Louder with Crowder - August 11, 2017


#211 SJWs NOW DENY SCIENCE! Stefan Molyneux and Roaming Millennial | Louder With Crowder


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 15 minutes

Words per Minute

198.77475

Word Count

15,034

Sentence Count

1,299

Misogynist Sentences

38

Hate Speech Sentences

66


Summary

Stefan Molyneux and Roman Millennial join me to talk about the left's recent anti-facts tirades, the FBI raid on Paul Managans, and the latest on the Black Lives Matter movement. We also have a wine review from Gerald Morgan Jr. and the wine of the day from Lotta Malbec.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 - Guys, sorry I'm late. - No problem, no problem. - Today's Molyneux and Millennial, right?
00:00:09.000 Yeah, should be a good show.
00:00:10.000 Yeah, really good show today.
00:00:11.000 We're good.
00:00:39.000 Back up in your with the resurrection.
00:00:41.000 Is the group harder than any that shows no affection?
00:00:45.000 They want a man of some capital here.
00:00:47.000 Because it's time to stop.
00:00:49.000 All along it was a ghetto.
00:00:51.000 Nothing but the ghetto.
00:00:52.000 Taking short steps one foot at a time and get my head low.
00:00:55.000 And never let go.
00:00:57.000 Because if I let go, then I'll be fine unless I'm going insane.
00:01:00.000 I'm in my mind, yes.
00:01:01.000 Goes out of control and touch on subjects that you read about.
00:01:04.000 I touch on the they be leaving out.
00:01:06.000 I've seen this because now I'm smoking.
00:01:09.000 I've seen this.
00:01:09.000 I bet you will too.
00:01:11.000 Because it's time.
00:01:12.000 Time.
00:01:13.000 Feel full.
00:01:15.000 Time. Feel full.
00:01:17.000 Time.
00:01:18.000 Time. Time. Feel full.
00:01:23.000 Time.
00:01:23.000 Time. Kill.
00:01:26.000 Time. Time. Feel full.
00:01:28.000 Time.
00:01:29.000 Time.
00:01:30.000 I think it's coming to water, man.
00:01:35.000 It's coming to water.
00:01:36.000 Oh.
00:01:37.000 It's on a killer spree again.
00:01:39.000 We're guillotine for men.
00:01:41.000 I walk around town with a frown on my face.
00:01:44.000 The whole world gonna get to murder case.
00:01:46.000 The murder rate.
00:01:47.000 Make it crease if you're caught up in the world while it's dying.
00:01:51.000 I guarantee you front, because I am.
00:01:53.000 On the verge of knocking the f***ers out for no reason.
00:01:56.000 Once I get down, there'll be no breathing.
00:01:58.000 It's secret.
00:01:59.000 Just wanna calm down, put his palm down.
00:02:02.000 Seems like I still lay the law down.
00:02:03.000 Now it's alright.
00:02:04.000 What you wanna do?
00:02:05.000 I'm asking you.
00:02:06.000 Stop.
00:02:41.000 That's called the over-under because you get a better grip on deadlifting.
00:02:49.000 He knows that.
00:02:49.000 He was an athlete at Notre Dame.
00:02:51.000 Producing with me in video studio, as always, is Jared, who is not gay, on today, the free show.
00:02:55.000 So if you're watching this on the YouTube, you're not a Mug Club member, you can leave your comments or subscribe because it don't cost nothing.
00:03:01.000 You can follow him at NotGayJarred, me at S. Crowder on Twitter, or again, in the YouTube comments section, or you can send your hate mail.
00:03:07.000 I fulfill my legal obligations, dry iron conclusions.
00:03:09.000 Are we good, Jared?
00:03:10.000 I mostly get hate mail.
00:03:11.000 Hey!
00:03:12.000 At Gerald Morgan Jr.
00:03:13.000 At G Morgan Jr.
00:03:14.000 on Twitter.
00:03:14.000 What's the wine of the day, Gerald?
00:03:15.000 We got Lotta Malbec from Washington State.
00:03:18.000 Sounds like Lotta Man you want to hold at midnight.
00:03:21.000 Great show.
00:03:22.000 Great show today.
00:03:23.000 We have Stefan Molyneux.
00:03:24.000 Every time.
00:03:24.000 Huge.
00:03:25.000 And we have Roman Millennial.
00:03:26.000 Roman Millennial.
00:03:27.000 Both of them on the program today.
00:03:29.000 And we have a lot of news to get to.
00:03:30.000 We also have today's sort of meat segment.
00:03:34.000 I guess people have been saying, you know, you kind of hit one segment often, which we appreciate.
00:03:38.000 That's a little more in-depth as opposed to just hitting news, which thank you.
00:03:41.000 Thank you, person who I just made up.
00:03:44.000 But today we'll talk about the left and their recent anti-science tirades.
00:03:51.000 Because that kind of wraps up this whole week.
00:03:53.000 It was a weird week.
00:03:54.000 We had a Google diversity issue, then North Korea.
00:03:56.000 It was almost refreshing to get away from Trump-Russia until I got really sick of the Google North Korea stuff.
00:04:03.000 Trust me.
00:04:04.000 If that slows down, coming up next week, it's going to be Trump-Russia again.
00:04:08.000 They're really fixating on stuff right now.
00:04:09.000 Well, the FBI did raid Paul Manafort.
00:04:10.000 Oh, they did.
00:04:11.000 Yeah, they did, yeah.
00:04:11.000 That was refreshing.
00:04:12.000 So that happened.
00:04:13.000 Glad they did that.
00:04:14.000 Got to bring it back to some familiar ground.
00:04:15.000 Yep, yep.
00:04:16.000 Good old Paul Manafort.
00:04:17.000 All right, in other news, FaceApp is under fire.
00:04:20.000 Well, again, this time for their ethnic filters that can make you look black, Asian, Hispanic.
00:04:26.000 What could have possibly gone wrong?
00:04:27.000 I don't know.
00:04:28.000 I mean, I don't think...
00:04:29.000 I'm not one to be offended or outraged, but I don't know how they didn't see this coming.
00:04:34.000 I'm pretty sure it's a bunch of Russians up there.
00:04:36.000 I'm pretty sure that's people who make it.
00:04:37.000 Show that again.
00:04:39.000 Legitimately, yep.
00:04:40.000 They actually released it, so you can do...
00:04:41.000 It's pretty good.
00:04:42.000 The President Trump Asian is very believable.
00:04:45.000 Below that, it looks like a Pepe Clarence Thomas.
00:04:47.000 I don't know what it is, but...
00:04:48.000 The black Trump, it looks like he's had better days.
00:04:50.000 Yeah, it looks like he's had better days.
00:04:52.000 And of course, people were outraged.
00:04:54.000 There are people who are professionally outraged.
00:04:56.000 And a lot of people were actually particularly outraged that white people are now able to get scholarships again.
00:05:00.000 So that was something that really...
00:05:01.000 But some of their anger was quelled when they found out that it makes them louder in movie theaters.
00:05:07.000 so.
00:05:08.000 Oh, man.
00:05:09.000 And a lot of people thought they were hacked.
00:05:13.000 This was news all over social media.
00:05:14.000 Yeah, it's true.
00:05:15.000 Because it went down.
00:05:15.000 Actually, what happened was their servers were crashed when a flood of Chinese men started taking hopeful pictures of their penises.
00:05:21.000 And black guys took pictures of their FICO scores.
00:05:25.000 I didn't know they had those filters.
00:05:27.000 Is that underneath the other section there?
00:05:28.000 Yeah, it just changes your life.
00:05:31.000 Especially when everything, all your online applications, they're all digital now.
00:05:34.000 I wish I would have known.
00:05:35.000 Yeah, I love how the presumption is that it's bad to be one of these ethnicities, though.
00:05:39.000 I mean, they make it seem like, do black people not know what they look like?
00:05:45.000 Are they unaware?
00:05:46.000 Well, I don't necessarily know what their standards are.
00:05:50.000 If it's a skin tone thing, fine, but I think they've picked some features which might be considered...
00:05:54.000 Maybe they don't have mirrors in China.
00:05:55.000 I don't know.
00:05:57.000 Isn't this where they have the giant tongues with the dogs?
00:06:00.000 That's Snapchat.
00:06:01.000 That's okay, though.
00:06:04.000 Moving on, things that are offensive.
00:06:05.000 Chelsea Manning is now on the cover of Vogue magazine, so we got...
00:06:11.000 Let's just move on like this is going really well.
00:06:13.000 Walmart is taking heat for a back-to-school sign.
00:06:17.000 And this is...
00:06:17.000 It was one of those issues...
00:06:18.000 So you read this headline?
00:06:19.000 Yeah.
00:06:20.000 Bring that back up so I can...
00:06:21.000 Walmart markets guns as back-to-school items.
00:06:23.000 I thought, okay, that's fake news.
00:06:24.000 It's glorified.
00:06:25.000 No, it's actually worse if you take it in context.
00:06:27.000 Look at that display.
00:06:29.000 That display is there.
00:06:31.000 It's not like an accidental sign.
00:06:33.000 No, be the hero.
00:06:34.000 No.
00:06:35.000 Which is why at first it would have seemed like, okay, you see a clear-cut case maybe of employee negligence.
00:06:39.000 Yeah.
00:06:39.000 But...
00:06:40.000 It's pretty apparent that's not the case when you see pictures surfacing of their anti-bullying campaign for back to school.
00:06:47.000 It seems like they're going with a theme.
00:06:50.000 Yeah.
00:06:51.000 I don't know how you get it that off, Walmart.
00:06:54.000 I don't know either.
00:06:55.000 Twice now.
00:06:56.000 You can get a rifle in a backpack anyway.
00:06:57.000 It's all the time.
00:07:00.000 Sorry, Steven, just a second.
00:07:01.000 Sorry.
00:07:02.000 Dean, hey.
00:07:03.000 And the cat's in the cradle and the silver spoon.
00:07:07.000 Little boy Jared is sitting on the moon.
00:07:10.000 When you're coming home, when you're coming out, Jared, don't know when.
00:07:15.000 We'll get together then, J-Rod.
00:07:18.000 You know we'll have a good time then.
00:07:20.000 No.
00:07:23.000 At some point it's just sad.
00:07:24.000 Yeah, it is.
00:07:25.000 Associated Press, AP. They wrote this article.
00:07:28.000 How to know if your child is transgender.
00:07:30.000 What experts say.
00:07:33.000 I gotta hear this.
00:07:34.000 That's a real article that was written from AP. Jeez.
00:07:38.000 And it prompted a follow-up article directed to children.
00:07:41.000 How to tell if you should switch your parents.
00:07:43.000 I'd read that.
00:07:44.000 That's better.
00:07:45.000 It's so bad.
00:07:46.000 Terrible.
00:07:46.000 First question is, are they asking you if you're a tranny when you're wanting to play with firetrucks?
00:07:52.000 Oh my gosh.
00:07:53.000 How desperate are these SJW parents to have screwed up children?
00:07:57.000 You gotta wonder at some point.
00:07:59.000 Yeah, I do think.
00:07:59.000 I want an LGBTQAI5. It's so bad.
00:08:03.000 Because you see that a lot.
00:08:05.000 You think it's an exaggeration.
00:08:07.000 People used to say we were strawmanning when we said LGBTQAIP. Someone sent us a picture.
00:08:11.000 I don't know who it was on Twitter.
00:08:13.000 Tweet it back to me at S. Crowder because I was looking for it.
00:08:15.000 I couldn't find it.
00:08:16.000 It had the number 2 in it.
00:08:17.000 What?
00:08:18.000 It had, I swear to you, the number two in the LGBTQA acronym.
00:08:24.000 It did.
00:08:25.000 These people, these parents are treating it like catching Pokemon.
00:08:28.000 But like, if your Pokemon superpower is like unemployment and suicide.
00:08:35.000 Gotta get the LGBTQAIP. If you get the P, that's...
00:08:40.000 Gotta catch them, gotta catch them all.
00:08:42.000 Put him in the Marines.
00:08:43.000 All right.
00:08:45.000 Oh, gosh.
00:08:47.000 Oh, my gosh.
