Louder with Crowder - December 02, 2025


🔴War Criminal Pete Hegseth: Debunking the Media's Newest BS Smear Campaign 2025-12-02 18:20


Episode Stats


Length

41 minutes

Words per minute

189.624

Word count

7,901

Sentence count

700

Harmful content

Misogyny

27

sentences flagged

Hate speech

32

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, the guys discuss the latest poll that shows a solid majority of Hispanic and African-American voters voted for Donald Trump in 2016. They also discuss why the new Republican candidate for president, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is a racist and why she should be kicked out of the race.

Transcript

Transcripts from "Louder with Crowder" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Have been on board with what has traditionally been seen as not only conservatism, but patriotism.
00:00:06.000 So reshape the GOP to match what's actually seemingly a pretty small contingency to match what?
00:00:14.000 We would just look like the Democrat Party at that point.
00:00:16.000 Yeah.
00:00:17.000 No.
00:00:18.000 So this is something where the media, what they're telling, and even then, these people who still break with a lot of you watching on a lot of issues, they still overwhelmingly support Donald Trump's job performance.
00:00:29.000 Think about that for a second.
00:00:30.000 Because you've been told that the strike in Iran, now people, they would rather impeach Donald Trump.
00:00:35.000 They regret voting for him.
00:00:36.000 Buyer's remorse.
00:00:37.000 Right.
00:00:37.000 Yeah.
00:00:37.000 Or certainly Hispanic black voters.
00:00:39.000 I didn't even get into those demographics.
00:00:40.000 They're actually some of the strongest supporters of Donald Trump.
00:00:42.000 Which is interesting because this poll, you mentioned previously that it was an oversample of black and Hispanic voters.
00:00:48.000 Right.
00:00:49.000 And that question, I am a racist, 32%, there's zero chance there's no bleedover.
00:00:54.000 Yeah.
00:00:54.000 Right.
00:00:55.000 Well, I guarantee you Hispanics answer honestly, it's 100% racist. 0.99
00:00:59.000 100% are racist.
00:01:00.000 That's what I'm saying, dude.
00:01:01.000 There's some, there's definitely, they make, when they had that question, I am a racist, they make it, because we've done this thing with media and the left where if you're racist, you're white.
00:01:11.000 Right.
00:01:11.000 Right.
00:01:11.000 You can't be racist or anything else.
00:01:13.000 Hispanic's an exception. 1.00
00:01:14.000 They love to call them white.
00:01:16.000 Right.
00:01:17.000 Well, for some reason, are classified as whites.
00:01:19.000 I don't know what that is, but they don't include them.
00:01:20.000 Well, my lady, my woman, you know that pejorative term, she's not really Hispanic. 1.00
00:01:27.000 She would be considered because she speaks Spanish and Portuguese.
00:01:29.000 She's Brazilian American. 0.87
00:01:30.000 She's American.
00:01:31.000 She became a citizen, was raised here.
00:01:34.000 She's racist, I realized, against every single group except white men. 1.00
00:01:39.000 I realized that the other day.
00:01:40.000 I said maybe she fears you.
00:01:41.000 I said, well, yeah, yeah.
00:01:43.000 And she should.
00:01:44.000 I keep my pin pants strong.
00:01:47.000 No, I realize she'll be like, oh, that's such a Hispanic man thing. 1.00
00:01:50.000 She'll be like, oh, the machismo and looking, you know, and they're doing that and wearing the shirt button down. 1.00
00:01:53.000 She'll be like, oh, yeah, that's all the women in Miami look at fake, fake diss and fake lips. 1.00
00:01:56.000 And she'll be talking about it.
00:01:57.000 She'll go like, oh, that's such a white woman thing. 1.00
00:01:59.000 Oh, well, can we express our feelings?
00:02:01.000 And she has a perfect white person voice. 0.98
00:02:03.000 I mean, don't even get me started on black Americans and Asian Americans.
00:02:07.000 She has no chip in her brain for some of the cultural norms.
00:02:12.000 But basically, against everyone but white men.
00:02:14.000 And that's honestly pretty typical.
00:02:16.000 It's pretty typical.
00:02:18.000 Hispanic people versus other Hispanic people. 0.99
00:02:20.000 Oh, my God.
00:02:22.000 So, yeah, this is something that we need to take into context.
00:02:25.000 I think you need to take all information available to you.
00:02:28.000 But people have made it seem like it's a civil war.
00:02:30.000 And so the new Republican Party is going to be, it's going to be what?
00:02:33.000 It's going to be, it's going to be Mamdani. 1.00
00:02:36.000 I mean, honestly, if you look at like what, Mamdani, Bernie, AOC, people who are socially liberal but want to divest from Israel. 0.54
00:02:45.000 How about the solution moving forward?
00:02:49.000 I think this is a very fair, fair compromise.
00:02:52.000 We should be conservative across the board, which, by the way, is one and the same with America First, meaning place the needs of Americans, our citizens, above all others, America first, okay?
00:03:04.000 Socially conservative because that puts America first.
00:03:07.000 That means we don't do the LGBTQAIP with kids, all that stuff.
00:03:10.000 You want to keep it in your bedroom, okay, fine, but we're not going to do this.
00:03:12.000 This is not going to be our society.
00:03:13.000 We are going to be fiscally conservative because a lot of the social safety net programs have proven to be an abysmal failure.
00:03:21.000 We, of course, are going to be strong on immigration.
00:03:24.000 And because it's not inconsistent with our values at all, we're just going to limit foreign funding, foreign aid, foreign involvement as far as even assisting militaries, unless it benefits us.
00:03:34.000 So that would mean Israel, hey, there are probably plenty of wealthy Jews who could make up the gap for that $3 billion a year. 0.96
00:03:41.000 You have the right to act in your own self-interest with no intervention from us.
00:03:45.000 We get it, but that also means no money from us.
00:03:47.000 I think that is a viable path forward.
00:03:50.000 And I think it's one that's pretty hard to argue with from Jews themselves or from people who think that Israel is the root cause of everything or Jews are the root cause of everything.
00:04:01.000 That point, hey, we don't have a dog in that fight because we're focusing on America, but we're also not going to reshape the conservative movement to meet modern socialists who want cheaper housing prices.
00:04:12.000 We should do that too.
00:04:14.000 But that shouldn't be the only thing that we base our fundamental values on.
00:04:19.000 Yeah.
00:04:19.000 No, I 100% agree.
00:04:20.000 And I think right now that a lot of people are focusing on the conversations that are happening and not the actual changing of beliefs.
00:04:26.000 There's a lot of conversations happening around these different topics.
00:04:30.000 And in some cases, that does lead to change, but they're looking at the conversations thinking that's the end of it.
00:04:34.000 It's not.
00:04:35.000 You want to keep this coalition together, show the younger people a future that is attainable and desirable and give them a roadmap to get there.
00:04:44.000 And most of this coalition stays completely together and probably adds a lot of people to it.
00:04:48.000 Show people a future that they can't attain and there's no plan to get there.
00:04:52.000 And they start going, well, at least socialism gives me stuff.
00:04:55.000 Right.
00:04:56.000 That is the game right now.
00:04:58.000 That is why Zorhan Mamdani is mayor of New York, period.
00:05:01.000 There may be other ancillary issues that are affecting it, but that is the crux of it.
00:05:06.000 And when people feel like they cannot make it, they can't get a job, they can't do anything that's going to lead to a better life, they start giving up.
00:05:13.000 They start not having kids.
00:05:14.000 They start not participating and they start making really bad decisions.
00:05:17.000 Because at least tomorrow is secure if you're taking the billionaire's money and giving it to me for food.
00:05:22.000 Well, let me give you a couple of examples here where people go, let's say, and this is a legitimate gripe.
00:05:26.000 Young people saying housing prices have ballooned.
00:05:29.000 They're unaffordable.
00:05:30.000 Now, there's a little of column A, there's a little of column B, meaning this is by design.
00:05:35.000 You've been forced out of the market.
00:05:37.000 There have been a lot of policies that have been abysmal for young Americans.
00:05:40.000 And there are also some more options made available to you than the nihilists will let you, will lead you on to believe.
00:05:46.000 You can live further outside of the city.
00:05:49.000 There are certain niceties that you can forego.
00:05:52.000 There are trade schools available where you can make a good income right now and not worry about your job being given to someone else, at least in the near future.
00:05:59.000 So that part needs to be included in the conversation.
00:06:02.000 But let's look at people saying, hey, it's really hard for us out there, younger Americans.
00:06:07.000 Yeah, I get that.
00:06:09.000 All right.
00:06:09.000 So what's causing that?
00:06:10.000 And then they'll go, yeah, you know, DEI outlawing DEI.
00:06:16.000 No.
00:06:17.000 Right.
00:06:18.000 New GOP is only, what was it, make?
00:06:21.000 It was 45%.
00:06:22.000 Okay.
00:06:22.000 Well, hold on a second.
00:06:23.000 Let's ask, what do you think has contributed to ballooning housing prices?
00:06:28.000 Are you aware of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac?
00:06:32.000 Aware of subprime loans?
00:06:34.000 They used to call it predatory lending.
00:06:35.000 That was DEI.
00:06:37.000 That was make sure that poor minorities can get into homes with no money down and incredibly low interest in the name of equity, right? 1.00
00:06:45.000 That completely altered the market.
00:06:46.000 Hey, then you talk about deporting illegals.
00:06:49.000 Older people who say yes, and older people in this case means over the age of 30.
00:06:53.000 Well, yeah.
00:06:54.000 Hey, what do you think happens to the housing market when you have people who work off the books?
00:06:58.000 When you have 20 million people over the course of four years, when you have 53 million people who, by the way, can get favorable terms in some cases on loans, and there's far more demand for houses than supply.
00:07:09.000 What do you think would happen tomorrow if we did away with 50 million illegal aliens? 1.00
00:07:13.000 How many homes do you think would be available?
00:07:14.000 What if we made sure that people who had no business being in those homes who couldn't afford it didn't get those homes and become foreclosed upon?
00:07:22.000 You'd have a lot more homes available, and they'd be a lot more competitive to provide homes with people who actually can afford it and have money down.
00:07:30.000 And if people need to have money down, if that's still a requirement, guess what?
00:07:33.000 That home better be within the realm of affordability.
00:07:36.000 So if you actually look at these issues, you say centralized economics, we also see from a lot of young people, right?
00:07:42.000 Like I voted for Trump, but I'm okay with more big government spending.
00:07:47.000 Okay.
00:07:48.000 Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, massive importation of third worlders. 1.00
00:07:52.000 And then what happened when all of this orchestrated, you know, this collapse, that's what it was.
00:07:58.000 It was an orchestrated collapse.
00:08:00.000 What happened?
00:08:00.000 We bailed them out.
00:08:02.000 Who was opposing that?
00:08:03.000 You guys remember the Tea Party?
00:08:07.000 And by the way, don't just say, okay, boomer.
00:08:08.000 There are plenty of people who are in their early 30s who watched that.
00:08:11.000 The Rick Santelli rant, right?
00:08:13.000 We were opposed to the bailouts then.
00:08:16.000 So horrible government policy in the name of DEI, in the name of making homes affordable to people coming to this country, legal or not, it collapsed.
00:08:25.000 And then, by the way, we're also going to bail out these big banks because they're too big to fail, which is more socialism.
00:08:30.000 You think more of that will improve it?
00:08:33.000 Keep in mind that one wing, the Democrat wing, wants an entire generation of renters who will own nothing. 0.50
00:08:39.000 Yeah.
00:08:40.000 So the communication hasn't been very effective.
00:08:42.000 No.
00:08:43.000 And the left goes, I'm going to give it to you.
00:08:45.000 I'm going to make housing affordable.
00:08:46.000 How?
00:08:48.000 Mandate.
00:08:49.000 Didn't you kind of try to do that nationally?
00:08:52.000 Didn't you force banks to?
00:08:54.000 And by the way, like health insurance, if banks have to give these home loans to people who won't pay them back, well, why would they, oh, it's backed, it's guaranteed by the government.
00:09:05.000 So no price is too high, right?
00:09:08.000 They'll make up the difference.
00:09:09.000 The communication has been bad.
00:09:11.000 This isn't a MU principles.
00:09:12.000 You can actually look at the results that can be quantified from Democrat policies on immigration, with housing, by the way, and with schooling, on DEI and equity, with housing, by the way, and with schooling, on centralized economic planning.
00:09:31.000 TARP bailing out the banks by design.
00:09:34.000 Same thing with, hey, how's your health insurance?
00:09:38.000 Is it unaffordable?
00:09:39.000 I agree with you.
00:09:40.000 Why do you think that is?
00:09:41.000 When did they start skyrocketing?
00:09:43.000 Something, something Obamacare to make health insurance more affordable and accessible to young people who made up a huge portion of those who didn't have insurance pre-Affordable Care Act.
00:09:57.000 Hey, how do you like air travel?
00:09:59.000 Young Americans.
00:10:00.000 It's all right.
00:10:03.000 Have they been bailed out repeatedly?
00:10:05.000 Is that a heavily regulated industry?
00:10:08.000 So the communication hasn't been all that good.
00:10:09.000 And people suggesting that the overcorrection is to meet Mamdani or Bernie halfway so that our party is morphed into that, yeah, it's okay to transit kids.
00:10:17.000 Yeah, it's okay to not deport people.
00:10:20.000 Yeah, I guess DEI isn't all that bad.
00:10:22.000 Well, then you end up with nothing.
00:10:23.000 Then you end up with an actual uniparty.
00:10:25.000 And that's what the left wants, by the way.
00:10:27.000 We kind of have gotten there.
00:10:28.000 When people say uniparty, I go, yeah, yeah, the right has gone left and the left has gone far left.
00:10:32.000 Seems like the suggestion here would be more of that.
00:10:35.000 That's where I disagree.
00:10:37.000 Yeah, 100%.
00:10:38.000 And I do think that Trump needs better messaging on the affordability issue because at this, you know, he's been kind of looking at this right now.
00:10:45.000 He's having his cabinet meeting that's being broadcast.
00:10:48.000 And he said the affordability crisis is a con job by the left.
00:10:52.000 Yeah, that's not good.
00:10:53.000 I understand what he's, you know, we do give him some grace sometimes.
00:10:56.000 It's bad messaging, period.
00:10:57.000 Let me start out with that.
00:10:58.000 But I understand what he's trying to say.
00:10:59.000 It's like, hey, they're trying to make it sound like it's way worse than it is.
00:11:02.000 I understand that, but that's not what people want to hear right now.
00:11:05.000 Mamdani didn't get elected because it was a con job by the left. 0.67
00:11:08.000 It's because people went out and tried to buy a house.
00:11:10.000 They went to the grocery store.
00:11:12.000 They went to buy a car.
00:11:12.000 They went to try to get a job.
00:11:14.000 They tried to get into their top five universities and ended up at number six.
00:11:19.000 Yeah.
00:11:19.000 Because there's so many foreign students come in.
00:11:21.000 They saw H-1Bs come in and you want to uncapp this. 0.90
00:11:23.000 And they competed in a job market flooded with illegal aliens that depresses wages across the board. 1.00
00:11:29.000 So you've got to address that.
00:11:31.000 And you really have to go, listen, like there is an element of toughen up a little bit, but that's not the main thing.
00:11:36.000 The main thing is there is a massive problem.
00:11:39.000 The only way to get through it is to toughen up a little bit.
00:11:42.000 And we have to work on these policies that have led you to this place.
00:11:46.000 Here's what I would do if I was him, if I was advising him.
00:11:48.000 I would go, look, you don't want to be Barack Obama who blamed his horrible presidency, all of his ills on George W.
00:11:54.000 Yeah, for sure.
00:11:55.000 Okay.
00:11:55.000 And then so did Biden.
00:11:57.000 But you had a rip-roaring economy under Trump term one until we got to COVID.
00:12:02.000 The inflation, the skyrocketing inflation, didn't really transpire until Biden's presidency, and it continued to get worse.
00:12:10.000 Donald Trump should say, look, I get it.
00:12:15.000 We've had one year to deal with what was a fundamental altering of the economy.
00:12:21.000 And it's not enough.
00:12:22.000 It's going to take a little bit of time to see these results.
00:12:24.000 We are working on it, but one year isn't enough to reverse course with what was the most catastrophic economic decisions that were made by the previous administration.
00:12:35.000 But we hear you, and we're working on it.
00:12:37.000 We'd like to make it happen faster.
00:12:38.000 And then tout some of the wins.
00:12:40.000 Say, here's some of the progress, but we're going to need more than one year.
00:12:44.000 We had four and we had record illegal immigration, record inflation.
00:12:49.000 It takes a little while to correct it, but we hear you.
00:12:52.000 We're doing everything we can.
00:12:53.000 And give us a little more time to make it better because people are living it.
00:12:57.000 And that also is reality.
00:12:58.000 Yeah.
00:12:59.000 It was so destructive.
00:12:59.000 It's going to take more than a year.
00:13:00.000 Yeah.
00:13:01.000 And that was the toughen up part.
00:13:02.000 It wasn't just like, oh, you need to be tougher.
00:13:03.000 It's like, hey, you're going to have to toughen up to get through this.
00:13:05.000 Give us a little bit of time.
00:13:06.000 That's where we need you to be tough.
00:13:07.000 Hold the line.
00:13:08.000 Give us a minute to fix these things.
00:13:11.000 But don't say it's a con job by the left.
00:13:13.000 Again, this is going back to the Epstein thing, the Epstein hoax.
00:13:15.000 Don't say it's a hoax.
00:13:17.000 Because if you're trying to say that the Dem saying you're in it is a hoax, you're doing it very ineloquently.
00:13:22.000 You're giving the left every opportunity to hit you.
00:13:25.000 What he should say is, you know, those on the left who we didn't hear a peep out of them under the Biden administration trying to say that it's not being released because I'm in the Epstein files.
00:13:33.000 I actually want them released.
00:13:35.000 So that's another hoax from the left, just like Russia, Russia, just like the files compared to what they were next to Biden's Corvair.
00:13:43.000 So, yeah, I think we should release those files.
00:13:45.000 Anyone telling you that I'm in there, I did anything other than work with the authorities, oh, they're trying to peddle another hoax.
00:13:51.000 That, no one would have a problem.
00:13:53.000 It's just a hoax.
00:13:55.000 That's a problem.
00:13:55.000 That's a problem.
00:13:56.000 Yeah.
00:13:56.000 Yeah.
00:13:57.000 But I certainly wouldn't take the alternative, Kamala Harris.
00:14:01.000 I truly believe that if Kamala Harris was president, this country would have ceased to be because we were at such an accelerated rate.
00:14:06.000 Yeah.
00:14:07.000 The illegal immigration, we would probably be at least another 10, 15, if not 20 million illegal aliens under Kamala Harris, the census rule change where you would have entire redistricting where it would be near impossible for any, you would have actually ended up with, I think, really close to a uniparty country if Kamala Harris was president. 0.53
00:14:26.000 So if we're going to burn it all down because we're dissatisfied, and I'm dissatisfied with some, some of the time I'm getting exactly what I voted for, it is incumbent upon the person to provide an alternative.
00:14:39.000 And right now, I mean, we know what the alternative is, and it's scary.
00:14:44.000 Yeah, it's very, very bad.
00:14:45.000 So I think that's what you see generally is support.
00:14:47.000 So I'll keep monitoring the, I don't know if, guys, if I know Hag Seth has spoken at the cabinet meeting, it doesn't seem like CNN covered too much of that, but we do have some interesting tweets if you want to move on to some fun stuff.
00:15:00.000 Okay.
00:15:01.000 So Candace Owens this morning.
00:15:02.000 Oh, I was going to say to find fun.
00:15:04.000 Well, I it's interesting.
00:15:06.000 Okay.
00:15:06.000 This is a pretty big claim here.
00:15:07.000 I mean, she kind of went on.
00:15:09.000 I'll read it for you.
00:15:09.000 Bring that up.
00:15:10.000 This is circulating now.
00:15:11.000 So this is from Candace.
00:15:12.000 Look, it's 7.32 this morning.
00:15:14.000 I received information last night that put the final pieces together for me.
00:15:20.000 I now can say with full confidence that I believe Charlie Kirk was betrayed by the leadership of Turning Point USA and some of the very people who eulogized him on stage.
00:15:31.000 Yes, I will be naming names and providing evidence for my claims.
00:15:36.000 And I am making a personal plea to every well-meaning person who donated to this Godforsaken organization to request a refund.
00:15:44.000 You were lied to and leadership new.
00:15:48.000 Well, wow.
00:15:49.000 Look, I will say this.
00:15:53.000 Getting this in real time.
00:15:55.000 Did she clarify the French, the Legionnaires, too?
00:15:57.000 Did we get the receipts, the evidence for that?
00:15:59.000 I don't think I saw anything.
00:16:01.000 If it's true, then I hope this comes to light.
00:16:06.000 If it's not, she probably lose a lawsuit because they can immediately prove damages. 0.99
00:16:11.000 They can immediately prove damages if people start asking for refunds or people stop donating.
00:16:16.000 And if it's not true that she can prove verifiably that those closest to Charlie Kirk, which doesn't, I would imagine doesn't include Erica, right?
00:16:25.000 Don't imply that.
00:16:25.000 Never Erica.
00:16:27.000 Well, she said closest.
00:16:29.000 Closest.
00:16:30.000 That wouldn't include his wife.
00:16:31.000 No, that wouldn't include his wife.
00:16:32.000 No, no, no, no.
00:16:32.000 And current CEO.
00:16:34.000 If it's not true, the only defense would be, I'm an idiot.
00:16:38.000 I believe this.
00:16:39.000 That would be the only defense because you already meet, if it's not true, if it can't be verified as far as libel or defamation, you already have damages if she made a financial call to action.
00:16:48.000 So I, hey, if that is true, then I hope that we find out and it comes to light.
00:16:53.000 This is one of those, I would say, market.
00:16:56.000 And really, this would be an important litmus.
00:16:59.000 If it's true, great.
00:17:01.000 If it's not, that's going to pose some problems.
00:17:05.000 Yeah.
00:17:05.000 And this is one of those times where, you know, like there have been some squishy claims in the past that I think it's very kind of hard to pin down.
00:17:11.000 Yeah.
00:17:11.000 There's been some other things where it's like, you know, I had these text messages.
00:17:14.000 She did.
00:17:14.000 You know, like, I don't, we weren't even calling her out on that.
00:17:17.000 We were just like, what does it actually mean?
00:17:19.000 This is one of those where you got to kind of show some receipts, too.
00:17:21.000 And you have to be like 100%.
00:17:22.000 Like, if we ever got a story like that, like if we had receipts, we would do a lot of digging to make sure that it was accurate.
00:17:28.000 But Andrew from TPUSA actually posted, I think, a Bible verse is what I'm being told.
00:17:33.000 So let me see.
00:17:34.000 Lying lips are an abomination.
00:17:35.000 So this is actually at 11 this morning.
00:17:38.000 Okay, so maybe it may be in response to that, but it doesn't look like it was tagged on it.
00:17:42.000 Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who act faithfully are his delight.
00:17:46.000 Proverbs 12, 22.
00:17:48.000 To which Candace replied, you shall be hoisted by this scriptural petard.
00:17:53.000 Now, I thought petard was actually like a spear.
00:17:56.000 It's actually not.
00:17:57.000 It's a bomb that was a lot of times attached to a gate.
00:17:59.000 So there's some spear-like elements to it.
00:18:00.000 So my apologies.
00:18:02.000 It's actually a bomb.
00:18:02.000 So basically, you're going to be destroyed by your own trap.
00:18:06.000 Well, he was pretty close with Charlie.
00:18:08.000 So he was very close.
00:18:10.000 Implied that he's in there.
00:18:12.000 I mean, I really, genuinely.
00:18:14.000 I hope not.
00:18:15.000 That would be awful.
00:18:16.000 That would be really sad if his own friends.
00:18:18.000 Now, she has been broad enough with betrayed, where she could say, I didn't say involved in the assassination.
00:18:23.000 I don't know, man.
00:18:24.000 I mean, I'm over.
00:18:26.000 That doesn't still.
00:18:27.000 They betrayed him.
00:18:28.000 They got him Chipotle when he asked for kava.
00:18:30.000 Yes.
00:18:31.000 That's true.
00:18:32.000 That's ridiculous.
00:18:33.000 Baja Fresh, damn it.
00:18:34.000 Yeah.
00:18:35.000 Did they say Baja Fresh?
00:18:36.000 I used to like that more than Chipotle.
00:18:37.000 I don't think.
00:18:37.000 What?
00:18:38.000 But the call to action financially, I would imagine.
00:18:42.000 Screw this.
00:18:43.000 Screw Candace. 1.00
00:18:44.000 What?
00:18:44.000 Baja Fresh?
00:18:45.000 Way better than Chipotle.
00:18:46.000 Oh, really?
00:18:47.000 Chipotle tastes like a Lower East Side cab driver's armpit.
00:18:50.000 First off, why are you tasting the armpits of Lower East Ships? 0.96
00:18:53.000 It's how it smells.
00:18:54.000 There aren't enough air fresheners in the world.
00:18:58.000 Taste not.
00:18:58.000 Scent is connected to taste.
00:19:00.000 Yeah, you wouldn't know that because Somalia.
00:19:02.000 I understand that.
00:19:02.000 70 to 80% of what you taste is what you smell.
00:19:05.000 I got it.
00:19:05.000 But you still have the other 20 to 30, all right?
00:19:07.000 Did Gerald just admit to being Somalian?
00:19:09.000 Yeah.
00:19:11.000 Somalia.
00:19:15.000 How's your mom boob taste? 1.00
00:19:18.000 Somalia? 0.86
00:19:18.000 That's India. 0.86
00:19:19.000 That is true.
00:19:21.000 We were integrating so many ethnicities today.
00:19:23.000 I got them confused.
00:19:24.000 Scott, not feather.
00:19:25.000 There we go.
00:19:26.000 So, but here's another fun one.
00:19:30.000 You remember when we were talking about Jillian Michaels and like new people to the conservative?
00:19:34.000 She responded.
00:19:34.000 To me?
00:19:35.000 Yeah, to you.
00:19:36.000 Oh, okay.
00:19:36.000 I guess this happened pretty recently.
00:19:38.000 I don't know if we can pull it up.
00:19:39.000 Pull it up.
00:19:40.000 I have to look and see.
00:19:41.000 Wow, that's a lot of words, but it's good.
00:19:43.000 Well, here, here we go.
00:19:44.000 If you'd spent five minutes on Google at S. Crowder, that's you, you'd see I've never claimed to be a conservative.
00:19:51.000 I've always said I'm a moderate who happens to enjoy the company of conservatives and prefers the way they govern our over progressives.
00:19:59.000 And if you only trust the concerns of established conservatives, Charlie Kirk was fairly adamant that there's no place for Fuentes in conservatism.
00:20:08.000 To address the rest of your clip montage, my early vote was for Kennedy because America's health has always been my priority or Americans' health.
00:20:17.000 But that's not the point.
00:20:18.000 Oh my gosh, this is long.
00:20:19.000 It is long.
00:20:20.000 I don't know how much I should read.
00:20:21.000 All of it?
00:20:21.000 All of it.
00:20:22.000 Yeah, but that's not the point.
00:20:24.000 Yeah, this is a technical.
00:20:26.000 It's about basic decency.
00:20:27.000 So let me ask you plainly: you're comfortable with the claim that women want to be raped. 0.95
00:20:32.000 That's so static.
00:20:34.000 There's no statistic, moral framework, or political philosophy that validates that.
00:20:38.000 None.
00:20:39.000 You're an idiot.
00:20:40.000 Hold on a second.
00:20:40.000 I was going to say, hold on.
00:20:42.000 You guys have the statistic ready, right?
00:20:43.000 To study from mission control.
00:20:45.000 But go ahead and continue.
00:20:46.000 Mission control, you can grab that.
00:20:47.000 But yes.
00:20:48.000 That's so stupid.
00:20:49.000 Okay.
00:20:50.000 And as I told Don Jr. in the part of the conversation you didn't show, if conservatives can't immediately and unequivocally reject this as not conservatism, progressives will own the midterms 2028 and beyond.
00:21:01.000 That's not partisan.
00:21:02.000 It's obvious.
00:21:02.000 Hold on.
00:21:03.000 That's not what you said.
00:21:03.000 You said if they read all of it, and then I'm going to ask you to read parts.
00:21:08.000 Yeah, it is.
00:21:08.000 This is my call mark card.
00:21:09.000 She is calling.
00:21:11.000 And then I'm going to ask you to read individually because I'm going to go through each claim live with you now.
00:21:15.000 And we'll go through the process and you'll experience it live.
00:21:17.000 But continue reading it so we have the totality.
00:21:20.000 If you can't denounce something this vile, it tells us far more about you than you realize.
00:21:25.000 And look, you strike me as a guy who's not afraid of confrontation.
00:21:29.000 So if you take umbrage with me voting Republican and asking your party to clearly denounce racism, sexual violence, and anti-Semitism, we can always have that conversation face to face instead of through chopped up YouTube clips.
00:21:44.000 Okay, well, as you well know, of course, you're welcome to come on the show, Jillian Michaels.
00:21:48.000 Yes.
00:21:48.000 And a lot of this, some straw men here and some outright factual inaccuracies.
00:21:55.000 Now, my, and by the way, well, okay, let's go through this point by point because right now I'm looking at all of it going like, this is wrong, this is wrong.
00:22:03.000 So let's read it again, start it, and then I'll ask you to pause, Gerald.
00:22:06.000 I apologize.
00:22:07.000 So let's go through the first claims.
00:22:11.000 All right, let's see.
00:22:12.000 So you want me to do it where you're going to be able to do it?
00:22:14.000 Yeah, just read from the top and I'll say from the stuff.
00:22:17.000 So one of the claims.
00:22:18.000 Okay, if you want, if you'd spent more than five minutes, you'd see I've never been conservative.
00:22:22.000 I've always said I'm a moderate who enjoys the company of conservatives and prefers the way they govern over progressives.
00:22:27.000 Okay, pause.
00:22:29.000 Well, then, fine.
00:22:31.000 No issues with me.
00:22:33.000 You're not a conservative.
00:22:34.000 You're not a Republican.
00:22:35.000 I'm fine with that.
00:22:36.000 Then don't tell people who are conservative, Republican or America First how they should govern their party or their movement.
00:22:44.000 My issue is with a woman new to this telling people that you have to do this. 1.00
00:22:50.000 I understand that you'll frame it as though it's just advice because of a midterm, but we're not talking, I'm not talking about political advice.
00:22:56.000 I'm talking about ideologically, if you are not a conservative, if you are not MAGA, if you are not America First, if you are not right-wing, then I have no qualms with you.
00:23:06.000 Just don't tell us how to run our own show.
00:23:09.000 Continue.
00:23:10.000 Next claim.
00:23:11.000 All right.
00:23:12.000 So, and if you only trust the concerns of established conservatives, Charlie Kirk was fairly adamant that there's no place for Fuentes in conservatism.
00:23:20.000 Okay, pause.
00:23:21.000 That's a straw man.
00:23:22.000 I don't only trust the concern of established conservatives.
00:23:26.000 I break with them on quite a bit.
00:23:28.000 And then you have to define what that is.
00:23:30.000 What do you mean by established conservatives?
00:23:32.000 That's a term that people use, and it's often used by people who don't identify as conservative.
00:23:36.000 Do you mean like a Thomas Sowell?
00:23:40.000 Do you mean, I mean, do you mean someone like George Washington?
00:23:44.000 Do you mean Reagan?
00:23:45.000 Or do you mean Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro?
00:23:47.000 Or I don't even understand what she's claiming here because she's making the case that it is incumbent upon everyone to disavow Nick Fuentes.
00:23:56.000 I disagree with Nick Fuentes.
00:23:58.000 And just like I'll host you, I will host him.
00:24:01.000 And I don't like people like you intertwining the idea of disavowing with never talking to.
00:24:08.000 I've talked with people who've literally said that I am of no value to the world.
00:24:13.000 Imams, feminists, transgender mayors.
00:24:17.000 So that's the problem that I have with conflating.
00:24:18.000 But I don't know what you mean by trusting established conservatives.
00:24:21.000 Let's go on to the next claim.
00:24:23.000 All right.
00:24:23.000 So the next claim is here.
00:24:24.000 So, but that's not the point.
00:24:26.000 I'm sorry.
00:24:26.000 Sorry.
00:24:27.000 To address the rest of your clipped montage, my early vote was for Kennedy because Americans' health has always been my priority, but that's not the point.
00:24:34.000 Okay, hold on a second, pause.
00:24:36.000 Clipped montage.
00:24:37.000 I got the implication there.
00:24:39.000 Do you run clips on your show?
00:24:41.000 Jillian?
00:24:44.000 Let me ask you this.
00:24:44.000 I know you do.
00:24:46.000 Right?
00:24:46.000 That's rhetorical.
00:24:48.000 Do you provide references with the full videos for every single clip you run on your show?
00:24:53.000 I do.
00:24:54.000 Do you tell people to go and watch the full segment for context?
00:24:57.000 I do.
00:24:58.000 Every single show.
00:25:00.000 Should you want to make that implication?
00:25:02.000 And I did not clip you out of context.
00:25:05.000 I showed the clip in context to the relevant point and provided links.
00:25:09.000 And I advocate that everyone go and watch your entire show.
00:25:12.000 If there's something that we missed, I'm not seeing it in this post, then we can address it.
00:25:18.000 But that is common practice here.
00:25:19.000 We don't always get it right.
00:25:20.000 Do you put in the same effort?
00:25:22.000 Do you have a bibliography for every single show?
00:25:24.000 Otherwise, you know, probably sit those kinds of implications on your back burner.
00:25:29.000 Next claim.
00:25:31.000 So let me put it right here.
00:25:33.000 So let me ask you.
00:25:34.000 So this isn't ideological.
00:25:35.000 It's about basic decency.
00:25:37.000 Pause.
00:25:39.000 Sorry, Gerald.
00:25:39.000 You're mister.
00:25:40.000 I'm good.
00:25:40.000 You're good.
00:25:42.000 Who defines basic decency?
00:25:44.000 Yeah.
00:25:46.000 Who defines basic decency?
00:25:47.000 And that doesn't matter because we're going to determine basic decency for a society.
00:25:52.000 Ah, that brings us back to how is that determined?
00:25:56.000 By a very specific ideology.
00:25:58.000 That's why I'm conservative.
00:26:00.000 It's conserving the founding ideology of this country.
00:26:04.000 That's what determines basic decency.
00:26:06.000 Otherwise, who's going to determine it?
00:26:08.000 You?
00:26:09.000 Nick Fuentes?
00:26:12.000 Because you both think that you have a corner on basic decency.
00:26:18.000 And I don't necessarily, I don't know all of yours.
00:26:21.000 I can tell you this, not disavow.
00:26:23.000 I don't agree with Nick on quite a few of his views as they relate to basic decency.
00:26:27.000 I guarantee you I disagree with yours because like you said, you were a lifelong more so liberal who's now a moderate or maybe a lifelong moderate who just voted Republican for the first time.
00:26:38.000 I don't want to mischaracterize you, but you would have very different views on basic decency than I do.
00:26:44.000 So the only way you can establish it is ideological as far as the founding of this country because I don't want you or Nick Fuentes determining what is basic decency.
00:26:53.000 Let's go on to the next claim.
00:26:54.000 All right.
00:26:54.000 So it says, so let me ask you plainly, you're comfortable with the claim that, quote, women want to be raped?
00:27:00.000 Hold on a second, pause.
00:27:03.000 No, not only am I not comfortable with the claim that women want to be raped, I'm intensely uncomfortable with you mischaracterizing the viewpoint that women want to be raped.
00:27:14.000 Meaning, you can take words, but you can take them out of context.
00:27:20.000 Does anyone here think it's okay to say that, yeah, women want to be violently raped in an alley way?
00:27:25.000 No.
00:27:26.000 But where would that come from?
00:27:27.000 And this is my issue, right?
00:27:28.000 I probably disagree with Nick Fuentes on a whole lot more than you fully understand.
00:27:33.000 But when you pull that quote, seems a whole lot like that leftist feminist is still in you because it's out of context.
00:27:40.000 You know what you accused me of doing?
00:27:42.000 There is a study, and hopefully Michigan Control could pull up.
00:27:44.000 I believe it's two-thirds of women have to some varying degrees rape fantasies. 1.00
00:27:50.000 Am I right about that?
00:27:51.000 62%.
00:27:52.000 Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy.
00:27:56.000 Which is somewhat higher than previous estimates.
00:27:59.000 This is from PubMed.
00:28:00.000 This is from PubMed.
00:28:01.000 Now, I understand, again, context, Jillian.
00:28:04.000 I understand that when women say they have a rape fantasy, what they really mean, and I also believe that Nick Fuentes probably understands this, and I think that you probably know this as well.
00:28:13.000 It usually means a woman has a fantasy about being ravaged by an attractive man who lusts for her.
00:28:20.000 His carnal desire for her is so overpowering that he can't help himself.
00:28:24.000 And usually he's six foot making six figures with a six pack.
00:28:28.000 Her rape fantasy isn't being raped by the Somalian pirate crackhead in the alleyway. 0.99
00:28:34.000 I understand that.
00:28:35.000 But someone saying, well, that's a thing.
00:28:37.000 You know, women, if they're trying to make a point, and it's in a long list of points, half of women, I believe her claim was, Nick Fuentes said half, half of women have a rape fantasy. 0.87
00:28:48.000 None.
00:28:48.000 No, no, no.
00:28:49.000 She said that Nick Fuentes said.
00:28:51.000 She said there's no statistic, moral framework, or political philosophy that validates that.
00:28:55.000 None.
00:28:56.000 So women want to be raped. 1.00
00:28:57.000 Period.
00:28:58.000 Period.
00:28:58.000 First off, rape is bad.
00:29:00.000 Yes.
00:29:00.000 Jillian Michaels.
00:29:01.000 No one should rape, to be clear. 0.72
00:29:04.000 But I think it's important to define what that is and not mischaracterize people so that you can strawman them.
00:29:08.000 You know, it'd be a lot easier if you had Nick Fuentes on.
00:29:13.000 I'll have you on.
00:29:14.000 How about you have him on?
00:29:15.000 Maybe he can clarify.
00:29:17.000 I would imagine, and again, I disagree.
00:29:19.000 This is a no-win proposition because a lot of people are going to be mad no matter what I say.
00:29:23.000 I would imagine that Nick Fuentes would probably clarify and point you to the study that 62% of women have a rape fantasy that you can find in PubMed.
00:29:31.000 The good news is we provide all of our references link in the description.
00:29:35.000 Again, I ask, do you?
00:29:36.000 So where did that number come from?
00:29:39.000 Published medical journal.
00:29:41.000 Pull it back up real quick.
00:29:42.000 Here's the reason I say that.
00:29:45.000 They have these fantasies at a frequency of about four times per year, with 14% of participants reporting they had a rape fantasy at least once a week.
00:29:53.000 So it's not like it's a one-time thing.
00:29:56.000 It seems to be a repeating, recurring fantasy that a lot of women have. 0.99
00:30:00.000 No one is advocating for rape, aside from Islamic societies. 0.99
00:30:04.000 That's true.
00:30:04.000 No one is advocating for the idea that women are just asking for it and want to be raped.
00:30:10.000 So you should rape them. 1.00
00:30:12.000 It's a valid point to make that sexual norms and gender dynamics tell us.
00:30:18.000 And by the way, a very large body of data suggests that women like sexually dominant men.
00:30:25.000 And they, in some of these studies, categorized it as a rape fantasy.
00:30:31.000 That is not the same as saying that women want to be violently raped.
00:30:35.000 And that is certainly not tantamount to saying that as a society, since we can make this claim, we should allow women to be raped. 0.97
00:30:42.000 Some societies do because they view it as, you know, what you refer to as basic decency.
00:30:47.000 Next claim.
00:30:48.000 All right.
00:30:49.000 As I told Don Jr. in the part of the conversation you didn't show, if conservatives can't immediately and unequivocally reject this as not conservatism, progressives will own that midterms 2028 and beyond.
00:31:00.000 That's not partisan.
00:31:01.000 It's obvious.
00:31:02.000 I understand that point.
00:31:04.000 And I would say that's a valid point to make.
00:31:07.000 I don't necessarily know that it's clear that that's correct, but I think it's a valid opinion to have if you're saying, hey, you need to distance yourself from this.
00:31:15.000 That being said, we also had people who said, you know, you need to distance yourself from the immigration issue.
00:31:21.000 People saying you need to distance yourself from the abortion issue.
00:31:24.000 For a long time, people said you need to distance yourself from the gun issue after Columbine, after Parkland, after, I'm trying to remember the other one.
00:31:34.000 Columbine was a big one. 0.82
00:31:35.000 What was the other?
00:31:36.000 Newtown.
00:31:37.000 Yeah.
00:31:38.000 Guess what?
00:31:39.000 It's now the single losingest issue for Democrats.
00:31:42.000 In other words, what is not politically a winning strategy now, that does not determine whether it is correct or not.
00:31:50.000 Now that, put that aside, that is outside of the conversation to have, is Nick Fuentes right?
00:31:57.000 I think he's wrong about a lot, and I'll talk with him about it.
00:32:00.000 I would suggest that you do the same.
00:32:02.000 The problem I have is with people who have no understanding as to what conservatism, as to what MA is, as to what America First is, telling people what they should do like you're some kind of oracle.
00:32:17.000 And by the way, it's nothing new and it's not particularly original.
00:32:20.000 My primary problem is with you telling people what they need to do or risk losing your vote.
00:32:26.000 It's not one that I particularly value, and I don't think that it's an accurate bellwether as to the future of conservatism.
00:32:33.000 Next claim.
00:32:34.000 If you can't denounce something this vile, it tells us far more about you than you realize.
00:32:39.000 Oh, well, that's the feminist thing. 1.00
00:32:42.000 That's the feminist. 1.00
00:32:44.000 Tell me you're a feminist without saying you're a feminist. 1.00
00:32:46.000 If you can't denounce this person who you haven't spoken with yet based on my quote that I am taking out of context while telling you that playing my actual clip and telling people to go watch the whole interview is out of context, then it says more about your character.
00:33:01.000 Okay, what does this say about my character?
00:33:03.000 I disagree with Nick Fuentes on a whole lot.
00:33:05.000 I think there's a problem with some of his views.
00:33:07.000 I'm going to host him.
00:33:08.000 We're going to talk about it.
00:33:09.000 I would encourage you to do so.
00:33:11.000 And 62% of women, according to the data we have available to us, have rape fantasies.
00:33:17.000 What does that say about me?
00:33:20.000 What does it say about you?
00:33:21.000 Let's not even indebt your character.
00:33:23.000 Intellectually.
00:33:26.000 Were you aware of this?
00:33:28.000 Next claim.
00:33:30.000 And look, you strike me as a guy who's not afraid of confrontation.
00:33:33.000 So if you take umbrage with me voting Republican and asking your party to clearly denounce racism, sexual violence, and anti-Semitism, we can always have the conversation face to face instead of through chopped up YouTube clips.
00:33:45.000 Music to my ears.
00:33:46.000 Bring it back up one more time.
00:33:47.000 If you take umbrage, again, this is a mischaracterization and it's trying to achieve some sort of victim currency here.
00:33:53.000 I didn't say I'd take umbrage with you voting Republican.
00:33:58.000 I'm glad that you're voting Republican.
00:34:01.000 Hey, I don't know what your worldview is faith-wise.
00:34:06.000 I would also welcome you into my church.
00:34:09.000 If you don't know Jesus Christ, your Lord and Savior, I'd like the opportunity to evangelize to you and provide you with all of the information available that you would need to make a decision.
00:34:22.000 Not going to have you preach.
00:34:24.000 First of all, because you're a woman, so you can't be a pastor or a reverend, but most importantly, because you're new here. 0.99
00:34:32.000 So you should sit and learn.
00:34:34.000 Absolutely, you can go to church.
00:34:36.000 Absolutely, you can take part in the activities.
00:34:38.000 And you should sit and learn and submit yourself to the authority of those who have already gained the experience so that they are able to teach.
00:34:45.000 You know, like you do with glute raises.
00:34:50.000 You know it better than them.
00:34:52.000 If someone came in and told you how to train people who just recently got on a fitness kick, you would probably say, well, thanks.
00:34:59.000 I'm glad you're in the gym.
00:35:01.000 But don't tell me how to do something that I've spent my entire life doing.
00:35:05.000 Toning butts.
00:35:08.000 Making fat people get on a treadmill on a reality TV show.
00:35:11.000 I am glad that you have voted Republican.
00:35:13.000 I also understand, by your own description, that you're a fair weather voter, and that could go either way.
00:35:20.000 And so I don't think that we should be basing our strategy or basing any compromising of our principles upon the advice of someone who is new here and doesn't share our principles.
00:35:32.000 I'm glad that you voted Republican.
00:35:34.000 I also would advise people to probably not take advice from someone who is so blissfully unaware as to the data that 62% of women have rape fantasies and that that does not equate to saying women all want to be raped.
00:35:50.000 I don't know if you're ignorant on this issue.
00:35:55.000 And that doesn't mean you're stupid.
00:35:56.000 I don't know if you're ignorant on this issue or if you are manipulating.
00:36:00.000 But it is one of those two because you're wrong in the way you're trying to mischaracterize people and then extend your advice.
00:36:08.000 Well, I reject your mischaracterization.
00:36:10.000 I reject your strumming and I reject your advice.
00:36:12.000 Doesn't mean that I reject you as a person.
00:36:14.000 And it doesn't mean that I would reject you as a personal trainer.
00:36:19.000 I mean, I probably would.
00:36:20.000 But.
00:36:20.000 There's another mischaracterization there, too.
00:36:22.000 She says you won't condemn, what I remember words she said, won't condemn sexual violence.
00:36:27.000 Racism, sexual violence, and anti-Semitism.
00:36:30.000 So she's implying that because you wouldn't say you wouldn't say you disavow Nick Fuentes, that you are okay with sexual violence.
00:36:39.000 I just, I wouldn't.
00:36:40.000 Because he quoted a stat she didn't know about?
00:36:43.000 I don't know if he quoted a stat.
00:36:44.000 It could be like Donald Trump saying hoax or you say, well, maybe he doesn't put eloquently.
00:36:47.000 He said women want to be raped in those contexts.
00:36:51.000 But I don't think he was saying just randomly raped by somebody off the street.
00:36:55.000 He was talking about, I believe, the fantasies that women have. 0.57
00:36:57.000 Is Jillian Michaels, correct me if I'm wrong, I don't know.
00:37:01.000 Is she a lesbian or is she heterosexual? 0.90
00:37:03.000 Do we know?
00:37:03.000 I don't know.
00:37:04.000 Do we know?
00:37:05.000 Can someone look that up?
00:37:08.000 And I genuinely don't know.
00:37:10.000 I thought I believed for some reason that she might be a lesbian. 1.00
00:37:15.000 And again, I could be totally wrong.
00:37:19.000 Her spouse is Deshauna Marie Menudo.
00:37:21.000 Oh, okay.
00:37:22.000 There you go.
00:37:23.000 Well, look, you may differ.
00:37:25.000 You may differ with 62% of women, and I say this respectfully, because you fear the peen. 0.99
00:37:31.000 You recoil at the peen.
00:37:34.000 Change the word rape to ravage. 0.99
00:37:36.000 To ravage.
00:37:37.000 There you go.
00:37:38.000 And I'm okay with a statement.
00:37:39.000 Women in general want to be ravaged sexually. 1.00
00:37:43.000 Again, in a consensual relationship by someone they love.
00:37:46.000 That's what they like.
00:37:48.000 And you know what?
00:37:49.000 I'll lose some Christians here because they'll get mad at me and say, oh, come on, that's not something we should discuss.
00:37:53.000 No, no, we should.
00:37:54.000 Also, young men, it's important that you know that.
00:37:57.000 Because if you're not able to ever take sexual control, you will lose attractiveness in the eyes of your female partner.
00:38:05.000 Again, I find it difficult to take advice from a lesbian on male-female intersexual dynamics because you don't like it. 1.00
00:38:17.000 It's like someone going, damn it, I hate ice cream.
00:38:20.000 What are you doing, Neapolitan?
00:38:22.000 It's like, I give a shit what you say.
00:38:24.000 You hate ice cream.
00:38:25.000 You hate the D. Women who love the D, women who want the D, women who in some capacity have a need for the D biologically, evolutionarily, they like to be ravaged by the D.
00:38:36.000 A majority, not some, a majority.
00:38:39.000 No one is advocating for rape.
00:38:40.000 And that's a liberal tactic.
00:38:41.000 That's a leftist tactic to use.
00:38:43.000 That's the problem I have.
00:38:44.000 And I will tell you this too.
00:38:45.000 It kind of rubs me the wrong way where someone who socially would not share my values or the values of people under the umbrella of conservatism, America First, telling the president's son what he should do, not advising, but it's a requirement that he disavow someone politically.
00:39:06.000 And especially when you know that this is a man who has been canceled in one capacity or another, to use that term, who would obviously be hesitant to do that to someone else, even if he disagrees with him.
00:39:18.000 These two are not logically inconsistent.
00:39:22.000 I think JD Vance said Nick Fuentes is an idiot or something like that and said, and absolutely, he has the right to say what he says.
00:39:32.000 And the truth is, I can't disavow any human being if I don't know all of their views.
00:39:37.000 And by the way, that's a challenge with Nick Fuentes because he kind of switches them a whole lot.
00:39:42.000 I will say this: I know enough about Mamdani's views that I disavow Mamdani, I guess, but what does that mean?
00:39:48.000 I'm not a socialist.
00:39:49.000 And so if Nick Fuentes doesn't identify as a conservative, and as I understand it, he doesn't.
00:39:54.000 Why is it incumbent upon conservatives to disavow him?
00:39:57.000 There's nothing that's intellectually curious, seemingly genuine, or consistent in your assertions here.
00:40:04.000 And I think if you want to tell someone that they're clipping something out of context to try and play some gotcha, along with the implication that I wouldn't face you, you're talking to the wrong guy.
00:40:15.000 And I think that's because you're new around these parts.
00:40:18.000 But we can talk about it.
00:40:20.000 And I will host you very respectfully, even if you are a feminist lesbian who's new to the party. 1.00
00:40:26.000 Anything else?
00:40:28.000 No?
00:40:29.000 All right, pretty good.
00:40:30.000 I'm out.
00:40:30.000 See you tomorrow.
00:40:32.000 Oh, geez.
00:40:33.000 How can we distinguish United States culture from Oklahoma culture, from Oklahoma City culture?
00:40:39.000 Yeah.
00:40:39.000 There are different sizes to it.
00:40:41.000 Sure.
00:40:41.000 And a lot of the smaller parts of this country don't speak English as their native language, simply because a lot of them are immigrants, second-generation immigrants, third-generation immigrants.
00:40:51.000 Yeah.
00:40:52.000 And so why...
00:40:53.000 You just define the difference between national borders and state borders.
00:40:56.000 Yes, sir.
00:40:57.000 Right?
00:40:57.000 And a national border is a language.
00:40:59.000 A national border is net contributions.
00:41:02.000 A national border is you keep your resources here. 0.84
00:41:05.000 If you want to be a part of this nation, you place this nation before all others.
00:41:39.000 That's what I know.