#262 — The Future of American Democracy
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
162.28044
Summary
In this episode of the Making Sense podcast, I speak with Andrew Yang about his new book, Forward Notes on the Future of Our Democracy, and his new political party, the Forward Party. We cover the obvious brokenness of our political system, the importance of open primaries and rank choice voting as a means of reforming it, and his experience running for the presidency and the job of mayor in New York City. Andrew also talks about why he decided to write a memoir of his experience as a presidential candidate and why he founded a political party to address the problems that led him to write the book and found the party. And we talk about the potential role for The Forward Party as a political platform for the future of our democracy. And we cover the three problems he identified as the root cause of our brokenness, and what they are, and how to fix them. You can find the full series of episodes on The Making Sense Podcast by searching for Making Sense, wherever you get your podcasts. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers. We don t run ads on the podcast, but we do make sure to mention them when we mention them in the show. Thank you so much for supporting the podcast! We do not endorse any of the products mentioned in the podcast. Make sure to become a supporter of Making Sense by becoming a patron of the podcast by clicking the link below. It helps us spread the word about what we're making sense. Subscribe to the podcast and get access to the latest episodes of the making sense, and learn more about what's going on in your favorite podcast, wherever else you get to learn about making sense and what you can do to support the podcast? Thanks for listening to our making sense? You'll get a discount code, and you'll get 20% off the show, and a chance to win a discount on future episodes of Making sense, too! To become a member of the Podcast? If you're listening to the Making sense Podcast, you get 10% off of our newest episode of our podcast, you'll become a discount, too get 5% of $5,000, plus a discount of $10,000 and a free of $50,000 of your choice, and we'll get an ad discount, plus other perks like that gets you get a whole bunch of perks, too much of that?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
welcome to the making sense podcast this is sam harris just a note to say that if you're hearing
00:00:12.600
this you are not currently on our subscriber feed and will only be hearing the first part
00:00:16.980
of this conversation in order to access full episodes of the making sense podcast you'll
00:00:21.900
need to subscribe at sam harris.org there you'll find our private rss feed to add to your favorite
00:00:27.120
podcatcher along with other subscriber only content we don't run ads on the podcast and
00:00:32.600
therefore it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers so if you enjoy
00:00:36.620
what we're doing here please consider becoming one
00:00:38.940
okay today i'm speaking with andrew yang andrew has a new book just out today i believe
00:00:55.620
the title is forward notes on the future of our democracy and he also has a new political party
00:01:03.560
the forward party and in today's podcast we cover all of the relevant experiences and issues
00:01:11.100
that led him to write the book and found the party we cover the obvious brokenness of our
00:01:20.660
political system the importance of things like open primaries and rank choice voting as a means of
00:01:27.460
reforming it we talk about his experience running for the presidency and for the job of mayor in new
00:01:35.480
york city very different experiences and we cover many other interesting issues here politically and
00:01:44.360
socially anyway it's always great to speak with andrew and i hope you enjoy the conversation as much as i did
00:01:52.960
i am back with andrew yang andrew thanks for joining me again sam it's great to be back with you
00:02:07.660
it's uh you know anytime i talk to you something good is going on we're going to launch you in one
00:02:13.420
direction or another every time we speak that's uh that's what i'm getting used to now first we should
00:02:18.260
mention at the top that uh you have a new book uh the title is forward notes on the future of our
00:02:24.540
democracy which is um essentially your memoir of being a presidential candidate which is very
00:02:32.440
had to be a fascinating experience and um it comes across in the book and then you're basically your
00:02:39.460
pitch for the ways in which we can change our politics and the and the role for the forward party
00:02:45.300
uh in that conversation and so i think we'll we'll save that that final piece for the end but um
00:02:52.380
let's talk about the the nature of the problem you say very early in the book that um democracy itself