00:08:50.000 Great lead-in for Stefan.
00:08:52.000 Terrible.
00:08:53.000 All right.
00:08:53.000 I'm in human fears.
00:08:54.000 Human shields.
00:08:55.000 Oh, sorry.
00:08:56.000 Fears.
00:08:57.000 These were human fears of being replaced by automation.
00:09:00.000 And we've talked about this.
00:09:01.000 There's an ongoing problem.
00:09:02.000 This is where President Donald Trump says he's going to bring a lot of jobs back.
00:09:05.000 Some of them can't be brought back because of automation.
00:09:07.000 But over these fears, South Korea could be the first country to implement a robot tax.
00:09:13.000 Oh.
00:09:13.000 Oh, boy.
00:09:14.000 They claim it's going to offset unemployment and channel revenue toward welfare programs.
00:09:19.000 Have you been reading about this?
00:09:20.000 I've been reading about this.
00:09:21.000 Why don't they just let the employers create more jobs?
00:09:24.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:09:25.000 No, what is tax them to death?
00:09:27.000 We know what's best.
00:09:27.000 Well, Bill Gates proposed this not long ago.
00:09:29.000 Yeah, it's true.
00:09:30.000 Yeah, I think it was something about if a robot replaces an employee.
00:09:35.000 If they make $50,000, then we should tax the robot as if it was a person, whatever the normal tax would be for an employee who makes $50,000.
00:09:43.000 Do you ever just wonder if late-life Bill Gates could go back to early-life Bill Gates if they'd support the same thing?
00:09:48.000 Do you think early Bill Gates would want a $50,000 robot tax?
00:09:52.000 Small-business Bill Gates would be like, this sucks.
00:09:54.000 This really sucks, but big-business Bill Gates goes, I can deal with a red tape.
00:09:57.000 Shut him down!
00:09:59.000 We give away enough free Windows 95.
00:10:02.000 What the hell's the difference at this point?
00:10:04.000 Only the best.
00:10:07.000 So, robot tax.
00:10:08.000 This is what they're going to be taxing, robots.
00:10:10.000 In a sign of citizen protest, all the robots of South Korea dumped their soju into the Sea of Japan.
00:10:18.000 Will not stand.
00:10:19.000 Now, for those who don't know, people are asking.
00:10:21.000 We don't have details.
00:10:21.000 While the rates are not official, the suggestions for the taxes are a 4% tax rate for jobs lost to automation, 3% for carbon emissions, and then a 2% tax for the guys who keep getting their dicks caught in the robot sex dolls.
00:10:39.000 There need to be protections for those robots.
00:10:41.000 They really do.
00:10:41.000 I do not think that that is an actual robot sex doll that sells very well.
00:10:46.000 No.
00:10:47.000 You know, I say that, but I bet you if you saw a headphone jack and thought it was an outfit.
00:10:53.000 If you go to the wrong corner of Comic-Con, I bet you that's not too far off.
00:10:57.000 It's probably that far off at all.
00:10:59.000 There's Tokyo Comic Cons.
00:11:01.000 Right next to Tranny Pikachu.
00:11:03.000 Jumping into a Pokeball.
00:11:05.000 What's going on here?
00:11:06.000 That's a South Korean one.
00:11:08.000 We also have a Walking Dead panel.
00:11:12.000 You want to go see that?
00:11:12.000 No, I think I want to stay with the R2-D2 guy.
00:11:15.000 Alright.
00:11:17.000 So...
00:11:18.000 It's been a through line.
00:11:19.000 We'll talk about this with Roman Milano.
00:11:21.000 We'll talk about it with Stefan.
00:11:22.000 Stefan spoke with DeMory, actually, the guy who released the Google memo.
00:11:27.000 The Anti-Diversity Manifesto.
00:11:30.000 But there's been a really important through line, I think, this week.
00:11:34.000 And so we can go back to that.
00:11:36.000 That was a memo released about the biological differences between men and women.
00:11:39.000 This was released at Google.
00:11:40.000 If you haven't, we have a ton of videos on it.
00:11:42.000 But Marley was dead to begin with.
00:11:44.000 Okay?
00:11:45.000 That happened, and then there was outrage this week.
00:11:47.000 Britain's youngest transgender changed his, her gender for the third time.
00:11:51.000 And so what happened when people said, hey, you know what, maybe we need to revisit this.
00:11:55.000 Maybe there's something going on.
00:11:56.000 Hate speech, of course, right?
00:11:57.000 This has been the...
00:11:58.000 So we have Google, hate speech, this, criticism of the guy who changed...
00:12:03.000 I don't even...
00:12:03.000 I don't know at this point, guy or girl, you can let me know.
00:12:06.000 It...
00:12:06.000 And then there's an article from Slate, and you tell me, because the term anti-science has been thrown around by the left so often, it's lost all meaning.
00:12:14.000 So you tell me if this could be misinterpreted that way from Slate, titled Stop Equating Science with Truth.
00:12:24.000 So, I'll leave the choice to you!
00:12:27.000 You're a scientist!
00:12:29.000 That sounds like a straw man, Steven.
00:12:31.000 I don't know about that one.
00:12:32.000 You know, the left is trying to have a corner on the right being anti-science.
00:12:35.000 For a long time.
00:12:37.000 For a long time.
00:12:37.000 The right just is anti-science.
00:12:39.000 You know, these are regressive.
00:12:40.000 These are people who believe that the Earth was created in seven days, and they don't believe that, you know, Florida's gone yet from climate change.
00:12:46.000 So they've, you know, they've straw-manned conservatives as being anti-science for a long time.
00:12:50.000 And it is interesting, we talk about sort of cultural shifts in the pendulum swinging.
00:12:53.000 It's swinging so quickly right now.
00:12:56.000 We were saying for a while, remember, we were saying, actually, I think the left is the wing, the umbrella of the anti-science party.
00:13:03.000 Yeah.
00:13:03.000 And people said, well, no, that's just hyperbolic.
00:13:06.000 This was maybe a year ago, two years ago?
00:13:08.000 Yeah.
00:13:08.000 And now they're creating articles.
00:13:10.000 They're writing at Slate that we shouldn't consider science truth.
00:13:14.000 And they based it off of a bunch of straw men.
00:13:16.000 So let me read some quotes from this article.
00:13:18.000 She actually writes, It's 2017 and people are still debating, in reference to the Google memo, whether or not women are intellectually inferior to men and whether we are entitled to a workplace that isn't toxic to people simply based on their gender and sex.
00:13:31.000 Let us out Slate.
00:13:31.000 Gender and sex.
00:13:32.000 Come on now.
00:13:33.000 Gender, you mean sex.
00:13:34.000 No.
00:13:35.000 So...
00:13:37.000 Here's how you know you're about to read a great scientific article.
00:13:40.000 When she references a memo and says that things were in the memo that weren't in the memo.
00:13:46.000 The memo said this, but I read it.
00:13:49.000 It didn't say that.
00:13:50.000 You're anti-science.
00:13:51.000 No, let's continue because I think I can make a case here.
00:13:53.000 She goes on to say, it's 2017 and to some extent scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view that ranks a man's intellect above a woman's.
00:14:03.000 Again, this is using the Google memo as a jumping off point.
00:14:06.000 First off, He never argued that.
00:14:08.000 No.
00:14:09.000 It literally never happened.
00:14:12.000 Do you mean figuratively?
00:14:14.000 No, literally.
00:14:14.000 Literally never happened.
00:14:15.000 It never occurred.
00:14:16.000 Now...
00:14:17.000 If you want to get into that discussion about intellect, we've talked about the bell curve and how men tend to occupy both sides of the bell.
00:14:23.000 That's why overall IQ is higher for men, but it's not necessarily a fair representation.
00:14:27.000 But men and women are definitely designed differently intellectually.
00:14:31.000 That's another thing, too, that we see all the time from the left, right?
00:14:33.000 Men and women are exactly the same.
00:14:35.000 A man can do anything a woman can do, and a woman can do anything a man can do.
00:14:37.000 They are entirely interchangeable.
00:14:39.000 Don't you say any different.
00:14:40.000 Okay.
00:14:40.000 By the way, celebrate diversity.
00:14:42.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:14:43.000 But if we do want to have that argument, chess.
00:14:45.000 Chess.
00:14:46.000 There's a women's division in World Chess Championship.
00:14:49.000 They can enter the men's division.
00:14:51.000 I mean, like if you look at the top global rankings of all time, it's insignificant.
00:14:56.000 They barely crack it.
00:14:57.000 And then there's a women's only division.
00:14:59.000 Because we're wired differently.
00:14:59.000 Why?
00:15:01.000 But let's continue to see if this gets to some more scientific reputation.
00:15:07.000 There's time to salvage it.
00:15:07.000 There's time to salvage it.
00:15:07.000 She goes on to write, racial taxonomies conveniently confirmed that enslaving African-American people, sorry, that enslaving African, this was before they were African-American.
00:15:16.000 Yeah, I don't know.
00:15:16.000 Are they back to being African-American?
00:15:17.000 Which, by the way, was kind of bad.
00:15:18.000 It was bad.
00:15:18.000 It was a screw job.
00:15:19.000 It was, yeah.
00:15:20.000 Was a perfectly reasonable behavior since, as Thomas Jefferson put it, black people were inferior to the whites in the endowments of body and mind.
00:15:28.000 Funny enough, this is the exact same argument this woman and feminists like her use when they justify killing unborn babies.
00:15:33.000 So it's not that far.
00:15:35.000 We haven't changed so much.
00:15:37.000 Now, she's using these straw men, first off, to vilify, because it's been all hands on deck, to vilify the Google Memo employee guy.
00:15:44.000 Okay?
00:15:45.000 And she's using it to try and shut down dialogue coming from the right, because now the right kind of has a corner on science and on biological arguments, as you see in the realm of cultural arguments.
00:15:56.000 And so what are they trying to say?
00:15:57.000 Just like they tried to say before, this is hate speech, now it's, well, hold on a second, science can maybe be hate speech.
00:16:05.000 Hold on a second.
00:16:06.000 I thought science was...
00:16:06.000 No!
00:16:07.000 No!
00:16:08.000 Because I wrote it at Slate.
00:16:10.000 So here's...
00:16:11.000 We did some digging into this writer.
00:16:13.000 And here's just...
00:16:14.000 You know, I don't...
00:16:15.000 And it might be like those Native Americans who are on their Native American reservations, you know, but then they wear Levi's.
00:16:21.000 The white man makes me live like this.
00:16:22.000 No, they don't.
00:16:24.000 You chose to wear the Levi's, okay?
00:16:28.000 So here's some history on her.
00:16:31.000 Out of this woman's references, 100% are white and 80% are male.
00:16:37.000 She shows exclusively male advisors throughout her entire education.
00:16:42.000 The undergraduates that she co-supervised have been 66% male.
00:16:47.000 And by the way, just in case you're wondering regarding critical thinking, this isn't just ad hominem for no reason.
00:16:53.000 It's because this person is actually trying to alter the course of scientific conversation in the culture.
00:16:59.000 She was actually duped by Ahmed the Clock Boy.
00:17:02.000 She invited him to MIT. Oh, no.
00:17:04.000 So this is the woman who's now making the argument regarding science.
00:17:07.000 That's it.
00:17:07.000 I'm done with her.
00:17:09.000 And this is important.
00:17:10.000 I know you're just going to say this is ad-hom.
00:17:11.000 No, the article, we've refuted it a lot with Crowder.com.
00:17:15.000 But personally, okay, this is why, because Daily Wire wrote about this.
00:17:20.000 She claimed she was gay in 2008.
00:17:21.000 She married a woman that year, okay?
00:17:22.000 But then she divorced her and married a man in 2013.
00:17:28.000 So, in her article, she also goes on, I'm just trying to add this all up, she argues that a hint of irony, that science, okay, science, which is not necessarily truth, has caused a dangerously warm planet.
00:17:42.000 Makes perfect sense.
00:17:43.000 How'd you figure that one out?
00:17:45.000 Which method was that?
00:17:48.000 The lapsed lesbian now married to a man method?
00:17:51.000 What is it?
00:17:53.000 And see, that's what Daily Wire wrote about that, how often lesbian women end up having more sex with men than straight women and getting pregnant more often.
