Ilhan Omar is facing calls to be deported because newly unearthed documents reveal that she in fact married her biological brother. Yes, she did. She did more than just have sex with her husband's brother. She had sex with him.
00:00:16.000You may have heard recently as breaking news that Ilhan Omar is facing calls to be deported because newly unearthed documents reveal that she in fact married The thing here is we've known this for years, we've taken it a step further and we make no apologies for it so let's go back to the vault
00:00:38.000Your lipstick is color Don't bother you a lot I know exactly what goes on Ilan Omar married her Owned biological brother
00:01:08.000I wish this was a joke But I'm completely serious, yeah Some people did something I will just say I have no interest in commenting about my personal life.
00:01:22.000And will you tell all your friends Omar married her sibling?
00:01:28.000This song was super necessary, this song was super necessary.
00:01:33.000And will you tell all your friends Ilan married her sibling?
00:01:38.000This song was super necessary, this song was super necessary.
00:04:14.000Click the Rumble Premium button to join now for $99 annually, or try it for $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad-free experience and exclusive daily content from this show, Nick DiPaolo, Mr. Guns N' Gear, Tim Pool, Russell Brand, Donald Trump Jr., Dr. Disrespect, and an ever-expanding roster of content creators and all the free speech you can eat, eat if you could eat it.
00:06:44.000We have a window in time to do it, and I'm okay with it.
00:06:47.000Stop thumbing your noses at us, you arrogant pricks.
00:06:50.000The left is claiming that Donald Trump is lawless because of his executive orders.
00:06:55.000Hint, anytime the left claims to care about constitutionality, they're lying to you.
00:06:59.000And we're actually going to have President Donald Trump on the program with the circuit judge today who tried to block one of his executive orders, and they've agreed to have a discussion regarding that.
00:10:01.000If you don't fully understand the subtext, you may actually give credence to the left's wailing and gnashing of teeth.
00:10:08.000So, AP reporters, Associated Press that used to be considered the gold standard, they've been blocked from covering these White House events in the Oval Office.
00:12:01.000And there are hundreds of outlets on this campus.
00:12:03.000Many of you in this room who don't have the privilege of being part of that pool every single day and getting to ask the president questions We reserve the right to decide who gets to go into the Oval Office And you all have credentials to be here including the Associated Press who is in this briefing room today Now This is important because for example when we started Mug Club, which is now Rumble Premium We had a lot of people approaching us saying hey Hey free is the enemy of premium and they wanted us to take away all of our free content
00:12:33.000The reason I... Use this example because it was very important to us that you never remove content that has been available to the public, but you can add more.
00:13:10.000She went on to make it really clear as to why they're not allowed in the Oval Office.
00:13:16.000I was very upfront in my briefing on day one that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable.
00:13:25.000And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf of America.
00:13:31.000And I'm not sure why news outlets don't want to call it that, but that is what it is.
00:13:36.000The Secretary of Interior has made that the official designation in the Geographical Identification Name Server, and Apple has recognized that.
00:13:46.000Pretty much every other outlet in this room has recognized that body of water as the Gulf of America, and it's very important to this administration that we get that right, not just for people here at home, but also for the rest of the world.
00:13:57.000Let's just all agree to call it Hurricane Harbor at this point.
00:15:14.000All kinds of great shirts that you can go out and wear and have a positive message for people.
00:15:18.000And hey, maybe they'll ask you some questions and you can tell them about God or tell them about this show if you don't know anything about God, but just wear the shirt.
00:15:23.000I've got a self-proclaimed Christian on my shirt, but, you know, the Ten Commandments says thou shalt not steal.
00:16:16.000And this is where we, we're going to go through this here, kind of three key facts that I think you need to, this is really the only option left right now.
00:16:47.000And I think what's most important here, and Donald Trump, President Trump, and Hegseth, they are taking this opportunity to tell Europe to unscrew themselves.
00:17:01.000Let the United States focus on the United States and Europe, NATO. You want to play these games, start paying your fair share, and hey, maybe you won't be able to brag about those entitlement programs so much when you have to defend your own borders.
