Louder with Crowder - 20240814_Wed_okgS_-yo7nY

00:00:00.000 Peace.

00:00:11.000 We're gonna need you in 15 for the trio pre-taping.

00:00:11.000 Hey, Steven, heads up.

00:00:13.000 Okay, thanks, Quarter Black.

00:00:15.000 Oh, yeah, and I put some extra mushrooms on that Swiss there for you. 1.00

00:00:17.000 I know you like him some.

00:00:18.000 Oh, thanks, man.

00:00:18.000 I appreciate it.

00:00:19.000 No problem.

00:00:20.000 It made me wonder, at the end of a long week, was this a lie, too?

00:00:25.000 But this, now, the Trump presidency, this is what a crisis of leadership looks and feels like.

00:00:30.000 Hey, Quarter Black? 1.00

00:00:31.000 Every week, another scandal.

00:00:31.000 Yeah?

00:00:33.000 You got these mushrooms again?

00:00:33.000 What'd you say?

00:00:34.000 From a fan.

00:00:36.000 A young couple from Colorado.

00:00:37.000 Rudy Giuliani.

00:00:38.000 You'll see him there on Anand.

00:00:40.000 I have to admit, that's a little bit different from the headlines.

00:00:44.000 But it's quite incredible.

00:00:46.000 I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it.

00:00:48.000 I'm not sure.

00:00:54.000 When I hit rock bottom, I go back to the top of the slide.

00:00:58.000 Where I stop and I take all my beats when I'm right.

00:01:01.000 Then I hit rock bottom and I'm to you again.

00:01:05.000 Yeah.

00:01:10.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah! 1.00

00:01:11.000 Do you know you want me to screw you? 1.00

00:01:15.000 I'm making up crap that I can't tell you Tell me, tell me, tell me! 1.00

00:01:22.000 Come on, tell me! 0.99

00:01:26.000 I may be a liar but I ain't no reporter Have the scare talk

00:01:33.000 He's been behaving this way ever since the politics panel about President Obama

00:01:41.000 Geez Have the scare talk

00:01:45.000 Fabricating fake news Waiting for the axe to come 0.65

00:01:58.000 you Corporation subsured, fate was bloody lackey.

00:02:03.000 Man, I've been a Nazi boy, I've got my sources wrong.

00:02:08.000 I am the Eggman.

00:02:11.000 I look like an Eggman.

00:02:14.000 I am Walrus!

00:02:15.000 K-K-K-JULE! 1.00

00:02:17.000 🎵 Music 🎵 🎵 Sitting in an English garden waiting for a school 🎵

00:02:32.000 you If the scoop don't come, I'll fabricate one, make it up and claim it's news.

00:02:38.000 I am an Eggman.

00:02:40.000 I'll be with you, Brian.

00:02:42.000 My head is an Eggman.

00:02:44.000 Man's view claims his strength.

00:02:46.000 I really do not plan on doing anything with my life.

00:03:06.000 Oh Tell me, tell me, tell me!

00:03:11.000 Come on, tell me the answer!

00:03:15.000 You could be my lover, but I'm a chubby dancer! 1.00

00:03:24.000 Half the standard!

00:03:26.000 Half the standard!

00:03:28.000 Stephen?

00:03:33.000 Yeah?

00:03:33.000 You ready?

00:03:33.000 Uh... Yeah, I was just... And you were, um... No, yeah, I'm good.

00:03:35.000 I think the answer is the... Yeah, I was just... And you were um... No, yeah, I'm good. Are you feeling alright? Oh,

00:03:46.000 oh my god! Join Mug Club today for $89 annually or try it Mugless for $9 a month.

00:04:02.000 You can sign up at ladderwithcreditor.com slash mug club for the entire catalog including Nick DiPaolo, Brian Callum,

00:04:08.000 Mr. Guns and Gear, and of course Alex Jones along with 100% more of this show.

00:04:13.000 ♫ Music Playing ♫ ♫ Music Playing ♫

00:04:17.000 ♫ Music Playing ♫ 5

00:04:20.000 4 3

00:04:22.000 2 1

00:04:24.000 Hut!

00:04:48.000 Mmm. It's minty.

00:04:54.000 That's totally relevant.

00:04:55.000 Glad to be with you.

00:04:57.000 This has actually calmed down me, because you guys don't get to see Run-Thru, but Run-Thru is when... Almost down me?

00:05:02.000 Yeah.

00:05:03.000 Oh, Lord.

00:05:03.000 This has calmed down me.

00:05:04.000 Well, people don't realize, during Run-Thru, we usually just blow a gasket.

00:05:07.000 We're like, I can't believe this!

00:05:08.000 And then we're like, okay, now we have to frame it so that we can serve you with references and, you know, actually add value, because otherwise it would just be us going, All day.

00:05:18.000 That was Ginger Snap. 0.99

00:05:19.000 He was, oh man, he was ready to start killing people.

00:05:21.000 We had a lot of things to add in today. 0.67

00:05:23.000 So look, let me just give you the rundown. 0.98

00:05:25.000 First off, we're going to talk about Stephen Colbert because this man is remarkably inconsistent and he's a liar. 0.96

00:05:32.000 And I don't mean he's a liar in that I'm taking a joke out of context. 0.96

00:05:35.000 I mean he's a propagandist and we have the receipts.

00:05:37.000 We'll prove it with some before and afters.

00:05:38.000 We're going to be comparing some scandals here.

00:05:40.000 I don't know if you know this, but there was a tweet that came out from part of the Donald Trump camp about third world countries.

00:05:46.000 Yeah.

00:05:46.000 And that's a big scandal compared to Kamala Harris, who's been buying fake headlines that Google has allowed and not even told you is an advertisement.

00:05:55.000 Fake headlines.

00:05:56.000 For AP, I believe Axios, Reuters, praising Kamala Harris, they will show up in search, and they will show up as organic news articles that don't actually exist, and Google didn't have a problem with it, and there was also a glitch where it didn't show you that it was sponsored.

00:06:12.000 It's a glitch.

00:06:13.000 Yeah.

00:06:14.000 While she complains about Twitter and the billionaire class. 0.53

00:06:16.000 How much is that in free advertising?

00:06:18.000 You can comment below.

00:06:19.000 Also, we're going to break apart Kamala's new economic surge.

00:06:22.000 A lot of you are concerned about this. 0.98

00:06:23.000 The poll is bullcrap. 0.98

00:06:26.000 I will leave no doubt. 0.98

00:06:28.000 It is a bullcrap poll. 0.89

00:06:29.000 As a matter of fact, the poll, spoiler alert, tells you the exact opposite.

00:06:32.000 That people believe they will be worse off under a Kamala Harris administration.

00:06:36.000 Including with an oversampling of Democrats, so don't allow them to defeat you before anything has actually been played here.

00:06:46.000 And the UAW is swinging Donald Trump and Elon Musk, so we'll talk about that.

00:06:49.000 Whatever.

00:06:49.000 And more, if at some point today, which if we do get into Snow White, I don't know if we have time, I don't like the broad, you may see this on YouTube.

00:06:59.000 Head over to Rumble, because it's a live show.

00:07:01.000 Weekdays, 10 a.m.

00:07:02.000 Eastern, and of course we continue on Mug Club.

00:07:03.000 Mug Club is the only way this show continues.

00:07:05.000 If you enjoy the free show, well, it still only exists because there are other people who've joined up.

00:07:11.000 We're not funded by Qatar over here.

00:07:13.000 Not yet.

00:07:14.000 I'm looking at it.

00:07:15.000 There aren't enough clocks and briefcases in the world.

00:07:18.000 It's true.

00:07:18.000 So, let me ask you this.

00:07:20.000 What do you think is the biggest scandal that the media is not reporting right now?

00:07:24.000 What do you think that is?

00:07:25.000 The Media Malpractice is on full display, but maybe there's something we've missed we'd like to hear from you.

00:07:30.000 Josh Firestein is not here today because he was in an auto accident, and I need to apologize.

00:07:38.000 When he texted me, I thought he was sending me a picture of another lady's car saying, this lady started a three-car pileup. 0.99

00:07:44.000 So let me just preface this really quickly.

00:07:45.000 I read the text as, this lady was in a three-car pileup, hit another car. 1.00

00:07:51.000 And so I'll put my response on the shelf.

00:07:53.000 And then, uh, he actually was saying, this lady hit me in a three-car pileup. 0.97

00:07:57.000 My response was, poor thing.

