Fight Club & CS Lewis
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
108.58837
Summary
In this episode, I discuss the parallels between the movie Fight Club and the book The Abolition of Men by C.S. Lewis, and how the movie celebrates nihilism, while the book is an attack on it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Once we killed bad men, now we liquidate unsocial elements. Virtue has become integration and
00:00:10.000
diligence dynamism, and boys likely to be worthy of a commission are potential officer material.
00:00:16.920
Most wonderful of all the virtues of thrift and temperance and even ordinary intelligence are
00:00:22.080
sales resistance. That is a quote from the book The Abolition of Men by C.S. Lewis, and it
00:00:34.200
has the exact same flavor as the speech in Fight Club about how we are a generation of
00:00:40.960
boys raised by women, about how the world has no place for us, about how we've been reduced
00:00:46.380
to numbers and effects, how we're nothing more than our IKEA furniture and data on a spreadsheet.
00:00:57.740
Both the movie Fight Club and this book The Abolition of Men are focused upon that, about
00:01:04.300
how the individual is being degenerated into an object, how they're being alienated into
00:01:12.860
an object, how society only uses people for what they can produce at the end of the day,
00:01:18.700
how they have no inherent value in the individual person. But here's the interesting thing.
00:01:28.540
Fight Club was a celebration of nihilism, while this book by C.S. Lewis is an attack on it.
00:01:34.300
Now we need to do a brief aside. A brief aside. One of the interesting arrogances of the modern era
00:01:47.740
is how it dismisses all non-scientific knowledge. How it regards the myths and superstitions of prior
00:01:58.060
errors as just that myths and superstitions. They become prejudicially bad things. When,
00:02:06.780
if you actually study the occult at all, you'll see a lot of sense in that, a lot of parallels to what
00:02:15.420
we're learning about humanity nowadays. One example, and I believe this comes from Daoism initially,
00:02:24.060
but it was probably present in a few more cultures, that the left side of the body is the feminine side,
00:02:33.740
and the right is the masculine side. Of course, we know today that the left hemisphere of the brain,
00:02:42.060
which controls the right side, is the analytical, and the right the emotive intuitive side.
00:02:47.980
And the particular one that comes up in this instance, which is why I want to go aside here,
00:02:57.100
is, well, what it reminded me of, was the chakras. In Indian, uh, supposed to call it mysticism,
00:03:06.700
Indian mysticism, there's the the seven chakras of the body, but you can boil them down to three
00:03:13.660
particularly important ones. Uh, the the head, the heart, and the gut. And again, C.S. Lewis, this time
00:03:23.260
quoting Plato, not an Indian source, from, uh, the Republic, by the way, says as follows.
00:03:33.420
As the king covers his executive, so reason and man must rule the mere appetites by means of the
00:03:43.580
spirited elements. The head rules the belly through the chest, the seat, as Alanis tells us, of magnanimity.
00:03:53.580
And even today, in our common language, we still talk about getting a feeling from the gut,
00:04:00.300
going with your gut, going with your gut sense. And that quote, the bit where he quotes Plato,
00:04:17.820
That there's, now there's two types of men in society. Those dominated by the intellect.
00:04:24.540
The intellectuals that think they have such big brains because their chest is just so small.
00:04:30.300
And those guided by low base instinct. Guided by the gut, the groin. The
00:04:39.580
pickup artist that never considers the consequences of their actions. The
00:04:45.420
the degenerate overweight person. That there's a lack of chest. And chest is where you find this
00:04:55.660
combination of the higher intellect, but the purposefulness of the gut. And so this is where
00:05:03.100
you get stuff like love, patriotism, self-sacrifice. All those positive elements that truly make us
00:05:10.060
human. Not mere number crunchers and not mere animals, but something that's a combination of both.
00:05:16.060
And we see this exact progression in Fight Club.
00:05:28.940
In Fight Club, the narrator starts out as a man dominated by intellect. He works as an insurance
00:05:37.420
claim adjuster. He counts numbers all day, reducing people down to little facts and figures. He collects
00:05:44.620
all the garbage that he's supposed to collect in society. And it finally drives him mad.
00:05:51.820
And so then he goes from the mind down to the gut, to the groin. He starts Fight Club,
00:05:58.780
starts having extremely hard sex with Marla, if I'm getting the character's name correctly.
00:06:05.980
It becomes just a visceral being, rejecting the empty world of pure intellectualism.
00:06:17.180
In the final act, we see the nihilism present. But in the book, he discovers the abyss. And in the movie,
00:06:33.900
he becomes the ubermensch. Let's consider the book first.
00:06:38.540
So in the novel, he decides to target the Museum of Natural History, to try and destroy the past.
00:06:53.660
When both the intellectual and the gut fail him, he tries to destroy history, basically causing
00:07:01.660
civilizational suicide. He fails. His friends from the counseling groups show up, but their love isn't
00:07:14.620
enough. He winds up in a mental hospital, and the evilness that he has wrought is still present in the
00:07:20.700
world. He falls into the abyss, losing all faith, falling apart, losing all hope.
00:07:31.660
Now, to go back to C.S. Lewis for a second here.
00:07:42.940
C.S. Lewis, that is what he's writing about in this book. He's talking about the necessity of theology.
00:07:51.980
That theology is a filter to view the world. It's a heuristic that lets you see what's important
00:08:00.940
and what's not. And he points out that something without this filter, that if you can know everything
00:08:08.060
in the universe, if you can perceive everything, you perceive nothing, because nothing has any
00:08:15.580
In regards to science, he says, it might be going too far to say that the modern scientific movement
00:08:24.540
was tainted from its birth, but I think it would be true to say that it was born in an unhealthy
00:08:29.340
neighborhood and at an inauspicious hour. Its triumphs have been too rapid and purchased at too high a price.