00:17:15.000It's time for insane in the Ukraine I'm sad we won't be able to use that stinger so much anymore It's really him.
00:18:54.000So the conversation, of course, inspired meltdowns.
00:18:58.000And I know that there's no good team here, but the Europeans, the Democrats, the neocons who really, really wanted this war to continue.
00:19:05.000And talking to people in the defence establishment, what I'm hearing are things like this.
00:19:11.000They, the US administration, are doing this above Zelensky's head.
00:19:17.000Well, that's not that hard to do, right?
00:19:19.000And on the overall approach, which is that no way will Vladimir Putin get all he wants, which is Ukraine, but Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky will lose a huge amount of Ukraine.
00:19:30.000This is what I'm hearing of the US administration.
00:19:37.000So it means that not only is unprovoked aggression by Russia against Ukraine now OK, every other former Republican, the Soviet Union, is vulnerable to the same thing without any indication that the US will do anything about it.
00:19:53.000And I think the people who are paying...
00:19:55.000The closest attention to this outside in Ukraine are in Beijing, where they see the United States unwilling to act against unprovoked aggression in the center of Europe.
00:20:06.000What are they thinking now about Taiwan?
00:20:08.000I'll tell you what, it's the exact opposite of that, you, Rube.
00:20:11.000This is specifically so that we can be prepared for a conflict that does involve American self-interest, Taiwan.
00:20:18.000And Secretary of Defense Hegseth made that very, very clear.
00:22:36.000If it were to happen, hey, that's NATO's job.
00:22:38.000And without the United States, guess what?
00:22:41.000There is no offense mounted by Ukraine.
00:22:44.000And we're tired of the rest of the world demanding money while you tell us that you have free health care and free internet and whatever it is that you gays in Europe do.
00:22:53.000Let me tell you why this plan makes perfect sense at this moment in time.
00:22:57.000Number one, President Trump started from a position of strength.
00:23:01.000Right after his inauguration, he wrote this on truth.
00:23:04.000I'm going to do Russia, whose economy is failing, and President Putin a very big favor.
00:23:11.000Settle now and stop this ridiculous war.
00:23:13.000It's only going to get worse if we don't make a deal, and soon I have no other choice but to put high levels of taxes, tariffs, and sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States and various other participating countries.
00:26:51.000We are living in reality at this point, and we have another problem that I think has been highlighted by this war, and I would argue, as Americans, should concern us most, but that's me, Mr. Selfish American, is that we have now seen that Europe is woefully inequipped.
00:27:37.000It is a given that the United States will be the never-ending supply of funding so long as we are virtue-signaled, brow-beaten into submission on behalf of interests that are not aligned with our own.
00:27:53.000I think the most important point that can be made at this point, you can comment below if you disagree, is to tell Europe, hey, hey, Start removing the entitlement phallus from your asses and start taking care of your own countries.
00:29:01.000And we challenge your countries and your citizens to double down and recommit yourselves not only to Ukraine's immediate security needs but to Europe's long-term defense and deterrence goals.
00:29:19.000Vice President J.D. Vance said pretty much the same thing during the campaign.
00:29:24.000The second biggest criticism I make about the war in Ukraine And our approach to it is that we are subsidizing the Europeans to do nothing.
00:29:32.000The Europeans are not carrying their fair share of the burden, especially when it comes in provision of weapons, and they're de-industrializing their own country at the same time that they say that Putin must be defeated at all costs.
00:29:46.000Side note, isn't it cool to see men again?
00:30:32.000But what gets me viscerally angry is being raised in Canada where they would badmouth the United States, say, ah, you guys are just a bunch of gun-toting yahoos.
00:30:41.000And in Europe, if you have an American passport, oh, you Americans are so blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:30:48.000Second, you get all this free shit, even though you live in small IKEA apartments, they have to have a combo washer-dryer unit that always leaves your clothes damp.
00:33:15.000And for all of the arrogance that you hear, and when you also hear this from American Democrats saying we should be more like Europe, you know, these leisure societies who have...
00:33:25.000Given the world nothing for the last several centuries, you go, well, hold on a second, they're not spending anything on military compared to us.
00:33:31.000They're not spending anything on R&D, and that includes technology, that includes pharmaceuticals, you know, life-saving tools that are created.
00:33:38.000Well, then you look at the entitlements as a percentage of the GDP. France, 32%.
00:36:32.000He was saying, what kind of a message is this sending to...
00:36:37.000You can go back in time when this war started, where we talked about...
00:36:42.000The unholy alliance that could take place between Russia and China, because they weren't good bedfellows, and if they do cozy up, that could be bad.
00:36:48.000And we talked about how we needed to be ready for the Pacific theater, not because we value Taiwan more than the United States, but because we actually have our own self-interest at stake.
00:36:59.000And if you understand the worldview, the ism from this government, of course you would know that Bolton is full of crap, because Secretary Hegseth said on Sunday, I believe it was, I don't know when he said it.
00:37:12.000He was a Sunday morning host, but I think he said it this week.
00:37:23.000The United States faces consequential threats to our homeland.
00:37:27.000We must, and we are, focusing on security of our own borders.
00:37:32.000We also face a peer competitor in the communist Chinese with the capability and intent to threaten our homeland.
00:37:39.000And core national interests in the Indo-Pacific.
00:37:42.000The U.S. is prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific, recognizing the reality of scarcity, and making the resourcing trade-offs to ensure deterrence does not fail.
00:37:58.000There it is again, treating the government like a business!
00:38:04.000Not a never-ending supply of funding, unlike how NATO considers it, how they view it, unlike how the Democrats view it.
00:38:12.000It's just more money, more money, more money, more money equals good.
00:38:15.000So when people like Bolton, those absolute retards, when they say, yeah, this is actually sending a message to Taiwan that we're not going to help them, you don't live in the real world in understanding supply, understanding demand, understanding scarcity.
00:38:31.000The United States defense industry, our industrial base here, cannot support war in both theaters in Ukraine.
00:38:56.000These are all the kinds of supplies that Taiwan would need and instead are being sent to a different theater of war where the control lines haven't changed at all.
00:39:59.000So anyone telling you that this is simply enabling a tyrant and that this is buddying up with Russia, this is really what it comes down to.
00:41:22.000If that really is the red line that you say it is now, why weren't you sending troops in 2014 to make sure that he couldn't keep Crimea going?
00:41:31.000And you would push him out completely and put troops all along the border.
00:41:35.000No, you wanted the United States to act.
00:41:38.000You wanted the United States to fund it and to send our troops because you guys are a bunch of pansies.
00:42:36.000The answer's still probably no, but give it your best shot.
00:42:39.000They're acting like a teenage girl gets drunk at a house party, calls her dad to save her, and then he gets there, puts his arm around her, she goes, no, don't.
00:43:26.000And before we're talking about what we've done at the ministerial, I want to reaffirm a few things from this podium.
00:43:31.000First, as we see it, NATO's strategic objectives are to prevent great power conflict in Europe, deter nuclear and non-nuclear aggression, and defeat threats.
00:43:46.000To treaty allies should deterrence fail.
00:43:51.000Second, the US is committed to building a stronger, more lethal NATO. However, we must ensure that European and Canadian commitment to Article 3 of this treaty is just as strong.
00:44:05.000Article 3 says that allies, and I quote, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, We'll maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.
00:44:23.000Leaders of our European allies should take primary responsibility for defense of the continent, which means security ownership by all allies, guided by a clear understanding of strategic realities, and it's an imperative given the strategic realities that we face.
00:44:42.000And that begins with increasing defense spending.
00:44:48.0002% is a start, as President Trump has said, but it's not enough.
00:47:30.000There's a different class of general when you look at people like MacArthur or Patton and you look at some of the generals there at the Pentagon who haven't seen combat this century.
00:47:38.000This is a guy, whether you're a general or not...
00:47:40.000Today, a guy like him has actually gone into combat, armed this century, and has also been in a position of authority.
00:47:46.000Someone who's been in a position of authority but only pushed a pen for the last 20, 30, 40, 50 years may find themselves a little bit out of touch.
00:50:09.000So when you look at what he may have to give or take, what's in or what's out in those negotiations, we have the perfect dealmaker at the table from a position of strength to deal with both Vladimir Putin and Zelensky.
00:50:23.000No one's going to get everything that they want.
00:50:26.000Understanding who committed the aggression in the first place.
00:50:29.000But I challenge anyone else to think of a world leader at this moment who, with credibility and strength, could bring those two leaders to the table and forge a durable peace that ultimately serves the interests of Ukraine, stops the killing and the death, which President Trump has been clear he wants to do, and hopefully ultimately is guaranteed by strength of Europeans who are there prepared to back it up.
00:51:02.000Why not invoke Article 5, then, for the NATO peacekeeping forces that could potentially be deployed?
00:51:08.000Like, how does that deter President Putin?
00:51:10.000Well, I would say, I want to be clear about something as it pertains to NATO membership not being a realistic outcome for negotiations.
00:51:18.000That's something that was stated as part of my remarks here, as part of a coordination with how we're executing...
00:51:25.000These ongoing negotiations, which are a laying realistic outcome for negotiations.
00:51:29.000That's something that was stated as part of my remarks here, as part of a coordination with how we're executing these ongoing negotiations, which are led by President Trump.
00:51:39.000All of that said, these negotiations are led by President Trump.
00:51:44.000Everything is on the table in his conversations with Vladimir Putin and Zelensky.
00:51:50.000What he decides to allow or not allow is at the purview of the leader of the free world, of President Trump.
00:51:56.000So I'm not going to stand at this podium and declare what President Trump will do or won't do.
00:52:04.000What concessions will be made or what concessions are not made.
00:52:07.000I can look as our team has what's realistic, likely on an outcome.
00:52:13.000I think realism is an important part of the conversation that hasn't existed enough inside conversations amongst friends.
00:52:20.000But simply pointing out realism, like the borders won't be rolled back to what everybody would like them to be in 2014, is not a concession to Vladimir Putin.
00:52:29.000It's a recognition of the hard power realities on the ground, after a lot of investment and sacrifice, first by the Ukrainians and then by allies.
00:52:38.000And then a realization that a negotiated peace is going to be some sort of demarcation that neither side wants.
00:52:46.000But it's not my job as the Secretary of Defense to define the parameters of the President of the United States as he leads some of the most complex and consequential negotiations.
00:52:56.000Is that deploying troops, NATO troops?
00:52:59.000We were switching the feed at that point, so I don't remember.
00:53:06.000Look how they put Zelensky next to this guy.
00:53:08.000Given the position you've now staked out, what leverage exactly is Ukraine being left with, especially if the U.S. also plans to wind down its military aid?
00:53:17.000And then quickly, if a NATO ally is attacked by Russia or any country, will the U.S. unequivocally uphold its obligations under Article 5, regardless of that country's...
00:53:26.000How about the rest of NATO?...to the alliance, and that's part of the alliance, right?
00:53:29.000You point out Article 5, you point out Article 3. It's just a cheap...
00:53:34.000I'm not saying it's cheap coming from you.
00:53:37.000But it's just a cheap political point to say, oh, we've left all the negotiating cards off the table by recognizing some realities that exist on the ground.
00:53:48.000President Zelensky understands the realities on the ground.
00:53:51.000President Putin understands the realities on the ground.
00:53:54.000And President Trump, as a dealmaker, as a negotiator, understands those dynamics as well.
00:53:59.000By no means is anything that I state here, even though we lead the most powerful military in the world, hemming in the commander-in-chief in his negotiations to ultimately decide where it goes or does not go.
00:55:01.000And then we're really glad that it's Trump.
00:55:03.000That man has no consistency of principle ever.
00:55:07.000At least you know that Putin is totalitarian.
00:55:11.000We might have even though we have them.
00:55:14.000There is something to relationships and deals in real ways whether militarily or economically or diplomatically that he sees that are possibilities that could forge together a lot of opportunities to show that solidarity that Vladimir Putin will clearly recognize.
00:55:32.000Look at the difference in NATO Secretary General Mark Rood.
00:55:34.000Any peace deal must be enduring and talks must involve Ukraine closely.
00:55:37.000That kind of language versus what Hegseth is saying.
00:55:42.000Hegseth is saying very clearly, here's the situation on the ground.
00:55:46.000What we have to do is realize that that is not going away.
00:56:30.000You want to send that guy out there, not the pansies who we had working in the last administration.
00:56:36.000And the same goes for quite fetching press secretaries.
00:56:39.000Well, to the first part of your question, that's not ultimately my decision.
00:56:43.000The President will lead these negotiations alongside our Secretary of State, our National Security Advisor, and numerous other officials that will be involved.
00:56:52.000And ultimately, we've played our role in talking to our NATO allies about what that would look like.
00:56:58.000President Trump, I want to point out, I've got the truths right here that he posted, called both, in case we missed it, Vladimir Putin and President Zelensky.
00:57:11.000Any negotiation that's had will be had with both.
00:57:15.000I also am very encouraged by what the Secretary General has said here.
00:57:20.000Clearly attuned to the realities of the moment, the need for peace, and that the NATO Alliance and European members will play a role in that.
00:58:03.000Am I being too simplistic to think that, you know, it's been two years of this war, you've tried your best to be, I don't know, whatever kind of arbitrator you think you are?
00:59:39.000I think nobody can or should contest the extent of America's willingness to invest in national security.
00:59:47.000We have a budget of $850 billion spent on defense.
00:59:53.000I'm in the business of ensuring that every dollar of that is used wisely, which is why we're pushing a Pentagon audit and making sure that we're cut in fat so that we've got more at the tip of the spear.
01:00:06.0003.4% is a very robust investment, larger than most of our allies within NATO. Any defense minister or secretary of defense that tells you they wouldn't want more would be lying to you.
01:00:49.000Very much committed to the NATO alliance and to our allies.
01:00:52.000But without burden-sharing, without creating the right set of incentives for European countries to invest, then we would be forced to attempt to be everywhere for everybody all the time, which in a world of fiscal restraints is, again, to get back to that word reality, just not reality.
01:01:11.000So, yes, we will continue to spend robustly our expectation of our friends, and we say this Let me ask you really quickly,
01:02:01.000This guy just gave you some historical context, just gave you current international context, and stuck the landing and said, the reality is you have to spend more on your...
01:02:29.000Want to bet they're going to start spending more?
01:02:31.000Shins of the communist Chinese are a threat to free people everywhere.
01:02:36.000To include America's interests in the Pacific.
01:02:39.000And it makes a lot of sense, just in a common sense way, to use our comparative advantages.
01:02:48.000European countries spending here, in defense of this continent, in defense of allies here, against an aggressor on this continent with ambitions.
01:02:59.000That strikes me as the right place to...
01:03:02.000And I don't say that in a condescending way.
01:03:03.000I say that in a common sense, practical way.
01:03:06.000Investing in defense on the continent makes sense.
01:03:11.000It also makes sense comparatively and geographically for the United States, along with allies in the Pacific, like Japan and South Korea and the Philippines and Australia and others, to also invest in allies and partners and capabilities in the Pacific.
01:03:26.000To project power there in service of deterrence.
01:03:29.000I don't see any German ships in the Pacific.
01:03:31.000That deterrent effect in the Pacific is one that really can only be led by the United States.
01:03:35.000We wish we could lead everywhere at all times.
01:03:38.000We will stand in solidarity with allies and partners and encourage everyone to invest in order to have forced multiplication of what we represent, but it requires realistic conversations.
01:03:51.000Those with disingenuous motives in the media I don't mean to look at you.
01:03:56.000I'm just saying anyone that suggests it's abandonment are trying to drive a wedge between allies that does not exist.
01:04:26.000And that's why when I say make NATO great again, it's what President Trump set out to do in 2017. The press said President Trump is abandoning NATO. He's turning his back on our NATO allies.
01:04:41.000That's what the headlines read in 2017 and 2018. What actually happened?
01:04:47.000That tough conversation created even more investment.
01:04:52.000To the point where now almost every NATO country is meeting the 2% goal that was said to be egregious when he first said it.