00:08:00.000 Because I thought it was about the woman, I didn't know what to say, like, I don't know her, poor thing, I hope she's okay, but it sounds like, man, I got hit by a car, and I'm going, oh, poor thing!

00:08:10.000 So my apologies, uh, Josh, he's gonna go get, uh, checked out because he's, uh, not feeling well, so, uh, Keep them in your prayers.

00:08:16.000 And Captain Morgan, CEO number two, how are you?

00:08:18.000 I'm good, how are you?

00:08:19.000 I'm fine.

00:08:19.000 You know what has me excited?

00:08:21.000 What?

00:08:21.000 Here's a person where if you take away the words right-wing extremist, this liberal thinks they're making the case against Trump.

00:08:28.000 It seems like it might as well be a campaign ad.

00:08:30.000 See if you disagree.

00:08:33.000 I wonder what Trump will actually do if he gets back into office? 0.96

00:08:35.000 You don't have to speculate, because he calls his plan Agenda 47, and spoiler alert, it's scary as sh**.

00:08:41.000 Here's some of the worst ideas we're in store for if he wins in November.

00:08:44.000 He's promised to end birthright citizenship, enlist an army to round up and deport millions of undocumented immigrants, and deploy thousands of US troops to the southern border.

00:08:52.000 Trump says he'll ban gender affirming care for trans kids, I'm listening. 1.00

00:08:55.000 Yes.

00:08:55.000 Keep going.

00:08:55.000 helping kids through their transition.

00:08:55.000 Really?

00:08:57.000 He wants to forbid schools from even teaching anything about sex and gender that diverges from the far-right's

00:09:01.000 idea of the nuclear family.

00:09:03.000 The state might be a chance threat to more or less dismantle the federal government.

00:09:07.000 Really?

00:09:08.000 Oh.

00:09:08.000 This is going to purge anyone who could possibly stand up to him and replace them with MAGA loyalists

00:09:13.000 like Stephen Miller.

00:09:14.000 He's going to prosecute his political enemies using traditionally independent orgs like the DOJ

00:09:19.000 as his own personal weapon.

00:09:21.000 I feel like we've experienced this.

00:09:22.000 I know, that's a little weird.

00:09:24.000 ...FCC and FTC.

00:09:25.000 The whole thing is weird as hell, like everything Trump does.

00:09:29.000 But there's nothing funny about Agenda 47 or the possibility that he might be president

00:09:33.000 again.

00:09:34.000 Yes, it's weird as hell, like the nuclear family!

00:09:36.000 Did you see she was saying that?

00:09:37.000 The nuclear family? 0.87

00:09:38.000 This is so sad to me.

00:09:40.000 Black Americans who've actually bought into the idea that the nuclear family is the byproduct of a racist society, or colonialism, or slave ownership, when, okay, let's assume that that's true, which it's not, do you not think you'd be better off with a mom and dad?

00:09:57.000 It's sad to me that anyone has bought into this, the nuclear family. 0.94

00:10:00.000 By the way, I thought you guys liked weird.

00:10:03.000 You have drag shows for kids, and you have kids identifying as cats in school, and they can legally change their driver's license to whatever gender they want. 0.81

00:10:11.000 I thought you were the party of weird, and I say this as someone who's definitively weird.

00:10:14.000 That's the line of attack?

00:10:15.000 Okay, I'm weird.

00:10:16.000 Comment below.

00:10:17.000 Hey, hit the like button if you're weird.

00:10:19.000 I'm weird!

00:10:20.000 I think that men and women are still a thing. 0.62

00:10:22.000 I think we should deport illegal aliens. 1.00

00:10:24.000 And I think that a nuclear family is better than a fatherless or motherless household. 0.63

00:10:29.000 That's me!

00:10:30.000 It's Mr. Weird Science!

00:10:32.000 I mean it's really nice of her though.

00:10:34.000 All Donald Trump has to do is slap a I'm Donald Trump and I approve this message at the end of that and just run it as a campaign ad.

00:10:39.000 I'm Donald Trump and I'm really weird!

00:10:43.000 At least she got the thing right. 0.97

00:10:45.000 What is it?

00:10:47.000 Or Project 47?

00:10:47.000 Agenda 2025?

00:10:48.000 She said the right one.

00:10:51.000 It doesn't prevent them from lying the next time.

00:10:55.000 Also, by the way, you can go and support the Trump campaign by buying the Fight Like Hell shirt that we have.

00:11:01.000 Crottershop.com.

00:11:03.000 It's Fight Like Hell, right?

00:11:04.000 But it's a picture of him with the... I need one of those!

00:11:06.000 With the blood! 0.87

00:11:07.000 Why don't I have one?

00:11:07.000 We have them!

00:11:09.000 You don't have one?

00:11:09.000 I don't have one.

00:11:10.000 I don't have one.

00:11:11.000 It's in my closet.

00:11:13.000 What else is in your closet?

00:11:14.000 Gerald, most of the time. 1.00

00:11:16.000 He's a homo. 1.00

00:11:20.000 Screw you! 1.00

00:11:22.000 Alright, 100% of the proceeds do go to the Trump campaign because I'm not a tech billionaire, but hey, you know what, you guys can help us there. 0.99

00:11:28.000 And I am not unbiased.

00:11:30.000 I do not try and present to be impartial.

00:11:32.000 I want this win.

00:11:37.000 Let's go on to this here.

00:11:39.000 Stephen Colbert, you know, he's gone viral because of the Caitlin Collins moment.

00:11:43.000 So before I move on to his doctoring of audio and I move on to the line of attack against Donald Trump for which they accused Donald Trump of using against Joe Biden because he had a stutter.

00:11:57.000 Anyway, I'm foreshadowing here.

00:11:58.000 He's been going viral because of this clip where Caitlin Collins of CNN, Harry Forum Lady, wasn't in on the joke.

00:12:05.000 Trump has kind of been thrown on his heels by this and he's not really sure how to go after Vice President Harris.

00:12:11.000 He knew his attack lines on President Biden.

00:12:14.000 He really has struggled with how to go after someone who's 20 years younger than him, who is a different gender, a different race.

00:12:21.000 It's kind of been this moment where he has not been able to coalesce around a single attack line.

00:12:27.000 I know you guys are objective over there that you just report the news as it is.

00:12:32.000 Oh, I know.

00:12:32.000 CNN makes a... Was that supposed to be a laugh line?

00:12:35.000 It wasn't supposed to be, but I guess it is.

00:12:38.000 I don't know.

00:12:42.000 It wasn't because of him either.

00:12:44.000 No. 1.00

00:12:45.000 Bring out the gay dancing needle! 1.00

00:12:48.000 I'm sorry, Miss Breastless Wonder. 0.99

00:12:49.000 I thought that this was actually going to go over.

00:12:53.000 Quite well.

00:12:53.000 So that's the reason he's going viral.

00:12:56.000 We covered it yesterday, but then I noticed something because I watch these shows so you don't have to.

00:13:01.000 Not only the inconsistency, that's not what you're about to see, but the completely faked outrage.

00:13:08.000 That's what stood out to me.

00:13:09.000 I watched something this morning.

00:13:10.000 I said, wait a second.

00:13:10.000 I remember five months ago when he acted as though the attack on Joe Biden being incoherent was a soul wounding insult.

00:13:18.000 So that brings us to this installment of Then and Now.

00:13:21.000 Okay, so a couple of things here. This is going to be a multi-part

00:13:31.000 kind of approach. References available. Link in the description.

00:13:34.000 Here is Stephen Colbert now, where he went off on Donald Trump for the Elon Musk X interview, right, and he was late, he was a day late, which surprised me, I think they maybe pre-tape a Monday show, saying that Donald Trump was slurring his speech, but there's even more to it than what you see.

00:13:52.000 Even though the technology was a complete cluster munch, shall we say, so was the actual interview.

00:13:59.000 For some reason, Trump was slurring his words throughout.

00:14:04.000 And many listeners said he sounded like Sylvester the Cat.

00:14:10.000 Now, if that sounds like an exaggeration, listen to the actual audio.

00:14:14.000 We need smart people.

00:14:16.000 He doesn't have that ability.

00:14:17.000 You'll have some that won't do well, but they'll actually be forced to do better because it'll be a pretty bad situation.

00:14:24.000 Now, Musk was clear from the outset that this wouldn't be a hardball interview.