00:08:36.860
Reconsideration and something like repentance may be required.
00:08:45.100
See, what he's getting at here is the same thing that I've said about atheist cult before.
00:08:51.500
So what they do is they use the scientific method of questioning things to question things that they
00:08:58.460
consider enemies. So they'll use this analytical method to break down, for instance,
00:09:06.940
arguments against abortion, or they'll break down maybe communism or whatever. Whatever they label
00:09:13.020
as the enemy, they'll start breaking down using the scientific method. But they never seem to realize
00:09:18.860
that that scientific method can also be applied to the things that they believe in. Their ethics and
00:09:24.860
their theology, which is largely, if not entirely, derived from Christianity. And C.S. Lewis criticizes
00:09:32.780
contemporary intellectuals of his, this was written in 1944, for doing the exact same thing.
00:09:39.820
These intellectuals were trying to teach school children how to see through
00:09:45.020
bullshit propaganda from advertisers. Except the problem was that the methods they used to break down
00:09:52.700
these advertisers could equally as well be applied to beautiful poetry or a celebration of national history.
00:10:07.020
And so the comment that history or that rather science was born at an inauspicious hour
00:10:13.420
can't help reminding me of Professor John Robson, and a link below to his one-hour lecture.
00:10:28.460
Robson argues that how it's typically taught, how history is typically taught, is that the renaissance
00:10:38.380
with the beginning of the modern era, and that the medieval dark ages and the Roman period before that
00:10:47.260
were part of the same dark history of long ago. Robson thinks it's the opposite, that the modern era
00:10:55.900
began with the collapse of Rome and the rise of Christianity. And I mentioned some of this in my last video,
00:11:01.740
about how it was Christianity, the concept of God being a vulnerable baby that could be killed, about God
00:11:10.460
suffering, that led to the conception of slavery being morally wrong.
00:11:21.580
And so to go back to science for a moment, science
00:11:25.340
science was developed during the renaissance era, and the renaissance era was a rediscovery
00:11:33.900
of Roman thought. And so when C.S. Lewis talks about science being born at an ill hour, under ill conditions,
00:11:42.460
you can't help drawing a bit of a connection there between the Roman self-alienation
00:11:48.940
and the way that science alienates us from ourselves. When you apply science hard and fast, you get the concentration camp.
00:12:00.860
We become nothing more than blind products of our genetic code. Nothing has an essence inherent to it
00:12:09.500
that's worthy of anything. It becomes nothing but the raw data that builds it up.
00:12:18.940
And this is why C.S. Lewis says that we need theology, because he somewhat foresaw
00:12:28.460
the world of Fight Club leading to this nihilistic abyss.
00:12:34.220
But something telltale near the end of the book.
00:12:48.380
Perhaps I am asking impossibilities. Perhaps in the nature of things, analytical understanding
00:12:57.820
must always be a basilisk which kills what it sees and only sees by killing.
00:13:07.740
There might be a possibility, he says, that the analytical nature of science
00:13:19.740
He claims not to be an obscuritist, not to be anti-science, not to be a primitivist.
00:13:27.820
He hopes that science can somehow be not analytical and not destructive.
00:13:43.020
I don't think he has much hope of finding a non-corrosive science.
00:14:10.380
why is C.S. Lewis so desperately attacking nihilism?
00:14:28.300
He considered the Nazis more dangerous than the communists.
00:14:44.780
It does involve corroding away your every element, your every bit of faith.
00:15:03.500
In Fight Club the movie, rather than attacking the Museum of Natural History,
00:15:09.260
rather than trying to destroy himself, to destroy history, to destroy humanity,
00:15:19.580
He attacks the buildings that devolve us into mere numbers.
00:15:28.380
And through putting the gun in his mouth and pulling the trigger,
00:15:41.100
In this book, C.S. Lewis actually discusses an early version of transhumanism.
00:15:55.100
He's not thinking about encoding an emulation of a brain on a computer.
00:16:03.560
How eventually science will get to the point where we can breed a man with his own ethics.
00:16:14.220
He acknowledges that biological science will get this powerful.
00:16:20.140
Although in the present era, it looks like it's probably going to be artificial intelligence research
00:16:29.180
The point is that science will eventually allow ourselves to rebuild what a mind is.
00:16:44.060
He points out that a race selected by humanity will be a race limited by humanity.
00:16:57.020
The more technology we have, the more power we have, the less power our descendants have.
00:17:03.020
Because we have made choices for them as to how they will live.
00:17:21.820
The fact that we can go out naked into the void and recreate ourselves.
00:17:33.820
Whether you're talking about the singularity or you're talking philosophically for yourself.
00:17:38.780
C.S. Lewis looked at the Marxists and mistook them for nihilists.
00:17:51.180
They have thrown away objective natural law and replaced it with no other objectivity.
00:18:11.180
And this is why their ideology, their cult, is a cult of death.
00:18:27.340
And that blind search for power will result in extinction sooner or later.
00:18:44.060
That theology will eventually be corroded by mathematical reality.
00:18:51.660
That we are part of a universe that doesn't care about us.
00:18:57.020
But that we can build ourselves to be something greater.
00:19:00.300
The nihilism and Christianity aren't quite as deeply opposed as most Christians seem to believe.
00:19:23.260
And it's Marxists that we truly have to worry about.
00:19:44.300
I saw the truth with that it is abeiwa of Warlock.
00:19:46.460
And it is exactly what weeeeeeable to taste the truth about it.