#133 — Globalism on the Brink
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
164.00533
Summary
Ian Bremmer is the president and founder of the Eurasia Group, the leading global political risk research and consulting firm. He's published 10 books, including Superpower, The End of the Free Market, and Every Nation For Itself. He lectures widely and writes a weekly foreign affairs column for Time Magazine. And most recently, he s the author of the new book, Us vs. Them: The Failure of Globalism, which could not be more timely. But before we jump into the book, I m going to give you some background on who Ian is, how he got into politics, and why he thinks we should be worried about the rise of populism in the modern world. We don t run ads on the podcast, and therefore, made possible entirely through the support of our listeners, we re made possible by becoming one of their subscribers. If you enjoy what we re doing here, please consider becoming a supporter of the podcast by becoming a subscriber. You ll get access to all the great shows on the network, including The Making Sense Podcast, wherever you get your news and information, including the latest podcasts and social medias, and so much more. Thanks for listening! Sam Harris, MAKING MINDING MINDS PODCAST to help spread the word about what we're doing here. To learn more about our podcast, check out our excellent work, go to mccarton.ee/makingmmindingsponders/tweet us and subscribe to our podcast on your favorite podcasting platform, wherever else you re listening to it? Thank you, thank you for listening to us, good morning, good day, good evening, good night, bye bye, bye, good love, good chance, good luck, good and good night bye, bye, your good day bye, ma MAGIC AND MURDERER AND RING AND R CHEER AND KELLY AND MALAYTER AND POTTER AND R R EYER AND G R R AND R AND F AND A FOTOGRADE AND R E R AND G AND A CHOT AND F R AND E CHEET AND F CHEOT AND P AND A P AND E AND A SPOT AND M AND A MAG AND A M AND E E AND F Q AND A AND A ME AND A R AND A S AND A SECURED AND A L AND A B AND A N E N E AND S AND F OUT AND A VOTET CHE AND A PLOT AND A COURTEY AND A NA AND A THANKED ME AND AN E N AND A MA AND A Q AND E ...
Transcript
00:00:10.880
Just a note to say that if you're hearing this, you are not currently on our subscriber
00:00:14.680
feed and will only be hearing the first part of this conversation.
00:00:18.420
In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at
00:00:24.060
There you'll find our private RSS feed to add to your favorite podcatcher, along with
00:00:30.520
We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore it's made possible entirely through the support
00:00:35.880
So if you enjoy what we're doing here, please consider becoming one.
00:00:46.580
Well, today I'm speaking with Ian Bremmer, and it's important to know that we recorded
00:00:51.400
this interview before Trump's recent meeting with Putin.
00:00:58.360
Not much would change about the conversation, but it's just good to understand why we are
00:01:02.600
apparently oblivious to the recent news from Helsinki.
00:01:06.780
News that seems, to my eye at least, to be every bit as alarming as the alarmists say
00:01:13.960
Though unsurprising, it is of course no surprise that Trump is sufficiently incompetent and so
00:01:23.540
easily manipulated by his own narcissism and self-interest that he could glad hand a tyrant
00:01:31.380
who kills and jails journalists and his own political opponents and take his side in a
00:01:37.900
controversy that is in fact no controversy against the unanimous understanding of the intelligence
00:01:48.360
And we should note that serious people are using the word treason to describe this.
00:01:53.600
I don't think Ian Bremmer, today's guest, would be one of them.
00:02:00.480
But it'll be very interesting to see if this is yet another thermonuclear scandal that Trump
00:02:07.100
manages to weather or if it actually matters in the end.
00:02:11.420
It really does seem that for 40% of the American population, nothing he can do or say matters.
00:02:18.840
There's no level of incoherency, no level of conflict of interest, no ethical impropriety,
00:02:33.960
Ian Bremmer is the president and founder of the Eurasia Group, the leading global political
00:02:41.660
He's published 10 books, including Superpower, The End of the Free Market, and Every Nation
00:02:48.760
He lectures widely and writes a weekly foreign affairs column for Time Magazine, where he's
00:02:55.180
And most recently, he's the author of the new book, Us vs. Them, The Failure of Globalism.
00:03:04.440
We talk about globalism and all of its problems.
00:03:07.140
The attendant rise of populism, issues like immigration and trade, all of these things
00:03:13.500
are all too relevant to our current circumstance.
00:03:16.660
So without further ado, I bring you Ian Bremmer.
00:03:30.120
I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but I recall meeting you only once.
00:03:37.420
I don't know if it was a CNN show or something else.
00:03:45.960
I mean, I feel like I know you so much better from, you know, End of Faith and various speeches
00:03:54.680
And so if we met in a green room, it was so much less significant than that that it is
00:04:05.740
So it's great to finally meet you virtually and for good reason, because you have a new
00:04:19.560
But before we jump into the book, give me your potted biography.
00:04:25.900
I'm a political scientist, and I think of myself that way.
00:04:29.760
I was trained out in the West Coast at Stanford.
00:04:33.320
Originally, I was kind of a post-Sovietologist.
00:04:35.740
I started working on things, former Soviet as that country slash empire was in the process
00:04:42.260
of falling apart and speak Russian and lived out there for a few years.
00:04:46.620
When I finished my PhD, I was an academic for a couple of years and then basically started
00:04:52.140
a company because there was apparently no company for political scientists.
00:04:57.300
And I really wanted to still be a political scientist.
00:05:01.480
And we have a couple hundred folks, and we all look at how politics affect the markets
00:05:07.960
You've written this book, which doesn't give too many causes for optimism, at least in the
00:05:14.300
Let me see if I can summarize your worries here.
00:05:16.960
You have this argument that those of us who have benefited from globalization and are now
00:05:23.960
worried about the rise of populism everywhere need to be very careful not to discount the
00:05:29.800
concerns of the people who have voted in the populace, and in our case, who have voted for
00:05:35.460
And you're making a very detailed case for the legitimacy of certain concerns about trade
00:05:42.940
and immigration and this general way in which the support for cosmopolitanism and the celebration
00:05:51.100
of cultural diversity and the free exchange of goods and ideas that seems universally subscribed
00:05:58.440
among wealthy and educated people at this moment is leading to a breakdown of trust and an erosion
00:06:04.800
of social capital among people who are less well-off.
00:06:08.840
And so people like ourselves mock the populace at our peril because there really is something
00:06:16.120
And business as usual is not going to serve us well.
00:06:20.280
Is that a fair summary of where your head is at at the moment?
00:06:24.120
And I mean, you know, you would think by I mean, if you just came down from from another
00:06:30.360
planet and and showed up in the United States right now, you would certainly think you turn
00:06:37.040
You think the reason why we have all these problems is because of this crazy person called
00:06:44.500
I mean, fundamentally, first of all, it's something that's much broader than just the United States.
00:06:48.760
So you can't look at the solutions as only being limited to the American president.
00:06:53.780
And and much more important than Trump being elected is how you got to a place where more
00:06:59.820
people didn't bother to vote than voted for Hillary or that so many would have voted for
00:07:05.260
someone who so clearly was incapable in so many ways of actually leading the country.
00:07:13.560
And and absolutely, I believe that there are just way too many people that don't believe
00:07:20.820
that there is complicity on the part of the globalists over the part of the past decades,
00:07:26.920
myself very much included in being in being responsible for this problem.
00:07:32.120
Well, let's define a few terms here because I've used several which I think most people
00:07:37.800
have a vague sense of, but I think very few will have a precise definition for in their
00:07:43.680
How would you differentiate, for instance, globalism versus globalization?
00:07:49.680
So when I talk about globalists, I'm talking about the Jews, right?
00:07:56.840
It's funny how in that there have been some in the alt right that have tried to to take
00:08:05.860
Actually, when I talk about globalism, I'm talking about a philosophy, an ideology that's
00:08:16.180
So public intellectuals, political leaders, corporate leaders, business leaders, media leaders
00:08:21.860
that free trade, open borders and global security provided by the U.S.
00:08:28.340
and our allies would was the way to go and further would be the best for all of our citizens.
00:08:36.360
It's really a political ideology where globalization is something I'm a huge fan of.
00:08:43.120
That's an economic process that shows that bringing goods and services and ideas all over
00:08:49.320
the world is going to create more global wealth and make our lives better.
00:08:53.520
And certainly, you know, if you look at today's planet and the fact that we have, you know,
00:09:01.740
one global middle class as opposed to a few really rich people and a lot of crushingly
00:09:09.680
And most of the world is literate today and most of the world lives over 70 years of age
00:09:14.740
and 90 percent of one year olds get a get an immunization.
00:09:18.900
And I mean, you know, the world is more free of suffering today than at any point in history.
00:09:23.120
And I know you've talked to Steve Pinker in the past recently and others that are that
00:09:27.680
tell that story much more refreshingly than I certainly would.
00:09:34.880
I'm not, you know, focused on on the global economic trends or demographic trends.
00:09:41.300
And from the political science perspective, the advanced industrial democracies, the liberal
00:09:46.380
democracies that have benefited from promoting globalism in their borders have really failed
00:09:54.380
And we see a lot of structural inequality that's only growing as a consequence of that.
00:09:58.300
And a lot of people that feel very displaced and they either completely check out of the
00:10:06.080
And and I don't see that changing anytime soon.
00:10:12.040
I used a term, I believe, that's pretty close in meaning to globalism, but doesn't have the
00:10:17.740
same negative connotation, at least in many people's minds.
00:10:23.220
And I don't know if you would see much daylight between those two concepts.
00:10:26.900
But for me, cosmopolitanism is this sense that humanity is a single community in principle,
00:10:36.580
at least if not always in practice, and that we can have a reasonable expectation that we
00:10:41.500
will all converge on the same moral and political norms if given enough time, and that therefore
00:10:46.800
differences in background, you know, just the sheer accidents of birth don't ultimately
00:10:52.960
And there's this phrase that sounds that it might be of recent coinage, but actually it
00:10:58.880
goes all the way back to the ancient Greeks, this notion of being a citizen of the world.
00:11:03.240
And this is a an attitude that many of us have adopted because we do view ourselves as citizens
00:11:10.380
Our interests are not so narrowly anchored within our own political national borders.
00:11:17.680
And as you point out, the success of so many things, you know, a reduction in violence,
00:11:23.880
a reduction in war, reduction in illiteracy, or a reduction in basic health epidemics, the
00:11:31.720
These are tithes that can, at least in principle, lift all boats.
00:11:35.820
And yet, this is, seems to be put in peril now by the rise of a, another term we've used
00:11:53.460
I mean, populism, the idea that, you know, your people are the ones that need to be promoted
00:11:59.540
and it's, you know, X first, it does America first, whites first, blacks first, I mean,
00:12:08.240
But it's, it's a reduction of humanity to much smaller constituent and usually identity
00:12:16.400
I like the way you, you just talked about cosmopolitanism.
00:12:23.900
So I grew up in the seventies and eighties and I remember that when I was in high school
00:12:28.360
and college, people used to always ask me my astrological sign, right?
00:12:34.580
And I don't know about you, Sam, what are you, Sam?
00:12:36.720
I'm an Aries, but Aries don't believe in astrology.
00:12:41.100
You don't need, I mean, I, I, from, from, from the end of faith perspective, I, I'm, I'm,
00:12:45.060
I'm not surprised, but, um, you know, I, I, I'm a Scorpio and I, I liked being a Scorpio
00:12:50.500
and I, my mom used to read, um, you know, sort of the, uh, the horoscopes and what I
00:12:55.100
liked about being a Scorpio aside from the fact there were cool things you could read
00:12:58.380
into Scorpio nests, you know, serious loyalty, a little bit secretive, you know, I mean, that
00:13:02.980
kind of thing is also that, you know, everyone had a shot at one of these 12 things and the
00:13:10.480
fact that, so you're going to be different from your family members and your Venn diagram
00:13:16.960
Doesn't matter your class, doesn't matter your gender, you're white or black, what country
00:13:21.820
you're from, everyone gets a shot at a cool horoscope sign, right?
00:13:25.640
So it's kind of, it's a good ideology for cosmopolitans, right?
00:13:30.900
Um, it's, so there's a lot of Venn diagram intersection and overlappingness.
00:13:35.860
You look at the world today and, um, people think of themselves much more as Americans or
00:13:45.280
other, nobody asks about astrological sign anymore.
00:13:48.900
Uh, but if we get on social media, we've got algorithms and technology that are doing
00:13:57.780
Um, and, and, and I think that that really undermines civic nationalism and it really promotes
00:14:08.300
We only watch things that we like because we are the product, um, that's being sold,
00:14:15.320
um, to ensure maximization of advertising revenue.
00:14:21.780
I'll give you one more stupid example, Sam, but since I'm in the, in the mindset for it
00:14:25.800
on Monday, I, I went to jury duty and, uh, you know, we do jury duty every six years.
00:14:32.100
I kind of like it, um, because it's one of these things in America that brings everyone together.
00:14:37.120
And Lord knows in New York, that's even more true.
00:14:39.700
So last time I was there six years ago, had my jury duty and you all listen to the, watch
00:14:47.280
And by the way, same orientation video that I saw this Monday.
00:14:50.860
And then after that, six years ago, some people watching the paper, reading the paper.
00:14:55.120
Some people are, you know, sort of reading a book.
00:14:57.680
Um, you had a couple of people go outside for a smoke, but over the course of the day,
00:15:04.520
And there were a couple of people I actually stayed in touch with.
00:15:07.120
Just from jury duty, six years ago, I remember this 55 year old woman that taught in a local
00:15:13.000
community college who we ended up being in touch with each other.
00:15:16.420
And her kid wanted to be a political scientist.
00:15:19.620
This Monday, we finished the same orientation video.
00:15:23.340
And right after the video was over, I would say with one or two exceptions in the entire
00:15:28.760
room of two to 300, every single person was either on their phone or on their computer.
00:15:34.680
No one was worried about how much time they were wasting.
00:15:36.860
They were all engaged in their own world, engaged with people that were much more like
00:15:41.940
And no one talked to each other at all, except maybe borrowing a pen.
00:15:49.240
It was all reverting to much more like for like.
00:15:55.080
And I think that of all of the trends that are stimulating us versus them style populism,
00:16:03.420
the backlash to free trade and open borders and globalization and the fact that the working
00:16:09.660
class isn't doing as well as they used to in the in the West, the backlash to open borders
00:16:15.520
and different people coming in and changing our demographics, the backlash to U.S. and its
00:16:21.300
allies, fighting and failed wars and sending, you know, poor enlisted men and women off to
00:16:28.540
battle and coming back in pieces and not being treated very well.
00:16:32.600
Of all of those things which have been coming for decades, the one that is by far the most
00:16:37.220
debilitating in my view and that I'm the most negative about are these technological
00:16:41.440
transformations that we've seen just in the last five years.
00:16:45.020
Yeah, well, this is something I've thought more and more about just the effect of social
00:16:48.760
media on myself personally and on society at large.
00:16:52.480
I notice you have, I think, 32,000 tweets to your name.
00:16:59.300
I would say you might have a problem if you sent that many tweets.
00:17:02.900
What do you think about the effect of social media here?
00:17:06.340
And are we in danger of exaggerating the problem of political polarization?
00:17:12.260
I mean, it certainly seems like we're in a very new place speaking domestically at the
00:17:18.640
moment with the rise of Trump and the fact that the two sides of the political spectrum
00:17:24.500
seemingly cannot have a civil conversation about facts anymore.
00:17:30.320
Is this an illusion of much deeper fragmentation in our society or is it in fact real?
00:17:36.460
I think it's becoming much more real, much more quickly.
00:17:40.440
I think that the fake news and disinformation problem is one that is facilitated in part by
00:17:47.680
a media space that has fragmented away from three big networks where the personalities were
00:17:54.020
different, but the news that you consumed was the same to one where now the news that you
00:17:58.600
consume if you support Trump or if you oppose Trump is actually completely different.
00:18:03.440
And, you know, I usually I try to run outside if the weather's nice, but if it's not, I'll
00:18:08.720
be on the treadmill and I try to watch a little Fox and a little CNN or MSNBC in the morning
00:18:14.600
when I'm doing and it's obvious that the headlines are different planets and and have very little
00:18:22.140
And the ability as a consequence to really change the narrative, I mean, you know, getting
00:18:27.480
Trump supporters over the course of literally just a year to go from law and order.
00:18:33.000
We love the FBI and the Department of Justice to these guys are complicit and they're in
00:18:38.460
the tank for the Democrats and we want to undermine them.
00:18:41.440
And that's a dramatic ideological change that's facilitated by getting the same news from a filter
00:18:50.520
bubble all the time and only listening to people that agree with that and push you in a more
00:18:58.180
And if you combine that with, you know, our own neuroplasticity, the fact that, you know, sort of
00:19:04.380
our brains rewire pretty damn quickly in response to changed environments, whether it's losing sight
00:19:12.440
or losing a hand or whether it's starting to, you know, sort of develop sympathies for our
00:19:22.940
I mean, our brains have effectively been hijacked by a much narrower slice of political
00:19:34.180
And our kids are adapting much more quickly because, of course, they're growing up with nothing but 24
00:19:40.480
seven online. And once that moves towards augmented reality, I really do fear that it's going to be
00:19:48.580
much harder for us to be cosmopolitans ever again.
00:19:53.120
Yeah. Some of the changes in ideology on the right post Trump have been fairly bewildering.
00:19:59.880
The fact that Putin is a celebrated figure among Republicans now, this is the party that imagines
00:20:07.040
it won the Cold War, you know, and to some degree validly imagines it won the Cold War.
00:20:12.840
This is the party that you would expect would be the last to lose sight of the problem with
00:20:20.680
someone like Vladimir Putin. And yet it seems like he has a better reputation among Republicans now
00:20:28.960
than certainly any Democrat. There's one fact you cite in your book that's just straight up terrifying,
00:20:36.000
the fact that there's a Washington Post poll that found that a majority of Republican voters,
00:20:41.120
a majority, said they would favor postponing the 2020 election if Trump suggested it.
00:20:46.960
One can only hope this is one of those poll questions where many people just didn't understand
00:20:51.540
the implications of the box they were checking. But I mean, that's just patently insane
00:20:56.740
to think that a majority of Republicans would favor that.
00:21:00.200
Yeah, I hope you're right. But I also feel that a lot of people believe that democracy isn't a good
00:21:10.620
system because they don't think we live in a democracy. They think the system pretends to be
00:21:14.780
a democracy and it's rigged. It's a it's it's in reality a Potemkin democracy where you get
00:21:20.580
fundamentally different types of policing or jurisprudence and lawyering or educational opportunities
00:21:28.680
and all the rest if you're from a privileged class. And that's not the America that we were
00:21:34.060
brought up to believe in. But I do think that's a concern. And, you know, my mother's not with us
00:21:39.740
anymore. But if she were and I say this in the opening of the book, she would have voted for Trump.
00:21:44.020
My brother did. And that's because they fundamentally believe that the system is rigged against
00:21:48.740
poor folks that don't matter. And and as much as I consider myself a cosmopolitan strongly,
00:21:55.400
I mean, you know, only by accident of history do I happen to be an American or was I raised Catholic?
00:22:00.960
And if I was raised Buddhist or if I was Japanese, would that make me think that, you know, the
00:22:06.040
American system was still better than the other ones? Probably not. Right. So, I mean, I have a hard
00:22:10.840
time being less than ecumenical about these things personally. And yet I'm really sympathetic to people
00:22:17.780
that want to blow up the system. I'm really sympathetic to the anger of people that look at the role of
00:22:24.040
money in American elections and look at the failure of the American dream for so many Americans and
00:22:30.300
say, you know what, this system isn't working. So if you give me something else, irrespective of what it
00:22:35.200
was, I mean, Brexit was such an obviously stupid thing for the future of the UK. I mean, just on every
00:22:41.420
count, it was obvious to anyone with any sense in their head that the only deal that would be made
00:22:47.800
possible for the UK with the EU after leaving would be one that was worse for the UK than the status quo ante.
00:22:56.820
Like that is on its face obvious. But if you are someone that feels like the system has been lying to you for
00:23:03.800
decades and that no matter who you vote for, what you do, it's going to continue to find a way to screw you and
00:23:09.780
benefit them, then voting for Brexit simply to make the establishment pay attention to you suddenly
00:23:18.140
becomes a rational thing. Yeah. Let's talk about a few of the pieces here that are relevant. I guess
00:23:24.220
immigration and open borders within the EU might be a good place to start. So immigration is
00:23:31.400
often described as something that has no downside for you. If you'd like to continue listening to
00:23:39.720
this conversation, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to
00:23:45.020
all full-length episodes of the Making Sense podcast, along with other subscriber-only content,
00:23:50.100
including bonus episodes and AMAs and the conversations I've been having on the Waking Up app.
00:23:55.620
The Making Sense podcast is ad-free and relies entirely on listener support,