#234 — The Divided Mind
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
156.28647
Summary
Ian McGilchrist is a fellow of All Souls College at Oxford and a research fellow in neuroimaging at Johns Hopkins University. He is the author of the book The Master and His Emblem: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. In this episode, we talk about the differences between the right and left hemispheres of the brain, which are fascinating and consequential, and I think underappreciated. And this gets us into many thorny issues: the prospect that consciousness might be partitioned, even in an intact brain, the boundary between consciousness and attention, and how face-to-face encounters differ between the left hemisphere and the right hemisphere in modern culture. We also discuss the possibility that the brain is a mere receiver of mind, and people s expectations about surviving death. And we certainly could have gone on for many more hours. But before we jump in, I m here to speak with Ian McGillchrist about what I consider to be one of the most interesting topics in any field: The Diffided Brain. As always, I never want money to be the reason why someone can t get access to access to the podcast. So if you can t afford a subscription, there s an option at Samharris.org to request a free account and get 100% of those requests, no questions asked. No questions asked, and you re making the podcast possible. Sam Harris - The Making Sense Podcast, by Sam Harris, by and by the excellent author of The Master & His Emblem? is a production of Gimlet Media, a podcast produced in collaboration with the excellent podcast, The Diffined Brain, by , by The Diffled Brain, and by the brilliant author, , and . in the making sense podcast, in this podcast is of the Making Sense podcast, and , by and so on, , in ? so you can help us make the podcast or to make it so that we can make sense of the podcast? and that s making it better than that? , can you help us help us do that, and we re making it more of that, too, and so much more, and more like that, can we help us, and they do it better, etc., etc., etc., and they're helping us do it, and that's a really good thing, right?
Transcript
00:00:10.900
Just a note to say that if you're hearing this,
00:00:15.520
and will only be hearing the first part of this conversation.
00:00:18.460
In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense Podcast,
00:00:24.180
There you'll find our private RSS feed to add to your favorite podcatcher,
00:00:32.400
and therefore it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers.
00:00:35.920
So if you enjoy what we're doing here, please consider becoming one.
00:00:39.520
As always, I never want money to be the reason why someone can't get access to the podcast.
00:00:45.800
there's an option at samharris.org to request a free account.
00:01:03.900
Ian is a fellow of All Souls College at Oxford,
00:01:07.440
and a fellow of the Royal College of Psychiatrists,
00:01:13.420
and he was a research fellow in neuroimaging at Johns Hopkins.
00:01:22.260
The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World.
00:01:25.340
And that is the focus of our conversation today.
00:01:27.680
We talk about the differences between the right and left hemispheres of the brain,
00:01:41.280
We discuss the popular misconceptions about these differences,
00:01:44.680
the prospect that consciousness might be partitioned,
00:01:50.420
the difference between consciousness and attention,
00:01:53.200
the boundary between the conscious and unconscious mind,
00:01:55.700
how face-to-face encounters differ between the hemispheres,
00:01:59.340
the unique deficits that result from damage to each,
00:02:02.900
the ascendancy of the left hemisphere in modern culture,
00:02:06.400
the possibility that the brain is a mere receiver of mind,
00:02:14.580
Anyway, I thought it was a fascinating conversation.
00:02:17.060
We certainly could have gone on for many more hours.
00:02:38.020
one of the most interesting topics in any field.
00:02:57.060
what is your academic and intellectual background?
00:03:01.440
I've been interested in philosophical questions,
00:03:30.560
theology and philosophy wasn't an honours degree.
00:45:00.840
So even in a perfectly functioning brain where,
00:45:18.160
question about consciousness because, of course,
00:45:38.380
half a percent and five percent of what's going
00:45:43.960
In fact, I read a paper in which the authors said
00:45:48.120
that 99.44% of brain activity was not within the field
00:45:58.240
But the way I would see that is that there is also
00:46:02.180
material that can quite quickly become conscious.
00:46:05.120
It's just that it's not conscious now for reasons
00:46:09.540
If we are to function, we simply can't be conscious
00:46:22.080
So the way I see it is that one distinction between
00:46:24.980
the left and the right hemisphere, which we must
00:46:27.920
come on to at some point, is that the left hemisphere
00:46:37.100
But it's only to like three degrees of the 360 degree
00:47:03.180
the bit that is within the spotlight is the bit
00:47:08.520
And that's the bit we say, oh, I'm conscious of that.
00:47:11.440
But when the spotlight moves, five minutes later,
00:47:14.440
you're no longer conscious of what you were conscious
00:47:25.200
It's like the part of the stage that's not illuminated.
00:47:28.840
It's just the bit we're not any longer attending to
00:47:30.960
in this very particular, highly self-conscious consciousness.
00:47:40.220
I think I would bound the concept of consciousness
00:47:46.300
Because for me, again, I think consciousness as a concept
00:47:50.980
is actually irreducible, which is to say we define it
00:48:00.920
You know, I like Thomas Nagel's framing that it's something
00:48:07.240
So if a bat is conscious, that's simply saying that there's
00:48:12.080
If you could trade places with a bat, you'd have some qualitative character
00:48:19.820
It wouldn't be synonymous with just having the lights go out.
00:48:22.460
And so when talking about one's own conscious experience,
00:48:28.260
I would differentiate consciousness from attention, say.
00:48:34.480
but also dimly aware of the things that I'm trying to exclude
00:48:38.580
from my experience by focusing on the one thing.
00:48:44.220
you know, very much analogous to what we experience in vision.
00:48:47.520
You know, you have your foveal, you know, in-focus vision,
00:48:50.360
and then you have all the stuff you can see in the corner of your eye.
00:48:58.060
but then there's this wider field of illuminated experience
00:49:05.000
And at the margins of this, it's always possible to have, as you say,
00:49:17.940
And there, you know, as William James quite brilliantly pointed out,
00:49:25.100
our experience of this, the kind of liminal boundary
00:49:31.720
has a kind of structure that can be interrogated if you're clever.
00:49:37.660
And we've learned to do that scientifically in all kinds of ways.
00:49:41.800
But even just introspectively, you can notice things that,
00:49:45.420
one example that James gave is that if you think about
00:49:49.860
what it's like to suffer the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon,
00:49:55.240
you're trying to remember a word, you're trying to remember somebody's name,
00:50:00.500
So on the one hand, we're talking about what is absent from consciousness.
00:50:08.880
There is a vacancy, which you're struggling to fill.
00:50:12.940
But this vacancy has structure because someone can say to you,
00:50:23.520
You can exclude Jim because Jim is not the name you're trying to think of,
00:50:27.920
and yet you don't know what the name is that you're trying to think of.
00:50:31.740
You know, there are fascinating aspects to this where,
00:50:33.960
take a phenomenon like hemi-neglect, which, you know,
00:50:37.860
we're in our leisurely way getting to is one of these issues where,
00:50:43.240
you know, where you have a, in this case, a right hemisphere lesion,
00:50:49.740
which causes this phenomenon of people neglecting the left half of the world
00:51:00.520
So if you tell them to draw a clock face, they'll draw a circle,
00:51:05.220
but then they'll put all the numbers on the right side of the clock.
00:51:08.400
If you ask them to start writing on a piece of paper,
00:51:11.840
they'll start writing down just the right half of the piece of paper.
00:51:19.680
which is in order to systematically neglect the left half of the world,
00:51:27.780
And to know where the middle is, you do need to know where the left half of the world is.
00:51:31.860
I mean, in order to reliably start writing on the right half of a piece of paper,
00:51:37.560
in order to jump over to the right side of things.
00:51:40.560
So the question is, again, the very strange question from my point of view
00:51:48.460
is happening subliminally, you know, in the dark,
00:51:54.820
It's that some of it could be associated with consciousness,
00:52:04.120
and then get the rest of the person to ignore it.
00:52:08.300
There's something that it's like to know the word
00:52:13.900
and yet not provide it or not be able to provide it.
00:52:23.720
but insofar as the real estate of consciousness itself
00:52:46.620
There's something that it's like to be part of your mind
00:52:58.200
even if you're convinced that that is a possibility,
00:53:02.240
and even if you see some indication of that in your life
00:53:12.800
where it really seems like there's an author of the dream
00:53:16.420
that has anticipated you as the protagonist of the dream
00:53:31.640
I mean, like, that's just an incredible experience.
00:53:33.980
They say, just, you're the protagonist in your dream,
00:53:51.420
And so how is it possible for part of your mind
00:53:56.820
something that the other part of your mind will find funny?
00:54:19.500
If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation,
00:54:27.780
Once you do, you'll get access to all full-length episodes
00:54:37.020
and the conversations I've been having on the Waking Up app.