#192 — A Conversation with Paul Bloom
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
174.83372
Summary
In this episode, I'm joined by my long-time friend and partner in social distancing, Paul Bloom, to discuss my recent decision to return to the classic coke of the old music, and the impact that has had on the culture and my relationships with friends and colleagues. We talk about why I decided to go back to the old stuff, and why I think it's the most controversial misstep I've ever taken. And we talk about how to deal with people who don't get the point of view you're trying to bring forward. It's good to be back, and I hope you enjoy it. I'll be back with a new episode next week, but for now, here's a quick update on what's going on in the world and what's happening behind the scenes. If you have a dilemma you're struggling with, or a general question you want me to answer, tweet me and I'll try my best to answer it! Timestamps: 1:00 - What do you think of the new music? 4:30 - How do you feel about the music I'm listening to right now? 6:20 - What would you change? 7:40 - What's your favorite piece of music you're listening to? 8:15 - Is it out of sync with the culture? 9:00 What do I think of it? 10:30 11:20 12:00 -- How do I feel about this? 15:30 -- What are we're taking this seriously? 16:20 -- What do we need to do? 17:15 -- What is the most important thing? 18:40 -- How does it matter to you? 19:10 -- Are we all on the other people? 21:10 22:00 | How do we take this seriously enough? 26:40 27:50 -- How can we change our minds? 29:30 | What are you think we're wrong in the public? 32:00 // Is it wrong? 35:40 | Are you wrong in a public way? 36:30 // Are we're all wrong in public or do we have a public role? 37:10 | Is there something wrong in private? 39:10 - Is this something we should be better? 40:40 // Do we have to change it?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Okay, I just want to point out that it's
00:00:24.560
taken a global emergency to cause me to change my music back to the old music. Many of you will
00:00:30.200
be relieved and considered a fair trade global pandemic for getting rid of the new music and the
00:00:36.820
newer music and reverting back to the classic coke of the old music. So apologies for the
00:00:42.860
discombobulation. We will work out our music problems as the end times proceed. But now I'm
00:00:50.100
back here with my friend and partner in social distancing, Paul Bloom. Paul, thank you for
00:00:57.300
coming back. And it's good to be back. I like the new music. I know you're getting a lot of pushback
00:01:02.460
on Twitter, but I enjoyed it. Oh yeah, the amount of hate is unbelievable. I mean, I like it too,
00:01:07.520
but even I recognize that there was a total mismatch between its upbeat vibe and some of
00:01:14.980
the topics I was beginning to cover. And I just, coronavirus aside, the idea of dropping that
00:01:20.660
music against nuclear war or child pornography or whatever else I had come in, it just seemed wrong.
00:01:27.240
So, you know, I've known you for a while and I've always wondered what you would do to cross the line
00:01:30.960
and it turned out to be the music. Yes, the most controversial misstep I've ever taken.
00:01:38.500
Yeah, I am pretty good at it at this point, I must say. It did not take long for me to snap into
00:01:47.160
gear here. And this has been such a strange experience because, I mean, everyone must be
00:01:54.260
experiencing this. At whatever point they began to take this seriously or began to notice the culture
00:02:00.480
taking this seriously, the experience for all of us is of time compressing in this amazing way where,
00:02:08.500
you know, three days, much less a week, seems like an eternity. I mean, you and I recorded our last
00:02:13.080
podcast, I think, we released it about 17 days ago on February 28th. And that now seems like a
00:02:19.260
different period in human history. I think we hardly mentioned COVID. Things have changed so quickly.
00:02:26.500
Well, I think we had recorded that podcast a few days earlier, like the 24th. For my podcast with
00:02:32.900
Nicholas Christakis, I went back and reconstructed my own psychological timeline because I was
00:02:38.400
interested to see when the dominoes began to fall for me and how out of sync I was with the culture
00:02:47.060
and with many of my friends. It was on the 27th that I just, you know, pulled the ripcord. So, you know,
00:02:53.660
it was right after we recorded that podcast. So I must have been thinking about it then. But there's so
00:02:58.600
many sources of stress here and we can talk about them. But one thing that has been personally
00:03:05.160
stressful is just to be early on this. You know, I can sort of almost set my watch by it. I've been
00:03:12.280
essentially like a week ahead of where society seems to be at. And there's something really toxic
00:03:18.960
about trying to convince the people in your life to take something that you're taking very seriously,
00:03:27.820
So do you feel that now people are on the same page as you? I mean, my sense is they're about a week ago.
