Louder with Crowder - Trump's Back: Supreme Court Triggers Leftist Media Meltdown!

00:00:00.000 🎵 Music 🎵 🎵 Music 🎵

00:00:33.000 🎵 Phone Ringing 🎵 Human Resources, how can I help you?

00:00:48.000 Oh, yes, thank you for picking up the phone.

00:00:51.000 I'm calling because I'm an HR coordinator and I'm having issues with, rather embarrassingly, with HR at my workplace.

00:01:00.000 Oh, goodness.

00:01:01.000 Yes, that's why I'm here to help.

00:01:03.000 Did someone use a derogatory term when they saw your new haircut?

00:01:06.000 No, no they didn't.

00:01:08.000 Is this about when someone blew out your Hanukkah candles?

00:01:11.000 No, Hanukkah was months ago and it's a menorah.

00:01:15.000 What if they go out? 0.99

00:01:15.000 Doesn't God kill your firstborn? 0.99

00:01:17.000 No. 0.98

00:01:18.000 Not at all.

00:01:18.000 Is it the fact that so many people dislike Jews?

00:01:18.000 No.

00:01:21.000 Is it the fact that so many people dislike you?

00:01:21.000 No.

00:01:24.000 Well, I mean... I think my coworkers like me.

00:01:26.000 Well, maybe that's too liberal.

00:01:29.000 They tolerate me.

00:01:30.000 But my issue isn't with my coworkers.

00:01:31.000 It's really with my boss.

00:01:35.000 Oh yeah, the boss man.

00:01:36.000 Is that, uh, you want to file a report about his generosity?

00:01:40.000 Well... His giving heart?

00:01:42.000 I wouldn't put it that way.

00:01:43.000 Steven actually subjects me to constant teasing, ridicule, humiliation, and just I feel he has a complete lack of respect for not only me, but the entire HR community.

00:02:00.000 You, Sam!

00:02:01.000 Nobody likes you, Sam!

00:02:03.000 You were adopted!

00:02:05.000 I think you were adopted, right?

00:02:07.000 You were adopted because no one could love you!

00:02:10.000 You were a glorified tax credit on a ledger!

00:02:14.000 And Uncle Sam doesn't even know!

00:02:16.000 You can't serve your country!

00:02:17.000 What?

00:02:20.000 He killed Jesus!

00:02:21.000 You killed Christ, Sam! 0.98

00:02:24.000 Sam, that's the kind of sin that doesn't wash off!

00:02:27.000 Steven?

00:02:28.000 That was you? 0.98

00:02:30.000 That's right, little prick. 0.98

00:02:31.000 Because no one wants to call you. 0.98

00:02:33.000 I'm the only person who'd ever call you.

00:02:34.000 And it's a fake out. 0.99

00:02:36.000 Because you're a bad person, Sam.

00:02:38.000 What? 1.00

00:02:38.000 And a crybaby. 1.00

00:02:39.000 No one, and I mean no one, loves a crybaby.

00:02:44.000 Join Mug Club today for $89 annually or try it Mugless for $9 a month.

00:02:57.000 You can sign up at ladderwithcredit.com slash Mug Club for the entire catalog including Nick DiPaolo, Brian Callen, the Hodgetwins, Mr. Guns and Gear, and of course Alex Jones along with 100% more of this show.

00:03:08.000 Welcome, my fellow mug clubbers.

00:03:11.000 I'm reading right now Nietzsche, thus spake Zarathustra, which I had read in college, of course.

00:03:16.000 Because I, you know, somebody told me all warriors read that.

00:03:19.000 And I was studying Taekwondo, and I decided that if I was going to be a warrior... You're making so much noise!

00:03:24.000 It's the chair.

00:03:26.000 We gotta oil that chair up. 0.97

00:03:27.000 I'll oil it.

00:03:28.000 I have to oil that chair up.

00:03:29.000 Okay.

00:03:29.000 I'm in the middle of an incredible dissertation, and I just keep hearing... Off-limits.

00:03:41.000 I'm gonna miss a beat.

00:04:07.000 Mmm. Wonderful.

00:04:15.000 Hey, by the way, right now in Mug Club chat, someone just commented that they like Sam.

00:04:21.000 Let's revoke Sam from HR's Mug Club account.

00:04:25.000 He logged in.

00:04:26.000 It had to have been him.

00:04:27.000 Yeah, it was definitely him.

00:04:29.000 Maybe his wife?

00:04:29.000 I don't like the shenanigans.

00:04:30.000 I think so.

00:04:31.000 I doubt it was his wife.

00:04:33.000 She doesn't like Sam.

00:04:34.000 That's true.

00:04:35.000 We've never met her.

00:04:36.000 Now!

00:04:39.000 She lives in Canada.

00:04:40.000 Yes, exactly.

00:04:41.000 Not real.

00:04:42.000 Hey, let's just bring up the rundown really quickly.

00:04:45.000 The media has been melting down over the Supreme Court Trump decision.

00:04:48.000 So I know that yesterday we covered it live and we appreciate you watching with us, experiencing it with us.

00:04:52.000 You'll remember where you were when, however, The meltdown that didn't entirely take place while we were on air is too good to not cover.

00:05:00.000 Not to mention the inconsistency.

00:05:01.000 And it's exacerbated by the fact that, you can bring that back up Toolman, that the most recent New York Times poll shows really bad news for former Vice President Joe Biden.

00:05:11.000 Very bad.

00:05:12.000 Even worse than you would think when you look into the kind of the sub-data.

00:05:16.000 The only worse news is that he was dead.

00:05:18.000 Like if he woke up dead, that would be worse news.

00:05:21.000 He should pray for the sweet, merciful release.

00:05:24.000 At this point.

00:05:25.000 And something in a Gerald Knows Stuff segment, Catherine Herridge, this is an investigative journalist who just had her First Amendment rights infringed upon.

00:05:34.000 She was fired.

00:05:35.000 She had her sources revealed.

00:05:36.000 And it's something that obviously is near and dear to our hearts.

00:05:39.000 And we've told you we will gladly go to jail for our sources here at Mug Club Undercover.

00:05:44.000 Mostly you.

00:05:45.000 What?

00:05:47.000 Did I?

00:05:47.000 What?

00:05:48.000 If at some point today while you're watching you see this, On YouTube.

00:05:53.000 Head on over to Rumble or Mug Club.

00:05:54.000 You know, it's a live show.

00:05:55.000 10 a.m.

00:05:55.000 Eastern.

00:05:56.000 Every weekday!

00:05:58.000 You want to know, watch the show.

00:05:59.000 So, I guess what the question is, am I going to jail?

00:06:02.000 You can comment below.

00:06:03.000 Should I?

00:06:03.000 A part of me feels like that would be just... We just walked you into it.

00:06:10.000 Captain Morgan, CEO.

00:06:11.000 How are you, sir?

00:06:12.000 I'm doing well.

00:06:12.000 I don't know any of our sources.

00:06:13.000 It's great.

00:06:14.000 I don't have to go to jail.

00:06:15.000 I know.

00:06:16.000 They haul me into the depot and go, whoa, who's this person?

00:06:18.000 I go, her name's Red Sparrow. 0.62

00:06:20.000 That's not her name.

00:06:21.000 I go, I don't know.

00:06:22.000 I have no idea.

00:06:23.000 I have literally been shielded from them so I can't even accidentally talk a big game and reveal their sources.

00:06:29.000 That's right.

00:06:29.000 Absolutely.

00:06:30.000 I'm doing well, by the way.

00:06:30.000 And I appreciate it.

00:06:31.000 Sorry, I didn't answer your question.

00:06:32.000 You did say you were doing well.

00:06:33.000 Yeah, I'm doing much better than maybe potentially you going to jail.

00:06:35.000 Yeah, who knows?

00:06:36.000 You know what?

00:06:37.000 Hey, my face will be in a mugshot and then I'll gain 20% of the black vote. 0.99

00:06:40.000 There you go! 0.96

00:06:42.000 Think about that.

00:06:42.000 Before we move on to third chair, think about this with Donald Trump.

00:06:44.000 We're going to talk about the black vote today and how there is a startling switch to Donald Trump versus President Joe Biden in comparison, you know, historically.

00:06:55.000 The left thinks that they are going to harm Donald Trump with the black voting base by shouting from the rooftops that he sleeps with models and he has a mug shot. 0.75

00:07:11.000 He's a walking rap video.

00:07:16.000 Who saw this one backfiring?

00:07:17.000 Is he Diddy's manager?

00:07:20.000 I don't think P. Diddy is his name anymore.

00:07:20.000 Is it still?

00:07:21.000 No.

00:07:22.000 Oh, Diddy Dog?

00:07:23.000 Diddy Daddy Love?

00:07:24.000 But in third chair, when you hear this, you know, you must have thanked him for his service.

00:07:24.000 I don't know.

00:07:28.000 He'll be at Bricktown Comedy Club in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Friday, March 22nd.

00:07:33.000 You guys supported his special.

00:07:34.000 We appreciate it.

00:07:35.000 And go out and see his new material.

00:07:36.000 Josh Feierstein, how are you?

00:07:38.000 I'm all right.

00:07:39.000 I'm actually not going to jail.

00:07:40.000 I'm not welcome back.

00:07:41.000 No.

00:07:41.000 No?

00:07:42.000 They told me at county jail, they said, no, no more for you.

00:07:45.000 Have you actually been to county jail?

00:07:47.000 Not here.

00:07:48.000 Pierce County Jail, yeah, in Tacoma, Washington.

00:07:50.000 Oh, what'd you do?

00:07:51.000 I was arrested for DUI.

00:07:52.000 Oh, I'm sorry.

00:07:55.000 Yeah, I didn't do it.

00:07:56.000 You didn't do it?

00:07:57.000 I did do it.

00:07:58.000 Someone else planted it on you?

00:08:00.000 No, I did it.

00:08:01.000 Someone else planted breath on you.

00:08:03.000 I did it.

00:08:05.000 I did it.

00:08:05.000 Meth.

00:08:07.000 But I did it.

00:08:09.000 Also, before we move on here... Shout out Aladdin Bail Bonds. 0.79

00:08:11.000 I forgot to... We are doing a State of the Union live fact check Thursday, March 7th.

00:08:16.000 That's 8 30 p.m.

00:08:17.000 Eastern.

00:08:18.000 A live fact check.

00:08:18.000 The drinking game rules are to follow.

00:08:20.000 So there will not be a morning show that Thursday.

00:08:22.000 And of course we do these big streams and there's usually a I'll be here too.

00:08:24.000 I accidentally made a racist joke just a minute ago.

00:08:26.000 I didn't realize it.

00:08:27.000 You made a joke?

00:08:27.000 lot of fun. Thursday, March 7th. Set the date. Okay. I'll be here too. Well, yeah, but that's

00:08:32.000 assumed. Okay. You have to. I accidentally made a racist joke just a minute ago. I didn't realize

00:08:36.000 it. What joke? Yeah, say it again. You made a joke? Well, you guys said P Diddy and he said

00:08:40.000 Diddy something and I said Diddy Kong and then he holds up a sign that says that's a monkey and I'm

00:08:44.000 like, oh, yeah.