00:14:29.000 I want to emphasize it's a conversation, and it's really intended to just get a feel for what Donald Trump is just like in a conversation.

00:14:40.000 It's hard to catch a vibe about someone if you just don't hear them talk in a normal way.

00:14:46.000 Okay, but what if they talk like their teeth suddenly grew three inches overnight, and their cheeks are stuffed with delicious saltwater taffy?

00:14:54.000 Does that make it easier to catch a vibe?

00:14:57.000 Okay, to be clear, first, no, not funny, but it would be a fair line of attack if Donald Trump had developed a speech impediment overnight.

00:15:04.000 I do believe that it would be, and it certainly would be fair game for comedy.

00:15:07.000 Now, that didn't happen, so it's a false premise, but it's even worse.

00:15:10.000 I want you to listen to the audio again that Stephen Colbert presented, not as a joke, but the audio.

00:15:16.000 We need smart people.

00:15:18.000 He doesn't have that ability.

00:15:20.000 You'll have some that won't do well, but you'll have, but they'll actually be forced to do better because it'll be a pretty bad situation.

00:15:26.000 Okay.

00:15:27.000 So I don't know if he's deliberately joking, but I certainly know that his audience is not aware of what is taking place.

00:15:33.000 I want to make sure that you are.

00:15:35.000 Here is the unedited audio from the original space interview.

00:15:39.000 We need smart people and we need people that have an ability to lead and she doesn't have that ability. You'll 1.00

00:15:46.000 have some that won't do well but you'll have but they'll actually be forced to do better

00:15:50.000 because it'll be a pretty bad situation. And here is the cleaned up audio without those

00:15:55.000 sort of a audio those digital artifacts that Elon Musk released. And she doesn't have

00:16:00.000 that ability you'll have some that won't do well but you'll have but they'll actually be forced to do

00:16:04.000 better because it'll be a pretty bad situation. There you go.

00:16:09.000 Pretty easy.

00:16:10.000 You can comment, does it seem like Stephen Colbert doctored it a little bit?

00:16:14.000 And if he did, was it clear that it was a joke?

00:16:17.000 I'll certainly never be one to fact check a joke, but it doesn't seem like the audience, and the reason I would present the argument that it doesn't seem like it's meant to be a joke is because it is lockstep with the DNC talking points and every single mainstream outlet who are making the same point.

00:16:30.000 So, that's the first point.

00:16:32.000 But he also was attacking him saying he has a less funny sound like he's eating saltwater taffy. Yeah, you know

00:16:38.000 Funny stuff. Yeah stuff stuff like comedy jokes But this brings us back to then

00:16:44.000 where colbert didn't just Say or implicate that it was uh, it was out of line to make

00:16:52.000 fun of joe biden's incoherent babbling But he actually acted as though it was grossly

00:16:58.000 Offensive and discriminatory to even think of mocking joe biden because of a stutter

00:17:04.000 Here's Trump on Saturday mocking the speech impediment Joe Biden has had since childhood.

00:17:09.000 Two nights ago, we all heard Crooked Joe's angry, dark, hate-filled rant of a State of the Union address.

00:17:17.000 Wasn't it?

00:17:18.000 Didn't it bring us together?

00:17:19.000 Remember, he said, I'm going to bring the country together.

00:17:27.000 Wow.

00:17:29.000 And he was, he was, he was, by the way, doing segments on this for a long time.

00:17:32.000 He's had a stutter since he was in.

00:17:33.000 That's not true.

00:17:34.000 No, it's never been true.

00:17:35.000 No.

00:17:36.000 But again, everything is victim currency.

00:17:38.000 And by the way, like I said, I think it's fair game both ways.

00:17:38.000 It's victim status.

00:17:41.000 It's a lie that Joe Biden has a stutter.

00:17:43.000 And it's a lie that Donald Trump was slurring his speech.

00:17:46.000 Both of those are lies.

00:17:48.000 But even if they were both true, If your jokes were predicated on something true, it's fair game to me!

00:17:55.000 It's the double standard, and you take that double standard and you apply it across the board to which views are permissible to be presented, to which views are actually presented on Google, maybe as a sponsored ad versus a non-sponsored ad, to perhaps removing the sitting president of the United States from all digital social media platforms.

00:18:14.000 It's the same perspective.

00:18:15.000 It would be attributable to happenstance if it didn't always line up in one direction all the time with the mistakes.

00:18:24.000 That's my issue.

00:18:25.000 Well, to be fair, you know, President Biden does have a stutter. 0.95

00:18:28.000 It's a brain stutter. 0.94

00:18:29.000 Yes. 0.92

00:18:29.000 A mouth stutter. 0.92

00:18:30.000 Yes.

00:18:31.000 The brain kind of skips kind of like a record sometimes, so. 1.00

00:18:33.000 Well, that's what happens when you get Shutter Island leaned back into water so you suck. 0.99

00:18:36.000 Sniffing little boys. 0.98

00:18:37.000 I don't know if it's an effect.

00:18:38.000 It didn't work.

00:18:39.000 It didn't work.

00:18:40.000 But you know what?

00:18:40.000 Still sniffs.

00:18:41.000 He went for broke.

00:18:42.000 And four months later, after that video, Joe Biden dropped out.

00:18:46.000 Because of his cognitive decline.

00:18:47.000 Sorry, I should say stutter.

00:18:48.000 Because of his stutter.

00:18:49.000 Because of his stutter.

00:18:50.000 And I should clarify, he was forced out.

00:18:52.000 By the mob.

00:18:53.000 And this is not new.

00:18:54.000 Think about it.

00:18:55.000 This is five months ago.

00:18:56.000 Stephen Colbert wants you to believe that he didn't know there was cognitive decline.

00:19:01.000 It's not new.

00:19:02.000 The media's... the media itself has been in decline for years.

00:19:05.000 Extra! Extra!

00:19:07.000 Extra! Extra!

00:19:17.000 Read all about it.

00:19:18.000 Today's headline.

00:19:19.000 Newspapers are a relic.

00:19:22.000 Going out of business.

00:19:23.000 Print media is dead.

00:19:28.000 What?

00:19:31.000 See?

00:19:35.000 But they still serve a purpose.

00:19:37.000 Keep your subscriptions up so we can sell ads for things you don't need.

00:19:40.000 Extra!

00:19:42.000 Extra!

00:19:43.000 I'm hiring.

00:19:48.000 Thanks, Colbert. 0.95

00:19:49.000 What are you going to use to spank your dog? 1.00

00:19:50.000 I mean, come on.

00:19:51.000 I don't need to use... Come on.

00:19:52.000 Joe Louis is a good dog.

00:19:53.000 Well, not your dog.

00:19:54.000 You're going to make the audience upset.

00:19:55.000 Theoretical dog.

00:19:56.000 Yeah.

00:19:57.000 If I want to punish my dog, I just give him one of those indestructible dog toys who wanted to be a sponsor to the show and nearly killed him. 0.98

00:19:57.000 Rub their faces. 0.98

00:20:04.000 And then went out and wrote a... Went out and released social... Like, he didn't plug my... You almost killed my dog! 0.99

00:20:10.000 Yeah, let's not go there.

00:20:11.000 You don't want this plug.

00:20:12.000 Do you want that commercial?

00:20:13.000 You sure about that commercial?

00:20:14.000 All right.

00:20:15.000 Let's move on here to these scandals.

00:20:17.000 Let's compare some scandals.

00:20:18.000 It's fun to compare scandals.

00:20:18.000 Okay.

00:20:20.000 It's salacious, lascivious, outrageous.

00:20:20.000 Scandals.

00:20:23.000 So, again, and going along with the double standard, and this is also, it's going to lead into this recent poll, and why it's inaccurate.

00:20:31.000 Now, I can't verify that all of the polls out there Can be weighted however they want and that they aren't accurately reflecting the American conscience.

00:20:41.000 What I can do is prove that this one poll the media is using as a talking point is verifiably false.

00:20:47.000 And it's important to lay the groundwork here in how the media treats these candidates because that's honestly the first layer before you get to the legitimacy of a poll.

00:20:56.000 Do people have accurate information?

00:20:58.000 Let's go through these scandals and the selective outrage.

00:21:00.000 Trump, this is the scandal that's been trending here for the last 24 hours.

00:21:04.000 The Trump war room put out this tweet.

00:21:06.000 Right?

00:21:06.000 Highlighting basically what are disparities with the migrant crisis before and after.