00:03:33.400
So people are in all different directions. Now, for the most part, I feel everybody is taking this
00:03:38.420
extremely seriously, very worried about the Italian model, very worried about where we'll be two weeks
00:03:45.820
Well, with some very prominent and galling exceptions, there are people, you know, who privately are not
00:03:53.320
taking it seriously enough. And I'm having to essentially attempt an exorcism on their brains,
00:03:57.980
you know, just one-to-one on, you know, with a phone call. And then there are people, you know,
00:04:03.220
who have a public posture who are not taking it seriously, who I'm kind of back-channeling and
00:04:09.040
receiving a lot of pushback. I mean, in some cases, total pushback. And it's very frustrating because,
00:04:15.020
you know, some of these people have enormous public platforms and it's just socially irresponsible
00:04:20.400
not to have your facts straight at this point. And yeah, so some of this has been happening behind
00:04:26.080
the scenes. And it actually connects with a conversation you and I were having last time
00:04:31.220
around loyalty and the obligation or pseudo-obligation to treat friends differently.
00:04:38.000
I noticed that if there's someone who's wrong in public about this, who I don't have a prior
00:04:42.900
relationship with, certainly not a friendship, I'm much more disposed to just kind of message at
00:04:50.040
them, however harshly, in public. Whereas if they're already a friend, I feel like, okay,
00:04:55.960
I got to go behind the scenes and try to get them to change their minds, you know, in private and
00:05:01.060
then message something differently in public. And, you know, now that I'm confronting this
00:05:05.200
in a pretty big way, I don't actually know what the right answer is. And do you have intuitions about
00:05:10.260
that? It's a hard case. I mean, I think there's a middle ground. I mean, I've argued with friends
00:05:15.960
of mine on Twitter. I've argued with you on Twitter about issues where you could kind of intellectually
00:05:21.080
disagree. And if it's all in sort of, you know, a positive atmosphere and with respect, that's fine.
00:05:27.680
But this is a funny case because you want to be telling your friend here that he or she is doing
00:05:34.380
something seriously wrong and, you know, risking people's lives, risking people's health.
00:05:40.840
And I could understand the reluctance to do that in public. It'd be better if you could persuade them
00:05:45.820
in private. Yeah. Yeah. I've certainly made a solid attempt and come up short there for reasons
00:05:53.560
that are just completely disconcerting. I mean, I actually have no theory of mind for why certain
00:05:58.800
people don't get that this is a big deal. I mean, there are obviously some memes that are doing
00:06:04.720
real damage to people's thinking here. And maybe we should just talk about why it's hard to grasp
00:06:11.540
this problem and, you know, why it was hard to grasp it early and to change one's behavior.
00:06:17.100
I mean, there's one meme that I think has really been damaging is any analogy drawn to the flu.
00:06:23.040
You have people saying, well, the flu kills 50,000 people a year in the United States.
00:06:27.760
If we were paying attention to the flu on this kind of granular level, we'd be terrified too. We'd be in a
00:06:34.720
perpetual state of terror and no one would leave their houses and people would be insisting that
00:06:40.960
schools should be closed. But we don't do that. And we're right not to do that. So this whole
00:06:45.540
coronavirus thing is insane. And there are people who are stuck on that bad analogy who just don't
00:06:52.700
understand. I mean, yes, flu would be appropriately terrifying if every one of us were going to get
00:06:58.360
it in a single month in the United States and we were going to crash our healthcare system,
00:07:02.820
right? I mean, flu is also a big deal, but this is also by, you know, any rational estimation at this
00:07:10.500
point, considerably worse to get than the flu. Now, whether it's six times worse or 10 times worse
00:07:16.240
or 20 times worse, we don't know. But, you know, anyone who thinks that if you're under 70 or even
00:07:24.560
under 50 and have no comorbidities, you're just going to sail through this thing without a problem.
00:07:30.900
That is not what we're hearing from the front lines. And we're not even at the point now where
00:07:36.420
we're getting decent data on the lasting impairments among the people who are, quote,
00:07:42.340
recovered from this thing. I mean, there's definitely some reports of lasting lung damage and heart
00:07:47.940
damage. And so there's just no question the analogy to flu is a bad one. And yet people keep making it.