00:08:46.000 I know it is, but I wasn't trying to.

00:08:47.000 Well, I think everybody missed it.

00:08:48.000 No, you thought it would be a nickname.

00:08:49.000 You thought it would be a nickname, but you're Aryan, so it doesn't work. 1.00

00:08:52.000 Just keep digging, Gerald.

00:08:54.000 I wasn't trying to!

00:08:54.000 Yeah, I think everybody missed it, but you're like, no, no, no, you guys.

00:08:57.000 You guys, please cancel.

00:08:59.000 The only way it could be worse would be like, Actually, he looks like Diddy Kong!

00:09:05.000 I don't like the monkeys!

00:09:09.000 Slavery was okay.

00:09:10.000 No!

00:09:11.000 See, he would bring it back, and I at least had to defend myself.

00:09:13.000 I didn't mean to.

00:09:14.000 No, it was total lag.

00:09:15.000 And here's the thing, we're cancel-proof.

00:09:16.000 What are they gonna do?

00:09:17.000 Take us off Rumble? 0.98

00:09:18.000 Go fornicate yourselves. 0.99

00:09:19.000 So! 0.99

00:09:21.000 Here's the thing.

00:09:22.000 This was making the rounds because the left actually thinks that this is a mic drop moment.

00:09:22.000 I watched this.

00:09:28.000 Roland Martin.

00:09:29.000 That's his real name.

00:09:30.000 I had to check Bridges for Trolls.

00:09:32.000 This is the man's name.

00:09:32.000 He's a CNN contributor.

00:09:34.000 And he just right here, I'm going to show you the full clip.

00:09:38.000 It's textbook talking points that they use to try and put pro-life conservatives on the back foot.

00:09:45.000 Don't allow yourself to be caught flat-footed with this.

00:09:48.000 It is lazy, it's something that we have addressed time and time again, but it's the same tired tropes that are trotted out and they think, yeah, like, on a social media algorithm.

00:09:58.000 Watch it and see if you can spot everything wrong.

00:10:02.000 And so what I'm saying is this here.

00:10:03.000 No, no, no, no.

00:10:05.000 What I'm saying is this here.

00:10:06.000 When I listen to Republicans talk about being pro-life, what I want to know is, where are their pro-life stances when it comes to Head Start?

00:10:13.000 Where are their pro-life stances when it comes to prenatal care?

00:10:17.000 Where are their pro-life stances when you have black women who have a high rate of dying in childbirth?

00:10:22.000 Where are your pro-life policies when it comes to black, when it comes to infant mortality?

00:10:27.000 Okay, so one thing, I don't really want to have to go through all the details on why it's factually incorrect, but I will.

00:10:33.000 The macro point here is they try and tell you that you cannot be pro-life if you don't believe in murdering a baby.

00:10:42.000 A baby, a new life that has completely separate DNA from both the mother and the father that determines everything about that child.

00:10:47.000 Height, eye color, male pattern baldness, what their hopes, dreams are, their temperament, all that is determined by their DNA.

00:10:53.000 And it's now separate from the mother and father.

00:10:55.000 You cannot be pro-life unless, and this is what they do, insert every taxpayer funded program wish list here.

00:11:02.000 If you don't support all of those, then you're not pro-life.

00:11:05.000 Then you can just add anything.

00:11:07.000 You can add free phones.

00:11:09.000 You can add free internet.

00:11:10.000 They did it in Germany.

00:11:10.000 It's a human right.

00:11:11.000 It's a lazy argument.

00:11:13.000 And just on that level you can say, well, no.

00:11:15.000 I'm pro-life.

00:11:16.000 I don't believe that you should be able to steal from somebody in order to fund programs that don't work.

00:11:21.000 These are two completely separate conversations.

00:11:23.000 However, he also simply spews a bunch of intellectual fallacies.

00:11:28.000 Let's just go through it.

00:11:29.000 Play and pause.

00:11:30.000 And so what I'm saying is this here.

00:11:32.000 No, no, no, no.

00:11:33.000 What I'm saying is this here.

00:11:34.000 When I listen to Republicans talk about being pro-life, what I want to know is, where are their pro-life stances when it comes to Head Start?

00:11:42.000 Head Start doesn't work.

00:11:42.000 Pause.

00:11:44.000 I know.

00:11:44.000 They're right here.

00:11:44.000 We're talking about public schools.

00:11:45.000 We're talking about publicly funded programs.

00:11:47.000 It doesn't work.

00:11:47.000 It doesn't improve outcomes.

00:11:48.000 And so shoveling more money into a program that is unsuccessful has nothing to do with supporting the life of a child.

00:11:54.000 Let's continue.

00:11:55.000 Where are their pro-life stances when it comes to prenatal care?

00:11:58.000 Pause.

00:11:59.000 Prenatal care.

00:12:00.000 You already have Obamacare, which is what you want.

00:12:00.000 What are you talking about here?

00:12:02.000 You have Medicaid.

00:12:02.000 You have Medicare.

00:12:03.000 You have all kinds of taxpayer-subsidized health care.

00:12:05.000 It just doesn't work all that well.

00:12:07.000 And at what point does personal accountability come into play?

00:12:09.000 Again, we're right back to the idea that if I don't give you my money at gunpoint, I'm somehow not pro-life, assuming the results are what you believe them to be.

00:12:17.000 Let's go on.

00:12:18.000 Where are there pro-life stances where you have black women who have a higher rate of dying in childbirth?

00:12:23.000 Pause.

00:12:24.000 That's due to obesity and improper reproductive care. 0.98

00:12:26.000 And I know that you'll say that's because of a lack of education.

00:12:28.000 They have an iPhone.

00:12:28.000 It's 2024.

00:12:31.000 Android, if they are.

00:12:31.000 Or a smartphone.

00:12:32.000 I don't necessarily know what the black community prefers.

00:12:34.000 This idea that, oh, they have higher... Yeah, well, why is that?

00:12:37.000 Are there higher obesity rates?

00:12:38.000 Are there higher STD rates?

00:12:40.000 Are there higher complications because people don't take care of their own health?

00:12:43.000 Or is it because black women in this country have far less access to healthcare? 1.00

00:12:47.000 No, no, even more. 0.92

00:12:48.000 Taxpayers subsidize healthcare. 0.68

00:12:49.000 Or do black women in this country use it at a disproportional rate, including compared to poor white women? 0.98

00:12:54.000 Let's go.

00:12:55.000 Where are your pro-life policies when it comes to infant mortality?

00:12:59.000 Pause.

00:13:01.000 Well, here's the other thing, too, with infant mortality, and we'll make all the references publicly available.

00:13:01.000 I guess we're done with it.

00:13:04.000 I've talked about this a lot.

00:13:05.000 Infant mortality is not compared with the same standards across different countries.

00:13:09.000 So in the United States, we actually consider it infant mortality because we actually measure that in the data as a life, whereas in other countries, they wouldn't.

00:13:16.000 They would just say, it's a terminated pregnancy.

00:13:17.000 It's equivalent to a miscarriage.

00:13:19.000 they don't actually count it as a life. If you were to use the same standards across

00:13:21.000 different countries, we have a much lower infant mortality rate than certainly anywhere

00:13:25.000 else in the world, and yes, that includes Europe.

00:13:27.000 All right. If you want to join Mug Club, none of this happens without you. $89 annually,

00:13:31.000 $9 to go Mugless if you want to try it. We have the promo code undercover, $10 off.

00:13:38.000 Yeah.

00:13:39.000 I just sit there and I watch it and it shows up in a thing and I'm like, is anyone buying this?

00:13:45.000 Please don't be caught flat.

00:13:46.000 Please don't go, no, no, no.

00:13:48.000 I care about people.

00:13:48.000 Just don't give them the moral high ground.

00:13:50.000 You don't care if you don't add everything up that he's talking about in his wish list.

00:13:55.000 It's hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars, and the outcomes wouldn't be any better.

00:13:58.000 Yes, they're ineffective.

00:13:59.000 And by the way, he's wearing a 1619 pin.

00:14:01.000 I'm not sure if you saw that.

00:14:03.000 That's when the first slaves arrived in the United States.

00:14:03.000 I asked our researchers.

00:14:05.000 And I'm like, I think that's an interesting date.

00:14:08.000 Where did those slaves happen to come from?

00:14:11.000 Maybe you should wear a pin that's like, hey, you guys have been selling your fellow brothers into slavery for hundreds and hundreds of years prior to the Americans at the time bringing people over. 0.97

00:14:20.000 Maybe you should go to the root of the problem.

00:14:22.000 I'm not saying that we had an easy time there.

00:14:24.000 I'm just saying, You're focusing on the wrong enemy.

00:14:26.000 According to Cornel West, it's at least 95% of slaves were actually sold into slavery as opposed to being kidnapped.

00:14:31.000 And by the way, more slaves today than ever in recorded history.

00:14:34.000 Over 40 million slaves on Earth today.

00:14:35.000 We don't talk about that, though!

00:14:37.000 Let's talk about Flintstone vitamins for pregnant broads. 1.00

00:14:41.000 They're chewable.

00:14:41.000 Yes, they are.

00:14:42.000 And tasty.

00:14:43.000 I ate way too many Flintstone vitamins as a kid.

00:14:43.000 They are tasty.

00:14:46.000 You gotta come do that pause thing with me and my wife arguing. 1.00

00:14:53.000 Yeah, because I am not handling it.

00:14:55.000 I'm losing every one of them.

00:14:56.000 Yeah.

00:14:57.000 Yeah, I'm a bad arguer.

00:14:58.000 Well, it doesn't help with women. 1.00

00:14:59.000 She's always like, yeah, but you did this and I'm like, ah, well, I probably did.

00:15:03.000 Yeah.

00:15:03.000 Yes.

00:15:04.000 And I feel bad for it because I love you.

00:15:05.000 All right.

00:15:06.000 Yeah, that's a good, that's a winning argument.

00:15:08.000 We'll talk.

00:15:10.000 And it's Super Tuesday.

00:15:11.000 Go vote.

00:15:12.000 Go vote.

00:15:12.000 Go do that.

00:15:13.000 Go vote, I guess, today.

00:15:14.000 No, it's important.

00:15:15.000 Look, don't think it's a walk-off.

00:15:16.000 No, I know.

00:15:17.000 Go vote.

00:15:17.000 That can hurt people.

00:15:18.000 I thought there would be a sound effect.

00:15:19.000 He won by 70 points in North Dakota.

00:15:22.000 Donald Trump.

00:15:23.000 Yes, that's pretty good.

00:15:24.000 It should have been 75. 0.99

00:15:26.000 Some would argue 80.

00:15:27.000 Some would argue that.

00:15:28.000 I wouldn't, though.

00:15:28.000 Someone.

00:15:29.000 Seven of those ten voters, huh?

00:15:31.000 That's crazy.

00:15:33.000 So we covered this yesterday, and it was a lot of fun to cover the verdict that came in from the Supreme Court.

00:15:37.000 9-0, in case you've forgotten.

00:15:38.000 9-2-0.

00:15:39.000 Yeah, zero.

00:15:39.000 Zero.