00:21:11.000 It says your neighborhood under Trump, your neighborhood under Kamala, it says import the third world, become the third world. 0.91

00:21:17.000 Okay.

00:21:18.000 I don't know if you know this, but for the first time a majority of Americans support deportation and certainly actually building a wall and having some kind of border security.

00:21:28.000 However, the media immediately went into attack mode saying that actually this tweet implying that there is a third world This is an ex, a social media post from the campaign, okay?

00:21:44.000 The campaign is backing him up on this, I mean, racist messaging.

00:21:52.000 I understand that they say racist because the picture has some black people.

00:21:55.000 Yeah, but it has Hispanic people too. 0.70

00:21:57.000 Is there one guy that could pass for white in there? 0.73

00:21:59.000 Could be!

00:21:59.000 I mean, I don't know, but show me a bunch of white people coming over the southern border.

00:22:03.000 We'll get to the argument in a minute, but come on!

00:22:04.000 So, hold on a second.

00:22:05.000 It's racist to say that there's a first world and a third world.

00:22:08.000 It's racist now to say that there is an advanced world and there is a technologically challenged world.

00:22:13.000 It's racist to say that there are countries that are superior to other countries.

00:22:16.000 It's the same thing they try to say, referring to any countries as shitholes.

00:22:19.000 was racist. 0.59

00:22:20.000 Remember when he said that? 0.94

00:22:21.000 You're lying!

00:22:22.000 You're lying if you're claiming that you've never used the term shithole to describe a house, to describe a country, to describe a neighborhood. 0.87

00:22:29.000 You are lying left, right, center.

00:22:30.000 I don't care.

00:22:31.000 It's the feigned outrage.

00:22:34.000 Joe Biden stutter!

00:22:36.000 Third world! 0.98

00:22:38.000 Yes, there's a third world, and it looks like that sometimes, okay? 0.97

00:22:41.000 Sometimes it looks like a bunch of people, and you know who maybe understands this a little bit more right now?

00:22:45.000 New York.

00:22:46.000 The New York Post article came out, $5 billion is what they are paying right now to take care of this problem.

00:22:52.000 It's going to double, they think, next year.

00:22:54.000 Can you imagine $10 billion?

00:22:56.000 You know who understands it more?

00:22:57.000 People in the third world. 1.00

00:22:58.000 Yes, that's true.

00:22:59.000 Trying to leave it.

00:23:00.000 Yeah, they're not offended at you referring it. 1.00

00:23:04.000 Referring to it as a shithole because they're trying to leave said hole of shit. 1.00

00:23:09.000 Well they say it's racist when they can't say it's wrong. 1.00

00:23:11.000 Right, exactly.

00:23:13.000 So here are some headlines from The Independent.

00:23:15.000 Trump campaign is dragged for racist post about life under Democrats from Huffington Post.

00:23:18.000 The Trump campaign just tweeted something really racist and then of course that gets amplified by social media and Donald Trump is not afforded the platform to defend himself.

00:23:27.000 Now let's compare that.

00:23:28.000 So that's the scandal.

00:23:29.000 Import the third world, become the third world. 1.00

00:23:32.000 I'm okay with it.

00:23:34.000 Kamala's scandal that the media is not covering.

00:23:37.000 We've been watching CNN.

00:23:39.000 I don't know that they've covered it at all this morning.

00:23:41.000 I could be corrected.

00:23:43.000 You won't be.

00:23:44.000 They got caught running ads that altered real news headlines to ones that were basically praising, they were effectively campaign ads for Kamala, thinly veiled.

00:23:56.000 Not even thinly veiled.

00:23:56.000 They were designed to look like news articles that don't exist.

00:24:02.000 With legitimate, and I use that term loosely, news outlets.

00:24:06.000 So they paid to trick you into believing that there's news out there that doesn't exist.

00:24:10.000 So weird.

00:24:10.000 They were caught.

00:24:12.000 And by the way, some of these ads didn't even include the fact that they were ads.

00:24:15.000 I think you can bring this up, this is overlay B6, uh, with Axios.

00:24:20.000 Google blamed it on a glitch.

00:24:21.000 You know when you search some- how much is that worth in free advertising?

00:24:23.000 Think about it.

00:24:24.000 If you search something like, A, uh, you know, uh, extra wide feet sandals.

00:24:29.000 Who would do that?

00:24:30.000 Mine are coming in finally.

00:24:32.000 I have Hobbit's giant wide feet.

00:24:34.000 And you Google it, and then you see ads, right?

00:24:37.000 Sponsored, sponsored.

00:24:38.000 It's just for any show.

00:24:39.000 You skip it, right?

00:24:40.000 Comment below.

00:24:40.000 Isn't that what you do?

00:24:41.000 You skip it?

00:24:42.000 Same thing if it shows up in your inbox?

00:24:44.000 So how much would you pay To make it look real.

00:24:48.000 It's not that they purchased ads, it's the lie about the ads.

00:24:52.000 And Google, again, when does a glitch ever line up on the other side of the issue?

00:24:56.000 Well how is Google okay with this?

00:24:58.000 So AP and Reuters, the places that they did this with, Axios broke the story, but AP and Reuters were the ones that had the ads that made it look like they had articles.

00:25:05.000 How are they?

00:25:06.000 It's like somebody doing LWC and saying, hey, this came out from Steven Crowder.

00:25:09.000 How is that possible?

00:25:11.000 They're pissed off about it.

00:25:12.000 Google's fine with it.

00:25:12.000 Yes.

00:25:13.000 And then Google says, oh, it was a glitch that they didn't show his ads.

00:25:17.000 I'm like, OK, first off, you're fine with a policy that should not even be legal under advertising rules.

00:25:21.000 You're faking an article.

00:25:23.000 And using a legitimate news organization to make it seem like they're writing it.

00:25:23.000 Right.

00:25:26.000 And second, it glitched?

00:25:28.000 Yeah.

00:25:29.000 Well here let me read you some of the fake news headlines you guys can bring them up and I think we have some side-by-sides where it says so if you would have searched Kamala Harris something let's say in Google search this would show up from AP and you would think it's an AP article where it says VP Harris's economic vision lower costs and higher wages that's actually an ad from the Harris campaign Reuters inflation is down that's a paid ad from the Harris campaign NPR Harris will lower health care costs That's an ad.

00:25:59.000 And it may not have even told you that it was a sponsored ad.

00:26:02.000 It's just a glitch.

00:26:04.000 Think about that for a second.

00:26:05.000 This, by the way, this administration, the White House, you've heard Jen Psaki, you've heard Karen Jean-Pierre, they have wanted misinformation to be barred from big tech. 0.77

00:26:13.000 AP Reuters and NPR are considered Benchmarks, right?

00:26:17.000 They're actually used in determining what is permissible information versus misinformation.

00:26:21.000 These are legitimate news outlets.

00:26:22.000 They've spent years and years telling you, we need these outlets.

00:26:25.000 We need objective journalism.

00:26:27.000 And then they create fake headlines to lie to you.

00:26:31.000 Give the organization legitimacy, then fake a headline and not even tell you it's an ad.

00:26:36.000 As far as I'm concerned, this shouldn't just be a violation.

00:26:39.000 This should be a felony.

00:26:42.000 This should be a serious... This is enough!

00:26:44.000 For stealing the election, to determine this election, at least an attempted steal at this point.

00:26:49.000 It's enough to me.

00:26:50.000 It is a blatant lie.

00:26:51.000 And we caught them this time.

00:26:53.000 How many other times?

00:26:54.000 Why does it keep coming back to Google?

00:26:55.000 How many times have they not been caught?

00:26:56.000 The search for Donald Trump in the assassination, the search for Trump rally, and it always comes back to Harris.

00:26:56.000 Yeah.

00:27:02.000 Why is it always coming back to Google?

00:27:04.000 It seems like every scene of the crime, Google's standing right there going, oops.

00:27:08.000 Yes.

00:27:08.000 And it's only her campaign doing this.

00:27:10.000 Donald Trump's not doing this.

00:27:10.000 Only her campaign.

00:27:12.000 And only her campaign is permitted to do it through Google. 0.99

00:27:15.000 By the way, it's kind of a waste of money.

00:27:16.000 These guys are in the bag for you anyway.

00:27:19.000 The media's carrying your water, why are you doing it?

00:27:20.000 But if people search it, they'll think, oh, this is an article, I'll read it.