00:18:00.000 But if people argue that, in many instances, that lesbianism is more a byproduct of nurture than nature.
00:18:06.000 We've talked about how homosexuality in men you've seen throughout history, but lesbianism, at the rate that it is, certainly seems to be more of a byproduct of nurture.
00:18:14.000 Sociological, not biological.
00:18:15.000 That's hate speech.
00:18:16.000 The nature part is what you can see in the mirror, generally speaking.
00:18:19.000 Stop it.
00:18:21.000 It's hate speech because science.
00:18:23.000 So if we argue that men, as in Google, if we argue that men and women are biologically different, that's hate speech.
00:18:28.000 Why?
00:18:29.000 Because science.
00:18:30.000 There's no safe ground for me.
00:18:31.000 If we argue that it's impossible to biologically change your sex or your gender, that's hate speech.
00:18:38.000 If we argue that, unlike the previous statements I just made, which are scientifically observable, both past and present, that climate change doomsday alarmists are basing economy-crippling policy on less than entirely reliable climate prediction models, and maybe we should just slow down a little bit, well, that's...
00:18:54.000 Heretical speech.
00:18:55.000 Because science.
00:18:56.000 So we've switched it.
00:18:57.000 It's hate speech, and then it's...
00:19:00.000 But when it comes to...
00:19:01.000 You're a heretic.
00:19:03.000 It is entirely about convenience.
00:19:05.000 And Neil deGrasse Tyson was talking about this on Bill Maher.
00:19:08.000 They can't keep their own arguments straight.
00:19:10.000 He's talked about the beauty that science was self-correcting.
00:19:13.000 That science was the pursuit of truth.
00:19:15.000 That needs to be a manual.
00:19:16.000 Now, I don't believe that science necessarily is always—I certainly believe that science can be politically motivated, especially if you look in the realm of grants, if you look in the realm of scholarships, you look in the realm of where people are going to get federal funding, to get national funding.
00:19:30.000 Yeah, of course, that can dictate sometimes—and you would maybe say it, people who are watching in the comments section, Big Oil.
00:19:35.000 You know we're paid by them.
00:19:36.000 We're paid by the Koch brothers, Big Oil, and Big Pharma, apparently.
00:19:38.000 So that dictates our science.
00:19:40.000 Yeah, it does.
00:19:41.000 We will have zero scientific findings that don't support BP personally.
00:19:46.000 I actually flew here today, by the way.
00:19:47.000 Yeah, I want to see seagulls in the Gulf covered in Crisco.
00:19:53.000 Typically, yeah.
00:19:54.000 Because I don't give a sh**.
00:19:56.000 So, they cannot keep their arguments straight.
00:20:00.000 And this is where we are seeing the left collapse under its own weight.
00:20:03.000 We're seeing it with Google.
00:20:04.000 When you look at Google, we'll talk about this with Stefan Molyneux, we have to get going, where 50% of people at Google actually didn't think this was all that offensive.
00:20:11.000 But they don't want to speak out about it.
00:20:14.000 When you look at people actually just at large, if you say, hey, what if I tell you biologically men and women are different?
00:20:19.000 Most people agree it's not offensive.
00:20:21.000 When you look at people in general, if you say, hey, do you think that you can biologically change your sex?
00:20:25.000 Most people don't think so.
00:20:27.000 Now, most people, and they tend to be right because so do most scientists, but it doesn't matter.
00:20:31.000 Science doesn't matter in this instance, not because of funding, not because of grants, not because of the scientific method, which is what we talk about as conservatives, that grants and funding can obviously alter the course of the scientific method.
00:20:43.000 They argue that science doesn't equate truth because it could be offensive.
00:20:48.000 And here's the problem with that is, what is offensive now?
00:20:50.000 And you see this from Slate?
00:20:51.000 What is considered offensive?
00:20:52.000 There used to be a standard.
00:20:54.000 It was something that was deliberately meant to offend or to harm somebody.
00:20:58.000 Now it's just anything that makes somebody feel bad about themselves.
00:21:01.000 We'll talk more about it with Stefan Molyneux coming up after this.
00:21:04.000 We'll talk more about it with Stefan Molyneux.
00:21:34.000 you From the channel of the Young Turks, specifically Anna Kasparian, I don't think you are a single-issue voter.
00:21:49.000 I just think you're dumb.
00:21:53.000 I think you're f***ing dumb.
00:22:00.000 I'm not here, she goes on to specify, I'm not here for a f***ing hobby.
00:22:10.000 Okay?
00:22:14.000 Okay, Anna.
00:22:16.000 Neither are we here for hobbies.
00:22:20.000 In demanding equal statement on the platform.
00:22:25.000 Furthermore, a live old YouTube from a street gang known as Wu-Tang.
00:22:34.000 Shame!
00:22:35.000 Shame!
00:22:38.000 Shame on a n***a who try to run game.
00:22:49.000 On a n**** Who but wrong with the trigger And shame on YouTube For trying to run game
00:23:01.000 On all the n****s Greetings, Lotto of Color Viewers.
00:23:19.000 Hopper here.
00:23:20.000 You may have noticed my new friends.
00:23:24.000 I got him at LottoWithCarterShop.com where you can get your shirt where the socialism is for figs and the firearm shirt and there's some really cool clothes.
00:23:36.000 I have to wait a woman's one because it fits better.
00:23:37.000 All right.
00:23:55.000 I made a wish.
00:23:56.000 And I wish that we would have our next guest back.
00:23:58.000 And here he is.
00:23:59.000 You can follow him on Twitter.
00:24:01.000 You know him over there.
00:24:02.000 But also his YouTube channel is youtube.com slash free domain radio.
00:24:05.000 Because it's not his name.
00:24:06.000 I don't know if someone's sitting on his name.
00:24:07.000 But Stefan Molyneux, how are you, sir?
00:24:09.000 I'm well.
00:24:10.000 How are you doing, man?
00:24:11.000 It looks like a painting behind you, but I assume that's real.
00:24:14.000 You're out in the woods.
00:24:16.000 I am not in the studio at the moment.
00:24:20.000 I am enjoying some of the natural light that brings out my girlish features.
00:24:23.000 So that is, of course, the plan.
00:24:25.000 Yes, yes.
00:24:26.000 Well, actually, light just brings out any bad features in my case.
00:24:29.000 The light raking across my face, all of a sudden Mr.
00:24:32.000 Hyde comes out.
00:24:33.000 But you have a book coming out relatively soon.
00:24:35.000 We'll have you back on for an hour to discuss it.
00:24:36.000 So is this kind of your, are you going out, are you sequestering yourself in the final stages of literature?
00:24:43.000 Yeah.
00:24:43.000 You know, I mean, the end of a book recording, the end of a book production, it's basically like trying to land a helicopter into the side of a mountain blindfolded in cyclones.
00:24:53.000 So, yes, I'm trying to sort of really focus on what needs to get done in the world to finish this up.
00:24:58.000 So, yeah, I'm not in the studio at the moment.
00:25:00.000 You know, it's funny, because Nagy Gerdo used to use it as an excuse.
00:25:03.000 He would say he was finishing his book to go to the Super 8.
00:25:06.000 And then we just found him there with a noose, and it just, it devolved very quickly.
00:25:10.000 So, Stefan, you got an exclusive...
00:25:11.000 Not my best moment.
00:25:12.000 No, well, among many not-so-great moments.
00:25:15.000 You got a scoop with James...
00:25:17.000 Am I pronouncing his last name correctly?
00:25:18.000 Damore?
00:25:19.000 Damore?
00:25:19.000 Yeah, Damore.
00:25:20.000 Damore.
00:25:21.000 I think it's fine, yeah.
00:25:22.000 Damore from Google.
00:25:23.000 The man who actually wrote this anti-diversity manifesto, as the media has called it.
00:25:29.000 Um...
00:25:31.000 What happened there, and why was he so quick to come on your program?
00:25:35.000 Is he a fan?
00:25:37.000 And are there any new developments?
00:25:40.000 I think he just wanted something fair, something that was going to actually go into the ideas.
00:25:46.000 And I can't speak for him, but I would imagine that in his position, he might have some concerns that the mainstream media might seek to sensationalize and reduce the arguments to a bunch of ad hominem.
00:25:56.000 So I think he just wanted...
00:25:58.000 To talk with someone who was going to give the actual intellectual and scientific content of his argument its due respect and airing.
00:26:07.000 And I think he found that the alternative media, or at least me, was probably going to be a better chance that it was going to happen that way.
00:26:14.000 Yeah, and it seems like it's been well-received.
00:26:16.000 I actually saw it in my YouTube trending feed.
00:26:17.000 Like a unicorn.
00:26:19.000 I'm like, it has to be one of those situations where Google was like, if we bury this one, we're in deep crap.
00:26:25.000 We just gotta get it out there.
00:26:27.000 Wait, it was in your trending feed, too?
00:26:28.000 It's in the real trending.
00:26:29.000 See, that would suggest that they told us it was organic algorithms.
00:26:33.000 I would suggest it's curated if it's in mine and yours.
00:26:35.000 No, they said trending is for everybody.
00:26:37.000 Trending is not curated, apparently.
00:26:39.000 That's not what they told us.
00:26:40.000 Sorry.
00:26:41.000 Okay.
00:26:41.000 We're trying to get to the bottom of these Google algorithms.
00:26:44.000 Apparently they maybe have some ladies unfit for tech in charge of them.
00:26:49.000 What's your opinion on this?
00:26:51.000 Because you've been a good communicator on this issue.
00:26:54.000 I think we both agree, listen, when it comes to Facebook, YouTube, it's not about the First Amendment.
00:26:59.000 But when we're talking about freedom of speech, when we're talking about that topic, we're not just talking about government intervention.
00:27:04.000 We are talking also about this idea of self-censorship and specifically companies being dishonest with their censorship practices.
00:27:10.000 This seems as though Google can fire whoever they want, but they're firing him for something they claim that they would never do, for his opinion.
00:27:18.000 Is that kind of what you've been presenting?
00:27:21.000 Is that how James feels, or does he think it's just a wrongful termination period?
00:27:24.000 Well, I think in the interview he said he loves Google, he's very enthusiastic about the mission, and who doesn't want as much information to be available at people's fingertips for them to research and so on?
00:27:37.000 So I think that The concern is that there's so much power in the hands of these companies.
00:27:43.000 You know, like way back in the day, you could pick up the phone, and you could crap about the phone company, and you could talk your politics with your friends, and the phone company didn't do anything.
00:27:51.000 They didn't say, well, we're going to put you on the super crackly line, or we're going to put you on the line which has seals mating in the background so nobody can hear each other.
00:27:59.000 You know, I always tried to find that line.
00:28:00.000 Never, never could.
00:28:01.000 It's on Vonage somewhere.
00:28:03.000 You have to enter a special code.
00:28:04.000 That's right.
00:28:05.000 So I think the idea that we used to just be able to have conversations and not worry about the content and how it would be transmitted or how it would be viewed or how it might be skewed.
00:28:14.000 Now, of course, the amount of power that these companies have, it's very tempting, I think, when you get People who have an agenda in there, and the agenda is not allow for the open discussion of ideas.
00:28:26.000 And I think what is alarming people about this is, okay, this is, you know, Google, I'm sure, has this thing where they say, hey, if you've got great ideas about how to make the company better, we value diversity of opinion, we value diversity of thought, we're a scientific, technical company, we value all of this information, we value this enthusiasm.
00:28:41.000 And he listened, and, you know, like most of us when we were young, he thought, hey, I'm sure that's what they really want when he did it.
00:28:47.000 It's like a puppy bringing back a dead bird.
00:28:49.000 He thought we'd like it.
00:28:50.000 Like, not in the house!
00:28:53.000 I chewed its head off for you so you could get to the juices quicker, right?
00:28:56.000 So he listened, like most of us when we're young, we listen to what people say they want and we think that they're realistic.
00:29:04.000 Right.
00:29:04.000 I want a gentleman.
00:29:07.000 So I think that he, with great enthusiasm, went in and said, you know, I've got a way to make this diversity thing work better.
00:29:13.000 Let's start with the science.
