Rasmussen Polling s head honcho Mark Mitchell is on the show today to talk about the possibility that some of the polls were colluding with the leftist smear campaign against Donald Trump. We also have an exclusive, Malcolm Undercover, a leaked email from NASA where they are afraid of Donald Trump and what will happen in our space program with Deidre Deid.
00:00:54.000Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad-free experience and exclusive content from Lotter with Crowder, Nick DiPaolo, Mr. Guns N' Gear, Donald Trump Jr., and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
00:02:14.000He'll be on the show today to talk about how some other pollsters may have actually been colluding Iowa.
00:02:20.000And we also have an exclusive, Malcolm Undercover, a leaked email from NASA. Today you'll see it for the very first time where they are very, over there at NASA, afraid of Donald Trump and what will happen in our space program with DEI. That's a real email.
00:02:39.000Russia, Ukraine, some stuff is going on.
00:02:41.000Some people are saying World War III. As a new development, did you know this, when we talk about this, that Putin has said, this is according to Reuters, he may be able to sit down and de-escalate and talk about a ceasefire, but only with Donald Trump.
00:02:54.000So let me ask you, do you think that that means Donald Trump is a puppet of Putin, or does Donald Trump deserve some credit if he helps us avoid World War III? Thank you very much.
00:03:06.000We also have a 7 plus 1 because David Hogg has hosted an actual conference asking young men what they want and trying to woo them back to the Democratic Party.
00:04:41.000It's not like Jay Varma locking you down while he's having sex parties, or the DOJ representative saying, yeah, we're simply trying to weaponize the DOJ against Donald Trump.
00:04:55.000So, this is an email that was sent to employees at the Johnson Space Center, and it included a section titled, What Trump's Second Term Could Mean for DEI. And I believe...
00:05:07.000And they're very concerned about DEI. They're very concerned about people being on the chopping block.
00:05:13.000They're very concerned that some people will be negatively affected.
00:05:15.000And actually, we can confirm, most heavily affected immediately were the promptly fired, not-so-hidden figures.
00:06:00.000Now, this is from the actual email circulating at NASA. In case you wondered, like, hey, we've told you this week, $500 billion a year lost in fraud.
00:06:11.000Now, I don't mean $500 billion a year maybe misspent or maybe over budget.
00:06:26.000When you take that into, and then you sort of cross-reference that with what you're about to hear being circulated from NASA, officially, off the record, I think.
00:06:35.000You go, oh, maybe the government's priorities aren't in the right place.
00:06:41.000They wrote, those who support the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion are rightly concerned about the impact of Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
00:06:55.000I love how they have to specify like which election in which year because they know how disengaged some of their career lackeys are.
00:07:11.000The backlash is from the American public because they cannot, I would imagine, comment below, can you imagine a place or think of a place where Where race or gender could be less relevant than NASA? What percentage should it enter into the equation?
00:07:33.000Let me ask you, if you're the one in the rocket going up, how much do you care about the melanin and the level of the skin to the guy or woman or Z hitting the button?
00:07:47.000The backlash, this is when you see all these emails, when you see all these statements, when you see these freakouts, they are freaking out against you.
00:07:58.000Even under the most pessimistic scenario, Many forms of DEI will remain lawful under a Trump presidency.
00:08:07.000DEI programs that do not confer a preference on legally protected groups are likely to remain legally safe for the foreseeable future, which means they are going to do everything they can to still try and implement DEI. By the way, something that's very important when you're talking about DEI, that also means doing away with performance metrics in the workplace.
00:10:58.000Wait, let's not promote the full letter being on social media and watch CNN. Yes, I didn't want to bring up CNN. Have you seen Gerald's favorite comedy, Oppenheimer?
00:11:45.000By the way, by the way, Sam from HR is actually glad that we brought Nazis into NASA, because he said that of all of his gripes with the Nazis, being disorganized was not chief amongst them.