00:03:00.440
is losing legitimacy so much of the book is is a look at the ways in which our system is broken
00:03:07.200
and this brokenness relates to politics it relates to the media it relates to a fundamental distrust in
00:03:15.480
institutions that is now spreading to catastrophic effect and it also relates to the issue that
00:03:23.400
really launched your presidential run which is the is a growing concern around inequality you know
00:03:31.420
wealth inequality in particular as as you wanted to address by ubi but also with respect to education
00:03:39.360
and health care and other variables so i think there's really three problems we could talk about
00:03:45.140
before we start getting into solutions politics you know two-party politics the media and inequality
00:03:52.560
in general and i thought we could just kind of track through them and get your view on them as a
00:03:58.440
candidate maybe in both as you know in your presidential run and i'd be interested to hear
00:04:04.280
how the run for mayor of new york was a different experience so let's start with politics what was it
00:04:12.440
like to run for president and and what was it like let's take it from the the beginning i know we've
00:04:18.320
talked about this a little bit but i mean your book is is so interesting on this point what was it like
00:04:24.360
to do this when no one knew who you were i mean that and for the longest time that was the case
00:04:32.200
and so i mean at the outset it seems like a completely quixotic enterprise to declare your candidacy for the
00:04:39.740
presidency and you know the reactions of friends and people uh who would support you uh out of out of
00:04:47.120
some prior relationship without any expectation that you could possibly get anywhere yeah take us back to
00:04:53.480
that to the beginning sure i i do tell some fun stories in the book about how i'd go to my son's
00:04:59.420
birthday party and another dad would say oh what do you do and then i didn't want to say i'm running
00:05:04.180
for president because i would have seemed crazy so i would say i'm in policy or i'm an author that
00:05:12.780
my evasiveness would often not work and then i'd wind up saying i'm actually running for president now and
00:05:18.360
then we'd have a 30 minute conversation about that and at the end of it they would not sign up to
00:05:24.360
volunteer for my campaign they'd be like oh that's really interesting good luck with that so you you can
00:05:28.720
imagine why i wouldn't really want to have that conversation over and over again yeah and during
00:05:33.540
that time i'm so grateful to you sam because you and i sat down for a conversation like this one and
00:05:40.400
your podcast really launched my campaign in multiple ways one the people who listened decided
00:05:49.920
to take an interest in my campaign and supported and donated uh which i was incredibly grateful for
00:05:55.080
but then this iowan who was organizing something called a wing ding was a huge fan of yours
00:06:00.960
and decided to invite me to iowa to speak in 2018 on the basis of our conversation
00:06:07.960
so you were a better friend to me than a lot of others despite the fact that at that point we were
00:06:15.740
uh still just you know getting to know each other and you said something to another journalist that i
00:06:22.500
really appreciated you said well you know i don't know andrew that well but he seems like a fairly
00:06:27.000
normal fellow who just decided to ruin his life by running for president i heard that i was like oh i'm
00:06:34.020
so glad that came through but the early months of the campaign were like that where i had a vision
00:06:40.220
for what the campaign could be and uh that vision slowly started to grow thanks to people like you
00:06:46.240
and the people who worked on my campaign yeah this this is one of the the points you make in the book
00:06:51.220
which um was a genuine surprise for me i mean it shouldn't have been i've certainly noticed this
00:06:58.380
process i mean it was it was all on the surface but until you pointed it out i was someone who
00:07:06.080
along with i think most people assumed that there is a kind of egocentricity and narcissism and just
00:07:15.700
a search for ego gratification that is informing many presidential runs and i mean that that may be the case
00:07:25.560
in in certain candidates but what you make clear again which really should not have been surprising
00:07:32.780
but you you make it so vividly clear in discussing the experience of marianne williamson and joe sestak
00:07:39.620
that the process for most people unless you you already happen to be a front runner for some reason or
00:07:47.580
another the process is just ego annihilating uh maybe you can talk about that yeah you show up my
