#195 — Social Cohesion is Everything
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 8 minutes
Words per Minute
171.54266
Summary
General Shanley McCarrystal and his colleague, Chris Fussell, discuss their experiences in responding to the 9/11 pandemic and the lessons they learned along the way. They discuss the failure to respond to the initial pandemic, the problem of misinformation, the consequences of dishonesty from the government, the prospects of a nationwide lockdown, the trade-off between personal freedom and safety, the possible threat of tyranny, concerns about the global supply chain, and the price of oil going too low, the safeguarding of the 2020 presidential election, and other topics. This episode was produced and edited by Sam Harris and features an introduction to the Making Sense Podcast by me, the host of the podcast "Making Sense" and the founder of the MCCRYstal Group Leadership Institute, Dr. Shanley Mcarrystal, and a discussion of the pandemic's impact on the military and civilian response to it, the dangers it posed, and what we can do to prepare for it in the event of another pandemic like it, in this episode of the making sense podcast. Thank you to everyone who is working to keep us all safe, and who are risking their lives to make a difference in the world, and to all those who are making a difference by providing support in our daily lives. I hope you're all making sense of it all. -Sam Harris Make sense? "Making sense" - Cheers, Jon Sorrentino -- Jonos and - in the Making sense? Sam "The Making Sense" -- Jonos, . The Making Sense -- Jono Tim (Jonos, Jonos , Jon , John ? Jonathan ) Cheers Jonos is a regular contributor to the podcast, -- and Jonos' blog Chris is Dr. , and Jono's podcast Ron Ronald ... And Jonos's blog, Jono s Chris Mark Evan Chad : & Jonos ( ) and Jon ...and Jonos s ... and Jon s . . Jon's blog is , Jonos has a blog post about the Pandemic, and his book, The Pandemic What's the point of this podcast?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
welcome to the making sense podcast this is sam harris okay well
00:00:28.080
been locked down for about a month here a little over a month on my side this is an increasingly
00:00:35.500
surreal experience anyway i hope you're all staying reasonably sane and healthy i just want
00:00:44.040
to express my gratitude for all of you who can't actually lock down because you're serving some
00:00:51.620
essential function in society health care workers frontline responders those of you who are working
00:00:59.500
in the supply chain delivering packages and food working in markets and pharmacies we're all
00:01:06.640
incredibly lucky to have you and totally dependent on you so thank you for what you're doing
00:01:12.820
this episode of the podcast is yet another psa i think i've had four or five of those in a row
00:01:20.580
so you will not hit a paywall here anything on the pandemic we're putting out in its entirety
00:01:26.740
but just to remind you if you care about getting all of my podcast content the only way to actually
00:01:33.500
do that is to subscribe at samharris.org and also apologies for the sound in this episode it's been
00:01:42.120
my general practice of late to bring people into studios and record them professionally the pandemic
00:01:49.040
has made that impossible we've been sending people microphones so they can record from home but we
00:01:55.340
can't control all the variables in their environment and how all that works out so you'll hear some
00:02:01.000
strange acoustics for one of our speakers today you'll get used to it it's by no means terrible
00:02:06.960
i actually had a podcast recorded a few days before this that we can't release because the audio was
00:02:14.260
that bad one can never be entirely sure what one's going to get under these conditions but today's
00:02:20.620
episode is perfectly fine albeit not perfect okay today i'm speaking with general stanley mccrystal
00:02:29.500
and his colleague chris fussell general mccrystal retired from the u.s army as a four-star general
00:02:35.380
after more than 34 years of service and his last assignment was as the commander of all american and
00:02:41.720
coalition forces in afghanistan he has written several books one of which is a memoir titled
00:02:48.220
my share of the task which was a new york times bestseller he's also a senior fellow at yale
00:02:54.220
university's jackson institute for global affairs and he's the founder of the mccrystal group leadership
00:03:00.260
institute and his colleague on today's episode is chris fussell chris is a partner of the mccrystal
00:03:06.260
group and he's the co-author with stan of team of teams which was also a new york times bestseller
00:03:13.760
chris was a commissioned naval officer and he spent 15 years in the navy seals in various points around
00:03:20.480
the globe he also served as the aide to camp to general mccrystal during his final year commanding
00:03:27.200
the joint special operations task force fighting al-qaeda chris is also on the board of directors of the
00:03:33.360
navy seal foundation and he's a member of the council on foreign relations and he also teaches
00:03:38.360
at the jackson institute at yale university and in this podcast we focus on the covet 19 pandemic
00:03:44.720
we discuss our initial mistakes in responding to it the nature of the ongoing crisis the threat of a
00:03:52.200
breakdown in social order the problem of misinformation the consequences of dishonesty
00:03:58.860
from the government the prospects of a nationwide lockdown the trade-off between personal freedom
00:04:06.340
and safety the possible threat of tyranny concerns about the global supply chain and the price of oil
00:04:14.640
going too low the safeguarding of the 2020 presidential election and other topics so without further delay
00:04:26.340
i am here with general stan mccrystal and chris fussell guys thanks for joining me thanks for having
00:04:37.920
us so um stan i will i will drop the general for our conversation but obviously it's a great pleasure
00:04:44.820
to get you on here given your your expertise and you don't need much of an introduction i will have given
00:04:50.320
you one in my opening remarks but perhaps both of you can summarize your experience here that seems
00:04:56.680
relevant to the conversation we're about to have sure i'll start and chris and i shared a lot of it
00:05:02.360
i spent a career in the military but really starting in 2003 when i took command of joint special
00:05:08.640
operations command america's counter-terrorist forces we were mostly focused in iraq but actually spread
00:05:15.400
across the entire mid-east against al-qaeda and eventually against al-qaeda in iraq which emerged
00:05:21.760
starting in 2003 and what happened was we were a purpose-built counter-terrorist force for precision
00:05:29.040
almost elegantly precise operations but not on a very high tempo then we ran into this new entity al-qaeda
00:05:37.680
in iraq that was amorphous viral-like entity that was opportunistic it was wickedly fast it learned
00:05:46.220
constantly adapt adapted to the conditions everywhere it was and it was really lethal and for about two
00:05:52.940
years they were defeating us no matter what we did they were just a different threat that we weren't
00:06:00.020
ready for so what we did is in the middle of the fight we transformed the organization not as much
00:06:06.160
organizationally as culturally we moved to a distributed operation where we operated from 76
00:06:12.180
different bases simultaneously we had to synchronize ourselves every 24 hours because that was the pace
00:06:18.620
of the war we had to change the mindset of how operations were conceived and approved we had to push
00:06:25.380
approval way down close to people close to the action and yet we all had to stay collaborative so that
00:06:33.380
we had a common picture a common shared consciousness of what was happening it feels an
00:06:39.240
awful lot like what is happening with covet 19 right now and so my background really that's the time when
00:06:46.400
my beliefs on leadership started to shift pretty dramatically and then in 2010 when i retired we
00:06:53.460
founded the mccrystal group on the hypothesis that our experience was not really unique to war or
00:07:00.200
counterterrorism it was to the age of complexity and speed which has changed the environment we operate
00:07:06.020
in and sam i joined the military the navy in the late 90s i went straight into the seal teams and spent
00:07:13.480
about a little over 15 years there in that community and in 2003 went through the selection to become part of
00:07:21.580
the counterterrorism task force that stan mccrystal would oversee for about five years during the really the
00:07:27.440
peak years of transforming that organization from top down and linear into distributed network model
00:07:33.940
and so for a few years got to see it on the on the front edge you know forces on the ground outposts
00:07:40.280
around around the world around the fight then spent a year on stan's staff as his aide to camp sort of like
00:07:46.860
a chief of staff you'd find in the civilian world and got to see that from the strategic level watching how
00:07:52.720
really a global enterprise had transformed the way it communicated decentralized decisions i'd been on
00:07:58.700
the receiving end of that but then got to see it from behind the scenes got deeply interested in the
00:08:04.980
network methodology that is again so so pertinent today as well went on to study that in grad school
00:08:10.720
went back to my seal command for for a few more years and then in 2012 came here to be part partnered
00:08:16.880
with stan ever since that time nice nice well so there are many ways we could have this conversation
00:08:25.040
i mean so your expertise with respect to distributed organizations and the resilience that one has to
00:08:32.620
build in by organizing in new new ways that obviously has a there's a positive side to that i mean you're
00:08:39.120
learning from having bumped up against terrorist organizations but all of this is relevant for how
00:08:45.040
businesses now need to proceed under these new and highly disruptive conditions so we can talk about
00:08:52.320
what people can do and should do in the business community to to make themselves more resilient
00:08:58.580
but i want us to focus on the ways in which our fairly inept response thus far to the pandemic in
00:09:07.160
particular in the united states could i don't know if you share that judgment i would love to get your
00:09:12.200
take on just how you think our response has gone so far but however well or ineptly we respond there
00:09:20.060
are downside risks to i mean virus aside an economic collapse that we all need to be mindful of and in
00:09:29.100
particular i'm concerned about social cohesion and again this could be a generic conversation for
00:09:35.740
some future pandemic right let's say this is a covet 19 is a dress rehearsal for something much worse
00:09:42.340
i want to get a sense from you guys about what you're thinking about and watching for and worrying
00:09:49.560
about and the kinds of advice you know you would be giving to the government and to businesses and
00:09:55.800
individuals in light of the the possible knock-on effects of what is on one level an epidemiological
00:10:02.860
problem and on another you know quickly growing and economic one absolutely and sam what i'll do is
00:10:10.360
i'll start and frame up what i think the situation has evolved to and then pass it to chris because
00:10:15.980
he and i've spent a lot of time talking about the social cohesion part if we think about the threat
00:10:20.960
right now this amorphous viral frightening threat of a pandemic mixed with literally a shutdown or a
00:10:30.860
seizing up of the world's economy on a short-term basis has us frightened by something we can't
00:10:37.000
touch or feel but we know is deadly and it also has us terrified because our economic well-being
00:10:42.940
our security of our future is in doubt if we look at the united states as the pandemic started to appear
00:10:51.360
first in china and then little places elsewhere our first response was not to be as candid with the
00:10:57.980
american people as we should have been and i think several things came out of that by not laying out
00:11:04.260
the situation very clearly like a leader at the beginning of a war might do we created misperceptions
00:11:11.780
about the level of threat and the level of activity that would be needed to defeat this maybe that was to
00:11:17.080
make people feel better in the moment but the reality is what it did was it caused a lot of organizations
00:11:22.480
to be slower to respond than they needed to be as we did that and we reacted slowly we started to
00:11:31.160
suddenly see the effects of the virus on the united states which of course accelerated the economic
00:11:37.400
shutdown and then what we've been doing since is largely fighting this as 50 separate state battles
00:11:44.760
as though each state and really each municipality is on their own to fight this virus but the very
00:11:52.760
nature of an opportunistic threat like this is that you must be united if you want to win a war the way
00:12:00.280
you do it is you break your enemy into pieces and then you defeat them in detail if you want to lose a
00:12:06.220
war you do the opposite you get divided up and then each organization is trying to defend itself and they
00:12:12.500
can't so what we've done is we've set up a mindset in the united states that says to a degree every man
00:12:20.060
and woman for themselves and you know i break that to the state or municipal level when they lack the
00:12:27.660
confidence the expertise the resources to do that then suddenly you see society under pressure but it's
00:12:34.220
not linked arms let me pass to chris because that pressure can produce some frightening effects yeah
00:12:40.980
maybe starting at a pretty high level of what we've seen in other parts of the world that we may think we're
00:12:49.760
far away from but in reality this is part of our sort of human dna the tribalism sort of local focus that can
00:12:56.860
kick in as we start to lose the those things that we take for granted that do keep us cohesive enough so that you
00:13:04.360
don't separate as a society there's a there's a thing called the social cohesion cohesion curve
00:13:10.100
that i'm a big believer in it's just a simple sort of x y axis that says you have a everywhere if a
00:13:16.880
country is not you know in civil war it has it's crossed some level to maintain sort of daily peace
00:13:23.460
around society some of that you get for free based on the sort of the homogeneity and the similarities
00:13:29.740
inside the so think like norway for example would be pretty high just on the natural level of cohesion
00:13:35.400
and then you have to you have to cover the difference with sort of rule of of law and order
00:13:40.500
and and sometimes if that natural order is pretty low like we found in a place like iraq for example
00:13:46.720
from the outside pre-2003 it looks like okay this is a relatively stable place the natural cohesion
00:13:53.460
was much lower than we would have assumed and saddam hussein and the baithist had covered the gap with
00:13:58.880
all sorts of massive suppression behind the scenes violence some of which we knew about but some of
00:14:03.540
which we didn't right and so when that gets removed and the baithists get removed then suddenly that gap
00:14:08.440
is wide open and that tribalism kicks in very quickly and you know in a matter of months society
00:14:14.320
decayed into civil war and then it comes al-qaeda and throws a grenade in the middle of it right so
00:14:19.460
that and we've seen that other places in that afghanistan when the taliban came in and separated the
00:14:26.480
society through a very very violent methodology obviously but turned what you know just 15 years
00:14:33.240
prior had been a vacation mecca post-soviet and warlord situation where the violence was untenable
00:14:40.920
the taliban then separates people down to the lowest and isolated level and we've it'll be generations if
00:14:48.380
that's ever able to recover to the afghanistan once new balkanization in the 90s etc etc so we've seen
00:14:55.020
examples of this we have to be uh and to stan's point as things get separated down to the state
00:15:01.580
and local level that will further decay potentially down into socioeconomic lines some of which you
00:15:06.720
already seem to start to trickle up in the news whether it's between health care food shortages those
00:15:11.240
sorts of things there's there's a real potential under the surface that we can fractionalize i think
00:15:19.320
we're we're far distance from sort of levels of violence we've seen in other places but the social
00:15:25.320
repair in an already very polarized society could take much longer than we imagine it would if we
00:15:31.960
don't get aggressive right now as leaders at every level to keep those communities states etc tied
00:15:38.860
together under some some common banner right well so i think many people listening to this conversation
00:15:44.920
will find it frankly alarming that i'm even inclined to talk to two military guys however well qualified
00:15:55.960
and view the current situation through that lens to talk about the possibility of a breakdown in social
00:16:03.720
order is to paint an unnecessarily scary picture and there's just something inflammatory about even
00:16:09.960
entertaining this possibility but i think one lesson to draw from this experience is you know if you
00:16:18.120
haven't thought about how quickly the world can change and once it changes there is this kind of
00:16:24.920
ratcheting effect where you it seems to move in one direction and it's very hard to get it to move
00:16:30.140
back to where you came from you're not drawing the obvious lesson most of humanity at this point is
00:16:36.080
now told to stay home and various places are enforcing that recommendation with greater lesser heavy-handedness
00:16:46.020
and it really seems to me fairly obvious that if our response to the economic emergency isn't really
00:16:55.000
effective we run a risk of many things going haywire that again this is standing completely aside from the
00:17:05.200
very obvious stressor of the epidemic which could break our health care system and make this parallel
00:17:11.360
theme of tragedy just what is beginning to happen economically poses a threat of of a breakdown in social
00:17:18.740
order so i just want to frame this discussion by saying that i'm not expecting a breakdown in social order but it just it would seem
00:17:27.860
irresponsible to not have experts of your sort at least talk us through the kinds of things we should be
00:17:36.240
looking for responding to preempting in advance i'll give you one example so like in los angeles it was just
00:17:43.900
recently advertised that some very nice stores on rodeo drive and beverly hills had boarded up their windows with
00:17:51.980
plywood obviously anticipating the problem of looting and when i saw that on the one hand that could you
00:17:59.320
could interpret that as a signal of you know heightened risk or but you know conversely it's also just a
00:18:05.760
message sent to it's almost like broken windows policing running in reverse it's just a bad message of
00:18:12.820
social distrust sent to all of society but when you start to see things like that i see it kind of
00:18:21.380
unraveling beginning which we should want to figure out how to arrest and you know the other rumors that
00:18:30.160
i don't know if this is official but i have this unfairly good authority that police departments are
00:18:34.340
policing quite differently now because they don't want to be up close and personal with people when they
00:18:38.280
don't have to they don't want to be putting people into jails where this contagion could be exploding
00:18:42.600
the courts they're not impaneling juries our justice system is grinding to a halt as well and
00:18:49.920
therefore there are crimes that are not being prosecuted and crimes that are not being even
00:18:54.660
responded to at the level of policing so i mean this is the kind of thing that again is moving in the
00:19:01.140
wrong direction when you're talking about social order so i just wanted to put that out to both of you
00:19:06.200
and i think it's only responsible for leaders at every level to recognize you know what what is
00:19:12.180
similar about a current problem or crisis and what's different and there are variables here that
00:19:16.500
we've never we've never dealt with we've certainly seen you know natural disaster hurricane sandy type
00:19:22.540
stuff that's when the gritty nature of our society comes out but the variable that's different there is
00:19:28.660
and we we all love seeing this right neighbors support neighbors they come out they rebuild a house
00:19:33.820
they they go to the hospital and volunteer their time etc we can't do that in this situation
00:19:38.400
like it only makes the problem worse if you try to play to your you know your your strongest side of
00:19:44.500
your nature and help one another out so we have to separate and that adds fuel potentially to to the
00:19:50.580
fire that you're you're talking about and i think one of the things in a good way you know like i like to
00:19:58.340
say society is the thing you don't notice it lives in the background if you live in a good society right
00:20:02.840
but if you've been to places where that was the truth and then very quickly it's not the truth
00:20:07.220
my first experience with this was pre-2001 spending time in croatia training with units there and got to
00:20:14.200
be good friends with a croatian their special operations units and an officer there who had been
00:20:19.780
married to a serbian woman they still were and when the war started they had 12 hours to make a decision
00:20:25.460
were they going to go back to her village or were they going to stay in croatia they decided to stay in croatia
00:20:29.340
and he told me this whole story as we got to know each other his unit went back and fought in the
00:20:33.960
village where his wife was from and his children's grandparents had lived there and then it happened
00:20:39.320
in a matter of you know 18 24 months and lasted a generation right and and there that was a level
00:20:46.440
of intermarrying common language common culture that would have seemed absolutely seamless to an
00:20:51.720
outsider and so yeah you have to think through how we you can fight it you can get ahead of it but
00:20:57.000
leaders have to be very deliberate about how are we going to hold these social ties during together
00:21:01.620
together when we're when we have to be physically apart yeah i just want to echo the point you made
00:21:07.700
about how bizarre and unnatural this problem is and this is not at all like any other sort of natural
00:21:15.940
disaster because keeping people apart is the the first and only remedy at this moment and that's the
00:21:23.800
antithesis of all of the ethical and political silver linings societies can tend to find when
00:21:32.320
everyone has to respond to a crisis it really is almost engineered for a bad outcome so how do you think
00:21:42.260
we should be messaging around this because one of the the things that is especially insidious about
00:21:50.260
the current crisis is there's a political overlay to everything or at least people have to burn a lot
00:21:57.960
of fuel trying to fight themselves free of it and so the messaging around this being a problem is you
00:22:05.720
know balkanized with respect to politics you know there are many people who for the longest time seem
00:22:11.820
to think this was all a hoax it's a media-driven narrative designed to harm the president's re-election
00:22:19.380
prospects and many people seem to have recovered from that but certainly not everybody and i don't
00:22:26.400
know how much time you guys spend on social media but i'm encountering you know pizzagate level conspiracy
00:22:32.660
theories around basic terrestrial facts of epidemiology and it's it's pretty weird out there
00:22:39.500
in the information space we can take any piece of this you want but just in terms of what is being
00:22:45.080
communicated how it's being communicated how we get on the same page with respect to this now two crises
00:22:52.020
again covid and the economy what are your thoughts there let me start first with the idea of what
00:22:59.500
keeps people believing and operating according to the rules of a society and i think it's based on
00:23:05.660
confidence you know the value of money is based on the confidence that someone else will accept that
00:23:11.240
money for for what you need the reason many people follow laws is because they believe there's a law
00:23:17.960
and order system that it's in their interest to follow laws because other people will then as well
00:23:23.160
once you start to have a dearth of information if we did a thought experiment we said covid 19 was
00:23:29.480
approaching and suddenly all digital communications were cut off television phones everything
00:23:35.860
suddenly people would fill their heads with whatever the idea of the potential threat is you know we
00:23:43.520
already see hoarding we see increased sales of firearms recently during this and that's that is those
00:23:50.940
are glimmers of people losing confidence that the system is going to work so now if you say well we
00:23:57.940
haven't lost all communications but our communications have become corrupted they've been corrupted by politics
00:24:03.380
and they've been corrupted by dishonesty as well people just putting absolute disinformation out
00:24:08.240
and so people start to discount the truth they start to act in a way that that says i am i'm not confident
00:24:19.640
that society is going to work in the way that it was advertised and that i experienced before and so now
00:24:25.600
i've got to draw into my tribal group whether it's my family or or religion or race or whatever it is
00:24:33.380
draw together which causes society to atomize more you see that whenever a society is under huge
00:24:40.760
pressure again we saw it in iraq you see it during riots where people sort of go to the place they feel
00:24:45.900
safest but a modern society can't function that way very long because our systems are built on
00:24:52.120
things having to connect deliveries having to be made for supply chain for food that the delivery of
00:24:59.420
services i think it's a more fragile apparatus infrastructure than we sometimes think it is and that's why i think the
00:25:08.240
importance of really clear accurate information to build people's confidence it may not be the story that they want it
00:25:16.840
may be paint a pretty challenging picture but the accuracy is essential because people make decisions based upon their
00:25:25.060
perceptions and people will again they'll as we'd say they'll go high right and and sort of drift out of
00:25:32.700
where common sense should take them and that really threatens society
00:25:36.880
that's something i've worried about frankly ever since trump became president because whatever you may
00:25:45.860
you know one may like or not like about him i think it is uncontroversial to say that his relationship
00:25:53.580
to the truth to a truly fact-based discussion about anything is about as precarious as we have ever seen
00:26:01.180
in not just politics really just anywhere in public life i'm sure there are still people out there who will
00:26:08.300
not admit that the president lies to an unnatural degree but it's objectively true to say that he does
00:26:16.160
right that's not a partisan statement and i've always viewed this as just a horrific liability because if we
00:26:24.160
have someone who will lie reflexively even when it doesn't serve his interests he will contradict himself
00:26:32.980
in a way that certainly doesn't make him look good and there's no apparent advantage and he does it
00:26:38.580
just relentlessly and with a velocity that we've never seen before and it's sort of good fun when
00:26:46.140
you're when there's nothing at stake and the dow is hitting 30 000 and we're not in a war and everyone
00:26:53.600
in trump's base can just laugh that he's winding up the libtards but now we really need leadership and we
00:27:02.140
really need to be able to trust the information we're getting from the white house and you know
00:27:08.920
honestly it just seems like something that cannot be corrected for apart from the experts with their
00:27:15.180
own reputations to maintain however difficult that project is messaging around him you know whether
00:27:22.020
they're standing within six feet of him or not there's no way that trump becomes someone who can
00:27:28.320
actually be trusted not to shade the truth i know you guys have a it's somewhat taboo for you to
00:27:35.320
strike what seems to be a hard political note one way or the other but i'm just wondering what your
00:27:40.700
your senses of that and and what to do in light of that because to my eye and you know at least 60
00:27:48.280
percent of the country's eye this is a man who will lie about anything all the time for reasons far less
00:27:54.920
grave than the kinds of reasons he's confronting now so how do we reboot from there i think there's
00:28:01.840
two ways to to tackle that even trying to to stay uh you know this thing as it turns into a political
00:28:08.840
conversation that it only exacerbates some of the problems that that run against logic right people
00:28:14.240
just saying well i'm on this side therefore i believe or don't believe in in epidemiologists right
00:28:19.340
yeah yeah let me just respond to that concern just to try to close the door to there because
00:28:26.080
it really is not a political point i'm making i mean i would never say this about someone like
00:28:31.140
mit romney right this is not an anti-republican point and it's just not political to point out
00:28:37.040
that someone is not speaking factually and is either ignorant of certain facts or consciously
00:28:42.980
misrepresenting them and you just you can catch trump doing that so often that i mean you can set
00:28:49.580
your watch by it and again that's just not i don't view that as a partisan statement although it will be
00:28:54.100
heard as a partisan statement by the president's defenders i hear you making it as you often do it
00:29:00.040
a sound argument about the importance of verifiable truth and that's more important now than than ever
00:29:06.360
one of the things there's kind of there's two two thoughts that that teases up one is at what level
00:29:12.580
would this be fought and i'll i'll turn that over to stan and sort of because this is exactly what he
00:29:17.340
had to do inside of our force to fight a distributed problem right governors and mayors and local leaders
00:29:22.520
are now our new frontline you know colonels the other though is the interplay between these types of
00:29:28.900
systems and this is one that stan i've been staring at this problem for 20 years um and so it's just
00:29:33.960
painfully obvious when you see it happening the the way that a traditional top-down system works and if
00:29:41.400
if you have a very sort of corner office bureaucratic leader who always wants to receive information and
00:29:47.740
walk out and and share it as his or her own which is not uncommon in big big enterprise government
00:29:53.580
military etc that tendency trickles down very quickly and the whole system will snap into that sort of
00:29:59.300
behavior and it's the exact opposite of what you need to do when you're fighting a network spread
00:30:03.940
networks and traditional bureaucracies or hierarchies are or their governing dynamics are
00:30:09.520
fundamentally opposite right one only cares about how how quick can i grow and i'm going to find new
00:30:16.580
opportunity wherever it exists that's how al-qaeda spread and that's how this is spreading obviously
00:30:21.420
different different problems but the variables that allow them to do that in a interconnected world are
00:30:26.260
very similar and so if you are a leader like if stan mccrystal had rolled into the the joint
00:30:32.540
counterterrorism community and said i want to know everything and then i'll tell you what to do next
00:30:36.540
we would have done every single thing we did correctly and we would have gotten praise for it
00:30:41.120
and we would have been orders of magnitude too slow to keep up with the problem we'd have fought a bunch
00:30:45.520
of localized fights all looked good in our own little world and the problem would have spread
00:30:49.940
multiple times faster than we could keep up with it and the real problem is if you had a caustic
00:30:55.340
leader sitting on top of the system like that he could have said well all the other things happening
00:30:59.180
aren't my problem because everything i say to do gets done right so my units are are great this is
00:31:03.960
everybody else's problem so that at every level these two stack up against each other in in opposite
00:31:11.160
and very dangerous ways leaders in this sort of situation need to quickly create the copper wire for
00:31:18.420
connectivity get ground truth because that's where the truth sits up and through the system and then be
00:31:25.280
the ultimate network connector and say i don't i don't know the answers this is changing too fast
00:31:29.380
but i bet the mayor in this city has a good some good insights what does she know what can we learn
00:31:35.000
from it and how quickly can others be informed by that so i just want to be the the network conduit
00:31:40.960
and i will never be able to walk out on stage and look like the brilliant know-it-all like i could
00:31:45.480
have in a traditional hierarchical model and that's a hard behavior for leaders to shift towards so
00:31:52.060
that's that's one there's not a solution there that's highlighting the problem of the balance in
00:31:57.020
those those personalities i think the thing that i had hoped for 20 years ago was that the wikipedia
00:32:04.260
effect would bring truth out and so i really sort of had a pollyanna view that said if you get enough
00:32:11.760
sources in unfettered from providing ground truth that the truth would win out because it's the truth
00:32:18.680
that has not proven correct so far and so one of the dangerous parts about this is because that's
00:32:26.380
not proven true if you look at our political environment people discount everybody i had a
00:32:32.600
pretty intelligent friend of mine the other day say that he was not happy with what the president
00:32:40.200
said but he thought that all politicians lie so what the president says doesn't matter
00:32:46.480
right and we've discounted it and then there's the idea that all news media is flawed and so we've
00:32:55.380
discounted all sources of information that that we used to be reliant on it really does matter how you
00:33:03.000
respond to an error right so like you know when the new york times makes a mistake you know if they
00:33:10.000
doubled down on it every time it was pointed out well then they're just torching their reputation
00:33:16.460
and it doesn't take too much of that before you've made what many perceive to be an unrecoverable
00:33:22.980
error and so insofar as they're they're reliable channels of information and unreliable ones it
00:33:28.580
really does often come down to what any organization or any individual does when it becomes clear that
00:33:37.480
they made a mistake but one of the things that's so toxic about our information ecosystem right now is
00:33:45.080
because everyone can essentially silo themselves without even knowing they're doing it but everyone
00:33:50.520
can create enough of an echo chamber based on the kinds of news they like to hear it just seems that
00:33:58.220
many people become unreachable right there's always a conspiratorial rejoinder to a fact that is
00:34:05.180
impossible to assimilate within your cherished conspiracy theory or worldview and people can just stay
00:34:13.000
stuck there and then you're then you're dealing with people who for whom the sky is the limit based
00:34:18.480
on allegations of the most insane intent behind any i mean like you know i'm talking to people
00:34:25.720
not publicly at the moment but privately but people who have immense social media platforms who think
00:34:33.080
that the problem is all made up that covid 19 is not even as bad as the flu and that all the noise
00:34:42.720
we're hearing from hospitals and governors is just an attempt to get more money out of the federal
00:34:49.540
government that is perhaps married to some kind of social panic and there's literally no there there
00:34:57.440
we're going to wake up and realize that basically only 75 year olds died from covid 19 and there were
00:35:04.920
most of them were going to die anyway from other conditions i'm talking about people have millions of
00:35:10.120
followers on twitter and they're messaging this kind of contrarian attitude with respect to this
00:35:16.980
that is it's incredibly harmful and one irony here is that this has hit the blue counties first
00:35:24.140
i.e the big cities and so it's only now beginning to make itself known in rural america and throughout
00:35:32.680
the south and and we're just at the beginning of this thing both epidemiologically and economically
00:35:39.260
where do you think this goes once the difference between new york city and every other place in the
00:35:46.540
country is no longer so stark you know it's i'm trying to as you're talking trying to there's some
00:35:52.280
parallels to the tribal viewpoints that that we experienced in previous life with the al-qaeda
00:36:00.920
fight that i think may start to manifest here and there's a there's a glimmer of hope here as well
00:36:07.400
one of the things we found again back to this interplay of traditional systems and and and networks
00:36:13.480
that really have no emotion they just want to get big fast one of the ways that'll play out is we'll pat
00:36:18.920
ourselves in the back for seeing our numbers go down in uh new york which is the the end product
00:36:24.780
of you know people literally putting their lives on the line and working around the clock that's a
00:36:28.860
good story covet doesn't care it's just going to leave that very hard access point and go somewhere
00:36:34.920
else it'll drift into these other communities as you're as you're laying out so that's not that's not
00:36:39.900
up to us what you what when we went into that fight we all showed up with our our organizational
00:36:45.760
biases which are similar in some ways to these political lines geographic lines etc that are going
00:36:51.920
to be a challenge here so if i came from this started inside the military units i came from the seal teams
00:36:57.260
and i had grown up in a culture that said we don't get along with this army unit or that unit over
00:37:03.020
there etc etc and you don't know better you just grow up believing that to be the truth and it
00:37:07.640
that's based on sort of cultural lore and they thought the same thing in reverse right so as
00:37:12.360
as we got distributed one of the first things that mccrystal did was we're going to send you out
00:37:18.480
closest to the fight and we got in these small pockets next to each other we you know when the
00:37:22.980
bullets are flying those old sort of cultural biases go out the window pretty quickly right so you
00:37:28.100
figure out a way to become a cohesive team on the ground there were certainly some forcing functions
00:37:32.420
and that that was not a flick of the switch once that started to take hold inside these very very alpha
00:37:38.460
military units and you know those personalities sam you spend time around those that part of the
00:37:44.320
military then it was able to expand out into civilian organizations as well so we had a collective bias
00:37:50.320
against intelligence organizations or against diplomatic organizations etc etc and as these members of those
00:37:58.040
different tribes clustered in small groups close to the fight we used to call it the star wars bar right
00:38:03.720
you walked in and it was all different colored aliens but we were we were locked in one localized fight
00:38:08.360
which made it very serious and and traditional tribal norms could be overcome by sort of a common bond on
00:38:15.640
solving your local issue then when those networks were tied together into a bigger system you started to get
00:38:21.560
ground truth right and you got a clear picture across these boundaries that had an interagency feel to
00:38:28.240
them because those local groups that said look we're all on the same page here's why we're interpreting
00:38:32.660
this and then you connect that around the world and the leaders were given an honest picture of what was
00:38:37.660
happening inside this network threat and of course that goes back to the previous discussion it was
00:38:42.900
dependent on leaders that were really willing to put in place a network methodology that allowed and in fact
00:38:50.480
forced the sort of you know truth to power sort of paradigm that everybody likes to talk about but it's
00:38:56.180
very very hard to put in place they created a system very deliberately where those closest to the fight
00:39:02.060
had a daily platform where they could talk about what was happening and at a certain point
00:39:06.880
that no one could deny that truth the problem's bigger here it's shrinking here we need helicopters over
00:39:12.820
here we need predator assets to go to the north and those were decisions that were coming up from the
00:39:17.920
ground based on that interagency cross tribal boundary realistic picture we can do the same thing here
00:39:24.920
it's those local leaders creating a network connection model between mayors hospital systems first
00:39:32.320
responder governors even so that they can become the ground eye view and truth if they're given the
00:39:39.680
platform that can become a very very powerful tool but it that will take intentionality and all of us will
00:39:46.060
default to my down and in view just like i would have been the seal teams i wasn't going to suddenly
00:39:51.380
say i'm going to forego all of my seal team tribal norms walk across the street and try to become
00:39:58.040
buddies with this army ranger over here because my tribe would have said what the heck are you doing
00:40:01.800
right we had a we had leadership on top of us that said this is the only way we win and i'm going to
00:40:06.900
put forcing functions in place and and make you all get along and i i believe there was no sort of book
00:40:13.060
written about this beforehand i believe that will make us as interconnected as this al-qaeda threat
00:40:18.100
and the same thing i think can hold true here what do you think the prospects are that we'll have a
00:40:24.680
national lockdown i i think it's inevitable i think it'll be late to need but at a certain point what
00:40:32.720
we've seen so far is instead of being ahead of the problem we're we are responding as a nation
00:40:39.760
to sort of that you know the uh the facts being right in front of us and and having to do it and so
00:40:47.580
i think a national lockdown comes pretty soon i'm not sure how much it will have cost us to be this late
00:40:55.000
but i'm but i believe it's significant and this opens the door to another strand of concerns which
00:41:04.580
is the the ways in which arguably a necessary response to a a biological and economic emergency
00:41:12.720
can be viewed as the the aggregation of power and even the looming threat of tyranny right so it will
00:41:21.220
have a government that by definition will have more and more power both overt which is in this case
00:41:31.740
imposing a lockdown and you know how it's imposed the details there will matter but also just we're
00:41:38.820
seeing really a hunger for increased surveillance right we want to be able to track the spread of this
00:41:45.940
thing we want to be able to track the efficacy of social distancing most people will have seen the
00:41:50.740
video of all those cell phones leaving the beach in fort lauderdale and spreading out throughout the
00:41:56.540
country and these are now digital surveillance tools that the government will have more and more access to
00:42:02.020
and on some level we have a a scared population that will be eager to give away its privacy and some
00:42:11.560
amount of freedom with both hands if it could possibly do some good here and again this is more of a
00:42:19.080
ratcheting effect where you know you keep turning the wheel in one direction and it becomes or one
00:42:25.000
could fear that it becomes very difficult to turn it back and to reset so how do you think about the
00:42:31.640
threat of tyranny or the perceived threat of tyranny as we enact a more comprehensive response to the
00:42:39.320
problem yeah sam i'm not as worried about it as some people are if you go back in our history
00:42:45.640
we've always imposed measures we had to whether it's passports to get in and out of the nation
00:42:51.940
whether it is tsa to protect airlines from terrorism whether it's things we do it policing
00:43:00.440
wise just to to make sure that people are safe on the streets i think every nation the society makes a
00:43:07.840
trade-off between certain personal freedoms and then what's what's needed to keep the society from
00:43:14.240
destroying itself i think the technology has been growing so it just makes it easier to have
00:43:20.240
surveillance cameras or cell phone tracking or any number of these things and i think society
00:43:25.380
will make decisions it will like it has with the use of mobile devices many of us have traded off a lot
00:43:34.040
of our security for convenience and i think people will be only too happy to trade off some of their
00:43:41.340
convenience for you know security from a pandemic or other threats so i don't think it'll it'll be as
00:43:51.180
bad as we think in fact i think the population will sign up for it pretty easily i think we'll have to
00:43:57.220
keep watching it because the problem is it tends to get ahead of us now the technology what we can do
00:44:04.060
with cell phones what we can do with tracking is more than the average person appreciates so they will
00:44:09.320
have given up more of their personal privacy than than they know and so we do need to watch that if
00:44:16.440
you watch what not just is being done by governments but what's being done by marketers
00:44:20.680
what's being done by political campaigns you know there's an extraordinary ability to target voters or
00:44:27.000
customers or whatever using data that most of us don't really think about when we log into a website or
00:44:35.320
or use our cell phone i would um build on that just a little bit sam the had a conversation before this
00:44:43.000
all hit with a few folks in in your world just around the idea that this concept of being unknown
00:44:56.440
right is is really a a unique on the grand scope of history my sense of individual autonomy and and
00:45:04.520
people not knowing what i'm up to is maybe going to be just this brief cute little moment of a hundred
00:45:12.200
years or so because if you think about you know in in a tribal culture obviously everybody knows
00:45:17.160
everybody that's how you survive even going back just to my grandparent generation growing up in small
00:45:22.920
town everyone was in your business all the time it's only in recent history that you've been able
00:45:27.960
able to move away you know being from middle class community you could you could go to school you get
00:45:34.600
a job in a city where no one knows you and you can great create a sense of autonomy and independence and
00:45:39.880
and you can choose how known you are to that local community technology has already usurped that
00:45:45.080
right and this may be the wake-up call that says no to stan's point collectively we're going to trade
00:45:51.320
off that that sense of autonomy for collective protection like we've done throughout the vast
00:45:58.280
99.9 of our of our history and i think there this will be as all the on the back side of this all the
00:46:05.480
data that will be collected the arguments will be quite sound to be able to trace this sort of thing
00:46:10.040
and to your earlier point i know you've discussed this with others on your show this probably is the
00:46:15.720
warm-up right anyone that knows this space far better than than we do will say yeah this is this is
00:46:20.360
this is round one this is the easy warning for what could happen down the road and so those things
00:46:25.400
should couple together and we will learn out of this probably hey the only one of the ways we have
00:46:31.640
to uh position ourselves to be ready for this when it when it's a 40 kill rate and a easier transfer
00:46:38.040
methodology is to sacrifice some of these liberties right the knock-on effects of that's a long
00:46:44.200
conversation but we're going to be having this conversation pretty quickly yeah that's one thing
00:46:49.720
to be hoped for if it's possible to learn these lessons so clearly that we could have a kind of
00:46:57.000
turnkey solution to the next pandemic because it it really does seem like this isn't the last time
00:47:04.280
we're going to be faced with something for which we have zero immunity and as you say it could be much
00:47:09.800
worse and a national or global shelter in place order could be responded to with with real alacrity
00:47:18.920
and something like finesse if we just knew how we unrolled it everyone understood the need for it
00:47:27.240
and we know how to stall our economy and then to restart it and we know how much money to pump in or
00:47:34.760
what percentage of gdp to pump in and it just it seems like there's a machine the workings of which
00:47:40.200
we're understanding more and more and now we're you know we're stress testing it but again the leadership
00:47:45.880
has been such and the public debate about in many cases undebatable facts has been such that it's not
00:47:52.840
yet inspiring much confidence that we're learning the lessons in a way that'll be indelible
00:47:57.880
yeah but it it's an interesting thing to to to consider sort of the guns of august uh argument
00:48:04.840
in the in the military we always fighting the last thing because it was so hard you learn the wrong
00:48:07.960
lessons for the next war there wasn't a uh there wasn't an easier al-qaeda that was fought before
00:48:14.440
this this generation right and it it learns and it grows etc if there is a bigger thing on the
00:48:19.880
backside of that of this that could come in 10 years sometime in our lifetime or certainly probably
00:48:26.360
waves of this current one one of the things we are trying to talk very directly with leaders
00:48:31.800
across all different parts of industry and government etc is everybody gets a pass right
00:48:35.720
now because we're all trying to figure this out we need to move faster no one gets a pass in the fall
00:48:39.800
no one gets a pass in the spring and certainly as a society we don't get another pass on this once
00:48:44.760
we figure this one out exactly like you're saying what are the what are the things we have to have in
00:48:49.000
our routine to be able to go in and out of this if it happens again in five years or if it happens again in
00:48:54.760
the fall and so a lot of leaders understandably organizations are thinking how do i get through
00:49:00.200
this quarter that's that's fine we got to you know baseline ourselves but how do i create the
00:49:06.120
organization of the future that's going to be able to survive through these things or the nation of the
00:49:09.640
future that can deal with this sort of pandemic when it's even worse and it could be orders of magnitude
00:49:14.200
worse how do you guys think about the tension between what is rational for individuals or even
00:49:21.400
individual businesses to do versus what is collectively beneficial i mean there are zero-sum or apparent
00:49:30.760
zero-sum trade-offs here i mean take something like you know whether to buy ppe right you know the
00:49:37.480
hoarding of masks or anything else the hoarding of food being early to stock up and you know how
00:49:44.120
much to stock up when if there's a run on the market or a run on the bank or run on anything
00:49:49.320
you know you get this breakdown of the system and supply chain and in many cases a breakdown of
00:49:56.520
confidence in our our institutions and and norms and you're obviously there are kind of tipping points
00:50:02.360
there where those tensions can be resolved up until the point and then then you've got people boarding up
00:50:09.000
their windows and trying to sell thousands of bottles of purel out of public storage and then
00:50:15.400
being vilified online for it how do you think about those trade-offs between the the individual and and
00:50:21.480
the group i think it's when you lose confidence that society is going to work in your favor and our
00:50:28.760
collective favor that law and order that supply chains are going to work then you start to have the case
00:50:34.200
where people or small groups are incentivized to do what's best for them because the good of the
00:50:39.240
society no longer applies to them i don't think it would take very much to see that behavior kick up
00:50:46.040
more than we have we've seen some hoarding and things we've seen a couple of communities that i read
00:50:51.560
about basically say we don't want any outsiders coming in i could see three weeks from now small towns
00:50:59.320
with checkpoints outside the towns with people with shotguns saying no strangers can come through
00:51:05.320
these checkpoints into our town and from their standpoint it would look like very rational behavior
00:51:13.240
from anything six months if we went back six months and we predicted this kind of thing we'd say it was
00:51:20.040
sort of a post-apocalyptic zombie land behavior but but i can see that happening and people justifying to
00:51:27.160
themselves that in that particular case it works the problem is the more those things happen the
00:51:31.880
more it speeds up the deterioration of society the more you break things apart the less this globalized
00:51:39.400
system we've created works and a lot of people aren't fully appreciating the fact that there are so
00:51:46.360
many things that are not built not only in their neighborhood but not in their country that they rely on every
00:51:51.800
day that suddenly you say now wait a minute it's in our interest for the global structure to be
00:51:57.240
healthy and to work and in fact it could be to our demise if it doesn't so i think that we we need
00:52:04.520
to spend time educating people on that because if you have a simplistic view you take simple actions
00:52:12.600
yeah one of one of the things that i've heard stan say quite frequently over the last few weeks
00:52:17.160
is to to leaders who have not just industry leaders but any any leaders that sit on top of these
00:52:23.880
networks that keep society together it's time to activate the network how do i think about that and
00:52:29.880
the obvious ones i'm a mayor of a town i'm a i'm a governor etc city manager but there are all these these
00:52:37.160
super nodes inside community networks that we we take for granted because they're just in the background
00:52:41.880
right my school principal my church leader my community group leadership etc any that localized
00:52:50.120
space those leaders there they can be a real part of the solution but it's a new sort of challenge for
00:52:55.720
them so i i'm sure this is happening everywhere across the country but the the school system will say
00:53:00.600
okay we're we're we're at home for the rest of the year we're going to hand out school packets three times
00:53:06.440
a week we're going to do site skype calls so it turns into the kids involved through digital
00:53:12.120
platforms with their teacher but those principals sit on top of these especially in a place like like
00:53:17.160
dc or other larger cities very diverse adult communities and we see each other in passing at
00:53:24.360
the school our kids are on the playground together etc there's a social cohesion that comes from that
00:53:29.160
that could be gone for six 12 months we don't we don't know yet how long and when we couple it with
00:53:36.440
the problems that could be on the back side of this you know i live in in the middle of dc my kid
00:53:41.800
goes to a school with with other kids who i know are know their parents because we spend time after
00:53:46.680
school together some of those kids live in food deserts on the other side of the city when there
00:53:50.200
are shortages that are impacting those communities and the tethers between the adult population have
00:53:55.320
been separated because we're so isolated then you you add in one more risky variable to how
00:54:01.000
you know society can start to unwind in a very unfavorable way so who are those local
00:54:06.280
leaders it might seem unnatural for a principal to step in and say you know what every two weeks
00:54:11.160
i'm going to do a skype call with all the parents in my school because i want them to hear from each
00:54:15.000
other i want it i want those ties to stay in place that's never been part of their job description
00:54:19.640
but those are those invisible networks that we have to find ways to keep strong
00:54:24.120
because we don't know how long this is going to last yeah what what are your
00:54:26.920
expectations there on the time front how long are you preparing yourself for it to last yeah we've
00:54:35.640
talked a fair amount about it i think we're going to see the effects of covet 19 directly meaning waves
00:54:41.560
of of it into uh 2021 probably into the spring of 2021 i think that as society gets a little more
00:54:50.280
prepared for it each time that each one will be a little bit less impactful on us we'll be better
00:54:56.920
at at doing certain things but i think that the requirement to separate is probably likely again
00:55:02.360
in the fall and maybe again in the winter or early spring which is going to affect the economy so i think
00:55:09.480
if we think in that kind of a time horizon we need to think about solutions that are not you know
00:55:15.880
everybody cocooned in their home for two weeks and then we emerge and it's all well i think we're
00:55:20.520
going to have to make organizations work you know the distributed work environment for not just a few
00:55:26.920
but for most organizations are going to have to work we're going to have to figure out how we take care of
00:55:32.680
those people who have to be out physically doing it not just first responders but people in the
00:55:37.480
supply chain and things like that we're going to have to think through those because there's not an
00:55:42.600
alternative we have got to keep those fundamental wheels of society turning and you know i i can
00:55:50.520
remember from the the al-qaeda fight the last time i had a a finish line in my head was the when we were
00:55:59.400
chasing abu musab al-zarkawi in in iraq who was the first you know really well-known leader of aqi
00:56:06.760
al-qaeda 2.0 he was sort of innovative etc and we all and i can remember having these
00:56:12.120
conversations i happened to be forward deployed during that that time window and we knew we were
00:56:17.240
close and the thinking was this will be the finish line when we when we get him this war will start
00:56:22.840
to wind down and we got him and within two three days everybody realized oh wait a second that
00:56:30.280
wasn't a finish line there there's there is no finish line in this thing this is a new type of
00:56:33.880
threat have you met abu bakar al-bagdadi yeah and and because you realize this is an ideology that
00:56:39.480
exists in networks and it will just continue to thrive so our challenge then was a it was a wake
00:56:45.080
up call but b how do we redesign ourselves and of course this is what our leadership have been saying
00:56:48.840
to us for a while uh we're just a little thick-headed at least i was how do we redesign ourselves to be
00:56:53.640
able to survive through these this much longer unending generational infinite war that a network
00:57:00.280
wants to fight and if you if you take it with a rigid we're going to be done by x date then you're
00:57:06.360
only setting yourself up for frustration and probably failure what lesson do you draw around
00:57:13.480
our dependency on a global supply chain here because many people were frankly astonished at how
00:57:23.000
thin our supply was on many fronts i think that the ppe issue has been the most galling for people i
00:57:30.040
mean just the idea that we could so quickly run out of masks and that many of them need to be
00:57:36.040
produced in china and china having the same problem and then when you overlay the prospect of being in
00:57:42.760
conflict with a country like china and you recognize that our most of our medication is coming either in
00:57:50.040
whole or in part is coming from china and india it's just you know one person drew the analogy of
00:57:56.600
outsourcing our ammunition to china knowing full well that we could one day be in a shooting war with them
00:58:03.240
but we're expecting them to supply us with bullets what lesson do you draw about what we actually
00:58:10.840
need to take in-house for emergencies of this kind yeah i think that one thing is the interdependencies
00:58:18.520
between countries are grossly under miss or under miss or misunderstood because as you say there we may say
00:58:29.320
okay we're going to make all of our weapons here all of our ammunition here all of our key things
00:58:34.280
but then you find that key you know basic materials or components of those are required and like we found
00:58:42.440
in our medical supply chain we have interdependencies this came from a focus on trying to be as efficient
00:58:48.760
as possible to reduce our costs as much as possible and if you go to the you know the doctrine of free
00:58:55.640
trade it makes sense people should do that part of economic activity for which they are best suited
00:59:01.800
but it does create this mutual dependency that we are dependent upon the supply chain there and they
00:59:07.400
are dependent upon us for many things therefore you've got to decide whether that's acceptable whether
00:59:14.120
they are a reliable enough partner both politically medically militarily for us to to do that and
00:59:22.360
that's a consciousness that i think america has lacked for quite a while i i think we just don't have a
00:59:30.600
sense for just how many things we don't either make or the raw materials we don't produce yeah it seems like
00:59:40.040
there should just be a comprehensive inventory of everything we wish we had in the current circumstance and
00:59:46.280
didn't and then figure out why that was the case and and also just figure out what the government can
00:59:52.920
only do effectively it just seems like the free market incentives for many of these things are just
00:59:59.080
never going to be there and so recognizing that an ability to produce an antiviral that if all goes well
01:00:07.880
only a tiny percentage of us need to use once in our lives the market doesn't incentivize investing
01:00:16.120
billions of dollars in that but clearly that's the kind of thing we need in these circumstances i don't
01:00:21.960
know if you have thoughts about the division of labor between government and private industry there
01:00:26.360
yeah it said if you go to just medical capability governor cuomo gave a great sort of primer on this the
01:00:34.520
other day and he described we have a privatized hospital system and all of those hospitals can't
01:00:42.360
afford to keep beds that they don't need so they they very carefully calculate what they need and so we
01:00:48.520
don't have excess capacity the military has to have a certain amount of excess capacity like you see with
01:00:54.200
the hospital ships and then field hospitals that they can put up but they have to be prepared for
01:00:59.880
conflict and sudden casualties but the rest of our system just isn't built that way and so when we
01:01:05.560
suddenly want to to have this surge capability we don't have it i think that's a national decision
01:01:12.280
the night the nation has to decide how much surge capability do we want to maintain either keeping
01:01:18.040
mothballs or we'd have to subsidize hospitals to keep it ready yeah and and obviously all the other
01:01:25.720
emergencies and potential emergencies that the world can throw at us have not been canceled just because
01:01:34.600
all of our attention is on this one how do you see the the risks we're running on other fronts yeah i
01:01:41.800
you know i think we've been running this risk for a few years here in in united states for sure in
01:01:47.800
our sort of echo chambers preoccupation which is fast news cycle etc and at strategic costs right and we
01:01:55.560
we've seen examples of that with russia and other other actors that are had been done some pretty
01:02:00.520
sophisticated stuff over the last three four years this is um back to our earlier discussion
01:02:06.920
one of the new variables here that could be proven wrong here but certainly not in my lifetime has
01:02:11.640
there ever been a single story that the whole world's talking about this is literally the only
01:02:16.680
thing any outlet is talking about anywhere in the world right now there may be an exception out
01:02:21.000
there but it's just blanketed right and so those sophisticated actors all the way down to you know
01:02:26.520
violent groups that most folks have never heard of they know when they have a smoke cover right and i am
01:02:32.600
sure that this is being taken advantage of by really bad actors all over the world not just nation state
01:02:38.920
players but localized problems where you know in countries that we would normally pay attention to and
01:02:44.200
be able to put pressure on and use diplomatic uh leverage etc etc that that they know that their
01:02:50.840
actions won't break through no one will care and if it doesn't get into the the media cycle they can
01:02:55.560
get away with whatever with whatever they want that could be violence that could be you know whatever
01:02:59.400
their what their intent is and so it will take us a lot a lot of that will never be unwound but i'm
01:03:05.880
i am willing to bet that some of the stories that will come out of what happened during this blanket
01:03:10.680
coverage will be there'll be some heartbreaking stories in there and some strategic ground that
01:03:17.160
we will have a real challenge ahead of us to make up so everything from the strategic level all the
01:03:23.080
way down to the local sam i would add there's some destabilizing factors that are likely to be
01:03:29.000
second and third order effects the one that jumps out most is the price of oil you know we were
01:03:35.560
already moving away from oil into renewables which i think was a good thing but many economies in the
01:03:43.080
world to include ours to a degree are based on a stable price of oil much higher than it is right
01:03:49.240
now and i think there's every chance that the price of oil could drop down below twenty dollars a
01:03:54.280
barrel if it goes there then many nations aren't economically viable anymore and so their entire economic
01:04:03.080
model is upended and so you almost have to have instability followed from that
01:04:09.720
throw on top of that less mature medical systems and they get hit with covet 19 so you have this
01:04:16.440
combination of factors that produces instability which whenever you have instability nowadays in the
01:04:23.400
world you can export it whether you're trying to export it or not so i think that's just a couple of
01:04:28.840
examples of things that could easily happen in the pretty near future so i know you guys are running
01:04:34.760
out of time over there so i'll bring it into the end zone here do you have any special concerns about
01:04:40.040
the election in november because i mean just on its face asking everyone to turn up and vote in person
01:04:48.200
seems epidemiologically unwise and it would be very easy to see in the paranoid fantasies of his
01:04:56.040
detractors a a concern that trump could just decide you know it's not safe to hold an election i don't
01:05:02.600
know what the constitutionality of that would be but how haywire could the uh presidential election go
01:05:11.640
if covet is still surging on all fronts at that point yeah i think first an election is critical i think
01:05:20.120
for lots of reasons but particularly in the united states right now a presidential election is critical
01:05:24.760
i also think that it's entirely within the capacity for us to go without having to go
01:05:31.560
physically to polling booths i think we've got the ability to trans transition to vote by mail where
01:05:38.120
necessary but vote digitally otherwise there would be growing pains in it but i think we could have
01:05:44.360
already started making that transition i think we also could take a great step forward toward decreasing
01:05:50.840
voter suppression that way there are lots of things i think that technology could help us do this could
01:05:57.240
be the forcing function for us to take it on i'm worried that we can do it fast enough for november
01:06:02.680
but i think we need to make that effort we talk about social unrest or social cohesion i think if this
01:06:09.400
election is not conducted then i think that will be an additional pressure for part of the population
01:06:15.560
with a sense that they have been uh disenfranchised yeah it's just the concern about a hacking of a
01:06:23.160
digital election is so excruciating at the moment and the the crisis of legitimacy that would follow if
01:06:30.680
there was any doubt as to whether or not the result was really the the real result it's hard to see how
01:06:36.280
we get away from paper on some level well i don't think that it could be executed flawlessly and still
01:06:43.400
undermined in the echo chamber world right um which is the real it's it's part of parcel of the core of
01:06:49.160
the problem but i would say it's sort of the dna of of growing up in the world that that we did
01:06:55.480
fighting these complex fights you're you're always sort of manically nervous about the second ridge line
01:07:00.120
out and it makes me nervous that we're not talking at the national level about what this will look like
01:07:06.680
in the fall like there needs to be a plan in place that we're considering and debating right now
01:07:12.440
assume the worst in the fall and don't try to solve it in in october right we need to get ahead
01:07:17.480
of this right now and start warning the american people and prepping for it well um i want to thank
01:07:22.200
you both for the the work you have been doing for many years and the work you'll continue to do
01:07:28.280
it's been great to get your expertise here on the podcast is there any place you would point people
01:07:33.400
if they want to follow your work and understand what you're doing with businesses and
01:07:37.800
give us the relevant websites and social media handles sure all of our stuff is hung on our
01:07:43.800
our corporate website mccrystalgroup.com or team of teams is the first book we wrote together a few
01:07:49.880
years back that's a great primer on sort of theory the case that what we experienced over overseas and
01:07:56.120
then you know quick search away they can find stan and myself on social media platforms great stan chris
01:08:02.440
thank you so much for your time sam thank you for having me thanks