00:27:23.000 No, I know, it just seems weird to me.

00:27:25.000 I'm like, well, these guys are already in the bag for you.

00:27:26.000 What are you doing this for?

00:27:29.000 Think about this.

00:27:30.000 Reuters, inflation is down.

00:27:32.000 Think about that.

00:27:34.000 Is there any clear example of propaganda?

00:27:37.000 No, I don't think so.

00:27:38.000 And the report that came out today, and we're not really touching on it much, I think inflation was down to like 2.9%.

00:27:42.000 They're like, it's amazing!

00:27:44.000 I'm like, A, that's a point higher.

00:27:46.000 That's an entire point higher.

00:27:47.000 They wanted it two, that's three.

00:27:49.000 That's a whole lot higher than they wanted.

00:27:51.000 B, Donald Trump never even had it above two.

00:27:54.000 Also, they're going to have to revise this because they often deal with their inflation rates and jobs reports and it's one month.

00:28:00.000 Yeah.

00:28:01.000 Uh, here you go.

00:28:02.000 It was so bad that Kamala was even called out by some left outlets like the New Republic.

00:28:07.000 They said, It's unclear why Harris' campaign felt the need to do this, as there has been plenty of positive coverage of Harris since President Joe Biden withdrew from the race and endorsed her to replace him.

00:28:23.000 It's unclear why they would need to present that the media's bought and paid for when we're clearly already bought and paid for.

00:28:30.000 Yes, why would you do that?

00:28:35.000 Why does she think that she can get away with it? 1.00

00:28:39.000 Because she can.

00:28:40.000 Because she does.

00:28:41.000 The same woman saying, tech billionaires, Elon Musk and Donald Trump, who don't represent the... Okay, what about Meta, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok?

00:28:50.000 What about Google, Alphabet, YouTube?

00:28:52.000 They're all in the bag for you, let alone ABC, NBC, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, CBS.

00:28:59.000 And you want to accuse two places, and you want to shut them down?

00:29:01.000 Rumble and X?

00:29:03.000 Yeah.

00:29:04.000 This is many, many, many tens of millions in free advertising.

00:29:08.000 Because it's a lie.

00:29:09.000 And she has no fear of accountability.

00:29:11.000 That's the issue.

00:29:12.000 These people now have what they used to try and accomplish in secret, they do in the open. 1.00

00:29:17.000 They think you're dumb. 1.00

00:29:19.000 They think you're dumb. 1.00

00:29:21.000 She hasn't given a press conference, she hasn't given an interview, and she hasn't really answered any legitimate questions in 24 days since she's been named the nominee. 0.99

00:29:32.000 24 days.

00:29:34.000 The closest thing she's done to putting out an economic proposal is stealing Donald Trump's policy of no tax on tips! 1.00

00:29:40.000 Which she was against.

00:29:41.000 Essentially by voting for the IRS to come in and make sure you paid taxes on your tips!

00:29:41.000 Yes.

00:29:46.000 Can you imagine?

00:29:47.000 Can you imagine What the media would do if Donald Trump wasn't one altering

00:29:51.000 headlines?

00:29:52.000 Oh, that's right, we already know.

00:30:03.000 Bring up collage B4.

00:30:04.000 This was after the 2016 election where Facebook banned the practice of altering headlines saying that fake news was helping Trump win.

00:30:12.000 Which, of course, was not coming directly from the Trump campaign.

00:30:15.000 It's not the same thing at all.

00:30:15.000 No.

00:30:16.000 They tried to say Russia, Russia, Russia.

00:30:17.000 So we know how they would react.

00:30:18.000 Donald Trump, only Kamala's side is doing this. 1.00

00:30:21.000 They believe you are dumb. 1.00

00:30:22.000 Yeah, but she doesn't just not fear the repercussions. 1.00

00:30:25.000 So she knows the media is not going to come after her.

00:30:27.000 And even if they did, she won't answer the question.

00:30:29.000 She won't answer the question.

00:30:30.000 Right now, this should be the biggest story in media.

00:30:30.000 She'll just move on.

00:30:32.000 They shouldn't be talking about anything.

00:30:34.000 Right now, they're going to talk about this.

00:30:35.000 Trump praises Musk for firing striking workers.

00:30:38.000 That's something we'll talk about here in just a second with the UAW lawsuit against them to the NRLB.

00:30:44.000 This should be the thing they're talking about.

00:30:46.000 Kamala Harris still ducking questions.

00:30:47.000 Kamala Harris still ducking questions.

00:30:49.000 They're not.

00:30:50.000 They're trying to go to Trump slurring his speech.

00:30:51.000 They're trying to go, you said Russia, Russia, Russia.

00:30:53.000 They're saying Iran is the new proxy.

00:30:55.000 Iran is the new foreign interference right now. 0.88

00:30:57.000 They invaded the Trump campaign.

00:30:58.000 They tried to assassinate Donald Trump!

00:31:00.000 And then they put a chart on there, or sorry, they put kind of some bullet points and they say in 2016, Russia, to help Donald Trump, Interfered with the election, and then they just kept going.

00:31:09.000 Like, they're just still living in this fake world where all of these organizations are in the bag for drugs. 1.00

00:31:15.000 They believe you are dumb. 1.00

00:31:16.000 They want you to remain dumb so that they can continue to treat you like you are dumb. 1.00

00:31:21.000 Do we have the clip of the price fixing? 1.00

00:31:23.000 So this is something that stuck out at me.

00:31:25.000 Just, I want you to think of something in your head right now before I play this clip.

00:31:29.000 It's not an actual economic proposal from Kamala Harris.

00:31:33.000 Price fixing.

00:31:34.000 Okay, price-fixing usually means what?

00:31:36.000 Usually means fixing a price, meaning you make it impermissible for that price to change.

00:31:41.000 I know sometimes people miss it, but usually it's a government policy meant to be used during times of shortages, things like that, so that you don't see astronomical inflation, which we have seen.

00:31:49.000 Here is Kamala Harris talking about this.

00:31:53.000 When I was Attorney General, I went after price-fixing schemes.

00:31:57.000 And when I am President, I will continue that work to bring down prices.

00:32:04.000 Okay, alright, so here's the thing, that comes off the heels where she said, I know, and you know, that groceries are still too expensive, even though she tries to say the economy is doing great.

00:32:15.000 And then she blames it on price fixing. 0.98

00:32:17.000 Here's how this doesn't make sense. 0.99

00:32:18.000 I'm sure you probably already know because I don't assume you're dumb. 0.74

00:32:22.000 It is not an example of price fixing if what is going on is what you have referred to as shrinkflation. 0.86

00:32:27.000 To blame the corporations where the prices are going up and the portions or the allotment of goods is actually going down.

00:32:35.000 That's not price-fixing.

00:32:36.000 The price is increasing.

00:32:37.000 That's the primary problem.

00:32:39.000 Price-fixing would be, in this instance, the government stepping in saying, hey, you can't raise the price of orange juice anymore.

00:32:47.000 They've inflated the prices through their policies.

00:32:49.000 You have to deal with it.

00:32:50.000 Their solution is to come in and tell businesses, nope, you can't increase the prices anymore.

00:32:56.000 Well, what do you think happens?

00:32:58.000 The business lays people off!

00:32:59.000 The business goes under!

00:33:01.000 We know how this works because we did it in this country with rent forgiveness against, by the way, constitutional law, according to the Supreme Court, where we said, hey, you don't have to worry about the rent right now.

00:33:11.000 Oh, wait, by the way, you own it?

00:33:12.000 You own it?

00:33:12.000 You're a home provider?

00:33:13.000 You still have to pay the mortgage.

00:33:16.000 What happens?

00:33:17.000 You lose the property.

00:33:18.000 In that instance, it goes to the government.

00:33:20.000 That's why you have these organizations that are too big to fail.

00:33:22.000 Price fixing.

00:33:23.000 We'll just tell businesses they can't increase the prices.

00:33:27.000 Oh, well if that worked, let's just always do it and no one would ever be upset.

00:33:31.000 Problem is it never works and they act like the price fixing, she's trying to blame corporations 0.64

00:33:37.000 by saying, oh, they're artificially keeping the prices high.

00:33:39.000 It's like, no, they're raising prices sometimes to make more money.

00:33:42.000 Fine.

00:33:43.000 You don't like it.

00:33:44.000 Buy another product.

00:33:45.000 If their product is too expensive, the free market works itself out pretty quickly.

