JustPearlyThings - Modern Women Have Always Existed... Even In The 1950s

00:00:00.000 where I cover this week's not only, you know, guys, I don't like to limit it to the treachery,

00:00:06.900 debauchery, and craziness, because I just have so much stuff I'm interested in, so much stuff I

00:00:12.920 want to say, that I think it's almost a disservice to call it the treachery, debauchery, and craziness.

00:00:20.380 It's Pearl's world. You guys are just living in it. Okay, so today,

00:00:25.740 before we start, guys, we are demonetized. Yes, yes, and if YouTube is watching this,

00:00:35.280 please let me back into the partner program. Oh, please, please, oh, please, oh, please. I'll be

00:00:42.420 good. I'll be good. Right, Blessing? Right, Blessing? Oh, yeah. Are you going to show them the kitchen

00:00:48.780 cam? Not today. Well, why not? Guys, we got a kitchen cam. So, so, whenever I have women, 1.00

00:00:58.540 you know, people always say to me, Pearl, why don't you go back to the kitchen? Well, now I can mid-show.

00:01:06.300 Hello, hello. Look, we got a kitchen cam, a kitchen cam up in here. Okay, so guys,

00:01:12.120 we are demonetized. So, if you're feeling so kind, feel free to send a cash app or a Venmo.

00:01:19.100 And if I see it during the show, I'm going to check every, like, half hour or show. Oh, my gosh,

00:01:23.900 or so. I will read it. All right, I'll read it. So, today, I believe, what did we title the show?

00:01:30.860 I titled it Modern Women Have Always Existed. Was that it? Yeah, that's it. Okay, yeah. So, 1.00

00:01:36.680 I titled it Modern Women Have Always Existed. And the reason that I titled it that is because 1.00

00:01:45.860 before I really started doing a deep dive into red pill conservative topics, I thought that

00:01:53.000 all of this craziness we're seeing was new. Now, to be fair, the level of craziness that we have now

00:02:03.120 is definitely new. Social media exacerbates it. But the more I read through history,

00:02:11.120 women have always been women. And women have just, we see, not all women. I got to be careful here.

00:02:21.440 Sorry, guys. Guidelines.

00:02:25.380 Many, many, many women have acted many. There are not, not the whole group, not the entire group,

00:02:38.280 okay. But a portion of women have always acted the same. Modern women have always acted modern. 0.73

00:02:46.980 And there have been modern women for hundreds of years. And what made me think of this topic was

00:02:54.420 reviewing my interview with Andrew Klavan. And there are times in interviews, guys,

00:03:01.540 where you're going back and forth with someone. And I'm pretty sure they're wrong about something.

00:03:08.560 But, but, but you never know where the conversation's going to go. You know, you go on a show. And I'm

00:03:14.500 labeled it's a conversation. To be fair, it was a conversation. It went where it went. But I wasn't

00:03:20.720 positive this topic was going to come up. So I didn't have it off the top of my head. Look,

00:03:27.840 I'm human. Not everything I can just recite off the top of my head. I got to go double check.

00:03:33.040 And luckily, I double checked and brought it back to you. So I'm going to show you guys the clip

00:03:36.680 that I'm talking about. And by the way, by the way, I just would like to add some corrections.

00:03:42.860 Because I think there's a lot of things that we just repeat that are misconceptions. And they're not

00:03:47.760 wait for it. True. They're not true. Because this is just what we've been told. Okay, so let's pull

00:03:57.660 this up. Well, I think I think I just I just think objectively, like, you can't say that's a good

00:04:04.040 deal when women are paid to leave. It depends. It depends. Because before the laws went bad, 1.00

00:04:11.440 they favored men in ways that were tremendously unfair. And I could I could match. Okay,

00:04:17.060 do you see my face right there? That is the face of me thinking. I'm pretty sure that's not true.

00:04:27.520 I'm almost certain. But I don't think I can recite these laws off the top of my head.