00:15:41.000 And the ruling basically stated that individual states could not, in fact, bar presidential candidates from a ballot because this is a national issue.

00:15:51.000 In case you've forgotten, here's a refresher, then we'll get to the media meltdown.

00:15:54.000 We'll do a then and now segment.

00:15:54.000 And you know what?

00:15:56.000 There we go.

00:15:56.000 Because that's fun.

00:15:58.000 Laura, what do we know right now?

00:16:00.000 A really consequential decision has just been handed down.

00:16:02.000 Paula Reid, the court has made a decision.

00:16:04.000 This is a win for former President Trump.

00:16:06.000 Here, the Supreme Court has reversed a ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court that would have removed former President Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the so-called insurrectionist ban.

00:16:19.000 Now this is very much what we expected based on what we saw about a month ago during oral argument.

00:16:24.000 Justices on both sides of the aisle appeared skeptical of Colorado's argument that Trump could be removed by the state under the 14th amendment.

00:16:33.000 You think?

00:16:35.000 Appeared skeptical is shorthand for nine to zero.

00:16:37.000 That's a little skeptical.

00:16:41.000 But Colorado's crazy as hell for letting that thing get this far.

00:16:44.000 They appear to be skeptical to a vote of, let me check, 9-0.

00:16:48.000 Yes.

00:16:48.000 9-0.

00:16:49.000 I believe that would be skepticism.

00:16:50.000 That's a walk-off.

00:16:51.000 Let me read... That's a reservation.

00:16:55.000 They didn't have a 9-0 to end slavery!

00:17:01.000 They did not, sir.

00:17:03.000 They did not.

00:17:04.000 People died to keep it!

00:17:06.000 They really liked slavery!

00:17:06.000 I know!

00:17:09.000 So, according to the court, they said, we conclude that states may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office, but states have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency.

00:17:23.000 And here's the thing, they'll try and do this word play, where they'll say, you know, insurrection, insurrectionist, not convicted.

00:17:30.000 Again, due process matters.

00:17:31.000 It's the same issue that conservatives have had for a very long time.

00:17:33.000 The Me Too thing, Brett Kavanaugh.

00:17:35.000 It's, hold on a second, someone needs to be found guilty.

00:17:38.000 You do have your day in court.

00:17:39.000 And I'm not saying the court system is entirely just, but we haven't even gone through that tilted system yet.

00:17:46.000 So they just use that.

00:17:47.000 It'd be like me going out and saying, oh yeah, Gerald the murderer.

00:17:50.000 What? 0.99

00:17:50.000 Yeah, he's a murderer. 0.99

00:17:52.000 What? 0.99

00:17:52.000 Because I say so. 0.99

00:17:54.000 So Donald Trump responded, President Trump, some people call him former president, some people call him sitting president, I call him sitting president, praising the decision and of course he was going in hard on former Vice President Biden for weaponizing the justice system, which I actually think was a good angle for him to take.

00:18:11.000 I want to start by thanking the Supreme Court for its unanimous decision today.

00:18:17.000 It was a very important decision.

00:18:18.000 We're very well crafted.

00:18:21.000 And I think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together, which our country needs.

00:18:28.000 And they worked long, they worked hard, and frankly, they worked very quickly on something that will be spoken about 100 years from now and 200 years from now.

00:18:39.000 Extremely important.

00:18:41.000 President Biden, number one, stop weaponization.

00:18:45.000 Fight your fight yourself.

00:18:48.000 Don't use prosecutors and judges to go after your opponent to try and damage your opponent so you can win an election.

00:18:55.000 Our country is much bigger than that.

00:18:57.000 The other thing I say to President Biden, close the borders now.

00:19:05.000 By the way, you know, people are saying, hey, pretty tasteful for him.

00:19:09.000 The media of course wasn't too happy with how President Trump went on to celebrate.

00:19:13.000 The people of Philly love me!

00:19:25.000 The people's camp.

00:19:29.000 The best stairs.

00:19:30.000 If that vote comes in and I'm still standing, then I know I've gone the distance.

00:19:36.000 Adrian was horrible.

00:19:37.000 Could have done better. 0.99

00:19:38.000 Geico commercials, gross.

00:19:44.000 By the way, have you noticed that Donald Trump, he really hasn't aged.

00:19:50.000 We have a side-by-side here.

00:19:51.000 Look at that.

00:19:53.000 I think he looks better, and I get it, this doesn't really matter, but compare that to Barack Obama, the side-by-side, like how the presidency ages people.

00:20:01.000 And of course, former Vice President Biden.

00:20:03.000 Here's the thing.

00:20:04.000 Do not underestimate the value of a man who thrives.

00:20:09.000 In conflict.

00:20:10.000 He loves it.

00:20:11.000 There are people like that who you need, and I get they're really tough to deal with, to live with during times of peace.

00:20:16.000 But you need a Churchill.

00:20:17.000 Sometimes you need a Washington.

00:20:19.000 And sometimes you need someone like a Donald Trump.

00:20:20.000 It doesn't age him because this is a guy who wrote The Art of the Comeback.

00:20:23.000 And even if sometimes you would say he bends the rules or in underhanded ways, this is a guy who is motivated by proving people wrong.

00:20:30.000 It gets him up.

00:20:31.000 It gets him excited.

00:20:32.000 And there's something to be said for that.

00:20:35.000 I'm surprised when we did the side-by-side because when you said, like, hey, compare Obama, I was like, yeah, this office ages people in ways that just look like they're going to end their lives essentially by the time they get out of the office.

00:20:35.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:20:47.000 And Trump is just like, well, this is like a Tuesday for me.

00:20:49.000 I do this every day.

00:20:50.000 What do you mean?

00:20:51.000 Like, these are big deals?

00:20:52.000 I do big deals all the time.

00:20:53.000 So does the studio ages you.

00:20:53.000 Yeah.

00:20:55.000 It does a little bit.

00:20:56.000 I look like Madame Tussauds.

00:20:59.000 So here's the thing.

00:21:00.000 This has really changed a lot, obviously, since the Colorado ruling in December.

00:21:05.000 And comparing the media's reaction yesterday to back in Colorado, it's just fun to see the remarkable lack of consistency.

00:21:12.000 And there's value in that because it shows that you shouldn't allow them to guilt you.

00:21:16.000 Stop trying to play their game.

00:21:17.000 The only way to win is to not play.

00:21:20.000 So let's do a segment right now of Now and Then.

00:21:23.000 So let's start with now, I guess.

00:21:33.000 We'll kind of reverse it.

00:21:34.000 Take it.

00:21:35.000 Nice.

00:21:35.000 Reverse it.

00:21:36.000 Ooh, like Mary J. Blige.

00:21:39.000 Put that thing down, flip it, and reverse it.

00:21:41.000 She knows what she was doing.

00:21:42.000 That wasn't Mary J. Blige. 0.81

00:21:43.000 That's whoever I said it was.

00:21:44.000 Missy Elliott.

00:21:45.000 Nah, that doesn't matter.

00:21:47.000 It's not even a real person.

00:21:47.000 Who's that?

00:21:48.000 Look, everyone take your thoughts and put them in a box to the left.

00:21:51.000 That was Lil' Kim. 1.00

00:21:55.000 Noodles!

00:21:59.000 You got the guy who said Diddy Kong.

00:22:00.000 You think we're gonna... There are people who are... I've heard of people who are out of touch with black American culture, but this is ridiculous.

00:22:11.000 Don't push it. 0.97

00:22:13.000 Don't push it real good.

00:22:14.000 now.

00:22:14.000 Now.

00:22:15.000 I think that was salt and pepper.

00:22:21.000 So, the TV talking heads had yesterday, and we covered some of it because we were live,

00:22:28.000 but after that we said, well, we're going to have to cover this as well.

00:22:30.000 They had their biggest meltdown that I can remember since election 2016.

00:22:34.000 I told them that if they would do this, that South Carolina would wrap their arms around them and take care of them.

00:22:42.000 I now officially work for you.

00:22:44.000 There is nothing that you could need that we won't make sure that we deliver.

00:22:48.000 Sorry, right clip.

00:22:49.000 This is the meltdown.

00:22:50.000 My larger reaction is disappointment.

00:22:53.000 Ultimately, the United States Supreme Court disagreed.

00:22:57.000 Votes for Donald Trump will count, and he is on our ballot.

00:23:00.000 The big story today is the Supreme Court once again shoving their gavels up the election.

00:23:04.000 The court's conservatives essentially gave all future insurrectionists the green light to run for federal public office.

00:23:10.000 Just use that term again.

00:23:11.000 And the liberals.

00:23:11.000 It means it's up to us, the voters, to stop them, just like we did in 2020.

00:23:15.000 2024 is the sequel.

00:23:16.000 They're just making it up.

00:23:18.000 And all the justices were making it up.

00:23:20.000 Why though?

00:23:21.000 The Supreme Court handed Trump a second gift in this many weeks on a constitutional technicality.

00:23:26.000 Today is the day that the trial against Donald Trump for January 6th would have started and

00:23:32.000 instead we're talking about this Supreme Court opinion on the 14th amendment.

00:23:37.000 He cannot call himself a victim of the legal system now.

00:23:39.000 The legal system worked.

00:23:40.000 They did not say that January 6th wasn't an insurrection, and they did not say that he didn't engage in insurrection.

00:23:46.000 Instead, the court let him off on a technicality.

00:23:49.000 They did not explicitly deny the lower court findings that Donald Trump was an insurrectionist.

00:23:58.000 Finding that a state cannot make a call that could have a national impact on a federal election.

00:24:06.000 Of course, unless it's about a woman's right to choose, but let's not get into that.

00:24:10.000 In this case, you have the Supreme Court lurching too far to the right,

00:24:14.000 making, as David French said, this part of the 14th Amendment, a dead letter.

00:24:19.000 This is bad news for Donald Trump.

00:24:22.000 And that is he can't raise money off the Senate anymore.

00:24:24.000 I mean, this was the cleanest of all of them.

00:24:32.000 David French. 1.00

00:24:33.000 Writing an op-ed and all of these idiots running with, they just made the 14th Amendment a dead letter. 1.00

00:24:40.000 The justices, including three very liberal justices, made it clear that you're an idiot. 1.00

00:24:48.000 That you can't read. 1.00

00:24:49.000 I mean that literally.

00:24:51.000 You do not have reading comprehension as one of your tools in the toolbox to go to and grab.

00:24:57.000 Instead, it's partisan.

00:24:58.000 The court did it on a technicality.

00:25:00.000 The court just made it a dead letter.

00:25:02.000 No, the court interpreted the Constitution correctly, regardless of political affiliation.

00:25:07.000 One of the only times they've done that in recent memory, and it pisses you off because it benefits a guy.

00:25:11.000 And by the way, he can't claim that he's a victim of the Justice Department or the judicial system anymore. 0.97

00:25:16.000 Have you seen other charges that are crap? This was just the easy one to 0.97

00:25:19.000 go, this should have never happened in the first place. I cannot believe this is the

00:25:24.000 kind of coverage that people are giving. No, no, from people that should know better. People

00:25:29.000 that are constitutional scholars or legal experts are going, I can't believe it. They just,

00:25:33.000 they just jumped. What are you talking about? Well, French is a wiener. I preferred 1.00

00:25:36.000 him when he was a butler. I know.

00:25:37.000 Now, Mr. French. I've never heard of him.

00:25:42.000 No.

00:25:52.000 So, so,

00:26:13.000 yesterday when it happened live, but then, I don't know that I've ever seen a greater self-own where

00:26:19.000 the man refuses to acknowledge it.

00:26:31.000 So this is what he first X'd out, I guess. 0.98

00:26:33.000 He said, The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy.

00:26:36.000 Its members, including Jackson, Kagan, and Sotomayor, have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension, and collectively, the court has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate.

00:26:45.000 It must be dissolved.

00:26:46.000 Now, there was a response from Gunther Eagleman, you know, more right-leaning.

00:26:50.000 He said, Cry more, ellipses, 9-0.

00:26:53.000 Here's the funny part. 0.81

00:26:55.000 Keith Eltman responded, Those weren't tears, fascist. 0.99

00:26:59.000 They're urine. 0.99

00:27:02.000 I'm sure you enjoy being bathed in it.

00:27:04.000 So hold on a second, hold on a second.

00:27:05.000 Let me get this straight.

00:27:07.000 You just igno- and if you have kids, they should leave the room. 0.99

00:27:10.000 You just acknowledged that you have piss on your face. 0.98

00:27:14.000 And your comeback is the implication that this man may also potentially have urine in his bathtub? 0.97

00:27:20.000 But it doesn't matter! 0.84

00:27:21.000 That's a piss wash! 0.99

00:27:22.000 You already have piss on your face! 1.00

00:27:24.000 You lose! 0.99

00:27:25.000 No, it's the, it's the, it's the bathing! 0.75

00:27:28.000 It's the bathing liberal tears! 1.00

00:27:30.000 He's saying, bathe in my piss tears! 0.99

00:27:33.000 Here's some more! 1.00

00:27:34.000 Yes, not since Shooter McGavin confessed to eating pieces of crap for breakfast. 0.99

00:27:40.000 Like, he wrote this, and he thought, he thought, those aren't tears, fascist, they're urine. 0.99

00:27:45.000 Man, that's great. 0.99

00:27:49.000 Wait, you just said you have piss face. 0.99

00:27:51.000 Oh, by the way, that's also, are you crying? 0.99

00:27:53.000 Did someone pee on your face? 0.84

00:27:54.000 Is it piss-mata? 0.61

00:27:54.000 Or did you cry? 0.61

00:27:55.000 I have no idea what this is.

00:27:56.000 He's having a golden shower, it's happening.

00:27:59.000 It's like, yes, I have urine on my face, but I'm certain that you do as well.

00:28:04.000 That's weaker than I am rubber you are glue because at least it's like you know a bounce off where you're saying it doesn't stick.

00:28:10.000 Is he saying that he's he's he's peeing into the urinal ice?

00:28:14.000 I don't know.

00:28:15.000 Dissolving it?

00:28:15.000 Is that when he says it needs to be dissolved?

00:28:17.000 His comeback is I am glue and it sticks to me but you could be glue also.

00:28:23.000 You are spray adhesive. 0.99

00:28:25.000 Either way, you have a bunch of piss on your face, right? 0.99

00:28:25.000 What? 0.99

00:28:28.000 That's correct, yes.

00:28:30.000 There's no getting around that.

00:28:32.000 Forget the egg.

00:28:33.000 It's piss.

00:28:34.000 What? 1.00

00:28:36.000 Those aren't tears, Fascist. 1.00

00:28:38.000 They're urine. 0.99

00:28:39.000 Also, you can't use the plural for urine, I don't think.

00:28:44.000 They're urine?

00:28:44.000 It is urine.

00:28:47.000 Yeah, I don't know.

00:28:48.000 That's a smaller point in the broader picture.

00:28:51.000 He's calling the tears urine.

00:28:54.000 He wrote that reply so angry.

00:28:57.000 Oh man.

00:28:58.000 Like a comeback would have been, even better would have been, I'm not crying, you're crying. 0.96

00:29:03.000 I'm not crying, I bet you have gentlemen pissing on your face. 0.94

00:29:03.000 Alright. 0.94

00:29:07.000 You'd be like, well I don't know where that came from, but okay.

00:29:10.000 You know all those fascists that accept bipartisan Supreme Court decisions? 0.58

00:29:17.000 Do you think when he's like crying over a movie, and a woman comes in and he's like, I'm not crying, it's piss. 0.99

00:29:22.000 This is how I urinate.

00:29:24.000 What?

00:29:24.000 I have a barrel.

00:29:29.000 I pee from my eyes.

00:29:30.000 Who doesn't?

00:29:31.000 That was a good soundbite, thank you. 1.00

00:29:34.000 Does he cry out of his penis? 1.00

00:29:36.000 What the hell is happening? 1.00

00:29:37.000 Well, I guess if that's... then we all cry out of our wiener. 1.00

00:29:42.000 Can you just hit you? 0.99

00:29:44.000 That's not a premature ejaculation. 0.99

00:29:46.000 I'm just crying.

00:29:47.000 I'm just crying.

00:29:48.000 I'm just happy to see you.

00:29:49.000 Don't worry, it happens to lots of guys.

00:29:51.000 I've been told.

00:29:56.000 I don't last long as a lover, but I hear that your passionate lovemaking grows tiresome.

00:30:03.000 What?

00:30:05.000 We gotta send this to him.

00:30:07.000 Oh.

00:30:07.000 Hahahahaha.

00:30:10.000 Ugh, alright.

00:30:12.000 So this brings us back to then, right?

00:30:14.000 They're having a meltdown, but let's go back to Then, which shows you the inconsistency.

00:30:18.000 That's why I say the way to win this game is just to not play.

00:30:22.000 They want to talk about the court overstepping its authority.

00:30:26.000 And by the way, they don't even hide the fact that this is well within their constitutional authority.

00:30:30.000 They just don't like that that is the case.

00:30:31.000 So clear.

00:30:32.000 Whereas back then they were gloating that the Colorado court obviously ruled in a way that was unconstitutional.

00:30:38.000 I hope the justices see through his lies and underline that it is within state authority to keep off oath-breaking insurrectionists from our ballot.

00:30:48.000 Santa came early last night.

00:30:50.000 When the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump is disqualified from holding office.

00:30:59.000 You go, Colorado.

00:31:01.000 anyone who engages in insurrection is ineligible to run for political office.

00:31:07.000 For this moment in time this is a benchmark and a punishment. 0.96

00:31:13.000 What a nerd.

00:31:41.000 Thanks, Michael! 0.78

00:31:42.000 What up, Steele?

00:31:43.000 Go back and look at his blog when he was RNC chairman.

00:31:45.000 That's actually something he did.

00:31:46.000 He did that.

00:31:47.000 By the way, Kintanji, she's also black. 0.97

00:31:51.000 I think you picked on Clarence Thomas because he's black and you're like, he's gonna tie himself in knots.

00:31:55.000 Did she also tie herself in knots? 0.99

00:31:58.000 I think you need to answer for that.

00:31:59.000 Well, they're big on knots.

00:32:01.000 You just called him an Uncle Tom!

00:32:02.000 Okay, that's exactly what he was doing!

00:32:04.000 I have piss on my face. 0.67

00:32:10.000 Yes.

00:32:12.000 Was he raised with an expression that he didn't understand? 1.00

00:32:15.000 You know, maybe he doesn't get the whole pissing, like, which one is the bad part, whether it's on you- Who got their dick caught in the cookie jar? 1.00

00:32:22.000 That sounds like a foreigner. 1.00

00:32:25.000 He's mixing metaphors, you know? 1.00

00:32:27.000 I know you are, but I'm a piece of shit. 1.00

00:32:28.000 That's not- You're missing. 1.00

00:32:31.000 Actually, no, that nails it.

00:32:32.000 What?

00:32:36.000 What are you, Asian?

00:32:39.000 Weird.

00:32:41.000 So, here's the thing.

00:32:42.000 I'm sorry, guys.

00:32:43.000 You can hit the like button if it's okay.

00:32:44.000 I just, every now and then, you don't, I can't, I don't have a chip in my brain for what Keith Olbermann was saying.

00:32:51.000 Keith Olbermann?

00:32:54.000 Is that me or is that you?

00:32:55.000 That's you!

00:32:55.000 That's me?

00:32:56.000 Oh, well, yeah, well, you do realize... Just now?

00:32:56.000 That's you!

00:32:59.000 No, no, no, no, no.

00:33:00.000 I'm sure that's from years ago.

00:33:01.000 He's watching?

00:33:02.000 That's so sweet!

00:33:03.000 No, no, true story.

00:33:04.000 After he was fired from MSNBC, I used to host the CPAC Ballroom, and I went out as Keith Olbermann, looking for work, like, trying to get a contract with Maybelline, and it actually made it into the news, like, Keith Olbermann is a surprise guest speaker at CPAC.

00:33:16.000 Maybe it's Olbermann.

00:33:20.000 Maybe he's born with it.

00:33:20.000 Perhaps.

00:33:22.000 Maybe it's some urine.

00:33:26.000 It's piss-based concealer.

00:33:28.000 Alright, quick.

00:33:29.000 Somebody with a Keith Olbermann face with piss tears, go.

00:33:32.000 Yes. 0.95

00:33:33.000 Is that mascara or urine?

00:33:35.000 It's urine.

00:33:36.000 It's absolutely urine.

00:33:38.000 Good complexion. 0.99

00:33:40.000 You're bad.

00:33:42.000 You're not drinking enough water.

00:33:42.000 It's urine.

00:33:43.000 The problem with the left, it's really this simple.

00:33:50.000 There's no one around them to just say, what?

00:33:54.000 They don't bully each other.

00:33:56.000 That's really all it is.

00:33:57.000 I remember when Tom Hanks went on Morning Joe.

00:33:59.000 It's in my head right now because I just saw Joe talking about whatever it was that he was saying.

00:34:03.000 And he said, you know, we only entered World War II because of, I think he said racism and jingoism or ethnocentrism and jingoism.

00:34:10.000 And he said it and I remember watching it going.

00:34:13.000 Huh?

00:34:13.000 No one's questioning that?

00:34:15.000 Like, it was so dumb that you're sitting there going, oh, that's right, no one with these people just says, what? 0.92

00:34:22.000 Keith Urban has gone so long in his life without anyone just saying, that doesn't make sense, that they become so disconnected. 0.96

00:34:28.000 And there is a value in that.

00:34:29.000 That's the value of Donald Trump as a bull in a China shop, because there's a disconnect between the swamp, the elites, and you. 0.64

00:34:35.000 No one out there, you watching right now, can you imagine when you're razzing any of your friends, just one of them saying, yes, it's urine on my face. 0.99

00:34:46.000 And you would be known as piss face forever. 0.95

00:34:48.000 And you letting them get away with it? 0.97

00:34:50.000 They get away with it! 0.99

00:34:52.000 Because no one says, that's really dumb. 0.98

00:34:54.000 Hey Keith, why don't you turn the other cheek for us? 0.99

00:34:57.000 My piss cheek? 0.98

00:34:58.000 Oh no, they're both piss cheeks. 0.94

00:35:02.000 All the greats have their calling cards. 0.96

00:35:04.000 So, the piss bandits?