00:07:55.960
And imagine that it's true that for, imagine it turns out to be true that for young people, say
00:08:01.480
under 50, it will not cause much damage. It'll be experienced like a bad case of the flu and then
00:08:07.280
you get better. Still, it seems to be bizarrely cruel to be indifferent to the suffering of older
00:08:14.220
people. I mean, you might, you could say to somebody simply, don't you have anybody over the age of 60 who
00:08:19.680
you love, a parent, a grandparent, anybody who's, who's compromised in some way, who's not as healthy
00:08:25.600
as you, or you could simply say, don't even, you don't have to imagine whether you have somebody in
00:08:30.720
your life. Can you appreciate that these people's lives matter? And by you getting sick, even if you
00:08:35.920
yourself are willing to take on the risk, the harm you can do to other people is, should be a factor
00:08:42.280
in dictating your, your life choices? Yeah. And I think Nicholas Christakis made this point where
00:08:49.240
if only out of, you know, altruistic, positively social motives, if you just understood that you
00:08:57.960
at your age in your cohort were just destined to be a carrier of this thing, you know, you still have
00:09:03.960
to worry about, you know, every old person you are going to come in contact with. When do you decide
00:09:09.220
to behave normally around your parents or your grandparents? If you're an asymptomatic carrier,
00:09:15.120
you're just rolling the dice with them, you know, with their lives. So it's something to take
00:09:19.060
seriously, even if you were guaranteed not to suffer much from this. So you, you've been talking
00:09:24.480
to experts and actually I got to say that the episodes you had with Amesh Adalja and my friend,
00:09:29.900
Nicholas Christakis have been excellent. I am not an expert on this. I know nothing about it except for
00:09:35.060
the fact I've been reading Twitter nonstop for the last, you know, two weeks, but, but I am interested
00:09:40.920
in the psychology of these things. And there's something about this situation, which it has
00:09:47.120
certain features that make it difficult for us to appreciate. So the causality is funny. We understand
00:09:53.140
that if you are sick and you are, you are, are showing signs of disease and you make contact with me,
00:09:58.780
there's risk and I should, you know, avoid you from that. But basically the way this disease works is
00:10:04.960
you can be perfectly healthy and asymptomatic and contact with you though. It doesn't seem bad
00:10:09.640
is still bad. This disease shows signs of exponential growth and we can look to other
00:10:17.200
countries to see it happening. And that's a difficult concept for us to grasp. We look around,
00:10:21.500
we see everyone's fine. We're all kind of going to restaurants and bars and everything's fine.
00:10:26.000
This disease has no enemy. It's not as if we're dealing with a malevolent agent. We're dealing with
00:10:30.820
this sort of, you know, unfeeling, unconscious virus. And for all of these reasons, we're not
00:10:37.900
really suited to think well about it. You know, we look around, we see everyone's walking around,
00:10:42.440
people are fine. So we assume we're fine. And it's only when we reflect and we look at other countries
00:10:46.960
and we use our, you know, rational capacities, we understand the terrible risks involved.
00:10:52.120
Yeah. But conversely, I mean, this should be the easiest emergency to orient toward. First of all,
00:11:01.860
it's the easiest one to have prepared for in advance because it was guaranteed to happen.
00:11:07.820
I mean, it's literally like, you know, a tornado if you live in Tornado Alley or, you know,
00:11:12.520
an earthquake if you live in California. I mean, this is a point that Bill Gates made,
00:11:16.520
like the threat of a global pandemic that was, you know, highly contagious and, you know, lethal
00:11:23.500
enough to be of real concern, that was guaranteed to happen, right? And this is certainly not as bad
00:11:30.500
as it could be. Whatever the outcome here, literally, even if millions of people die,
00:11:35.600
this is still a dress rehearsal for something that is civilization canceling.
00:11:40.360
That's right. The guy, Adalja, when he spoke with you, kept saying, you know, this is fine. This is
00:11:45.180
not such a big deal. And he said it was clear he was comparing it to some sort of form of bird flu
00:11:50.980
that would kill 60% of people who got it and would ultimately, you know, be a species extinguishing
00:11:57.740
event. So, yeah, it could be a lot worse from that perspective. But when we knew this was going
00:12:03.620
to happen, I mean, this was not, this is not even as hypothetical or as debatable as climate change.
00:12:09.700
There's no alternate argument based on evolutionary principles that xenoviruses aren't going to jump
00:12:17.440
into our species and mutate and, in a matter of time, get worse, right? So, we just knew this was
00:12:24.160
going to happen and yet we didn't prepare. And even when it's happening and we know we are failing to
00:12:31.400
contain the spread and we're seeing this wave crash on the shores of other countries, I mean,
00:12:36.960
even looking at what's happening in Italy, you still have people here denying the reality of
00:12:43.180
this thing. And I mean, like, literally, did you see the photos from kind of the last night at Disney
00:12:50.440
Yes, I've seen Disney World. I've seen pictures of Florida beaches. I've seen, you know, wild
00:12:57.620
These are images out of a pandemic movie, right? I mean, this is like minute 33 in the pandemic
00:13:04.720
movie. You have just a crowd of doomed imbeciles just fighting their way into the magic kingdom,
00:13:14.420
So, what do you think is going on with the doomed imbeciles? Do you think it's skepticism
00:13:20.620
As I pointed out, I mean, I know some of these imbeciles. Some of them are quite smart.
00:13:24.640
Okay. So, the smart imbeciles, what's up with them? Is it that they're just natural contrarians?
00:13:29.980
Is it that they distrust what the government has to say? Is it a political thing?
00:13:35.200
I don't actually... I mean, there are certain cases where I really do not have a theory of
00:13:39.500
mind. I just think I'm stumped. But in others, you know, as this thing was gathering energy
00:13:45.740
for me in my life, and I noticed that I was out of step with the culture and with the people
00:13:52.200
around me, I noticed there was a marked difference between people who were very online and people
00:13:58.960
who were just not online at all. I mean, like, the people in my life who just have never had a
00:14:02.980
Twitter account, they have a very different information diet and a cadence of getting
00:14:09.660
information on really anything. And, you know, so some of them were just totally oblivious. I mean,
00:14:15.320
literally, I had a, you know, very close friend, very smart guy, well-educated. Basically, he thinks
00:14:21.640
he stays in touch with reality and, you know, looks at the newspaper every day. But he was aghast
00:14:28.080
when I told him that he would be canceling his travel plans at a point when I would have bet my
00:14:33.760
life he was canceling those travel plans. I mean, it's just, there was no way those plans were going
00:14:38.180
to go forward. And literally, it took like an hour of conversation and, you know, sending links and
00:14:42.840
like just trying to get into his head around this. So there are people who are not living in the year
00:14:49.760
2020 on some level with respect to information. But it also cuts both ways, because I think the
00:14:54.700
people who are very online can also get siloed into their preferred echo chamber. And, you know,
00:15:01.740
the way the variable of politics is interacting here is pretty interesting, because this is,
00:15:07.680
when you look at what was happening in Trumpistan, and on some level is still happening,
00:15:12.200
you know, among Trump's fans, they've been so confused that they didn't even change their story
00:15:16.800
once the president changed his. They seem to be denying the gravity of this, even when he's
00:15:21.760
forced to declare it's a national emergency. So it's, yeah, I think it cuts both ways. I think
00:15:28.000
people can really be confused online. But sort of in the normal course of events, I felt that
00:15:34.560
the people who were not on Twitter in particular, just were not getting up to the minute information.
00:15:40.440
And that's a factor, there's a factor which was true, you know, a couple of weeks ago,
00:15:45.220
it's no longer true, which is, it really was siloed politically, which is the liberals, you know,
00:15:50.020
were very concerned about the virus. And the fans of Trump were listening to him to say,
00:15:55.880
this is no big deal, we have it, Lick, don't worry about it. And, you know, to his, you know,
00:16:00.320
his very limited credit, he changed his story. And...
00:16:04.520
Well, I think he probably changed his story. Well, who knows? One major lever in his brain is
00:16:10.960
what happens to the stock market, obviously. So he knew he, at a certain point, he had to message
00:16:15.340
to the market. This was interesting, because this is, this is not an irrational concern. I mean,
00:16:20.840
the steel man version of the other side here is, the panic is going to do more harm than the virus.
00:16:28.340
What you don't want to do is crash the global economy, because that has all kinds of other
00:16:33.840
effects that actually do cost lives, right? People will die because the economy falls apart.
00:16:39.640
If you're going to have a virus that even in the end might kill a million people in the United
00:16:46.200
States, if you can absorb that blow without crashing the U.S. economy, that's much better
00:16:52.400
than crashing it in a panic. And I totally understand that. I mean, I've never been counseling
00:16:59.040
panic. But the problem we've faced at every moment along the way here is that in order to do something
00:17:09.100
that mitigates the problem at all, in order to do anything that flattens the curve, that spares our
00:17:15.040
healthcare system, I mean, even if all of us are destined to get this thing, if most of us can get
00:17:20.120
it once there are effective antiviral treatments, that's a completely different world. The only thing
00:17:24.940
we can do to spread this out over time and contain it at all is to practice what everyone knows now is
00:17:32.040
social distancing. But the paradox here is that in order to do the thing that will actually work
00:17:38.580
at every time point, that thing will seem unreasonable at that time point. The time you
00:17:45.440
need to close the schools is when no one you know is sick yet, right? Precisely the moment where
00:17:52.300
everyone's thinking, oh, come on, we don't even know anyone who's sick. Why close the schools? And so
00:17:57.720
it's just psychologically, it's almost a perfect exploit of our system. I mean, we just can't be
00:18:03.600
strongly motivated at a moment when the very action being counseled seems irrational.
