#183 — A Conversation with Paul Bloom
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
170.28134
Summary
The death of Kobe Bryant and his 13-year-old daughter in a helicopter crash on the morning of July 31st, 2014, left a world of grief and shock. In this episode, I speak with author and journalist Paul Bloom about Kobe Bryant s death and the impact it had on his family and the world, and how the death of a celebrity like this cuts through death denial and denial in a way that few other events do, and cuts through the numbness and numbness that comes with the grief that comes from losing a loved one in such a tragic accident. I also talk about how the loss of a child in an accident like this can have a profound impact on a person s life and how it can change the way we think about death and loss, especially when it's someone we care deeply about. This episode is a special episode of the Making Sense podcast, featuring a conversation I had with the author and writer Paul Bloom, who has written a book about Kobe s tragic loss, Kobe Bryant's tragic helicopter crash and his daughter's tragic death. I hope you ll join me in this conversation. Thanks to Paul Bloom for joining me in the first episode of The Making Sense Podcast, and for being kind enough to share his thoughts on the tragic loss of one of the greatest athletes of our time. Thank you, Paul Bloom. Make sense. -Sam Harris - Music by Ian Dorsch and John Singleton, produced by Ian McKirdy, courtesy of NPR, and edited by Mark Phillips, and produced by Matthew Boll, and written by Alex Blumberg, and the excellent editor and editor of The New York Times bestselling author of the excellent new book, "Making Sense" and the New York Sun's "Make Sense" is out on the podcast "Kobe Bryant" by Sam Harris, "Bryant's Death" by the late Kobe Bryant, "No Questions Asked" by Mark Halberstell, "The Other Way" by Kevin McLeod, is out in honor of Kobe's daughter, "A Better Thing" by Sarah, "Sister" is "The Real Thing" and "The Girl Who Was There's Not Here." -- in the new album "The Death is Not Here by Kobe's Death by Kobe Bryant?" by The New Edition's "The Man Who Didn't Die" by The Real Thing?" -- is out now on the internet?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
welcome to the making sense podcast this is sam harris just a note to say that if you're hearing
00:00:22.440
this you're not currently on our subscriber feed and we'll only be hearing partial episodes of the
00:00:27.480
podcast if you'd like access to full episodes you'll need to subscribe at sam harris.org there
00:00:33.700
you'll find our private rss feed to add to your favorite podcatcher along with other subscriber
00:00:38.640
only content and as always i never want money to be the reason why someone can't listen to the
00:00:43.460
podcast so if you can't afford a subscription there's an option at sam harris.org to request
00:00:48.520
a free account and we grant 100 of those requests no questions asked okay i am here with paul bloom
00:00:57.240
paul thanks for joining me hey sam thanks for having me so uh just a little preamble to um
00:01:03.480
set up this conversation i i have been thinking of late that i've been kind of getting boxed in
00:01:10.360
in my normal podcast format i mean i'm often having conversations with people where you know they've
00:01:17.280
written a book very likely and you know i've taken rather often taken the time to read it and this may
00:01:23.240
be the one conversation i ever have with them and so it really has to be you know focused on their
00:01:30.740
topic and fairly buttoned up and exhaustive and doesn't really allow me in most cases to just kind
00:01:38.980
of wander around and hit topics of interest and be a little more free form and conversational and
00:01:46.700
so i was thinking of starting a new track in the podcast where i can be more topical and kind of of
00:01:54.260
the moment and experimental and talk about work in progress and all the rest and i was thinking about
00:02:01.180
who i could do that with and you were the first person to come to mind and so and i you know as you
00:02:06.260
know i reached out to you and here you are so thank you for agreeing to do this well i i was i was
00:02:11.220
really thrilled to be invited to do this i i've always felt that our conversations go very well
00:02:15.940
and i think it's because you and i hit a certain sweet spot where we agree and disagree and in the
00:02:20.940
right measure making our conversation sort of productive but not us constantly saying to one
00:02:25.940
another oh you're right you know you're exactly right so this should be fun yeah yeah and uh so i
00:02:31.220
must apologize in advance i have a cold for our inaugural conversation and um if you catch it over
00:02:37.980
there at yale i think it will be due to an excess of empathy on your part my biggest weakness okay
00:02:44.520
well we have to begin on an unhappy note because we are speaking today in the aftermath of kobe bryant
00:02:51.720
dying in a helicopter crash along with his 13 year old daughter and i believe it's seven other people
00:02:57.960
we're speaking on on the monday after and you know the outpouring of grief and um just the kind of
00:03:06.300
the way the world seemed to stop around this event in my memory the the only thing i remember like it
00:03:12.280
was princess diana dying i don't know if that's uh what else compares to that but um how do you
00:03:19.580
perceive moments like this i mean this one is complicated by several other factors which we'll
00:03:25.820
go into but it's pretty uh breathtaking the way the death of a celebrity like this cuts through
00:03:34.260
death denial in a way that a few other events do it's really affecting i was in um in london on
00:03:41.020
sabbatical when princess diana was killed in this car crash and the outpouring of grief was extraordinary
00:03:48.560
the streets emptied out while people went to the funeral or watched it on tv people could talk about
00:03:54.000
nothing else and people were viscerally affected you'd you'd walk past people on the streets who were
00:04:00.260
weeping and and it's extraordinary i think when it comes to certain sources celebrities the amount
00:04:07.820
of personal contact people have it's it's a lot of people were more said that they were more affected
00:04:13.400
by her death than the death of their brother or or their their mother it's it's this powerful feeling
00:04:20.280
that and it's not only that she was beloved it's that she was some sort of i don't know fairy tale
00:04:26.620
character for them and and i think great athletes often fill a similar niche for us yeah and also his
00:04:34.840
13 year old daughter who looked like she was going to be a superstar basketball player in her own right
00:04:41.720
that was really devastating in fact it wasn't clear that she was on the helicopter at first so his death
00:04:50.260
was announced and then you saw all these images of him with his daughters circulating and then to find
00:04:57.120
out that she was also killed it was really um brutal i mean there's the familiarity component in the fact
00:05:03.480
that you've seen this person so much but this is an additional fact that it's just it pings the you know if
00:05:11.380
it can happen to them it can happen to anyone part of the brain in some way so that it makes life seem
00:05:16.840
especially precarious and you know again especially with a child involved and dying in an accident in
00:05:24.720
this way it's yeah you could have a you could have a taxonomy of deaths of people you don't know
00:05:29.240
on the one extreme is older people in their 70s in their 80s where you know it could be sad it could be
00:05:34.820
really affecting but in the end it's not a shock it doesn't seem particularly unjust then you get young
00:05:41.260
people and this is a case we're dealing with now and and that could be far more moving it seems so
00:05:47.020
arbitrary and and frightening and then you get children and children children are the worst you
00:05:53.680
know it is the worst when something like that happens to a kid you could look at any adult and
00:05:58.560
say good things and bad things about them and they have their friends and their enemies but you know
00:06:03.500
if there's one thing everybody agrees on it's that it's that kids shouldn't die and and it's it is if
00:06:10.400
you ever want an argument for the for the cruelty if there is a god of god it'd be the death of
00:06:15.860
children yeah it really is the the argument for which there is no rebuttal you know the the normal
00:06:21.920
arguments about free will and any kind of justice for a person's behavior while alive is obviously it
00:06:30.460
doesn't apply to kids so really it has become the perfect storm on social media because you know
00:06:39.100
immediately upon the announcement of his death it might have been before anyone realized his daughter
00:06:46.520
was involved there was this washington post writer felicia sonmez i'm not quite sure how to pronounce
00:06:54.340
that last name who tweeted a link to a 2016 daily beast article written by somebody else detailing the
00:07:02.380
never quite settled to everyone's satisfaction rape allegations against bryant and the response to that
00:07:10.500
was absolutely infernal she's actually just been put on administrative leave from the post and um this is
00:07:19.720
one of those moments where it landed with me i don't know if i'm representative of most people here i mean i i'm
00:07:26.220
i'm not a basketball fan i you know kobe really hasn't had much of a space in my brain and i was aware of
00:07:33.480
obviously these allegations against him and was still not aware of what i think about them i mean it's just obvious
00:07:39.180
they precede the me too moment had they come about now there's no way he would have not been canceled but you know
00:07:47.480