00:07:55.260
first trip to new hampshire there were literally two people there waiting for me maybe one and one
00:08:00.280
person just happened to be there and politely pretended they were there for me and that was
00:08:05.480
an entire day uh i went to a rally in iowa labor day in 2018 that drew 12 people maybe and none of them
00:08:15.400
were there for me either uh and these were everyday occurrences and keep in mind at this point
00:08:21.020
uh though i was a very very anonymous presidential candidate you know i'd still done some things in
00:08:26.300
my life like i'm still like a person who like values his time and you know has a family and stuff so
00:08:34.220
you you would do things all the time that weren't positively reinforcing and the the media uh as i write
00:08:41.800
in the book is a huge part of this dynamic where the media will completely sideline you if you're not
00:08:48.180
one of the major candidates and when they do mention you they will mock you it really is the way it goes
00:08:54.180
as happened with uh many other candidates and happened to me to some measure uh and so when you
00:09:01.340
talk about the problems i outline in the book the media gauntlet was such a huge part of running for
00:09:08.120
president and i'm now convinced that that's core to our problems like it's core to why we can't seem to
00:09:13.940
make any real progress if memory serves you weren't mocked so much and when i think about
00:09:20.960
the mocking part i do think about marianne williamson who as you point out in her own
00:09:26.520
life you know had a you know a very successful career lots of people loved her she made a lot of
00:09:33.380
money she had a very big platform she ran a successful charity but she's she's very accomplished
00:09:39.940
in her world i mean you might not agree with her metaphysics in the end but she really had a very
00:09:47.580
comfortable life that you know she didn't need to screw up and then she runs for the presidency
00:09:54.380
and is immediately framed as a kind of punchline and it's um i think you could have predicted it with
00:10:03.160
something like a hundred percent certainty that that would have happened but that version happens but
00:10:07.960
then they're they're the people who have have have a fair amount of gravitas in terms of their
00:10:13.540
biographies where there's there's no obvious joke to make at their expense but they're just utterly
00:10:20.300
ignored by the media and and for you you kind of you fell more into that bin and and there were there
00:10:26.840
were some egregious i mean the example maybe say something about joe sestak for a second because
00:10:32.100
you know i wrote in the margin of your book when you mentioned him i i literally wrote who
00:10:36.760
a question mark because i i have never heard of joe sestak right so did you then google him and look
00:10:43.240
him up no i i haven't yet i'm a blank slate with apart from what i read in your book he's got you
00:10:49.400
know give me a little color on on joe for a second joe as a phd from harvard uh was uh an admiral in
00:10:58.520
the u.s navy was entrusted with thousands of lives and was a two-term member of congress from
00:11:06.040
pennsylvania so he's a very very serious person who had spent decades in service and had put his
00:11:13.080
life on the line for the country when he decided to run for president it was like he didn't exist
00:11:19.480
and it was somewhat mystifying i spent time with joe so that's another thing that happens on the
00:11:24.640
trail sam is that i have hung out with virtually all of the other candidates in union halls and
00:11:33.180
people's driveways and at the fair and the steak fry so you do get a sense of people and i have spent
00:11:42.460
time with joe and marianne and uh many others but joe's a great guy a great man a real patriot
00:11:49.560
uh he does have a lot of gravitas where he's commanded thousands of people the media treated
00:11:56.200
him like a non-entity and because he's a committed individual he even walked across the state of new
00:12:02.660
hampshire as a way to try and generate attention for his campaign completely ignored and when it was
00:12:08.720
mentioned it was mentioned as kind of a look at the crazy person sort of thing i thought that was
00:12:13.680
deeply unfair because you know again if you look at right joe's record he's a very serious individual
00:12:18.180
who should have been uh given a fair hearing yeah and in your case there were was um some fairly
00:12:26.960
stark and egregious efforts to ignore you literally like like fundraising memory serves there were like
00:12:35.540
fundraising graphics where you like you know showing the candidates who had raised a certain
00:12:40.180
amount of money or gone up in the polls enough to make debates and you were left out where people
00:12:46.340
