00:03:35.000You're going to see that probably next week.
00:03:38.000Maybe this week we actually apprehended some, well, MS-13 gang members, child, what do we have to say, corn if it's this is on YouTube, cornographers.
00:05:06.000Military intervention of a crazy Islamic death cult regime and how to deal with them would be one of those.
00:05:14.000Like your mind can be changed on some of these issues because militarily, right, it's largely a strategic decision.
00:05:19.000My mind's not going to be changed on abortion.
00:05:21.000My mind's not going to be changed on transitioning kids.
00:05:22.000My mind's not going to be changed on the Second Amendment.
00:05:24.000But there is information that we can't know as it relates to national security where sometimes you go, oh, all right, that seems like an opportune time.
00:05:32.000That seems strategically like it could save us money or save lives in the long run.
00:05:38.000But to throw out this entire administration, which I see some people doing, look, it doesn't make you a cheerleader to say, do you understand that we could be facing, we were, and we could be right there again, a demographic shift in this country where it ceases to exist?
00:05:54.000Is this the hill that people want to die on with a purity test on who is MAGA?
00:07:25.000You clearly do not understand the simple principle of fluid dynamics, Josephine.
00:07:31.000It is either the product or the end user, and that toilet is a stellar product, which is why I'm inclined to believe that you, Josephine, are at fault.
00:07:44.000That toilet can take a punch, but what you do in there is illegal in 47 states.
00:09:39.000Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad-free experience and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
00:10:29.000Glad to be with you and not in the back of an ice car.
00:11:06.000What is your opinion on this situation?
00:11:07.000And does it make you view MAGA, America First, differently?
00:11:11.000Because I'll tell you what, there are reasons for there to be sort of an internal civil war, if you will, within the conservative movement.
00:16:00.000Well, yesterday, the Supreme Court actually said that California schools can't help conceal students who are trying to transition and identify with some made-up new gender.
00:16:12.000The U.S. Supreme Court just cleared the way for California schools to tell parents if their children identify as transgender without getting the students' approval.
00:16:21.000The process is known as parental notification.
00:16:24.000For now, the high court's discussion is a state law that bans automatic parental notification requirements if students change their pronouns or gender expression at school.
00:16:33.000Religious parents and educators challenge the law, but the state argued that students have the right to privacy about their gender expression, especially if they fear rejection from their families.
00:16:44.000The high court sided with the parents and reinstated a lower court order while this case continues to play out.
00:17:28.000By the way, a lot of their sexual activity.
00:17:31.000I know this kid's under this age, they can't consent to sex, but apparently they can consent to hormone therapy or gender transition that would forever ruin their potential sex life.
00:17:41.000So the Supreme Court ruled, hey, you have basic rights as a parent.
00:17:43.000You know the ones that you've always had?
00:17:45.000Dissenting judges Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson.
00:18:26.000These are the kinds of teachers, those in higher education, those in public education, who are teaching your children about modern gender theory.
00:18:34.000One lady, Madeline Mann, she is at UC San Francisco.
00:18:38.000She's the associate director for clinical and translational science, workforce development, and consultation services.
00:18:44.000Here is her being confronted by somebody who doesn't believe that children should be genitally mutilated or chemically castrated.
00:18:52.000This lady, who works in higher education, being confronted and threatening to find, to hunt down and kill a mom with an opposing opinion.
00:25:16.000But they completely masked what you said.
00:25:19.000Speaking of which, look, let's get to Iran.
00:25:24.000And sometimes there's value in having the perspective of being offline for a little bit because we were in the back of an ice paddy wagon yesterday, Tool Man and I.
00:25:33.000And we'll kind of share that ride along with you and hopefully do right by those ICE agents because they're doing a bang-up job and they're being vilified for things that they don't do and they're not being very smooth yesterday.
00:26:54.000But I was seeing obviously the news with Iran.
00:26:58.000I was glued to the news this weekend and then kind of checked back in.
00:27:03.000And it was amazing to see some of the narratives shift and to see the infighting.
00:27:08.000And you guys let me know if you think that this is one of those subjects where I think it's fair for people to have disagreements and it is not a disqualifying factor.
00:27:17.000What I mean by that is if someone believes in transitioning children, I'm not going to try and find common ground with them on anything because I believe it's evil.
00:27:25.000If someone believes in stripping you of your Second Amendment rights wholesale, I'm not going to find any common ground with them because I believe that that's evil.
