Leo D.M.J. Aurini - September 06, 2014


Communism, Fascism, & Democracy: The Three Headed Beast


Episode Stats

Length

19 minutes

Words per Minute

120.31304

Word Count

2,306

Sentence Count

168

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

In this episode, I discuss the ideological differences between International Socialism and National Socialism, and how they are different from each other. I discuss why the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany were so similar, and why they were so different from one another.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Communism and Fascism are the two great boogeymans of the 20th century.
00:00:12.000 If we think about them at all nowadays, we have a very cartoony approach to them.
00:00:19.000 If we think about Communism, we think of Red Dawn with the Soviet troops invading,
00:00:24.000 or we think of the breadlines.
00:00:27.000 In the case of Fascism, we think of Captain America fighting the Red Skull,
00:00:32.000 or the Nazi paratroopers marching down the street with their Hugo Boss designed uniforms.
00:00:40.000 The problem with these views is that it blinds us to what was really going on with these societies,
00:00:47.000 what the nature of the ideology forming them was.
00:00:53.000 We miss the forest for the trees. We see all the details.
00:00:58.000 We don't see the larger animus behind both of these things.
00:01:03.000 And I think the best way to explain what this animus was, this spirit motivating these two societies,
00:01:12.000 is to move away from the words Communism and Fascism and use the alternate titles for these systems of governance.
00:01:22.000 International Socialism and National Socialism.
00:01:28.000 With International Socialism, we see the threat of this ideology immediately in the title.
00:01:37.000 You know, typically, people that think about the Cold War nowadays,
00:01:41.000 they were probably children while the Cold War was going on.
00:01:45.000 And so, to them, all they saw was these two giant nations, these two superpowers,
00:01:53.000 who just could not trust one another, who were paranoid.
00:01:57.000 They both had the atom bomb, and they always expected the other one to launch the atom bomb first.
00:02:03.000 And so you get this extremely tense situation, and it seems ridiculous, it seems idiotic.
00:02:10.000 But when you look at the term International Socialism, you start to see why the Soviets were such a threat.
00:02:17.000 It's international.
00:02:20.000 Their Socialism, it cannot be limited to the Eastern Bloc, it is an international affair.
00:02:28.000 The very premise of International Socialism is that there are two fundamental groups in the world.
00:02:35.000 Workers and capitalists.
00:02:38.000 And that the capitalist class has been oppressing and exploiting the workers throughout all of history.
00:02:47.000 And so by the Soviet ideology, the workers from nation to nation would have more in common with one another
00:02:57.000 than they would with the capitalist class within their nation.
00:03:03.000 To the Soviet mind, the British people in World War II that were united from the highest to the lowest, they were united in the struggle,
00:03:12.000 this was a contradiction in terms to them.
00:03:16.000 Because capitalists can never do anything but exploit, and workers can never do anything but be exploited.
00:03:24.000 The foundations of this ideology is conflict between groups.
00:03:31.000 Rather than defining themselves positively, you know, rather than saying this is the direction our society is going to go in,
00:03:40.000 this is how we are going to get better as time goes on,
00:03:45.000 they could only point to another group and say they're the bad ones,
00:03:49.000 they're the source of all the evil in this world, and they're the ones holding us back.
00:03:54.000 We need to destroy the capitalist so that the workers can unite, the workers can rise.
00:04:00.000 And this will be a global phenomenon.
00:04:03.000 And so you can think of communism, of international socialism, you can think of it as the sickly ideology.
00:04:16.000 It's the one that states that the geniuses, the visionaries, the entrepreneurs,
00:04:24.000 it states that the great people in society are monsters, and that the good people are the people with very little money.
00:04:36.000 It's the people that just have a basic skill and labor.
00:04:41.000 They go down to the lowest common denominator as the location of virtue,
00:04:46.000 while spitting on those who bring genius into the world.
00:04:55.000 You can think of it as the sickly one, that embraces human frailty, human illness, poverty, so on and so forth.
00:05:04.000 They celebrate the weak.
00:05:07.000 Now, with national socialism, what you find is the complete inverse to this.
00:05:16.000 The national socialists, they don't define themselves based upon people outside of their borders.
00:05:27.000 They look internally.
00:05:30.000 And so they come up with a mythos of what makes them great.
00:05:35.000 You know, let's look at the Nazis, specifically.
00:05:39.000 They had the whole Teutonic myth about how the German people were the chosen people,
00:05:45.000 the best and most perfect people on the planet.
00:05:50.000 But just like the international socialists must attack the capitalists,
00:05:56.000 the national socialists, they must attack as well.
00:06:01.000 Because it's not enough to make this affirmation.
00:06:05.000 You know, it's not enough to say that the blonde, blue-eyed people are the best people.
00:06:13.000 Because Germany, in the 1930s, they had just suffered the defeat of World War I.
00:06:20.000 So, if you said the German people were the best, the question is, well, why aren't we the best then?
00:06:29.000 Why are we in second place?
00:06:31.000 Why is there so much poverty in Germany?
00:06:34.000 And so the response, the response is not that we must keep working on ourselves and moving forward to achieve this ideal, no.
00:06:44.000 No, the response is to blame the failures on some other group.
00:06:50.000 And in the case of Germany, it was the Jews, the Gypsies, and the Communists.
00:06:57.000 Those people undermined us in World War I.
00:07:00.000 They're at fault. They are evil.
00:07:05.000 And so with Germany, they did celebrate positive ideals.
00:07:12.000 They celebrated the visionary, the accomplished athlete, the musician.
00:07:21.000 But they could only celebrate these ideals while hating another group.
00:07:28.000 And so just like international socialism creates the conflict between capitalists and workers,
00:07:36.000 National socialism requires a similar conflict.
00:07:41.000 It needs another group to blame all of its problems on.
00:07:46.000 Rather than having an ideal that it's working towards,
00:07:51.000 and the same thing with communism, rather than having an ideal society it's working towards,
00:07:56.000 they must have a scapegoat to blame for why we're not there already.
00:08:02.000 They are utopian in that both of them promise heaven on earth.
00:08:08.000 They promise when we finally kill all the capitalists,
00:08:11.000 when we finally get rid of all the Gypsies and Jews,
00:08:14.000 we will have the perfect country.
00:08:16.000 We will have a Reich that will last for a thousand years.
00:08:21.000 But the reality is that neither of them truly has a solution.
00:08:26.000 They have a couple of ideas, maybe.
00:08:29.000 Some of them are maybe even good ideas.
00:08:31.000 But they don't have a solution.
00:08:34.000 And so that's why they must push the evil of the world onto a specific group.
00:08:42.000 And it really is a scapegoat.
00:08:45.000 It's one goat that you put all of the tribe's sins on and then chase off into the wilderness.
00:08:50.000 Now there is a third ideology that came out of the 19th, 20th centuries.
00:09:03.000 And that was democracy.
00:09:05.000 Or perhaps a better term for it might be universal socialism.
00:09:13.000 You know, if you call communism the sickly ideology and fascism, you could call it the boyish ideology.
00:09:30.000 You know, its vision of the man is like something out of a superhero comic book for children.
00:09:38.000 It's very naive. It's very juvenile.
00:09:41.000 And if you call it universal socialism, then I think you'd have to call universal socialism the most schizophrenic of the three.
00:09:52.000 Because let's think about universal socialism.
00:09:55.000 Let's think about American democracy.
00:09:59.000 And how, like the other systems, it needs to break things down into two simplistic groups.
00:10:06.000 A good group and a bad group.
00:10:09.000 In this case, we have the left-right divide in American politics.
00:10:16.000 And see, the funny thing about the left-right divide is how frequently policies swap back and forth between these two groups.
00:10:27.000 Let me give you a couple of examples.
00:10:30.000 Civil rights.
00:10:32.000 Civil rights started out as a republican movement.
00:10:36.000 You see, back in the 40s, the Democrats were the union party.
00:10:42.000 And a lot of these unions did not want to allow black members in.
00:10:47.000 Because that sort of competition would lower their wages.
00:10:51.000 And so the Democrats, in supporting the unions, they were for Jim Crow laws.
00:10:58.000 Whereas the Republicans, representing business interests, were for the removal of Jim Crow laws.
00:11:06.000 They were for civil rights.
00:11:08.000 And yet, over the past 50 years or so, we've seen those policies swap between the two parties.
00:11:17.000 The Democrats are now the ones that appeal to the black vote.
00:11:21.000 And the Republicans are the ones that are supposedly a bunch of old racist white men.
00:11:29.000 Another more recent example would be Obamacare.
00:11:33.000 Obamacare was originally a policy proposal by the Republicans.
00:11:38.000 It was a document they drafted together because if the Democrats ever got close to getting socialized medicine,
00:11:48.000 they were going to propose Obamacare as a halfway solution that still keeps the private industry involved in the whole thing.
00:11:58.000 And yet now, we see Obamacare being a Democrat ideology.
00:12:08.000 Now, certainly, there are temperamental differences.
00:12:13.000 An anonymous conservative wrote an excellent book, which I've linked to it before.
00:12:18.000 It's linked on my website. Go buy that book.
00:12:21.000 About the temperamental differences between the left and the right.
00:12:27.000 That the left tends to attract rabbit people and the right tends to attract wolves.
00:12:33.000 It's a little bit more complex than that.
00:12:35.000 But, absolutely, there are these two trends in the two parties.