00:11:54.000Write that one up, New York Post or Daily Mail.
00:12:03.000This is by definition an abusive work environment.
00:12:46.000We have an update on one of our stories that went viral on social media.
00:12:50.000For those of you who don't remember, last week we infiltrated a Zoom meeting for the Democrat activist group Blue Victory USA, and they had this post-election war room.
00:12:59.000So for those who don't remember, I'm going to roll this clip for you.
00:13:02.000It's difficult to understand what they're saying because they are incredibly inarticulate, but just do your best.
00:13:11.000And I still believe that, you know, what we're really experiencing right now is a very balkanized, selective recession, where certain regions of certain sectors are hammered.
00:13:23.000But the issue wasn't addressed that way in the national press.
00:13:26.000Like, for example, even in very high income areas, like my own in Silicon Valley, you know, 35-40% of the jobs have I could go to sleep in the last three years of very successive waves of layoffs.
00:13:40.000And a lot of these people were having very high income positions well into, you know, $200,000, $300,000 a year.
00:13:49.000But, you know, right now, they just kind of want to, like, you know, I think the party messed up in that they just wanted to constantly express, you know, broad metrics, right?
00:13:59.000Why is he in front of an early 90s food court?
00:14:01.000Even the Department of Labor relied on some of those payroll I mean, which that was later uncovered, that like 80,000 of these jobs that were created were flubbed.
00:14:13.000And so I think that in the deep underlying feeling of the electorate, they knew this was going on and they did not appreciate the Dems doing this, right?
00:14:25.000So the reason they were upset at the infiltration is because you see behind closed doors, they acknowledge, and by the way, these are, I mean, use the eyeball test, these are clearly dyed-in-the-wool leftist activists, you know, radical leftist progressives, you know, the Democratic Party.
00:14:38.000And they were saying, yeah, the numbers were not true, the employment numbers, and we weren't happy about the fact that, I get, you have to win an election, but these employment numbers, they were just fluffed up.
00:14:48.000I mean, these were puff pieces out there, and we knew it wasn't true.
00:14:52.000So they don't like you being in the other team's huddle.
00:14:54.000So on Monday, Blue Victory sent out an email to their members addressing the infiltration.
00:15:00.000It's kind of like Media Matters actually has a Rumble Premium membership just so they can...
00:15:05.000If he's linked his account, please link your account.
00:15:08.000So this is what Blue Victory sent out.
00:15:11.000They said, I wanted to warn you that last week's meeting was recorded by a troll and posted on X by Steven Crowder, who has a big following on social media.
00:15:19.000I have removed the troll account, but I don't think I have the ability to stop random people from recording the meetings and posting them anywhere.
00:15:40.000That's because you, what you do, your support.
00:15:42.000And by the way, if you see something, or you hear something, fraud, waste, abuse, corruption, funny stuff, like this, like a walking anime character, send your tip.
00:18:14.000So this is something I want to, and before we get to Mr. Mitchell of Rasmussen Reports and David Hogg, is it Rasmussen Reports or Rasmussen Polls?
00:18:23.000Because I know, I want to make sure that I get it right.
00:18:25.000But this guy is the head honcho over there.
00:18:40.000But let me tell you what I think is most interesting here, okay, is that Putin, according to Reuters, has said that he would be open to a ceasefire talk or de-escalations, but only if the conversation takes place with Donald Trump.
00:18:55.000So we'll go through what has led us to that point and what that means.
00:19:47.000Russia updated its nuclear doctrine after that, lowering the threshold for using nukes.
00:19:52.000Okay, so that's basically saying, like, we may, we may, look, we're changing this, we may be, and I wrote this on my biggest, my longest table.
00:21:04.000Ukrainian officials are saying it was an ICBM, and there's an unnamed Western official, is what it was just appearing on CNN, said it was not an ICBM that was launched.
00:21:14.000Well, that does matter because, let's say, if Ukraine is lying, then they're lying about something that would be a very serious escalation.