00:18:09.860
And by all accounts, we acted too late. The United States was too late. If we acted a week earlier,
00:18:15.020
two weeks earlier, the situation would be much better coming up in the future. And, you know,
00:18:20.520
nobody knows what it's going to be like two weeks from now. But the irresponsibility of the
00:18:24.560
government in its behavior, and sometimes ongoing irresponsibility, you know, New York was very
00:18:31.120
slow to respond, for instance, at the city level, it's going to have a cost. But, you know, you're
00:18:37.520
right about, so Yale, where I teach, has gone to online teaching, and I'm scrambling to get on top of
00:18:45.420
that. And I'm doing, you know, social distancing and all that. And it's an inconvenience and it's
00:18:50.280
difficulty. But there are so many people for whom this crisis is life devastating, loss of jobs,
00:18:59.020
loss of businesses. You know, in Italy, you don't have funerals for your, you know, people die and
00:19:06.640
they can't get, they can't have funerals. There are people who are separated from their children,
00:19:10.920
from their families. There's, you know, cancellations of weddings, of critical life events.
00:19:16.120
So I think any, you and I are in some way very fortunate that we're insulated from the true
00:19:22.720
errors of this event. But this is, this is going to, this is destroying lives. And, and I just wish
00:19:31.560
we responded quicker. Yeah. And the concern about panic, there was a needle that had to be threaded
00:19:37.740
here. And we still have to thread it. And every day it becomes more important that we do it. But
00:19:44.080
it's not that we need panic, but we did need to be more alarmed than we were earlier. I mean,
00:19:53.300
the analogy I, it comes to mind here is really to wearing a seatbelt. Like, I find that, you know,
00:19:59.640
my anxiety around this pandemic is always at the boundary between where I'm either trying to convince
00:20:06.800
someone that they should take it seriously, or trying to figure out what I and my people in my family
00:20:12.820
in my immediate circle should actually do practically. But once you've figured out what
00:20:17.820
you should do, then there's, there's no need for anxiety anymore. You can dial the anxiety all the
00:20:23.220
way down because it serves no purpose, but it really does serve a purpose when you need to be
00:20:29.100
motivated to figure something out. And so like, for me, it's like in the time when seatbelts were just
00:20:36.160
being adopted, right? And people had to be convinced to wear them and they didn't like them and
00:20:40.520
they wanted to feel, you know, free in the car and they didn't like the feeling of confinement.
00:20:45.040
And I'm sure there were all of these idiotic conversations where, in fact, there was one
00:20:49.300
person in my life about 20 years ago, very close friend, still is a, one of my best friends who did
00:20:55.220
not wear a seatbelt, right? And this is like in the nineties, he was not wearing a seatbelt. He was
00:21:00.280
just a real outlier in my life. I could never convince him to wear a seatbelt. There was no argument
00:21:05.960
that would work. And then he flipped his car and got needlessly injured. Perhaps he would have
00:21:11.600
gotten injured anyway, but he, you know, he was not wearing a seatbelt and he, you can picture what,
00:21:16.020
what a car rolling over does to you when you're, you know, free to bounce around in it. And he
00:21:21.060
recovered from his injuries, which is great, but he, he was injured enough to reflect on the
00:21:26.800
implications of being loose in a car at speed. So now, you know, ever after has worn a seatbelt.
00:21:31.260
So there are some people who actually do need to be shown the horrific pictures of car accidents,
00:21:40.060
right? I mean, to get motivated to wear a seatbelt. But once you're motivated, once you understand
00:21:44.900
the utility, none of us have to feel anxiety when we get behind the wheel of a car to motivate us
00:21:52.420
to clip in our seatbelt. That gesture now is an automaticity. And I think the same can be true of
00:21:59.820
a response to a crisis like this. I mean, once you figure out what you should do, well, then you can
00:22:05.740
just do that thing. And all this ambient anxiety can be dialed down, but it's totally appropriate
00:22:11.460
to feel it when you're just basically uncertain about what you should do. And you get, you have
00:22:16.260
mixed messages and, and you can't get, you know, your friends and family on the same page. Anyway,
00:22:20.840
that's how I see it. So I mean, I think, you know, anxiety, you know, continuous anxiety is
00:22:24.940
obviously counterproductive. And we have a significant mental health challenge on our hands
00:22:30.600
when you have anxious people living in isolation and watching the stock market bounce around and
00:22:37.680
unable to work. Virus aside, this would be a very big deal for society.
00:22:43.860
Yeah, people seeing their life savings drop and drop and drop and drop. And of course, things,
00:22:48.420
things are happening very quickly. I mean, I'm in Toronto now, and Canadian prime minister a few
00:22:53.460
hours ago announced that Canada would basically be closing its doors to anybody who wasn't Canadian
00:22:58.200
or for a short period, American. And so, you know, what governments do and how they respond and what
00:23:06.900
the restrictions will be on your behavior is a constant source of anxiety. How long this will
00:23:11.300
last? I mean, in some way, you're right from a sort of, I don't know, the Buddhist perspective that
00:23:16.680
once a decision has been made, there's no point to being anxious. Yet, nonetheless, you know,
00:23:22.760
it's an anxious time. There's another aspect to this, by the way, you mentioned threading the
00:23:27.460
needle. Neither one of us is a fan of Donald Trump. And initially, what he did was he seemed,
00:23:34.880
you know, relatively indifferent and unconcerned about the crisis. But there's another way I always
00:23:39.500
worried he might go. And it wouldn't surprise me if he goes this way in the future, which is to rampant
00:23:45.760
xenophobia, directing hatred against foreigners, against immigrants, and so on. And besides being,
00:23:53.460
you know, morally terrible, this will make the crisis worse. If people, for instance, if illegal
00:23:59.680
immigrants, or even, you know, legal immigrants don't have access to health care, are afraid to
00:24:07.500
enter the system, the situation will get much worse and not better.
00:24:11.280
Yeah, I guess I don't really see the basis for that. Because, you know, if anything,
00:24:15.240
Mexico should be trying to keep us out, right? I mean, once the scope of this contagion becomes
00:24:22.220
more obvious, it won't seem like this is, you know, coming from Asia, or I mean, it's now we think it's
00:24:28.740
from Trump's point of view, it's more coming from Europe, right? So it's really just, it's a human
00:24:34.600
problem. I don't see how he gets, well, I'll tell you what, in the future, an appropriate demand
00:24:41.100
which could well be spun as xenophobic, but shouldn't be, will be a demand on China to close
00:24:49.680
down these wet markets, because they actually are akin to bioterrorism. It's negligence that is so
00:24:58.500
obscene that it is almost an act of war. I mean, they are spawning these viruses. Anyone who's
00:25:04.600
playing with a bat in one hand and a duck in the other is just a fucking terrorist at this point.
00:25:11.100
Whether they know it or not. So we have to clamp down on that. And I got to assume the Chinese
00:25:17.680
government will, for all their authoritarian charm, they will see the wisdom of doing that. And it
00:25:24.180
almost doesn't matter how they do it, right? It's like, whoever's insisting that they need to play
00:25:28.200
with bats needs to be dealt with in China. Okay, well, no argument there. But I'm not as confident
00:25:35.180
as you that Trump can't figure out a way to make use of this crisis.
00:25:40.080
I certainly think he can make use of it in some horrible way. In fact, there's some report that he
00:25:45.780
was trying to get a German drug manufacturer to move to the U.S. to produce a vaccine exclusively for
00:25:52.860
the U.S. Even for Trump, that seems so... I read the same reports. It seems so cartoonishly evil.
00:25:58.520
Yes, I know. That only we would have the vaccine. It's like supervillain evil.
00:26:02.980
And I'm going to be skeptical about that. But it wouldn't surprise me if Trump just used this for
00:26:08.500
more build-the-wall rhetoric, even though blaming Mexico for this is bizarre. But it wouldn't surprise
00:26:15.980
me. Obviously, there's some data on how unlikely we are to be able to contain the spread of a virus
00:26:23.880
by stopping travel. But insofar as we have better information, it seems to me, that does become more
00:26:31.120
and more plausible. I think internationally, we do need to be agile on that front. And without any
00:26:38.700
imputation of xenophobia, we just have to say, okay, no flights for 10 days. Let's see what the hell's
00:26:45.020
going on in that country of yours. So that was the one move he made, which was, I believe, spun as
00:26:51.140
xenophobic initially when he made it, although some of the spin turned out to be false memes
00:26:57.400
circulated on Twitter. I think there was a fake tweet from Chuck Schumer saying that this is more
00:27:02.420
racism from Trump. But I did support him canceling the flights from China, just on the assumption that
00:27:08.280
it might work. Now, it obviously didn't. And the rest of his messaging was so appalling and insane
00:27:14.860
that he did much more damage than one might expect.
00:27:18.580
No, I could see in the future Trump exploiting this, but I don't think travel restrictions to date
00:27:24.520
have been particularly xenophobic. You know, like I just said, Justin Trudeau is doing the same thing
00:27:29.220
for Canada, actually much stricter than what the United States has. And, you know, nobody sees this as a
00:27:34.860
xenophobic move. It's just designed to reduce spread. And so I've heard talk that there may be some
00:27:42.680
domestic travel restrictions in the United States. It's a possibility. And it's not clear that's a bad
00:27:49.320
No, no. I mean, the painful reality of this is that this is a massive coordination problem. If we could
00:27:57.020
all just agree to stay home for something like three weeks, we could actually extinguish this thing.
00:28:05.100
I mean, leave aside, I guess it's possible that people who already have it could be contagious for much
00:28:11.480
longer than we might fear. I mean, I guess that's possible. You know, I don't think we understand the
00:28:16.980
disease enough now to rule that out. But, you know, assuming this acts like many other viruses,
00:28:23.900
we could just all hole up for three weeks and have this burn itself out. And yet we seem absolutely
00:28:31.240
incapable of doing that. And for that reason, who knows when life returns to normal and at what cost.
00:28:37.440
And the terrifying thing could be in two weeks, three weeks, we could be Italy. We could have our
00:28:42.480
hospitals overrun and people could be dying for lack of medical care. So that's the big worry.
00:28:49.440
Yeah. And that's barring some fairly heroic social distancing. I think that it's reasonable to expect
00:28:57.300
that at this point. So I mean, certainly in parts of the U.S., I mean, in major cities,
00:29:03.400
we've all learned a lot in the last few weeks. I mean, I had no idea that we only had 2.8 hospital
00:29:09.760
beds for every thousand people in this country. And it's actually much lower than other countries.
00:29:14.680
And it's much lower than Italy, for instance. And the fact that our hospitals already function at 65%
00:29:20.400
capacity, it would be great if at tolerable cost, we learned every actionable lesson to learn from this.
00:29:28.700
Just imagine actually becoming more robust in the face of pandemic as a result of this and realizing
00:29:36.520
that our healthcare system needs to be reformulated. And I mean, there's so many things that are kind
00:29:41.380
of breaking through now, universal basic income, universal healthcare. It's just...
00:29:46.700
Mitt Romney just suggested sending a check to every American.
00:29:49.180
And it's not a bad idea. I think it's much better, much more effective and much, much
00:29:55.500
better than some sort of tax fiddling. Because if you send a check to every American, it'll mean more
00:30:01.100
to poor Americans and rich Americans. While if you do stuff with the payroll tax, it has the opposite
00:30:06.940
Yeah. Except I don't see in this case how it truly reboots the economy. Because if we're avoiding
00:30:14.300
a potentially lethal virus and are wise to, and therefore don't want to go to restaurants,
00:30:21.060
just giving people money to go to restaurants is not going to get them to go to restaurants.
00:30:25.540
So the restaurant business is going to suffer no matter how big that check is, except for it'll
00:30:32.360
help the people who are not working at their restaurant jobs.
00:30:38.500
So in some way, you've answered a question I was going to ask you, which is, it's been going
00:30:42.680
around Twitter, people have been asking each other, so what are the positive effects of this
00:30:47.140
event, assuming we make it through? And one answer you gave, which I think is the immediate answer
00:30:52.300
and is the right answer, is that it's a dress rehearsal for the next one, which could be much
00:30:57.420
more serious. So we could go through some difficult times, but if we learn from it and know how to
00:31:02.100
respond intelligently and appropriately and prepare, then when the next bird flu comes,
00:31:08.880
we could be prepared. So that would be a plus side.
00:31:13.420
Yeah. Well, there are many, personally and collectively. Just collectively, this is a wake-up
00:31:20.960
call on so many fronts. I mean, the idea that we don't want expertise anymore, right? The idea that
00:31:26.560
we can just wing it with a reality TV show star and his buddies in charge of everything. You have to
00:31:33.160
imagine many people for whom the downside there was just an abstraction. Many, many people are tired
00:31:40.460
of winning, I would say, at this point. And just take specific examples like, you know, the anti-vax
00:31:48.060
movement, right? I mean, just think of how nice it would be to have a vaccine for coronavirus right
00:31:55.920
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I don't know which has been harmed more, the cruise ship industry or the anti-vax
00:32:01.300
movement. And I don't know which recovers first, but that argument is over, right? And, you know,
00:32:06.600
it should be felt to be over. And the indecency of it when it resurfaces should carry more opprobrium
00:32:14.160
than it has in the past. But also just understanding that there are problems we have that are global
00:32:20.480
in scale for which there really is only a global solution. We can't be America first for global
00:32:27.060
problems. And that lesson has to become indelible. The flip side of this epiphany, however, is that
00:32:34.320
given how hard we've found it to be to convince ourselves that this pandemic that is just crashing
00:32:43.120
down on us is worth paying attention to, I don't know how we get our heads straight around climate
00:32:49.940
change. Just imagine if this were climate change, right? And you had reports out of Italy that climate
00:32:57.440
change has arrived and the hospitals are full and they're having to triage patients and deciding whether
00:33:04.180
a 45-year-old with two kids should live over a 55-year-old with three kids. And that's all due to
00:33:10.940
climate change. And, you know, we can track its progress across the Atlantic and it's coming to
00:33:17.740
New York and we still can't decide whether to pay attention to it. That's the situation we're in
00:33:24.560
right now. And yet, you know, climate change is this multi-year, multi-decade abstraction.