00:29:15.000 Let's design things to leverage Gender strengths and avoid weaknesses and so on.
00:29:20.000 And a lot of this stuff has come out of feminism as well, saying here's how we can balance work and family, here's how we can leverage women's strengths and so on.
00:29:28.000 So he went out and he did this, and I think if you look at the ferocity with which he was dealt with internally, I think people do have a concern that there may not be objectivity in how Google approaches data, and that of course makes people feel nervous about everything else.
00:29:41.000 Yeah, and I do think it's important.
00:29:42.000 We talked about this with Joy Villa, and I think we'll probably talk about it with Roaming Millennial.
00:29:46.000 When the media, it's a perfect example of, my God, when we started the show, people thought CNN was still actual news.
00:29:51.000 When you and I were starting in our den out of Detroit, you did.
00:29:54.000 You were guilty of it, and you were relatively conservative.
00:29:56.000 Naturally, you just weren't as plugged in.
00:29:58.000 But when you see them say, ah.
00:30:00.000 Anti-diversity manifesto says females unfit for tech jobs.
00:30:04.000 It is so clearly a lie by omission because he goes out of his way to stress points as to where women would actually have advantages over men and encourages Google to place more value on these points, like cooperation in the workplace.
00:30:18.000 There are a multitude of factors that he lists there, and we can't list them all, but people can go read the memo.
00:30:23.000 Sorry to interrupt, but I know this kind of guy because I've worked in software.
00:30:28.000 I managed an R&D department and all of that.
00:30:30.000 He had a problem to be solved.
00:30:32.000 He's like, how do we increase the proportion of women in tech jobs?
00:30:37.000 So like any engineer, like any sort of rational, sensible person who maybe doesn't always understand the Eddies and flows of human backlash and interaction.
00:30:46.000 He said, OK, I had a problem to be solved.
00:30:48.000 And according to the diversity training that I take, everybody wants to close this gap, get more women into tech, more women into management.
00:30:53.000 So he says, OK, well, why aren't there a lot?
00:30:56.000 Now, the answer of, well, it's just sexism, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:30:59.000 That's not an answer.
00:31:00.000 It doesn't really solve anything.
00:31:01.000 It just, you know, it castigates and blames.
00:31:03.000 It's a nagging kind of answer.
00:31:04.000 It's a non-answer.
00:31:05.000 So he said, OK, I want to close this gap.
00:31:06.000 I want to get more women into tech.
00:31:07.000 So let's start with the facts.
00:31:09.000 Let's start with the science.
00:31:10.000 And let's try and build an environment, a set of systems that's going to facilitate Google reaching its goal of getting more women into tech.
00:31:17.000 And so what he did was innocently try to solve a problem.
00:31:20.000 Oh, boy.
00:31:22.000 You madman, what are you doing?
00:31:25.000 You're clubbing baby seals by trying to solve a problem rationally.
00:31:28.000 In a lot of ways, he's being excoriated.
00:31:30.000 I know he's an engineer, but excoriated for communicating like a man.
00:31:33.000 Wouldn't it be great if it turns out he's an engineer who's just on the spectrum and that just comes out in a lawsuit?
00:31:38.000 Like, I have autism!
00:31:40.000 It's a guy with Asperger's!
00:31:40.000 Like, oh god no!
00:31:41.000 Come on, look.
00:31:43.000 I would like to think that people could be rational and empirical without being autistic.
00:31:47.000 I know, I know.
00:31:49.000 But here's something that I do think is important, and that's a really good point because we've talked about this.
00:31:53.000 You look at John Oliver, for example, his bid on the Border Patrol, which is really hard for us to rebut because there wasn't a lot of information in there.
00:32:00.000 It was basically a logical fallacy using data up until 2012, not including new data.
00:32:04.000 But he basically says, okay, let's boil it down.
00:32:06.000 He doesn't want a wall.
00:32:08.000 He doesn't like Border Patrol, so he doesn't think more Border Patrol agents will help.
00:32:12.000 He believes in sanctuary cities.
00:32:14.000 There's really no solution there.
00:32:16.000 They're just saying, this is bad, that's bad.
00:32:17.000 It's like the cool kids saying, ha ha ha, you suck, you didn't do well, but they haven't tried anything.
00:32:22.000 Here's a guy, you see this on the right a lot.
00:32:24.000 He's actually offering solutions.
00:32:26.000 He's trying to be productive as opposed to just saying, you're bad, your ideas are bad.
00:32:31.000 It really seemed like an earnest attempt to help Google...
00:32:35.000 Even if that's just opinion, that's how it came across, which to me tells me they don't want a discussion.
00:32:40.000 The same reason that we've had to move our interviews around and you've been incredibly accommodating, not a single leftist would come on this show to discuss it because they don't want to talk about it.
00:32:49.000 Well, first of all, I think John Oliver does have a solution to the solution to the problem of, well, not enough people are voting Democrat, so let's bring a whole bunch of people in from Mexico, 80% plus of whom are going to vote Democrat in the long run, and, of course, the families are going to vote Democrat.
00:33:03.000 So he is trying to solve a problem.
00:33:05.000 It's just not the problem he says he's trying to solve.
00:33:07.000 The problem is, well, the Democrats are out of power.
00:33:09.000 We better get more people in who are going to vote Democrat, and that's the goal.
00:33:13.000 So everybody is trying to solve a problem.
00:33:14.000 Some people are trying to do it on the surface, and some people are trying to do it surreptitiously or kind of under the table.
00:33:19.000 So yeah, this guy wanted to solve a problem.
00:33:21.000 Earnestly, in good faith, using the best scientific data available, he went and tried to solve the problem.
00:33:26.000 And it's sort of like, I don't know, going up to the early church and saying, hey, I've solved the problem.
00:33:31.000 It's not the Earth that's at the center of the solar system, it's the sun.
00:33:34.000 Hey, everyone's going to love me because I finally solved the problem.
00:33:39.000 Why am I in the stocks?
00:33:41.000 Why am I here now?
00:33:42.000 Really, I thought I was helping people.
00:33:44.000 This doesn't make sense at all.
00:33:45.000 Are we reading the same book?
00:33:46.000 Imagine if there was a pill that could cure all of this unconscious racism.
00:33:50.000 You take it, and now there's no such thing.
00:33:50.000 Boom!
00:33:53.000 Well, an entire multi-billion dollar industry bites the dust.
00:33:56.000 You know, it's important to recognize there are people with entrenched interests who want to keep social problems going.
00:34:01.000 It is where they make their money.
00:34:03.000 It's the friction which produces the sparks of their income.
00:34:06.000 Yeah.
00:34:06.000 Otherwise, Al Sharpton would be outside rattling a tin cup and people wouldn't give it to him because they think he'd be using it to buy drugs.
00:34:11.000 Probably right, too.
00:34:12.000 So we had a meeting with YouTube in New York.
00:34:15.000 I remember they brought us out and there were a lot of other conservatives there.
00:34:18.000 And they did talk about how they wanted to correct some issues.
00:34:21.000 And then, remember, the conversation kind of ended up moving on.
00:34:24.000 And they asked us, have you thought about changing your content?
00:34:27.000 And...
00:34:29.000 I swear to you, and there's some very nice people.
00:34:31.000 There are a couple people there who behind the scenes really want to help, but they're so terrified.
00:34:36.000 They're like a beaten child.
00:34:38.000 Hey, Satanists, I've got a great idea.
00:34:41.000 Different God.
00:34:42.000 How does that work for you?
00:34:44.000 Would that help you out quite a bit?
00:34:45.000 Yeah.
00:34:46.000 Worship Bob Marley.
00:34:47.000 Everybody loves that guy.
00:34:48.000 Well, I'm a levee in Satanist, so technically I don't believe in God.
00:34:51.000 Oh my God, you're missing the point.
00:34:52.000 But yes, really, do you think about changing your content?
00:34:56.000 And they said, well, with restricted mode, we really say, could a six-year-old watch it?
00:35:00.000 And that's when I said, oh, okay, started reading it.
00:35:04.000 Here we go.
00:35:07.000 What was it?
00:35:07.000 It was shame on a nigga who tried to run game on a nigga.
00:35:11.000 I'll fuck your ass up.
00:35:13.000 You'd show this to your six-year-old?
00:35:14.000 And they were like, like they had a heart attack.
00:35:16.000 Listen, this is unrestricted.
00:35:18.000 I think that is part of leftist sex education for six-year-olds.
00:35:21.000 I think that is pretty much the textbook, so that's important to put in consideration.
00:35:25.000 Yeah, right after they put a condom on a banana.
00:35:27.000 This goes alongside with the labeling thing too, right?
00:35:29.000 So I've got a video that's happening at the moment, which is my interview with the guy from Google.
00:35:34.000 And yeah, so a bunch of news outlets and media outlets have written about it.
00:35:37.000 And you know, it's like Gollum with the ring, you know, because they know the right thing to do is to present the arguments and let the audience decide for themselves.
00:35:47.000 They know that that's the right thing to do.
00:35:49.000 That's the responsible thing to do.
00:35:50.000 But they just can't help themselves.
00:35:52.000 They have to put...
00:35:55.000 Alt-right, whatever it's going to be.
00:35:57.000 They can't stop themselves.
00:35:59.000 They can't not frame it.
00:36:00.000 They can't not give you the words that are supposed to make you think negatively of the person.
00:36:04.000 They can't just say, here's the arguments, here's the perspective, here's the sources, here's the data, decide for yourself.
00:36:09.000 It's like, no, we can't!
00:36:10.000 We have to condition what it is that you're going to say.
00:36:13.000 And I think that's the difference.
00:36:14.000 You and I and the alternative media, as it's called, I trust my audience.
00:36:18.000 I'll present the arguments, let them think for themselves.
00:36:20.000 But the mainstream media, they can't resist having to frame it.
00:36:23.000 I mean, Dr.
00:36:23.000 Jordan Peterson, alt-right.
00:36:25.000 Are you kidding me?
00:36:26.000 This is ridiculous.
00:36:27.000 But they just can't help themselves.
00:36:29.000 If it's an opinion they don't like or an argument they don't like, they have to frame it with some snarky negative comment.
00:36:35.000 And I think that's a huge difference.
00:36:37.000 People pick up on that a lot.
00:36:38.000 Yeah, I think that's a good point.
00:36:39.000 Speaking of problems, okay, so I'm interested in your opinion here because you're obviously a big Trump supporter, but you've been a longtime pacifist.
00:36:46.000 Where are you on the North Korea issue?
00:36:48.000 Is that a quandary at all?
00:36:50.000 I'm a big fan of self-defense, so I'm not a pacifist in so far as let the tank roll over you and don't do anything.
00:36:56.000 So I'm a big fan of self-defense.
00:36:58.000 You know, those of us who are old enough to have lived through the hysteria regarding the weapons of mass destruction under Saddam Hussein, I gotta tell ya, it's a burn that doesn't heal.
00:37:08.000 That was a significant, like...
00:37:11.000 Middle East destabilizing, Europe collapsing kind of burn.
00:37:15.000 So I'm very skeptical when I hear all this weapons of mass destruction stuff.
00:37:19.000 And going back to like Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, they're the guys that they delivered a nuclear reactor to the guy.
00:37:24.000 They said, yeah, go for it.
00:37:25.000 It's going to make the region so much more peaceful.
00:37:27.000 Of course, that is never talked about in the mainstream media.
00:37:31.000 You know, it's a very, very tempting thing to think, well, you march in there and you just go and replace the regime.
00:37:38.000 And I think it would turn out different than Iraq.
00:37:40.000 The average IQ in the Korean Peninsula is like 105, 106.
00:37:45.000 It's very, very different from the Middle East.
00:37:46.000 So there is more of a chance.
00:37:48.000 You know, I mean, you drop nukes and endless amounts of conventional weapons.
00:37:51.000 I don't think that that changes so much, though, because of the brainwashing.
00:37:53.000 You know, you kind of remove IQ from any portion of the equation because they believe that actually a dear leader can read their thoughts.
00:37:59.000 I mean, it's crazy.
00:38:02.000 Look at Japan, Second World War.
00:38:04.000 Ridiculous amounts of conventional weapons, two nuclear bombs, and they turned relatively peaceful.
00:38:08.000 Western, democratic, pretty capitalist.
00:38:11.000 They got the message.
00:38:13.000 Received our order on Korea!
00:38:16.000 The big problem in North Korea is not just the supposed weapons of mass destruction, but they have massive amounts of conventional military weaponry.
00:38:24.000 They have conventional, you know, the howitzers and the guns and all of the giant armaments that are pointed At all of the American bases just south of the border, that is where things could get really, really unpleasant.
00:38:36.000 And I do not like the idea of America as the world's policeman.
00:38:38.000 It's a local issue.
00:38:39.000 Let the local, you know, you've got Japan, you've got China, you've got South Korea.
00:38:43.000 Maybe the American Air Force could do something like take out their capacity to use air power or take out any missile factories they could find.
00:38:50.000 But as far as anything that goes on in the ground, I don't think America should have anything to do with it.
00:38:54.000 I think America's kind of shot its vault and its credibility in various places of Ever since the Second World War, it's really worked out well.
00:39:01.000 What if they really attack Guam?
00:39:03.000 At that point, do we go, okay, something has to happen, do we think?
00:39:07.000 I mean, here's my position.
00:39:08.000 I think that this misrepresentation, and we had a timeline on this yesterday, as though this is in any capacity Donald Trump's fault.
00:39:14.000 When you go from 1994, 2003, multiple instances of them reneging on their deals, testing nuclear facilities, no punishment, no sanctions.
00:39:24.000 The guy was lighting them off like Fourth of July with Barack Obama.
00:39:27.000 For the media to say that it's Donald Trump's fault is very irresponsible.
00:39:31.000 However, I do think it's almost kind of like a police officer who isn't the best at de-escalating the situation.
00:39:37.000 Like, Donald Trump, if he does plan on doing something, keep it close to the chest.
00:39:41.000 Either do something or don't, but we don't want to get these guys saber-rattling.
00:39:44.000 You know, someone that freaky and unstable, don't tell them if you're going to do something.
00:39:49.000 Just drop the big one and walk away.
00:39:51.000 Well, I mean, anybody who's crazy and cornered is going to be highly dangerous.
00:39:56.000 And so, I mean, it is one of these things that if there is solid intelligence that something's going on, if there's a way of taking out that threat in a relatively hands-off, non-boots-on-the-ground kind of way, I could see a case being made for that as a defensive maneuver.
00:40:11.000 But, you know, keep pushing the guy, keep pushing the guy, you may end up creating exactly the kind of conflict that you claim you want to avoid by cornering him and giving him nowhere to go but, you know, coming at you with everything he's got.
00:40:23.000 Yeah, yeah, and I really, you know, this guy, it really does come down to sociological issues.
00:40:29.000 It comes down to psychological issues with him.
00:40:30.000 This is a guy who, in order to convince people he was a deity, or his dad did, said he got 11 holes in one in his first game of golf.
00:40:36.000 Like, of all the things to pick...
00:40:38.000 He was driving at age 3 or something like that?
00:40:39.000 Yeah, you know, you can't get the Kim Jong-un haircut.
00:40:41.000 It's banned.
00:40:42.000 The 85 lesbian haircut is illegal for anyone.
00:40:44.000 Is it banned or is it banned?
00:40:45.000 It's banned!
00:40:46.000 It's banned!
00:40:46.000 I mean, if you look at the way that they treat...
00:40:49.000 This is one thing I will say, though, and I think everyone can agree on.
00:40:52.000 When you have moral relativists from the left saying, well, what makes us think that we're good and they're bad?
00:40:57.000 Because they punch women in a stomach in internment camps until they have abortions.
00:41:00.000 Because they absolutely rip children from their parents and murder them.
00:41:03.000 They are the most cruel regime you have ever seen if you read up on what happens in those camps.
00:41:08.000 And it's not the same as saying, oh, you know what, Donald Trump has someone from Goldman Sachs in his cabinet.
00:41:14.000 No, it is the, I think, the most despotic, dictatorial, evil, and vicious regime.
00:41:21.000 And, you know, where are the Marxists who take ownership of it?
00:41:24.000 This was founded as a communist country, and this is exactly where it's ended up.
00:41:28.000 So can we just learn this lesson for once in our damn history?
00:41:32.000 This is where communism leads.
00:41:34.000 This is where expanding state control over the economy, over personal lives.
00:41:37.000 This is where it all leads.
00:41:38.000 This is the end goal.
00:41:40.000 Concentration camps, starvation, a huge allegiance.
00:41:43.000 What is his father?
00:41:44.000 They, like, plucked the feathers of, like, 10,000 little fluffy birds to make his pillows.
00:41:50.000 I mean, it's completely psychotic, insane, evil, dictatorial, monstrous mess.
00:41:54.000 And I want the Marxists to step up and say, oh, yeah, you know, he's one of us, so this all started with us.
00:41:59.000 Yeah, well, it's almost as bad a regime as Google, and I blame the evil of the North Koreans on religion.
00:42:04.000 As you know, they are the cause of all wars, like we see in North Korea.
00:42:08.000 Devout Christians, and or Muslims and North Koreans, I don't know, take your pick at this point.
00:42:12.000 Stefan Molyneux.
00:42:14.000 Hang on, just one last thing.
00:42:15.000 I thought the End Times guy was going to be a bit more satanic and devilish-looking than squat-fat Elvis.
00:42:20.000 That shadow hanging over humanity does not work for me as far as it's terrifying.
00:42:24.000 And I see before me a pale horse, and beneath him, a man with a Terminator 1 lesbian-looking haircut.
00:42:31.000 And hell followed with him.
00:42:32.000 Ben Perioki ends the world.
00:42:33.000 Yeah, I know.
00:42:34.000 It really is.
00:42:35.000 It really is.
00:42:36.000 You know, you expect the devil to be charming or really scary.
00:42:39.000 This is like...
00:42:40.000 It's kind of laughable.
00:42:42.000 Stefan Molyneux on YouTube.
00:42:44.000 It's Free Domain Radio.
00:42:45.000 Get that right.
00:42:46.000 Free Domain Radio.
00:42:47.000 He has a book coming out.
00:42:48.000 When it comes out, we will have him back for an hour.
00:42:50.000 And please, everyone, go watch his interview with James DeMore.
00:42:50.000 Stefan, thank you.
00:42:52.000 Thank you so much for being here, sir.
00:42:54.000 We appreciate it.
00:42:55.000 Thanks, my friend.
00:42:56.000 A great pleasure.
00:42:57.000 Roman Millennial next!
00:42:58.000 - If you or a loved one have suffered side effects from Ben Shapiro's Tumblr, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
00:43:10.000 Ben Shapiro's double-wall insulated Tumblr has been found to increase the risk of rare cancers like mesothelioma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and severe AIDS. Please don't wait!
00:43:19.000 If you have mesothelioma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or severe AIDS as a direct result of your subscription to The Ben Shapiro Show and his asbestos-laden Tumblr, quickly, Join Mug Club at lotterwithcreder.com slash mugclub for your free information packet and annual membership for $99.
00:43:34.000 $69 for students, veterans, or active military today.
00:43:37.000 Don't wait, as your life may depend on it.
00:43:37.000 Hurry!
00:43:39.000 Join today at louderwithcreditor.com slash mug club.
00:43:42.000 Hey, you feel good about yourself this week seeing a guy get fired at Google?
00:43:53.000 well, Guess what?
00:43:55.000 That could be any one of us.
00:43:56.000 And that's why we have Mug Club.
00:43:58.000 For the daily content, everyone there, you get a daily show, you get morning grinders every single day.
00:44:02.000 Every single day.
00:44:03.000 Every single week.
00:44:04.000 Why did I say every single day?
00:44:05.000 It's not false advertising.
00:44:06.000 My brain is just, I just have a low IQ. LottoWithCrader.com slash short-term working memory is not that great.
00:44:14.000 We almost got heat stroke earlier today.
00:44:16.000 LottoWithCrader.com slash Mug Club.
00:44:17.000 It keeps everyone employed and it allows us to not be beholden.
00:44:21.000 I don't want you to just look at it and say, well, you know, at the five-something dollars a month, it's $69 annually if you're a student, veteran, or active military.
00:44:29.000 Most people who watch us on YouTube are students or a significant amount.
00:44:32.000 I don't want you to say, well, you know, is it the five-something for a mug?
00:44:35.000 And I want you to think, how important is it for content like this not to go away, like guys at Google?
00:44:43.000 Because that's what's happening.
00:44:44.000 And that's why we're joining ranks with other people.
00:44:47.000 That's why we're bringing more people on.
00:44:48.000 And the more you support the paid content, the more we're able to get free content out there and just be a thorn in their side.
00:44:56.000 It's a hand-edged, wonderful mug.
00:44:58.000 You also actually do get a mug.
00:44:59.000 It doesn't travel as well as Shapiro's Tumblr.
00:45:02.000 I'll give him that.
00:45:03.000 But...
00:45:05.000 And it doesn't stand up as well to a bat.
00:45:07.000 That little bastard is tough.
00:45:09.000 But, you know, listen.
00:45:11.000 When you get up in the morning, you don't want to go, oh, what is this coffee?
00:45:15.000 Is it light roast taste of steel?
00:45:20.000 You don't want steel in your mouth.
00:45:21.000 No, that's why you get porcelain.
00:45:22.000 Go watch people The Art of Cupping with tea and coffee.
00:45:25.000 They only do it in ceramic or porcelain.
00:45:27.000 Ladderwithcladder.com slash mug club.
00:45:29.000 Sign up.
00:45:29.000 Otherwise, well, maybe if you don't sign up, if you just hate good beverages.
00:45:33.000 That's the Pong dance.
00:45:56.000 I think of my head as a pong ball going between paddles.
00:45:59.000 I can see that.
00:45:59.000 No, not ping pong.
00:46:00.000 Gosh, you don't know the Ramones.
00:46:00.000 Pong.
00:46:01.000 You don't know pong.
00:46:02.000 You don't know anything about the things.
00:46:04.000 Ping pong.
00:46:05.000 Gosh.
00:46:06.000 You don't even know about Atari or pong.
00:46:08.000 We have to educate them on pong.
00:46:09.000 Anyways, well, the next guest is Young.
00:46:11.000 Hopefully, I think she's more adept at history.
00:46:13.000 She was a research assistant.
00:46:15.000 She worked in universities.
00:46:16.000 Very prestigious, so she must.
00:46:17.000 You know her on YouTube, Roaming Millennial.
00:46:19.000 You can follow her on Twitter.
00:46:20.000 There's her lower third right there below us.
00:46:22.000 Also, Roaming Mill, because someone else must have Roaming Millennial, I guess.
00:46:26.000 Miss Millennial, as you're known here.
00:46:28.000 How are you?
00:46:29.000 I'm good.
00:46:30.000 Thanks so much for having me.
00:46:31.000 And actually, Twitter limits how long your Twitter handle can be.
00:46:35.000 So everything else is drawing Millennial except Twitter, and it triggers me each time I look at it.
00:46:39.000 I can imagine it would be very triggering.
00:46:41.000 And by the way, for people out there, yes, she does.
00:46:43.000 She looks like Belle right now in that initial scene in Beauty and the Beast.
00:46:46.000 But I mean Cartoon Belle, not that Emma Watson, Caterpillar, Unibrow fake Belle.
00:46:53.000 Yeah, okay.
00:46:54.000 How was it?
00:46:55.000 Good.
00:46:55.000 I imagine you like reading books.
00:46:56.000 But you should stop.
00:46:58.000 This is folly for a lady.
00:46:59.000 Also, in 1740s France, apparently there were black people in positions of ruling with powdered wigs.
00:47:04.000 It's a very popular position.
00:47:04.000 Black librarians.
00:47:05.000 Yeah, they're actually surprisingly progressive.
00:47:08.000 Yeah, 1740s France.
00:47:08.000 Yeah.
00:47:10.000 Those house librarians.
00:47:11.000 And then they turn into a bookcase.
00:47:11.000 Who would know?
00:47:12.000 They were the initial Ikea.
00:47:14.000 Black person turns into a bookcase.
00:47:16.000 That was the film.