00:12:40.000 But the parties themselves, the policies they propose, the policies that swap back and forth between the two parties,
00:12:48.000 are nothing but a distracting sideshow.
00:12:51.000 This is not an Athenian democracy that we have in our modern countries.
00:12:56.000 This is bread and circuses.
00:12:59.000 The whole point of politics and democracy is to distract the mob.
00:13:04.000 You know, the same way that the international socialists,
00:13:09.000 they would tell the people that all of your problems, all of these breadlines, all of this poverty,
00:13:14.000 it's all of that evil capitalism.
00:13:16.000 Those evil capitalists are the ones destroying you.
00:13:21.000 The Nazis would tell their people that the reason your country is such a failure is because those Jews and gypsies plotted to ruin it for us.
00:13:31.000 And democracy, they find their own opposition inside the arena of politics.
00:13:38.000 If you're a Democrat, everything wrong with the country is Republicans.
00:13:42.000 And if you're a Republican, everything wrong with the country is Democrats.
00:13:45.000 When anybody with an ounce of common sense and just a little bit of education can look at these two parties and see how insane both of them are.
00:13:57.000 And how it's, once again, manufactured conflict with this kind of concept of this utopia being in the future.
00:14:09.000 Or being in the 1950s.
00:14:14.000 This utopia that we can never quite achieve, but that the other bad guys are holding us back.
00:14:23.000 You know, bread yesterday, bread today, but always cake tomorrow.
00:14:29.000 All three of these ideologies that the 19th and 20th centuries spawned,
00:14:39.000 all three of them, they come down to socialism.
00:14:45.000 Not the economic principle of how much GDP should be spent on social programs,
00:14:52.000 because you've never had a perfectly anarchist country and you've never had a perfectly socialist country.
00:14:56.000 All of them are somewhere on the spectrum.
00:14:59.000 But socialism are ideology of what it means to be a citizen.
00:15:06.000 And see, these ideologies need to dominate the minds of all the citizens.
00:15:12.000 You know, have you ever heard a politician say,
00:15:15.000 I don't care who you vote for just as long as you vote?
00:15:18.000 That's universal socialism.
00:15:21.000 You know, if you think voting is a waste of time, you're dangerous.
00:15:26.000 You're an enemy.
00:15:28.000 You have crime think going on in your head.
00:15:31.000 Because as long as we keep people voting, people feel like they accomplished something.
00:15:37.000 You know, go sign a petition.
00:15:40.000 You know, go share a picture on Facebook.
00:15:43.000 You know, engage in the political process.
00:15:46.000 You don't notice what's going on.
00:15:50.000 And there's no true higher purpose to any of these societies.
00:15:56.000 You know, the communism, they have their workers' utopia.
00:16:00.000 A pipe dream.
00:16:02.000 You know, the Nazis, they have their Teutonic mythos.
00:16:06.000 Which is just that.
00:16:09.000 A pagan mythos that should have died 2,000 years ago.
00:16:12.000 We should have grown up from that.
00:16:14.000 And then you've got progress.
00:16:19.000 Progressivism in the West.
00:16:22.000 And what's progress?
00:16:23.000 Nobody knows.
00:16:24.000 Nobody can tell you what progress is.
00:16:27.000 And if you predict accurately what the progressives are going to do in five years,
00:16:32.000 they call you a crazy person that's making the slippery slope fallacy.
00:16:37.000 None of these societies truly have an understanding of human virtue, of human nature, of the purpose behind our existence.
00:16:47.000 And to try and compare this abomination that we have in Western country,
00:16:54.000 trying to compare that to Athenian democracy is an absolute joke.
00:16:59.000 You know, say what you will about the old religions in Europe.
00:17:08.000 You know, prior to the 19th century.
00:17:11.000 At least those offered people a direction in life.
00:17:14.000 Something to strive towards.
00:17:16.000 Not just the accumulation of wealth and hating anybody that's not like you.
00:17:23.000 But a deeper purpose.
00:17:26.000 A spiritual purpose.
00:17:28.000 A goal to grow as a person.
00:17:32.000 You know, maybe humans are just venal and stupid,
00:17:41.000 and the only way to run a civilization is to blame all your problems on a scapegoat,
00:17:47.000 and then send that thing off into the wilderness.
00:17:49.000 You know, maybe we need to have a war every so often and kill a bunch of the wrong type of people,
00:17:54.000 just to satisfy the ugliness inside of all of us.
00:17:58.000 Maybe I'm an optimist, and thinking we can do better.
00:18:02.000 But, I think we can.
00:18:06.000 And I really think the solution to all of the crap over the past 200 years is an individual solution.
00:18:17.000 It's bettering ourselves.
00:18:20.000 And it's fighting the monsters when you gotta fight the monsters.
00:18:26.000 But, not getting too wrapped up in this mendacious chicanery.
00:18:34.000 Keep your souls clean, folks.
00:18:36.000 Irene out.
00:18:47.000 Behzleเย angef Smut
00:19:02.000 If you don't even know, I'm not happy to stop.
00:19:04.000 The way to keep the answer is that how you are Guillermo?
00:19:06.000 You seem to have an expense.
00:19:08.000 If you don't need them if you want to buy a buyer from you, or something like that?