Louder with Crowder - EXCLUSIVE! Texas AG interview discussing SCOTUS SUIT! | Good Morning #MugClub

00:00:00.000 🎵 Music 🎵 1 in 40.

00:00:27.000 That's roughly the Trump legal team's record in court, getting smacked down by judge after judge, in state after state, because they've pushed ludicrous accusations without actual evidence.

00:00:37.000 Your president's legal team has not been able to produce any evidence of systemic fraud.

00:00:42.000 The president, without any evidence, tries to peddle his own alternative.

00:00:45.000 I want to be very, very clear.

00:00:47.000 There's absolutely no evidence, at least none we've seen, of any widespread voter fraud that the president and his team are alleging.

00:00:57.000 No credible examples.

00:00:59.000 No credible instances.

00:01:01.000 And now, Trump campaign officials, without any evidence to back up their claims, say the new law is ripe for voter fraud.

00:01:08.000 And they're suing Nevada now for expanding this mail-in voting in the middle of a public health crisis.

00:01:13.000 In Nevada, the Trump campaign claims, without any evidence, That thousands of people improperly cast their mail-in ballots.

00:01:23.000 And that's the actual registered address?

00:01:25.000 Yeah, we have hundreds.

00:01:27.000 They voted from that?

00:01:28.000 Yeah.

00:01:32.000 Wow.

00:01:37.000 This is definitely gonna take a while.

00:01:39.000 I'm not gonna lie, I'm not gonna lie.

00:01:41.000 I'm not gonna lie.

00:01:44.000 Subject for today! 0.98

00:01:48.000 Andy, the landlord, he's a nasty one.

00:01:52.000 Andy, the landlord, Andy, they've got one for today.

00:01:56.000 Mmm.

00:02:01.000 Mmm.

00:02:02.000 Delicious sip.

00:02:04.000 Steady.

00:02:05.000 My half-Asian lawyer Bill Richman is here with me, by the way.

00:02:07.000 People thought you disappeared, but it's because we can't talk about it.

00:02:11.000 Working.

00:02:11.000 We're working.

00:02:12.000 Working, and he makes his fingers like this, which means you know he's serious.

00:02:16.000 And they're stubby.

00:02:17.000 Half-stubby.

00:02:18.000 Porter Black Garrett is here.

00:02:19.000 Good morning.

00:02:20.000 I'm excited.

00:02:20.000 Sorry for the lack of acceptance.

00:02:21.000 Gerald A. is here.

00:02:22.000 We have a lot to get to, some updates on Swalwell, I was sad that you weren't here yesterday.

00:02:28.000 And by the way, everyone watching, the best thing you can do for this right now, just hit like while we're live, and if you're watching the Archive, just comment.

00:02:34.000 Comment on the video, that helps us cut through the YouTube algorithms.

00:02:37.000 I don't know if this will still be up, because it could be considered against YouTube's guidelines that we wanted to have someone authoritative.

00:02:45.000 I know it's not AP, but we actually have here with us for an exclusive, the Attorney General of Texas, Mr. Ken Paxton.

00:02:55.000 How are you, sir?

00:02:56.000 Thank you for being here.

00:02:57.000 Hey, I'm doing great.

00:02:58.000 It's been kind of a slow morning for me, but pretty good.

00:03:01.000 Yeah, you're moseying.

00:03:02.000 You're doing it at a Texas pace.

00:03:03.000 By the way, do you prefer Attorney, Mr. Paxton, Attorney, or just General?

00:03:11.000 Just call me Ken.

00:03:12.000 Well, come on now.

00:03:13.000 I appreciate it.

00:03:14.000 You know, it sounds weird.

00:03:16.000 The title is General Paxton.

00:03:19.000 That's what the title is.

00:03:21.000 The title is General Paxton.

00:03:22.000 Now, to be clear, because a lot of people will say, oh, hold on a second, we need authoritative sources.

00:03:26.000 You're a real Attorney General, right?

00:03:28.000 Not a patsy for the higher-ups.

00:03:31.000 That's true.

00:03:31.000 I'm a realtor.

00:03:32.000 I don't like the people in Texas.

00:03:34.000 Okay, good.

00:03:34.000 I want to make sure.

00:03:35.000 So you too, please don't remove him yet.

00:03:38.000 Really quickly, because I know you're busy, you're about to walk over to the Oval Office right after this spot, and I appreciate you making the time.

00:03:45.000 Treat me like many people in our audience, because I'm sure you know this has gotten convoluted with different suits.

00:03:51.000 Some are brought by the Trump team, some are brought by other Lawyers and some have been brought now, in this case, by an AG like yourself.

00:03:58.000 What is the suit from Texas?

00:04:00.000 Who are you guys suing?

00:04:02.000 And just in a summary, what is the basis of the suit?

00:04:06.000 Okay, the first thing I have to say is my daughter is having a baby today and my son-in-law said, I love this guy, can you get me one of those mugs autographed by him?

00:04:15.000 And I said, I'll do my best.

00:04:16.000 Well, I tell you what, I can't because we're rough on budget and I don't know him.

00:04:24.000 Okay, well, listen, I can't.

00:04:26.000 Love's a strong word.

00:04:28.000 Not only will I get him a mug, I'll get him a whole gift package.

00:04:31.000 We have some new hoodies, and I really appreciate that.

00:04:33.000 And we'll talk after you deal with some more important pressing matters.

00:04:37.000 But recap for people who don't know.

00:04:41.000 This suit that you have brought against the state of Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.

00:04:48.000 Tell them what it is, what the basis is.

00:04:49.000 So we simply are saying That these states ignored the Constitution, they ignored their own state laws, and throughout these states local elected officials and judges changed the law and made their elections not follow state law, which

00:05:08.000 Under the Constitution, they're not supposed to do.

00:05:10.000 Those elections are governed by state law, by state legislators, and when they start mucking around with state law, individual counties having different election laws than other counties, It creates credibility problems, and it's unconstitutional, and it affects my voters because we did it the right way.

00:05:29.000 We fought off all these lawsuits.

00:05:31.000 We followed state law.

00:05:32.000 And our elections are credible, and theirs are not.

00:05:35.000 And that disenfranchises my voters, and the voters of the rest of the country.

00:05:39.000 Absolutely.

00:05:40.000 And not only that, but Texas was one of the states that rejected using Dominion software, correct?

00:05:46.000 We've rejected it three times, and we've also had 12 lawsuits in federal court, state court, all over the state of Texas, 5th Circuit, Texas Supreme Court, challenging our laws on mail-in ballots, challenging our laws on signature verification.

00:06:01.000 We were successful in every single one of them, 12 lawsuits, and had we not, we would have been in the same situation as Georgia, and Michigan, and Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

00:06:10.000 You rejected it three times.

00:06:11.000 So like a voter fraud rejection hat trick, which by the way, I apologize, my half-Asian lawyer is here, he's breathing like a bulldog. 0.99

00:06:17.000 Let's turn down his microphone.

00:06:18.000 He's so interested, he's going...

00:06:24.000 Now, I want to go back to the constitutionality here in a second.

00:06:27.000 But before that, you know, there's there been a lot of rumors circulating and unfortunately some disinformation has taken place on the right as well as the left.

00:06:34.000 Now, 17 states have joined in as friends of the court, right?

00:06:38.000 Amici is the term.

00:06:40.000 But that doesn't mean that they've officially signed on.

00:06:42.000 And you said that this morning you can announce right here, right now, which states thus far have officially signed on to this suit with you in Texas.

00:06:52.000 So we have Actually no, 18 states.

00:06:54.000 Arizona is now part of that amicus process.

00:06:59.000 The other states that we are talking to about intervening have not actually filed, so I cannot say who they are, but there are several states that are likely to intervene in our case sometime today.

00:07:09.000 Sometime today.

00:07:10.000 Okay, you can't give us a hint?

00:07:11.000 Like, I don't know, they might have something to do with eyes that are bucked.

00:07:17.000 Well, because you never know what's going to happen until they file.

00:07:20.000 So until they file, they're not in.

00:07:22.000 So I know the president tried to intervene, so it's a big deal.

00:07:25.000 I mean, this is a big case.

00:07:26.000 Right.

00:07:27.000 And I had heard, listen, not from you, I want to be clear about that, but from some inside sources, they expect a minimum of four and a possibility of ten.

00:07:35.000 Does that sound about right?

00:07:37.000 Yeah, that sounds about right.

00:07:39.000 And like I said, it could happen or not happen.

00:07:42.000 I'm not in control of other states' decisions about whether to intervene.

00:07:45.000 I am only in control of what Texas did.

00:07:47.000 We obviously filed a lawsuit.

00:07:49.000 Right.

00:07:50.000 But these 17 other states, or 18, sorry, that have joined in, so what does that mean for people who don't understand?

00:07:56.000 Because some people think that means that they've officially joined in on the suit.

00:07:59.000 And Donald Trump has, by the way, the president, he's talked about intervening.

00:08:03.000 But what does it mean when they're just friends of the court?

00:08:05.000 We're talking about that amicus.

00:08:07.000 So intervening, you're actually a party.

00:08:09.000 You're standing alongside of us saying, hey, this was a wrong done to our citizens in our state.

00:08:13.000 And amicus is a friend of the court brief providing guidance to the court on issues that those states think will be relevant to the court.

00:08:23.000 And my understanding is that amicus will be favorable to us, obviously, but it's not like intervening.

00:08:29.000 Intervening is like, I'm part of this fight, I'm getting in, totally getting in, Very helpful.

00:08:36.000 We do a lot of amicus briefs ourselves, because sometimes we can't intervene, or it's not strategic to intervene.

00:08:43.000 It's not quite the same, but it's certainly useful.

00:08:46.000 Well, yeah, and I understand, but how could it not be strategic for them to intervene?

00:08:49.000 I guess, what should be the tipping point for someone who's saying, well, I support it, I'm a friend of the court, versus, you know, really having skin in the game?

00:08:56.000 Because a lot of Americans out there feel like, you know, they've been gaslit, they're taking crazy pills.

00:09:00.000 You, obviously, have the brass pair to step up.

00:09:03.000 Americans want to see other states officially, you know, sign on that dotted line, hey, we hear ya.

00:09:08.000 No, I'm with you.

00:09:09.000 I'd love to have them.

00:09:09.000 I'd take all 18 states intervening if they wanted to go with us.

00:09:13.000 We want them in.

00:09:14.000 We'll take them.

00:09:15.000 We're encouraging them to join us.

00:09:17.000 And to stand on the front lines with us and when we're in front of the U.S.

00:09:21.000 Supreme Court, be there, be there present, be a party and be part of the fight.

00:09:27.000 Right.

00:09:27.000 And we'll know by the end of the day, that's probably a big part of your conversation, who is joining in officially.

00:09:32.000 I wish you could tell me at least even like one or two, you know, I mean, please, can you also just, you know, have some kind of complaint?

00:09:39.000 Can you put it in there?

00:09:40.000 I know like with a bill and an earmark, something with John Kasich, just say like, and by the way, he pisses the rest of the country off.

00:09:45.000 Can there be a legal filing?

00:09:49.000 I don't know if he's going to be a part of this one.

00:09:52.000 Maybe tomorrow.

00:09:53.000 Maybe we'll follow that one tomorrow.

00:09:55.000 Well, just double dog dare him to lick a pole in the middle of December and that would be 0.93

00:09:59.000 good enough for me.

00:10:01.000 Let me ask you, recently filed brief, you called, or sorry, called this lawsuit a mockery

00:10:07.000 of federalism and separation of powers, right?

00:10:09.000 This is the arguments that they're using.

00:10:12.000 And they've suggested that it's not under the Supreme Court's constitutional purview

00:10:17.000 to serve as a trial court for the presidential election dispute.

00:10:20.000 So seeing what we've seen before, where a lot of these suits have just been tossed,

00:10:24.000 Right?

00:10:25.000 And that's been parroted by the media where they say, oh, 40 of Donald Trump suits have been tossed.

00:10:29.000 We know those aren't necessarily Donald Trump suits.

00:10:30.000 These are suits brought on by many different people.

00:10:33.000 Why do you think this, or why is this suit, why should Americans understand that this is different?

00:10:38.000 That as Donald Trump has said, the president, this is the big one.

00:10:42.000 So this is different because it's being brought by state.

00:10:45.000 So we have no other recourse other than to go to the U.S.

00:10:48.000 Supreme Court.

00:10:48.000 All these other cases, at least, whether they were tossed or not, At least you can say they had a chance to be heard somewhere.

00:10:55.000 We have nowhere else to go.

00:10:57.000 I feel like we've had a harm to my citizens, that their vote, they've been disenfranchised by these other states in a federal national election.

00:11:05.000 And so if the court doesn't grant us the ability to make the argument, we have nowhere to go and we're just being told, not only you're being tossed, but you don't even get to make the argument.

00:11:17.000 You don't even get to be heard.

00:11:19.000 Right, and that's the difference because, you know, I was watching CNN, SCOTUS was trending, you know, on social media, and I thought, oh, this must be because of General Paxton's suit, and instead it was about the Supreme Court, you know, kicking it back down to the lower Pennsylvania court, that other case that happened on the same day, and I think people don't understand that, listen, that's something that's happening within a state, it kind of came down to a deadline issue, but that's very different Uh, compared to a suit between states.

00:11:45.000 Necessarily, the Supreme Court has to intervene because you can't just say, well, let the state of, let the Supreme Court of Texas or Pennsylvania figure it out.

00:11:53.000 That's a, that's a very stark contrast that I think hasn't been really nailed into Americans' heads yet.

00:12:00.000 I don't think they fully grasp the consequences.

00:12:03.000 No, it's so important because I think there are some who think that the Supreme Court has to hear our case.

00:12:09.000 I mean, there are some on the court who I think believe that when the Constitution was written that states had nowhere to go because if they can't be heard, their only other opportunity was to go fight each other, right?

00:12:21.000 Right.

00:12:21.000 That's why they have to have a place.

00:12:23.000 If you don't want a war or some other type of action, you have to have a place to go redress your harm.

00:12:29.000 So there are some on the court who believe that they are required to hear that.

00:12:33.000 Unfortunately, the majority opinion on this has been it's up to them.

00:12:36.000 They can decide for whatever reason, yes or no.

00:12:40.000 They don't have to even have a reason.

00:12:41.000 They can just say no.

00:12:42.000 And unfortunately, that is the current, I think, majority opinion.

00:12:46.000 I'm just hoping in this case they'll see it as important enough to hear it.

00:12:52.000 I guess, you know, we've seen these voter rolls as it relates to these issues, you know, voter irregularities.

00:12:58.000 Sorry, on YouTube we can't say voter fraud, but irregularities.

00:13:02.000 People have brought forward videotape, hundreds of affidavits, and so many cases have just been tossed, right?

00:13:08.000 Tossed.

00:13:10.000 What does it take?

00:13:10.000 I mean, the evidence hasn't even been examined in some of these other cases.

00:13:14.000 How do you, I guess, how do you remain hopeful that at least what you're bringing forward and the evidence is seen?

00:13:20.000 Because we've seen judges say, don't want to see it.

00:13:23.000 So, you know, we referenced some of the evidence that we have, but our case is fundamentally not even built on that because I've watched what's happened.

00:13:30.000 And, you know, frankly, I'm disappointed that it hasn't gotten a more thorough review by our judiciary for whatever reason.

00:13:39.000 Our case doesn't rest on how valid the fraud is or not.

00:13:43.000 Not.

00:13:44.000 We are resting completely on the Constitution that we know for a fact that these legislatures We're not basing it on anything that we have to go prove as it relates to fraud.

00:13:52.000 and that there are equal protection issues about different voters being treated differently,

00:13:57.000 that there are ballot fraud issues that were not addressed, like no signature verification.

00:14:02.000 You've got drop boxes being dropped in Georgia that are just dropped off and people can throw

00:14:07.000 their ballots in there. I mean, those are in violation of state law. That's a fact.

00:14:11.000 Right.

00:14:12.000 So we're not basing it on anything that we have to go prove as it relates to fraud. We're basing

00:14:18.000 it on what we know happened as a fact, and we're asking the court to say, hey, look,

00:14:22.000 this is wrong.

00:14:24.000 It needs to be addressed.

00:14:25.000 And it negatively affects, you know, members of other states.

00:14:28.000 Listen, as someone who's sort of more of a libertarian conservative, right, we talk about federalism on this show, I understand states having the ability to govern themselves.

00:14:36.000 But this is a question that I have, and maybe you might be able to help clarify, because I could be wrong.

00:14:42.000 We do have a baseline minimum, you know, of laws, meaning, okay, you can't kill, you can't steal. We do have a baseline

00:14:48.000 minimum, for example, nationally what an adult is for enlistment. Now states can change

00:14:53.000 where you can drink, right? But why don't we have, it seems like we have a baseline nationally when

00:14:59.000 elections need to take place, right, election day, but how is it, how do we juxtapose

00:15:04.000 this with the Constitution where you have some states where you require a valid address and some

00:15:09.000 state laws don't? 0.87

00:15:11.000 It seems like there should be some kind of standardization just to set a baseline that we know legal American citizens are voting.

00:15:19.000 And am I off base there?

00:15:21.000 Well, and the way that it was set up was that the states could determine some of these rules as it related to their election.

00:15:28.000 So, for instance, I think Nevada legislature actually went back and changed their laws as it related because of COVID and made it very easy to vote by mail.

00:15:36.000 I mean, so we do have states where the legislature set it up, so it's It creates some of these issues that we're talking about.

00:15:45.000 And that may be a national debate that we need to be having at the federal level to say, hey, we need to fix this across the nation because we can't trust these elections.

00:15:55.000 If the legislature goes and changes these rules, it makes it really easy for people to Yeah.

00:16:01.000 Well, I appreciate it, and I know you're busy.

00:16:10.000 I have a couple more questions for you, real quick.

00:16:12.000 I will go to you, but one second.

00:16:14.000 And the reason I bring that up is because we are doing a show next Thursday, right, where we are going to be driving across Nevada in an RV.

00:16:20.000 So we have some brilliant researchers who work here and we have between 30 or 40 or 50 addresses.

00:16:25.000 We'll hit as many as we can live streaming uncut for four to six hours.

00:16:30.000 Addresses that we know don't exist or are invalid addresses.

00:16:33.000 Empty lots.

00:16:34.000 We will show people because they hear the numbers and they go, okay, a few thousand here.

00:16:38.000 But a lot of people don't believe it.

00:16:39.000 The reason we had to do it in Nevada is because in Michigan, it's okay for someone to register at an empty lot.

00:16:45.000 And that really struck us as odd.

00:16:48.000 And it was something that actually narrowed down the states where we had to say, actually, it's not lawful for you to vote from a place that doesn't exist.

00:16:54.000 But in some states it is.

00:16:55.000 My half-Asian lawyer here, Bill Richman, did have a question for you.

00:16:59.000 He's far smarter than I am, and I appreciate your time.

00:17:01.000 Go ahead, Mr. Kraken.

00:17:05.000 General Paxton, one of the interesting things I thought stood out from the filing you made with the Supreme Court was the phrase, an unconstitutional relaxation of ballot integrity protections.

00:17:16.000 And to me, that said it all, right?

00:17:17.000 It's saying there are laws in place, there are rules in place, and the states are not following them.

00:17:22.000 We all agree about what they did, now it's just a matter of determining was it constitutional or unconstitutional.

00:17:27.000 For our audience members across the country and in these states that are only amici or haven't even jumped in to file an amicus brief on this particular issue, why should they be interested in making sure that their voice is heard and that their attorney generals are actually joining in to combat the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot integrity protections?

00:17:49.000 That's a great question.

00:17:51.000 It was a little bit of a boring one, I'll be honest, but a little wonkish, but go ahead!

00:17:56.000 It was a little long.

00:17:58.000 I'll say a little long.

00:17:59.000 What was the question again?

00:18:02.000 Are you sure about those five minutes?

00:18:04.000 Alright, here we go.

00:18:05.000 Why should citizens want their AGs to join the fight?

00:18:09.000 Because I think that they are being disenfranchised.

00:18:13.000 If your state followed state law and produced election results that were based on state law as required by the U.S.

00:18:21.000 Constitution, and other states said, we're not going to follow those constitutional requirements, We're not going to follow our state law and as a result we don't really know, we can't verify whether any of these 2.5 million ballots, mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania are real.

00:18:37.000 Well, that's a problem for my state because my state is following the law and now we've got all these states we don't know what the real result is and it affects the outcome of the election.

00:18:49.000 And that affects my state.

00:18:50.000 Yeah.

00:18:51.000 It affects a federal election.

00:18:52.000 You know, if state's changing laws, it ultimately affects a federal election.

00:18:56.000 Three quick questions for you before you go, and I know you're busy, and tell the president I say hi, though I don't think he'll care.

00:19:02.000 If at 3 o'clock... He might.

00:19:04.000 Somebody will.

00:19:05.000 He might.

00:19:05.000 He might be like, that guy, he wears pajamas!

00:19:08.000 No!

00:19:10.000 At 3 p.m., right, and we'll know today, people watching, the states that officially join in, but let's say the Supreme Court declines to hear your case, what are your next steps?

00:19:20.000 You know, we have nowhere to go.

00:19:21.000 I mean, that's our only place to file our case.

00:19:25.000 We don't have another filing place.

00:19:27.000 We can't go to district court.

00:19:28.000 That's why I am saying this really matters for the Supreme Court to give us a chance to at least present our side.

00:19:35.000 Right.

00:19:35.000 That's all we're asking.

00:19:36.000 And another question, is there anything that the American people, you know, we have hundreds of thousands of people watching right now, right now, this second, there'll be millions of people, is there anything they can do to help?

00:19:45.000 Yes, I think encourage your Attorney General to intervene.

00:19:48.000 I mean, or participate in this process.

00:19:51.000 It's our last chance, and it may be our last chance forever because if this gets set this way...

00:19:58.000 I mean, we may never have elections again that we can count on.

00:20:01.000 This is setting the future of our country and how elections are going to be done.

00:20:06.000 Right.

00:20:07.000 Here's my final question, and I don't mean for it to be a hardball question, but I will say this.

00:20:11.000 The sort of feeling from a lot of Americans with, you know, Donald Trump in office and Republicans in control of a lot of areas of government.

00:20:19.000 Not a lot has been done.

00:20:20.000 You know, I go, for example, it required liberals in New York to file suit on the grounds of, you know, 230 or monopolies with big tech.

00:20:30.000 When do you think all Republicans are going to, or can we hope for other Republicans to grow a backbone like you seem to be, General Paxton?

00:20:38.000 I'm just going to tell you, we're really disappointed.

00:20:40.000 I'm glad to see you doing this, but we're really disappointed with the people we've put in office.

00:20:44.000 Well, you know, I understand that.

00:20:46.000 I have my own disappointments.

00:20:47.000 By the way, on that Facebook complaint, we're on that complaint.

00:20:49.000 Yes.

00:20:50.000 And you will see more from us on different issues coming very soon.

00:20:55.000 So, no, I get it.

00:20:58.000 I find it shocking that, you know, there were so few people interested initially in being a part of this.

00:21:05.000 I'm grateful that, you know, this case has created enough interest that now we've got people focused on it.

00:21:13.000 I think there's good reason to have some disappointment in what Republicans have done, and I'm hopeful that this will galvanize us to realize that we could lose our democracy in the way that the founder set it up, and that this really is like crunch time.

00:21:30.000 It's a threshold issue of survival of our democracy.

00:21:36.000 Yeah, I agree with you and there we hear it for American people to petition your AGs.

00:21:41.000 Tell them to grow a pair.

00:21:43.000 And please, let us know.

00:21:44.000 I know you're busy and you have to go.

00:21:45.000 We'll be looking for the official announcement here later today.

00:21:48.000 If there's anything we can do, don't hesitate to reach out.

00:21:51.000 And please, be safe today and give them hell, Mr. Paxton.

00:21:56.000 Hey, I appreciate you having me on, and your reputation precedes you from my own family members, so thanks for having me on.

00:22:05.000 Well, it sounds to me like you need better family members, but thank you, Mr. Paxton.

00:22:09.000 I appreciate it. 0.98

00:22:10.000 Give him hell. 0.99

00:22:11.000 That was lovely to have him on. 0.85

00:22:14.000 Yeah, I loved hearing that because he made that same point that we've been talking about.

00:22:19.000 You can't just break your own laws with elections and disenfranchise every other state.

00:22:22.000 You just can't do it.

00:22:23.000 So if the Supreme Court does not give him an opportunity like he said, I see very difficult times ahead trying to get somebody to listen to what you're saying if you're in a state that gets disenfranchised in the future.

00:22:33.000 And I had other things that I wanted to ask him about.

00:22:35.000 They've had 12 suits in Texas on election fraud that they've won.

00:22:39.000 Correct.

00:22:40.000 For people who understand this, these things happen within the states.

00:22:43.000 The consequences, if they had lost even one of those, could be monumental.

00:22:47.000 Right.

00:22:47.000 Every single one of those was an opportunity that would have been a monumental failure, but they didn't.

00:22:51.000 They pushed forward.

00:22:52.000 They did it the right way.

00:22:53.000 And really what they're saying is, and I would encourage people to read the actual complaint that was filed.

00:22:57.000 I would encourage you to bring the microphone a little bit closer.

00:22:59.000 No, I don't want to breathe in it.

00:23:01.000 Earlier you were wheezing into it like a pug.

00:23:03.000 I am a pug.

00:23:05.000 Okay.

00:23:06.000 But here's, breaking, Will's a pug!

00:23:06.000 Whoa!

00:23:09.000 AudioWay just really liked me now.

00:23:12.000 So here's the thing is when you actually read it like that phrase for example was just incredible where you know the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot integrity protections.

00:23:22.000 I feel like I'm in the locker room in high school. 0.99

00:23:27.000 Except it was a penis, unfortunately. 0.99

00:23:30.000 Every time I run into Gerald, this is what he tries to do to me. 0.98

00:23:34.000 So when you listen to that, go read that and compare that to some of the other lawsuits that were filed.

00:23:38.000 And the way that it says is, look at the facts.

00:23:41.000 We know how you were running it in these states.

00:23:43.000 We know how you were running it in the TCF Center in Detroit.

00:23:48.000 We know how you were running it in Georgia.

00:23:50.000 We know how you're running in Pennsylvania.

00:23:52.000 We're not saying you should have done something like you should have changed the laws.

00:23:55.000 We're saying you didn't follow your own laws.

00:23:58.000 And that calls into question.

00:23:59.000 So now that that last question I was asking about why should other people care, it's because if these states are allowed to do whatever they want with regards to ballot integrity protections, Yeah.

00:24:11.000 That means your vote is reduced in statute.

00:24:14.000 I tell you, though, we had gotten into the scoop that he was going to give us the actual states that are joined on.

00:24:19.000 So I'm sorry if I told you guys, because that's what we had.

00:24:23.000 But I guess, you know, legal issues.

00:24:24.000 But you'll probably know in the next couple of hours.

00:24:26.000 However, the number, it's a number that might surprise you.

00:24:30.000 I'm looking forward to that.

00:24:32.000 Listen, there's a little inside baseball and I can't tell you because I don't want to be subpoenaed on that.

00:24:36.000 Though, you know, on the big tech issue, God, I hope I never get dragged in.

00:24:41.000 It was a bigger number than we thought on the amici thing.

00:24:43.000 18 rather than 17.

00:24:46.000 Yeah, that's surprising, and if just a few of them actually sack up to actually have some skin in the game, that could be a big deal.

00:24:54.000 Did I make his audio better for you, or did I make it worse?

00:24:57.000 So good.

00:24:58.000 By the way, hit the notification bell if you are subscribed, because subscriptions don't mean a whole lot.

00:25:02.000 And let me know, by the way, comment if you got a notification yesterday, because a lot of people didn't get a notification or only got it after the stream had been off air for an hour.

00:25:12.000 That's another example of YouTube screwery, which we will get into in a little bit.

00:25:18.000 We have a bunch of news to get to.

00:25:19.000 Also, there are hearings right now going on in Georgia, which we'll be covering in a little bit.

00:25:24.000 But first, we talked about Eric Swalwell yesterday.

00:25:26.000 We did.

00:25:27.000 You know this, right?

00:25:27.000 You weren't here with us.

00:25:28.000 No, no, no.

00:25:28.000 Banging fang fang.

00:25:30.000 You know your people were involved.

00:25:31.000 Fang fang. 1.00

00:25:32.000 Fang fang. 1.00

00:25:33.000 Is that how it's pronounced?

00:25:33.000 Fang fang.

00:25:34.000 I love you, my fang fang. 0.68

00:25:36.000 You don't know Wang Wang, the spy?

00:25:37.000 No.

00:25:38.000 Is he Indonesian?

00:25:39.000 We can bring that up.

00:25:41.000 Eric Swalwell, we covered this yesterday, and we so boldly assumed that he did it.

00:25:50.000 And he just released a statement, I think we have a clip now, in response to it.

00:25:53.000 At first, what he said, and what he should have continued saying, was nothing.

00:25:59.000 There's some wisdom there.

00:26:00.000 Instead, he responded, see if you hear, uh, not guilty in there.

00:26:05.000 This is Swalwell's response.

00:26:07.000 But the wrongdoing here, Jim, is that at the same time this story was being leaked out, is the time that I was working on impeachment on the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees.

00:26:17.000 And if this is a country where people who criticize the president are going to have law enforcement information weaponized against them, that's not a country that any of us want to live in.

00:26:26.000 And I hope it is investigated as to Who leaked this information?

00:26:32.000 If I'm if I'm if I'm if I'm for sure I just go what'd you do you mean the FBI sex tape?

00:26:39.000 And I understand by the way using arms of the government like the FBI or the CIA

00:26:46.000 Uh, or the internal revenue service to target political opponents. I understand that's a problem

00:26:51.000 Obviously, I would agree with you on that but more pressing did you bang an an asian spy on tape?

00:26:57.000 Right and by the way, the surest way to derail impeachment was to go after swalwell like 1.00

00:27:02.000 He wasn't in charge of it, he was working with other people at work!

00:27:06.000 At that point, just lie.

00:27:08.000 Clearly the Chinese spy has no problem lying and leaping their way to the top of Swalwell, but once the story is released, just say it was Obama at that point. 0.79

00:27:19.000 If you don't have a problem lying...

00:27:22.000 Are you saying he should have said he was sleeping with Obama?

00:27:26.000 No, the Chinese spy.

00:27:29.000 Once the Chinese spy probably didn't really know, you know, cultural differences and then came back and was like, you know, like a dog bringing in a dead bird and they brought you a gift. 0.59

00:27:37.000 You're like, I don't want that.

00:27:37.000 Like, hey, hey.

00:27:38.000 And they're like, oh, it's Swalwell. 1.00

00:27:40.000 Son of a bitch. 1.00

00:27:41.000 You're fired. 1.00

00:27:43.000 Really, it was like sleeping your way to mediocrity, not the top, right?

00:27:46.000 She really aimed wrong.

00:27:47.000 She was like the C-team, and they were like, yeah, yeah, yeah, just see if you can find just some random guy.

00:27:51.000 It was training, basically.

00:27:52.000 It was Swalwell being like, I'm really important.

00:27:55.000 I'm really, really... Oh, Swalwell!

00:27:58.000 Oh, please tell me you double bag it!

00:28:04.000 Also, this is something interesting.

00:28:05.000 I think Andrew Klavan has talked about this.

00:28:07.000 If there's a scandal with a Republican or a Conservative, it's about that scandal.

00:28:11.000 And if it's a scandal with a Liberal, like Swalwell, it's how did they get the information.

00:28:16.000 Same thing happened, by the way, with that man, Andrew Breitbart, with Anthony Weiner, where he had pictures of his giant, throbbing erection from the Space Odyssey angle.

00:28:28.000 And they just claimed that nothing was going on.

00:28:30.000 And then they said, well, how did Andrew Breitbart procure this?

00:28:32.000 And that was Andrew Breitbart's story.

00:28:33.000 He was saying, well, that's my question, is who else has these pictures and what kind of leverage do they have on our officials?

00:28:38.000 Just prosciutto.

00:28:39.000 Jim Prosciutto at CNN. 0.99

00:28:40.000 Just, did you have sex with the Asian spy? 0.99

00:28:43.000 And was she worth it? 1.00

00:28:45.000 That's the question.

00:28:47.000 I'm sorry, was that a yes you slept with a spy or a no she walked out when you dropped your paper? 0.98

00:28:52.000 Can you imagine if there were, I don't know, let's say actual videographic evidence of Donald Trump watching Russian prostitutes peeing on furniture? 0.98

00:29:01.000 That would be the story for the entire day. 0.94

00:29:04.000 I've been watching seen in a 24-hour cycle.

00:29:06.000 They barely touch it.

00:29:08.000 And then they ask him that and they go, well, what happened?

00:29:10.000 I can't believe that this information was leaked.

00:29:12.000 Good enough for me.

00:29:12.000 Back to you, papi.

00:29:13.000 Well, we don't have to imagine, Stephen.

00:29:15.000 His taxes were leaked illegally and then covered in contravention to all of the YouTube, Facebook, Twitter's policies on hacked information being leaked.

00:29:24.000 And it was put out there.

00:29:25.000 Nobody asked how they got it.

00:29:26.000 Which was Swalwell?

00:29:26.000 No, no, no.

00:29:27.000 Trump.

00:29:27.000 We don't have to imagine if something could happen like that for Trump.

00:29:30.000 We have a specific case.

00:29:31.000 Oh, speaking of which, we have more info on Hunter Biden.

00:29:33.000 Turns out, now that the break is certified, he is under investigation.

00:29:39.000 It's a tax issue.

00:29:40.000 That's what people say.

00:29:40.000 It's a tax issue.

00:29:41.000 A tax issue in relation to China.

00:29:43.000 Going down with China. 0.97

00:29:45.000 Corruption with China. 1.00

00:29:47.000 Sorry, half-Asian. 1.00

00:29:51.000 A lot of the Chinese stories today.

00:29:53.000 Look, look, look.

00:29:53.000 I'm just going to say that the Chinese version of the KGB slash CIA is right now killing people's families for having been caught.

00:30:01.000 I mean, the person who slept with Swalwell, her whole line is going to be wiped out for having gone over someone so low.

00:30:07.000 They're very ruthless.

00:30:09.000 What can I say?

00:30:10.000 You think she'll be punished for not being someone higher up?

00:30:13.000 Yeah, they're going to make her go back and do it again with Swalwell. 1.00

00:30:16.000 No, no.

00:30:17.000 Go until he's important.

00:30:18.000 Go until he's important.

00:30:20.000 That's what he said to her.

00:30:21.000 That's what he screams.

00:30:22.000 I'M IMPORTANT!

00:30:25.000 He did that in the interview with Prosciutto and Cheese.

00:30:32.000 They let her live for better than this.

00:30:33.000 Come on! 0.61

00:30:34.000 As a baby, come on.

00:30:36.000 Hey, by the way, we don't know how long we'll be on here, so we are on Parler.

00:30:40.000 Facebook things are changing a little bit, and we'll be taking some live chat as we cover these hearings in a little bit on Georgia for Mug Club only.

00:30:48.000 Lightoffcutter.com slash Mug Club.

00:30:50.000 That's what allows us to do this, and that's what allows us to do the live stream next week.

00:30:54.000 Still, you know, 10 a.m.

00:30:56.000 Eastern from Nevada.

00:30:57.000 We will be driving around.

00:30:59.000 We're creating the maps.

00:31:01.000 If I could go to hundreds or thousands of addresses, I would.

00:31:04.000 I think we'll probably be able to hit somewhere between 20 and 40.

00:31:07.000 It'll be between 3 and 6 hours of streaming, and you can see that these addresses don't exist.

00:31:13.000 Nothing to see there!

00:31:15.000 I double-dog dare you to ban this, YouTube!

00:31:18.000 Oh, another story before we move on, because we have a lot to talk about with YouTube.

00:31:21.000 Thank you so much.

00:31:22.000 I'm glad my half-Asian Kraken's here. 0.99

00:31:26.000 You guys probably know that Michigan Representative RuPaul Cynthia Johnson threatened to trump supporters on Facebook since she's actually been removed from her post. 0.64

00:31:37.000 So many of you have seen this probably, but I watched it and I was appalled.

00:31:43.000 And sometimes what happens with the show is I'll watch something, I'll see it breaking, I'm appalled, and then by the time I have to cover it on the show, I've seen it two, three times, and some of that fire is gone.

00:31:53.000 So, um, actually this is what we will introduce as a new segment.

00:31:57.000 So, you know exactly how he's feeling at that moment in time.

00:31:59.000 So, you know, that I'm in this fight with you where we will watch this tape, uh, and

00:32:03.000 uh, I will get into the zone in what we call reacting.

00:32:07.000 Okay.

00:32:16.000 Uh, so let me get in the headspace of when I saw this yesterday.

00:32:19.000 Maybe it was the day before.

00:32:20.000 So you can know exactly how I was feeling at that point in time.

00:32:25.000 Let's go to Michigan Democrat State Representative Cynthia RuPaul Johnson. 1.00

00:32:31.000 So this is just a warning to you Trumpers.

00:32:36.000 Be careful.

00:32:38.000 Walk lightly.

00:32:41.000 We ain't playing with you.

00:32:44.000 Enough of the shenanigans.

00:32:48.000 Enough is enough.

00:32:51.000 And for those of you who are soldiers, you know how to do it.

00:32:59.000 Do it right.

00:33:00.000 Be in order.

00:33:03.000 Make them pay.

00:33:05.000 I love y'all.

00:33:07.000 Bye-bye.

00:33:08.000 It's like you were there.

00:33:20.000 Yeah, yeah.

00:33:21.000 Wow.

00:33:22.000 That was riveting.

00:33:23.000 You're amazing.

00:33:24.000 Did you have to go under your past to use something?

00:33:27.000 I read a book from Daniel Day-Lewis.

00:33:30.000 But then I just kept running around the house going, GIVE ME MY NAME!

00:33:33.000 I've abandoned my boy.

00:33:39.000 Going through the fridge looking for a milkshake.

00:33:41.000 If I drink your milkshake, I drink it up!

00:33:45.000 What is this film?

00:33:47.000 It's Oscar bait!

00:33:50.000 That's when Joe Louis goes and hides behind the couch.

00:33:54.000 He's like, not the milkshake!

00:33:57.000 I don't want him to take my milkshake.

00:34:00.000 Alright, so we just went through that.

00:34:02.000 My question to you, by the way, as we go into YouTube, again, just comment below.

00:34:05.000 This is the best thing you can do to help these get through the YouTube algorithm.

00:34:09.000 Have you seen, can you remember any example, while we're talking about YouTube and their interference now in not only pre-election but post-election news coverage, can you think of anything comparable happening with someone from the left?

00:34:23.000 And I don't mean a leftist channel being taken down for a copyright strike. 0.93

00:34:27.000 I mean actually removing fake news from the left, for example, like Russia or peeing Russian prostitutes. 0.85

00:34:33.000 Tell me if anything comes to mind. 0.94

00:34:35.000 I remember a really good one.

00:34:37.000 It was back in the beginning of COVID when all these sites were like, don't wear masks.

00:34:41.000 Terrible.

00:34:42.000 And you remember YouTube came by and they just removed all of those Yeah.

00:34:46.000 Oh no, they didn't.

00:34:48.000 No, but we were fact-checked because we said, you know, wearing masks is good.

00:34:52.000 Yeah, yeah.

00:34:54.000 Commie.

00:34:54.000 Yeah, and YouTube said, see Fauci.

00:34:57.000 And he was like, don't wear masks.

00:34:58.000 And we were like, oh my gosh.

00:35:01.000 We can never put one over on Fauci.

00:35:03.000 It's tough to do that when someone has no accountability or track record of being right.

00:35:09.000 Um, just Google for people out there.

00:35:12.000 Fauci AIDS.

00:35:13.000 Just run a quick search.

00:35:14.000 Look in the history.

00:35:15.000 Fauci AIDS.

00:35:16.000 Yeah, okay.

00:35:17.000 I don't know if Google will tell them.

00:35:19.000 Yeah, I don't know if Google will tell them.

00:35:20.000 Just put safe search on.

00:35:24.000 So here's YouTube.

00:35:25.000 We'll recap what kind of happened yesterday.

00:35:26.000 I wanted to go through this with my half-faced lawyer, Bill Richman.

00:35:27.000 YouTube claimed about the election, you know, stories.

00:35:32.000 We will start removing any piece of content uploaded today or any time after that misleads people.

00:35:38.000 Can you bring this up there as an overlay?

00:35:39.000 That misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

00:35:48.000 In line with our approach towards historical U.S.

00:35:52.000 presidential elections.

00:35:55.000 I guess we don't have the policy up here.

00:35:56.000 You guys saw it yesterday.

00:35:58.000 Do we have it there?

00:36:00.000 Just know that I'm not lying.

00:36:01.000 Just go to Google or YouTube and type in policy.

00:36:05.000 Now if you're looking for it it's under the heading of spam and scams.

00:36:08.000 Yes, exactly.

00:36:09.000 Or by the way, just hit lottowithcrowder.com.

00:36:11.000 There's a link in the description below and we have all the links and the sources that we try to make available to you.

00:36:15.000 Spam and Scam sounds like a buddy cop movie.

00:36:18.000 It does.

00:36:18.000 Spam and Scam.

00:36:20.000 Could you clean up your room?

00:36:21.000 Oh, you're so uptight.

00:36:24.000 It's like fake ham and the other fake ham.

00:36:27.000 I mean, it is like a buddy cop animal movie, you know, where it's like a cat and a hedgehog or something.

00:36:34.000 But no, that's what it is. 0.95

00:36:35.000 It's like a buddy cop film with YouTube and Facebook, where all they do is beat down black guys mercilessly with no cause. 0.97

00:36:41.000 While they cackle on their billions of dollars.

00:36:44.000 So a quick, by the way, a quick YouTube search reveals, it shows us that this is not true, to be clear.

00:36:50.000 So I want to read this quote again, that they will remove any piece of content uploaded today or after that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors.

00:37:00.000 Change the outcome of the election.

00:37:01.000 Now, the key there is they say 2020 election.

00:37:03.000 Yeah.

00:37:03.000 Because why doesn't it apply to other elections?

00:37:05.000 In other words, the spirit of the law should be, okay, you want to remove fraudulent information.

00:37:11.000 Yeah.

00:37:12.000 Well, as of right now, I think we have a montage.

00:37:15.000 There are still many clips up claiming that the 2016 win of President Trump, your president, not president-elect because Jim Prosciutto says so, lost because of fraud in 2016.

00:37:27.000 Russia hacked the 2016 elections, and they're going to do it again.

00:37:32.000 It's not that the Russians will be back. 0.99

00:37:33.000 Still up!

00:37:34.000 They haven't left.

00:37:35.000 And they will only get better.

00:37:37.000 Their methods will only grow more sophisticated.

00:37:39.000 U.S.

00:37:40.000 officials say that they have no reason to believe the Russian cyber attacks will stop.

00:37:44.000 Elaine, the other problem is, it is likely that the Russian hacking units hit targets that have yet to show up on U.S.

00:37:51.000 investigators' radar.

00:37:52.000 If you can get a hashtag trending on Twitter, or chum the waters with fake news directed

00:37:58.000 to audiences primed to receive it, or drive journalists to dissect terabytes of email

00:38:03.000 for a scent of impropriety—all tactics used in Russian operations—then you've got

00:38:08.000 a shot at effectively camouflaging your operations in the mind of your target.

00:38:14.000 If this were Red Dawn, they'd be fighting against the Wolverine.

00:38:18.000 Get out of here, Swayze! 1.00

00:38:22.000 They themselves, in perpetuating this narrative, have been doing the bidding for, not really so much the Russians, but the Chinese.

00:38:29.000 Oh, absolutely.

00:38:29.000 That's also how Swalwell fell into the trap.

00:38:31.000 I appreciate the cooperativeness.

00:38:35.000 So that, by the way, so they can push this, which is verifiably false, there has been an investigation.

00:38:39.000 Unlike right now, where there have been suits filed and there hasn't been a full investigation.

00:38:44.000 The suits aren't even done.

00:38:46.000 The election, the disputes have not even been resolved.

00:38:49.000 That is resolved.

00:38:50.000 It did not happen.

00:38:51.000 Donald Trump basically, he was a victim of the greatest witch hunt of modern American history for a phone call.

00:38:58.000 You may not like it, but, and Bill Barr had to say it, and you know he probably really didn't want to.

00:39:04.000 Something else, while we're talking about this, sure they still have disinformation up there about the Russian hacking, but YouTube Well, they're saying right now they're going to get rid of anyone who even addresses widespread voter fraud.

00:39:17.000 They still have content up on their platform that is bordering on... Well, some of it, no, is outright illegal.

00:39:24.000 Here you go.

00:39:25.000 What you do is you light it and you keep the flame about an inch away.

00:39:29.000 Now, if you see what I'm doing, you slowly rotate it left and right.

00:39:34.000 And then you'll start to see a vapor start to come up and then you hit it.

00:39:38.000 Keep it lit and hit it and keep rotating it.

00:39:40.000 We got some hash.

00:39:43.000 We got some molly. 0.98

00:39:43.000 How to sell drugs. 0.98

00:39:45.000 We got some shrooms for 60.

00:39:46.000 What a title!

00:39:46.000 How do they ship it?

00:39:47.000 Is it private or are they shipping it to FedEx?

00:39:51.000 We use all three providers actually.

00:39:54.000 He went on Shark Tank.

00:39:55.000 Shipping it, driving it.

00:39:58.000 Whatever it takes to get it, here we go.

00:39:59.000 How to sell drugs on YouTube. 0.99

00:40:03.000 They're not stupid either. 0.99

00:40:04.000 They know what's going on. 0.98

00:40:05.000 Everybody's doing it right now.

00:40:06.000 So I'm going to try and order some drugs online.

00:40:08.000 And to do this, I'm going to set up my own Instagram account and Snapchat account.

00:40:15.000 Animal cruelty.

00:40:20.000 We'll try and keep this as short as possible.

00:40:24.000 That's the one that I guess YouTube might say is borderline content.

00:40:27.000 No, that's a copyright strike from Netflix on Cuties.

00:40:29.000 Yeah, it's a copyright on Cuties.

00:40:31.000 Let's turn it because you have little girls and thongs and apparently that's not a problem. 1.00

00:40:34.000 And we blurred it, so it wasn't blurred originally.

00:40:39.000 But we didn't blur the drug dealer guy.

00:40:41.000 Though we knew who it was when that same face and blur showed up on Shark Tank saying, I'm seeking $20 million for a 10% stake in my crack house.

00:40:55.000 What do you think?

00:40:56.000 Maybe not. 1.00

00:41:00.000 I know Lloyd Grineer might be right for this because you sell cheap shit on QVC. 0.99

00:41:06.000 She can't sell anything. 0.96

00:41:08.000 And by the way, YouTube is now, we're opening up the floor to Bill Richman and stuff, and everyone can let us know what's going on with the Georgia hearings.

00:41:13.000 YouTube's not only let these videos obviously flourish regarding the 2016 myth, but they also have allowed many videos that just claim Donald Trump is an illegitimate president, right?

00:41:21.000 You can still find these things right now available on YouTube.

00:41:26.000 And the funny thing is, too, there's fact checks About the election, they just redirect to a general government website that says, oh no, the election's been called, or any claims of voter fraud are in dispute.

00:41:39.000 That's all they do.

00:41:40.000 There's no link to ongoing lawsuits.

00:41:42.000 There's no link to evidence.

00:41:43.000 There's no link to voter rolls.

00:41:45.000 There's no link to the complaints to the file.

00:41:47.000 There's no link right now to the Supreme Court case.

00:41:50.000 You may not like it, but that is relevant, and these disputes are still ongoing.

00:41:56.000 Well, and I know that there's this fraud kind of thing that they put in there, but why did they use the word errors?

00:42:01.000 If you refer to election errors, like, the only way we're going to do that is if there was an error made.

00:42:06.000 Like, it's a binary thing.

00:42:07.000 They either did it right or they didn't do it right.

00:42:09.000 Why would you give that caveat?

00:42:11.000 And the other part of it is the phrase widespread, right?

00:42:13.000 Right.

00:42:14.000 No one's alleging that, you know, there was some, like, election... Hold on one second.

00:42:17.000 Giuliani is on.

00:42:18.000 He looks pretty good for a guy with a disease with a 99.97% survival rate.

00:42:24.000 Stands out in a way and will always stand out in posterity with regard to this election because you have the thing that's going to live after this election no matter what and that is the videotape that proves that anyone who says that fraud is been debunked or there is no fraud is just plain blind or lying.

00:42:49.000 You have live from Atlanta, you've got Voter fraud right in front of people's eyes.

00:42:57.000 It's tough to tell the difference between COVID Rudy and non-COVID Rudy.

00:43:01.000 Yeah, debilitating disease.

00:43:03.000 But that's just the way he is.

00:43:04.000 It seems like he's doing okay.

00:43:06.000 It seems like he's quarantining, but I thought he would be wheezy.

00:43:08.000 I think he stared COVID in the eyes and goes, you can't take me lower than I already am.

00:43:14.000 And COVID was like, yeah, yeah, yeah, sorry dude.

00:43:15.000 You know what, you're right.

00:43:17.000 I forced a meeting of the five COVID families and used Rico. 0.97

00:43:23.000 By the way, we have some personal info as well on YouTube that we've experienced, but YouTube said they're looking even further ways to decrease anyone who contradicts the election narrative.

00:43:33.000 Here's another quote.

00:43:34.000 Despite these encouraging results, we recognize there's always more to do.

00:43:38.000 For example, while problematic misinformation represents a fraction of 1% of what's watched on YouTube in the United States, we know we can bring that number down even more And some videos, while not recommended prominently on YouTube, yours truly, continue to get high views sometimes coming from other sites.

00:43:56.000 We're continuing to consider this and other new challenges as we make ongoing improvements.

00:44:03.000 One quick thing too, Tim Poole reported that YouTube clarified to him, so I don't know if I can necessarily, if I can confirm this.

00:44:11.000 Sure.

00:44:12.000 Have we heard any answer from YouTube at all?

00:44:14.000 We haven't had a comment yet.

00:44:15.000 Okay, we haven't had a comment yet.

00:44:16.000 Well, that's always heartening.

00:44:20.000 It seems to be the common response.

00:44:21.000 The two conditions that must be met, according to Tim Pool, a video to be removed is they must claim widespread fraud and error and say that it made Trump lose.

00:44:21.000 Nothing.

00:44:30.000 So you can still say there's evidence maybe of fraud, and you can still say that Trump actually won, but you cannot combine the two.

00:44:36.000 And here's what's crazy.

00:44:37.000 Talk about controlled opposition.

00:44:38.000 I'm not talking about some deep state mind control technique, but when you say, OK, listen, you can say that Donald Trump, you think Donald Trump won, OK, but you just can't substantiate it.

00:44:48.000 The opinion is, I think this election was unfair, or I don't think Biden won anyway.

00:44:54.000 They go, OK, well, what makes you think that?

00:44:56.000 Well, I can't tell you that.

00:44:58.000 Because you're a stranger.

00:44:58.000 Why?

00:44:59.000 If someone says, I think Donald Trump won because there are these thousands of votes from addresses that don't exist, thousands of votes from people out of state, thousands of votes from people underage, they're algorithmic, statistical, improbable, banned.

00:45:11.000 So what do you end up with?

00:45:12.000 YouTube ends up with liberals, NBC, ABC, CBS, Universal, Vox, Disney, right?

00:45:18.000 All of these.

00:45:19.000 Turner.

00:45:19.000 And then the conservative on there who just goes, I don't care what anybody says, I think Trump won.

00:45:25.000 They go, see?

00:45:26.000 See?

00:45:26.000 That's all conservatives have.

00:45:27.000 Because someone like us saying, well, this is why I actually think it was an unfair election.

00:45:30.000 And we point to the actual irregularities.

00:45:32.000 And the court briefings get banned.

00:45:35.000 Isn't that brilliant?

00:45:36.000 The way that they've kind of threaded the needle here to make it impossible to give A truly credible argument at this point, going forward, is they've said you can either say Trump won, but don't give the substantiating evidence, to which then anyone can go, if they had evidence they would have said it.

00:45:53.000 Exactly.

00:45:54.000 Or you can just say, without saying what the conclusion is, give the evidence, which is to say, oh, this number of votes was wrong, this number of votes were incorrect ballots, shouldn't have been counted, came in after a deadline, etc.

00:46:07.000 But you can't then tie it to the conclusion, which is, it's impacted the outcome of the election.

00:46:12.000 So now you can just give this, but it's irrelevant.

00:46:15.000 There's no context.

00:46:15.000 Okay, so 5,000 ballots.

00:46:17.000 What do you mean?

00:46:18.000 Well, I can't tell you what I mean by that.

00:46:19.000 I can't tell you how it impacts.

00:46:21.000 I can't tell you why it's relevant.

00:46:23.000 YouTube is trying to cultivate an environment where you can voice an opinion and not substantiate it.

00:46:30.000 What's being banned from YouTube right now, what causes a problem, is statistical, factual, legal substantiation.

00:46:38.000 You can say, I think Donald Trump won, or I think the election's unfair.

00:46:43.000 You just can't provide the sources and evidence, which is great, that makes perfect sense, because the people who've, you know, housed in YouTube Studios, the Young Turks, or places like NBC Vox, where they co-produce shows with them, They don't provide sources, so wonderful for them.

00:46:56.000 They stand no risk to run afoul of something that limits transparency.

00:47:01.000 But these are strange times that we live in, so we cannot talk about widespread voter fraud if we were to insinuate that that may have impacted the election.

00:47:08.000 However, from what I understand, and I don't understand much, YouTube can't stop us from thinking About widespread voter fraud which may have led to Donald Trump winning the election.

00:47:21.000 So, I'd like to take a moment and exercise that remaining right.

00:47:25.000 Alright.

00:47:53.000 Bye.

00:47:55.000 So we still have that going for us.

00:47:56.000 Are we still up?

00:47:57.000 I don't know if we're still up.

00:47:58.000 That felt good.

00:47:59.000 I like that.

00:48:00.000 Some Minority Report spiders are gonna crawl in here in a second. 1.00

00:48:03.000 I didn't even have to have the tinfoil this time.

00:48:06.000 You were about to say something earlier, sorry, and I had to cut you off for Crazy Rudy.

00:48:10.000 And I love Rudy Giuliani, but he's a little, you know, that's what makes him fun.

00:48:13.000 So what's interesting here is now you're starting to see more of kind of the true colors, right?

00:48:18.000 So you've always said, right?

00:48:19.000 Like, hey, you're a business.

00:48:20.000 You own the same way that you can decide who comes in your business, that kind of thing.

00:48:22.000 You just have to be open about it.

00:48:24.000 And you can't violate certain laws as they're related to who you're letting in your business.

00:48:28.000 And so with YouTube, now you're starting to see the true colors.

00:48:31.000 What's interesting is you aren't seeing those same true colors when it comes to Facebook and the stuff that they just randomly take off, throttle, remove, that kind of thing.

00:48:39.000 Do we have an answer yet from Facebook on why the biggest independent election stream was taken down?

00:48:44.000 No, they haven't even answered.

00:48:46.000 And you let them know that you're a lawyer, correct?

00:48:48.000 I did, I did.

00:48:49.000 I said, I was like, look, I'm a lawyer.

00:48:52.000 I don't know where my law degree is, so I didn't send it to them.

00:48:55.000 I will find it under, you know, in my mom's closet and take a photo and send it to them.

00:48:59.000 Your Honor, motion to dismiss.

00:49:01.000 Why? 0.98

00:49:02.000 We don't really give a shit. 0.99

00:49:04.000 It's a motion to confirm no shits given. 0.99

00:49:06.000 Yes, exactly. 0.99

00:49:08.000 No answer.

00:49:08.000 We're just taking down an election night from Facebook.

00:49:11.000 None.

00:49:11.000 Whatsoever.

00:49:12.000 Think about that for a second.

00:49:13.000 Millions of fans, millions of followers on Facebook, and we spent a substantial amount of money advertising on Facebook.

00:49:20.000 We don't need more, of course, because they courted me, reached out and said, hey, you want to spend money and grow your business on Facebook?

00:49:26.000 And then they ban the election stream and don't even answer, not only through the channels available, the email,

00:49:33.000 the contact forms, but an actual notice from a lawyer.

00:49:38.000 A reach out.

00:49:39.000 They don't answer.

00:49:40.000 How do you run a business?

00:49:43.000 Imagine that.

00:49:43.000 Imagine that's like, wait, hold a second.

00:49:45.000 You were going to build my house.

00:49:47.000 There's no house.

00:49:49.000 And you send an email, hey, where's my house?

00:49:52.000 I paid for a house.

00:49:53.000 And then you make a phone call, I paid for it, and then you have a lawyer saying, hey, we're gonna have a problem.

00:49:56.000 What happened to the house?

00:49:58.000 Just radio silence!

00:49:59.000 Must be nice to be worth 700 billion dollars!

00:50:03.000 Right.

00:50:03.000 Well, and I watched an entire CNN segment this morning that was supposed to be covering this.

00:50:07.000 They had two correspondents in there to talk about it.

00:50:09.000 I'm like, oh, a little bit of back and forth.

00:50:10.000 That'll be fantastic.

00:50:11.000 All they said, I swear to you, you can go back and watch this, all they said is that there was nothing there.

00:50:16.000 They didn't mention the statements that were made in the suit that General Paxton brought.

00:50:20.000 They didn't say any of the other states that came on.

00:50:22.000 No, of course they didn't.

00:50:22.000 They just said they didn't like the election results, and that was what they... I was like, this is your, like, billions of dollars budget to go out and produce something like that?

00:50:32.000 I don't like the YouTube search results!

00:50:34.000 Where's my restitution?

00:50:36.000 Where's my 40 acres and a digital mule emoji?

00:50:41.000 There's no question here, and when you look at all the antitrust... There are many questions here.

00:50:46.000 But there is, of all the questions, a question that is totally answered already is, Are all of these different companies at some level working together to make sure that there's a consistent lid, if we're using Joe Biden's words, a consistent lid on any questions or dissent going forward about where this is.

00:51:03.000 I mean, this is what's crazy, and this is why America is so great, is even though these companies are coming in and feel that they can suppress any discussion about this going forward, at least we still have a legal system that allows us to file these briefs.

00:51:15.000 But as General Paxton said, this is the last resort.

00:51:19.000 And I'm really tired, I will say this, I'm really tired of the Republicans out there grandstanding on 230 and not really doing a whole lot.

00:51:27.000 Listen, guys, let me tell you, I may have a major announcement here to make next week.

00:51:31.000 afterwards.

00:51:32.000 And I'm really tired, I will say this, I'm really tired of the Republicans out there

00:51:35.000 grandstanding on 230 and not really doing a whole lot.

00:51:37.000 Listen guys, let me tell you, I may have a major announcement here to make next week.

00:51:42.000 There's no cavalry come over the hill.

00:51:45.000 Not to be, unless it's people like us, but the people who are perpetually employed and

00:51:49.000 even if they're Republicans who fancy themselves bulldogs, there's some information out there

00:51:54.000 that we know has been presented to people who could do something about it and they don't

00:51:58.000 So there's a problem with that too, and we need to vote him out.

00:52:02.000 And we'll cross our t's and dot our s's. 0.99

00:52:03.000 But actually, I have someone here that's a slight disagreement with my lawyer, and because it's a little disagreement, he's going to kick my ass. 0.98

00:52:09.000 So comment if you're watching. 0.98

00:52:11.000 Just hit like, comment right now.

00:52:12.000 It's the best thing you can do if you're a freeloader and you won't join Mug Club.

00:52:16.000 Which may be our only place not too long from now.

00:52:19.000 You know, I've run into this quite a bit while you're talking about sort of the legal recourse.

00:52:23.000 Right.

00:52:24.000 That's also something that YouTube, when we're talking about 230, they don't even follow, and I know what you were saying about, let me explain this first, then you make your argument, and then I would like to make mine.

00:52:34.000 I think we're about to agree.

00:52:35.000 Oh no!

00:52:35.000 Okay.

00:52:36.000 YouTube enjoys protection of the platform, but they don't even follow laws as it relates to states.

00:52:41.000 They don't even follow state laws, meaning single-party, dual-party consent states.

00:52:46.000 Meaning that if you videotape someone, you record somebody in a single-party consent state, you don't need their permission.

00:52:53.000 That's how investigative journalism is done.

00:52:55.000 However, YouTube decides that they don't follow that.

00:52:59.000 So you just saw that right there.

00:53:01.000 We've had videos removed from people in single-party consent states, by the way, so we don't need to ask for their permission, who gave permission.

00:53:08.000 On camera!

00:53:09.000 I think, actually, in one case, written, and then afterwards said, well, I don't like the way that it turned out, so I want it removed, and they were removed.

00:53:16.000 Yeah.

00:53:17.000 Wow.

00:53:18.000 But that's not the state law, and I know you were saying they can go above and beyond the law on that front.

00:53:22.000 Well, so the law itself says that here's the threshold you're required.

00:53:26.000 If you don't follow the law, then you might have that content removed.

00:53:29.000 So illegal content that violates state law might be removed.

00:53:32.000 There's no obligation that they allow us to do it, to put it up.

00:53:36.000 But here's the biggest problem is they allow that content up all the time.

00:53:41.000 They allow Vice, Vox, CNN, TMZ, they allow all of this content up where the person has affirmatively not consented to be up there.

00:53:52.000 And they go, well, it's a single-party consent state.

00:53:54.000 Sorry, you've got to let it up.

00:53:56.000 But then when we do it, it's, oh, this random person who yelled in public, came into a place that clearly they knew

00:54:03.000 they were being done, they signed, they agreed in the video they were going to do 0.99

00:54:05.000 it, but then later they realized they said some stupid shit and they complained to YouTube 1.00

00:54:09.000 and YouTube goes, well I understand it's a single party consensus but we need 0.99

00:54:12.000 you to take it down.

00:54:13.000 Right.

00:54:13.000 That is the hypocrisy that's coming through on this particular issue.

00:54:17.000 And also I do think that it's a violation of law overall because if YouTube is going to be a

00:54:22.000 platform, right, you don't get to stop someone in a town square.

00:54:25.000 For example, let's say you're a police officer in a town square and someone is videotaping people in public and someone says, I don't want to be videotaped.

00:54:31.000 All the police officer can do is say, well, you get out of the town square.

00:54:33.000 So if you are enjoying the platform of being the digital town square, which is what you guys have claimed under 230, you do not get to say, actually, you have to stop filming.

00:54:43.000 Especially not if we say, hey, we're filming, someone agrees to it, or sits down, for example, and it changed my mind, where they clearly know there's a camera, and a camera, and a camera, and a camera, and a camera, and afterward they say, well, we don't want to do it, you take it down.

00:54:55.000 That's just, let's recap this really quickly.

00:54:57.000 YouTube can create a policy that says, we will remove any substantial claims, any substantiations of the idea that Donald Trump lost If it includes voter fraud, right?

00:55:07.000 Any claims of voter fraud resulting in the outcome of this election being in dispute, we will remove.

00:55:13.000 That's something they will enforce.

00:55:14.000 They do not enforce that when the left says that the 2016 election was hacked by the Russians and that Donald Trump was illegitimate.

00:55:22.000 Then we move down the list and it's, hey, you know what?

00:55:25.000 We enjoy the protections of 230 because we're a platform.

00:55:28.000 We are not a publisher.

00:55:30.000 And then they say, but you have to take this down because this person said they didn't want to be filmed.

00:55:34.000 We don't care if it's a single party consent state.

00:55:36.000 That can remove all investigative journalism from the right.

00:55:39.000 You've seen it with us.

00:55:39.000 We've experienced it.

00:55:40.000 You've seen it from people like James O'Keefe.

00:55:43.000 And then they say to Vice and these, or Vox, these other outlets.

00:55:46.000 No, no, no.

00:55:46.000 But in your case, as long as you're following state law, it's fine.

00:55:48.000 It gives them the selective process to determine what information you can and cannot see, and that is what a publisher does.

00:56:00.000 That needs to change now.

00:56:03.000 It's almost as bad as if YouTube reached out to creators and said, like, hey, hey, before you submit anything, let us review it and give you some changes, just like an editor at the New York Times.

00:56:14.000 The major point here is when you look at 230 and the protection that incorrect court decisions have allowed them to continue to do is to translate 230's good faith application of removal policies and say that oh it's okay for you to say you do it one way with regard to single-party consent but then do it a different way and the only difference Is because of the types of content that's being done.

00:56:38.000 The policies are exactly the same.

00:56:40.000 The ignoring or following a single consent law by the creator is exactly the same.

00:56:44.000 But you let some people do it when you're okay with the content and you don't let them do it when it's other creators with other content like your stuff.

00:56:50.000 And that's where you fall out of 230.

00:56:52.000 That's where you violate what 230 is.

00:56:54.000 You should no longer have the protection because you're no longer acting in good faith to remove that.

00:56:58.000 This is just when people get mad about the fact that they decided to try and leak, which is illegal, Donald Trump's tax returns and then not cover Hunter Biden.

00:57:07.000 Listen, that's you get mad at Fox News, CNN, ABC, NBC.

00:57:09.000 Great.

00:57:10.000 OK, we understand.

00:57:11.000 And also on Twitter, they allowed Trump's tax returns, but they punted the Hunter Biden story saying there was a violation of hacking.

00:57:18.000 Now take that and apply it across anywhere anyone can get information.

00:57:23.000 And then these people at YouTube and Facebook have the gall to bitch about echo chambers.

00:57:28.000 Yes! 0.93

00:57:29.000 Yes!

00:57:30.000 You! 0.99

00:57:31.000 You're the chamber!

00:57:32.000 When Half-Asian Bill reaches out to Facebook to say, hey, hold on a second, why did you ban our stream, stream, stream, stream?

00:57:40.000 It's just an echo!

00:57:41.000 Right.

00:57:41.000 Well, and this was our protection, right?

00:57:43.000 So this was the thing that we could go to to make sure that our voice was heard.

00:57:47.000 We went to these other platforms because we know the media wasn't going to necessarily cover all of the stories fairly.

00:57:52.000 This is how democracy, this democratic republic, dies.

00:57:56.000 It dies.

00:57:56.000 It dies here.

00:57:58.000 Because if we can't get out factual information that maybe isn't convenient for the people that own these companies, or maybe isn't convenient for a political viewpoint, you can never have freedom of speech again in this country.

00:58:09.000 You're just going to believe whatever you're told, right?

00:58:11.000 And so for any of you out there who are like, why do you keep talking about 230?

00:58:14.000 Because it is the very most important thing going on right now.

00:58:18.000 And if your representatives don't take action on it, get them out.

00:58:22.000 Get somebody else in.

00:58:26.000 No, there's some stuff I gotta do.

00:58:28.000 It may mean that I might not be able to do this show in this capacity for much longer.

00:58:33.000 If other people aren't going to step up, there's some stuff I gotta do.

00:58:36.000 So we'll have some announcements coming up.

00:58:37.000 What's that, Patient Bill?

00:58:38.000 You can't announce it.

00:58:40.000 No, I'm not announcing anything.

00:58:42.000 I'm just saying, don't be surprised if I'm not here doing this show as you see it now, because I'm not going to be one of those guys who, you know, you see these people on online message boards, and if we bleed together, we are brothers together.

00:58:54.000 What are you doing?

00:58:55.000 What are you doing?

00:58:55.000 Now, we've filed suits in the past where we've filed petitions of information, but there's more that I can do.

00:59:00.000 I just can't do it and do this at the same time.

00:59:03.000 So there's some decisions that have to be made because, yeah, I'm not gonna see the thread of our constitutional republic be tugged on and have the opportunity to do something and not do something about it.

00:59:12.000 And it requires a little more than... You know who's holding that thread?

00:59:14.000 I got the tingles.

00:59:15.000 It's Zuckerberg with his little alien finger.

00:59:20.000 Like Mr. Burns in the cornfield with nuclear radiation.

00:59:26.000 That's a great episode.

00:59:28.000 Is there something here that we want to watch?

00:59:30.000 Is that why this is up on here?

00:59:32.000 Georgia?

00:59:32.000 I think, yeah, I think it's Giuliani going through the security footage.

00:59:36.000 Okay, let's see this really quickly and then we'll talk about Hunter Biden.

00:59:40.000 But because the media was part of the cover up here, and we know it is, it wasn't done.

00:59:47.000 This is a horrible crime that's been committed against the American people.

00:59:51.000 Georgia has... Fact check.

00:59:53.000 They weren't suitcases.

00:59:56.000 Probably the piece of the most dramatic evidence.

00:59:58.000 You don't have the most cheating.

01:00:00.000 You didn't have to cheat as much.

01:00:01.000 I mean, the margin was only 10,000.

01:00:02.000 The most cheating, obviously, occurred in the places where they made the most money.

01:00:07.000 They're going to say, the margin was 12,000.

01:00:09.000 Pennsylvania.

01:00:09.000 Which, by the way, it was 14,000 plus before a recount without signature checks.

01:00:13.000 What is that?

01:00:14.000 What's a level of cheating?

01:00:15.000 I am guaranteeing that they're using this to, the policy is directed specifically to Giuliani stuff.

01:00:20.000 Like, the new policy, this is the kind of stuff that they're going to be like, oh, nope.

01:00:25.000 Oh, you're gonna try and ban us from listening?

01:00:26.000 Well, no, they might.

01:00:27.000 The policy's so vague, it's unclear.

01:00:29.000 Oh, then you know what?

01:00:30.000 You'll billable hours, Bill.

01:00:35.000 Because we let this happen.

01:00:37.000 We let this erosion of our free speech take place.

01:00:39.000 We let the erosion of our freedom of religion take place.

01:00:41.000 Let me ask you this, while we're talking about this right now, and people out there, there's back and forth, people go, oh, it's conjecture.

01:00:47.000 This is an election of the most important person in the free world.

01:00:50.000 Yeah.

01:00:51.000 Why do we not have the ability to simply check what votes went in at that time in those machines?

01:00:57.000 Yeah. The unconstitutional relaxation of ballot integrity protections. Right.

01:01:03.000 Hey, well, hold on a second. It happened between, what, 10 and 1?

01:01:06.000 Well, we weren't counting. We were tabulating. Okay. What was tabulated?

01:01:10.000 Yeah. And the answer on some of this stuff has been like, well,

01:01:13.000 these are the sorts of machines that you can't audit.

01:01:16.000 Yes. Right. What? They gave us the option.

01:01:19.000 You can't audit? You guys tell me. Is it unreasonable for me to say, well, okay,

01:01:23.000 how many went through with that?

01:01:24.000 Because it just happens to coincide with the dump that flipped the state.

01:01:28.000 Just those ones.

01:01:29.000 Look at those notes.

01:01:31.000 Go right in.

01:01:32.000 Open it up.

01:01:33.000 Go on through.

01:01:34.000 Use a pen.

01:01:35.000 I think you open it up and hidden in sign is a little Fauci.

01:01:41.000 It's the Indian in the ballot.

01:01:45.000 They don't have to show their work.

01:01:46.000 It's the Wizard of Ballots.

01:01:47.000 We just take the incompetence of the DMV and then you transfer all those people over to the state elections and there you go!

01:01:53.000 Pay no attention to the man in the ballot machine.

01:01:55.000 Yeah, nothing could go wrong.

01:01:56.000 They didn't debunk anything, they just said that they lied.

01:01:58.000 That was their claim.

01:01:59.000 They were like, no, no, no, no, no one, actually, no one was sent home.

01:02:03.000 And, uh, yeah.

01:02:06.000 We said, well, hold on a second.

01:02:07.000 You said people were sent home and you stopped counting.

01:02:09.000 No, no, no!

01:02:10.000 No, because what we said was, we said was, um, we sent people home and we stopped counting.

01:02:15.000 Said the election official.

01:02:16.000 Yeah, exactly.

01:02:17.000 Now we have this video.

01:02:18.000 But what happened is we didn't send anybody home.

01:02:21.000 We didn't stop counting.

01:02:22.000 We just did another bad thing.

01:02:24.000 Debunked!

01:02:25.000 Yeah.

01:02:25.000 You just got WAPOED!

01:02:27.000 Fact check.

01:02:28.000 You just proved my point, actually.

01:02:30.000 WAPOED. 0.87

01:02:31.000 Oh look, if they're about to show this video of this broad with the absentee ballots, it's like Giuliani has been watching our show.

01:02:39.000 I feel like way when I watch the news.

01:02:41.000 In one of these next hearings it's just going to be our six hour stream from next Thursday where we're driving from non-voting address to non-voting address and that's happening.

01:02:49.000 What is next Thursday?

01:02:49.000 What's the date?

01:02:50.000 Can someone let me know? 17.

01:02:54.000 Thursday the 17th, we'll have Dave Landau, some special guests.

01:02:57.000 We are trying to set this up.

01:02:59.000 Now listen, the connection might drop, so we have to stream here to this studio, and if it drops, it'll just drop for maybe 30 seconds to a minute.

01:03:05.000 Stay with us.

01:03:06.000 The reason for this is so many people say, well, the numbers, you don't really know. 0.95

01:03:10.000 We have done research, and we don't have enough time to show you all of the bullshit addresses, but we will drive in an RV. 0.91

01:03:18.000 That's the correct pronunciation, by the way. 1.00

01:03:20.000 Bullshit! 1.00

01:03:21.000 Bullshit! 1.00

01:03:22.000 Addresses, but we will drive from address to address to address to address for as long 1.00

01:03:25.000 as we have a tank of gas and show you the voter registration.

01:03:31.000 Where people voted from!

01:03:31.000 Which, by the way, is illegal!

01:03:33.000 Oh, no, no, no, irregularities, right?

01:03:35.000 Right, right, right.

01:03:36.000 Maybe irregularities.

01:03:37.000 You gotta say non-widespread fraud.

01:03:39.000 You can say, like, there was X tens of thousands of votes, but not... Can we get a definition of widespread?

01:03:46.000 I will say there are many, many tens of thousands, potentially hundreds of thousands of this example, of the kind of address example that you can find online, but We don't have time.

01:03:57.000 No.

01:03:57.000 We're still up.

01:03:57.000 Because we'll be in an RV, not a DeLorean, so I don't know how many we'll be able to show you, but I just think it's important that you see at least a couple dozen, right?

01:04:06.000 That way you know, hey, put a bullshit asshole address to the asshole name that they tell you doesn't exist. 0.99

01:04:14.000 It exists. 1.00

01:04:14.000 Some are empty lots. 1.00

01:04:16.000 Some are random boxes.

01:04:17.000 Some are just addresses on streets where the numbers have already ended.

01:04:20.000 Really?

01:04:21.000 We've done our due diligence, and we will be driving from address to address to address on Thursday.

01:04:26.000 We're taking a risk, and we just want you to go along with us.

01:04:29.000 Our last show of the year.

01:04:31.000 I don't expect it to be on for a very long time.

01:04:35.000 And look, when we're out there, I mean, you've made this point a number of times, which is, hey, guys, if you're sharing information... You're welcome to come.

01:04:41.000 No, no, I'm sending my Chinese spies. 1.00

01:04:43.000 Don't worry.

01:04:44.000 You're closer to them.

01:04:45.000 That just sounds like a party.

01:04:46.000 Yeah.

01:04:47.000 Hey, Swallow will be there.

01:04:50.000 Oh, no.

01:04:50.000 He doesn't share.

01:04:51.000 So look at it.

01:04:52.000 We've talked about this.

01:04:53.000 If you're sharing unvetted information as a conservative who's questioning what's going on in this election, and you haven't vetted that information, there's no doubt that well-meaning people are sharing bad information.

01:05:03.000 And that is creating a smokescreen that allows the WAPOs to come in and go, see, that one's bunk, that one's a bunk, that one's a bunk, that one's a bunk. 0.98

01:05:10.000 And it's like, okay, fine.

01:05:11.000 I didn't share those four.

01:05:12.000 These are the ones that really matter.

01:05:13.000 And that's what Paxson was saying was, look, some of that other stuff may or may not be good.

01:05:17.000 It's not what we're doing.

01:05:17.000 But what we are saying is indisputable facts about how these elections were run were run in violation of their own laws.

01:05:23.000 They set the rules.

01:05:24.000 They didn't follow them.

01:05:25.000 And it led to a potential impact on an election.

01:05:29.000 I haven't said which election.

01:05:31.000 No, it could be an election somewhere.

01:05:32.000 You never want to use the definitive article.

01:05:34.000 THE election.

01:05:34.000 We don't know what happens.

01:05:36.000 We don't know the inner workings of the parliamentary system in Botswana.

01:05:40.000 We don't.

01:05:40.000 I do.

01:05:41.000 It's true.

01:05:41.000 Whether this had an impact on it or not.

01:05:42.000 Son of a bitch. 1.00

01:05:43.000 Ghana? 1.00

01:05:44.000 Let's pick one that we don't know about.

01:05:45.000 They don't have a constitutional system or a parliamentary system.

01:05:47.000 Someone put me in a Santa suit and give me a kid to talk to.

01:05:47.000 I don't know.

01:05:53.000 Can I go back to something real quick?

01:05:54.000 You said something about this, but at the end of that first quote where they're saying that it impacted the 2020 U.S.

01:05:59.000 presidential election, this is the most laughable... Careful?

01:06:01.000 I know nothing!

01:06:03.000 This is what they said.

01:06:04.000 I'm reading their policy, right?

01:06:07.000 This is the most laughable part.

01:06:08.000 In line with our approach towards historical U.S.

01:06:12.000 presidential elections.

01:06:13.000 That last part.

01:06:15.000 It is.

01:06:16.000 This policy has been historically the same policy that you've had in previous... I know we covered talking about 16, but I like how they threw that in there right there on the thing.

01:06:25.000 Didn't even have to say that.

01:06:26.000 And said, it's just the same that we've been doing before.

01:06:30.000 YouTube's been around since 2005.

01:06:32.000 You did this for Bush.

01:06:32.000 Yeah.

01:06:35.000 Not Bush, I guess the end of his deal.

01:06:36.000 So Obama, you did this for that.

01:06:38.000 McCain and Romney.

01:06:39.000 Yeah.

01:06:39.000 You did it for that, too, right?

01:06:40.000 Well, I mean, those people were wieners and inconsequential, so they weren't really willing to fight. 1.00

01:06:45.000 They didn't really need to try and beat the fight out of Romney or McCain.

01:06:49.000 No, they just folded.

01:06:51.000 Certainly not Romney.

01:06:52.000 Yeah.

01:06:53.000 They just placed him on the top of their car like he did their dogs.

01:06:56.000 Yeah, they grabbed his ponytail.

01:06:58.000 Exactly, they grabbed it!

01:07:03.000 Holy underwear wedgie! 1.00

01:07:11.000 No, I think holy underwear doesn't wedge.

01:07:13.000 Oh, that's true.

01:07:14.000 It's very thick.

01:07:15.000 We speak of holy things.

01:07:16.000 Speaking of Hunter Biden!

01:07:19.000 Hey, by the way, many people may not remember this.

01:07:22.000 10% of Americans said it would have changed their vote had they heard about the Hunter Biden story.

01:07:25.000 I don't know if you can bring that up there at some point, or have someone send it there to Tokunawa, because I do have some other overlays here, but Hunter Biden now is the subject of a federal tax investigation.

01:07:36.000 What?

01:07:37.000 It just happened, right?

01:07:38.000 This is breaking news.

01:07:39.000 He confirmed it.

01:07:40.000 Of course, this is breaking news that was reported in October.

01:07:45.000 Wait.

01:07:48.000 Maybe this is the component that Tucker Carlson lost in the mail?

01:07:52.000 I remember, you remember way back in the October days?

01:08:00.000 Yeah.

01:08:01.000 When we were like, why isn't this...

01:08:02.000 What?

01:08:03.000 Bigger story, right?

01:08:04.000 This is, what?

01:08:05.000 And it was taken off Twitter.

01:08:07.000 It was taken off Twitter.

01:08:08.000 It was taken off Twitter and said it was hacked.

01:08:10.000 It wasn't hacked.

01:08:11.000 He was so strung out on crack and foot jobs that he left his computer with Geek Squad.

01:08:18.000 There was nothing illegal.

01:08:21.000 It's not his fault.

01:08:22.000 He didn't even wake up.

01:08:24.000 I think the rule was that 60 days or 90 days, whatever it was, it was past that rule.

01:08:28.000 He didn't even come back after a 90-day crack and foot job stupor and go, hey, I didn't leave my incredibly incriminating laptop here, did I?

01:08:36.000 He didn't even have that awareness.

01:08:39.000 But Jack Dorsey decided that they were going to remove the Hunter Biden story. 0.98

01:08:45.000 And they were the ones stupid enough to outright Yeah, it looks like the number was 1 in 6 Biden voters would have changed their minds if they had known the full story. 0.97

01:08:52.000 1 in 6 Biden voters would have changed their minds? 1.00

01:08:55.000 What's the margin in swing states?

01:08:56.000 So let's not even talk about the widespread fraud, which of course never happened, and this hearing isn't going on, and we didn't just have the Texas AG, right?

01:09:05.000 None of that!

01:09:06.000 Figment of your imagination!

01:09:07.000 Nothingness!

01:09:08.000 I'm thinking about it!

01:09:09.000 It doesn't matter!

01:09:10.000 Stop it! 0.99

01:09:11.000 I'm thinking about it!

01:09:12.000 It's not!

01:09:14.000 It is not a fair election because of the fact that the media controls all this information.

01:09:20.000 If you take away the fact that they completely suppressed the Biden story, that they'd amplified the Russia story, that they'd amplified the impeachment story, that they'd amplified Donald Trump's tax returns, let me ask you this.

01:09:31.000 How many times did you hear in the mainstream media that we had unemployment at 3.6%?

01:09:36.000 When did you ever hear that?

01:09:41.000 Ever!

01:09:42.000 When did you ever hear that more Americans had dollars in their pockets, both in their paycheck and saving from their paycheck paying in taxes?

01:09:49.000 When did you ever hear about that?

01:09:50.000 When did you ever hear in the media that the average family household income went up $5,000 under Donald Trump, where it was $1,000 under the entirety of Obama's administration?

01:10:02.000 When did you ever hear that?

01:10:04.000 None of it.

01:10:05.000 You heard none of that information.

01:10:07.000 It wasn't a fair election because these big tech billionaire oligarchies effectively decided that it could not be.

01:10:14.000 And by the way, while we're talking about this, I do think that businesses have the right to make political donations.

01:10:19.000 We're talking about Citizens United.

01:10:21.000 Again, you don't know about that case.

01:10:22.000 What that was was Hillary Clinton actually trying to ban an anti-Hillary Clinton film. 1.00

01:10:27.000 But Democrats talk about how they're against big money in politics.

01:10:30.000 How about the $350 million from one guy, Zuckerberg?

01:10:34.000 To get out the vote campaigns.

01:10:37.000 How about that?

01:10:38.000 You don't have a problem with that?

01:10:39.000 So let's not act like this is a fair election regardless of the hundreds of thousands of voters that either don't exist or out of state, underage, or double voted.

01:10:47.000 Illegally voted.

01:10:48.000 So one thing, and I'll say this may be a controversial opinion, there is a distinction between Influencing, rigging, and fraud.

01:10:57.000 Right.

01:10:57.000 And I would say that at a certain level, there could even be violations of campaign finance laws through supporting a particular candidate or belief or set of systems or a party through your actions that may not be fraud, because fraud is lying or not lying.

01:11:12.000 So what's interesting about the Hunter Biden thing is the timing of going through and saying, we're not going to let this information out.

01:11:18.000 Right.

01:11:19.000 That may not be fraud under a legal standard, but without question, it was influence.

01:11:23.000 Without question it was trying to rig the election so that information was not getting

01:11:27.000 out that clearly citizens would have been using, and that was demonstrably at the time

01:11:33.000 true, under an argument that we don't let this kind of information out because it was

01:11:37.000 found surreptitiously.

01:11:39.000 When you let that information out all the time on other topics.

01:11:43.000 That's where the phrase fake news comes from, is where the left was saying that all of these

01:11:48.000 Facebook headlines were deceiving and that was the reason that Trump was elected.

01:11:53.000 But they can point out the media influence, and they can also point out some kind of fraud that might have happened in 2016, but we can't.

01:12:02.000 Hey, by the way, really quickly, can you bring back up that Swalwell clip?

01:12:04.000 Yeah.

01:12:05.000 Let's bring that back up because, you know, Swalwell, who was banging Asian spies... Certainly. 0.97

01:12:10.000 He can't tell whether it's the same one or multiple.

01:12:17.000 He's just in a pool of Asian spies like Gary Oldman in the awful rendition of Dracula. 1.00

01:12:25.000 So it's just Eric Swalwell and pointy tits. 0.90

01:12:30.000 Let's play the Swalwell clip because there's something in there that he said that I think might be relevant to the Hunter Biden scenario. 0.98

01:12:35.000 Play it.

01:12:36.000 But the wrongdoing here, Jim, is that At the same time this story was being leaked out is the time that I was working on impeachment on the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees.

01:12:46.000 And if this is a country where People who criticize the president are going to have law enforcement information weaponized against them.

01:12:53.000 That's not a country that any of us want to live in.

01:12:55.000 And I hope it is investigated as to who leaked this information.

01:12:58.000 So his problem was with selective leaking, right?

01:13:02.000 Well, we know that intelligence agencies, I don't know, maybe Tocanaga can grab this, I don't know if it was the CIA or FBI or the Internal Revenue Service, had Hunter Biden's laptop while the story was being covered in October.

01:13:14.000 FBI.

01:13:15.000 It was the FBI?

01:13:15.000 I believe it was the FBI.

01:13:16.000 The FBI had the laptop.

01:13:20.000 And decided to hold on to that until after the election.

01:13:22.000 We're suave on that.

01:13:24.000 I know you have a problem when someone's leaking your leaking on an Asian spy prostitute, but where are you when it comes to drip drip, you know, buttoning this up and fixing the leak in the pipe so that nobody knows and people are made to feel crazy if they say this Hunter Biden story is really important because it could compromise the next leader of the free world.

01:13:44.000 They had access to it all this time.

01:13:46.000 Yeah.

01:13:47.000 How about the selective leaking outrage there?

01:13:50.000 You're a conspiracy theorist.

01:13:51.000 Yeah, pretty much.

01:13:52.000 And it's not like... So, CNN, I was telling you... I mean, you understand the point that I'm making?

01:13:55.000 Yeah, yeah, absolutely.

01:13:55.000 Well, as well as saying, oh, the real problem is, isn't it suspect that they're leaking this now?

01:13:59.000 I would argue, sure.

01:14:01.000 But... 1.00

01:14:05.000 You did have sex with Asian spies. 0.99

01:14:08.000 You can literally deal with both of those things at the same time. 0.99

01:14:11.000 You can deal with both of those things.

01:14:12.000 You can say, hey, wait a minute, we need to figure out how these investigations are being compromised and how it's being released.

01:14:17.000 That doesn't change... You didn't un-bang the bell.

01:14:20.000 Un-bang the fang. 0.67

01:14:23.000 You didn't do it.

01:14:25.000 Well look, I had to watch that same segment.

01:14:26.000 Just hold on a second. 1.00

01:14:27.000 General rule of thumb, just don't have sex with any Chinese women anymore. 1.00

01:14:30.000 They're not really that into you. 0.99

01:14:32.000 No, I wouldn't be around.

01:14:34.000 No, I wouldn't even be here.

01:14:35.000 Chinese men are fine.

01:14:37.000 Steven, we have it the wrong way.

01:14:38.000 He actually recruited her.

01:14:39.000 He was like, please involve me in a scandal so that I'll be on the news again.

01:14:43.000 I need to be relevant.

01:14:44.000 I want people to care.

01:14:45.000 He told her he was president-elect because that's just...

01:14:48.000 It's the other office of President-elect.

01:14:50.000 Well, it gets even worse.

01:14:51.000 So CNN, not only did they say that this is breaking news, I watched a segment this morning on this as well, they had the balls to say it was because of the intrepid reporting of blah blah blah, our reporter, and people shaking their heads.

01:15:03.000 Yes, did a fantastic job uncovering this.

01:15:06.000 So what did you do?

01:15:07.000 Go back and watch our clips from October to get your information?

01:15:09.000 Because this is not only not breaking, you didn't do a damn thing to get the information!

01:15:14.000 I bet you know that if they've come out and said he's under investigation now, it must be really bad.

01:15:20.000 Yeah.

01:15:21.000 Because just what we have is really bad.

01:15:24.000 And what's funny is former Vice President Joe Biden released a statement saying that he was deeply proud of his son.

01:15:35.000 That was really his only commentary.

01:15:37.000 And you know what?

01:15:37.000 Listen, we can see why.

01:15:39.000 Yeah, he has every reason to be proud.

01:15:44.000 So many things to be proud of.

01:15:47.000 Man, I hope I can raise a son.

01:15:49.000 And they're gonna get him on his taxes!

01:15:51.000 Look, Hunter, you're in the news! 0.96

01:15:53.000 It's like Al Capone if Al Capone were the former vice president's retarded son. 1.00

01:16:00.000 Can you just, I just can't wait when we see him designing the new, what is it, he's gonna go out to the Rose Garden, you know, it's gonna be Hunter Biden, and you're like, why are all these roses white?

01:16:09.000 Why are they so powdery?

01:16:11.000 That's weird.

01:16:12.000 That's strange, man.

01:16:13.000 Are these poppies?

01:16:14.000 Are you throwing poppies at me?

01:16:16.000 It's the poppies!

01:16:17.000 So hey, hey, Bill, just to clarify, so taxes, right?

01:16:20.000 Regarding, his taxes regarding his influence, his business dealings, where?

01:16:25.000 It's not, you know, it's not clear.

01:16:28.000 It's either Vermont or China. 0.96

01:16:30.000 Oh, oh, it could be China.

01:16:31.000 China, Vermont.

01:16:32.000 Like there's a place called Egypt, uh, Texas.

01:16:35.000 Yeah.

01:16:36.000 Mexico, Missouri.

01:16:37.000 So the place that Biden is going to be tougher on than Donald Trump.

01:16:41.000 Yeah.

01:16:42.000 So I'm just making sure I can connect all of the dots here.

01:16:45.000 For crying out loud, the Vibes were having cocktail parties with Swalwells. 1.00

01:16:50.000 They were probably handing out numbers for their masseuses.

01:16:53.000 You really think they're It's that hard to connect the dots?

01:16:56.000 You think I'm some serial killer with yarn?

01:16:58.000 Hold on a second.

01:17:00.000 No, wait.

01:17:00.000 We really only need three points of contact.

01:17:02.000 Hunter Biden, crack cocaine foot jobs from Chinese hookers and Chinese business dealings. 0.99

01:17:09.000 Eric Swalwell, banging Chinese spies. 0.99

01:17:12.000 Joe Biden!

01:17:13.000 There you go!

01:17:14.000 Connected the dots!

01:17:15.000 It's like a children's menu at Denny's!

01:17:17.000 I can't wait.

01:17:18.000 There's gonna be the next policy that comes out that's like under the spam and scam, right?

01:17:21.000 It's gonna be like... The integrity of the first son needs to be respected.

01:17:29.000 He needs his space to sow his wild crack.

01:17:33.000 That was even easier than the six degrees of Kevin Bacon.

01:17:35.000 So that was nice.

01:17:35.000 I like it.

01:17:36.000 Let's go really quickly to the Georgia hearing.

01:17:38.000 And by the way, the best thing you guys can do, if you're watching right now, The Archive, just comment something.

01:17:42.000 We're doing an Ask Me Anything next Thursday, where we will be streaming live December 17th.

01:17:46.000 All of these addresses, and we'll be taking your questions in your chat.

01:17:49.000 So load them up!

01:17:50.000 And no question is too uncomfortable, though I don't promise I'll answer.

01:17:53.000 All the way back into counties in Kentucky, or in your case, Georgia.

01:18:00.000 All right, that's enough about that part of it.

01:18:05.000 It's important to understand at a very high level sort of how the Dominion system works.

01:18:11.000 Can you explain it in a way that resembles paint drying?

01:18:14.000 I'm already on it.

01:18:19.000 I have been told that my voice is quite similar in frequency to that of crickets getting busy.

01:18:27.000 Or as we say in the South, In the middle of the road with a dead armadillo and a lone star candlelight.

01:18:35.000 What are you talking about?

01:18:36.000 We southerners don't make sense.

01:18:38.000 He's not even watching paint dry.

01:18:40.000 The paint's already dry.

01:18:41.000 Now this is paint eroding.

01:18:44.000 I think what he's saying is that the computers were connected to the internet.

01:18:47.000 That's a big thing.

01:18:48.000 And this is the problem, too.

01:18:49.000 That's why we wanted to have Attorney General Ken Paxson on the show to try and boil this down.

01:18:54.000 Listen, I will tell you this.

01:18:55.000 There are too many Spocks in the conservative movement, as you see right there. 1.00

01:18:58.000 Not enough Kirk.

01:18:59.000 So it's great to have information.

01:19:00.000 That information needs to get to people who can distill it, communicate it, delegate it, and Fight with it.

01:19:06.000 And I tell you what, we see a lot of people presenting information.

01:19:09.000 We don't see a lot of people out there, certainly with our elected officials, fighting with that information.

01:19:15.000 Fighting the information war.

01:19:16.000 Actually going to war for the American people who elected them.

01:19:19.000 We do not see that enough.

01:19:21.000 Do you know how you can confirm that's true?

01:19:26.000 You're shocked when you see it.

01:19:28.000 The fact that everyone is going, Lion Ted!

01:19:31.000 Lion.

01:19:31.000 He went from Lying Ted to Lion Ted because he's willing to go forward and argue at the Supreme Court.

01:19:38.000 That shouldn't be an event.

01:19:39.000 That should be the rule, not the exception.

01:19:43.000 And we have seen time after time people sit on the sidelines who were not brought into office to sit on the sidelines. 0.53

01:19:50.000 And then they bitch about Donald Trump and how he's a bull in a china shop. 0.93

01:19:54.000 You know what? 1.00

01:19:55.000 Maybe he wouldn't have to be a bull in a china shop if some of you guys just went in there and bought some shit. 0.99

01:20:00.000 Took some stuff off the shelves every now and then. 0.99

01:20:03.000 We shouldn't need one guy.

01:20:05.000 We shouldn't hope for one.

01:20:06.000 And I don't believe that he's one guy.

01:20:07.000 I don't believe that there's any savior to the political party.

01:20:10.000 But I am at the point right now Where if the Republicans who we've elected, conservatives who we've elected, haven't done enough, if they sit in the silence and go, well here's some information that maybe you might want to look into, hey, how about you look into it?

01:20:22.000 How about you do your due diligence so that I don't have to work 15 hours a day actually confirming it, and then you go forward and fight because you have the legal standing to do so? 0.98

01:20:30.000 How about you stop being pussies because guess what? 1.00

01:20:33.000 You don't deserve any of our votes! 1.00

01:20:36.000 Whoa, really?

01:20:36.000 You just think, oh, are you going to... No, I'm not going to vote for a Democrat.

01:20:39.000 That's not what I'm saying.

01:20:40.000 Whoa, what about the future of the Constitution?

01:20:42.000 What about the future of the democracy?

01:20:43.000 Guess what?

01:20:44.000 You're not protecting it!

01:20:46.000 You're not protecting it!

01:20:47.000 If you're not doing enough at this point, Republicans out there, there are a lot of people, myself included, out there going, hey, you know what?

01:20:53.000 What we've been doing isn't working.

01:20:55.000 They don't seem to be... Not only do you not seem to be fighting for us in the way that you have been overwhelmingly requested to, You don't seem like the kind of person who would even understand the language that we're all speaking here at a party.

01:21:09.000 Seems to me like you would be confused if we bring up that Georgia video, or if we bring up the voting rolls, or if we bring up the idea of unconstitutionality and legislating from the bench in Pennsylvania.

01:21:19.000 Seems to me that a lot of these Republican representatives will be like, well, I don't know, that's for the course to decide, I don't know, I've seen a lot of conspiracies.

01:21:24.000 Hey, hey, how about you take it upon yourselves here, since you have resources, for crying out loud, endless resources, you're welcome, tax dollars, here's more, and start getting to the bottom of this, and at least using what we have publicly available to Fight.

01:21:39.000 Okay?

01:21:40.000 That's why we're here right now and that's why we'll be here as long as we can and I will do the show as long as I can until my role in fighting might have to change because I am getting sick and tired of folks who aren't doing anything.

01:21:52.000 Let not your heart be troubled in that this country has some great safeguards.

01:21:56.000 It really does.

01:21:57.000 And there's never the end of the Constitutional Republic.

01:21:59.000 People said that with Bill Clinton.

01:22:00.000 People said that with Barack Obama.

01:22:02.000 But we are at a tipping point in this country, and we are at a tipping point where there isn't that cavalry coming over the hill because they don't care.

01:22:12.000 A lot of them.

01:22:12.000 Not all of them.

01:22:13.000 I'm not talking about people like Ted Cruz.

01:22:15.000 I'm not talking about people like Ken Paxton.

01:22:17.000 But how many other Republicans can you name Who are in the faces non-stop of the people who you know are lying and supporting big tech throttling and censoring conservative voices.

01:22:28.000 How many?

01:22:29.000 How many do you see signing on?

01:22:31.000 You had a New York AG who had to file this suit against Facebook.

01:22:35.000 You guys have had four years!

01:22:38.000 What have you done?

01:22:39.000 Now all of a sudden we're going to talk about 230 with the, what is it, the defense bill that Donald Trump is talking about?

01:22:45.000 Now all of a sudden, when we're in a lame duck presidency, we're going to do something?

01:22:49.000 You had four years and it's all people talked about.

01:22:54.000 And now you're surprised at what happened with the election?

01:22:57.000 You're surprised that people are saying there's no evidence?

01:23:00.000 You're surprised that now YouTube is saying, hey, we've broken them up Right?

01:23:04.000 So now they'll all hang separately.

01:23:06.000 We've broken them up so they're alone.

01:23:07.000 We've instituted this mental warfare and told them that there's no evidence.

01:23:11.000 We can now just remove them from the face of the dialogue and it's because you guys did nothing.

01:23:17.000 And you know what?

01:23:19.000 At least At least I'm going to do what I can to try and start holding you guys accountable.

01:23:22.000 And that means both the left, because we know what our enemy is.

01:23:24.000 But like I talked about this, and when I say enemy, I mean political enemy, ideological enemy.

01:23:29.000 I'm not like some Michigan representative who looks like RuPaul, calling people soldiers, asking them to harm people who disagree with me.

01:23:35.000 I'm talking about an ideological enemy at this point.

01:23:38.000 That's not a tough pill to swallow.

01:23:40.000 Like we talked about, you know what?

01:23:41.000 It's not tough for me to understand that some hipster coffee shop in Austin is going to force everyone to wear masks and walk around with ski poles to make sure that they're six feet apart.

01:23:49.000 What is a tough pill for me to swallow is a church saying, well, you know what?

01:23:54.000 We don't really need to meet to be the congregation of God.

01:23:57.000 Yeah, you do!

01:23:58.000 You're just using your faith as an excuse for your cowardice. 0.62

01:24:01.000 It's, it's, it's...

01:24:03.000 It's an easier pill to swallow for me to say, well, okay, of course we see Elizabeth Warren wanting people banned who disagree with them. 0.99

01:24:08.000 Well, okay, of course we see people at dinner parties with Zuckerberg and Wojcicki and these politicians who are influencing our elections and banning opinions.

01:24:14.000 We expect that.

01:24:15.000 It's like a disobedient child.

01:24:17.000 You expect them to be that way.

01:24:18.000 But when you have the adults in the room, when you have Republicans saying, well, we need to just let the system play out.

01:24:24.000 Guess what?

01:24:25.000 The system plays out when you play your role.

01:24:29.000 Fix it.

01:24:30.000 Alright, we're gonna go right now.

01:24:31.000 Leave a comment, that's the best thing you can do.

01:24:33.000 If you don't want to, I understand.

01:24:35.000 It burns to touch a keyboard, but we do ask that you join up at Mug Club.

01:24:39.000 There's going to be quite a bit more show where we will be taking your chats after this.

01:24:44.000 YouTube, go ahead and try and ban me, why don't ya?

Louder with Crowder - December 10, 2020

EXCLUSIVE! Texas AG interview discussing SCOTUS SUIT! | Good Morning #MugClub

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript