A woman calls HR to complain about her boss, a man named Steven, and the rest is downhill from there. Plus, the latest on the Supreme Court s decision to strike down the Voting Rights Act, and more. Guests: Sam, an HR coordinator at a company that doesn t like Sam, a woman who doesn't like her manager, and Catherine Herridge, an investigative journalist who had her First Amendment rights infringed upon.
00:01:43.000Steven actually subjects me to constant teasing, ridicule, humiliation, and just I feel he has a complete lack of respect for not only me, but the entire HR community.
00:02:39.000No one, and I mean no one, loves a crybaby.
00:02:44.000Join Mug Club today for $89 annually or try it Mugless for $9 a month.
00:02:57.000You can sign up at ladderwithcredit.com slash Mug Club for the entire catalog including Nick DiPaolo, Brian Callen, the Hodgetwins, Mr. Guns and Gear, and of course Alex Jones along with 100% more of this show.
00:05:01.000And it's exacerbated by the fact that, you can bring that back up Toolman, that the most recent New York Times poll shows really bad news for former Vice President Joe Biden.
00:05:25.000And something in a Gerald Knows Stuff segment, Catherine Herridge, this is an investigative journalist who just had her First Amendment rights infringed upon.
00:06:42.000Before we move on to third chair, think about this with Donald Trump.
00:06:44.000We're going to talk about the black vote today and how there is a startling switch to Donald Trump versus President Joe Biden in comparison, you know, historically.
00:06:55.000The left thinks that they are going to harm Donald Trump with the black voting base by shouting from the rooftops that he sleeps with models and he has a mug shot.
00:09:34.000And he just right here, I'm going to show you the full clip.
00:09:38.000It's textbook talking points that they use to try and put pro-life conservatives on the back foot.
00:09:45.000Don't allow yourself to be caught flat-footed with this.
00:09:48.000It is lazy, it's something that we have addressed time and time again, but it's the same tired tropes that are trotted out and they think, yeah, like, on a social media algorithm.
00:09:58.000Watch it and see if you can spot everything wrong.
00:10:06.000When I listen to Republicans talk about being pro-life, what I want to know is, where are their pro-life stances when it comes to Head Start?
00:10:13.000Where are their pro-life stances when it comes to prenatal care?
00:10:17.000Where are their pro-life stances when you have black women who have a high rate of dying in childbirth?
00:10:22.000Where are your pro-life policies when it comes to black, when it comes to infant mortality?
00:10:27.000Okay, so one thing, I don't really want to have to go through all the details on why it's factually incorrect, but I will.
00:10:33.000The macro point here is they try and tell you that you cannot be pro-life if you don't believe in murdering a baby.
00:10:42.000A baby, a new life that has completely separate DNA from both the mother and the father that determines everything about that child.
00:10:47.000Height, eye color, male pattern baldness, what their hopes, dreams are, their temperament, all that is determined by their DNA.
00:10:53.000And it's now separate from the mother and father.
00:10:55.000You cannot be pro-life unless, and this is what they do, insert every taxpayer funded program wish list here.
00:11:02.000If you don't support all of those, then you're not pro-life.
00:11:34.000When I listen to Republicans talk about being pro-life, what I want to know is, where are their pro-life stances when it comes to Head Start?
00:12:07.000And at what point does personal accountability come into play?
00:12:09.000Again, we're right back to the idea that if I don't give you my money at gunpoint, I'm somehow not pro-life, assuming the results are what you believe them to be.
00:13:05.000Infant mortality is not compared with the same standards across different countries.
00:13:09.000So in the United States, we actually consider it infant mortality because we actually measure that in the data as a life, whereas in other countries, they wouldn't.
00:13:16.000They would just say, it's a terminated pregnancy.
00:14:05.000And I'm like, I think that's an interesting date.
00:14:08.000Where did those slaves happen to come from?
00:14:11.000Maybe you should wear a pin that's like, hey, you guys have been selling your fellow brothers into slavery for hundreds and hundreds of years prior to the Americans at the time bringing people over.
00:14:20.000Maybe you should go to the root of the problem.
00:14:22.000I'm not saying that we had an easy time there.
00:14:24.000I'm just saying, You're focusing on the wrong enemy.
00:14:26.000According to Cornel West, it's at least 95% of slaves were actually sold into slavery as opposed to being kidnapped.
00:14:31.000And by the way, more slaves today than ever in recorded history.
00:14:34.000Over 40 million slaves on Earth today.
00:15:41.000And the ruling basically stated that individual states could not, in fact, bar presidential candidates from a ballot because this is a national issue.
00:15:51.000In case you've forgotten, here's a refresher, then we'll get to the media meltdown.
00:16:00.000A really consequential decision has just been handed down.
00:16:02.000Paula Reid, the court has made a decision.
00:16:04.000This is a win for former President Trump.
00:16:06.000Here, the Supreme Court has reversed a ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court that would have removed former President Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the so-called insurrectionist ban.
00:16:19.000Now this is very much what we expected based on what we saw about a month ago during oral argument.
00:16:24.000Justices on both sides of the aisle appeared skeptical of Colorado's argument that Trump could be removed by the state under the 14th amendment.
00:17:09.000So, according to the court, they said, we conclude that states may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office, but states have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency.
00:17:23.000And here's the thing, they'll try and do this word play, where they'll say, you know, insurrection, insurrectionist, not convicted.
00:17:54.000So Donald Trump responded, President Trump, some people call him former president, some people call him sitting president, I call him sitting president, praising the decision and of course he was going in hard on former Vice President Biden for weaponizing the justice system, which I actually think was a good angle for him to take.
00:18:11.000I want to start by thanking the Supreme Court for its unanimous decision today.
00:18:21.000And I think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together, which our country needs.
00:18:28.000And they worked long, they worked hard, and frankly, they worked very quickly on something that will be spoken about 100 years from now and 200 years from now.
00:19:53.000I think he looks better, and I get it, this doesn't really matter, but compare that to Barack Obama, the side-by-side, like how the presidency ages people.
00:20:01.000And of course, former Vice President Biden.
00:20:32.000And there's something to be said for that.
00:20:35.000I'm surprised when we did the side-by-side because when you said, like, hey, compare Obama, I was like, yeah, this office ages people in ways that just look like they're going to end their lives essentially by the time they get out of the office.
00:22:00.000You think we're gonna... There are people who are... I've heard of people who are out of touch with black American culture, but this is ridiculous.
00:26:31.000So this is what he first X'd out, I guess.
00:26:33.000He said, The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy.
00:26:36.000Its members, including Jackson, Kagan, and Sotomayor, have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension, and collectively, the court has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate.
00:30:32.000Whereas back then they were gloating that the Colorado court obviously ruled in a way that was unconstitutional.
00:30:38.000I hope the justices see through his lies and underline that it is within state authority to keep off oath-breaking insurrectionists from our ballot.
00:32:12.000Was he raised with an expression that he didn't understand?
00:32:15.000You know, maybe he doesn't get the whole pissing, like, which one is the bad part, whether it's on you- Who got their dick caught in the cookie jar?
00:33:04.000After he was fired from MSNBC, I used to host the CPAC Ballroom, and I went out as Keith Olbermann, looking for work, like, trying to get a contract with Maybelline, and it actually made it into the news, like, Keith Olbermann is a surprise guest speaker at CPAC.
00:34:29.000That's the value of Donald Trump as a bull in a China shop, because there's a disconnect between the swamp, the elites, and you.
00:34:35.000No one out there, you watching right now, can you imagine when you're razzing any of your friends, just one of them saying, yes, it's urine on my face.
00:34:46.000And you would be known as piss face forever.
00:34:48.000And you letting them get away with it?
00:35:45.000What I mean is these are the liberal justices having to justify their opinion or explain it.
00:35:52.000No, showing your work, like Long Division.
00:35:53.000They said, the contrary conclusion that a handful of officials in a few states could decide the nation's next president would be especially surprising with respect to Section 3.
00:36:03.000The Reconstruction arguments were specifically designed as an expansion of federal power and an intrusion on state sovereignty.
00:36:09.000Section 3 marks the first time the Constitution placed substantive limits on a state's authority to choose its own officials.
00:36:18.000Given that context, it would defy logic for Section 3 to give states new powers, keyword being new powers, to determine who may hold the presidency.
00:36:28.000This is basically what they're saying.
00:36:30.000a small, relatively, court in Colorado doesn't get to determine the presidency for the rest of the country.
00:36:39.000Because this, by the way, this is the three of the liberal justices getting together to write
00:36:44.000this opinion. So it's not any one of them. It's all three of them agreeing with this and saying,
00:36:48.000look, the absolute most clear thing that the United States government was doing was intruding
00:36:55.000on states' rights in this case to make sure that they had less power to determine this kind of
00:37:00.000Because of those insurrectionists essentially at the time just sending representatives back to Congress and saying, hey, nothing happened, we're all good, right?
00:37:07.000We're just going to change things from the inside.
00:37:08.000They're like, no, no, no, you can't do that.
00:37:10.000For Colorado to then think that that gives them new authority Is one of the stupidest things that I've ever seen in our legal system, and we have Kyle Rittenhouse to look at.
00:37:20.000Yeah, well this is also the reason that the left hates the Electoral College.
00:37:23.000Again, that was designed as a system of checks and balances to ensure that, especially in a new country where people are moving, they're migrating west, that New York City doesn't determine The representatives for the entire country.
00:37:34.000That's the reason for the Electoral College.
00:37:36.000Now you may disagree with it, you may say now that you think it's irrelevant or that there's a problem if the popular vote has some kind of discrepancy with the Electoral College vote, I still believe that it's necessary, but these people don't believe that there should be any checks and balances.
00:37:51.000And let's just, while they're talking about constitutionality or this court overreaching, Here's the thing, this is, and you need to understand, I've always said don't attribute to malice what can be chalked up to incompetence, right?
00:38:09.000This is a group, and when I say group, I mean today's progressive left, and by the way, the entire DNC, and the media, entertainment, industrial establishment, they have knowingly violated the Constitution.
00:38:23.000So when you have the CDC eviction moratorium, right, which is effectively rent forgiveness, where no, no, you can't evict someone who hasn't paid rent, which of course put many mom and pop home providers out of business forever because they didn't get any kind of forgiveness.
00:38:34.000You had this president and you had these, of course, the Supreme Court eventually said, you can't do that.
00:38:43.000Joe Biden literally acknowledged that this is probably unconstitutional and will be ruled against by the courts, but it'll give us a few months.
00:38:49.000Think about federally mandating vaccines.
00:38:51.000For government employees, of course they would have, they wanted to do it for everybody.
00:38:55.000Now, taking President Trump off of the ballots because of a court in Colorado, they knowingly violate the Constitution.
00:39:00.000They don't care about the Constitution.
00:39:02.000And I'm not just falsely attributing motive here.
00:39:15.000You enact a policy that you know is going to fail eventually, but you can destroy as much of the fabric of this country in the meantime as you possibly can, and face no consequences.
00:39:29.000Do what you can get away with for as long as you can.
00:39:30.000So I guess the question is, to conservatives, if you could act like a Democrat for a day, what's the one policy that you would make a reality?
00:39:37.000I know, if you were actually a fascist, like the left.
00:41:22.000Because they know if he's a nominee, he very likely wins.
00:41:25.000And so once they get through that phase, if it doesn't work, and we all have a lot of work to do, right? It could go
00:41:30.000either way. They're going to go after you. The last choice for a politician is to go after the
00:41:34.000voter base. They try and separate you from, you know, the quote-unquote generals and say, it's
00:41:40.000not you, it's Trump. That's why Hillary Clinton got into so much trouble with basket of deplorables.
00:41:45.000That was her ultimate downfall because she attacked the voters.
00:41:48.000They will do it, though, if they can't actually get Donald Trump.
00:41:51.000Now, the reason they're so scared is because the latest New York Times poll, it came out a couple days ago, but I believe they released some final numbers yesterday or today.
00:42:00.000Horrible news for former Vice President Joe Biden.
00:42:02.000So in a national election, a general, Trump beats him 48 to 43.
00:42:07.000Forty-eight to forty-three, but I want to get into some other numbers here because people look at that, they go, oh, it kind of oscillates.
00:42:12.000But again, if you look historically in 2016 and you look historically at 2020, Donald Trump tends to actually, well, he was always losing at this point in time, and then he would close the gap.
00:42:23.000He hasn't been at this, and certainly not from the New York Times polls.
00:42:28.000Uh, and I do think there's a huge, historically it's true, uh, it wasn't as big in 2020, there's a huge contingency of secret voters, especially now as you relate it to the border wall immigration issue.
00:42:37.000You can, you can kind of look at, uh, you can feel how the winds are blowing, but here's some, here's some demographics that are very interesting.
00:42:43.000White voters, Donald Trump beats Biden 53 to 40.
00:43:20.000And I don't think he's, I don't think, you guys can let me know, I don't think a Republican nationally has won the Hispanic vote.
00:43:25.000We've talked about in Florida, obviously, we have a lot of Cuban Americans, they tend to be the most conservative voting bloc in America, outside of actually, funny enough, Millennials and Gen Z Cuban Americans are becoming more conservative again.
00:43:36.000But outside of that, I don't think anyone, any Republican, you can let me know in chat or comment if I'm speaking out of turn, I don't think they've Actually won the Hispanic vote.
00:43:44.000They've mitigated losses, but let me give you some interesting numbers here, because you look at that general, you say, okay, that's pretty close.
00:43:50.000Sure, but let's apply that same logic when we're talking about, for example, the Hispanic vote.
00:43:54.000Where would there be a significant state where that might change the outcome of the election?
00:43:59.000Before you even get to election shenanigans, before you even get to social media throttling the Hunter Biden story, just looking at these demographics, Arizona in 2020, assuming that you believe what you've been told, President Trump lost by 10,500 votes, give or take.
00:44:16.000The Arizona Hispanic voting population is 1.9 million people.
00:44:21.000So in 2020, Donald Trump got 37% of the Hispanic vote.
00:44:26.000So if you were to apply 46%, and again, I get that this is hypothetical, but it is significant, if President Trump were to hold these numbers, 46% of that vote, he gets 107,000 more votes than in 2020.
00:47:00.000You can't have it, you can't say it's a cult of personality and then say don't vote for him because of personality.
00:47:04.000When it comes to policies, time after time, I don't know that there's ever been a poll to the opposite effect.
00:47:08.000When it comes to policies, you actually have to look past kind of the bombastic nature of Donald Trump because his policies were so much more effective and you see the numbers.
00:47:19.000So I think that Donald Trump focusing on that, as he did in his statement, discussing, you know, the justice system, discussing the border, staying on that issue.
00:47:25.000People would have told him it was a losing issue in 2016.
00:47:28.000Ah, the border issue, they'll say you're racist.
00:47:50.000By the way, there's an expletive in the next overlay, so they won't bring it up, but you can just mute, you can kind of censor it if you want.
00:47:55.000So the article quoted CUNY professor Suni, I don't know if that's how they pronounce it, a professor, Jeff Jarvis, who posted this on his Threads account, and he said, the effing times, it follows up yesterday's awful poll with another.
00:48:13.000That they even asked this question is evidence of the bias, the agenda, in their poll.
00:49:37.000So how bad does it have to be, this is another question for you, how bad does it have to be for Joseph Biden when not even the New York Times can carry his water and CNN contributors, I don't know what the term is for this guy, they have to go out and say, I can't believe that the New York Times is not doing the bidding.
00:49:53.000for Joe Biden. They really, really... this guy really, really needs to be dragged across the
00:49:57.000finish line by the media. And I hope that doesn't happen because they did that last time by punting
00:50:02.000the Hunter Biden story, by suppressing all of the information that we really should have known about
00:50:06.000the Biden family, by falsely maligning Donald Trump as an insurrectionist who peacefully handed over
00:50:11.000the reins of power. So they had to last time drag him across the finish line.
00:50:16.000I think they're a little bit scared to.
00:50:18.000If only, yes, they're ideologically motivated, but if only out of their own self-interest.
00:52:31.000District Court judge held this journalist—oh, well, no, by the way, a veteran journalist who's been doing this for a while, Catherine Herridge—in contempt.
00:52:39.000And this is scary for anyone out there who believes in investigative journalism or believes that it's important as it relates to our constitutional republic.
00:52:50.000For refusing to reveal confidential sources.
00:52:53.000A federal judge holding journalist Katherine Harridge in civil contempt for refusing to reveal her sources in a series of Fox News reports from 2017.
00:53:01.000She's also facing a fine of $800 a day.
00:53:54.000Alright, so look, this ruling actually comes, like I said, with a little bit of, I don't know, questionable timing.
00:53:59.000Just weeks after she was, I'm sorry, just weeks after this ruling, she was fired by CBS, and she was working on multiple stories right now about Hunter Biden's involvement with, you know, Joe Biden, the big guy, and all the stuff that they were dealing with, Burisma, and all of that, that he's been testifying in front of Congress for recently.
00:54:15.000Surprise, surprise, they got rid of her, but she's being targeted When she's reporting on an issue that might affect the government, right?
00:54:21.000And this has happened before, obviously with Project Veritas when they had the Ashley Biden diary issue.
00:54:25.000They didn't even actually run that story.
00:54:27.000It got leaked out and it didn't really go viral, but all of a sudden the FBI shows up and, give us that fake diary!
00:55:23.000Journalists go and they do their job, and then the government finds a way To come in and go, you know what, we don't like what you're doing.
00:55:30.000That's what it seems like at the very least.
00:55:37.000That was the one takeaway that people didn't like, and of course I don't trust Putin any further than I can throw him, but when Tucker interviewed him he was saying, you don't think your government does this?
00:55:44.000You don't think your government prosecutes journalists?
00:55:46.000You don't think your government uses the system?
00:55:47.000And you know what, that's one area where he had a point.
00:55:49.000This doesn't feel like the United States of America.
00:55:50.000And one thing to keep in mind, altruistic journalists only exist in the movies, you
00:55:56.000know, or some like where it's Erin Brockovich because there's some kind of contaminated
00:56:19.000Before we get into the selective prosecution here, single party consent means that you are well within the bounds of the law to record a conversation without the other party knowing.
00:57:15.000And in the case of YouTube doing that Hunter Biden laptop on X and then I don't know if you remember we were doing a live stream and Facebook took us down back way back when we were doing Facebook stuff and they're like, oh yeah, I don't know.
00:57:25.000They issued a copyright strike for it and they're like, yeah, but we weren't.
00:57:44.000Now, it's the exact same thing that the Democrats do.
00:57:46.000They do something, they know it's illegal, but the courts are going to take a little bit of time to get to it, so it has the same effect.
00:57:51.000No apologies ever given, no reason why.
00:57:53.000And you'll see more of the abuse of the courts.
00:57:55.000The point that I'm making is because now with X being purchased by Musk, now with Rumble being an alternative to YouTube, they're going, okay, We don't have a stranglehold on information, so now let's actually prosecute and jail or hold in contempt investigative journalists.
00:58:07.000Let's make sure we send a shockwave of fear so that everyone else out there knows better.
00:58:12.000By the way, you can send your stories to LWCTipsAtProtonMail.com.
00:59:04.000When asked if she had ties, like, to any foreign governments or ever served in the military, she's like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, just the People's Liberation Army.
01:00:18.000A journalist is having to give up their sources because of a lawsuit from a communist Chinese national.
01:00:25.000The Department of Defense is continuing to send, I believe they sent $6 million to this university in some form or fashion, either tuition assistance or something else.
01:00:52.000Chen, the lady that filed the Privacy Act, the CCP lady, yeah.
01:00:56.000Chen's need for the requested evidence overcomes Heritage's qualified First Amendment privilege in this case.
01:01:04.000Her need for information on her privacy being violated on a lie that she told with some shady connections to the DoD That overcomes a First Amendment right of a journalist.
01:01:18.000So, Herridge, basically, she ended up being fired in February of this year, on February 13th from CBS.
01:01:25.000Now, here's where it gets really scary.
01:01:27.000CBS fired her and then seized all of her documents, all of her computers, all of her devices, every single thing, and did not give that stuff back for two weeks until being pressured by people to do it.
01:01:41.000Also, by the way, all these computers, records, a lot of them included information on stories related to the Bidens that she was pursuing, so she can't get that back.
01:02:05.000And one of the things too, she was actually, uh, a lot of potentially source information, not just information that they gave her, but information about the sources was accessed by CBS.
01:03:33.000Eastern, because the algorithm determines what content is permissible.
01:03:36.000And so now you see people who at one point did investigative journalism, or at one point were actually broadcasting programs, and now it's just watch and reacts with bleeps.
01:05:09.000Maybe you understand what you're doing, and people need to look into you a little bit and see kind of what things come crawling out from under the rock when we turn it over.