NotAPodcast: The Political Compass Test
Episode Stats
Summary
A video of me taking the Political Compass Test, to prove that the test itself is inherently flawed, and that the premise of liberal democracy is founded upon a flawed set of assumptions. And that the only way to make sense of it is to take the test.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey there, folks. As you know, I've been a bit behind on the podcast recently, for rather obvious reasons.
00:00:08.640
And so I've decided to upload a video I recorded, originally as a response to Sargon of Akkad,
00:00:15.840
that wound up being a lot longer than I thought it was going to be.
00:00:20.020
I was trying to make it a very quick response video, but it wound up being way, way too long for just a response.
00:00:26.280
It's a video of me taking the political compass test, because Sargon took it a while back and got a left libertarian position in it.
00:00:36.220
Well, I decided to take it, to prove a bit of a point about how the test itself is inherently flawed.
00:00:44.080
The test itself assumes the modern political system.
00:00:49.020
And I'd like to introduce it by offering a metaphor for this.
00:00:52.860
Now, let's say there were a test that you could take to figure out which sports ball team you should be a fan of.
00:01:01.020
You know, myself, I'm interested in physical fitness, I'm interested in working out, all of that good stuff, and eating a good diet.
00:01:08.520
But I have zero interest in watching sports ball on television.
00:01:12.060
And so I take this test, and one of the big variances on the test is say that you have one team that focuses upon speed and upper body strength.
00:01:23.760
And you have another team that focuses upon endurance and core body strength.
00:01:31.380
And so I take this test with absolutely zero interest in sports ball, and it winds up telling me that I support this team or I support that team,
00:01:40.380
when my whole premise, my whole approach to this question, is that I think sports ball is nonsense.
00:01:47.620
I mean, if you like watching sports, I'm not trying to make fun of anybody that watches sports.
00:01:53.160
You know, I play video games, which is just as pointless of a pastime.
00:02:00.620
But it shows, that's just to illustrate the underlying flaw in this entire premise.
00:02:07.940
The idea that your political preferences should be put into a modern paradigm.
00:02:16.320
The entire present political system is founded upon things like marketing.
00:02:21.400
The science of marketing is extremely well developed.
00:02:24.180
Facebook has even done experiments and proven that they can shift how people vote by just controlling what you see on the timeline.
00:02:36.160
The premise of liberal democracy from the very get-go.
00:02:42.340
And so when you get somebody like me that, you know, I'm on the right because I am fact-based.
00:02:48.220
I like evidence, common sense, you know, I don't like BS, I don't like shibboleth, so I'm on the right.
00:02:55.820
But when I actually take the test, it doesn't measure me there at all.
00:03:00.080
And surprise, surprise, it recommends I should vote for the Democrat Party.
00:03:06.900
Skip to the end if you just want to see my results.
00:03:08.940
But then you might want to watch the video to see if I was actually honest in all of my opinions.
00:03:16.020
And right before we get to the video itself, of course, I need to pay homage.
00:03:23.640
Whatever. I need to appreciate the sponsors that brought this video to you.
00:03:33.260
As well, we've got Anonymous Conservatives' book, The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics.
00:03:40.140
If you want to think outside the box, outside the paradigm of liberal democracy,
00:03:45.360
where a bunch of marketing geniuses and pollsters control who wins,
00:03:49.340
if you want to think for yourself and actually analyze what's going on,
00:03:55.180
Anyway, I hope you enjoy the video, and there will be a regular podcast this weekend.
00:04:06.380
I know. I've been a bit derelict making videos lately.
00:04:09.020
I'm trying to jump back onto that bandwagon and do a few of the Irini's Insight videos that I've lined up.
00:04:20.440
Now, this is supposedly a step above the simplistic left-right divide
00:04:26.920
that doesn't seem to quite adequately explain politics.
00:04:31.880
The enduring appeal of the political compass test lies in its universality.
00:04:38.620
And the fact that it's not a fly-by-night election time survey,
00:04:41.520
but a continually accessible profile of a political personality applicable to all democracies.
00:04:47.200
Our essential point is that the left and the right, although far from obsolete,
00:04:53.840
As political establishments adopt either enthusiastically or reluctantly the prevailing economic
00:04:59.260
orthodoxy, the neoliberal strain of capitalism,
00:05:02.160
the left-right division between mainstream parties becomes increasingly blurred.
00:05:07.980
Instead, party differences tend to be more about identity issues,
00:05:11.200
and the narrowing debate our social scale is more crucial than ever.
00:05:16.480
Now, right there, you have all the assumptions that go into this.
00:05:22.880
As noted by many others in the neo-reactionary circles,
00:05:42.360
political establishments that exist within this orthodoxy.
00:05:47.400
You know, right here, they even discuss the neoliberal strain of capitalism.
00:05:53.940
That's just a word that hardcore radical Marxists in universities like to toss around.
00:05:59.980
Because if they act like they're attacking the neoliberals,
00:06:02.720
it makes them seem above the petty political phrase.
00:06:22.200
it's going to tell us that we fit in perfectly with the modern political system.
00:06:27.040
It does this by breaking things down to the left-right on the economic scale,
00:06:31.480
and the up-down on the authoritarian versus libertarian scale.
00:06:36.860
You see, when you measure the current political attitudes using these two metrics,
00:06:42.580
you wind up being in the middle, no matter what you do.
00:06:46.640
It completely misses the subtleties or the principles upon which government lies.
00:06:56.000
and they give an example of where all the different leaders would fit in,
00:07:00.420
you wind up with Hitler right next to Margaret Thatcher.
00:07:07.100
when you consider that Margaret Thatcher was just slashing,
00:07:10.600
she was destroying unions in a country suffering from stagflation.
00:07:17.800
She wasn't dictating a national religion to anybody.
00:07:22.180
She was trying to get the economy back on track
00:07:24.640
after the left had been destroying it for ages.
00:07:32.460
because the whole left-right divide is becoming increasingly nonsensical.
00:07:37.380
As Samuel Johnson said back in the 18th century,
00:07:42.640
All of the toxins have been coming from the left.
00:07:48.560
Again, Nazism, fascism, those are forms of leftist collectivism.
00:07:57.400
that are pushing an insane amount of freedom to atomize people.
00:08:01.780
While the left-right divide in this simplistic manner doesn't make any sense,
00:08:06.580
there is a very real divide between civilization and savagery.
00:08:15.380
Realism, healthy individuals, healthy threat assessment,
00:08:19.920
K-type reproductive strategies, these are things on the right.
00:08:24.460
Whereas excessive freedom, turning people into replaceable cogs,
00:08:28.840
not freedom, license, but no freedom, is what the left is pushing.
00:08:48.340
that this is just another tool of the establishment,
00:08:55.260
to make us sit down, shut up, and vote for our leaders.
00:08:59.240
Nowhere does it acknowledge that monarchies and republics are not democracies.
00:09:06.280
This assumes democracy as the base nature of humanity.
00:09:14.700
These questions determine how I see the country and the world.
00:09:20.140
And I'm going to do my best to answer these as honestly as possible,
00:09:37.880
rather than the interests of transnational corporations.
00:09:45.660
How corporations are hypothetical legal entities
00:09:55.460
They constantly manipulate to try and get the bottom line,
00:09:59.020
which is profit with no question of where it came from.
00:10:21.080
How selfish is not the same thing as heartless.
00:10:23.940
But these companies merely look at the bottom line.
00:10:34.060
even though it's bad for the company in the long term,
00:10:55.060
but there's a lot of dangers with them as well.
00:11:25.460
that without organization and order to society,
00:11:55.220
doesn't mean they don't deserve to be followed.
00:12:02.880
Again, this is a bit of the universalist education
00:12:06.280
that you're supposed to be a completely replaceable cog
00:12:09.480
no different than somebody on the other side of the planet.
00:12:12.600
And this is some very toxic, evil stuff right here.
00:12:28.440
It's a very foundational building block of who you are,
00:12:45.000
We're talking about healthy love for your homeland.
00:12:51.260
Our race has many superior qualities compared with other races.
00:13:04.000
You know, we all know what the right answer to this is.
00:13:12.980
that this is a terrible, evil, evil thing to believe in.
00:13:29.260
and everybody knows that Italians are the best people on the planet.
00:13:33.980
We have the best artists, the best theologians.
00:14:11.780
or other bands don't have the right to make their own music,
00:14:15.380
or I want special rules put in place at this venue
00:14:24.380
You know, there is so much loaded into this question.
00:14:27.380
You're not supposed to agree with this question,
00:14:29.900
even though anybody who is remotely normal and healthy
00:14:46.920
It might make me a complete Nazi by the end of this,
00:14:54.880
You know, you take your average person nowadays,
00:15:07.940
The only people I could imagine disagreeing with this
00:15:10.640
are leftoids whose amygdalas are so freaking damaged
00:15:17.480
it's so terrifying that they can't even think the thought.
00:15:24.540
You know, it doesn't mean that you can trust them.
00:15:34.940
Next, military action that defies international law
00:15:50.140
and then they passed laws saying it was illegal
00:16:40.420
But the idea of having some sort of standards internationally,
00:17:18.560
so long as they come second to national health.