00:33:48.000 You go, I don't like this one.

00:33:49.000 I'll go to this one.

00:33:50.000 Right.

00:33:51.000 Very easy stuff to do.

00:33:52.000 But she's saying they're all getting together in a room and saying, hey, let's just keep

00:33:54.000 the prices artificially high.

00:33:56.000 No! The costs went up so they raised prices.

00:33:59.000 You don't like it?

00:34:00.000 Fine, move on to another product.

00:34:01.000 Yeah, people don't understand what price-fixing is fundamentally, and that the really egregious price-fixing, for example, is rent control that you see from the government.

00:34:08.000 You guys ever been to a rent-control apartment in New York?

00:34:11.000 They're actually talking about this right now, the meme.

00:34:12.000 Oh, they're talking about the meme.

00:34:13.000 Let's bring this up really quickly.

00:34:15.000 Is that Anna Navarro? 0.72

00:34:17.000 I used to be a Republican and also very fat. 0.91

00:34:21.000 She is the child of immigrants and I think that is something bad. 1.00

00:34:25.000 This is a guy who has told us that Latino immigrants come here to take black jobs, whatever 0.98

00:34:30.000 that means. 0.98

00:34:31.000 You know exactly what it means.

00:34:33.000 Is she just doing talking points or what? 0.59

00:34:35.000 You know exactly what it means.

00:34:36.000 That it disproportionately affects black workers who work in the jobs that you've, by the way, described when you describe economic injustice and you want to push for equity.

00:34:44.000 You know that they're disproportionately affected by illegal immigrants coming in and working, for example, manual labor jobs. 0.89

00:34:50.000 They steal a higher percentage of jobs from black working Americans than upper middle class white Americans. 1.00

00:34:57.000 Whatever that means, are you stupid? 1.00

00:35:03.000 You know, there was something so repulsive about hearing those two very wealthy guys laughing about firing people. 1.00

00:35:11.000 Doing it in such a kind of a callous manner, right?

00:35:14.000 It's not just what they said, it's how they said it.

00:35:20.000 It's not the substance, it was not nice.

00:35:23.000 The way he said he wanted to fire people, the way that Elon Musk came in and he fired people who wanted to continue to make Twitter a non-profitable company with their net negative stock value, to come in and to fire them and say these people don't know what they're doing, I think that that is mean.

00:35:39.000 Well, why don't you cry about it?

00:35:41.000 She never ran a business.

00:35:42.000 She's never run a business in her life. 1.00

00:35:43.000 Everything that she says is a damn lie, straight from the pit of hell. 1.00

00:35:47.000 Good for her. 1.00

00:35:47.000 She looked better fat. 1.00

00:35:48.000 At least she seemed a little bit happy.

00:35:50.000 And this is, right now at this point, we are, look, the steal is already taking place.

00:35:55.000 There was an election worker fired in Harris County, Texas that did affect the election.

00:35:58.000 We'll talk about that probably tomorrow.

00:36:00.000 It's one county.

00:36:01.000 It's the county that you can prove.

00:36:03.000 It's the ads that we can prove with Kamala Harris.

00:36:04.000 You can't catch all of it, but there's enough.

00:36:07.000 And we are gearing up the election livestream this century, November 5th, 2024.

00:36:10.000 This is the place to tune in, the electoral integrity map.

00:36:13.000 We will be able to not only call states, but to dispute states.

00:36:17.000 No more Arizonas, no more pipes bursting in the middle of the night with No substantiation and they change the story the next day.

00:36:23.000 No more Bristol boards going up in precincts in Detroit.

00:36:25.000 We'll have boots on the ground.

00:36:26.000 We'll have teams in every major city, in every major swing state.

00:36:30.000 And you, volunteers, as well as a guest list that, you know, would make Ed Sullivan blush.

00:36:36.000 I'm jealous.

00:36:37.000 $89 annually, livewithcredit.com.

00:36:39.000 We do need your support to make it happen.

00:36:41.000 Nothing happens in darkness, and plan on watching it on Rumble, because I'm willing to bet that YouTube's going to suspend us.

00:36:47.000 By the way, same company that allowed those fake news ads from Kamala Harris. 0.81

00:36:50.000 Are you starting to get the picture?

00:36:52.000 And plan on watching it for a couple of days.

00:36:54.000 Thanks, Pennsylvania.

00:36:54.000 Yes, yes, exactly.

00:36:56.000 You can't be expected to count the votes in the same day like Florida.

00:37:01.000 Like any third world country in South America. 0.94

00:37:04.000 Can't say third world.

00:37:05.000 Can't say third world because that is racist.

00:37:07.000 I don't want to offend Anna Navarro.

00:37:09.000 You don't want to offend Anna Navarro because she may lose more weight.

00:37:17.000 So they're talking about, and this is what they do, they point to labor unions and they act as though that's you, the working class American.

00:37:23.000 It's not.

00:37:24.000 It's not.

00:37:25.000 So, people are furious now.

00:37:27.000 They've picked up a new thing because the Lisp didn't work, right?

00:37:29.000 The stutter didn't work, the attack against Donald Trump.

00:37:32.000 So now they're saying these people are callous.

00:37:33.000 Elon Musk and Donald Trump joked about firing workers to the point that the UAW, the United Auto Workers Union, filed labor charges against Elon Musk and Donald Trump over laughing on a podcast.

00:37:46.000 What was behind the decision to do it so quickly?

00:37:49.000 Look, because this is the problem in America right now.

00:37:52.000 The rich keep getting richer at the expense of the working class, and people like Donald Trump and Elon Musk, they sneer at labor law, but they don't care about labor law.

00:38:01.000 Because they don't care about working class people. 0.99

00:38:01.000 Shut up, Sean! 0.99

00:38:04.000 They believe in buying off the system, and buying off politicians, and being able to have their way with people. 0.99

00:38:10.000 Look at the science behind you!

00:38:12.000 Employers need to be held accountable in this country when they break the law.

00:38:16.000 So, Donald Trump was talking with Elon Musk about firing people at X, or a clean-up, and then he said, and there are some companies where, oh, if you try and change, we're gonna go on strike, fine, you're all gone.

00:38:25.000 And they laughed.

00:38:26.000 And I laughed!

00:38:27.000 Everybody left.

00:38:28.000 Because it's funny.

00:38:29.000 They self-selected themselves to be fired.

00:38:31.000 Yes.

00:38:32.000 So the UAW filed these charges with the National Labor Relations Board, NLRB.

00:38:39.000 Yeah, we've experienced that.

00:38:39.000 I've heard that before.

00:38:41.000 We've had, you know, former employees who claim to be conservatives then go hire ACLU lawyers.

00:38:45.000 That's ACLU?

00:38:46.000 No, no, that's different, but then ActBlue lawyers and they file it with the NLRB.

00:38:50.000 This is a tactic as old as time, by the way.

00:38:52.000 They do it with employers, ActBlue gets their claws in somebody, the biggest organization, right, that supports the Democrats in the country.

00:38:58.000 They throw lawyers at you to say, file some labor charges, because these are the same people, by the way, who've actively fought against right-to-work states where there's far more economic prosperity.

00:38:58.000 Huge.

00:39:06.000 This was the clip.

00:39:07.000 Oh, I believe we do have the clip that enraged them so.

00:39:10.000 Yeah.

00:39:11.000 And I'd be happy to help out on such a commission.

00:39:13.000 If it were fun.

00:39:13.000 I'd love it.

00:39:14.000 You're the greatest cutter.

00:39:15.000 I look at what you do.

00:39:16.000 You walk in and you just say, do you want a quiz?

00:39:18.000 They go on strike.

00:39:19.000 I won't mention the name of the company, but they go on strike.

00:39:22.000 You're all gone.

00:39:22.000 And you say, that's OK.

00:39:24.000 You're all gone.

00:39:24.000 So every one of you is gone.

00:39:25.000 And you are the greatest.

00:39:26.000 You would be very good.

00:39:28.000 So the UAW filing charges.

00:39:30.000 Listen, go back to that clip of the UAW guy.

00:39:33.000 OK.

00:39:35.000 How are we going to gloss over this?

00:39:37.000 Look at this.

00:39:37.000 You just want to fool them?

00:39:39.000 Just show it.

00:39:40.000 Just show it.

00:39:41.000 Right behind him!

00:39:41.000 Look at that!

00:39:43.000 Harris.