00:35:06.000 Hahahaha! 0.76

00:35:13.000 Watch, it's going to be the next R. Kelly video.

00:35:17.000 The biggest indictment, though, of the media in this whole saga, it comes from the very liberal Supreme Court justices.

00:35:24.000 Let me read this for you here.

00:35:26.000 And this comes from, I believe, can someone let me know, is this?

00:35:30.000 This comes directly from the Supreme Court.

00:35:32.000 But who wrote this?

00:35:33.000 Was it Brown Jackson?

00:35:35.000 Was it Sotomayor?

00:35:36.000 Or usually they have one person who's responsible for writing it.

00:35:38.000 But this is the dissenting viewpoint.

00:35:41.000 It says, the contrary conclusion that a handful... Well, hold on a second.

00:35:44.000 There was no dissenting viewpoint.

00:35:45.000 What I mean is these are the liberal justices having to justify their opinion or explain it.

00:35:52.000 No, showing your work, like Long Division.

00:35:53.000 They said, the contrary conclusion that a handful of officials in a few states could decide the nation's next president would be especially surprising with respect to Section 3.

00:36:03.000 The Reconstruction arguments were specifically designed as an expansion of federal power and an intrusion on state sovereignty.

00:36:09.000 Section 3 marks the first time the Constitution placed substantive limits on a state's authority to choose its own officials.

00:36:18.000 Given that context, it would defy logic for Section 3 to give states new powers, keyword being new powers, to determine who may hold the presidency.

00:36:28.000 This is basically what they're saying.

00:36:30.000 a small, relatively, court in Colorado doesn't get to determine the presidency for the rest of the country.

00:36:35.000 Right.

00:36:36.000 That's... 1.00

00:36:37.000 Also, you're all idiots. 1.00

00:36:39.000 Yes. 1.00

00:36:39.000 Because this, by the way, this is the three of the liberal justices getting together to write 1.00

00:36:44.000 this opinion. So it's not any one of them. It's all three of them agreeing with this and saying,

00:36:48.000 look, the absolute most clear thing that the United States government was doing was intruding

00:36:55.000 on states' rights in this case to make sure that they had less power to determine this kind of

00:37:00.000 Because of those insurrectionists essentially at the time just sending representatives back to Congress and saying, hey, nothing happened, we're all good, right?

00:37:07.000 We're just going to change things from the inside.

00:37:08.000 They're like, no, no, no, you can't do that. 0.92

00:37:10.000 For Colorado to then think that that gives them new authority Is one of the stupidest things that I've ever seen in our legal system, and we have Kyle Rittenhouse to look at. 1.00

00:37:19.000 That was pretty dumb! 0.99

00:37:20.000 Yeah, well this is also the reason that the left hates the Electoral College. 0.98

00:37:23.000 Again, that was designed as a system of checks and balances to ensure that, especially in a new country where people are moving, they're migrating west, that New York City doesn't determine The representatives for the entire country.

00:37:34.000 That's the reason for the Electoral College.

00:37:36.000 Now you may disagree with it, you may say now that you think it's irrelevant or that there's a problem if the popular vote has some kind of discrepancy with the Electoral College vote, I still believe that it's necessary, but these people don't believe that there should be any checks and balances.

00:37:47.000 Oh wait, we don't get what we want?

00:37:48.000 Pack the court.

00:37:49.000 We don't like the Electoral College?

00:37:50.000 Let's do away with it.

00:37:51.000 And let's just, while they're talking about constitutionality or this court overreaching, Here's the thing, this is, and you need to understand, I've always said don't attribute to malice what can be chalked up to incompetence, right?

00:38:04.000 That's an old expression.

00:38:05.000 Usually I would apply that.

00:38:07.000 Not in this case.

00:38:08.000 Not in this case.

00:38:09.000 This is a group, and when I say group, I mean today's progressive left, and by the way, the entire DNC, and the media, entertainment, industrial establishment, they have knowingly violated the Constitution.

00:38:21.000 How do I know?

00:38:22.000 Because they said so.

00:38:23.000 So when you have the CDC eviction moratorium, right, which is effectively rent forgiveness, where no, no, you can't evict someone who hasn't paid rent, which of course put many mom and pop home providers out of business forever because they didn't get any kind of forgiveness.

00:38:34.000 You had this president and you had these, of course, the Supreme Court eventually said, you can't do that.

00:38:38.000 They said, well, you know what?

00:38:39.000 It's going to take a few months before it gets there.

00:38:40.000 So let me buy your votes.

00:38:42.000 Student loan forgiveness.

00:38:43.000 Joe Biden literally acknowledged that this is probably unconstitutional and will be ruled against by the courts, but it'll give us a few months.

00:38:49.000 Think about federally mandating vaccines.

00:38:51.000 For government employees, of course they would have, they wanted to do it for everybody.

00:38:55.000 Now, taking President Trump off of the ballots because of a court in Colorado, they knowingly violate the Constitution.

00:39:00.000 They don't care about the Constitution.

00:39:02.000 And I'm not just falsely attributing motive here.

00:39:05.000 They've said it.

00:39:06.000 They have said, with these actions, we know it's unconstitutional, but we're going to do it anyway.

00:39:11.000 Please vote for me when you remember this handout.

00:39:15.000 This is what you do.

00:39:15.000 You enact a policy that you know is going to fail eventually, but you can destroy as much of the fabric of this country in the meantime as you possibly can, and face no consequences.

00:39:26.000 That's exactly right.

00:39:26.000 It's lawyer business.

00:39:29.000 Do what you can get away with for as long as you can.

00:39:30.000 So I guess the question is, to conservatives, if you could act like a Democrat for a day, what's the one policy that you would make a reality?

00:39:37.000 I know, if you were actually a fascist, like the left.

00:39:42.000 I don't know, maybe a border wall.

00:39:43.000 That's a good one.

00:39:44.000 That would be a good one.

00:39:45.000 More of a structure.

00:39:47.000 Gators.

00:39:48.000 Hey, you want to let people know?

00:39:49.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:39:50.000 So merch, make sure you go to CrowderShop.com right now.

00:39:53.000 Every dollar spent gets you entered to win a one-year emergency food supply.

00:39:58.000 By the way, MyPatriotSupply, ReadyHour, they're part of the same team.

00:40:01.000 So nobody go out there and be like, ooh, you're cheating.

00:40:02.000 We're not cheating.

00:40:03.000 No, no, we're not cheating.

00:40:04.000 That's valuable.

00:40:05.000 Have we announced the truck winner yet?

00:40:07.000 No.

00:40:07.000 Okay, well that's going to be coming soon.

00:40:08.000 Very soon.

00:40:09.000 Somebody's going to win a truck in 10k and then they're going to get to meet us because we're going to have to give them the truck.

00:40:14.000 Yeah, I can't win the truck though, right?

00:40:16.000 I mean, I don't think so.

00:40:17.000 Can I take it?

00:40:18.000 Can I steal it?

00:40:18.000 Did you buy merch?

00:40:19.000 Well, you have to buy.

00:40:20.000 I already won it.

00:40:21.000 You can't.

00:40:22.000 Okay.

00:40:23.000 What if I pee in my own face? 0.98

00:40:28.000 That's my new favorite way of saying egg on my face is, wow, piss on my face. 0.99

00:40:32.000 Piss on my face. 0.96

00:40:34.000 The old expression like, don't piss on my face and tell me it's raining? 0.98

00:40:38.000 Keith Urban is just like, please piss on my face and I know it's not raining.

00:40:41.000 I'm fine with it.

00:40:44.000 I've never heard that phrase though.

00:40:45.000 Never.

00:40:46.000 Ever.

00:40:46.000 Is that a real phrase?

00:40:47.000 Hey, don't piss on my forehead and tell me it's raining?

00:40:49.000 Yeah, I never heard that.

00:40:49.000 Right.

00:40:51.000 You ever heard that?

00:40:52.000 No, it is a real phrase.

00:40:53.000 It is a real phrase, but not his phrase.

00:40:55.000 Oh, okay. 1.00

00:40:55.000 Because he's an idiot. 1.00

00:40:56.000 So, he's saying, please piss on my forehead and urine on my face. 1.00

00:40:56.000 Yes. 1.00

00:40:59.000 Begging.

00:41:00.000 Actually, you can just tell me it's urine.

00:41:02.000 So many good sound bites today.

00:41:03.000 I know.

00:41:03.000 Oh, come on.

00:41:05.000 All right, so this is also why the left is freaking out, right?

00:41:07.000 This is why they want to strip you of your power.

00:41:09.000 Massive news.

00:41:10.000 They want to strip you of your voting power right now.

00:41:13.000 I told you they're going to go after Trump.

00:41:14.000 They're going to use all these intelligence agencies, right, the three-letter agencies that they can.

00:41:19.000 They're going to try and abuse the courts to prevent him from being the nominee.

00:41:22.000 Why?

00:41:22.000 Because they know if he's a nominee, he very likely wins.

00:41:25.000 And so once they get through that phase, if it doesn't work, and we all have a lot of work to do, right? It could go

00:41:30.000 either way. They're going to go after you. The last choice for a politician is to go after the

00:41:34.000 voter base. They try and separate you from, you know, the quote-unquote generals and say, it's

00:41:40.000 not you, it's Trump. That's why Hillary Clinton got into so much trouble with basket of deplorables. 1.00

00:41:45.000 That was her ultimate downfall because she attacked the voters. 1.00

00:41:48.000 They will do it, though, if they can't actually get Donald Trump.

00:41:51.000 Now, the reason they're so scared is because the latest New York Times poll, it came out a couple days ago, but I believe they released some final numbers yesterday or today.

00:42:00.000 Horrible news for former Vice President Joe Biden.

00:42:02.000 So in a national election, a general, Trump beats him 48 to 43.

00:42:07.000 Forty-eight to forty-three, but I want to get into some other numbers here because people look at that, they go, oh, it kind of oscillates.

00:42:12.000 But again, if you look historically in 2016 and you look historically at 2020, Donald Trump tends to actually, well, he was always losing at this point in time, and then he would close the gap.

00:42:23.000 He hasn't been at this, and certainly not from the New York Times polls.

00:42:26.000 These are left-leaning polls.

00:42:28.000 Uh, and I do think there's a huge, historically it's true, uh, it wasn't as big in 2020, there's a huge contingency of secret voters, especially now as you relate it to the border wall immigration issue.

00:42:37.000 You can, you can kind of look at, uh, you can feel how the winds are blowing, but here's some, here's some demographics that are very interesting.

00:42:43.000 White voters, Donald Trump beats Biden 53 to 40.

00:42:45.000 Okay, no surprise there.

00:42:47.000 But with black voters, Donald Trump Actually gets 23% of the vote to Biden 66.

00:42:54.000 That is the biggest Republican since Nixon.

00:42:57.000 It's not a majority, but that's a huge switch.

00:43:00.000 Now this is one that was very significant to me.

00:43:03.000 A larger portion of the population than black Americans, Hispanic voters.

00:43:07.000 Trump beats Biden 46 to 40.

00:43:10.000 So Trump beats Biden with Hispanic voters by a wider margin than he wins the general.

00:43:16.000 That is insane.

00:43:17.000 Those are terrible poll numbers.

00:43:19.000 Those are horrible poll numbers.

00:43:20.000 And I don't think he's, I don't think, you guys can let me know, I don't think a Republican nationally has won the Hispanic vote.

00:43:25.000 We've talked about in Florida, obviously, we have a lot of Cuban Americans, they tend to be the most conservative voting bloc in America, outside of actually, funny enough, Millennials and Gen Z Cuban Americans are becoming more conservative again.

00:43:36.000 But outside of that, I don't think anyone, any Republican, you can let me know in chat or comment if I'm speaking out of turn, I don't think they've Actually won the Hispanic vote.

00:43:44.000 They've mitigated losses, but let me give you some interesting numbers here, because you look at that general, you say, okay, that's pretty close.

00:43:50.000 Sure, but let's apply that same logic when we're talking about, for example, the Hispanic vote.

00:43:54.000 Where would there be a significant state where that might change the outcome of the election?

00:43:59.000 Before you even get to election shenanigans, before you even get to social media throttling the Hunter Biden story, just looking at these demographics, Arizona in 2020, assuming that you believe what you've been told, President Trump lost by 10,500 votes, give or take.

00:44:16.000 The Arizona Hispanic voting population is 1.9 million people.

00:44:21.000 So in 2020, Donald Trump got 37% of the Hispanic vote.

00:44:26.000 So if you were to apply 46%, and again, I get that this is hypothetical, but it is significant, if President Trump were to hold these numbers, 46% of that vote, he gets 107,000 more votes than in 2020.

00:44:39.000 107,000 more votes.

00:44:39.000 Lost by 10,000.

00:44:40.000 Boom.

00:44:40.000 Trump wins Arizona.

00:44:45.000 Think about that.

00:44:46.000 Now let's use another example, Georgia, if we're going to use a black vote. 0.86

00:44:48.000 And I know it's 13% of the population.

00:44:50.000 Oh, and I think they added a note in there, so no Republican has ever won the Hispanic vote.

00:44:54.000 Right.

00:44:55.000 That's what we thought, but yeah, confirmed.

00:44:58.000 Let's look at Georgia. 0.95

00:44:59.000 Again, 13% of the population, but they are a more significant portion of the population in Georgia, meaning black voters.

00:45:04.000 The 2020 result, Donald Trump lost by 11,800 votes, give or take.

00:45:11.000 The Georgia black voting population is 2.4 million people.

00:45:15.000 Donald Trump only won 11% of the black vote in 2020.

00:45:20.000 So if he were to get 23% of the black vote in 2024, and these are broad numbers, right, this is assuming that

00:45:20.000 Wow.

00:45:27.000 everyone votes, but again, these numbers tend to be pretty congruent with

00:45:30.000 the people who actually do go in and vote, depending on if you're using likely voters or

00:45:33.000 registered voters.

00:45:34.000 If Trump were to get 23% of the black vote in 2024, he wins by 312,000 more votes.

00:45:37.000 vote in 2024, he wins by 312,000 more votes.

00:45:41.000 Or sorry, he gets 312,000 more votes than he did in 2020.

00:45:44.000 This is the highest percentage of black votes since Richard Nixon in 1960.

00:45:50.000 And that was when he lost to Kennedy, I believe he got 32%, and then it went down to the teens later on.

00:45:55.000 And I believe that probably would have something to do with the Lyndon Johnson model.

00:45:58.000 The whole Southern strategy was actually the left trying to say that Republicans were racist, and it worked like a charm. 1.00

00:46:04.000 Just those two states.

00:46:07.000 Think about that for a second.

00:46:08.000 We haven't even gotten into Michigan.

00:46:10.000 Pennsylvania.

00:46:11.000 Nevada.

00:46:12.000 Potentially Colorado.

00:46:14.000 There are a lot of states where this could have a significant impact.

00:46:17.000 And this is what's most interesting to me about this poll.

00:46:21.000 It's not a simple favorability as far as do you like this person in general. They asked,

00:46:25.000 the New York Times, they asked if you believe that Biden and or Trump's policies have hurt

00:46:31.000 or helped them. So the question was about policy. With Biden, 18% believed when polled that his

00:46:37.000 policies helped him.

00:46:39.000 I know it's a low number, but it should be zero.

00:46:42.000 I don't understand.

00:46:44.000 Baby steps though.

00:46:45.000 43% believed that Biden's policies hurt him.

00:46:48.000 With President Trump, 40% believed that Trump's policies have helped him, and only 25% believe that they've hurt him.

00:46:56.000 When people say, people say, oh it's just there's a cult of personality with Donald Trump.

00:46:59.000 Well you can't have it both ways.

00:47:00.000 You can't have it, you can't say it's a cult of personality and then say don't vote for him because of personality.

00:47:04.000 When it comes to policies, time after time, I don't know that there's ever been a poll to the opposite effect.

00:47:08.000 When it comes to policies, you actually have to look past kind of the bombastic nature of Donald Trump because his policies were so much more effective and you see the numbers.

00:47:17.000 Americans agree with that.

00:47:19.000 So I think that Donald Trump focusing on that, as he did in his statement, discussing, you know, the justice system, discussing the border, staying on that issue.

00:47:25.000 People would have told him it was a losing issue in 2016.

00:47:28.000 Ah, the border issue, they'll say you're racist.

00:47:29.000 Not anymore.

00:47:29.000 Guess what?

00:47:30.000 It's a winning issue.

00:47:32.000 And this just happened right now, I guess.

00:47:34.000 Yeah, CNN this morning just dropped a new article actually going after this New York Times poll.

00:47:39.000 So this is CNN because they have to run interference.

00:47:42.000 It says the New York Times is facing backlash over its coverage of Donald Trump and the 2024 election from CNN.

00:47:48.000 See you then!

00:47:50.000 By the way, there's an expletive in the next overlay, so they won't bring it up, but you can just mute, you can kind of censor it if you want.

00:47:55.000 So the article quoted CUNY professor Suni, I don't know if that's how they pronounce it, a professor, Jeff Jarvis, who posted this on his Threads account, and he said, the effing times, it follows up yesterday's awful poll with another.

00:48:13.000 That they even asked this question is evidence of the bias, the agenda, in their poll.

00:48:18.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:48:19.000 Because the New York Times is known for being conservatively biased.

00:48:22.000 Yes!

00:48:23.000 What?

00:48:24.000 Who made age an quote-unquote issue?

00:48:27.000 Um, the guy who's dying.

00:48:31.000 And forgetting his name almost.

00:48:33.000 The credulous times falling into the right wing's projection.

00:48:36.000 This is not journalism.

00:48:38.000 Shameful.

00:48:38.000 This is not journalism.

00:48:40.000 No one cares about Biden's age, except a vast majority of Americans are concerned about his age.

00:48:40.000 Not like me.

00:48:45.000 Screw you! 1.00

00:48:46.000 This isn't journalism. 0.99

00:48:47.000 I'm on threads.

00:48:48.000 Yes!

00:48:49.000 Hahahahaha! 0.90

00:48:51.000 Seriously?

00:48:53.000 Hahahahaha! 0.90

00:48:55.000 How's that going for you over there?

00:48:56.000 New York Times.

00:48:57.000 They're just playing right into the right-wing's projection.

00:49:00.000 By talking to Americans.

00:49:03.000 By asking people questions about how they feel.

00:49:06.000 And the reason that they're making age an issue now is because it came up even when it wasn't being asked.

00:49:10.000 The vast majority of Americans are like, yeah, we're concerned.

00:49:12.000 And by the way, they're concerned about Donald Trump's age, too.

00:49:14.000 They're both two old guys.

00:49:16.000 Former Vice President Joe Biden does not seem all there.

00:49:20.000 He's not.

00:49:21.000 That's why he's not being charged with putting classified documents next to his Corvette.

00:49:26.000 Like, he doesn't know where he is.

00:49:27.000 I didn't even know he has a Corvette anymore.

00:49:31.000 Huh?

00:49:32.000 It was a model car.

00:49:33.000 Where's my Gremlin?

00:49:34.000 Yeah, and Trump looks better.

00:49:37.000 So how bad does it have to be, this is another question for you, how bad does it have to be for Joseph Biden when not even the New York Times can carry his water and CNN contributors, I don't know what the term is for this guy, they have to go out and say, I can't believe that the New York Times is not doing the bidding.

00:49:53.000 for Joe Biden. They really, really... this guy really, really needs to be dragged across the

00:49:57.000 finish line by the media. And I hope that doesn't happen because they did that last time by punting

00:50:02.000 the Hunter Biden story, by suppressing all of the information that we really should have known about

00:50:06.000 the Biden family, by falsely maligning Donald Trump as an insurrectionist who peacefully handed over

00:50:11.000 the reins of power. So they had to last time drag him across the finish line.

00:50:16.000 I think they're a little bit scared to.

00:50:18.000 If only, yes, they're ideologically motivated, but if only out of their own self-interest.

00:50:22.000 They're like, you know what?

00:50:23.000 Eyes are on us now.

00:50:24.000 Last time we kind of pulled the trick, but people are looking for it.

00:50:27.000 And what shred of credibility we have left, we are going to lose.

00:50:31.000 Yeah.

00:50:31.000 So they might have to, I guess, sort of put on a veneer of being objective.

00:50:36.000 That's my thought.

00:50:37.000 I don't know.

00:50:38.000 They're doubling down.

00:50:39.000 Yeah, they're doubling down.

00:50:42.000 In this next story, they're doing it again.

00:50:45.000 It's not completely about that.

00:50:47.000 We'll talk about Catherine Herod real quickly, but she's, she is, she was

00:50:51.000 looking into some shady stuff, the Bidens and all of a sudden, well, I mean, this is.

00:50:55.000 So let me say.

00:50:55.000 She said.

00:50:56.000 Oh.

00:51:34.000 That's a lot of work. 0.99

00:51:39.000 I'm not smart enough to be dumb enough for this. 0.96

00:51:42.000 It really is, it's difficult. 0.99

00:51:43.000 You're like, how do I think up a really bad insult?

00:51:45.000 Like Keith Urban, yeah.

00:51:45.000 Cardi B said that.

00:51:50.000 That's Keith Urban also said, my neck, my back.

00:51:56.000 I'm pretty sure that was Jennifer Hudson actually. 0.78

00:52:00.000 That was, yes.

00:52:03.000 Those were wise words spoken by Fantasia.

00:52:06.000 Mary J. Morissette.

00:52:10.000 I want to hear that mad joke.

00:52:12.000 I really do.

00:52:14.000 Isn't it plutonic?

00:52:16.000 Fair, fair, fair enough.

00:52:23.000 I'm doing my best Keith Olbermann, okay?

00:52:24.000 No, it's difficult.

00:52:25.000 It's hard.

00:52:25.000 It's difficult.

00:52:26.000 All right.

00:52:27.000 I'll set this up because it's going to be Gerald Nose Thursday very soon.

00:52:29.000 So last week, a U.S.

00:52:31.000 District Court judge held this journalist—oh, well, no, by the way, a veteran journalist who's been doing this for a while, Catherine Herridge—in contempt.

00:52:39.000 And this is scary for anyone out there who believes in investigative journalism or believes that it's important as it relates to our constitutional republic.

00:52:48.000 She was held in contempt.

00:52:50.000 For refusing to reveal confidential sources.

00:52:53.000 A federal judge holding journalist Katherine Harridge in civil contempt for refusing to reveal her sources in a series of Fox News reports from 2017.

00:53:01.000 She's also facing a fine of $800 a day.

00:53:05.000 Harridge is expected to appeal.

00:53:07.000 Side note, she looks like that actress Isabella Rossellini. 1.00

00:53:10.000 Yeah.

00:53:12.000 She was in Blue Velvet.

00:53:13.000 Now, let's move on.

00:53:18.000 Let's move on, it's time for Jail and Those Things. 0.85

00:53:33.000 That's just your hair.

00:53:34.000 Oh, man.

00:53:37.000 That's a blowout.

00:53:38.000 Sometimes you stand in front of a fan and then spray it.

00:53:41.000 Yeah, I guess.

00:53:42.000 Or you don't comb your hair at all.

00:53:44.000 I don't know.

00:53:44.000 Maybe.

00:53:45.000 It happens.

00:53:45.000 I saw the Lady of the Park, I'd be like, how much for the hot dogs?

00:53:50.000 It's William's mom.

00:53:53.000 Leaping out a window.

00:53:54.000 Alright, so look, this ruling actually comes, like I said, with a little bit of, I don't know, questionable timing.

00:53:59.000 Just weeks after she was, I'm sorry, just weeks after this ruling, she was fired by CBS, and she was working on multiple stories right now about Hunter Biden's involvement with, you know, Joe Biden, the big guy, and all the stuff that they were dealing with, Burisma, and all of that, that he's been testifying in front of Congress for recently.

00:54:15.000 Surprise, surprise, they got rid of her, but she's being targeted When she's reporting on an issue that might affect the government, right?

00:54:21.000 And this has happened before, obviously with Project Veritas when they had the Ashley Biden diary issue.

00:54:25.000 They didn't even actually run that story.

00:54:27.000 It got leaked out and it didn't really go viral, but all of a sudden the FBI shows up and, give us that fake diary!

00:54:32.000 Why are you here for a fake diary?

00:54:33.000 That kind of thing.

00:54:34.000 It's like, we covered it when that happened.

00:54:35.000 We're like, you guys just verified that it's real because you showed up.

00:54:38.000 And basically it was just an opportunity, it seems maybe, for the FBI just to get information

00:54:44.000 on Project Veritas and get access to all of their data.

00:54:47.000 They seized a lot of stuff that they didn't necessarily have to seize because he had a

00:54:50.000 diary.

00:54:51.000 Remember they seized everything from Rudy Giuliani's apartment except the Hunter Biden

00:54:54.000 laptop.

00:54:55.000 Except the thing that we, yeah, they already had that.

00:54:56.000 That's the one thing they left.

00:54:57.000 They were like, oh, we've had that Hunter Biden laptop for, I don't know, like eight

00:54:59.000 months now, so no, no, no, we're good.

00:55:01.000 Guy likes his M&Ms.

00:55:02.000 They also did it with Steve Baker, right?

00:55:04.000 So Steve Baker from the Blaze, I think he was TPUSA at the time when he was at the Capitol on January 6th.

00:55:09.000 He got arrested and perp-walked, essentially, just over the weekend, I think on Friday or Saturday, for his reporting that day.

00:55:16.000 And, obviously, they let him go immediately.

00:55:18.000 They're like, ah, we have no intention of actually, you know, making you serve any jail time or anything like that.

00:55:22.000 But this is what happens.

00:55:23.000 Journalists go and they do their job, and then the government finds a way To come in and go, you know what, we don't like what you're doing.

00:55:30.000 That's what it seems like at the very least.

00:55:32.000 Which government?

00:55:33.000 The Chinese government?

00:55:34.000 The Russian government?

00:55:35.000 The North Korean government?

00:55:36.000 Which one is it then?

00:55:37.000 That was the one takeaway that people didn't like, and of course I don't trust Putin any further than I can throw him, but when Tucker interviewed him he was saying, you don't think your government does this?

00:55:44.000 You don't think your government prosecutes journalists?

00:55:46.000 You don't think your government uses the system?

00:55:47.000 And you know what, that's one area where he had a point.

00:55:49.000 This doesn't feel like the United States of America.

00:55:50.000 And one thing to keep in mind, altruistic journalists only exist in the movies, you

00:55:56.000 know, or some like where it's Erin Brockovich because there's some kind of contaminated 1.00

00:55:59.000 tap water.

00:56:00.000 It's true.

00:56:01.000 And they go, oh my gosh, they're taking it to the government.

00:56:02.000 Then all of a sudden, when Barack Obama became president, there were no more stories out

00:56:05.000 there about corrupt government.

00:56:07.000 There were no more films like that.

00:56:09.000 And the left despises actual investigative journalism.

00:56:13.000 To give you an idea, this is what also happens in a soft way with YouTube.

00:56:17.000 So for example, there's single party consent.

00:56:18.000 This is a law.

00:56:19.000 Before we get into the selective prosecution here, single party consent means that you are well within the bounds of the law to record a conversation without the other party knowing.

00:56:28.000 It means single party consent.

00:56:29.000 You need to be the only one.

00:56:31.000 They don't need to know.

00:56:32.000 That's pivotal for investigative journalism.

00:56:33.000 I believe there are 11 states that are dual party consent states.

00:56:36.000 And investigative journalists go to great lengths to ensure that they are following the law.

00:56:41.000 Then YouTube, for example, says, oh, we don't care.

00:56:43.000 That person, I don't know, maybe a corrupt government official, doesn't want the video out there.

00:56:47.000 So we'll remove it.

00:56:48.000 We've had it happen with Change My Minds, where someone sat down, signed a release, spelled their name out on camera saying, I consent.

00:56:55.000 We gave it to YouTube and they said, yeah, but then afterwards they said they didn't want it.

00:56:58.000 So I go, but it's also in a single party consent state.

00:56:59.000 We don't need any of those things.

00:57:01.000 Think about that.

00:57:02.000 A room full of 10 people.

00:57:04.000 As far as the media, as far as new media can determine exactly what it is that you see by not even following the law.

00:57:12.000 They create new laws when convenient for them.

00:57:14.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:57:15.000 And in the case of YouTube doing that Hunter Biden laptop on X and then I don't know if you remember we were doing a live stream and Facebook took us down back way back when we were doing Facebook stuff and they're like, oh yeah, I don't know.

00:57:25.000 They issued a copyright strike for it and they're like, yeah, but we weren't.

00:57:27.000 It's obviously parody.

00:57:28.000 We're actually taking something and changing it.

00:57:30.000 Later on, in each of those cases, later on, they come back and say, oh, you're right, but it's already done.

00:57:35.000 Our Hunter Biden stream, I believe, with Rudy Giuliani was taken down on YouTube.

00:57:38.000 Yeah!

00:57:38.000 When we were doing it, that was taken down.

00:57:40.000 And Twitter came back and said, you know what, we should have left that up.

00:57:42.000 Well, it's too late for that now.

00:57:44.000 Now, it's the exact same thing that the Democrats do.

00:57:46.000 They do something, they know it's illegal, but the courts are going to take a little bit of time to get to it, so it has the same effect.

00:57:51.000 No apologies ever given, no reason why.

00:57:53.000 And you'll see more of the abuse of the courts.

00:57:55.000 The point that I'm making is because now with X being purchased by Musk, now with Rumble being an alternative to YouTube, they're going, okay, We don't have a stranglehold on information, so now let's actually prosecute and jail or hold in contempt investigative journalists.

00:58:07.000 Let's make sure we send a shockwave of fear so that everyone else out there knows better.

00:58:12.000 By the way, you can send your stories to LWCTipsAtProtonMail.com.

00:58:16.000 We have an investigative unit here.

00:58:18.000 We will go to jail before we give up our story.

00:58:20.000 It doesn't matter.

00:58:22.000 It doesn't matter.

00:58:23.000 We've been very, very clear about that.

00:58:24.000 Yeah.

00:58:25.000 Well, let me give you a timeline for the Catherine Herod story, because I don't think a lot of people know this.

00:58:29.000 So, in 2017, in February, her team released a story showing that a Department of Defense was funding a school with ties to the CCP.

00:58:38.000 And you're like, okay, well, what kind of ties?

00:58:39.000 Well, Herod, they obtained records from the FBI on the University of Management and Technology.

00:58:44.000 It's about four miles away from the Pentagon.

00:58:47.000 The records revealed strong connections between this university and President Yen Ping Chen and the CCP, right?

00:58:53.000 Photos obtained by... Communist Chinese Party for the uninitiated.

00:58:55.000 CCP!

00:58:56.000 Communist Chinese Party, right?

00:58:57.000 The photos obtained by Heritage also show that Chen served in the People's Liberation Army.

00:59:03.000 Now, here's the thing.

00:59:04.000 When asked if she had ties, like, to any foreign governments or ever served in the military, she's like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, just the People's Liberation Army.

00:59:12.000 You actually served them.

00:59:13.000 You weren't just a member of the Communist Party.

00:59:15.000 She put them on their back foot. 0.59

00:59:16.000 Do you?

00:59:16.000 She said, no.

00:59:17.000 They said, no.

00:59:20.000 Now, here's the other thing.

00:59:21.000 Harrods revealed how they continued to receive funding from the Department of Defense, and that is a very curious thing.

00:59:29.000 Also, for this lady, no charges were ever filed for her.

00:59:33.000 None of them.

00:59:34.000 Nothing happened to her.

00:59:35.000 No issues, right?

00:59:36.000 So that's 2017.

00:59:36.000 Even PETA, by the way, is showing support for Harrods after Chen's new cookbook was leaked.

00:59:40.000 Yeah.

00:59:41.000 So they just... My point is, strange bedfellows sometimes come together.

00:59:46.000 That's absolutely true.

00:59:48.000 Alright, so that's 2017.

00:59:49.000 She was at Fox News.

00:59:50.000 Hungry.

00:59:51.000 2021 to current.

00:59:52.000 Yen Ping Chin filed a Privacy Act law.

00:59:55.000 I kid you not.

00:59:56.000 If I'm gonna lie, you can't tell anybody about it!

00:59:58.000 Lawsuit.

00:59:59.000 She filed a Privacy Act lawsuit against the FBI.

01:00:02.000 This is where Herridge was subpoenaed.

01:00:04.000 The journalist.

01:00:06.000 Tell us your sources.

01:00:06.000 Exactly.

01:00:07.000 You have to divulge this information.

01:00:09.000 She basically goes in and says, look, I'm not going to do this.

01:00:12.000 I have the First Amendment to protect me and I'm going to protect my sources.

01:00:14.000 This is what happens with journalism.