00:27:32.000I don't believe that someone who thinks we should not intervene at all in Iran, I don't believe that's an evil stance.
00:27:39.000And I don't believe that someone's saying there is an opportune moment right now, there's a moment in time where we can take out their leadership and mitigate a threat.
00:27:50.000We'll go through the objectives and we'll go through the bad communications from this administration as well as the propaganda that you see online.
00:27:56.000So first, I think it's important to set this context.
00:27:59.000The objectives for this military operation have been laid out.
00:28:26.000I thought that was really, really well handled.
00:28:28.000Then I saw that the White House communications team decided to cut out the clip or a clip that would present it as out of context as possible.
00:28:43.000And then I want to show you more contextual answers and ask you before we move on with a claim truth fact check if it changes your opinion or perspective.
00:28:53.000Here's what they put out: woefully handled.
00:28:57.000The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran's short-range ballistic missiles and the threat posed by their Navy, particularly to naval assets.
00:29:07.000That is what it is focused on doing right now, and it's doing quite successfully.
00:29:10.000I'll leave it to the Pentagon and the Department of War to discuss the tactics behind that and the progress that's being made.
00:29:16.000That is the clear objective of this mission.
00:29:18.000The second question that I've been asked is, why now?
00:29:22.000The first is it was abundantly clear that if Iran came under attack by anyone, the United States or Israel or anyone, they were going to respond and respond against the United States.
00:29:32.000The orders had been delegated down to the field commanders.
00:29:35.000It was automatic, and in fact, it bared to be true because, in fact, within an hour of the initial attack on the leadership compound, the missile forces in the south and in the north, for that matter, had already been activated to launch.
00:29:49.000In fact, those had already been pre-positioned.
00:29:52.000The third is the assessment that was made that if we stood and waited for that attack to come first before we hit them, we would suffer much higher casualties.
00:30:01.000And so, the president made the very wise decision.
00:30:04.000We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action.
00:30:06.000We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces.
00:30:10.000And we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties and perhaps even higher those killed.
00:30:18.000And then we would all be here answering questions about why we knew that and didn't happen.
00:30:22.000Now, there's been criticism based on that clip, and rightfully so.
00:30:25.000Going, oh, so basically, they're not our friends, Israel, and they forced our hand.
00:30:29.000We shouldn't be going to war on behalf of any other nation.
00:30:40.000I also think that we need to walk through that logically and go: look, if we're America, I don't think that we should be sending Israel, whatever it is, three to four billion dollars a year.
00:30:47.000I think that Israel can handle themselves.
00:30:48.000I think there are many different vested interests in Iran not getting to the point of being a nuclear power and, frankly, being neutered.
00:30:55.000But that video shared, it reflected a position of, well, Israel was going to do it, so we had to jump in.
00:31:03.000Across the board, you can bring up the collage.
00:31:10.000I more so agree with the fact that I can't believe that that is the sole clip or the primary clip that was shared from this White House.
00:31:17.000So your criticism, by the way, of course, echoed by a lot of people out there, like Senator Mark Warner from Virginia Democrat, jumped at the opportunity to use that and smear the Trump administration.
00:32:52.000And by the way, those who are misrepresenting, I guess I should say the premise here, are in complete agreement with the left and Democrats.
00:33:00.000I would agree with the conclusion if the premise was correct with Warner.
00:33:12.000If you could be convinced that Iran, and not just a nuclear Iran, but an Iran that could be, for example, immune and defend their capability of building up nuclear weapons with very clear intent as to how they would use them.
00:33:30.000If you believe that that was, obviously and eventually a threat to the United States, and they were en route to that right now, if you believe there was a threat to the United States, maybe not now, maybe a year, maybe a year and a half from now, but that was set in stone, not to Israel, to the United States, would that change your opinion on a military operation?
00:33:53.000If Iran was a threat to the United States.
00:33:55.000We'll get to whether they're a threat to the United States or not.
00:33:58.000The important part is Rubio made very clear as to why, how, and when Iran would present not as a threat to Israel, but the United States, period.
00:34:13.000The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability.
00:34:16.000Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability?
00:34:19.000What they are trying to do and have been trying to do for a very long time is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind.
00:34:28.000Meaning, there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and it can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program.
00:34:37.000That is what they were trying to do, is put themselves in a place of immunity where the damage they can inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions.
