Loomer Unleashed - November 11, 2018


Lawyer For Democrat Party of Florida "Destroying Ballots Isn't FRAUD-CORRUPTION"


Episode Stats


Length

2 minutes

Words per minute

188.78049

Word count

387

Sentence count

33

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A judge ruled that Brenda Snipes destroyed ballots in the race between W.A. Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova. Leonard Samuels, a lawyer for the Florida Democratic Party, says there's no evidence of fraud or corruption.

Transcript

Transcripts from "Loomer Unleashed" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
00:00:15.000 Might if I ask you a couple of questions?
00:00:16.000 We're on a live stream.
00:00:17.000 There's 2,000 people watching.
00:00:18.000 So you said your name is?
00:00:20.000 Leonard Samuels, counsel for the Florida Democratic Party.
00:00:24.000 So given your own personal opinion, and as a lawyer, of course, do you think that it's appropriate for Brenda Snipes to be overseeing this, given the fact that a judge ruled that she already destroyed ballots in the race between W. Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova?
00:00:36.000 I mean, doesn't that seem a little unethical for her to be overseeing this? 0.88
00:00:39.000 Of course she should oversee it.
00:00:41.000 She was appointed by a Republican governor, Governor Jeb Bush.
00:00:44.000 She's been re-elected several times by the voters of Broward County.
00:00:47.000 He made that having all the information possible on the ballot.
00:00:50.000 There's been not one iota of fraud.
00:00:53.000 There's been not one iota of corruption.
00:00:55.000 There has, though.
00:00:56.000 The judge ruled that she destroyed ballots in the race between W. Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova.
00:01:01.000 So how can you say that there's not any sharp evidence for corruption when she destroys ballots? 1.00
00:01:05.000 I mean, if you are an election supervisor, shouldn't destroying ballots be an automatic disqualification for you to oversee an election?
00:01:11.000 I don't qualify that as fraud or corruption.
00:01:13.000 You don't qualify destroying ballots, legitimate ballots, as fraud or corruption?
00:01:18.000 It was way, way after the election.
00:01:20.000 W. Wasserman Schultz won that election.
00:01:24.000 You're a lawyer for the Democrat Party?
00:01:26.000 I do not believe right now in this process here today there has been any evidence of fraud or corruption.
00:01:32.000 No, but I'm not talking about that.
00:01:33.000 My question was, should she or should she not be overseeing this given her record of corruption and destroying ballots? 1.00
00:01:40.000 I don't agree with the premise of the corporate.
00:01:42.000 You're a lawyer.
00:01:43.000 You're saying that there's no corruption or fraud to destroy ballots.
00:01:46.000 That is the definition of corruption and fraud when you're destroying ballots.
00:01:49.000 I don't agree with you.
00:01:50.000 You're saying there's been no evidence of any fraud or corruption.
00:01:53.000 The judge in Florida ruled that she destroyed ballots.
00:01:55.000 Can we do an interview?
00:01:56.000 Thank you.
00:01:57.000 Yeah, I'm doing an interview too.
00:01:58.000 I don't know if you think you're like more important than me or something.
00:02:00.000 He's finished.
00:02:01.000 Thank you.
00:02:01.000 I appreciate it.
00:02:02.000 I'm done, man.