00:04:33.880 But it's like, okay, you're trying to be respectful. Okay, I just want you to understand

00:04:37.720 the reals of Pearl. This guy's twice my age. He's a really smart writer. He's been doing this

00:04:43.760 forever. He wouldn't say it that confidently. He wouldn't. If it wasn't true. I mean, because

00:04:56.560 you know, like, he's smart guy. Smarter than me. All right. So

00:05:01.480 you know, but anyways, every story, I can match every story that you tell about bad men with stories

00:05:08.420 of women that happened back in the day where they lost everything. And that

00:05:12.600 So yeah, this is me thinking, is that true? Doesn't sound true. Okay, but let me

00:05:26.400 We're correct. There's writings from the 1800s of men complaining about divorce court then.

00:05:33.960 Yeah, but this isn't like a new, this isn't a new phenomenon. Like there's writings from the 1800s

00:05:39.940 talking about how the man is paying money to his opera. That's me thinking Pearl, what's the law

00:05:45.380 name? What's the law name? Remember the law name? I didn't come to me. It didn't come to me. I'm

00:05:51.460 sorry, guys. I'm sorry. I'm human. I'm human. Everybody's like, Oh, Pearl, Pearl, source, source,

00:06:01.900 source. I'll give you my freaking sources. Gosh, dang it. You people. Okay. 0.91

00:06:07.800 Yeah. Like his, um, his wife who's on who's an opera singer and makes more than him.

00:06:12.860 Because naturally, I just think we have a society that naturally wants to protect women. 0.99

00:06:17.200 Yeah, but the literature on what happened to women in divorces is extensive and absolutely

00:06:22.620 destructive. I mean, what literature? Oh, my gosh, this is me thinking, okay, but again, again, again,

00:06:28.600 this is me thinking, this is a guy smarter than me. Right? I mean, this is a guy. I know he's a writer.

00:06:36.700 I know he works for the Daily Wire. He's been doing this longer than I have.

00:06:41.880 He's got to be sure about this literature, right?

00:06:46.800 Right? Am I right? Right? I just want you guys to understand what's going through my head during

00:06:53.360 these debates now. To be fair, he probably is smarter than me. But I was pretty sure he didn't

00:07:00.740 know what he was talking about with this top. I was fairly sure. I was fairly sure.

00:07:04.200 You should read some of the stuff from the 19th century.

00:07:08.840 What is it with the Daily Wire and always telling me to read? Because what I'm about to show,

00:07:14.360 it's like, you guys read. Okay, okay. Sorry, sorry, sorry. And I liked Andrew. I'm just,

00:07:19.520 I'm just, you know, it's for the show. Okay, no offense. No offense. Don't take this

00:07:24.080 offensively. Okay, I'm sorry if this is offensive. I don't mean it to be. I just,

00:07:28.880 I want to add corrections. Early 20th century. But do you see me? I'm like, I'm like, which stuff?

00:07:38.160 Because I'm fairly certain. And look, I could be wrong. I could be wrong. You could give me more

00:07:45.840 information than I have now. I could be wrong. I'm not a perfect person.

00:07:52.100 You know? I lost everything. No, I mean, look, it's what you're, what you're actually.

00:07:59.660 You see, that's what it's kind of. Well, I see. Why was my audio there? Like,

00:08:03.720 what was going on? Was that you? What was the, the audio was kind of off. Could have been them.

00:08:07.900 I don't know. I think it's on their side. You think it was on their side? We'll give them tips next

00:08:13.520 time. Okay. But, but that's me asking which, which writings now, normally, normally, I don't do that

00:08:21.720 normally. Okay. Normally in a debate, I go in and good faith, meaning I'm not going to just assume

00:08:27.960 you're making stuff up. I'm not going to assume that I'm going to assume I'm going in in good faith.

00:08:34.080 You're going in in good faith. This has gotten me in trouble. I'll tell you what. And I do find it

00:08:38.860 annoying in conversation when people say source, source, source, source, source, source, source,

00:08:42.620 source. Because sometimes you just need a day to find, I can get it to you. I know where I found it.

00:08:48.840 But off the top of my head, it's like, just give me, give me a fricking second, guys. Let me,

00:08:53.700 let me get on a roll. But this one, I was pretty sure he was wrong. I wasn't positive,

00:09:06.740 but I was pretty sure. And was I right? Was I wrong? Okay.

00:09:12.500 Zane is an overcorrection of something that was bad before. It hasn't always been like this.

00:09:19.940 I swear, this is my thought. Are you sure?

00:09:25.280 You know, because, okay, guys, from my point of view, this is a guy, what? He's 70. So you're

00:09:32.200 trying to respect like he's an older guy. You know, you're, you got more life experience, you

00:09:37.460 know, you got more experience in media writing, you know, you're smart. I'm going to give you the

00:09:43.440 CEO of smartness. I'm going to give it to you. You're smarter than me. Congratulate, you know.

00:09:50.460 But I don't think you're correct. I don't think you're right on this.

00:09:54.000 But, but, but I didn't know. I didn't know the laws off the top of my head. We're going to get to

00:10:00.560 them. And people have always struggled with, people have always struggled with the idea of

00:10:07.080 marriage. But see, you see how he keeps going. I'm like, which, which ones, which, which.

00:10:14.640 And I'm trying to be polite. And then, yeah, I'm trying to be anyways.

00:10:17.860 People have been attacking the idea of marriage since the 18th century. I mean, women especially 1.00

00:10:24.200 really started out saying that marriage is bad for women. And we're, you know, we're losing all

00:10:29.100 our rights. We're losing all our property. You know, they, it used to be that when you married

00:10:33.380 somebody, your property became your husband's property. You know, those are the laws that were

00:10:37.840 actually in place. And with the first. Men were also, men were also responsible for debt. So any debt

00:10:43.560 the woman incurred, it went on her husband. Yeah. But she was so much less likely to,

00:10:47.580 in those days to incur the kind of debt that women do now. I mean, you know, this is strange. 0.99

00:10:53.020 What's strange to me. No, what's strange to me is like, I was trying to, I hate it when I do that.

00:10:58.220 I lick my lips. It's like a tick of mine. I hate it when I do that. Oh my God. I get chapped lips

00:11:03.420 though, you know. I think, I think you have a solid central point, but you kind of have blown it up to

00:11:09.140 something beyond, uh, you've, you've, you've, you're carrying more weight than the argument will

00:11:16.380 hold. I think. I just wanted to know which laws. I'm sorry, guys. I'm not a, I'm what they call

00:11:25.460 out of pocket today. I'm out of pocket. I just, I asked so many times, which laws, which laws,

00:11:30.860 which laws, because I have found, I look for patterns. Okay. And I found this pattern,

00:11:40.940 you know, Pearl's a thinker. I'm a real good thinker. And I just look, I look for patterns.

00:11:49.700 And one pattern I've noticed is that whenever people say that things were so bad for women

00:11:55.740 before there's always, what do you call a catch? So when you say, Oh, the laws were so bad before

00:12:04.260 I'm like, Hmm, where are they? Okay. Well, what, what laws? And I still, I'm still, I'm still a little

00:12:12.780 lost. I'm still a little lost in why and how I wish my mic was a little louder. I'm like, how,

00:12:20.400 how, how were we, give me. You can say that you're not effectively coaching women, coaching men

00:12:29.180 to turn away from a high risk, high reward situation, which is what men do. High risk, 0.50

00:12:36.540 high reward is what men do. Okay. Well, my answer to that, I mean, I think it depends how risk,

00:12:44.640 how high risk and how high reward. I mean, what do they get now? They get a wife that gains

00:12:50.020 80% of women gain 20 pounds in the first five years of marriage. 0.99

00:12:56.780 I mean, it's not like we're known for purity anymore. So now they get a, they get a fat

00:13:01.060 hoe. I mean, there's exceptions, but they don't make the rule. Okay. Anyways, anyways,

00:13:06.400 anyways, and at what cost at what risk anyways, that's not the point though. That's, I actually

00:13:14.100 didn't even want to go into that, but, but, but what I wanted to talk about is the history of the

00:13:22.160 laws. Yes, guys. Also blessing. Let me know if there's anyone I need to attend to in the chat,

00:13:28.260 please. You know, I can't, I have it on my phone right here, but it's kind of tough to watch.

00:13:33.740 Do you got it blessing? Yeah. And, uh, Rachel is on as well. Well, Rachel, we're going to bring her

00:13:40.260 on in a little bit. I'm going to go. So Rachel, if you're watching, I'm going to come to you.

00:13:45.140 One of my favorite collaborators. Okay. By the way, thank you to Dave, Dane Schneider for the $10

00:13:50.740 super chat. Um, Jason Richer, um, can't stay on, but thanks for making the world a better place.

00:13:57.660 Thank you. Thank you. Cash app as well. Cash app. Glenn Lawrence. We love Glenn. Thank you for the $20

00:14:05.740 super chat guys. I'm going to try to keep going back. So this is from what I've researched. Okay.

00:14:12.220 Now I'm going to give disclaimers here because everyone's just coming at me left and right.

00:14:18.060 I'm not a historian. I'm just a gal that's trying to figure out what's true. I've been raised by a

00:14:27.500 school system that, that teaches me the opposite of what's true. Okay. I was raised to say I'm, I'm an evil

00:14:34.380 colonizer, awful, you know, white lady, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah. And Pearl's just out here trying to, 1.00

00:14:44.440 you know, I was told I'm just so oppressed, so oppressed, but I'm just trying to figure out

00:14:50.820 what's true. So from what I found, okay. Basically the reason that everybody thinks,

00:15:01.100 the reason that everybody thinks that women didn't have rights to their children is because there was

00:15:11.660 some lady, let me, let me get her name. I understand. It was a girl named Caroline Norton. 0.99

00:15:19.180 Caroline Norton was going through a divorce and for whatever reason, the husband had custody of the 1.00

00:15:27.600 children. It was Caroline Norton who brought the lack of maternal custody rights to the attention 1.00

00:15:33.440 of the English public. In doing so, she created the misperception, the misperception that under English

00:15:44.460 law prior to 1839, fathers had absolute rights to the custody of the children. Norton entered the world 0.55

00:15:51.720 of child custody law when she separated from her husband and he refused to allow her access.

00:16:01.400 Basically this chick wanted, she, she started looking at going through the legal process and she thought, 0.97

00:16:09.080 Oh, nah, that's way too much work. I'm just going to do what women do best. Rewrite history. 1.00

00:16:19.160 Sorry. Some women, not all women, some women, YouTube, some, some, some, not all. Okay. Rewrite. 0.86

00:16:25.160 Have you guys ever had a conversation with your girlfriend, maybe an ex, or we tell a story and you think

00:16:39.080 that is not how it happened at all.

00:16:45.560 Please guys put a one in the chat. If that has ever happened to you,

00:16:49.560 are there any ones in the chat or am I just crazy making this stuff up? Any ones in the chat blessing?

00:16:58.200 Yeah. No, yeah. No ones.

00:16:59.880 Dang it. All right. Well, I got, maybe, maybe I'm just making it up. Maybe I should just go,

00:17:08.440 I should go home, you know, just kidding. Okay. Norton argued. All right. So,

00:17:16.280 all right. So there are two historians and previous historians misconstrued this information

00:17:22.360 because of Norton's work because Caroline Norton wrote all of this propaganda that mischaracterized 1.00

00:17:32.840 family law. Okay. So Grossenberg and Mason, which are two historians argue that under the system of

00:17:40.040 English law inherited by the colonies and followed by the American courts well into the 1800s,

00:17:45.320 the father had absolute right to the custody of his children. Grossenberg and Mason use this

00:17:51.320 characterization of English legal history to show how 19th century American law diverged from its

00:17:58.200 British counterpart. Under this analysis, the American court acted through the 19th century to

00:18:04.280 replace the Britain system of parental rights with a jurisdiction that focused on maternal rights

00:18:10.600 and the best interest of the child. Norton argued for the passage of her proposed bill and two pamphlets

00:18:17.000 that she distributed to members of parliament. Gosh, I can't talk. These pamphlets revolutionized the

00:18:24.360 public perception of child custody laws by reframing it as an issue of mother and father's competing

00:18:31.240 rights. Noting that whenever the mother claimed custody against the father, the legal decisions

00:18:36.680 that resulted made no reference to the mother's claim, but instead focused exclusively on the rights of

00:18:42.920 the father. Norton sets out to tell the formerly untold aspect of child custody law that is the

00:18:49.240 plight of mothers whose rights have been refused. She details the pain that every mother feels at losing

00:18:56.840 the custody of her child and expounds on the dangerous nature of the law that in many instances forced a

00:19:03.640 mother to choose between the suffering of mother to choose between the suffering at the hands, wait for it,

00:19:07.480 wait for it, again, of a what, of a what, fellas? Abusive husband, of course, and losing access to her 0.98

00:19:17.720 children. So this story that we hear of the evil abuse of men has been around forever! Forever!

00:19:28.600 Why do some women, not all women, YouTube, some, some, some, do this? In cases that followed, mothers who 0.95

00:19:42.040 sought the custody of their children began to argue for this custody on the novel basis that maternal 0.79

00:19:48.440 rights supersede paternal rights. Now, again, I'm thinking, okay, in this interview, guys, I'm thinking,

00:19:55.800 man, this guy is so much smarter than me, he has to, and I'm not saying this to call him, like, not smart,

00:20:03.000 he's clearly a very, very intelligent guy, smarter than me, but I'm just like, when I googled, when I googled

00:20:08.600 parental rights, you know, I, when I googled child custody laws last hundred years, because mind you,

00:20:15.320 that's it, that's a pretty long time ago, that's 1893, okay? The Infant Custody Act, the Infant Custody

00:20:23.080 Act of 1873 changed the direction of the 1839, by the way, that lady passed her law, changed the direction 0.99

00:20:30.760 of the 1839 Act by indicating that the correct principle for deciding custody was the needs of the

00:20:37.000 child rather than each parent. Remember that. Remember that. Now, how did that get manipulated to

00:20:51.880 to favor women? Women, wait for it, who were victims of, wait for it, male violence in marriage 0.99

00:20:59.880 were given protection under the Matrimonial Clause of 1878. This allowed them to obtain a protection

00:21:07.160 order from the magistrate's court. So it's the same, it's just the same thing over and over again.

00:21:15.240 Okay, a couple cases. One is from 1789, Powell versus Clever. Powell was widely considered to have

00:21:23.960 the established principle that where a father refused to allow his child a wealthier lifestyle

00:21:30.040 than one he himself could provide, then he failed to pay due attention to the interests of the child

00:21:36.280 and therefore lost his parental, right? This principle was used in a series of cases removing children

00:21:42.520 from the ground, from fathers, from the grounds of bankruptcy. So if men went bankrupt,

00:21:47.320 I mean, man loses his job. He's out of luck. He's thinking, oh no. Oh no, my job. I love my job.

00:21:59.160 Did they just take my kids too? So, okay. Well, a C versus B.U. There was a man who had an affair. Now, look it.

00:22:10.360 I don't promote having affairs. Okay. Many of you guys, many of you guys say, Pearl, Pearl, Pearl.

00:22:17.160 You're for cheating. I'm not for cheating.

00:22:21.880 But I don't think it makes you a bad dad, okay? I have people I know personally that had dads that

00:22:28.760 look it. I had a friend when I was younger. I mean, her dad cheated on her mom with the stripper. 0.99

00:22:40.120 You know what I mean? They stayed together. She was happy. They stayed together.

00:22:44.520 And he was a really great father. He went to her games. He supported her.

00:22:51.240 Man just liked strippers. You know what I mean? I mean, I personally, you might disagree,

00:22:57.640 don't think that makes you a bad dad. The same way I don't think it makes you a bad mom.

00:23:04.040 You could be a very involved mother and not be a good wife. You could be a very involved father and 0.81

00:23:11.000 not be a good husband. Okay. There was a man who had an affair and was involved and involved father to

00:23:18.680 the point he homeschooled his children with servants and went to extensive lengths to look

00:23:23.640 after his children. He ended up going to prison because they took his kids after the wife died.

00:23:32.200 The family took the kids from the dead. The wife passed away all because he cheated.

00:23:41.560 Okay. So these are two cases that set precedents moving forward. Okay. Again, I'm not a legal expert.

00:23:49.080 All right. Now, how far back does this go? From what I've found online, and you guys are welcome.

00:23:57.800 If there's corrections in the comments, you know, I'll come back. I don't know. Prior to...

00:24:04.280 This goes back to the 1600s with the parents... God, I can't talk. The parents patrie doctrine,

00:24:14.440 which is Latin for the parent of the nation. In law, it refers to the public policy of the state to

00:24:22.680 intervene against a, wait for it, wait for it, abusive or neglectful parent.

00:24:34.600 Now, who just, just knowing what we know, maybe using common sense,

00:24:38.040 who's going to use this? Really and truly, who's going to, who's going to lose access to the kids?

00:24:50.120 Okay. The 1660 Tenured Abolition Act is a statute that ironically seems designed to strengthen

00:25:00.040 fathers' rights. The Tenured Abolition Act granted fathers the right to appoint guardians to their

00:25:07.160 children by will. According to Blackstone, the effect of the act was to extend the father's empire

00:25:13.320 even after his death. But by involving the courts in child custody, even as enforcers of the father's

00:25:20.600 rights, the Tenured Abolition Act created a tradition of judicial intervention that would eventually

00:25:26.440 undermine those rights. The note traces the development from 1660 to 1839 whereby court

00:25:33.240 supervision of testimony guardians led to the court supervisions of fathers themselves,

00:25:39.000 transforming the empire of the father into the empire of the judge.

00:25:48.520 So I don't know what literature he was talking about.

00:25:51.080 What? But please enlighten me. This is just what I found. Then on top of that.

00:25:59.880 Okay. So we got all the laws. All right. So then we're going to talk about the legal sub subjugation of

00:26:05.640 men. Now, if you guys want to insult me because I'm not the best reader,

00:26:13.240 I'm not going to use any offensive or bullying language. All right. I promise.

00:26:25.080 Now, all right. This is from the legal subjugation of men. And this is the father of the men's rights 1.00

00:26:33.080 movement who wrote this. All right. This was in the 1896. So this was, again, everyone says before the

00:26:40.040 60s, you know, 50s were just this magical time. Women have always been women. Men have always been

00:26:48.840 men. Some women, some men. Okay. All right. It has always been in England. It has always been in

00:26:56.600 England been laid down as a fundamental law based on public policy that the custody of the children

00:27:02.520 and their education is a duty incumbent on the father. And mind you, mind you, that's incorrect

00:27:07.880 because he's basing that off of the propaganda that was pushed in the 1830s. That wasn't true.

00:27:12.600 Okay. It is said to be so fundamental that he is not permitted to waive his exercise of right

00:27:18.360 by prenuptial contract. The rule of common law of England is in, of course, in harmony with the

00:27:23.800 policy of all European and Christendom, as well as with the historic conditions of the European

00:27:29.800 social organization, if not with the primal instincts of the race. Nevertheless, fundamental

00:27:35.640 and necessary as the rule may be, the pro-feminist magistrates and judges of England are bent 1.00

00:27:43.160 apparently on ignoring it with a light heart. They have not merely retained the old rule that the

00:27:48.420 custody of infants tender years remains with the mother until the age of seven. Oh yeah. I didn't

00:27:54.400 even put that one in there. The tender years doctrine assumes that women are better parents for the kids 1.00

00:28:01.840 before the age of seven. That's a sexist law. That's literally, and that was passed in the 1800s.

00:28:12.520 What literature? Please enlighten me. Okay. But they go much further as a matter of course,

00:28:19.280 and without considering at the least the interests of the child or society at large,

00:28:23.580 they hand over the custody and education of all women to the litigant wife whenever she establishes 1.00

00:28:29.840 an easy thing to do, a flimsy and often spherical case of the technical cruelty. The victim husband

00:28:37.780 has the privilege of maintaining the children as well as herself out of his property or earnings,

00:28:43.560 and has the added consolation of knowing they will be brought up to detest him. So there we go.

00:28:49.900 Child alienation again. None of this is new. None of this is new. Even in extreme cases where a

00:28:59.840 husband takes with her the children of the marriage, there is particularly no redress for

00:29:07.520 the husband in narrow circumstances. The police courts will not interfere. The divorce courts,

00:29:13.520 as already stated, is extensive to the point of prohibition. In any case, the husband has to face

00:29:21.440 a tribunal already prejudiced in the favor of the female, and the attendant scandal of processes will 1.00

00:29:28.280 have no other result than to injure the children and their future prospects on life.

00:29:33.480 Okay. So where did it favor women? And maybe I'm wrong. You know, I could be wrong. I don't know.

00:29:46.160 But is Rachel still there?

00:29:49.660 She's still there? Oh, yeah. I was going to bring her up. Okay. Maybe I'm crazy. I don't know.

00:29:54.400 I mean, Pearl's, that's what they always say. Pearl doesn't know anything. Pearl did it.

00:29:58.320 Look it. I'm just a normal chick. I just, I just Google. I just Google. I was told I need to read

00:30:04.300 more. But, you know, I want to bring in someone that reads a lot. She reads more than anyone I know.

00:30:12.860 You know, so many of you guys say, Pearl, Pearl just hates women and doesn't think they're smart. 0.99

00:30:20.900 I think this, I love this woman and think she's incredibly smart. Welcome, Rachel.

00:30:28.320 Am I crazy for, like, pointing this out? Am I wrong? You're basically a historian up here. So you tell me, am I wrong?

00:30:39.360 No.

00:30:58.320 Can I guess? Can I guess? You were sleeping with somebody.

00:31:21.980 She was looking back.

00:31:28.320 Oh, okay.

00:31:58.320 Oh, I didn't know that. When did they do that?

00:32:18.320 Oh, I didn't know that. When did they do that?

00:32:28.320 Oh, okay.

00:32:51.620 i was gonna i was gonna ask you if you what your thoughts were on this because guys guys

00:33:16.720 i know a good amount of stats but my stats compared to rachel rachel is like an encyclopedia it's so

00:33:23.700 crazy and um okay i don't think women are more nurturing than men because and i'm gonna tell you

00:33:30.940 i'm gonna let you go off i'm gonna give you my three reasons okay 0.98

00:33:43.960 what women are more like some women youtube not all women but some women are more likely to commit

00:33:51.000 abuse i i found numbers around 70 percent of the time women commit abuse when it comes to children 0.99

00:33:57.260 infanticide is pretty much only done by women it's like rare they i when i was googling it said it's 0.99

00:34:05.480 barely ever done by men and women one in three women's had an abortion so if you think did you

00:34:11.400 see that in the clavin debate that was my favorite part when i i said he said that men commit more

00:34:17.740 violent crimes and then i said oh you think abortion's murder don't you

00:34:21.400 yeah

00:34:26.840 yeah

00:34:41.400 okay so what did

00:34:55.840 well so what do you think you do you agree with me or disagree that women are less nurturing than men

00:35:11.400 um

00:35:12.880 one

00:35:13.460 one

00:35:13.620 one

00:35:13.640 one

00:35:13.860 one

00:35:14.460 one

00:35:15.040 two

00:35:28.920 one

00:35:29.020 one

00:35:41.400 I knew it. I knew it. I knew it. I couldn't prove it, but I knew. Sorry, go ahead.

00:36:11.400 I knew it.

00:36:41.400 I knew it.

00:37:11.400 I knew it.

00:37:41.400 I knew it.

00:37:46.400 I knew it.

00:37:51.400 I knew it.

00:37:56.400 I knew it.

00:38:01.400 I knew it.

00:38:06.400 I knew it.

00:38:08.400 I knew it.

00:38:17.400 I knew it.

00:38:18.400 I knew it.

00:38:25.400 I knew it.

00:38:27.400 I knew it.

00:38:29.400 I knew it.

00:38:38.400 I knew it.

00:38:40.400 I knew it.

00:38:49.400 I knew it.

00:38:51.400 I knew it.

00:38:52.400 I knew it.

JustPearlyThings - March 01, 2024

Modern Women Have Always Existed... Even In The 1950s

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript