#229 — A Few Thoughts for a New Year
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
150.03192
Summary
Sam Harris's thoughts on the end of the year and the start of the new one, and why we should pay attention to the things worth paying attention to, personally and professionally, in order to make sense of the past year and what we can do to make the next one better. He also talks about the crisis of trust in our institutions, and how they have contributed to the breakdown in public trust in them, and the ways in which they have failed to address the problems we are all facing, including the epidemic of Ebola and the ongoing pandemic of Chikungunya, the killer virus that has ravaged much of the world's population for the past two years, and is rapidly becoming a major threat to our health and well-being, as well as the ongoing efforts to fight the spread of misinformation and pseudoscientific pseudoscience spreading across social media and the mainstream media, and what it means for our ability to protect ourselves and our society from the threat of pandemic epidemics like Ebola and other major pandemic viruses like S.E. coli and other viruses that threaten to devastate our food supply and disrupt our daily lives. Make sense of it all here at The Making Sense Podcast. Make sense here at Making Sense here at the Making Sense podcast. Thanks to our sponsor, Amazon Prime and VaynerMedia for sponsoring the podcast. Making Sense is a production of Gimlet Media. Please consider pledging a review of the podcast by clicking the link below, and/or reviewing the podcast on iTunes, and leaving us a rating and review in your podcast review, and review on Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your listening choices are available. Thanks also, and we'll be giving you a discount on the podcast listening to the podcast in the future episodes of the making sense podcast, making sense in the next week! Thank you for listening and sharing the podcast! Thanks again for listening, and good vibes! - Your feedback is much appreciated. -Sam Harris and Good Luck, and Good Morning America - Timestamps: 5 Star Reviews: 5 Star Reviewer: 6 Starred: 7 Starred, 8 Starred 9 Starred? 10 Starred Podcast: 11 Starredacted, 12 Starred in the podcast 13 Starred by 15 Starred Out? 16 Starred In the podcast: 17 Starred By 17
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris.
00:00:24.280
Okay, well I want to say a few things about my hopes for the new year here. Like all of you,
00:00:33.460
I'm happy to get 2020 behind us, but of course there's no guarantee that 2021 will be better,
00:00:40.920
right? I mean, these calendar dates are just concepts that have very little connection to
00:00:45.660
the dynamics of what is actually happening out in the world, apart from the tenuous connection of
00:00:52.160
all of us hoping to reset our lives on January 1st, which is not nothing, but it's not a lot
00:00:59.160
either. As for whether a virus mutates, or a hostile foreign power hacks our government
00:01:06.220
and major corporations, and steals or manipulates sensitive data, these things happen on their own
00:01:13.360
schedule, as you know, and both of these things appear to have happened in the last few weeks.
00:01:17.600
To what end, it's not yet clear. But it's natural, and useful, I think, to use the change in calendar
00:01:27.440
as a device to clear one's head, and attempt to get one's priorities straight. So, like many of you,
00:01:35.280
that's what I'm doing. In fact, the madness of this last year has already helped me get my priorities
00:01:40.960
straight, or straighter. I now have far fewer browser tabs open in my life, and I think this will be true
00:01:50.880
going forward. There's a spirit of triage I now feel. What is worth paying attention to, personally
00:01:59.140
and professionally? I'm living with this question more and more. If you can think back to January
00:02:06.580
and February of last year, how were you planning to spend 2020? And how startling was it to discover
00:02:14.600
that the world had other plans? There's been a tsunami of private pain, even for fairly lucky
00:02:21.740
people. And for the unlucky, 2020 was just brutal. And publicly, there's been a failure, especially in
00:02:30.820
the United States, to cohere around a feeling of shared purpose, and shared sacrifice. And that has
00:02:38.740
been beyond disappointing. It's really been unnerving, how fully we failed here. And in its place,
00:02:47.780
we've witnessed a level of estrangement from one another, which has often been described as
00:02:53.040
hyper-partisanship in a political context. But that doesn't quite cover it. The level of hostility
00:03:00.400
and the degree to which it's been fed by lies and misinformation seems genuinely new to me,
00:03:08.720
and not at all compatible with our building a good society. Now, of course, the interaction between
00:03:15.720
technology, in particular social media, and politics has been the main story here. We've seen vast
00:03:23.580
numbers of people borne away on a tide of misinformation and conspiracy thinking, and it's rendered them
00:03:29.480
totally unreachable. In fact, our society appears to have shattered itself into competing cults.
00:03:36.560
The cult of Trumpism, with its especially crazy core of QAnon, and the cult of wokeness, with its
00:03:44.860
crazy core of critical race theory. I'm not saying these problems are precisely the same or necessarily
00:03:50.800
proportional, but they are the same in being constituted almost entirely by propaganda, to a
00:03:57.480
degree that should only be possible in dystopian fiction. It's like we've come ashore on the
00:04:02.980
proverbial island of liars, and it's just deranging. And all of this seems caused by and further causes a
00:04:11.060
breakdown in social trust and trust in institutions. On one level, a breakdown in trust is understandable.
00:04:17.760
The conjunctions of competence and incompetence we've seen have been fairly breathtaking. We've had
00:04:25.100
record-breaking vaccine development, alongside a total failure of political leadership on both the
00:04:31.060
left and the right, and at all levels, to successfully manage a pandemic. We have literally seen the time
00:04:38.140
course of medical research cut down to almost nothing. The Moderna vaccine was created in a weekend.
00:04:44.980
It was created before there had been a single death from COVID in the United States. Yes, it depended
00:04:50.920
on many years of prior work, but going from a viral genome sequence to a vaccine in a matter of days
00:04:57.960
is astonishing. And yet our most prestigious medical institutions, like the CDC, and our most
00:05:05.340
prestigious medical journals, like the New England Journal of Medicine, have worked extraordinarily
00:05:11.000
hard in the last year to destroy their reputations. The contamination of public health and scientific
00:05:18.400
communication by political dogmatism on both the left and the right has been catastrophic.
00:05:25.940
We've had our most respected medical voices either capitulate to Trump and his messaging or capitulate to
00:05:34.120
the wokeness. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, you haven't been paying attention.
00:05:38.440
And now we're botching the distribution of the vaccine. At the time I'm recording this,
00:05:44.800
it will take a decade to vaccinate the entire country at our current pace. And we've had nearly
00:05:50.980
a year to prepare for this moment. It's just incredible. Thousands of people are dying a day
00:05:57.880
as vaccine risks spoiling on our shelves. I mean, we're great at molecular biology,
00:06:06.100
but we appear to suck at everything else. And surely information and misinformation is at the core of
00:06:13.720
this. Something like 50% of our society appears to be quite sanguine about getting the novel
00:06:20.340
coronavirus, but terrified to get the vaccine for it. I've heard reports from hospitals where 50%
00:06:27.560
of the frontline healthcare workers are refusing their doses of vaccine. Throughout the pandemic,
00:06:34.160
and especially through the election and its aftermath, it has been amazing to hear from
00:06:39.220
people on both sides of what seems to be a mass hallucination, a pseudo-spiritual awakening that
00:06:46.000
has engulfed the minds of most of the people in our society. I mean, left and right have broken down
00:06:52.220
as concepts in many ways. But whatever you call them, the political extremes have gone mad.
00:06:58.600
Perhaps they were always mad. But the madness has crept inwards and has tainted vast stretches of the
00:07:05.540
mainstream. Mainstream Republicans have capitulated to Trump and Trumpism to a degree that I wouldn't
00:07:12.100
have thought possible. And the ideological capture of the media and our other institutions by wokeness
00:07:18.020
has been just as amazing. One has to reference the behavior of cults to begin to understand what's
00:07:24.500
going on here. And it's worth asking yourself, are you in a cult? Are you actually thinking clearly
00:07:32.300
about anything? Are you getting good information about anything? I asked this about myself, too. It has
00:07:41.360
become genuinely hard to find a path through information space that leads to anything like
00:07:46.540
daylight now. Do you think there was a massive voter fraud in the 2020 election and Trump actually won?
00:07:53.380
And Republican election officials and secretaries of state and judges are all in on the plot? Well,
00:08:00.940
if you do, you're in a cult. Do you think that racism and sexism and other forms of bigotry are
00:08:08.020
main problems in society now? And that they explain all current inequality? Do you think that great
00:08:14.840
companies and medical schools and the entertainment industry and other desirable places to learn and work
00:08:21.440
are currently in the business of excluding qualified people of color and women out of a preference for
00:08:28.580
white men? Is that really what you think? Well, then you're in a cult. Do you think the COVID pandemic
00:08:36.160
is basically a hoax? And that the lockdowns were imposed to destroy the economy and defeat Trump?
00:08:42.880
Do you think we're being told to wear masks just to get us to comply with arbitrary limits on our
00:08:47.120
freedom? Well, then you're in a cult. And the new media landscape has not helped matters. What I think
00:08:55.100
I've seen in many of my fellow podcasters and writers is the phenomenon of audience capture. My friend
00:09:01.780
Eric Weinstein came up with that phrase for undoubtedly an older phenomenon. But it's when you begin telling
00:09:07.860
your audience what they want to hear and you get rewarded for it and the cycle becomes self-reinforcing.
00:09:14.620
So some of this is probably inevitable, right? We all gravitate toward messages that we like and to
00:09:20.620
people we find persuasive. And these people tend to keep doing what works. You know, it's nice to be
00:09:26.420
liked, especially when the business model depends on it. But audience capture is a real problem and I
00:09:34.280
have consciously guarded against it. Ever since I discovered that whole sections of my audience were
00:09:39.280
outraged by one or another position I've taken, I decided not to be concerned about that and not
00:09:45.580
to do anything differently. And I don't think I'll ever understand those of you who claim to love what
00:09:51.220
I'm doing here on the podcast and who have read my books and followed my work for years, who imagine
00:09:57.020
that I would have been a fan of Donald Trump or wokeness. I mean, both of these grotesque objects
00:10:03.660
are the antithesis of everything I care about. Both are purely divisive, purely misleading.
00:10:12.280
Both represent a near total embrace of error. Trumpism and wokeness are like two doors leading
00:10:18.900
to alternate hells from my point of view. And between the two, I think I've offended 50% of you
00:10:25.080
in the last few years. And many of my guests have done likewise. We really need careful,
00:10:32.260
principled, intellectually honest people to help sort through the rubble now and begin building
00:10:38.920
again. And these are the types of people I'm eager to speak with on this podcast. I realize all of this
00:10:45.040
sounds a little gloomy, but it seems important to acknowledge how fully things have unraveled over
00:10:50.820
the last year. Of course, on another level, it's amazing that things work as well as they do.
00:10:56.860
And to even have the expectation that things will work and to be appalled when they don't
00:11:01.880
is a testament to our progress. We expect airplanes to not only take off and land safely, but to serve
00:11:08.900
decent coffee. We have come a long way in 100 years. 100 years from now, if we don't annihilate
00:11:16.380
ourselves in the meantime, we will view everything I'm complaining about today as just a few growing
00:11:22.620
pains on the way to a glorious future. I really want our children to inhabit that glorious future.
00:11:30.680
And it appears to be within reach. So much of our suffering is obviously unnecessary. So many of our
00:11:39.560
losses are the result of spectacular own goals. Of course, politics is the area where the worst of
00:11:47.100
this happens again and again. But the problem is much larger than politics. Ask yourself, what are we
00:11:54.180
doing here as a species? For the most part, we're creating and consuming culture. The near-term goal
00:12:02.320
should be pretty obvious. We have to build a culture that is conducive to sanity. We need a
00:12:09.980
culture that is at minimum compatible with our long-term survival. And we have serious problems
00:12:15.940
to solve. Infrastructure, pandemic preparedness, that would have been nice, right? Climate change,
00:12:24.560
cybersecurity, education, wealth inequality, our relationship with China.
00:12:30.460
Wouldn't it be amazing to just get busy and sort this stuff out without all the animosity and
00:12:37.980
conspiracy thinking and dogmatism and perverse incentives and everything else that makes sane
00:12:44.640
policies and compromises impossible? The issues are at once so complex and yet so simple. Just consider
00:12:54.000
our current moment through the lens of a single variable, wealth inequality. There are good
00:13:00.440
faith debates to be had about how much inequality is too much. But there really is no question that
00:13:05.680
this is a problem that decent, compassionate people, or even merely self-interested people,
00:13:11.580
are now wise to worry about. However rich and insulated you are, if you don't think that you've lost
00:13:18.240
something when the level of homelessness and crime soars in your city, well then you've lost your mind.
00:13:24.380
Honestly, even a sociopath should be able to recognize that his own selfishness is best fulfilled in a
00:13:32.520
context where others are doing at least reasonably well, where the sidewalks haven't come to resemble
00:13:37.920
free fire zones or refugee camps. I've been worrying about wealth inequality for at least a decade. I wrote a
00:13:45.400
few articles about it in the aftermath of the 2009 crash, and it's been a recurring topic on the podcast.
00:13:51.700
And I worry about it from a place of not wanting to stigmatize wealth at all. I think the people who
00:13:57.960
are railing against the mere existence of billionaires are just confused about economics.
00:14:02.780
But everyone who is railing against increased social welfare in all its forms, anyone for whom terms like
00:14:09.220
inequality and redistribution have become radioactive, is just confused about ethics.
00:14:15.560
What kind of world do we want to live in? It seems to me there are pretty uncontroversial answers to this
00:14:22.000
question. We want to live in a world where people are incentivized to do creative work that makes the
00:14:28.400
world better and better. We want cures for terrifying diseases. We want to be able to distribute vaccines
00:14:36.540
faster than we are at present. And we want a space program just for the fun of it, and also to ensure
00:14:43.740
that human life continues indefinitely. If we discover there's a massive asteroid on a collision
00:14:49.520
course with Earth, we want to be able to divert it and save our species, and every other species.
00:14:56.880
We actually want to be that competent. Therefore, we want to massively fund science. And we need a rich
00:15:05.720
civilization to do this. We want a future of real prosperity. And we are right to want that.
00:15:13.820
And obviously, we need a model for global growth that's sustainable. But the end game for us isn't
00:15:20.560
to cease innovating and improving our technology. We want our technology to become more and more
00:15:25.540
effective and benign. So this already rules out some visions of the future. This can't be a hippie
00:15:32.740
paradise where everything is made of hemp. Capitalism, for all its flaws, really seems to
00:15:39.160
have this part right. We need to work with the grain of human nature and leverage people's selfishness
00:15:45.820
and their desire for status in a way that brings out the best in us, not the worst. We need to
00:15:52.080
incentivize people to build things that actually work. It's not enough to just play the didgeridoo on the
00:15:58.300
sidewalk in Seattle or Portland. We need to get things done. And we want beautiful public spaces
00:16:05.980
and brilliant works of art and great food and cars and smartphones. But we also want a world where the
00:16:15.040
differences between good and bad luck don't cause us to avert our eyes in horror. We don't want a world
00:16:22.560
where people leap to their deaths from the rooftops of the factories that are building our toys.
00:16:28.320
We don't want an epidemic of homelessness in San Francisco or Los Angeles or New York. As we produce
00:16:35.560
more and more wealth, we have to become more compassionate and more connected to one another,
00:16:41.560
not more sociopathic. There are really two paths we can take here, and they are diverging steeply now.
00:16:49.960
And the only thing that will determine which path we take will be the ideas that prevail in the
00:16:55.920
culture. The ideas that win will affect each of us personally. There will be new norms to which we
00:17:03.460
will effortlessly adhere, because to do otherwise will be embarrassing. Wearing a seatbelt is a norm
00:17:09.920
that very few people need to rethink now. And yet it used to be a bizarre concession to fear.
00:17:15.420
Now you're just an imbecile not to wear a seatbelt. We need new norms that anchor our deeper values.
00:17:23.800
We need norms that make us better people. Let's be even more specific. It's been much noticed of
00:17:30.520
late that there seems to be an exodus in the tech community out of California to states that don't
00:17:36.580
have an income tax, in particular Texas and Florida. Now there's some question about whether or not this
00:17:42.160
trend has been overhyped. But I can personally account for tens of millions of dollars, and
00:17:49.720
probably even hundreds of millions of dollars, of California's tax base drying up, simply judging
00:17:56.160
from the people I know personally who are leaving the state, and who are in some cases taking their
00:18:01.140
companies and employees with them. In California, the top 1% of earners pay 50% of the taxes. So it
00:18:09.980
doesn't take that many rich people to decide to move before the state's revenue goes into freefall.
00:18:16.600
Now this is a very complicated issue, ethically and politically, and even psychologically. Because
00:18:23.680
of course it's rational for any individual to want to pay as little in taxes as he or she legally
00:18:29.540
can. And if we have a system wherein simply moving to another state amounts to the equivalent of
00:18:36.120
someone paying you millions of dollars a year to live there, it's very easy to see why that would
00:18:41.240
seem like an opportunity that's just too good to pass up. So I don't feel especially judgmental about
00:18:46.640
these people moving, especially when you consider how mismanaged our tax dollars often seem to be.
00:18:53.680
It would be one thing if the return on our taxes was undeniably good, but unfortunately the results are so
00:19:00.680
mixed, especially now, that it's very easy for people to become cynical. And many of these people
00:19:06.760
have become cynical about the prospects of government ever functioning effectively. But there's an
00:19:12.080
interesting needle to thread here. One can seek to pay as little in taxes as one legally can,
00:19:19.800
while also believing that taxes are necessary, and that the tax rate should be raised given the
00:19:26.680
magnitude of the magnitude of the need, while also believing that tax revenue is often wasted, and that
00:19:32.560
government needs to be seriously reformed. I don't see a contradiction there. Personally, I try to pay as
00:19:38.660
little in taxes as I can, legally, but I think taxes should be raised on everyone in my bracket. And I think
00:19:45.840
this, despite my certainty, that some of that money will be wasted, or spent in ways that I would judge
00:19:51.860
totally counterproductive. A challenge one often hears from libertarians is, you're free to pay more
00:19:58.640
into the treasury yourself, so why not just do that and shut up about raising taxes on the rest of us?
00:20:04.480
But that misses the point. It misses several points. No one should be eager to make a solitary sacrifice
00:20:11.380
that serves no purpose. The point is that waste and mismanagement aside, our infrastructure and
00:20:18.020
education and everything else in our society needs to be funded, and there is no one in a better
00:20:23.840
position to fund these things than the wealthy. Government mismanagement isn't an argument for not
00:20:30.700
paying taxes, and it isn't an argument for lower taxes. It's an argument for better government.
00:20:38.800
Of course, charitable giving is part of the picture here. Here's a new norm that we really must spread.
00:20:45.220
If you're wealthy enough to have hired professionals whose primary job is to ensure that you pay as
00:20:52.580
little as possible in taxes each year, well then you should also be giving a lot of your money away
00:20:57.400
to the most urgent causes. Not after you're dead, but every year while you're alive, and while you can
00:21:04.560
enjoy it. This goes to the question of what is wealth for? What is it good for? One thing it's good for
00:21:13.080
is that it gives you the ability to help people very directly. And if you don't use that ability,
00:21:20.460
given the excruciating need, people will begin to think that you're just selfish, as they should.
00:21:28.600
Actually, all the strands of this web converge on San Francisco in a way that's instructive.
00:21:34.620
Recently, Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan gave $75 million to San Francisco General
00:21:42.380
Hospital. And this is the largest gift to a public hospital ever, apparently. And yet the city's
00:21:50.480
board of supervisors voted 10 to 1 to condemn the naming of the hospital after Zuckerberg and Chan.
00:21:59.760
And they further vilified Zuckerberg in the process. So this moment contains the whole problem
00:22:07.260
in miniature. Zuckerberg and Chan gave $75 million to a hospital. And obviously this is a wonderful
00:22:15.440
thing to do. And the fact that this is the largest private gift to a public hospital ever tells you
00:22:22.800
that it should be celebrated rather than sneered at, which is what the social justice lunatics on the
00:22:28.520
board of supervisors have done. And they did this as their streets fill with homeless people and spent
00:22:35.480
needles. And the crime rate soars. They're spitting on a $75 million gift to a hospital.
00:22:44.600
But beneath all this, and beneath the animosity of the supervisors, is the growing problem of wealth
00:22:50.980
inequality. Zuckerberg's gift probably seems more generous than it is, in fact. And for someone with
00:22:57.420
75 billion dollars to cut a check for 75 million, that's like someone with 75 million cutting a check
00:23:04.440
for 75,000. Or for someone with 75,000 to give 75 dollars towards some cause. Okay, that is, it's no big
00:23:14.580
deal at all. In fact, the richer you get, the more this proportion falls apart. Someone with a net worth of
00:23:21.900
$75,000 is actually making more of a sacrifice by parting with $75. Because that increment of money
00:23:30.060
is still relevant to their budget. Once a person becomes fantastically wealthy, their personal
00:23:37.320
spending, even on the most extravagant luxuries, represents a tiny portion of their net worth.
00:23:44.100
So when you look at the details, this is not the sort of sacrifice one should be tempted to write
00:23:50.320
newspaper articles about. Actually looking at the Forbes list now reveals that Zuckerberg is currently
00:23:57.160
worth $100 billion. He seems to have made $25 billion when I wasn't looking. Given how quickly
00:24:04.540
Zuckerberg's wealth has grown, there were many days this year, probably most days this year, where his net
00:24:12.600
worth increased by more than $75 million. The wealthiest people in our society make millions
00:24:20.240
of dollars a day, every day, whether they work or not. Most people just don't have good intuitions
00:24:27.260
about the magnitude of these differences in wealth. The richest people now make in a day what the most
00:24:35.520
successful movie stars, Tom Cruise and Will Smith and Scarlett Johansson, make over the course of many
00:24:43.160
years, or even a lifetime, at the absolute pinnacle of success in the movie industry. This is where we
00:24:51.500
are in terms of wealth inequality. Again, I don't mean to demonize wealth at all. And it's worth noting
00:24:57.980
that Zuckerberg and his wife have pledged to give 99% of their wealth away over the course of their
00:25:03.060
lifetime. That's amazing, right? And that should be celebrated without any reservation whatsoever.
00:25:08.800
That's the sort of thing people should write newspaper articles about. Assuming they actually
00:25:13.320
do this, and they don't just park all the money in a charity after they die, they will be total heroes
00:25:19.600
for living this way, whatever else you might think about them. So there's a complicated set of issues
00:25:25.840
to think through here, politically and ethically. San Francisco is an extremely wealthy city,
00:25:31.880
which has been ruinously mismanaged. And the rich appear to be leaving for perfectly rational
00:25:38.800
reasons. This is a death spiral. And the quasi-socialist demonization of wealth, of the sort
00:25:47.160
that one hears from people like AOC and Elizabeth Warren, is part of the problem. We just can't afford
00:25:54.220
zero-sum thinking in a positive-sum game. And prosperity can be positive-sum. That's not to say there
00:26:01.560
aren't trade-offs and inevitable inequality. But we need to find policies that lead us in a direction
00:26:08.820
that benefits more or less everyone. And we need to incentivize people to really succeed,
00:26:13.980
and then use their taxes and charity to help others. It seems to me that what we need to solve
00:26:20.960
our problems is both competence and compassion. We have seen so little of either lately. And merely
00:26:30.000
dunking on people on Twitter won't produce these things. Becoming a single-issue thinker won't
00:26:37.180
produce these things. We have to recognize that we're living in an unhealthy ecology of ideas.
00:26:45.580
It's become like a Superfund site of bad memes, and we have to clean it up. Anyway, I intend to use my
00:26:53.320
podcast this year to bring you useful conversations in this vein. Not every episode will be about
00:27:00.300
solving problems. Sometimes we just need to hear about interesting things in physics. But more and
00:27:06.360
more, I want to drill down to ideas that actually have consequences for people's lives, whether
00:27:12.700
personally or at the level of public policy. So I'm looking to speak with guests who can help me
00:27:17.880
figure out what we should all be doing to make life better. And finally, I want to thank all of
00:27:24.800
you who are subscribed to the podcast. You make it possible for me to do this. And if you're not
00:27:30.880
subscribed and you want to be, you can do that on my website at samharris.org. As always, I want to
00:27:37.340
remind you that if you can't afford a subscription, you need only tell us that, and we'll give you a free
00:27:42.820
one. And this isn't just my COVID policy. This has always been the policy. I feel two things very
00:27:50.480
strongly in this space. I believe that we should value digital content appropriately, and that we'll
00:27:56.440
ultimately get what we pay for online. As you know, I think the ad model has been incredibly destructive.
00:28:03.860
But on the other hand, I believe that money should never be the reason why someone can't get access
00:28:08.480
to my digital content. Again, I see no contradiction here. Most of my stuff is behind a paywall and needs
00:28:15.640
to be for any of this to work. But it's free if you can't afford it. As most of you know, there are
00:28:22.040
two places where I currently publish my audio, on this podcast and on the Waking Up app. And Waking Up
00:28:28.680
has become much more than a meditation app. There's a growing library of lessons that are essentially
00:28:33.700
applied philosophy. We now have tracks on Stoicism by William Irvin, and more of those are coming.
00:28:41.040
And we'll soon have a section devoted to psychedelics. There's a lot going on over there at Waking Up,
00:28:46.040
and much more happening soon. So I just wanted to invite you to download the app and check it out,
00:28:51.820
if you haven't lately. As you know, if you're a subscriber to the podcast, you get access to the
00:28:57.320
conversations I have over at Waking Up through my website. But there's much more to Waking Up
00:29:02.860
than the conversations. And again, if you can't afford a subscription, you need only send an
00:29:08.020
email to support at wakingup.com and request a free account. It's the exact same policy we have
00:29:13.620
here on the podcast. Okay. Well, despite all the doom and gloom, I am really looking forward to this
00:29:22.100
year. And needless to say, I wish you all a healthy and happy one. Thanks for listening.