00:33:31.820
If our psychologies are unprepared to deal with this, as they seem to be, at least in part,
00:33:36.540
they are grossly unprepared for climate change. Because, you know, here we have to be able to
00:33:41.180
think forward to two weeks and see, here's who we'll be in two weeks if we don't act.
00:33:47.400
You know, for climate change, I mean, it's 20 years, 10 years, 20 years. And it's difficult.
00:33:53.120
It's a difficult coordination problem. There's this line that I think Ronald Reagan was actually
00:33:58.360
the first to say, but it's sort of a standard social psychology thing, which is what will bring
00:34:02.580
the world together as, you know, alien invasion. Aliens attack, we'd all come together, we'd have
00:34:08.200
a common enemy. And, you know, that might be right. There's some, you know, social psychology
00:34:14.680
work suggesting a common enemy really does bring people together. But I don't think the virus cuts
00:34:20.560
it. It doesn't seem to be having that effect. And climate change doesn't cut it either. I think
00:34:25.320
the common enemy actually really has to be an enemy, something, an intelligent, malevolent creature
00:34:30.600
we could fight against. These causal properties of biology and physics don't seem to inspire us in
00:34:39.740
the same way. Yeah. The time course is really hard to get your mind around when you think about a
00:34:44.800
slower moving problem than this and our inability to be motivated by it. That's pretty sobering.
00:34:50.960
That's a nice way to put it. It's too slow moving. It's too slow moving. And again, I think,
00:34:57.360
put it this way, I think the people, whoever coined the term, the war on cancer, was kind of a genius.
00:35:04.820
Wars motivate us. Wars excite us. Wars drive us. And that's a useful metaphor. Now, it's not as
00:35:14.300
simple as say, let's have the war on, you know, COVID-19. But if we could think more that way,
00:35:19.600
we'd probably respond better. Whatever the remedy is here, it's going to be recognizing once and for
00:35:28.720
all how the free market is not optimizing for responsiveness to certain enormous problems,
00:35:37.320
right? And the fact that we were noticing that our supply of mission-critical things is running low
00:35:44.140
already, right? I mean, just the ventilators. We're not going to have enough ventilators,
00:35:48.280
right? And we get all of our drugs from China, right? I mean, just imagine somebody was,
00:35:53.860
we don't happen to be at war with China at the moment, but someone drew the analogy to, you know,
00:35:58.740
just imagine if we outsource the production of all of our bullets, you know, all of our ammunition to
00:36:05.280
China, right? And then we get into a war with China and we expect them to supply us with rounds for
00:36:09.980
our guns. I mean, it's just ridiculous that we don't have the infrastructure to produce specific
00:36:16.560
life-saving things that we know we're going to need. So we have to figure that out. And the idea
00:36:21.740
that we don't want big government meddling in our lives at these points is just insane. I mean,
00:36:27.900
so the libertarian fan fiction that everyone has been reading in Silicon Valley for the last
00:36:34.300
30 years, right? You know, all the devotees of Ayn Rand have to ream this out of their heads. You
00:36:40.980
need a government big enough to handle problems like this. And... Pandemics turn us all into socialists.
00:36:47.160
Yeah. Yeah. You know, and I've actually seen, I've seen some people on Twitter who are
00:36:51.500
pretty libertarian and everything in there. This is, this is, this has been a...
00:36:57.380
If you'd like to continue listening to this podcast, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org.
00:37:03.000
There you'll find our private RSS feed to add to your favorite podcatcher, along with other
00:37:07.840
subscriber-only content, including bonus episodes and AMAs and the conversations I've been having
00:37:13.440
on the Waking Up app. As always, I never want money to be the reason why someone can't get access to the
00:37:18.300
podcast. So if you can't afford a subscription, there's an option at samharris.org to request a free
00:37:23.800
account. And we grant 100% of those requests, no questions asked. The Making Sense podcast is ad-free
00:37:30.520
and relies entirely on listener support. And you can subscribe now at samharris.org.