01:00:16.000 You have to allow us to be able to do that.

01:00:18.000 Think about that.

01:00:18.000 A journalist is having to give up their sources because of a lawsuit from a communist Chinese national.

01:00:25.000 The Department of Defense is continuing to send, I believe they sent $6 million to this university in some form or fashion, either tuition assistance or something else.

01:00:33.000 Really, really strange.

01:00:34.000 Again, you locate four miles away from the Pentagon.

01:00:36.000 Okay, fine.

01:00:37.000 But here's where it gets really strange.

01:00:40.000 Harrods can make that argument, right?

01:00:42.000 She should walk in the court.

01:00:43.000 It should be like Section 230.

01:00:45.000 You just say it and you walk right out, right?

01:00:47.000 She did.

01:00:48.000 She said it.

01:00:48.000 Judge Christopher Cooper denied Harrods.

01:00:51.000 Here's what he said.

01:00:52.000 Chen, the lady that filed the Privacy Act, the CCP lady, yeah.

01:00:56.000 Chen's need for the requested evidence overcomes Heritage's qualified First Amendment privilege in this case.

01:01:04.000 Her need for information on her privacy being violated on a lie that she told with some shady connections to the DoD That overcomes a First Amendment right of a journalist.

01:01:16.000 Now, this is absolutely terrifying.

01:01:18.000 So, Herridge, basically, she ended up being fired in February of this year, on February 13th from CBS.

01:01:25.000 Now, here's where it gets really scary.

01:01:27.000 CBS fired her and then seized all of her documents, all of her computers, all of her devices, every single thing, and did not give that stuff back for two weeks until being pressured by people to do it.

01:01:41.000 Also, by the way, all these computers, records, a lot of them included information on stories related to the Bidens that she was pursuing, so she can't get that back.

01:01:48.000 I don't know if- Personal stuff, too?

01:01:50.000 I would assume... All over records.

01:01:51.000 All over records.

01:01:52.000 So I would assume that, yeah, the confiscated documents, yeah.

01:01:54.000 Not just work phones.

01:01:55.000 Yep.

01:01:55.000 That's, like, there's personal things.

01:01:55.000 Oh, wow.

01:01:57.000 I have things on my phone that I don't want any of you guys to look at.

01:01:59.000 Yeah, I've seen your phone.

01:02:00.000 I didn't want to look at it.

01:02:01.000 Hey, dude, what?

01:02:02.000 Well, you gave it to me because you said, look at this.

01:02:04.000 Does it look infected?

01:02:05.000 And one of the things too, she was actually, uh, a lot of potentially source information, not just information that they gave her, but information about the sources was accessed by CBS.

01:02:05.000 I wanted to know.

01:02:16.000 And basically SAG and AFTRA, what is that?

01:02:18.000 That's a union.

01:02:19.000 Yeah.

01:02:20.000 They basically went after them and said, Hey, you have to give this back.

01:02:22.000 But they had it for two weeks.

01:02:23.000 Hey, we'll give you this back now after two weeks.

01:02:25.000 We've copied everything now.

01:02:26.000 We've dug through everything now.

01:02:28.000 Of course we'll give you your stuff back.

01:02:30.000 And in February, again, actually like five, six days ago on the 29th, she was held in contempt by that same U.S.

01:02:35.000 District Court judge and required to pay $800 per day.

01:02:40.000 And in the decision, Judge Cooper said this about the potential issues with his ruling.

01:02:44.000 Right?

01:02:45.000 Doubling down on what he ruled earlier.

01:02:46.000 in this circuit, the court resolved that Chen's need for the requested information

01:02:49.000 to vindicate her rights under the Privacy Act overcome Harrods qualified

01:02:52.000 First Amendment reporter's privilege in this case, right?

01:02:55.000 Doubling down on what he ruled earlier. Again, this lady, the CCP lady, has more 1.00

01:03:02.000 And it doesn't matter that she has free speech over here. 0.95

01:03:02.000 rights. 0.95

01:03:04.000 It doesn't matter that she's protecting her source over here.

01:03:05.000 It doesn't matter that journalism has acted like this and depended on this ability for decades, over a hundred.

01:03:11.000 It doesn't matter.

01:03:12.000 All of that goes out.

01:03:13.000 And you know what we said?

01:03:14.000 Hey, wouldn't that have a chilling effect?

01:03:15.000 Yeah.

01:03:16.000 Wouldn't that make it less likely for people to come forward with information, especially about the Bidens?

01:03:21.000 If this kind of person with this high of a profile can get pushed out?

01:03:24.000 Or blackmail.

01:03:24.000 Of course.

01:03:25.000 Yeah.

01:03:25.000 I think it would affect it.

01:03:26.000 And by the way, this happens culturally.

01:03:26.000 Yeah.

01:03:28.000 This is why we did the Clean Slate campaign.

01:03:30.000 We still have done it.

01:03:31.000 If you want to know, watch the show.

01:03:32.000 It's weekdays, 10 a.m.

01:03:33.000 Eastern, because the algorithm determines what content is permissible.

01:03:36.000 And so now you see people who at one point did investigative journalism, or at one point were actually broadcasting programs, and now it's just watch and reacts with bleeps.

01:03:43.000 Yeah.

01:03:43.000 Watch and react with bleeps.

01:03:46.000 Let's just watch something vanilla and let's get some clicks because they will not allow us to be seen.

01:03:51.000 Because they create new rules that actually circumvent the laws.

01:03:51.000 Why?

01:03:54.000 Yes.

01:03:55.000 That's a key issue here.

01:03:57.000 So culturally it happens and now you're seeing it happen judicially because of the cultural alternatives like Rumble and Act.

01:04:02.000 Yeah, and look, we'll go to Mug Club here in just a couple of minutes, but let me just say a couple of things here.

01:04:08.000 Listen to this response from the judge on the chilling effect.

01:04:10.000 Downplaying, yeah.

01:04:11.000 He was like, ah, it doesn't affect investigative journalism.

01:04:13.000 Exactly.

01:04:14.000 At a minimum, any marginal chilling effect has certainly not frozen the information pipeline.

01:04:19.000 Instances of journalism built on confidential sources remains legion.

01:04:24.000 Disagree.

01:04:25.000 Does it matter?

01:04:25.000 Hold on.

01:04:26.000 The chilling effect is yet future, sir.

01:04:29.000 It's not that your ruling hasn't had time to take effect because it really hasn't.

01:04:33.000 It's all about the process that it should never have even the possibility of taking effect and having a chilling effect on the market.

01:04:41.000 So let's just play this out.

01:04:43.000 I'm a judge somewhere else, and I go, huh, that sounds like a reasonable opinion.

01:04:46.000 I don't like what's being said by this reporter over here.

01:04:48.000 Boom, you have another case.

01:04:50.000 You have another case.

01:04:51.000 You have another case.

01:04:52.000 And it takes the Supreme Court a while.

01:04:53.000 It takes the states a while.

01:04:54.000 It takes Congress a while to go, this is not how we want journalism to function in the United States.

01:05:00.000 We've got to do something about it.

01:05:01.000 Doesn't matter.

01:05:02.000 The pipeline is then frozen. 1.00

01:05:04.000 You're an idiot, sir. 1.00

01:05:05.000 Like, you don't understand what you're doing. 1.00

01:05:07.000 Or, let's be clear, maybe you do.

01:05:09.000 Maybe you understand what you're doing, and people need to look into you a little bit and see kind of what things come crawling out from under the rock when we turn it over.

01:05:17.000 Yeah, you know what?

01:05:18.000 What's the name of this judge again?

01:05:19.000 Judge Cooper.

01:05:20.000 Mr. Cooper!

01:05:20.000 What's his first name?

01:05:21.000 I don't know, we gotta find Cooper.

01:05:23.000 I thought it was Judge.

01:05:24.000 Christopher Cooper!

01:05:25.000 I thought it was like Judge Reinhold, but that is his first name.

01:05:28.000 Hey, lwctipsatprotonmail.com.

01:05:30.000 Let's look into Judge Christopher Cooper.

01:05:32.000 Don't worry, we won't hand over our records.

01:05:35.000 Just his.

01:05:36.000 Exactly, right?

01:05:37.000 So that's a couple of things here, and I'm going to go into the rest of it behind Mud Club, but let me just say this really quickly.

01:05:43.000 Stephen's already said this.

01:05:45.000 This kind of thing won't happen here to our sources.

01:05:47.000 We go to great lengths to make sure that Stephen and I don't even know who our sources are, right?

01:05:52.000 So if they come knocking on our doors, Can't.

01:05:54.000 Right?

01:05:55.000 But here's the thing.

01:05:55.000 Even if they did, we're not giving them up.

01:05:57.000 Nope.

01:05:58.000 Not ever going to give them up.

01:05:59.000 And Katherine Harridge, I'm going to make a direct call to you.

01:06:01.000 When you're ready to tell your story, because right now what people are trying to do is silence you and act like you don't exist anymore.

01:06:06.000 And the information that you had isn't relevant anymore.

01:06:09.000 It's not a news story anymore.

01:06:10.000 You can't trust this person.

01:06:11.000 They're, they're, they're under arrest potentially in the future for not divulging this information.

01:06:16.000 Certainly having to pay $800 a day.

01:06:17.000 And you didn't even get your stuff back in time from CBS.

01:06:20.000 Who knows if they even gave you all of it.

01:06:21.000 Come talk to us.

01:06:22.000 We'd be happy to put you on air and let you speak your mind and make sure that people get to hear this story.

01:06:29.000 And we may not even agree on a lot of things, Catherine, but this thing we do.

01:06:33.000 You have a right to tell your story.

01:06:34.000 You have a right to speak. 1.00

01:06:35.000 You have a First Amendment right and it cannot be infringed by this idiot judge. 1.00

01:06:40.000 Very well said. 1.00

01:06:40.000 And we'll continue on Mug Club. 1.00

01:06:41.000 If you're watching on Rumble, click that button.

01:06:43.000 None of this happens without your support.

01:06:45.000 It's $89 annually.

01:06:46.000 Wonderful hand etched mug.

01:06:46.000 We're going to do another 45 minutes to an hour of show.

01:06:49.000 You get Nick DiPaolo every day.

01:06:50.000 You get Brian Callen.

01:06:51.000 You get the Hodge twins.

01:06:52.000 You get Alex Jones on Friday.

01:06:53.000 You get our Friday show.

01:06:54.000 You get all kinds.

01:06:55.000 And the investigative unit.

01:06:56.000 You can go Mugless.

01:06:57.000 Mugless for $9 a month.

01:06:59.000 But why would you want to forego the mug?

01:07:00.000 So anyways, thank you Rumble.

01:07:02.000 YouTube.

01:07:03.000 Are we still there today?

01:07:03.000 Yeah.

01:07:05.000 How many times did we hit the dump button?

01:07:06.000 Did we?

01:07:06.000 I don't know if we... Yeah, we definitely did with Mr. Piss-Face Review.

01:07:09.000 YouTube, Keith Olbermann off.

Louder with Crowder - March 05, 2024

Trump's Back: Supreme Court Triggers Leftist Media Meltdown!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript