On this week's episode of Mug Club, the boys discuss the fallout from the DOJ's decision to indict Hillary Clinton on criminal charges related to her campaign finance violations, and whether or not they will seek to seek a mistrial in the case. They also discuss why they think the DOJ should have been given more leeway in their investigation into the matter, and what they would do if they were. They also talk about the possibility of a possible ban from the mug club.
00:00:42.000I mean, I look at all these young muglovers' faces, and I think... I made every wrong choice a late-twenties, early-thirty-year-olds guy could make.
00:00:56.000I, uh... I pissed off all the social media giants.
00:01:02.000I pushed away every Hollywood agent who's ever represented me.
00:01:08.000You know, when you come out as a conservative, things get taken from you.
00:01:38.000The inches we need are everywhere around this Mug Club.
00:01:43.000In this Mug Club, we fight for that inch.
00:01:48.000In this Mug Club, we tear ourselves to pieces, throw ourselves at super videos, we change minds, and we even make sh**ty jokes for that inch.
00:02:01.000Because we know, when we add up all those Mug Club ballots, and all those minds changed, that's gonna mean the f***ing difference between winning or losing!
00:02:15.000And either we vote now, as one Mug Club, or we get banned.
00:04:25.000Eastern, no matter what, but because there's been so much fallout and quite a few follow-ups on yesterday's story regarding the DOJ and corruption therein, we certainly feel as though you Are entitled to it.
00:04:40.000It's been ruined But this is a live show and so if at some point today if you're watching on YouTube Especially considering what we are covering and what has happened on social media since yesterday if at some point you see this Head on over to Rumble.
00:04:58.000We're going to be talking about that today.
00:04:59.000We're going to be talking about Facebook meta-censoring the story from yesterday.
00:05:02.000A major announcement that is going to be taking place while we are live on air.
00:05:05.000This was announced yesterday at 10pm, as I understand it, on our Newswire, that Merchant is going to be making a statement today as to whether the sentencing will be pushed to sometime after the election, perhaps.
00:06:46.000Most important, though, by the way, before anything else, of course, we talked about this earlier this week, but Brian Stelter is back at CNN.
00:07:16.000Before we go on to the fallout here and what's been happening, and we appreciate your support, of course, Mug Club, in sharing the story and reaching the many tens of millions of people who it has reached.
00:07:28.000Before, of course, Big Tech decided to try and clamp down on it.
00:10:24.000For those who are tuning in, we always have new viewers for tuning in because of the investigative journalism that you saw yesterday, and that's equally important, but this is a comedy show and we are children.
00:10:35.000Good thing we make the references publicly available so you know when it's a joke and when it's not, but hey, who really cares at this point?
00:10:45.000For those who didn't see this, and we appreciate you continuing to share this, by the way, because it has reached people who... It's reached people who don't want to cover this, and they've been forced to cover it.
00:10:57.000But for those who haven't seen it, here's a short clip.
00:11:01.000Again, just sort of reintroducing to you this undercover journalism from Mug Club Undercover.
00:11:06.000They've done a fantastic job that showed a DOJ official who All but admitted that, of course, the prosecution of Donald Trump, it's all been a political witch hunt and it's lawfare.
00:11:19.000That's why, like, the surging of the police is, you know, it's a perversion of justice.
00:11:26.000You know, stacking charges and, like, rearranging things just to make it fit a case.
00:11:31.000No, to be honest with you, I think the case is nonsense.
00:11:35.000And before I get into the fallout, some of which is kind of terrifying, this is the importance not only of you, but this is where what used to be called new media is important.
00:11:46.000You know, you can circumvent those in power.
00:11:50.000ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, none of them, they never would have covered this before, but you can make sure that people see the truth.
00:11:57.000And now that is applied pressure where even places like the New York Post and CNN were forced to cover it.
00:12:44.000It's a complete perversion of justice, a mockery of justice, to use his words.
00:12:48.000Everyone in the Southern District of New York knows it, and that the Manhattan D.A., Alvin Bragg, brought the manipulated charges basically to just try and, you know, chase some fame and make a name for himself.
00:12:58.000So the New York Post covers it, and then this guy, who we said was not the villain in this story, to be clear.
00:13:03.000He was saying what we knew to be true, unfortunately only saying it privately, He tried to cover and made it so much worse.
00:13:10.000He said, I was recently made aware of a video where I regretfully made some statements in a private and social setting that don't reflect my views about two local and state prosecutions.
00:13:21.000I said these things in an effort to please and impress someone I just met.
00:14:25.000Yeah, let me say it over multiple dates, the same thing again and again.
00:14:29.000So, by the way, another potential fallout from this, like we said, the judge in Trump's New York money, the hush money case in New York, they decided to move things along more quickly.
00:15:10.000So, originally the sentencing was scheduled for September 18th, and this judge is going to decide on Trump's immunity, which would relate to throwing out the case on September 16th.
00:15:20.000There was no notice of what is taking place today, but it was announced at, well, yesterday, the story goes out regarding the DOJ, all of these cases being politically motivated by someone who was an insider who's since tried to recant because he was impressing a lady by talking about lawfare at the DOJ.
00:15:49.000It could go either way where they may want to get away from this and they may just want to punt it to after the election so that you don't stay on top of it and no one cares about the political witch hunt or They may want to try and double down and say, no, we're going to move this up because all of this, this is fake news.
00:16:26.000So that's an important aspect of it that folks have, it's really flown under the radar is the potential conflict of a direct family member, Blood, helping someone who has a very deep political interest in going after a political opponent.
00:16:40.000But remember, there's one thing that's important here.
00:16:41.000This was a DOJ spokesman talking about the State Department.
00:16:46.000So the local district attorney's office, the DOJ being the premier, you know, federal court and the Southern District of New York being the number one trial court.
00:16:54.000They know how the trial system works and they were talking about Alvin Bragg in the Manhattan DA's office about the bad motivations and going after the case.
00:17:04.000It really is like you could almost not get any more closer to the action on someone who knows what's going on and goes into it and saying this was brought for bad reasons.
00:17:16.000Someone who is a judge, a sitting judge, whose daughter directly may be helping or is helping the Kamala Hmm.
00:17:23.000Biden campaign, Kamala Walls campaign, whatever it is at this point, I guess.
00:17:27.000Kamala Walls sounds like a theme park.
00:17:50.000I don't want to do the whataboutism thing, but I do feel like this is a good point to highlight the left basically saying that Supreme Court justices and other judges around the country should recuse themselves from trials.
00:18:01.000I think the Florida judge actually said she should recuse herself because Donald Trump appointed her.
00:18:06.000Okay, so all the judges that have been appointed by this person are just in the bag for this person now?
00:18:11.000That's not how the judicial system is supposed to work.
00:18:13.000Yeah, they want Clarence Thomas to be thrown out because he accepted some Sherry's Berries or whatever the hell it is.
00:18:19.000And in this case, the judge's daughter is working directly for a political opponent.
00:18:28.000And there's no predicate crime, you know.
00:18:31.000For all of us looking over here, when he said, basically, in his jury instructions, you have to find him guilty of an underlying crime.
00:18:38.000It could be one of these four or five different things, but you guys don't all have to agree on what one crime he actually committed.
00:18:44.000Is that as crazy to you as it is to just the layperson?
00:18:48.000It's crazy and the worst part is this wasn't like a last minute thing where folks were like, oh wow, this mistake happened at the last minute.
00:18:56.000People have been highlighting this issue because the jury instructions don't just magically appear right at the last minute.
00:19:02.000You have to submit them, you have to argue over them.
00:19:04.000So the Senate Judiciary Committee has highlighted this issue about how the lack of an underlying specific crime and just saying, well if 92 of you, I mean there's only, you know, 92 on a jury, but 92 of you vote once on 92 different crimes.
00:19:19.000We're gonna put them all together and call them one crime.
00:19:22.000It doesn't make sense at a smell test, even if you're not in the law.
00:19:26.000Those in the law know that this is absolutely not the way it's supposed to be, which is frankly just consistent with the entire prosecution at the state level.
00:19:35.000It's almost like it's a perversion of justice.
00:19:58.000It's one of the most contested issues in a jury trial is asking the right question.
00:20:03.000For those who are all on, you know, Chad GPT, it's asking the right prompt.
00:20:08.000If you're not going to ask the right prompt, you're not going to get the right answer.
00:20:10.000So if you're deliberately manipulating the question to make it as easy as possible, regardless of the law, you know the result you're trying to get.
00:20:25.000And then of course you have the chief spokesperson officer there in Biase of the Southern District of New York saying Nicholas and saying it is, that's what it is.
00:20:33.000People want to make a name for themselves.
00:20:40.000And let me, before we go to the big tech throttling, which this is Hunter Biden, the laptop all over again, spoiler alert, and this is kind of the scary part.
00:21:31.000That moment does not come in life very often, if at all, and he passed it by to make sure that he could keep some semblance of his job and life together instead of doing the right thing.
00:21:42.000And again, we'll talk about this, we have one dropping every week as far as Mug Club Undercover, and you know that we don't take these lightly.
00:21:52.000There are some people, these subjects, who you feel bad for, and you plead with them, you go, look, please, if you could do this all again, would you just do it differently?
00:22:00.000When you look at some of the consequences, the stealing of a nation, and then you realize, unless these people feel some kind of a sting, they'll continue.
00:22:08.000And they'll continue, and the worst part is, you don't know until they're caught.
00:23:08.000But what they mean is this one URL on the Rumble, this one URL here, this video that is going viral right now, we can't review it, and so it doesn't match our community standards.
00:23:16.000And that's a language that they use very often.
00:24:20.000The guy, he was doing what he could to start a nation.
00:24:25.000Here's what it would have looked like yesterday, and of course all references are available at lottocreditor.com.
00:24:31.000We put that link in the description with every show.
00:24:32.000If you were trying to share this story regarding corruption at the DOJ, straight from the horse's mouth, this is what happened if you were on Facebook.
00:26:17.000You may not like investigative journalism.
00:26:19.000Of course, the left now doesn't believe in investigative journalism.
00:26:22.000They think it's underhanded, so they don't do it anymore.
00:26:24.000They just do, you know, what would you do with John Quinones where every parent is racist?
00:26:27.000So, this information, do you think it would affect The American voter, if they understood that lawfare was at play, if they understood that there was a weaponization taking place with our intelligence agencies, with our Justice Department, do you think it would affect the outcome of this election?
00:26:44.000Well, good thing we have an example of this.
00:26:48.000Facebook, of course, notoriously censored the Hunter Biden laptop story into the 2020 election, in case you didn't remember this.
00:26:56.000They said that they couldn't verify the story, right?
00:26:59.000And what that really meant was, we now know, the FBI told them that this may be Russian disinformation, And Facebook said, oh, okay, we can't verify.
00:27:08.000While the FBI, we know that the FBI knew it was not Russian disinformation, the FBI had verified it and told Facebook, hey, hey, hey, it may be from Russia, so don't verify it.
00:27:20.000And by the way, keep in mind, this episode was throttled as well, where the Hunter Biden laptop was shown to the American public by Rudy Giuliani for the very first time.
00:27:40.000Unfortunately, I can't show them to you right now, but this is the hard drive they're on.
00:27:44.000Now if it seems like I didn't react with enough enthusiasm, it's because I was watching on a small monitor and I had no idea what was taking place at that moment in time.
00:27:53.000I felt like, oh, he's showing me that he downloaded something.
00:27:56.000I didn't know that dressed as a Marty McFly look-alike that he was going to show for the very first time the most controversial Item, effectively, in the United States at that moment in time.
00:28:34.000Now, before the FBI works with Facebook, They suppress you.
00:28:39.000It starts with suppressing you so that the only people who have a voice are those in big tech and those in big government, namely intelligence agencies and the DOJ, and they can work together.
00:29:37.000Frankly, it's a miracle that any conservative candidate wins, ever, when you're fighting against Alphabet, Google, YouTube, Meta, Facebook, Instagram.
00:29:48.000Now, we were accused, this was considered a conspiracy theory back in the day.
00:29:52.000We've had entire episodes removed for discussing this.
00:29:55.000And of course, this channel, if you're watching on YouTube, has been 100% demonetized.
00:30:00.000Because of discussing these issues, only now Zuckerberg apologized for censoring stories, including the Hunter Biden laptop last week.
00:30:24.000And so here we are today, today, where we're in the exact same scenario.
00:30:30.000Hey, the DOJ, and of course you could argue that by extension, knowing what we know, the intelligence agencies, there could be some corruption.
00:31:11.000And I'm not entirely sure what they did with the podcast, but for example, Alex Jones was removed from YouTube, Facebook, Meta, Twitter, Spotify, Apple, in one day.
00:31:21.000And Jen Psaki, working for the White House, called on Spotify to censor content.
00:31:26.000That's a conference call with only a handful of people.
00:31:29.000You don't think that the FBI can be on that call or the DOJ?
00:32:42.000Right now, at this moment in time, it's the biggest topic and the biggest piece of news regarding that topic or relating to that topic right now.
00:32:49.000is what you were trying to share yesterday.
00:32:57.000They're not going to stop, Half-Asian Bill Richmond, that's how we met, because this was happening
00:33:00.000with me on Facebook, I believe back in 2016, 2020, somewhere around there.
00:33:06.000I mean, it is the same consistent story.
00:33:09.000It was Zuckerberg back then with the contractors who had you on a blacklist, along with the Chris Kyle Foundation, Breitbart, and we're seeing it, and really it gets back to that larger issue, right, is these platforms and their ability to put their thumb on the scale of information.
00:33:27.000You know, shocking that we're seeing these statements coming out now, but I think that's the reality is folks have We have smelled a bad smell for a long time and been told, don't worry, don't worry, don't worry, and we realize someone shit the bed on truth and being able to allow the American people to judge for themselves.
00:33:46.000Let's just compare how Trump's kids were handled versus how Hunter was handled, right?
00:33:52.000Any little rumor was blasted across like it was true about Ivanka.
00:34:20.000Put all of that in the context of crimes that say this is what the family is about, and now they're just like, Yeah, let's just sweep that under the rug with the other dandruff.
00:34:30.000If you were exclusively a New York Times reader, you'd be very confused right now, because you'd be hearing that Hunter Biden has pled guilty to tax evasion.
00:34:56.000Effectively, the big tech oligarchs are the resources, and unfortunately these intelligence agencies, the federal government, is the muscle.
00:35:04.000These big tech oligarchs have the money, they have the ability to throttle information, but the intimidation comes from the FBI, from the CIA, from the DOJ, as Mark Zuckerberg just told you, because they can enforce consequences.
00:35:22.000We appreciate your support, but let me just make the case really quickly here if you are not a member of Mug Club, because what you've seen We'll cease to be.
00:36:45.000If you haven't clicked that button right now, if we haven't convinced you, and hey, if you're on the fence, let us make our case between now and election.
00:36:52.000We are leaving nothing for the swim back.
00:37:42.000And for laughs, you know, media matters.
00:37:44.000Just because no one cares, but it's funny, they have someone dedicated full-time who's a Mug Club member.
00:37:49.000So, you can use the promo code right now, Lawfare, you get $20 off.
00:37:54.000You can click that link if you're watching on Rumble, or go to ladderwithcredit.com slash MugClub, because all of this is because of you, and we really try and earn it every day.
00:38:05.000I tell everyone here, look, when you do a show, when you create a new piece, assume that that person has never seen you before.
00:38:11.000You have to earn not only the trust, But you have to earn their right to tune in and watch because there's so much out there these days.
00:38:19.000And I know that you have tip jar fatigue.
00:38:21.000And that's why, not only on election night...
00:38:24.000We're on election night, we are gearing up for the election livestream of the century, November 2024.
00:38:29.000We are going to have investigative journalists, some of the people who've done some of these pieces, in major cities, in every major swing state across the country.
00:38:37.000We are actually going to, this time, have the ability to look at real-time data and help call states and dispute states that are being called, and you will have the live electoral integrity map where, if something is happening, some shenanigans, You go to the electoral integrity map, there'll be a box, you click it, opens up, and you can see the reporting in real time so that then you can go out and amplify it so the media doesn't just memory hole pelican cases of ballots in the middle of the night in Atlanta when they claimed that a pipe burst.
00:39:04.000So they can't just memory hole Bristol boards going up over voting precincts in Detroit or at 2 or 3 a.m.
00:39:14.000If there are enough of you in real time who get it out on election night, that's what this is for, the resources that have never been available online, they can't erase it all.
00:43:16.000She's on X. Now look, I understand and I'm defending, even if I disagree with somebody, I can still say that's not how this is supposed to work.
00:43:23.000No, I don't think Blaise should have fired her over allegations, and I don't think, certainly Big Tech shouldn't remove her personal profiles.
00:43:28.000And that doesn't defend actions, because I don't know what those are yet, but that's the kind of country we have.
00:43:31.000We wait until those things are proven.
00:43:58.000It doesn't mean that there was one unified message that was Russian propaganda, because if you look at some of the people who were creating content, they didn't even share the same opinions.
00:44:08.000If someone at the top was lying to them about the funding, that is a separate issue.
00:44:11.000So hopefully that frames it in a way that's, you know, objective.
00:44:14.000But yeah, they shouldn't be firing someone based on allegations.
00:44:17.000No, and I mean, that's like when the UK... It's like, you don't fire Stelter because he's gay.
00:45:27.000If you have to serve a master, of course your first and only master should be God, but if you have to serve somebody, more so than even shareholders, but certainly investors, donors who have their own opinions, or people who can then guide the content, I would much rather be beholden to you.
00:46:57.000Oh, shut up, X. Now, the reason this is...
00:47:02.000Funny to me is because, you know, I did at one point work just as a contributor to Fox News when I was young, before Mug Club.
00:47:10.000I was just a comedian and would contribute to Fox News.
00:47:12.000I've worked at other companies, of course, and if you ever perform at comedy clubs, right, you're effectively, sometimes you have to cater to them.
00:47:20.000It's just it's it's one of those instances where I used to have to do radio shows a lot and if I would appear on cable used to be a kind of a cat-and-mouse game of the FCC right you can say this you can't say that and you'd have people get a little upset you know back in the day Opie and Anthony and Howard Stern it was kind of this this sort of friendly rivalry But the censorship was coming from the FCC, and at least you knew where it was coming from.
00:47:43.000And we thought, hey, once we got it, they went to satellite radio.
00:47:45.000The internet, hey, the censors are gone.
00:47:48.000Only now it's so much worse, and censorship has been crowdsourced.
00:47:53.000Where now you have comedians, who work entirely blue, editing out the word butt on their Instagram Reels.
00:48:03.000And not to mention, of course, political points of view.
00:48:05.000And so that's the problem with crowdsourcing censorship.
00:48:07.000You have people who can now go, I don't like this point of view, community guideline or some kind of a community note.
00:48:14.000Sorry, community guideline is YouTube.
00:48:15.000We're going to post a community note, which could result, depending on the platform, in throttling.
00:48:20.000At least you had some kind of reasonable expectation of the censors.
00:48:24.000That's What's so perverse about quote-unquote cancel culture is now you have a bunch of people who've been given the power of the FCC and they're not just saying you can't say something scatological, they're saying you can't say something that we disagree with.
00:48:39.000So we talked about Big Tech themselves, Meta, Facebook, actively censoring content, but even on X, this video from Gerald pointing out the censorship was then met with community notes.
00:48:51.000I just think it's funny, but here was the video.
00:49:45.000A private company determining what information they want their consumers to see or advertisers to support is not impeding someone's ability to vote, which is election interference.
00:49:55.000No citizen is obligated to pass forward anything they are handed as per the First Amendment."
00:50:01.000So you know that a liberal proposed this because it's bullshit.
00:50:41.000You know, I used to be a libertarian, too, back when I really cared about weed, even though I didn't use it.
00:50:47.000Then I realized, hold on a second, we are already at the point of censorship.
00:50:52.000We are already at the point of the First Amendment being violated, because especially now we know that big tech acts as an arm, a strong arm of government. Let me be really
00:51:02.000clear about this too. Per section 230, platforms like Facebook, okay, they're allowed to moderate
00:51:07.000content. And this is Bill's, half-Asian Bill Richmond's wheelhouse, but based on very
00:51:12.000specific parameters as to not be a violation of the First Amendment.
00:51:19.000Any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, it does not include outright censoring political viewpoints, and certainly not Gerald's commentary therein pointing out seeming collusion between meta and The government or the DOJ.
00:53:07.000No, but I will say I did get a call when Gerald did that video and Facebook, the lawyers, asked me if I thought that Gerald was lewd and I did agree.
00:54:30.000But, Bill, people talk about this quite a bit, like Section 230, like, well, it's not a violation of the First Amendment for a private company, and they used to say that quite a bit.
00:54:37.000I think a lot of people have had their eyes opened, but certainly after the last month where Diageo went to Rumble and said, even if it's off of YouTube now, we're going to guarantee that you can't make money unless you remove these voices.
00:54:53.000Is it just a private company issue when they're talking about something like this, the First Amendment?
00:54:58.000So there's two different aspects of it.
00:55:00.000One, you've got Section 230 and its limited scope, but how it's been broadened over and over and over again by the courts, particularly California's Ninth Circuit that covers the West Coast on the federal side.
00:55:10.000But the bigger issue here is that as a matter of just simple law, it's a fraudulent issue.
00:55:18.000The question of are you being able to gather all of these people, say that your platform
00:55:22.000is open, that you're enforcing these rules in the right way, when really you're not.
00:55:26.000You've got these shadow algorithms, you've got the shadow banning that's occurring, you're
00:55:29.000putting your thumb on the scale as Mark Zuckerberg has said at the request of the government.
00:55:34.000When the government is making those kinds of requests, that is directly implicating a First Amendment issue, even if you have private fraud that's occurring when companies say, yeah, bring all your opinions, bring your tired, your poor, your opinions, and we'll all discuss them, and they're like, but not these ones!
00:57:01.000We bake plenty of cakes for people who are gay, lesbian, but we don't want to bake a cake for a gay wedding because that violates our religious conscience.
00:57:10.000Here's a list of other bakeries that could serve you.
00:57:42.000By the way, we do have a picture of Chris Pavlosky when everybody comes to him, you know, the advertising 90% and, you know, the governments around the world, the UK, France, and Brazil.
00:57:50.000This is why he can stand up to those people pretty well.
00:59:16.000Somebody clip that and get it to Chris.
00:59:18.000So Zuckerberg did admit, by the way, that the White House and FBI officials, just to be clear, I want to reiterate this, when people say First Amendment, private company, Zuckerberg admitted the White House, FBI officials reached out and specifically requested Facebook censor content relating to COVID, relating to the Hunter Biden laptop.
00:59:35.000But that's not the only time it's happened.
00:59:37.000Other examples, of course, you have the Twitter files, that has taken place and Elon shined a light on that.
00:59:42.000Joe Rogan on Spotify, when you had Jen Psaki asking for them to moderate content.
00:59:48.000You had the great Barrington Declaration, right?
00:59:49.000This was censored during, you're talking about during COVID and doctors who came out.
00:59:52.000The Vox Adpocalypse, where since we didn't violate any community guidelines, Google, YouTube, the alphabet,
01:00:04.000Sometimes we're too close to it to realize that a lot of people think they're two separate entities.
01:00:08.000They decided if you don't violate the guidelines, we won't remove you, we'll demonetize you, and as a byproduct, of course, your channel will be completely throttled.
01:00:16.000This has been going on for a very long period of time, and we know that the government is working directly with them.
01:00:22.000But don't take my word for it, First Amendment.
01:00:26.000Our hope is that all major tech platforms and all major news sources, for that matter, be responsible and be vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as COVID-19.
01:00:41.000Because when you talk about the Barrington, the Great Barrington Declaration, what they say in there and then what is implied are two different
01:00:49.000things. Let everybody get infected that's going to be able to be getting infected and then we'll
01:00:55.000have herd immunity. Quite frankly, that is nonsense.
01:00:58.000Enter the Twitter files. Over the past few weeks, journalists picked by Elon Musk have
01:01:02.000been given access to some of Twitter's internal systems and communications. Matt Taibbi is
01:01:08.000They have a whole universe of stuff that they can do to any single account.
01:01:14.000They can dial it all the way down to you cannot be searched.
01:01:18.000All the way up to your account will not trend.
01:01:20.000Nina, do you think the disinformation board was the victim of, in fact, misinformation given the backlash it saw?
01:01:28.000Actually, Jamie, I would say that the Disinformation Governance Board was the victim of disinformation.
01:01:33.000So we have a higher standard for monetization, so then we did announce the monetization change that Steven Crowder was his monetization strategy.
01:01:39.000So was that in reaction to people reacting to you not reacting, or was that something you were already planning to do and just hadn't got around to announcing?
01:01:46.000No, we were in the process of looking at that.
01:01:49.000YouTube dragged its feet before taking any action against conservative commentator Stephen Crowder, despite being informed of Crowder's two-year homophobic harassment campaign against journalist Carla Maza.
01:02:37.000And by the way, if you're not paying attention yet, please, I hope that you are, and if you are not convinced as to where your dollar goes, you're with Mug Club.
01:02:46.000If these pieces that you've seen are not enough, stay tuned.
01:02:58.000And actually, in good news, before we're going to take Mug Club chat in a little bit, I know we have a lot of new members, and we don't have an update from Merchant yet, or Donald Trump's press conference.
01:03:12.000So press conference from Donald Trump is still set for 12 Eastern.
01:03:15.000Well, it's a good time because pressure's on, and it seems like the tides are changing or turning quite a bit.
01:03:21.000Nate Silver, who now the left hates, even though they loved him for a long time, he now changed, I believe last night, the chances at winning the election.