife died.
00:23:32.200
The family took the kids from the dead. The wife passed away all because he cheated.
00:23:41.560
Okay. So these are two cases that set precedents moving forward. Okay. Again, I'm not a legal expert.
00:23:49.080
All right. Now, how far back does this go? From what I've found online, and you guys are welcome.
00:23:57.800
If there's corrections in the comments, you know, I'll come back. I don't know. Prior to...
00:24:04.280
This goes back to the 1600s with the parents... God, I can't talk. The parents patrie doctrine,
00:24:14.440
which is Latin for the parent of the nation. In law, it refers to the public policy of the state to
00:24:22.680
intervene against a, wait for it, wait for it, abusive or neglectful parent.
00:24:34.600
Now, who just, just knowing what we know, maybe using common sense,
00:24:38.040
who's going to use this? Really and truly, who's going to, who's going to lose access to the kids?
00:24:50.120
Okay. The 1660 Tenured Abolition Act is a statute that ironically seems designed to strengthen
00:25:00.040
fathers' rights. The Tenured Abolition Act granted fathers the right to appoint guardians to their
00:25:07.160
children by will. According to Blackstone, the effect of the act was to extend the father's empire
00:25:13.320
even after his death. But by involving the courts in child custody, even as enforcers of the father's
00:25:20.600
rights, the Tenured Abolition Act created a tradition of judicial intervention that would eventually
00:25:26.440
undermine those rights. The note traces the development from 1660 to 1839 whereby court
00:25:33.240
supervision of testimony guardians led to the court supervisions of fathers themselves,
00:25:39.000
transforming the empire of the father into the empire of the judge.
00:25:48.520
So I don't know what literature he was talking about.
00:25:51.080
What? But please enlighten me. This is just what I found. Then on top of that.
00:25:59.880
Okay. So we got all the laws. All right. So then we're going to talk about the legal sub subjugation of
00:26:05.640
men. Now, if you guys want to insult me because I'm not the best reader,
00:26:13.240
I'm not going to use any offensive or bullying language. All right. I promise.
00:26:25.080
Now, all right. This is from the legal subjugation of men. And this is the father of the men's rights
00:26:33.080
movement who wrote this. All right. This was in the 1896. So this was, again, everyone says before the
00:26:40.040
60s, you know, 50s were just this magical time. Women have always been women. Men have always been
00:26:48.840
men. Some women, some men. Okay. All right. It has always been in England. It has always been in
00:26:56.600
England been laid down as a fundamental law based on public policy that the custody of the children
00:27:02.520
and their education is a duty incumbent on the father. And mind you, mind you, that's incorrect
00:27:07.880
because he's basing that off of the propaganda that was pushed in the 1830s. That wasn't true.
00:27:12.600
Okay. It is said to be so fundamental that he is not permitted to waive his exercise of right
00:27:18.360
by prenuptial contract. The rule of common law of England is in, of course, in harmony with the
00:27:23.800
policy of all European and Christendom, as well as with the historic conditions of the European
00:27:29.800
social organization, if not with the primal instincts of the race. Nevertheless, fundamental
00:27:35.640
and necessary as the rule may be, the pro-feminist magistrates and judges of England are bent
00:27:43.160
apparently on ignoring it with a light heart. They have not merely retained the old rule that the
00:27:48.420
custody of infants tender years remains with the mother until the age of seven. Oh yeah. I didn't
00:27:54.400
even put that one in there. The tender years doctrine assumes that women are better parents for the kids
00:28:01.840
before the age of seven. That's a sexist law. That's literally, and that was passed in the 1800s.
00:28:12.520
What literature? Please enlighten me. Okay. But they go much further as a matter of course,
00:28:19.280
and without considering at the least the interests of the child or society at large,
00:28:23.580
they hand over the custody and education of all women to the litigant wife whenever she establishes
00:28:29.840
an easy thing to do, a flimsy and often spherical case of the technical cruelty. The victim husband
00:28:37.780
has the privilege of maintaining the children as well as herself out of his property or earnings,
00:28:43.560
and has the added consolation of knowing they will be brought up to detest him. So there we go.
00:28:49.900
Child alienation again. None of this is new. None of this is new. Even in extreme cases where a
00:28:59.840
husband takes with her the children of the marriage, there is particularly no redress for
00:29:07.520
the husband in narrow circumstances. The police courts will not interfere. The divorce courts,
00:29:13.520
as already stated, is extensive to the point of prohibition. In any case, the husband has to face
00:29:21.440
a tribunal already prejudiced in the favor of the female, and the attendant scandal of processes will
00:29:28.280
have no other result than to injure the children and their future prospects on life.
00:29:33.480
Okay. So where did it favor women? And maybe I'm wrong. You know, I could be wrong. I don't know.
00:29:49.660
She's still there? Oh, yeah. I was going to bring her up. Okay. Maybe I'm crazy. I don't know.
00:29:54.400
I mean, Pearl's, that's what they always say. Pearl doesn't know anything. Pearl did it.
00:29:58.320
Look it. I'm just a normal chick. I just, I just Google. I just Google. I was told I need to read
00:30:04.300
more. But, you know, I want to bring in someone that reads a lot. She reads more than anyone I know.
00:30:12.860
You know, so many of you guys say, Pearl, Pearl just hates women and doesn't think they're smart.
00:30:20.900
I think this, I love this woman and think she's incredibly smart. Welcome, Rachel.
00:30:28.320
Am I crazy for, like, pointing this out? Am I wrong? You're basically a historian up here. So you tell me, am I wrong?
00:30:58.320
Can I guess? Can I guess? You were sleeping with somebody.
00:32:51.620
i was gonna i was gonna ask you if you what your thoughts were on this because guys guys
00:33:16.720
i know a good amount of stats but my stats compared to rachel rachel is like an encyclopedia it's so
00:33:23.700
crazy and um okay i don't think women are more nurturing than men because and i'm gonna tell you
00:33:30.940
i'm gonna let you go off i'm gonna give you my three reasons okay
00:33:43.960
what women are more like some women youtube not all women but some women are more likely to commit
00:33:51.000
abuse i i found numbers around 70 percent of the time women commit abuse when it comes to children
00:33:57.260
infanticide is pretty much only done by women it's like rare they i when i was googling it said it's
00:34:05.480
barely ever done by men and women one in three women's had an abortion so if you think did you
00:34:11.400
see that in the clavin debate that was my favorite part when i i said he said that men commit more
00:34:17.740
violent crimes and then i said oh you think abortion's murder don't you
00:34:55.840
well so what do you think you do you agree with me or disagree that women are less nurturing than men
00:35:41.400
I knew it. I knew it. I knew it. I couldn't prove it, but I knew. Sorry, go ahead.