who had raised less money and were ranked lower than you were left in the graphics this happened most
00:12:52.960
on msnbc how much of this i think you uncovered at one point that there was a policy that you should
00:12:59.560
just not be talked about you know how much of this was inadvertent and how much of it was actually
00:13:04.300
an explicit effort to disappear your campaign it happened consistently enough where you really
00:13:12.260
could not chalk it up to neglect or incompetence or omission i think the exact count was a dozen times
00:13:21.200
and uh we heard later from a producer ariana pacari who was at msnbc during that time that she was given
00:13:28.800
a list of candidates not to ever invite on the show or interview and i was on that list so there was
00:13:35.280
definitely a decision made at some point and if you wanted to hypothesize you know i i believe that
00:13:40.400
there is an ownership structure at msnbc where you could draw a pretty direct line to people who were
00:13:45.200
backing joe but at the time i tried to give them the benefit of the doubt and it was only later in
00:13:52.260
the campaign when i had just gone through a debate that msnbc had moderated where they clearly wanted
00:13:59.240
nothing to do with me where i decided to say look like i'm not going to appear on msnbc unless they
00:14:05.480
start actually treating us fairly and at that point they completely omitted any mention of me from the
00:14:12.780
race for the following month plus during really the final stretch of the campaign so it was an important
00:14:20.000
time it was most stark when i actually made the seventh debate stage which was a very significant
00:14:25.720
piece of news i was the last non-white candidate to make the debate stage and msnbc decided not to
00:14:32.040
mention that even though that was uh mainstream news for just about everybody so there's gonna be more to
00:14:38.360
say about the media in a minute because it's just an enormous problem on many fronts now but going
00:14:44.360
back to your presidential run before well really at any point what was the most surprising part about
00:14:52.480
this process to you i mean you must have had some expectations of what it would be like in in what
00:14:58.900
ways were those expectations violated it was around my treatment by certain types of institutions where i kind
00:15:08.120
of imagined that maybe some people would be excited to have a conversation about the automation of jobs and
00:15:15.220
technology and ai and some people might even be interested in or excited by by my being the first asian
00:15:22.260
american man to run for president as a democrat like some people who really love to talk about the firsts in
00:15:28.500
various categories and neither of those things was true it turns out that that that what i think of as
00:15:36.920
journalistic organizations of fact did not seem to care about the decimation of millions of
00:15:41.180
manufacturing jobs and the ongoing automation and dehumanization of the economy and what it made me
00:15:46.740
realize sam and made me more grateful to thinkers like you is that there is a particular discourse and
00:15:55.000
language in media there's a particular discourse and language in politics and they aren't the discussion of
00:16:02.860
fact in the way that you'd hope and i thought they were going in and so my relative success and
00:16:10.620
performance ended up being based upon all of these behaviors and adaptations that i adopted
00:16:16.680
in order to try and compete but it was very discouraging to me that it seemed like when i was talking about
00:16:24.960
economic facts and figures it was like i was speaking a foreign language yeah so yeah that's something
00:16:30.600
that you go through in the book as well i mean just the hacks you found for a system that really
00:16:36.380
didn't care to hear from you on substantive issues but what could be exploited by a a dance video
00:16:45.300
uh or a workout video what did you begin to think i guess what do you think now about this system by
00:16:52.520
which we pick our leaders right i mean it's just i mean we're going to get into the the political
00:16:57.560
reforms you you recommend but what i mean it's just it had to be bizarre to see that the way to get
00:17:05.040
traction i mean the the classic moment of this from years past which has been much remarked upon but like
00:17:11.540
the moment where you know hillary clinton's campaign was transformed when she shed a tear in a diner
00:17:19.580
over whatever it was you know it's like the fact that the attention of the media can be swung
00:17:26.960
by i guess the human interest component of a story without any substance and it really can't be swung
00:17:37.040
by substance it seems yes i characterize it as a reality tv show at one point during the debates
00:17:43.220
but there are narratives and characters that the media in particular is interested in enhancing and
00:17:50.540
elevating and that's really the crux of the coverage in my case my leaning into humor or
00:18:00.940
physical activities or whatever it was uh ended up being positive in terms of our coverage
00:18:10.360
and the energy but ezra klein said something about how we're collapsing systemic issues into
00:18:16.220
personalized narratives and i i think that's like a reasonable characterization of of a lot of the
00:18:21.320
political coverage though there is a real agenda behind a lot of it uh where the the media just decides
00:18:28.100
to elevate certain characters and ignore others i think ignore is their main weapon of choice
00:18:34.740
when they want someone not to get anywhere i think uh and then kind of like slightly
00:18:42.280
mocking snide ridicule might be like their second weapon of choice and then among the approved characters
00:18:50.100
then they'll constantly be trying to characterize people and talk about something around their
00:18:58.840
relationships behavior emotions one thing that happened to me a lot on the trail and this is very
00:19:04.640
true of this process is they are constantly digging for vulnerability 99 times out of 100 if they find
00:19:11.540
a vulnerability it's not going to be good for you like they're not going to be like oh this person's
00:19:18.520
really human and vulnerable isn't that nice they'd be like oh look at this so that that that's one of
00:19:23.760
the things that unfortunately makes politicians into automatons over time so how is running for mayor
00:19:30.820
of new york different i mean one is a different office although you know unlike most uh mayor races it
00:19:39.120
does have a national uh lens on it but what strikes me the way one big difference had to be that by the
00:19:45.920
time you you ran for mayor you were pretty famous you know you were not you were i think naturally viewed
00:19:53.680
i certainly viewed you as a front runner without even looking at the polls because of your your
00:20:00.380
national platform at that point how was your experience of being a candidate different it was
00:20:06.900
a completely different dynamic to your point sam where on the presidential trail i was continuously
00:20:11.660
trying to build up energy and race against oblivion whereas in the mayoral i was the center of
00:20:18.220
attention essentially from day one i will say that the media coverage tended to be quite negative or
00:20:25.640
questioning and they would chalk it up to my being the front runner though i think there might have been a
00:20:30.200
couple of other dynamics and so in many ways it was kind of the opposite of my presidential run
00:20:35.120
where where instead of being the unlikely underdog constantly doing things to get energy um instead i was like
00:20:45.720
the front runner who was continuously under attack by other candidates through the press often
00:20:52.440
because that was their best way to try and win yeah yeah and so what do you
00:21:00.200
what do you make of the fact uh that you didn't win maybe if you had to ascribe it to
00:21:05.280
a couple of uh most important causes what what what happened i think the single biggest variable
00:21:12.800
was the reopening of the city and then the crime surge in new york where it was on the front page of
00:21:20.800
at least some of the papers every day and that being the number one concern heavily favored
00:21:28.020
eric adams because he was a police officer earlier the main narrative was around reopening and economic
00:21:35.420
recovery and those were things that people saw as a strength of mind right right okay so let's just
00:21:43.920
talk about our the the the the political system as it is and uh what to do about it because i i think
00:21:52.060
wherever someone is on the on the spectrum of of political concern bias persuasion i think everyone
00:22:00.480
agrees that there's something less than optimal about our system as it exists uh what do you what do you
00:22:08.180
ascribe the the main dysfunction to at this point how is it broken and this is the heart of my book
00:22:15.900
the deeper i got into the machinery so to speak and now at this point i would consider myself either
00:22:24.420
friends or friendly with dozens of political figures most of them on the democratic side because i i ran as a
00:22:32.420
democrat but you know all of these people and you start to get a sense of the environment that they
00:22:39.440
operate within why we're stuck really and so i i do want to go back to some first principles because
00:22:47.520
i've been learning myself about some things that i'd taken for granted but the core argument in my book
00:22:54.140
is that people will do what their incentives demand and if you are a political figure today your incentives
00:23:01.640
are to generally cater to the most polarized and extreme points of view and voters in your district
00:23:09.120
because that's who's going to vote you back in one numerical contrast that i cite is that congress
00:23:18.300
has a 28 approval rating nationwide right now which probably doesn't surprise anyone listening to this
00:23:24.180
it's like yeah three out of four of us don't think things are going well the individual re-election rate
00:23:29.160
for members of congress is 92 percent so even though seven out of ten of us are really really sad
00:23:37.060
without things are going uh you're almost assured of re-election if you decide to run which most of them do
00:23:44.680
because they they really like this job the people that will decide whether you come back are not
00:23:49.440
the mainstream public but the 10 to 20 percent most extreme voters in either the democratic party or the republican party
00:23:58.480
because 83 percent of the congressional districts are now safely democratic or republican
00:24:04.520
so your incentives are to be less reasonable and more ideological and unfortunately that's what we're seeing on both sides
00:24:11.920
which is leading us to this historic level of polarization that we all can feel
00:24:18.340
that is resulting in political violence and could end up being a new civil war that ends up bringing down
00:24:29.720
i just want to reiterate your your opening point about the power of incentives because
00:24:36.020
what when viewed from outside there are so many institutions and there's so many human dramas
00:24:45.040
where you where you where you where it's very easy to believe that the people involved who are doing
00:24:51.200
these inexplicably stupid heinous things either are sociopaths or malignantly selfish or total morons
00:25:03.920
and it's very easy to believe the worst of the individuals involved until you have some insight into the system
00:25:13.280
in which they're forced to function and if it's a system where the incentives are terrible
00:25:18.980
even very good people very competent people very smart people wind up doing disastrously stupid destructive
00:25:30.380
it's not to say there aren't narcissists and incompetence and people who you wouldn't want in power
00:25:37.240
in these systems but it's got to be for the most part a story of decent fairly competent people
00:25:46.620
incentivized terribly by the system that's in place
00:25:50.560
that's exactly right sam and a result of understanding this is that we should not expect it to change or get
00:25:57.380
any better because people will if anything the incentives are higher now than they've ever been
00:26:03.480
and the political incentives toward the extremes are now compounded by the media
00:26:09.480
which at this point is separating us into ideological camps
00:26:13.380
and ginning up support for the good guys and you know hatred for the bad guys
00:26:18.700
and then pouring gasoline on the whole thing is social media
00:26:21.940
which obviously is going to reward the most inflammatory and aggressive language and behavior
00:26:30.340
so we're being set up we're being set up to turn on each other to eventually end up disintegrating
00:26:39.560
in terms of the society we currently regard as you know like a normal safe environment
00:26:45.820
and that's what i concluded from my journey into this which is that these people are not bad people
00:26:52.920
some of them are not great people but like for the most part they're they're reasonable people
00:26:56.880
responding to perverse incentives and so then the great project becomes how can you in real life
00:27:03.320
improve their incentives and i do want to give a shout out to you and this is something that is a
00:27:09.540
major theme of the book is that to me you represent the antidote in many ways sam it's like what are the
00:27:14.960
you know media incentives for you i mean you're just like a highly reasoned individual
00:27:20.780
like you don't have the same um you know i don't think your producer is uh giving you a list
00:27:27.240
of people not to talk to or anything like that you know that there's like a search right now people
00:27:32.460
are groping for trusted perspectives and voices more and more and i i just want to thank you personally
00:27:38.640
for being uh such a a huge figure uh for people who are looking for wisdom and truth really
00:27:47.420
oh well it's it's great to hear and um i happen to be in a spot where there are there are almost
00:27:56.060
no incentives that aren't of my own making you know and i have consciously designed my life that way
00:28:02.780
and it's uh you know it's not that it's impossible to um be badly incentivized even in this space but
00:28:08.740
it's much harder and it's you know and that's why i'm here and it's it's a relief frankly to be able
00:28:14.520
to say whatever i want to say and to talk to whoever i want to talk to and to not be calibrating
00:28:20.740
any of that against any kind of outside pressure you know even pressure from my audience and i don't
00:28:27.120
know how much you followed me down these various byways but you know whenever i've discovered that a
00:28:32.940
significant percentage of my audience really disagrees with me about something that's the one the one
00:28:40.080
signal for me that i need to take pains not to be trained by in any way because i notice other people
00:28:48.180
being captured by their audience in various ways you know i just have never wanted that so when i
00:28:53.960
discovered that you know a significant percentage of my audience i never really drilled down to what
00:28:59.620
it was but it seemed like something like 20 percent favored trump for reasons that i still cannot
00:29:06.740
fathom i just made it a point to not care how much pain i got from them every time i wanted to
00:29:12.020
trample on trump because i just it felt important and so it is with the equally large percentage of
00:29:18.620
my audience that is very far to the left and hates everything i have to say about wokeness and identity
00:29:23.760
politics the pain i get from them i i i have decided to take as noise rather than signal because i it just
00:29:32.660
is just very important for me to preserve my my freedom to say what i think is true and important
00:29:37.820
rather than to be course correcting based on what's rewarding me from my audience and what what you get
00:29:43.540
on on any of these pain points and this is this is obviously amplified by social media is there's so
00:29:50.000
much more energy from the haters than from the people who agree with you that it really you can really
00:29:58.220
get blown around by it's highly disproportionate the noise yeah yeah if someone's virulently opposed
00:30:04.100
it just seems like the most prominent thing in the world even though there could be a hundred people
00:30:08.100
who just silently nodded yeah yeah so we're living in the system where it's something less than 10 percent
00:30:15.100
of any population can really steer the conversation on a polarizing issue because they just have so much
00:30:23.920
more energy that i mean so we've got these various activist groups on the left and we've got you know
00:30:29.940
all the noise that comes out of trumpistan and you know the most extreme voices over there you do get
00:30:36.280
the sense that on many points you have a lot of reasonable people that have been cowed into silence
00:30:42.480
and therefore aren't influencing the conversation and and it's just and the media doesn't seem to
00:30:49.660
care except i mean the media just they just keep amplifying the extremes well again that's where
00:30:57.000
their incentives are i mean they've figured out that their ratings will be higher and their ad revenue
00:31:02.380
will be higher if they cater to a particular point of view and then reinforce it yeah there was an
00:31:08.800
anecdote about a cable tv producer who said look our people don't even regard us as news they regard us as
00:31:15.520
comfort which then will justify all sorts of things that you might do journalistically if you're like
00:31:21.860
hey it turns out we're not uh even reporting the news here you know and the fact that you have to take
00:31:27.760
such great pains i mean you're acutely aware of the kind of pressures that some of these media figures
00:31:33.940
and organizations would be under but in their case they don't have to you know self-regulate to that
00:31:40.080
extent just be like oh what like my people like this let me give them more of that and then you'll be
00:31:44.620
thanked for it and paid more for it yeah at the political level what are the reforms that you
00:31:52.700
think will really change the system and the pressures that are on all of the all of the the various parties
00:31:59.860
here i'm happy to say that i can use a real life example that you're going to love sam this isn't my
00:32:07.920
book because it didn't happen yet but there was a handful of republican senators who decided to impeach
00:32:14.480
trump and only one of them is up for re-election in 2022 and that is senator lisa murkowski of alaska
00:32:24.200
she decided to if you'd like to continue listening to this conversation you'll need to subscribe at
00:32:33.560
sam harris.org once you do you'll get access to all full-length episodes of the making sense podcast
00:32:38.780
along with other subscriber only content including bonus episodes and amas and the conversations i've
00:32:45.200
been having on the waking up app the making sense podcast is ad free and relies entirely on listener
00:32:50.760
support and you can subscribe now at sam harris.org