00:39:43.000 Look at that!

00:39:44.000 Vote 24 Harris!

00:39:45.000 Like, this guy's obviously in the bag!

00:39:46.000 No, no, no, no, no, no.

00:39:47.000 He's not saying, no, Donald Trump, you can't say that.

00:39:49.000 They don't want you to think UAW.

00:39:50.000 They want you to think American workers.

00:39:52.000 No, it's not.

00:39:53.000 Well, let me just put a bow on this so you can go check out the references.

00:39:58.000 You don't need to.

00:39:59.000 I don't think that you'd believe I'm lying to you about the UAW.

00:40:02.000 It's pretty clear.

00:40:03.000 Yep, take the UAW's economic advice if you want the country to look like Detroit.

00:40:09.000 That's true.

00:40:13.000 So anywhere in the Midwest, like how's that working out for you Midwest?

00:40:17.000 I lived up there in Cleveland.

00:40:18.000 I saw the closed plants.

00:40:20.000 You know what?

00:40:20.000 No, hold on a second.

00:40:21.000 Or, because we'll say that's not fair, you're using a broad example to make a point even though the UAW basically owns Detroit, right?

00:40:27.000 And American Auto Manufacturing.

00:40:28.000 Okay.

00:40:29.000 Support the UAW's economic influence if you want our government to operate comparably to Plymouth.

00:40:38.000 So, since 1990, the UAW has given $40 million to Democrats.

00:40:41.000 About $900,000 to Republicans.

00:40:41.000 $40 million.

00:40:42.000 Call it a million.

00:40:42.000 Round it up.

00:40:42.000 Forty million dollars to Democrats, forty million dollars, about nine hundred thousand

00:40:48.000 to Republicans.

00:40:49.000 Call it a million, round up.

00:40:51.000 Forty million to one million.

00:40:55.000 Now here's the issue too, is the UAW does not represent American auto workers, to be

00:41:02.000 They represent a specific subset of union thugs who have driven American auto manufacturing into the ground.

00:41:09.000 If you compare, actually, for example, the average hourly cost of a UAW worker, it's about $64.

00:41:13.000 Tesla is $45 to $50 an hour.

00:41:17.000 Compare them to Toyota, it's significantly less than that.

00:41:20.000 If you look at the cost for retirees, and again, what happens is they always go on strike, they go on strike, they want more benefits.

00:41:25.000 I'm not saying that only the UAW is responsible for the nosedive that American auto companies have seen, but they are a big part of it.

00:41:33.000 Let's look at General Motors, okay?

00:41:35.000 Each active General Motors employee Basically sponsors 3.2 retirees.

00:41:41.000 So that means there are 3.2 retirees for every active employee with Cadillac Pension Benefits.

00:41:48.000 The company, it covers healthcare, it covers dental.

00:41:52.000 We've actually averaged out, if you go back and watch the video Detroit and Ruins, we averaged out the cost of dental per car with a GM car.

00:41:59.000 Yeah.

00:42:00.000 It's about 5.3 billion dollars for one year if you're looking at these costs with the UAW workers, you're looking at the Cadillac benefits.

00:42:06.000 And I'm not saying that people don't deserve a pension, that people don't deserve some benefits, but it has to be determined by the market.

00:42:13.000 Not by never-ending bailouts.

00:42:14.000 They wouldn't be able to do this.

00:42:16.000 Hey, you know who doesn't have this?

00:42:17.000 Anyone not in the UAW.

00:42:19.000 Why do they matter more than you?

00:42:21.000 Why does the UAW worker matter more than the American worker for Toyota, for example, in Texas?

00:42:26.000 I believe the most American car on the road is the Toyota Corolla as far as American parts, assembly, labor.

00:42:31.000 The result is they need bailout after bailout, they make shitty cars, and then their plants get moved to Mexico.

00:42:40.000 The bailouts are guaranteed if they fail again from a Harris administration because there's nothing that Democrats like more than to bail out giant companies at your expense.

00:42:49.000 You don't work for GM, for Ford, you don't work for the big three, your tax dollars go to pay for the company that should fail in large part because of the UAW and they want to make it seem like it's the working man versus the elites.

00:43:00.000 Alright, I don't know if you actually believe it.

00:43:03.000 You want America to look like Detroit?

00:43:04.000 Listen to the UAW.

00:43:07.000 And by the way, when was it something that you could file a lawsuit over?

00:43:11.000 Or a complaint to the NLRB for somebody who's saying, you cut all these, I can't believe you cut it, that's incredible, these people, if you're in a right-to-work state and people are like, hey, we're gonna go on strike, it's like, well, you mean you're gonna try to shut down my production because you don't like the contract you signed?

00:43:25.000 Yeah.

00:43:26.000 And the job that you begged me for?

00:43:29.000 Go get a job somewhere else. 0.87

00:43:29.000 Right. 0.87

00:43:31.000 You're fired.

00:43:32.000 Right.

00:43:32.000 Bye.

00:43:34.000 We're not back in the 1920s, 30s, 40s, where unions were needed to make sure people weren't chained to their desks.

00:43:39.000 It's not happening anymore.

00:43:39.000 Right.

00:43:40.000 You can just go get another job.

00:43:42.000 They're like, oh, well, that's tough.

00:43:43.000 Yes, freedom is tough.

00:43:45.000 Hey, I'm the backbone of America, okay?

00:43:47.000 I'm taking the screw for this battery and I'm screwing the one, I'm screwing the one that's by the positive part of the battery.

00:43:53.000 You are, huh?

00:43:53.000 Yeah, and Dylan over there, he's suing it, he's suturing it, he's whatever rivets the negative.

00:43:59.000 That's right, and then you're gonna play Domino's for three hours after.

00:44:01.000 I'd like to talk, I got a cigarette break.

00:44:02.000 Those cools aren't gonna smoke themselves. 1.00

00:44:03.000 Come on.

00:44:04.000 I got a 30-minute coming up, so he's gonna take over for me.

00:44:07.000 Yeah, you wouldn't last a day in my union, pal.

00:44:10.000 Don't do that!

00:44:11.000 That's another guy!

00:44:11.000 Don't do that!

00:44:16.000 God.

00:44:16.000 You can't touch that wrench.

00:44:17.000 I'm still acting like they're real.

00:44:20.000 Did you guys hear that?

00:44:22.000 That's the sound of automation!

00:44:24.000 Coming to a plant near you.

00:44:27.000 By the way, let me just say this one thing.

00:44:30.000 Frank Luntz made this point recently and almost seemed like he was befuddled by this.

00:44:35.000 The guy in the toupee with sneakers?

00:44:36.000 The guy that I almost never listen to.

00:44:39.000 He made this point to CNN and he said, look, I'm doing a lot of interviews.

00:44:41.000 I've been doing this since 1989, 1990, and I have never publicly seen, to this degree, Actually, frontline workers saying the management of the autoworkers unions don't represent us.

00:44:54.000 The union bosses, they don't represent us at all.

00:44:56.000 Don't listen to those guys.

00:44:57.000 And the more they go after it, the more they go after Trump, the more he's seeing people go to Trump that actually work the jobs that want to have a better life.

00:45:05.000 Right.

00:45:06.000 The management, they don't, it's not the company management anymore that's a problem, it's the UAW management, it's the union bosses that are the problem, that do not represent, or even, honestly, come on, care about the workers.

00:45:16.000 Yeah, well, come on, you trust Frank?

00:45:19.000 Want that walking hair hat?

00:45:21.000 Show of hands!

00:45:22.000 Show of hands!

00:45:23.000 Yeah, well, I got a place you can put your hand there, buddy.

00:45:25.000 It's on CNN doing it, and they're all like, oh gosh, this is real bad, isn't it?

00:45:29.000 Yeah, well, he's no longer at Fox News.

00:45:30.000 Yeah, well, there's no reason.

00:45:33.000 Kamala's economy.

00:45:34.000 This is something a lot of you asked us to cover this.

00:45:36.000 I know you're worried about it. 0.97

00:45:38.000 Spoiler alert, it's horseshit. 0.97

00:45:41.000 Kamala-nomics? 0.99

00:45:42.000 It's not a thing, and this poll is a sham.

00:45:47.000 Let me put it that way.

00:45:48.000 Not all polls, but this one certainly is, and this is the one that the media is going to be running with.

00:45:53.000 So this comes from the Financial Times and University of Michigan.