00:21:53.000But there was, we do know, some kind of a missile fired at Dnepra.
00:21:58.000Ukraine says that Russia fired an intercontinental ballistic missile at a central city in Ukraine.
00:22:04.000It'd be the first use of an ICBM in combat since its development in the Cold War.
00:22:08.000If it's confirmed, it shows that both sides are starting to up their tactics in the run-up to when Donald Trump is going to move into the White House.
00:22:21.000And I think that you are seeing an understanding that if there is going to be any kind of a conversation down the line about a ceasefire or some kind of broader settlement, each side wants to have the best possible negotiating position.
00:22:37.000They want to be in the strongest possible place.
00:22:39.000And just because it's really cool, here's a reported look at scary.
00:23:04.000Now, the reason that this is pivotal, and hopefully we can get some updates while we're here, because we don't know what's true.
00:23:12.000Two sides are giving us two different stories here, Ukraine and then the Western official.
00:23:16.000It would be unprecedented if it is, in fact, an ICBM, because this would be the first time that, basically, this has been developed as a technology to carry a nuclear payload.
00:23:26.000It can travel up to, I believe, 18,000 miles per hour.
00:23:32.000When they're coming down, good luck stopping that.
00:24:58.000So this brings us to what I think is very interesting here.
00:25:01.000here according to reuters i believe this uh this was released last evening and it was trending everywhere putin has said that he is open to peace negotiations but only with trump so um why is that so funny Because he's going to negotiate with Biden.
00:25:41.000It's very broad, so we'll have to know how this plays out.
00:25:44.000divide control of the four eastern regions, that Ukraine abandons all plans to join NATO.
00:25:49.000And then they're going to be asking, most likely, that Ukraine limits the size of their military.
00:25:56.000And they do want, again, this is all just sort of reportedly, they want to ensure unrestricted use of the Russian language in these areas of Ukraine, which, look, again, I feel like you always say, oh, don't absolutely despise Putin.
00:26:12.000But the fact is, that right there tells you, there are enough ethnic Russians in areas of Ukraine who, if they were living under the oppressive rule of punishment for language use, I know this because I was raised in Quebec.
00:26:26.000It's an English country, but in Quebec...
00:26:30.000They actually have the language police where you can be fined, your business can be shut down.
00:26:34.000If the French writing is not, I think it's now at 2.5 times the size of your English writing, even if you're in an English city with mostly English customers.
00:26:42.000Because I had one mom born, sorry, one parent born, not two moms.
00:27:38.000And that compromise is where you just have to pick the compromise that you're willing to live with.
00:27:44.000And the issue here is Ukraine has been turning down compromise after compromise.
00:27:50.000But they basically said no compromise whatsoever.
00:27:53.000I'm not saying the offers that have been made are necessarily legitimate or one that should be taken.
00:27:57.000But Ukraine has made it quite clear they won't take any.
00:27:59.000And why would you if you have a never-ending supply of funding?
00:28:02.000That does not create a scenario for peaceful talks, and maybe that's why Zelensky said that he actually believes that Donald Trump could help end the war.
00:28:13.000I believe that the war will end, and it will not end in the abstract, but there's no exact date.
00:28:19.000However, the war will end faster with the policy of this team that will now lead the White House.
00:28:25.000This is their approach, their promise to their society, and it is also very important to them.
00:28:58.000Well, they don't have to say anything.
00:29:00.000An unnamed Western source already said, no, it was not ICBM. Do not worry.
00:29:06.000No, I really don't know what to believe on that, other than I would believe the reporting initially and say, okay, well, okay, if Russia's not denying it, then maybe it really was.
00:29:56.000We beat them when we weren't even a part of the nation.
00:29:57.000Anyway, so nonetheless, I understand that people want that, but that's not what...
00:30:02.000I'm sorry to say that, but that is not where we are.
00:30:05.000And it's not like we haven't had these ethnic groups in other countries get kind of tied into a country after some kind of a conflict in the past.
00:30:12.000This has happened multiple times, a lot of times in Europe.
00:30:57.000Now, for all of Putin's flaws, and there are many flaws, He does revile a lot of the West for the same reason that the West reviles Putin.
00:31:08.000So here's what I think really bothers him, and he's communicated this a few times, where people go, hey, this is a guy, all of his financial gain is ill-gotten, right?
00:31:16.000You don't become a billionaire like that when your people are still oppressed.
00:31:25.000So he doesn't have a problem with, I should say, I don't think he's as bothered by being accused of corruption where he goes, yeah, but you're basically oligarchs in the West too.
00:32:52.000Keep in mind, they said that Donald Trump was going to bring us World War III. Those same people will then condemn Donald Trump for effectively avoiding World War III in a way that the Democrat establishment couldn't.
00:33:13.000Now, there have been some people that have gone over to Russia and have done a very bad job of representing the United States interests, and they've looked like a little bit of a puppet for Russia in some ways.
00:33:20.000But they were called a puppet before they went.
00:34:22.000He may have been bombastic, people didn't like to work with him, but he was right about communists and communist sympathizers infiltrating our institutions, largely media, Hollywood, and education.
00:34:58.000Imagine Donald Trump comes in, this guy who's the dictator, this guy who's going to destroy democracy, and he ends a conflict.
00:35:05.000And saves Americans hundreds of billions of dollars.
00:35:07.000They've got to find a way to vilify him.
00:35:09.000It must be that him and Putin are hand in hand.
00:35:12.000And we're only able to talk about this, by the way, because we're not beholden to YouTube.
00:35:16.000We're not beholden to the advertisers there who force you to push the Ukraine talking points or the free and fair election talking points, which we'll get to with Mr. Mitchell as it relates to Rasmussen.
00:35:32.000Rumble Premium is Mug Club, where you get everything on Rumble Premium, including the whole ad-free experience for $99 annually or $9.99 a month.
00:36:06.000Let's get off the tip jars and let's get everyone on the same side here because I'm telling you, the left is absolutely regrouping and it's going to get ugly.
00:36:14.000Yeah, fun fact, the British are the ones that built the subways that Tucker was exploring.
00:36:21.000The Russians brought in the British and said, could you help us design this fantastic subway?
00:36:25.000And then they're like, look at what we did!
00:36:30.000It's really hard to navigate this because you have to walk around the giant tables all the time.
00:36:54.000So, okay, before I get to that, there was an opinion piece on USA Today titled, Gen Z voters were the biggest disappointment of the election.
00:38:06.000So, to save the day, coming in riding on his...
00:38:10.000Gender-neutral horses, David Hogg, and he tweeted out or X'd out, today I'm meeting with a group of researchers and activists to discuss how Democrats win back young men.
00:38:55.000And by the way, this tells you that, of course, if a young man who was the face of the Democratic Party, and of course, was he Sandy Hook or Newtown?
00:39:08.000If someone who has been seen as the face of the youth movement for the Democrats cannot understand why other people his age broke in record numbers for a Republican, that tells you that...
00:39:19.000The Democrat Party, it's not listening.
00:39:21.000And it's not only not listening, they are proactively cutting out young men.
00:39:46.000Just a young person does not equal a young demo.
00:39:49.000David Hogg is more out of touch with young male voters than Jon Stewart, who, by the way, has had better demo numbers than Trevor Noah, than Stephen Colbert.
00:40:40.000You have borne the brunt, other than economically, of all of the bad DEI policies, of all of the shut up and sit down, of all of the Me Too crap because you're a kid and you're going on a date with a girl at 17 and you're like...
00:40:52.000I don't know if something's going to happen.
00:40:55.000You've got these kids basically just having to deal with all of this crap, and now they have alternative media.
00:41:01.000They're not going to the mainstream news outlets.
00:41:12.000So, David Hogg, and comment below if you think it's all that complicated as far as what young men want.
00:41:18.000David Hogg needs a focus group to help him out, and that's why we actually have David Hogg's What Young Men Want focus group, the 7 Plus 1 Most Heard Answers.
00:41:28.000This week's 7 Plus 1. You'll forgot to find in the chamber!
00:42:22.000David, maybe you'd understand this better if you cosplay as a submissive cuck dominated by a strong female figure and I cosplay as the guy who leaves you tied up and goes to Hooters.
00:43:47.000Before we get to Mr. Mitchell of Rasmussen, Wednesday, this Texas Democratic representative, so Jasmine Crockett, went on not just a racist tirade, but a very dumb one.
00:44:07.000It's because you can then misuse words like oppression.
00:44:10.000There has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
00:44:14.000You tell me which white men were dragged out of their homes.
00:44:19.000You tell me which one of them got dragged all the way across an ocean and told that you are going to go and work.
00:44:52.000That it is white men on this side of the aisle telling us, people of color on this side of the aisle, that y'all are the ones being oppressed.
00:45:02.000That y'all are the ones that are being harmed.
00:45:05.000Well, for starters, I think the white men there understand that if they yelled at you the way you yelled at them, they would be charged with a hate crime.
00:45:13.000So, we're talking about today, and your behavior is, well, let's just put it this way.
00:45:21.000Also, you're a stupid person, because you don't seem to understand the fact that the United States is not uniquely responsible for creating slavery.
00:45:28.000We didn't invent it, and we didn't steal people.
00:45:40.000We're sent to the New World, already enslaved by Africans and sold to European traders.
00:45:44.000So if you want to take it up with someone, like, in other words, before evil Westerners who ended slavery, if early on in this timeline you went back, they would have said, good, oh good, more slaves.
00:45:56.000That would have been the reaction in the homeland that you talk about being stolen from.
00:46:05.000But to act as though you were stolen from a peaceful life, you of course not, but I mean even your ancestors is simply inaccurate.
00:46:11.000And by the way, just so you have the number, 90%, that means that Africans themselves had already enslaved and traded around 11 million slaves.
00:46:21.000And you may not know this, but over a million Europeans were actually enslaved off the Mediterranean coast largely as part of the North African slave trade.
00:46:29.000That's why a lot of these towns are built up with defensive walls.
00:46:41.000According to Herbert L. Byrd Jr., who's a black man, the Irish preceded Africans as slaves in the New World, meaning the Irish were slaves before.
00:46:53.000In fact, we didn't say African Americans.
00:46:55.000We didn't have the same little respect.
00:46:56.000They were enslaved before black people in this country.
00:49:37.000So Kroc, alright, you can expect more of that grandstanding.
00:49:40.000And now it is time to actually get to our guest.
00:49:43.000But before that, look, let me just set this up for you, okay, for people who don't know.
00:49:47.000There were some big misses in this polling cycle, the polling in this election.
00:49:52.000Because remember, the conversation was, well, there was a secret Trump voter, and then even though, you know, allegedly Donald Trump lost in 2020, he still outperformed the polls by significant margin.
00:50:01.000So the pollsters got a lot of that wrong.
00:50:03.000And the question before this election was, well, are they going to get it wrong with Donald Trump a third time?
00:50:26.000And all along the trail, Morning Consult, which I believe is highly rated by a lot of these other pollsters, sort of aggregates, they had these outlying polls of Kamala Harris winning.
00:51:44.000What did he try and accuse you of or suggest?
00:51:48.000Yeah, let me just talk about accuracy first.
00:51:51.000We're at 1.7 points in the national popular vote.
00:51:53.000We've been putting out for weeks and weeks and weeks that the race was two points, and everybody measures their own accuracy with their final call.
00:51:59.000But we were all alone in August and September when the pollsters were at peak lying, peak psychological operation to create a fake lead for Kamala Harris.
00:52:09.000What was different this time, the pollsters actually weren't as bad as they were before and it's because I decided to be a loudmouth back in July and August and call all these people liars and they didn't take it well.
00:52:20.000So you got Nate and you got FiveThirtyEight.
00:52:22.000They're actually two separate entities now.
00:52:24.000FiveThirtyEight kicked us out because of ideological reasons a year ago.
00:52:30.000Is FiveThirtyEight now, is it under the ABC umbrella or is Nate under the ABC umbrella?
00:52:35.000So Nate now has a little newsletter he puts out, and it's basically the same numbers, and 538's ABC News, Disney, and quite frankly, they're probably on the chopping block right now, because it looks like all of a sudden on ABC, it's no bueno to talk bad about people in the Trump circle, and literally, they're ideologues.
00:53:11.000So yeah, these people were basically shilling for Democrats and Nate's no different because real clear politics just takes all the polling and puts it into an average and reports it.
00:54:11.000There are accurate independent pollsters and everybody else that shills for Democrats.
00:54:14.000Nate put this piece out in the New York Times, the same New York Times, by the way, that a week before Election Day attacked RealClearPolitics.
00:54:22.000That's like attacking the Pope in the industry.
00:54:25.000And he talked about how the pollsters did better this time.
00:54:29.000Well, yeah, because I was shaming them into trying to save their own credibility.
00:54:33.000And he didn't mention us at all about accuracy.
00:54:36.000And then when he did mention us, he said, oh, well, there's these right-wing pollsters that were caught coordinating with the Trump campaign.
00:55:09.000So it was basically just the most ridiculous thing.
00:55:12.000And, you know, so I decided not to take it.
00:55:15.000Can I ask you, beyond being 16 points off, which is almost embarrassing for Seltzer, do you have any other anything else that would suggest that she actually did actively maybe collude or was in communication with the DNC? That's the problem with the industry is that it's impossible to know for sure.
00:55:36.000There's no matter of transparency that can make up for unethical or lying pollsters.
00:56:04.000And so even there alone is enough to say, well, there's an ideological reason she probably suppressed those results.
00:56:11.000And we know she was, I mean, the Iowa poll she put out that was Harris Plus 3. The whole internet was buzzing about it for two weeks.
00:56:17.000I mean, everybody was chuckling about this poll that was coming that was going to save Kamala Harris and show that the polls were Underemphasizing their support.
00:56:26.000When a poll is the number one trending thing on Twitter, like, there's a problem.
00:56:32.000And when you look at, you combine it with the fact that, I don't know if you're as aware of this, but after the election, when Donald Trump won, Leftists and a lot of independent creators on YouTube, they saw a massive drop in their subscriptions, right?
00:57:18.000One of the major stories, I think, from this whole election was how completely ideologically different people who watch CNN and MSNBC are from just, say, Fox News and Newsmax viewers.
00:57:28.000They had totally different issue sets.
00:57:30.000The number one issue of MSNBC viewers was protecting democracy.
00:57:36.000And those are basically like, oh, Trump's going to take this away from you, whereas the prices and the border really are things that Biden did take away from people.
00:57:45.000So they're just literally tapped into this fear of missing out, and that's what they were trying to do.
00:57:51.000Listen, Kamala Harris was never trying to change any voters' minds.
00:57:53.000They were just trying to bully people into social proof to follow the movement.
00:58:03.000You know, she was running, you know, the campaign of 15, 20 years ago, and the people don't want Barack Obama anymore because they hate the government.
00:58:26.000We have an undercover unit, so we've really expanded the operations here.
00:58:29.000And on election night, You know, we wanted to make sure that we had all the data that anyone else had at CNN, at Fox News, you know, AP, all the stuff, Reuters, AP News, why are we paid for all of it?
00:58:39.000So this is a big undertaking, cost us millions of dollars.
00:58:41.000And so we had access to analytics in real time.
00:58:43.000And so it mirrors what you experienced quite a bit because I think you said they left you out of some of their articles as far as including pollsters.
00:58:50.000Well, the same thing if you look at actually a lot of these articles afterwards about numbers on election night.
00:58:57.000Number one with a bullet was actually this program.
00:58:58.000It wasn't even close, and certainly as far as ours watched.
00:59:01.000But more importantly, we were doing this for the first time, and we made calls 75. For example, this was the first place here to call Georgia.
00:59:10.000We called Georgia and the change and the margin at which it would end.
00:59:14.000So we didn't do any polls beforehand, but that night, and I'd like to show you a clip of what happened that night, and then talk about how it mirrors what you've been going through with the blackouts of coverage.
00:59:36.000We're doing the opposite of Brett Baer because we're looking at some trends that we see that I know legacy media sees, but they're too nutless to make the call.
00:59:44.000Guys, you're supposed to include the number in there where we said it was a three-something percent, but we predicted it was going to close between 2 and 2.5.
00:59:52.000So we said this is actually where it will close.
00:59:59.000How much of this do you think is ideologically motivated versus maybe these people also just suck at their job?
01:00:08.000A little column A, a little column B. I think there's so many different levers in which, like, bias and lying can be inserted.
01:00:14.000You could put out a perfectly good poll and then have a lying mainstream media cherry-pick your results like The Hill did with Fairleigh Dickinson University.
01:00:21.000Or, like, I think in New York Times' case, they have a good pollster, but he reports up, I think, to a flaming leftist managing editor that will not let him put out things positive to Trump.
01:00:32.000I think it really comes down to it's the status quo and they can't stand a non-status quo candidate and they have to array against them.
01:00:39.000And quite frankly, I'm surprised the polling was as good as it was.
01:00:41.000You mentioned like some of these people weren't in consult.
01:00:50.000And luckily, when they picked Harris, I said, you know what, they're going to lie a lot.
01:00:54.000And we did something we never did before.
01:00:55.000We started putting out daily results in the middle of July.
01:00:59.000And because of that, I can tell you the race did not change.
01:01:03.000This wasn't like a 2016 where people don't know the candidates and stuff gets dropped left and right.
01:01:08.000There was not a single thing that moved the numbers, not Trump getting shot, not even the debate.
01:01:12.000And so just to see these massive shifts to the left and then be able to go in and look at the polling results and the crosstabs, And say, oh, it's because they're definitely oversampling Trump deranged Republicans and they're not getting independent.
01:01:24.000The number one issue among independents is abortion.
01:01:28.000So they create the world that they want to see.
01:01:31.000And they, again, got clowned by Listen, we have a super small team.
01:01:36.000Morning Consult's got hundreds of millions of revenue, and we put out almost as much polling as them, and their polling is just absolutely ridiculous.
01:01:43.000Like you said, I mean, we were saying Trump was going to win comfortably in July and August.
01:01:48.000We were the first ones saying that Trump would win the national popular vote because our polling said it the whole time.
01:02:09.000Do you think that considering the shellacking that the left has taken, do you expect them to correct it all if only out of self-preservation where they go, okay, we can't just bury our head in the sand.
01:02:19.000We've been wrong three major election cycles.
01:02:21.000The midterms there were an outlier because of COVID and all the stuff that had kind of happened.
01:02:25.000We need to get this right because we're doing nobody any favors by giving them a false sense of confidence.
01:02:31.000Do you think they'll course correct or do you think they're going to continue smashing their wiener in the door?
01:02:37.000The theme of the next four years is because they're all flaming ideologues.
01:02:41.000Not all of them, but every single one of these companies has problems.
01:03:47.000What's great about it is the Trump picks that we're just putting out, pulling out today, like 81% of Republicans rate Trump excellent or good in the pick, 83%.