they predate everyone's heightened awareness of these issues and so she was you know re-promoting the scandal
00:07:55.100
in the immediate i mean to say the immediate aftermath of his death i mean it was like literally within
00:08:00.880
10 minutes or something it seemed an example of enormous bad taste given you know what his family
00:08:09.920
is now dealing with but it's it is an interesting question just what is appropriate to acknowledge
00:08:18.240
about a person when is too soon and what's the right way to play a moment like that it's just you
00:08:25.020
know again it struck i think almost everyone as fairly tactless and masochistic on her part but
00:08:31.840
i don't know where the line is and it's just interesting to see what social media has done to
00:08:37.440
us here because it's tempting to feel like you need to express an opinion at moments like this if you have
00:08:43.080
any public profile and you know she has is certainly reaping the results of having expressed hers
00:08:50.280
i don't know what the rules are here i don't think she knew either this conservative figure
00:08:57.140
roger scrutin he died recently and for the most part a lot of his friends and family and his fans
00:09:02.760
posted you know gentle stories about him and respect for him and expressed her sadness but there were many
00:09:09.360
people who said this guy said awful things and and maybe was an awful guy and so much you know so much
00:09:15.760
better the world is without him and i my own bias is that we should always err in favor of being kind
00:09:23.200
to the dead at least in the short term but you know there are different views on this i know christopher
00:09:28.420
hitchens famously your your friend hitch argued that that we should not be kind to the recently dead
00:09:35.320
if we think they were terrible we should be up front and say this yeah i'll just remind people that
00:09:40.740
he was on the news savaging jerry falwell at that point and then given that i shared his views of
00:09:47.240
falwell i really didn't feel much critical distance from that savaging but um i saw the other side of
00:09:54.560
that very equation when glenn greenwald wasted no time dancing on hitch's grave when he died and you
00:10:02.460
know it struck me as you know fairly craven given that you know this is the kind of thing he
00:10:07.960
wouldn't have fared well saying to hitch his face i mean in this case it just seemed like
00:10:12.960
the grief of kobe's family needed to be so paramount you're just imagining a his wife and her remaining
00:10:25.100
daughters dealing with the death of a husband father and a daughter as well and it's just that moment
00:10:35.040
to press the unresolved me too case against bryant which was again it's not so clear i mean you know
00:10:42.720
the infidelity part is clear and you can be as judgmental about that as you want but it's just
00:10:47.400
not really your place to judge if the marriage survived it right i mean who knows what the
00:10:53.160
understanding is or was between his wife and himself at that point it's like given that it's unsettled it
00:11:00.400
just i don't know it was kind of a self-immolation of a journalist i'm not sure that was the hill she
00:11:06.260
was uh right to want to die on so that's one way of looking at it which is the accusation was uncertain
00:11:11.680
and given that you shouldn't have brought it up but there may be other things going on if in that
00:11:18.720
case for instance if it was mike tyson who had actually you know done time for rape bringing you
00:11:24.180
know saying well there's a dead rapist now i people might have a different feeling about that well they're
00:11:30.400
that opens the other issue of just the kind of the moral significance of having done one's time
00:11:35.900
and this is actually something i want to talk to you about and we can get there when we get there but
00:11:40.540
what are the physics of redemption i mean we have someone do something awful let's say there's no
00:11:46.640
uncertainty about it you know we think it's awful they admit it was awful what constitutes an
00:11:53.000
appropriate readmission to our good graces how does somebody get their reputation back
00:11:59.260
when they've done something terrible and we and we have examples of this i mean there are
00:12:04.280
murderers who get out of prison who then become you know paradigmatic stories of you know moral
00:12:10.700
rehabilitation and then on the other end of the continuum we have people wanting to cancel someone
00:12:16.320
for all time for a few errant tweets that they unleashed as teenagers how do you think about that even in
00:12:22.740
the case where the previous moral infraction is quite clear it's it's a good question i'll say just
00:12:30.800
two things one thing is i think that one force in all of this that that we should acknowledge is
00:12:35.840
i think we we pull apart particularly famous people they're either good or evil they're either
00:12:41.680
princess diana or jeffrey epstein and if you know and there are forces that pull you to one end or
00:12:48.560
another the idea of saying okay this guy died and there was goodness and there was badness and he
00:12:53.800
has critics he has his friends is uncomfortable particularly over social media you have to take
00:12:58.560
one side or another as for redemption you know you're right there are all of these famous cases of
00:13:05.160
these uh these neo-nazis who became you know crusaders for to help minorities there's people who
00:13:10.560
murderers who have achieved in the eyes of others what you see as redemption but i'm trying to think of
00:13:17.800
this and i can't can you tell me one famous celebrity figure who was really uh used today's word
00:13:25.280
canceled and now is in everybody's good graces i don't know peewee herman yeah i mean well i i don't
00:13:33.320
know that anyone is paying attention to him now but yeah i think he did sort of come back and get
00:13:39.220
redeemed but you know kobe might have been i mean tyson is also an example of this but i mean both kobe
00:13:45.120
and tyson are examples of people who really more or less made it all the way back for most people i
00:13:53.680
mean i you know it's kobe to an enormous degree i mean he just his career most of his triumph was
00:14:01.000
still ahead of him you know as an athlete i could have that slightly wrong again i don't follow
00:14:05.980
basketball but i mean he was like 25 or 26 when that scandal broke and you know he died at 41 so
00:14:14.000
i mean i guess once you're tarnished you're always going to be tarnished in somebody's eyes but
00:14:18.220
that was a pretty solid example of yeah having put it behind him so so what did he do right in case
00:14:26.460
a practical advice for anybody listening to this or for you and me if we ever really get into trouble
00:14:31.840
what's the technique for for achieving public redemption well it sort of depends on what for
00:14:37.140
i think there's some unhappy data on the efficacy of a the rather trumpian tactic of never apologizing
00:14:46.160
right i mean there's some social science data suggesting apologies backfire yeah and in the
00:14:51.440
political scheme apologies they just i've seen apologies by people who have done inappropriate
00:14:56.180
things and their enemies just mock them and say we wanted more yeah yeah so it is interesting to
00:15:03.000
consider what constitutes a and what should constitute a acceptable apology i mean whether
00:15:09.460
it has strategic value in general i think in the case of something like accusations of rape are their
00:15:15.080
their own thing but i mean just take the infidelity part of it the crucially exculpatory thing
00:15:20.360
in the case of somebody like kobe bryant or you know like tiger woods is whether or not the wife
00:15:26.880
you know stands by your side right i mean that yeah it's a different outcome or the husband as the
00:15:33.620
case may be but yeah you know i again i didn't follow it so closely but i mean he just seemed to
00:15:38.760
have come all the way back and again it was pre me too it's hard to imagine it would have survived the
00:15:46.600
glare of the present moment i guess bill clinton is a sort of parallel case although yeah because
00:15:53.620
his infidelities and and the accusations of rape happened when he was when he was president and a lot
00:16:00.380
of people supported him at the time he was never he never really fell that much from grace but but i
00:16:06.320
think the fact he was supported by his family and i think there's sort of at least he tried to tell a
00:16:11.140
redemption story probably reasonably successful when he uh when when he dies people will be saying
00:16:16.460
wonderful things about him yeah that's another example where hitch was on the case i don't know
00:16:21.860
if you ever read his book yeah no one left to lie to the triangulations of william jefferson clinton
00:16:27.060
but um hitch went all in on the accusations of rape there and i must say it i mean it's been a long
00:16:34.000
time since i've looked at that book but i found it fairly persuasive and it reset my view of clinton
00:16:42.020
and whatever's true about the extreme accusations there that the utter dysfunction of his marriage
00:16:50.600
with hillary or whatever or the political liability of whatever deal they had cut in their marriage came
00:16:57.640
back in the 2016 election when she's on stage debating an opponent who was eminently cancelable
00:17:07.120
based on his own sexual transgressions and you know the legion accusations yeah that he was trailing
00:17:13.840
and and yet to that debate he brought you know bill clinton's accusers into the audience and you know
00:17:21.720
hillary couldn't say a word about any of this because of how she had conducted herself during the
00:17:27.480
time of you know her husband's presidency and when those accusations were surfacing how she just
00:17:32.300
excoriated these women as liars and gold diggers and i mean just she was so on the wrong side of
00:17:39.440
history there and so apparently dishonest in how she took his side and you know scheming in a
00:17:46.820
lady mcbeth sort of way i mean it's just everything lined up to just completely neutralize her at a moment
00:17:53.820
where she would have had an overwhelming political advantage yeah yeah it it is one of a set of ways
00:18:00.000
in which it would be better to have somebody running against trump at the time and but this is also an
00:18:04.340
example of something you and i have talked about before which is how our moral code now causes us to
00:18:10.600
reevaluate things in the past sometimes rightly sometimes wrongly you know if if if these things
00:18:16.740
about bill clinton came out and he was a president and it was now the ramifications would be far far worse
00:18:23.100
because we see it as as his behavior is as as inexcusable in a way that many people didn't back
00:18:29.280
then i think that is true on the left i mean every place left of center is a spot on the map that is
00:18:37.200
truly hostile to you know even a rumor of a rumor of an accusation of that kind but what do you make of
00:18:44.720
the fact that trump really suffers no such penalty i mean it seems like there's nothing no accusation of
00:18:52.180
that sort or any other sort that matters in his world i i make of it extreme despair it it is now
00:19:00.100
i i think it's apparent that there's no such thing as dirt on trump there is nothing he could say or do
00:19:06.440
that would cause his fans and a large majority of republican base to give up support for him i think
00:19:13.600
this is one case in which tribal loyalty dominates individual character and and in some way it's it's
00:19:21.380
entirely rational for people like you and me and you know roughly half of the country to to attack
00:19:28.680
trump and despise trump but by doing so it sets up a dynamic where anything new reported against trump
00:19:34.740
tribal loyalties kick in and you say you're attacking our guy and trump feeds off of that
00:19:40.560
so i mean look i i'm not i i don't want to come off like oh i would have predicted this all along
00:19:47.020
honestly i had thought that naively that american conservatives were actually conservative
00:19:54.740
in manners of propriety and sexuality and conduct in which case they would find trump honestly repellent
00:20:01.780
and this has been a rude awakening for me how they managed to put up with that guy
00:20:05.700
yeah not only put up with him celebrate him yeah it is an endless source of surprise that there's
00:20:11.940
any remaining capacity for surprise on this score it's just i mean just when i think he's crossed a
00:20:18.560
line that he's going to force people to defect it never happens so i mean these the the apocryphal
00:20:26.560
the the the legendary presumed tapes of him you know having bizarre sex acts with russian
00:20:33.420
prostitutes where he pees on them or has them pee on him or something these could come out be on
00:20:39.340
youtube and a front page in new york times i don't know what it would do with his support i don't know
00:20:43.660
whether whether it would cause it to to drop at all this reminds me of of other tapes that i
00:20:48.360
occasionally mention on this podcast the alleged uh apprentice the n the n-word yeah where he uses the
00:20:54.920
n-word with abandon and you know as i've said several times i know to a moral certainty that those
00:21:00.680
tapes exist i know people who have it directly from the mouth of mark burnett that they exist
00:21:06.760
and multiple people the one thing i would point out about that is that you know mark burnett is living
00:21:13.000
with the illusion that by not releasing those tapes he has done nothing presumably in his mind releasing
00:21:20.980
those tapes would be an extraordinary act you know that you would go off like a nuclear bomb and to
00:21:27.060
withhold those tapes is to take no action but i would i would say that the opposite is the case
00:21:33.060
he took an enormous action and you know act of responsibility to decide for a nation of you know
00:21:40.920
340 million people that no one could know about what this man is like behind closed doors when he had the
00:21:49.820
evidence of it and i remain somewhat hopeful this will never be confirmed or disconfirmed but i do think
00:21:56.840
that you know hearing those tapes would probably make a difference i mean it's one thing in the
00:22:02.040
abstract to know okay this is the kind of guy who probably uses the n-word without any you know
00:22:08.640
irony or or meta context you know just how he talks in private is to know that in the abstract but then
00:22:15.000
to actually hear it done over and over again with all the context and i think it would be kind of like
00:22:20.800
i don't know if you remember this the way the mark firman tapes played during the oj trial
00:22:25.320
that was the end of the end of the trial when we heard just what this guy's mind was like what do
00:22:32.260
you think i mean you think it would matter if we had you know hours of him speaking with abandon like a
00:22:37.940
member of the ku klux klan no if i if i had to guess i would say no i would say trump over and over
00:22:45.300
again trump says things and does things you know that the whole uh the whole access hollywood tape
00:22:51.380
i would have guessed in that simpler time that that would be the death of any politician
00:22:55.520
but it wasn't endless and you know you now there must be hours and hours of him saying things that
00:23:02.360
are grotesque and tweeting them in fact i actually think if if he got caught with those tapes in some
00:23:09.480
way it would be his brand you know it may be it may be more embarrassing for him if he spent you know
00:23:15.860
two hours you know rhapsodizing about how he likes you know japanese poetry and just really and he's
00:23:22.240
really he's really a cosmopolitan at heart then it's then people say what the hell right right yeah
00:23:26.860
a globalist but him saying n-word he's just he's a straight talking guy i don't know i mean there's
00:23:31.320
something there's just something so toxic about the word that i mean it has a a magical power that
00:23:37.840
you know i think no other word does in english i mean certainly in america and i mean i think
00:23:44.660
famously doesn't have the same kind of power in places like australia and you get the occasional
00:23:50.040
aussie who will use the word thinking well you know surely this is fair game to talk about the
00:23:55.220
use of the word in this context but i don't know unfortunately we will never hear those tapes
00:24:00.500
so let's go back to this the topic of moral redemption and i guess we could broaden it to moral
00:24:09.020
responsibility and forgiveness and there's also this concept of moral luck yeah which i have always
00:24:15.640
found fascinating it i think this phrase originates with um bernard williams yeah but you know thomas
00:24:22.520
nagel also wrote an essay and i think nagel's discussion of it is really the the one that i have in my head but
00:24:28.660
there's this feature of moral transgression and culpability and good and bad outcomes we have an
00:24:38.160
intuition that for a person to be truly responsible for their actions and to deserve the punishment or the
00:24:44.960
reward that comes to them it shouldn't be mostly much less entirely a matter of luck that their actions
00:24:54.040
occur in the first place right i mean it shouldn't just be this spin of a roulette wheel that gets you
00:25:00.300
put in prison with everyone thinking you deserve it or gets you celebrated as a as some kind of moral
00:25:06.980
hero but when you actually look at how events unfold there's a component of luck that you just can't
00:25:15.140
ever purge from the system and so i mean the example that comes to mind for me is a that of a drunk driver
00:25:22.000
who yeah winds up killing somebody's kid or otherwise you know causing tremendous suffering
00:25:27.940
and then you think of all the people who drive drunk who have no bad outcome they just get home safely
00:25:33.300
to their beds and sleep it off and the difference between those groups seems purely a matter of luck
00:25:42.080
and and if that example doesn't really land with people because you know most people are now
00:25:47.420
they're scrupulous enough not to drive drunk and they feel like well if you kill someone driving drunk you deserve
00:25:53.080
it well then think about texting yeah virtually everyone listening to us now will have at some point
00:26:01.520
behaved irresponsibly with their phone in their cars and some people you know more or less still committed
00:26:07.380
to doing that on a daily basis despite whatever admonishments come their way and you know texting while
00:26:14.240
driving is an unambiguously dangerous thing to do which most people get away with and yet some people
00:26:21.320
wind up killing people and go to prison for it so then the question is if the only difference between you
00:26:30.160
and the person who's now in prison for let's say 10 years for killing a child while you know glancing at
00:26:38.280
their at their phone and driving if the only difference is a matter of luck you know how do
00:26:44.000
we feel about the punishment aren't they on some level already punished enough i mean just think of
00:26:50.200
if you'd like to continue listening to this podcast you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org
00:26:58.920
you'll get access to all full-length episodes of the making sense podcast and to other subscriber only
00:27:04.280
content including bonus episodes and amas and the conversations i've been having on the waking up
00:27:09.760
app the making sense podcast is ad free and relies entirely on listener support and you can subscribe