00:34:48.000They are producing, by some estimates, over 100 of these missiles a month.
00:34:53.000Compare that to the six or seven interceptors that can be built a month.
00:34:56.000They can build 100 of these a month, not to mention the thousands of one-way attack drones that they also have.
00:35:02.000They've been doing this for a very long time.
00:35:03.000And by the way, they've been doing it under sanction.
00:35:06.000You see the attacks they're conducting right now?
00:35:45.000But this operation needed to happen because Iran in about a year or a year and a half would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it because they could hold the whole world hostage.
00:36:03.000Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it.
00:36:09.000But this had to happen no matter what.
00:36:29.000Okay, let me give you sort of an analogy.
00:36:32.000If you knew that that was happening and they were building up, basically, their own system of laws, basically a black market, an entire apartment complex of MS-13 members in Aurora, Colorado.
00:36:46.000If you knew that their eventual goal was 100 or 200 to take over a municipality and you were at five, would you stop it there?
00:36:55.000Or would you rather face them when there's 100 or 200?
00:37:02.000But these are the kinds of decisions that have been made militarily for a very, very long time.
00:37:06.000And if it seems like I'm always more hesitant or reticent to express an opinion, for example, before the strike on the uranium enrichment facility, yeah, you're right.
00:37:17.000And the reason why is because there's information that I don't know and I know I can't know.
00:37:23.000I would rather that Israel do it, but I understand the bunker busters.
00:37:26.000Now, if someone came to me and said, we have the ability to carry out that strike with no loss of life and be over the ocean before anyone wakes up, I would say, well, yeah, okay, I get it.
00:37:37.000Same thing with this type of operation right now.
00:37:39.000If someone were to say, hey, look, there is an opportune moment where we can have the Ayatollah and the next top-in-line ranked commanders, two through 75, and they're all going to be in the same spot, and we can take them all out at once.
00:37:53.000And there's a small moment, I would go, you know what?
00:38:12.000Opinion, my moral worldview will never be changed on the value of life, abortion, transitioning children, the Second Amendment, the First Amendment.
00:38:21.000But military decisions that require closed group meetings, they're primarily based on, okay, level of threat, opportunity, and then mitigating any loss of life or resources.
00:38:38.000That's how decisions like that are made.
00:38:41.000That's where I think this discussion needs to take place.
00:38:44.000And we're going to go through, by the way, some myths out there, some claims versus truths.
00:38:49.000I think it's very important to note that Iran would be the first nation ever, ever in the history of the world to be at 60% enrichment, really to be at 40% enrichment and not build a nuclear weapon.
00:39:00.000So if we all start with Iran, we'll build a nuclear weapon if left unchecked.
00:39:12.000Well, I think that if you believe you need to intervene, you go level of threat, even if it's eventual, when's the best opportunity to mitigate loss of life and resources?
00:41:15.000And one of the primary benefactors, you could say, here is definitely the United States.
00:41:20.000Iran has had a problem with the United States going back, I mean, as long as we can remember, but certainly starting 79, where they declared war and they've redeclared war against the United States, killed thousands of service members in many of our bases with no intention to stop.
00:41:37.000The myth here, the claim that is false, is that only the Jews would have an interest.
00:41:43.000Well, you may not say that these interests warrant the action, but to say that there aren't other interests outside of Israel is disingenuine, in my opinion.
00:41:55.000Well, you know, even if it's not just Israel's interests, but even if it was saying that, saying that these American soldiers are dying for Israel, you don't get to say that.
00:42:04.000I mean, you do get to have an opinion, sure, but you don't get to decide what these soldiers are dying for.
00:42:08.000Only the person who raises their right hand has the ability to decide what they're dying for.
00:42:12.000They die with that flag on their shoulder.
00:42:14.000They're going to have a flag in their casket.
00:42:34.000I understand the concept of it, and I'm against that.
00:42:36.000But if you could pull the military, guarantee you would see overwhelming support because they've known and had to deal with Iran for a very long time.
00:42:43.000We'll see with recruiting numbers here in the next quarter.
00:42:45.000It'll be a great indication of how people feel.
00:42:48.000Yeah, we'll see if recruitment numbers go up in dealing with the Ayatollah, with the camping out at respawn kill, or if it did better with two mommies and transition surgery and stretchy maternity suits for female pilots.
00:43:02.000We'll see which one appeals to those who you want in the military.
00:43:04.000Next claim that I see made out there is that President Trump betrayed his base.
00:43:27.000I think the president has gotten very poor counsel, and I do think it matters politically that he was the no more endless wars candidate in 2016 and 2024, particularly.
00:43:37.000And this looks like an open betrayal of the base.
00:43:39.000And even right now, Donald Trump barely has majority support of his own base.
00:44:06.000Well, look, if we actually had an America-first foreign policy, which means not in the hands of Miriam Adelson and the Zionist lobby, if we actually had that, NetNow couldn't do anything about it.
00:44:24.000Because Israel, with its 8 to 10 million people, cannot fight Iran with its 100 million people.
00:44:59.000I will tell you this, before I get to the truth.
00:45:02.000If this is what it looks like, not everything is comparable to Iraq.
00:45:07.000If it looks like Venezuela, if it looks like the Iranian enrichment facilities, if it looks like the first day or two that we saw with Ayatollah through rank 75 can be taken out in swift order, it's one of those areas where I'm going to trust the president's judgment because I think there are a lot of people, a lot of bad actors around the world going, you can just do stuff?
00:45:29.000Yeah, I think it's great for other world leaders to look at this and remember that it could be you at any time.
00:45:58.000Here's one from 1980, where before President Trump knew that he would ever run for the presidency, he was expressing the idea of America first and how Iran needs to be turned into an example for the sake of America.
00:46:14.000You may not agree, but you can't say that he's changed his mind.
00:46:18.000When you get the respect of the other countries, then the other countries tend to do a little bit as you do, and you can create the right attitudes.
00:46:26.000The Iranian situation is a case in point.
00:46:29.000That they hold our hostages is just absolutely and totally ridiculous.
00:46:36.000That this country sits back and allows a country such as Iran to hold our hostages, to my way of thinking, is a horror.
00:46:46.000And I don't think they'd do it with other countries.
00:46:49.000I honestly don't think they'd do it with other countries.
00:46:51.000Obviously, you're advocating that we should have gone in there with troops, et cetera, and brought our boys out.
00:47:40.000Is it consistent with the make America great, America first values?
00:47:44.000Well, remember that famous escalator ride in 2015?
00:47:47.000That famous video, that famous image took that escalator down and in that very first speech reiterated his sentiments from 1980, from 2004, from 2011.
00:47:59.000You may not agree with him, but he's not a traitor.
00:48:03.000I will stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, and we won't be using a man like Secretary Kerry that has absolutely no concept of negotiation, who's making a horrible and laughable deal, who's just being tapped along as they make weapons right now, and then goes into a bicycle race at 72 years old and closes and rakes his leg.
00:48:50.000Wherever you line up, can you honestly sit there and say that Donald Trump is a traitor?
00:48:56.000Can you honestly say that his stance on Iran, and I know people will pull up some tweets where they'll say Donald Trump said that Barack Obama would attack Iran because he was saying that Barack Obama had no balls and so ultimately he wasn't able to handle negotiations.
00:49:11.000He was trying to say that he knew how to do the art of the, we have statement after how far we have very few people, by the way, on earth, on earth, who we could point to and say has been that consistent on any issue.
00:49:25.000We're just fortunate that he was a public figure pre-social media where we have his opinion on Iran in 1980.
00:49:31.000You want to impeach him or you want to vote left or stay home during midterms because you think it's that big of a betrayal?
00:49:37.000That really is the question, regardless of your stance on Iran.
00:50:41.000I know that your, I know that, I know your boomer grandmother or mother might actually have her meme forwarding office as though it's a part-time job.
00:51:34.000China is a major threat as it relates to AI, as it relates to manufacturing.
00:51:37.000You think that the leverage of nukes helps?
00:51:41.000Do you think that, by the way, this is all part of the same problem?
00:51:44.000The Democrats' never-ending pledge to fund the war between Russia and Ukraine, which I am against, by the way.
00:51:50.000But do you think that Russia is less likely to come to the table and negotiate because they have nukes?
00:51:55.000The whole point here is Iran did not have nukes, but they were on their way.
00:52:00.000So we wanted to avoid specifically another China or a Russia with a much more, and I know this is crazy, I'm saying unstable nation because it wasn't even run by a president, even if it's a dictator who's installed as a president or a prime minister, but basically second in command to God for this sect of Islam, the Ayatollah.
00:53:58.000We were about a year to a year and a half away from not being able to stop them at all.
00:54:03.000In other words, to get to the point where they could build the nukes completely unfettered, where we wouldn't be able to do anything with short-range missiles, with one-way attack drones.
00:54:11.000They were about a year to a year and a half away from that, where we would no longer be able to negotiate with them because we'd have no leverage.
00:54:20.000And to be clear on that, we talked about this yesterday, but when they do operations orders and plan a mission, they take into account how many casualties they expect to lose.
00:54:27.000So it would be something we could do something about, but it would probably be over that threshold.
00:55:43.000I get some of them are executive orders, but you're going to say that this is nothing because you're making the case that there should be no MAGA, there should be no America First, there should be no conservative movement in this country that Iran warrants the evaporation of it, because that's what we're facing, to be clear.
00:56:02.000I'm saying that I think we can have disagreements on this, and we still don't want to hand this country over to the left.
00:56:08.000This goes to the next claim that is very, very lazy.
00:56:34.000First off, a lot of those images are from blue cities.
00:56:37.000When I see people on the right using these talking points, I'm just hit truth because I'm going to go along with a whole bunch of things that I was going to say.
00:57:17.000You do realize $140 to $450 billion a year, illegal immigrants cost taxpayers, $500 billion a year in fraud.
00:57:28.000You guys understand, like, these things need to be dealt with.
00:57:30.000We are not even close to a drop in that bucket when we're talking about the military.
00:57:33.000Here's the other truth that's really important.
00:57:35.000Okay, for the same reason that everyone in the DNC and people like Dave Smith and Tucker Carlson are wrong when they say this is an illegal war, they're wrong.
00:57:46.000The president on issues of foreign policy, the president is as close to, is not, but as close to basically a monarch as you get in this country.
00:57:56.000Yeah, he can bomb any insane dictator that he wants, to be clear.
00:58:17.000The president is more of a figurehead, to be clear.
00:58:21.000It largely rests with the legislative.
00:58:23.000On the domestic issues, he has to deal with mayors and sanctuary cities and governors not cooperating with ICE.
00:58:30.000And governors also protecting illegal aliens.
00:58:33.000Then it has, how many times have you seen something?
00:58:35.000Go through the courts, local courts, all the way up to the Supreme Court.
00:58:39.000There are all kinds of mechanisms to create gridlock.
00:58:43.000What this proves is that when an administration is free to carry out an action unilaterally, it's far more effective.
00:58:53.000Iran enrichment facilities, Venezuela, even what we are seeing right now, if you disagree with it.
00:59:00.000Foreign policy, president has a lot of authority.
00:59:04.000Domestic issues, unless you completely want to do away with states' rights, because you'd have to go in and basically destroy blue cities, which I'm not completely against, then you understand why this meme is silly and it's stupid.
00:59:18.000It's like, well, this thing isn't perfect, so then we don't give credit for this thing.
00:59:51.000What's happening on a day-to-day basis?
00:59:53.000In other words, we could spend a smaller percentage on a day-to-day basis at war in our defense budget than while we remain effectively idle.
01:00:04.000So to act like that somehow has anything to do with mayors and governors in Minneapolis, Minnesota blocking presidential authority is to play into the hands of the left, along with saying that Donald Trump betrayed his base.
01:00:19.000Along with saying that, well, only Israel would have an interest in Iran not having nukes or not being a global power.
01:00:31.000And it prevents us from having the legitimate conversation as to what kind of military intervention, if any, is appropriate.
01:00:38.000But we shouldn't have this conversation based on lies and stupid memes that your grandma forwarded because she watched Tucker's newest episode and likes that he has spank.
01:01:10.000By the way, really quickly, so as we were talking about this, the rapid response account that we had a problem with for clipping the worst context portion of that speech actually put out another post with the actual best portion of it.
01:01:22.000We don't have to play the clip, but basically in the text, they say, you know, basically, did you go, they asked the question, did you go for Israel and say Marco Rubio saying no, no, and then the rest of the answer.
01:01:30.000And it's like, that's the first thing you put out.
01:01:47.000And by the way, all nations do it, just to be clear.
01:01:50.000You don't think that two mommies and transitioning and sex change surgery in the United States military, you don't think that was propaganda from the Biden administration?
01:01:58.000And you don't think it's propaganda to varying degrees when this administration re-titles it the Department of War and says we are going to be the strongest, fittest military?
01:02:54.000You can't believe that we might not need your permission considering you haven't paid your contractually obligated bill for decades.
01:03:00.000It's such a moral wrong for us to deal with the regime in Iran that you are going to prevent us from using bases that, by the way, have also helped maintain the existence of your indefensible country.
01:03:14.000A country that did not help at all in a bunch of different conflicts last century.
01:03:32.000But my primary concern is with a lot of propaganda coming from Iran right now.
01:03:36.000And the reason why that's a primary concern is because I see people who claim to be America first parroting propaganda from Iran with no semblance of fact-checking or due diligence.
01:04:43.000And there's misinformation out there, so it's hard to know what's true.
01:04:46.000My issue is with people who should know better, who know that it's hard to know what's true and simply want to be first or want to score pot shots against consistently the United States.
01:04:59.000United States and Israel hit a school and they killed a bunch of kids, bunch of innocent children, the United States.
01:05:05.000Clearly, without the whole picture, without all the information, this was immediately parodied by Gavin Newsom and Jeffrey Sachs and the like.
01:05:12.000We have to reconcile why our bombs were used or Israeli bombs were used to kill children, young girls at a school, and what the imminent threat was.
01:05:46.000I will tell you, I can't fact check it because at this point in time, it's still unclear as to whether the United States did that.
01:05:54.000My issue is with people immediately assuming that the United States did that and implying that there was some nefarious motive, immediately and consistently painting the United States as the bad guys who target innocent children.
01:06:20.000The United States military killing children were the same people who were offended at the idea that the Israeli military go to lengths to protect civilians.
01:06:48.000And you said right in the middle of your elaborate defense of the IDF's killing of civilians, including children, you said they do a better job than the United States does.
01:07:15.000I did not take a dig at the U.S. What I'm saying is.
01:07:18.000You said the IDF is more humane than the U.S.
01:07:20.000And by the way, I probably agree with Tucker Carlson on more things in that interview than Governor Mike Huckabee, to be clear.
01:07:28.000But if you're going to be offended at that and say, I can't believe that you would imply the United States isn't as humane as Israel, do you have the same level of offense for people who immediately go, United States baby killers?
01:07:42.000Because you know who doesn't think that we're baby killers?
01:07:45.000The Iranian people all across the globe.
01:07:53.000But what I am saying is the Iranian people probably would have the strongest motivation to say, hey, the United States, you're the bad guys.
01:08:04.000Instead, they're dancing in the streets.
01:08:06.000So I ask you, why are commentators and influencers who accuse anyone of disagreeing with them, the people who call for the impeachment of Donald Trump, the people who say stay home during the midterms, why are they always immediately saying United States military are baby killers and they're doing it on purpose?
01:08:20.000So I can't tell you if we did do this.
01:08:22.000I would be willing to bet if it did happen that it obviously wasn't targeted.
01:08:26.000And I would direct you to, again, what was a fantastic press conference from Barco Rubio.
01:08:31.000This is how one should approach the fog of war.
01:09:31.000Well, it'd be very tragic, but I can't speak to the details behind it because I just don't have it.
01:09:36.000I think that's a good way to handle it.
01:09:38.000By the way, I could present to you the other, which would also be propaganda because some people are parroting this and they haven't done their due diligence either.
01:09:45.000There was an unverified telegram stating that Iran knew they struck their own school by accident and used it or on purpose, used it for propaganda.
01:10:05.000The same people who immediately jump and accuse this administration and accuse American troops of being baby killers are the same people who blamed, for example, the IDF for that Al-Ali hospital.
01:10:26.000If there is collateral damage, and there always will be in war, on the opposing side of the United States, with incomplete information as an America first person, I tend to believe that the United States is more likely to be the good guys than Iran.
01:12:14.000This comes to us, by the way, from CENTCOM.
01:12:16.000The Lincoln continues to launch aircraft in support of CENTCOM's relentless campaign to defend the American people by eliminating threats from the Iranian regime.
01:12:22.000it wasn't true the issue is that was parroted by now why would people the same people who jump to accuse the united states military of being baby killers and donald trump of betraying their base Same people, by the way, saying that this is an illegal war, also be really, really quick to jump the gun and say, look, the Lincoln was hit.