00:47:17.000 Okay, Roman Millennial.
00:47:19.000 I always feel like I like Cher or something when I'm using a screen name.
00:47:22.000 You were talking about...
00:47:23.000 I know you've talked about this.
00:47:24.000 You've tweeted about it.
00:47:25.000 Set up for our audience the controversy this week.
00:47:27.000 We've been talking about Google and Slate and how science isn't true, apparently.
00:47:32.000 But you've been...
00:47:34.000 Sort of centered on this affirmative action case that the controversy centered around Trump.
00:47:37.000 For people who don't know, set it up for them.
00:47:40.000 Sure.
00:47:41.000 So earlier last week, it was reported by The New York Times that they had received a document from the Department of Justice saying that they were looking for people to handle a case regarding racial discrimination in college admissions.
00:47:53.000 Now, after this story got out, a bunch of, you know, lefty publications started trying to paint this as the Trump administration going after affirmative action in general in colleges to try and protect the white race.
00:48:05.000 You know, like two days later, it was the whites.
00:48:09.000 Two days later, the Department of Justice themselves actually...
00:48:09.000 Yes.
00:48:14.000 Let out that, no, this wasn't across the board targeting affirmative action policies.
00:48:18.000 This was actually regarding one single case that was actually put forward during the Obama administration, but they had ignored.
00:48:26.000 So now Trump's, you know, they're dealing with it now.
00:48:28.000 That was actually put forward by Asian Americans regarding Harvard's racial discrimination.
00:48:32.000 So, you know, this wasn't Trump's administration trying to white knight the whites.
00:48:36.000 It was actually Asian Americans who a lot of people don't know, but they're actually the ones who suffer most under affirmative action.
00:48:42.000 I'm trying to get some fair treatment and some justice regarding their admissions to Harvard because there's a huge gap there, the number of Asian applicants who apply versus those who are accepted.
00:48:52.000 Yeah, well, there's another example of President Obama kicking the Asian can down the road for Trump.
00:48:57.000 Down the road.
00:48:57.000 Nukes with North Korea.
00:48:58.000 No justice from him.
00:48:59.000 No, and the slants, the case, the band case.
00:49:02.000 So, hey, you're partially Asian, but if I look at you, it's kind of like the Dean Cain thing, where I say, I don't know.
00:49:13.000 So did you face the...
00:49:15.000 When you got your SAT scores, did you have to get several dozen points above the average because you were put in the Asian pool?
00:49:22.000 Was it more competitive?
00:49:23.000 Or was it Canada?
00:49:24.000 It's free.
00:49:24.000 So who cares?
00:49:25.000 Well, actually, I went to University of the United States and I did well on the SATs, you know, Asian pride.
00:49:32.000 And, you know, it's funny because I'm actually when you look at me, a lot of people either think, you know, I'm white, maybe Italian.
00:49:38.000 You know, I get Hispanic sometimes.
00:49:40.000 I never get actually straight up Asian unless people are familiar with how Eurasian people look and they know people who are mixed themselves, whatever.
00:49:47.000 But the thing is, my name is pretty Chinese.
00:49:50.000 I have an English name and a Chinese first name and a Chinese last name.
00:49:54.000 And people ask me this all the time since, you know, I've kind of talked about this problem before.
00:49:57.000 I get a lot of Asians saying like, hey, I'm about to apply.
00:50:01.000 Should I actually mark down that I'm Asian?
00:50:03.000 Now, since I'm biracial, I usually just put other.
00:50:06.000 But yeah, I mean...
00:50:08.000 What happened to that Asian pride you were talking about?
00:50:10.000 Hashtag Asian pride.
00:50:11.000 Hashtag Asian expectation.
00:50:12.000 That's the bare minimum.
00:50:13.000 Don't tell nobody.
00:50:15.000 Hashtag representing the other, just ambiguous, don't want to get pigeonholed by affirmative action policies, right?
00:50:20.000 Yes.
00:50:21.000 If I were an Asian applying to university right now, or even as a white person, frankly, I would, you know, if it's possible, just not answer that question or say other, because, you know, it's come out that, yes, like, if you are Asian, you are much, much less likely to be accepted.
00:50:21.000 No, but it's true.
00:50:35.000 If you are white, you know, a little better than Hispanic, slightly more.
00:50:38.000 And then, you know, if you're an African-American, unfortunately, regardless of how you do academically, it's kind of, you know, like, Welcome wagon for you to come.
00:50:46.000 And it's not that I don't want African Americans in college.
00:50:48.000 It's just, you know, it's not fair to them.
00:50:51.000 We've talked about that because they have much higher dropout rates.
00:50:54.000 They're much more likely to be in the bottom, you know, 10th percentile of the class.
00:50:57.000 And they struggle and it becomes really stressful.
00:51:00.000 And you end up with a kid dropping out of college as opposed to going into a program where maybe he was, you know, he was more appropriately suited at the time or his scores.
00:51:08.000 You put him, you thrust him in with a group of people who performed better than he did.
00:51:12.000 That's the problem with affirmative action.
00:51:13.000 A lot of people haven't really read those statistics.
00:51:15.000 It's sad that more people often end up dropping out than completing college.
00:51:19.000 And the leftist needs to decide, do they really believe in equal opportunity?
00:51:22.000 Because they seem to push equal outcome.
00:51:24.000 That's what they really believe in.
00:51:26.000 And ironically, that creates inequality and opportunity for people like Ms.
00:51:30.000 I know your name is not Chan, but it was just the Asian name I could think of.
00:51:30.000 Chan over here.
00:51:33.000 Actually, there's a surprisingly good chance, just statistically speaking.
00:51:37.000 Just roll the dice.
00:51:38.000 It's like Smith.
00:51:40.000 Or Silva in Brazil is like Smith.
00:51:42.000 So what's going to happen with this case?
00:51:44.000 Because it was presented, as you talked about in the New York Times, Trump trying to protect the whites.
00:51:48.000 For what reason?
00:51:49.000 We don't know.
00:51:50.000 What do you think is really going to happen here with this case?
00:51:55.000 Well, the Supreme Court has ruled several times that affirmative action programs are legal as long as they don't have racial quotas or racial point systems, but colleges are allowed to take race into account when deciding admissions along with other factors, right?
00:52:10.000 So it's not likely that affirmative action as a whole, that's not going anywhere.
00:52:14.000 We just have to deal with that.
00:52:16.000 In terms of what's going to happen to Harvard specifically, there are some really, I'm sorry to say, damning stats for Harvard.
00:52:22.000 I think it's going to be really hard for them to argue that this wasn't targeted.
00:52:27.000 The case hasn't been released fully, not to my knowledge, so I'm not exactly sure what kind of outcome the coalition of Asian groups that have launched this complaint are looking for.
00:52:38.000 But I think this is great at the very least, right?
00:52:40.000 Because, I mean, who knows where this is going to go?
00:52:42.000 But at the very least, this is bringing attention to a problem that has existed for a long time in the United States.
00:52:46.000 You know, an economy where skilled labor, including but not limited to college degrees, are an asset.
00:52:52.000 Like, universities choosing students, like you said, who aren't going to finish, it's actually harming the economy and just, you know, saddling these students who weren't prepared to be there with tons of unnecessary debt, probably.
00:53:02.000 Well, it's a human right, so once we just declare it a human right and it's free, you know, Bernie will be happy, and then there's no more issue.
00:53:07.000 Then we just punt it at the taxpayers for another, I don't know, $18 trillion.
00:53:12.000 It's interesting that you bring this up, because we've talked about this.
00:53:14.000 It's kind of rare that you hear what used to be.
00:53:17.000 I think this generation of Asians now, you get some social justice left.
00:53:20.000 But for the longest time, you didn't really hear them start marches or file a lot of suits.
00:53:24.000 They kind of just went about their business.
00:53:26.000 You know, that's why they they would flourish.
00:53:28.000 They'd be in the top business percentile.
00:53:29.000 They'd be often the wealthiest people in the country.
00:53:32.000 They just just filled up our universities, Asian-Americans.
00:53:35.000 But now you're seeing a lot more complaints.
00:53:38.000 You're seeing a lot far more younger Asians who are complaining about discrimination and sort of, you know, future careers at salon dot com.
00:53:46.000 Have you noticed that, being raised with a traditionally sort of Asian family, but being among younger Asians that a lot of them suck?
00:53:54.000 Yeah, definitely.
00:53:55.000 Well, so, you know, my father, he grew up in Hong Kong.
00:53:59.000 He came over to Canada in college.
00:54:01.000 That's where he met my mom.
00:54:03.000 You know, and we moved back to Asia when I was just a few months old.
00:54:06.000 But, you know, coming back to the States, I have a lot of friends who are Chinese.
00:54:09.000 But if you actually listen to them, they're like Mr.
00:54:12.000 Noodles, right?
00:54:12.000 Looks Asian, but not really.
00:54:14.000 And so I think in these, like, later generations, you know, first generation or, you know, fresh off the boat immigrants like my dad who are Asian, they're very...
00:54:23.000 I don't want to say like anti-hippie job, but yeah, anti-hippie job, focus on financial stability, stuff like that.
00:54:28.000 Political activism doesn't really lead to financial stability, but you have these generations who have been in the United States longer, so they're kind of, I think, adapting more to the culture of, I don't want to say Complaining about things.
00:54:41.000 But yeah, you know, being more politically active, being more civically minded, sometimes for better, sometimes for worse.
00:54:45.000 Like you said, like a lot of these Asians who are younger are social justice warriors.
00:54:49.000 Well, I do have a question for you because I don't know if you've...
00:54:51.000 I think it was the tipping point, and I think it's Gladwell, where he talks about how a lot of Asian immigrants, specifically Asians and Indians, would come over and they would open up shops.
00:54:58.000 They'd be business owners.
00:54:59.000 And then they wanted their children to be doctors or to be lawyers and go to college.
00:55:03.000 Now, a lot of them came over and didn't.
00:55:04.000 They opened up businesses and made an absolute ton of money and saved it to send their kids to higher education.
00:55:10.000 So now you have a generation of Asian immigrants or sort of second generation removed from Asian immigrants who are being thrust into the university system, the indoctrination system, and often aren't making as much money as their parents and are being saddled with debt.
00:55:23.000 That's something a lot of people don't understand.
00:55:25.000 It'll get worse the more we get socialized with healthcare, as your parents well know in Canada.
00:55:30.000 Good doctors leave.
00:55:31.000 But it's a twist of irony there that they came here.
00:55:34.000 You know, we're not educated, a lot of us.
00:55:36.000 We're going to open up shops, bodegas, family-run businesses.
00:55:39.000 But they were entrepreneurial and send their kids to college.
00:55:41.000 And some of that spirit has been lost.
00:55:43.000 It was more so discussing this economically in the book.
00:55:46.000 But I wonder if that's also happening culturally.
00:55:49.000 Well, yeah, definitely.
00:55:50.000 I mean, it's it's there's a marked difference between the, I guess, work ethic of these earlier generations and these later generations.
00:55:57.000 Like you said, I mean, even if you look at the the current incomes of, let's say, you know, Vietnamese immigrants, a lot of whom came over during the war had absolutely nothing.
00:56:06.000 A lot of them are still doing better than the average white household.
00:56:10.000 And, you know, this isn't due to education.
00:56:11.000 This is just due to work ethic.
00:56:13.000 And I think, you know, the brilliance of the American dream.
00:56:15.000 But I think, you know, these But Asian students who are right now going to these, you know, universities, expensive degrees, studying gender studies, then, you know, going to work at Salon, I think it goes to show that college can't fix everything, right?
00:56:28.000 I mean, a college degree is great, but it's not a magic degree.
00:56:30.000 It's not going to magically create wealth.
00:56:32.000 If you don't have that entrepreneurial spirit, that hard work ethic, it's still not going to get you anywhere.
00:56:38.000 Especially if it's a science degree, because as we know, science does not equate to truth.
00:56:41.000 Thank you, Slate.
00:56:42.000 You've taught us a valuable lesson today.
00:56:43.000 I had a question, because you bring this up, and it makes me think, I have a friend whose parents immigrated from Laos, and he kind of grew up in a very, like you said, a very conservative household, very entrepreneurial, but it's kind of the opposite for him.
00:56:55.000 Is this the one who served as the Tommy from Baltimore sketch?
00:56:59.000 Jeffrey from Baltimore.
00:56:59.000 Jeffrey from Baltimore.
00:57:00.000 Yes, go ahead, yeah.
00:57:01.000 So he kind of finds himself on the opposite side, where he sees the Black Lives Matter movement, he sees the LGBTQAIP movement, and kind of this decade of oppression Olympics, they feel a little left out.
00:57:12.000 It pushes him more toward conservatism because he feels so screwed and left behind by the rest of the minority classes in America right now.
00:57:20.000 I wonder if that's because it just comes down to parents giving you a critical thinking filter.
00:57:23.000 Do you think that's a big component to why you are the way you are?
00:57:26.000 I mean, personally, I can only speak from personal experience, but...
00:57:31.000 I want you to speak for all of Laos.
00:57:32.000 Yes, all of Laos.
00:57:33.000 Go, now.
00:57:33.000 On behalf of the Laotian people...
00:57:36.000 If King of the Hill serves me right, that is the correct eminem.
00:57:39.000 But yeah, I mean, I've got to say, when I think of people ask me that all the time, like, you know, you didn't grow up in the States, you grew up in, I mean, I grew up in mainland China for a bit, mainly Hong Kong, but also mainland China and Canada, too.
00:57:51.000 I mean, pretty socialist, if not straight up communist places.
00:57:54.000 Like, why do you think the way you do?
00:57:56.000 And I've got to say, a lot of it comes down to my parents.
00:57:59.000 And, you know, For a lot of these immigrants, I think there's a struggle between wanting to have your children assimilate into the new culture, but also give them the same values you had, between wanting to work your butt off to give them a good future, but also be able to spend the amount of time that you need to raise them properly, right?
00:58:16.000 So I don't think there's one answer across all immigrant populations, but I think the Asian population in general is a pretty interesting one, because if you look at any stats social justice warriors bring up to You know, imply that there is racial oppression of non-whites in the United States.
00:58:31.000 Asians completely knock any of those out of the water.
00:58:33.000 Well, then they say, well, Asians weren't exploited the way, well, who do you think built the railroads?
00:58:37.000 Shut up!
00:58:38.000 Exactly.
00:58:39.000 Internment camps were also a thing.
00:58:42.000 Let's talk about that.
00:58:43.000 Yeah.
00:58:43.000 Pretty recent in American history.
00:58:45.000 Okay, listen, pivoting because we have to go.
00:58:47.000 Let me ask you.
00:58:48.000 I believe you don't identify as a male.
00:58:52.000 I know that you certainly do not have a penis, from what I've heard on the streets.
00:58:55.000 Here's my question to you.
00:58:56.000 Do you find it offensive, based on the whole Google anti-diversity manifesto, for someone to suggest that a male might biologically have advantages that you don't and that you might have some advantages that he does not?
00:59:07.000 On a scale from 1 to 10, how offensive is it?
00:59:11.000 10 being extremely offensive, 1 being I don't care?
00:59:14.000 Yes.
00:59:16.000 A solid 6.4.
00:59:21.000 But I mean, you know, numbers are hard because as a woman, that's tricky.
00:59:25.000 Ah, I see what you did there because I thought she was leaning on that.
00:59:27.000 No, but it's ridiculous.
00:59:29.000 Obviously, this is actual evolutionary biology.
00:59:32.000 You know, social scientists also confirm this when you look at different distributions of career choices.
00:59:39.000 Saying an average is an average doesn't mean it's going to apply to every single person.
00:59:43.000 Maybe these women really do need to study science more for them to understand that.
00:59:43.000 I don't know.
00:59:46.000 I don't know.
00:59:47.000 Let me ask you this final question.
00:59:48.000 Actually, it's interesting because you were talking about being raised in mainland China, Canada, the United States.
00:59:51.000 Then you have these people at Slate and Salon saying, the gender difference, it's entirely sociological.
00:59:57.000 Did you see consistent differences between men and women across all the cultures?
01:00:03.000 If you did, is there one that stands out specifically?
01:00:05.000 Like, did you see, okay, this is a clear example of where men and women are different biologically, whether it's mainland China, Canada, or the United States, regardless of context.
01:00:14.000 Actually, well, something that I did notice that the United States is one of the most...
01:00:18.000 Western culture in general is one of the most equitable I've ever seen, right?
01:00:22.000 And just traveling all over Asia, just, you know, the number of female executives, for example, that I see, the number of female professors that I see.
01:00:29.000 And, you know, that's obviously, you know, women in Hong Kong and China, we're not oppressed or anything like that.
01:00:34.000 But I just, you know, obviously...
01:00:37.000 The number of men who are CEOs worldwide is not coincidental, right?
01:00:42.000 And that looks at all different cultures.
01:00:43.000 And I think for people who are making these allegations, let's say against the person who wrote the memo, for them to actually be so insular looking only at the United States when trying to refute these biological aspects, I think it shows a lack of critical thinking, right?
01:00:56.000 If you actually cared about this, you would, like you said, look at all different cultures.
01:00:59.000 And I think when you look at different cultures everywhere, There is a pattern, right?
01:01:04.000 You can't deny that.
01:01:05.000 I think the United States is one of the most equal places for opportunity that I've ever seen.
01:01:09.000 Yeah, well, the only difference, I would say, in China, they are closer in size.
01:01:13.000 But, in a twist turn of life's fate, the Black Widow female is bigger and eats the male mate.
01:01:18.000 Roaming Millennial on YouTube.
01:01:20.000 Roaming Millennial, thank you so much for calling in.
01:01:22.000 By the way, she's Hong Kong.
01:01:24.000 We should have said that.
01:01:24.000 Hong Kong.
01:01:24.000 Stayed up late, early morning, whatever it is.
01:01:26.000 Thank you so much.
01:01:27.000 We'll have to have you back soon, okay?
01:01:28.000 Great.
01:01:29.000 Thanks so much for having me.
01:01:30.000 And we'll wrap this up after this.
01:01:31.000 Looks lovely.
01:01:32.000 Lovely.
01:01:33.000 You need to sit back.
01:01:33.000 All right, thanks, Jared.
01:01:34.000 Carlton!
01:01:49.000 You watching LWC again?
01:01:51.000 Is it 9 p.m.
01:01:52.000 Eastern on weekdays?
01:01:53.000 Stop asking stupid questions, Josephine!
01:01:57.000 All you do is watch that and cop.
01:01:59.000 And it doesn't make you know what Rear's counselor said to not mess with my LWC time, because you know it sets me off.
01:02:05.000 For only 6 to 9.99 annually, I get access to Louder with Crowder every damn day, plus Morning Riders, plus the entire CRTV light up, and this most beautiful I've ever seen hand-edged smoke.
01:02:16.000 I'm a part of something.
01:02:18.000 Why can't you understand that?
01:02:20.000 And I want cops in case they rerun my episode and I can use it as evidence and an appeal.
01:02:32.000 *music* Hello, a lot of crowd of viewers.
01:02:45.000 Papa here.
01:02:46.000 Don't forget that you can listen to the podcast on the go on iTunes and SoundCloud.
01:02:52.000 the audio, you can download it and you can listen at your leisure here here here here here here here you can download it and you can listen at your leisure here Oh,
01:03:19.000 that was a drowning that was a drowning dance.
01:03:45.000 Roaming millennial.
01:03:45.000 Roaming millennial.
01:03:46.000 Such a shame that she didn't show herself for months or years.
01:03:50.000 That still boggles my mind to today.
01:03:52.000 It is bizarre.
01:03:54.000 Maybe she's retarded.
01:03:55.000 Maybe she's retarded.
01:03:57.000 It sounds worse when you say it because of the enunciation for some reason.
01:04:02.000 Speaking of, that was a drowning dance.
01:04:03.000 People have been requesting a drowning dance.
01:04:05.000 We were just talking about this earlier in the first segment.
01:04:09.000 I thought offensive used to have a standard.
01:04:10.000 Now it's just whatever makes you feel bad about yourself.
01:04:12.000 I was actually talking on Glenn Beck's show about this today.
01:04:14.000 You know, I have this nagging injury, and I haven't had a lot of time, so I haven't had time to go to the gym.
01:04:18.000 I can't really lift weights because I have a nagging injury in my knee and my shoulder right now.
01:04:21.000 So I'm like, well, you know what?
01:04:22.000 I'm just not going to do nothing, so just get in the pool and do something.
01:04:25.000 I have all those problems, too.
01:04:27.000 Yes.
01:04:27.000 All of them.
01:04:28.000 I just got in the pool and did something.
01:04:29.000 By the way, I found out you can get really dehydrated in the pool without knowing.
01:04:32.000 Because you're swimming for, you know, 40 minutes, but you're not drinking water.
01:04:35.000 So be careful with that, especially in, you know, 95 degree heat.
01:04:38.000 And there were these water weights at the pool where I was going.
01:04:40.000 And I actually used them.
01:04:41.000 I was like, oh, you know what?
01:04:42.000 That actually, it felt pretty good to move my shoulders.
01:04:44.000 And it seemed to kind of help my rotator.
01:04:46.000 So I went online on Amazon.
01:04:48.000 And looked at water weights.
01:04:50.000 Hey, I feel good about myself, even though I can't really do what I usually...
01:04:53.000 I'm doing something.
01:04:54.000 And then I started reading the reviews, and it was all like 97-year-old women with water aquatic glasses.
01:05:00.000 And they were using the big...
01:05:01.000 I use the big one, but it's not enough resistance.
01:05:04.000 And I felt bad about myself.
01:05:05.000 And then I felt even worse about myself when the Internet had tracked that I had read the reviews.
01:05:09.000 And so I'd be going on other sites, and I'd be seeing ads for mesothelioma and Wilford Brimley diabetes.
01:05:16.000 It made me feel bad about myself, but no one was trying to make me feel...
01:05:19.000 I'm not a 97-year-old woman.
01:05:20.000 I'm like, this is what the internet thinks I am?
01:05:22.000 But no one was doing that on purpose.
01:05:25.000 But the FaceApp, you could be.
01:05:26.000 The FaceApp, you could be.
01:05:27.000 But you were making a point earlier during the break that I think was an important one.
01:05:32.000 Yeah.
01:05:32.000 Well, I was saying, it's funny how we talk so much this week about the tech industry.
01:05:36.000 We talk with Owen about the entertainment industry and the culture of silencing that goes on there with any kind of opinions or ideologies of dissent.
01:05:45.000 Well, now you're seeing that, as we just talked about.
01:05:47.000 For the first time, openly, they're trying to transition that to the scientific community.
01:05:51.000 They used to say we're the party of science, but now the entertainment industry, writers, reporters, are telling the scientific community they need to shut up.
01:05:58.000 So I think there's obviously a real problem with the silencing culture of the left.
01:06:02.000 They don't want information out there.
01:06:04.000 They don't want anybody...
01:06:05.000 Ironically, diversity of opinion and thought and ideas.
01:06:09.000 But I think there's also a really big problem with the culture of...
01:06:15.000 Cowardice amongst conservatives to speak up.
01:06:17.000 Because you think about this.
01:06:18.000 Think about the Google memo and the polling.
01:06:20.000 50% agreed that James should not have been fired.
01:06:25.000 Where are all these people?
01:06:27.000 At some point, these A-list actors in the world who are hiding in their cabins, conservative.
01:06:33.000 At some point, we need these people to step up and come out.
01:06:35.000 And we know a lot of them, too.
01:06:36.000 That's unfortunate.
01:06:38.000 Obviously, you've seen people on this show.
01:06:39.000 You can do the math.
01:06:40.000 People who haven't necessarily been.
01:06:40.000 They've even come on the show and said, we can't necessarily discuss politics.
01:06:43.000 Yeah.
01:06:44.000 But clearly, if someone like Gary Sinise is coming on the show and you see his Lieutenant Dan Foundation where he entertains the troops, you can probably guess where he lines up.
01:06:52.000 He just doesn't want to be ugly politically.
01:06:54.000 And you can guess any other celebrities who we often have on where they line up.
01:06:57.000 But it's true, there are way, way more who are in the closet.
01:07:00.000 There's way more, and it's just they're lending, they're giving way to this culture of silencing and this radical swing to the left that we see.
01:07:07.000 And it's just kind of like at some point you're allowing and you're almost...
01:07:10.000 At one point, are we kind of guilty too?
01:07:12.000 Yeah.
01:07:13.000 Of allowing it.
01:07:13.000 Well, I don't think we are.
01:07:14.000 I don't think we are.
01:07:15.000 Not specifically.
01:07:15.000 I certainly don't think we are.
01:07:16.000 I don't think the Ben Shapiros of the world are.
01:07:18.000 I don't think Dean Cain is, Owen Benjamin, Nick DiPaolo.
01:07:21.000 Once you've painted Muhammad eating a big pile of poop.
01:07:22.000 Yeah, exactly.
01:07:24.000 Or people like Jim Norton.
01:07:26.000 We want to give credit where credit's due.
01:07:28.000 I think that's a good point.
01:07:28.000 I think that's important.
01:07:30.000 Just think about this.
01:07:31.000 Let me draw a hypothetical scenario out for you.
01:07:35.000 Okay, Google, if 50% of those people who didn't think it was that offensive, let's say it were just 25, let's say it were only 30% of people.
01:07:43.000 If they actually said something, if they actually said, hold on, we really don't think that's offensive, the guy wouldn't have been run out on a rail.
01:07:49.000 The guy wouldn't have been fired.
01:07:50.000 You think Google wants to lose half their employees?
01:07:52.000 We wouldn't have the problem with Google.
01:07:52.000 No, no.
01:07:54.000 We wouldn't have the problem with YouTube.
01:07:55.000 We wouldn't have the problem with Facebook.
01:07:56.000 If people in the entertainment industry, when you look at them when they're polled individually, when you look at people behind closed doors and they say, yeah, man, I really agree with you on this.
01:08:01.000 If they spoke up, we wouldn't all have to mutter these things.
01:08:05.000 We wouldn't all have to be behind closed doors.
01:08:07.000 And I think it's also, you know, this is a good example.
01:08:09.000 We were at the YouTube conference, the meeting in New York.
01:08:13.000 Now, the Daily Wire people, the people who do PragerU, they were there.
01:08:16.000 They were fantastic.
01:08:17.000 And they were really kind of allies when we started asking some uncomfortable questions.
01:08:21.000 But you and I both know.
01:08:23.000 People there who are going, well, and afterwards we had to fill out a form.
01:08:27.000 Yeah, I remember that.
01:08:27.000 And they said, well, we haven't had any other conservatives who have complained about YouTube or our policies.
01:08:33.000 We haven't gotten any on the forms.
01:08:35.000 Remember they said that to us?
01:08:36.000 Yeah.
01:08:36.000 And there were at least 20 plus conservative representatives there at YouTube.
01:08:41.000 And that really pisses me off.
01:08:42.000 It really does piss me off.
01:08:44.000 When you work for a think tank, and you go out there, and you say, oh, we're fighting the good fight, and you raise millions upon millions of-- tens of millions of dollars, depending on the think tanks, depending on the nonprofits that are out there.
01:08:52.000 Because that's also a big problem with the conservative movement, is it's almost entirely funded by nonprofits.
01:08:56.000 Ironically, for people who consider themselves capitalists, they're also cowards when it comes out to taking risks, it seems, as far as people who are forwarding the conservative movement.
01:09:05.000 When you raise all this money and you send to your donors, and I know this because I've worked with conservative nonprofits, and I've acted as a consultant to them years ago, and I said, I'm never going to do it again because I'm banging my head against a wall at some point.
01:09:15.000 I felt like the Kool-Aid guy trying to run through a wall, only I just shattered.
01:09:20.000 Instead of, oh yeah, it was just, oh no, everything just broke.
01:09:23.000 It's like the power team, but like if it was me.
01:09:26.000 Yeah, exactly.
01:09:28.000 And they send these papers out to their donors and these requests, and they say, hey, look, look at all these things we accomplished.
01:09:33.000 And they send out research papers, and they send out data that they've collected, or they send out maybe a protest that they took part in.
01:09:40.000 And the only reason they did it was so they can send it out to people who fund them more.
01:09:43.000 They're not actually looking to ruffle feathers.
01:09:45.000 When it comes time to actually just fill out a form with YouTube or Facebook or Google...
01:09:50.000 Just fill out a form.
01:09:51.000 They don't do that, let alone go out of their way to make calls, track people down, send emails, and send these people in positions of power maybe some information that might be uncomfortable.
01:10:00.000 They won't even fill out an automatic form.
01:10:02.000 And like I said, people who won't stand up, at a certain point you are using, they hide under this veil of politeness.
01:10:07.000 And I think we see that from the right.
01:10:08.000 And it is true because you do want to be able to engage in conversations.
01:10:11.000 You want to be decent people.
01:10:13.000 But then you have people who simply go out and try to virtue signal.
01:10:17.000 And this is the term that people have used.
01:10:20.000 Where there shouldn't be.
01:10:21.000 You compromise where there shouldn't be compromise.
01:10:23.000 You can be polite and still completely disagree.
01:10:26.000 By the way, that's another thing.
01:10:27.000 Conservatives, and I think sometimes we've kind of crossed wires with Mark Duplass, and even sometimes Dave Rubin, and then we agreed.
01:10:33.000 Finding common ground is not the same as being civil to someone.
01:10:38.000 You can be civil, and you don't have to find any common ground at all.
01:10:42.000 It's okay.
01:10:42.000 You don't have to say, well, what if I move in and you move in?
01:10:45.000 No.
01:10:45.000 No.
01:10:46.000 We don't need to move in.
01:10:47.000 We don't necessarily—we don't need to be a jerky— What do you think about, like, six-and-a-half-month abortions?
01:10:53.000 Yeah, what do you think about those?
01:10:54.000 We'll just keep moving it.
01:10:55.000 What do you think about, like, just, like, can you biologically change your sex if you cut off one ball?
01:11:00.000 No.
01:11:01.000 I'm not moving to the center.
01:11:02.000 Now, I don't need to tell you you're an absolute retard idiot slash you are a waste of oxygen because you believe that, but I can say, no, no, no balls.
01:11:12.000 Cut off one ball?
01:11:13.000 No.
01:11:13.000 Half a ball?
01:11:14.000 No balls.
01:11:15.000 But thank you for stopping by.
01:11:16.000 And we hide under this veil of politeness with conservatives.
01:11:19.000 And I think it's because we generally are more polite.
01:11:21.000 We generally are probably more, I guess I would say, at least professional.
01:11:27.000 And sometimes we allow politeness to act as an excuse for cowardice.
01:11:32.000 At a certain point, you're no longer being polite when you're not sending in the YouTube forms, when you're not speaking out against Google, but then you're muttering under an anonymous name on Reddit.
01:11:40.000 When you'll send us an email, and I know we have a lot of people out there, you'll send us an email saying, oh man, you know, I really wish I could show this in college because they're teaching us this school.
01:11:47.000 But how would you go about arguing it?
01:11:49.000 How would you try and do it subtly, but I don't want to fail?
01:11:52.000 You know what?
01:11:52.000 At some point, At some point, you're going to have to take a failing grade.
01:11:56.000 Don't do it all the time.
01:11:57.000 At some point, you might have to lose out on some roles in the entertainment industry.
01:12:01.000 At some point, your scientific thesis might be considered offensive to someone in the LGBTQAIP. Okay.
01:12:09.000 Community.
01:12:10.000 Silent apostrophe.
01:12:10.000 And then number two.
01:12:11.000 Send that to me.
01:12:11.000 That was an actual tweet.
01:12:13.000 At some point, you simply pointing out biology is going to be offensive to somebody who's going to call in sick because they don't like that you presented their biology, which might lend itself to them being more high-strung in the work environment and calling in sick.
01:12:27.000 They took sick days at Google because they said women don't handle stress in the workplace.
01:12:33.000 As well as men.
01:12:35.000 You can't write it better.
01:12:36.000 So they called in sick because work was too stressful.
01:12:38.000 At some point, you're just gonna have to take a big red F if you want to push it forward.
01:12:43.000 And here's the thing, too.
01:12:44.000 This is why you don't see it publicly.
01:12:46.000 We always say, well, how is it that it's so far left in the entertainment industry, in all of journalism, in all of academia?
01:12:54.000 You know why?
01:12:55.000 Yeah, it tends to lend itself.
01:12:56.000 And there have been proactive movements for leftists to go in there.
01:12:58.000 I'll give you that.
01:12:59.000 Absolutely.
01:13:00.000 And people have written about that.
01:13:01.000 Thomas Sowell's written about that.
01:13:02.000 Ben Shapiro's written about that as it relates to the entertainment industry.
01:13:04.000 You've heard some celebrities come out and speak up against it.
01:13:07.000 But you know what?
01:13:08.000 That's only one part of the equation.
01:13:10.000 Leftists can only go in and conquer it if you remain silent for so long.
01:13:14.000 And you don't see that.
01:13:16.000 That's why there's this disconnect.
01:13:17.000 You don't see it in the general populace.
01:13:19.000 The general populace...
01:13:20.000 The populist that elects presidents, you see them tired of political correctness.
01:13:24.000 At every dinner table across the country, on any given night, guess what?
01:13:28.000 You can see people saying, no, no, no, that's not true.
01:13:30.000 Well, just in case you speak out against the idea that you can change your biological sex, there's a brother or a cousin or a sister saying, no, I don't agree with that.
01:13:38.000 Or there's someone saying, hey, I find it really offensive for you to say that men and women are different.
01:13:42.000 There's a dad saying, don't be a dumbass.
01:13:44.000 And smacking his son on the back of the head.
01:13:46.000 This is occurring all across the country.
01:13:49.000 The only place it's not occurring is in positions of power because of cowardice.
01:13:54.000 And if nothing else this week, I hope that you see with Google, you see the ramifications.
01:13:58.000 People lose their jobs.
01:13:59.000 Lives get destroyed.
01:14:00.000 We're really blessed here because we've grown this.
01:14:03.000 We've created something that's been profitable enough for everyone to make a good living.
01:14:06.000 And we're able to continue doing this.
01:14:07.000 And if you join Mug Club, we can grow and employ more people.
01:14:10.000 And we are really grateful.
01:14:11.000 We consider ourselves very, very fortunate.
01:14:13.000 But there are a lot of other people out there who don't have it.
01:14:16.000 And just like Sarah Silverman and these comedians who got by Amy Schumer by being shocked comics and they closed the door behind them, you can't be a conservative, get your way into power by being quiet and then close the door behind you.
01:14:28.000 When someone's being run out at Google and 50% of you think it's wrong, You need to say something.
01:14:35.000 You can't be in the entertainment industry where James Cromwell comes out and says, you know what, we need to educate conservatives.
01:14:39.000 We need to put out more propaganda effectively.
01:14:42.000 You can't be a comedian and watch Chelsea Handler say, we need to make it illegal for people to find racist jokes funny.
01:14:47.000 At some point, you're no longer being polite.
01:14:51.000 You are just a spineless...
01:14:54.000 And I would love to see more people, specifically in instances like this, the next time a Google incident happens, or whatever develops here from the Google situation.
01:15:04.000 That 50%, hey, you know what, how about this?
01:15:06.000 How about 50% of that 50% speaks up?
01:15:10.000 We're doing the best we can.
01:15:11.000 And I know a lot of other people are out there.
01:15:13.000 But I know that they could use some reinforcements.
01:15:15.000 I know they could use some air support.
01:15:16.000 And guess what?
01:15:17.000 Right now the time is right.
01:15:18.000 Because you see it at the culture at large.
01:15:20.000 You just don't see it in those towers of power.
01:15:23.000 And I think the people out there who are watching, you know what I'm talking about.
01:15:26.000 I hope we see this come to fruition here in the next couple of months.
01:15:29.000 Because it really could be the defining moment in this country.
01:15:33.000 It's a winnable fight right now.
01:15:34.000 It's a really winnable fight.
01:15:36.000 You just have to stop being a coward.
01:15:38.000 Buck up.