00:45:56.000 and they claim Michigan sucks now the poll doesn't even say this to be clear but they

00:46:01.000 claim now that voters have flipped and trust Kamala more than Trump on I know what you're thinking 0.72

00:46:08.000 Pantsuits.

00:46:09.000 No, the economy.

00:46:10.000 And a new poll by the Financial Times and the University of Michigan Ross Business School shows Americans Trust VP Kamala Harris more on the economy than former President Donald Trump.

00:46:22.000 But the numbers are tied.

00:46:23.000 Okay, just like the pantsuits.

00:46:25.000 That's not real.

00:46:27.000 Everything that guy just said is bull... And I'll show you why, but ask yourself.

00:46:32.000 Comment below.

00:46:32.000 Don't cheat.

00:46:33.000 Why do you think there'd be a sudden surge of trust?

00:46:36.000 Kamala Harris on the economy.

00:46:38.000 Let's break it down with this week's installment of Poll Watchers.

00:46:52.000 A little risque.

00:46:54.000 You mean compared to a drag show at a library?

00:46:54.000 For you, I guess.

00:46:58.000 We'll change that a little.

00:46:59.000 That's not even borderline burlesque!

00:47:02.000 We tried to find the most tame version we could!

00:47:05.000 I'm gonna play it again later.

00:47:08.000 Stop it! 0.99

00:47:10.000 So this poll.

00:47:10.000 Here's why this poll is complete.

00:47:12.000 This poll that comes from the Financial Times, University of Michigan.

00:47:16.000 It sampled a thousand and one registered voters.

00:47:19.000 Okay, Democrats sampled were 45% to Republicans 41%.

00:47:22.000 Now, right away, before people who may not know how polls function, you may say, like, oh, that's four points higher for Democrats.

00:47:28.000 Yeah, but that's actually not what's most severe here.

00:47:32.000 The poll dramatically over-surveyed strong Democrats.

00:47:36.000 They had strong Democrats 25% to 21%.

00:47:39.000 That is not in line with other polls if you look at the crosstabs.

00:47:42.000 So, there is, just to start off with, A slight oversampling of Democrats and a significant oversampling of strong Democrats, which makes the answers, to be clear, where people actually trust Trump more than Kamala Harris on the economy, according to this poll, that much more meaningful.

00:48:01.000 And I know the general public, when they say, hold on, they approve Kamala more than Trump, is thinking the same thing. 0.99

00:48:08.000 Are you out of your f***ing mind? 0.97

00:48:12.000 Yeah, and for comparison, by the way, even I'll bring this up from CNBC's latest poll, which is not known for being unbiased. 0.99

00:48:18.000 They have strong Democrat 22%, strong Republican 23%.

00:48:21.000 So typically speaking, if they have it weighted in Democrats' favor, then they'll have more strong Republicans or vice versa.

00:48:27.000 In this case, both of them!

00:48:30.000 Are leaning towards strong Democrat and Democrats overall.

00:48:32.000 So am I reading that correctly?

00:48:33.000 That CNBC poll actually favors Trump on the economy 2 to 1?

00:48:36.000 Jeez!

00:48:36.000 2 to 1.

00:48:38.000 Yes.

00:48:38.000 So let me read you the question here.

00:48:40.000 This is the leading question with the poll, okay?

00:48:43.000 Well first let me read you the headlines.

00:48:44.000 Financial Times are saying that Kamala Harris is more trusted than Donald Trump on the U.S.

00:48:47.000 CNN was saying it too.

00:48:47.000 economy.

00:48:48.000 You're seeing this all across the media.

00:48:50.000 She's more trusted.

00:48:51.000 Whatever.

00:48:51.000 Okay.

00:48:51.000 Here's the actual question in the poll.

00:48:53.000 The first question.

00:48:53.000 Then I'll give you the follow-up two questions.

00:48:54.000 This is where they get that she's more trusted.

00:48:56.000 Yes.

00:48:56.000 This is where they get that she is more trusted.

00:48:58.000 Regardless of your opinion of these candidates overall, or how you would vote for president, who do you trust most to handle the economy?

00:49:06.000 So it's a wordy question.

00:49:07.000 A little leading.

00:49:08.000 A little leading.

00:49:09.000 Kamala 42, Trump 41.

00:49:12.000 That's well within the margin of error.

00:49:14.000 Yeah.

00:49:15.000 Here are the very next two questions in this same poll and the results.

00:49:20.000 Go check the references in the link.

00:49:22.000 Don't take my word for it.

00:49:24.000 If Donald Trump wins the presidential election in 2024, do you, his economic policies is what they wrote, but do you think his economic policies will leave you financially?

00:49:35.000 Option A, better off, 42%.

00:49:38.000 Worse off, 40%.

00:49:39.000 So that's a net plus 2% saying I think that Donald Trump's policies would leave me better off.

00:49:45.000 Next question.

00:49:46.000 If Kamala Harris wins the presidential election in 2024, do you think her economic policies will leave you financially better off?

00:49:53.000 33%.

00:49:54.000 Worse off?

00:49:54.000 38%.

00:49:54.000 That's a net negative of 5.

00:49:56.000 38 percent. That's a net negative of five. That's a minus five. Plus two for Trump, you'll...

00:50:03.000 People answered.

00:50:04.000 This poll weighed towards Democrats.

00:50:06.000 It's almost a marvel that this happened.

00:50:08.000 Said, yeah, I probably think I'd be better off under Donald Trump.

00:50:11.000 Yeah, I probably think I would be worse off under Kamala Harris financially.

00:50:15.000 This is the exact same poll.

00:50:17.000 Please do not just buy the headlines.

00:50:19.000 He's beating her by nine points on the better off.

00:50:23.000 Nine points!

00:50:24.000 In this poll that they're citing!

00:50:25.000 On just the margins, he's beating her by seven points.

00:50:27.000 He's plus two, she's negative five. 0.97

00:50:30.000 This is the problem with polling right now.

00:50:32.000 You have that one thing, boom, they grab the headline, 42-41.

00:50:35.000 You get into the sampling, that's a big issue.

00:50:37.000 But these questions, questions in polls can lead voters astray.

00:50:41.000 In the same poll to have that kind of spread and go, how are people doing 42-41?

00:50:45.000 There's no way!

00:50:48.000 Look at who they're asking and how they're asking.

00:50:50.000 And by the way, this poll is under this umbrella Global Strategy Group, GSG.

00:50:55.000 It's one of the largest Democrat survey firms in the country.

00:50:59.000 And in 2020, they were actually part of this group that acknowledged polling was awful.

00:51:04.000 They predicted a Biden blowout.

00:51:07.000 A blowout that didn't happen, and even worse when you look at specific states. 0.99

00:51:10.000 According to one of the pollsters involved, they said 2020 was an oh shit moment for all of us. 0.82

00:51:17.000 So just to be clear, this is a poll that is oversampling Democrats, oversampling strong Democrats, and the two follow-up questions, you now have two clear-cut examples, show that more Americans believe that Donald Trump's financial policies will leave them better off, more Americans believe in this poll, meaning more Democrats believe that Kamala Harris's financial policies will leave them worse off financially. 0.94

00:51:40.000 It couldn't be more clear.

00:51:41.000 They're lying about it.

00:51:42.000 Maybe it's one of those fake news headlines that Kamala Harris bought on Google and wasn't portrayed as a sponsored ad. 0.68

00:51:48.000 I don't know.

00:51:49.000 Are you starting to get the picture?

00:51:50.000 This is enough.

00:51:51.000 This is enough for that steal, by the way.

00:51:53.000 This is enough.

00:51:54.000 They are trying to steal this election.

00:51:55.000 Have no problem.

00:51:56.000 I don't care.

00:51:57.000 YouTube, hey, we're not talking about the ghost of Chavez and Dominion voting machines.

00:52:02.000 This is stealing an election because you are robbing American citizens of the information they need to make an informed vote.

00:52:09.000 That's my opinion.

00:52:10.000 You can click that button, by the way, if you want to help support us leading into the election night, the election livestream of the century.

00:52:15.000 We have been strengthening the servers because we know a lot of you are tuning in.

00:52:19.000 And here's the thing, though.

00:52:21.000 There is also some good news to contrast this.

00:52:24.000 So that's fake news.

00:52:25.000 There's fake news and there's some good news.

00:52:27.000 In July 2024...

Louder with Crowder - August 14, 2024

20240814_Wed_okgS_-yo7nY

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript