Making Sense - Sam Harris - March 25, 2023


#313 — Apocalypse


Episode Stats

Length

35 minutes

Words per Minute

155.95079

Word Count

5,527

Sentence Count

312

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

Bart Ehrman is a distinguished professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the author of six books, including Armageddon, Misquoting Jesus, How Jesus Became God, The Triumph of Christianity, Heaven and Hell, and Most Recently, Armageddon, which is the focus of today s conversation. In this episode, Bart talks about the book of Revelation and its implications for Christian belief, particularly in the U.S., and the future of our world. He also talks about his religious upbringing and how he became a committed Christian, and why he believes that prophecy is a fundamental part of God's plan for us to live in the world as it is written in the Old and New Testaments, and that we should all be prepared for the end of the world, as viewed through the Book of Revelation. This episode is the first part of a two-part conversation with Dr. Bart Ehrmann, in which we discuss the impact of Revelation on Christian belief and the consequences of prophecy in the New Testament and the history of early Christianity. In part one of this conversation, Dr. Ehrmans talks about how he grew up in a Christian household, and explains why prophecy is so central to Christian belief. The second part of the conversation focuses on the concept of prophecy and the implications of Revelation in the Bible and the Old Testament. Armageddon, and its relevance to the Christian faith and the Christian life in the modern world, and how it relates to the Bible. the end-of-of the world prophecy that is predicted in Revelation and the Bible, and what Christians should do in the future. in the sequel to Revelation, The Last Testament, Armageddon. and The Last Epilogue, The Last Days of the Bible of Revelation and its impact on Christian faith, and how we should be prepared to live up to what we should learn from it and what we can expect in the next chapter in our lives and in our own lives and the rest of our lives. Music: " Armageddon" by Ian Dorsch and "Heaven and Hell and Hell" by Jeff Perla by Robert Kwan, by Kevin McLeod, "Heal and Talk About It (feat. by The Good News, & "The Good News and the Good News by John Piper by the Good Morning, Bad News and Goodbye, and The Bad News, and Good Morning by John Singleton


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast.
00:00:08.820 This is Sam Harris.
00:00:10.880 Just a note to say that if you're hearing this, you are not currently on our subscriber
00:00:14.680 feed and will only be hearing the first part of this conversation.
00:00:18.420 In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at
00:00:22.720 samharris.org.
00:00:24.060 There you'll find our private RSS feed to add to your favorite podcatcher, along with
00:00:28.360 other subscriber-only content.
00:00:30.540 We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore it's made possible entirely through the support
00:00:34.660 of our subscribers.
00:00:35.900 So if you enjoy what we're doing here, please consider becoming one.
00:00:46.300 Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast.
00:00:48.640 This is Sam Harris.
00:00:51.400 Okay, just a brief housekeeping here.
00:00:54.180 I just received an update from a former podcast guest.
00:00:58.360 Meg Smaker was my guest for episode 300, where we discussed her cancellation.
00:01:05.580 She's a documentarian who made a film originally titled Jihad Rehab.
00:01:11.460 It's now The Unredacted.
00:01:13.900 And if you recall, her film was accepted to the Sundance Film Festival and others, and that
00:01:19.260 she was promptly canceled for having the temerity to make a film on this topic, while being of
00:01:24.820 the wrong racial and religious identity, and anyone who heard that episode understands that
00:01:31.400 she was absolutely the wrong target of this kind of activist hysteria, having lived for
00:01:38.040 years in Yemen and having produced an entirely compassionate and balanced film.
00:01:45.000 Anyway, the response to that podcast was overwhelmingly positive, and she had a GoFundMe campaign to
00:01:53.460 help her release the film, which I think only had a few thousand dollars in it before we recorded
00:01:58.120 our interview.
00:01:59.560 And after you guys heard from Meg, very quickly she raised over three quarters of a million
00:02:04.860 dollars, so needless to say, that was a tremendous help to her.
00:02:09.720 And she's now releasing the film herself, and there are upcoming theater dates for the month
00:02:16.700 of April in New York, Washington, Chicago, Denver, Austin, San Antonio, Los Angeles, and perhaps
00:02:26.840 other cities are being added here.
00:02:28.320 Anyway, the information can all be found at jihadrehab.com.
00:02:34.280 Today I'm speaking with Bart Ehrman.
00:02:36.960 Bart is a leading authority on the New Testament and the history of early Christianity, and a
00:02:42.540 distinguished professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel
00:02:46.940 Hill.
00:02:48.060 He's the author of six New York Times bestsellers, and has written and edited more than 30 books,
00:02:53.500 including Misquoting Jesus, How Jesus Became God, The Triumph of Christianity, Heaven and
00:03:01.480 Hell, and most recently, Armageddon, which is the focus of today's conversation.
00:03:08.580 The topic today is really the end of the world, as viewed through the book of Revelation, and
00:03:15.140 more importantly, what Christians, especially in the United States, believe about prophecy and
00:03:22.360 the consequences of that belief.
00:03:24.560 It's always great to talk to Bart.
00:03:26.040 I don't tend to focus on religion much these days, and it's always amazing to be reminded
00:03:31.860 of what people specifically believe on this front.
00:03:36.600 It really is quite extraordinary, and unfortunately still all too consequential.
00:03:42.100 And now I bring you Bart Ehrman.
00:03:50.140 I am here with Bart Ehrman.
00:03:51.560 Bart, thanks for joining me again.
00:03:53.820 Ah, thanks for having me.
00:03:55.120 So you have written a new book titled Armageddon, which, I mean, I guess all the products of
00:04:01.420 biblical prophecy are attention-getting, but the concept of Armageddon is close to the
00:04:07.800 heart of, I would imagine, all evangelical Christians.
00:04:11.900 I want to track through your book because it's a discussion of Revelation, the book of Revelation,
00:04:18.700 which I've read before.
00:04:22.980 I can't say I committed much of its sequence to memory, but I want you to tell us what is
00:04:27.880 in there, and we'll talk about its implications for Christian belief, particularly in the U.S.
00:04:32.780 and also the future of our world.
00:04:35.220 But before we do, you've been on the podcast before, and we spoke about many issues related
00:04:40.460 to what we're going to touch on today.
00:04:41.840 But can you remind people of your background?
00:04:43.780 Because it's pretty relevant to understanding how you come at these topics.
00:04:48.100 Yeah, well, it is.
00:04:49.380 Because, so when I was in, I was raised in kind of a nominally Christian household, but
00:04:55.320 we weren't nominal.
00:04:56.880 We went to church.
00:04:57.680 But when I was 15, I had a born-again experience and became a very committed evangelical.
00:05:02.980 And after high school, instead of doing something kind of normal, like go to university, I went
00:05:10.120 to Moody Bible Institute, which was a bastion of fundamentalism.
00:05:14.880 And the relevance to this is that I believed that every word in the Bible was inspired by
00:05:21.520 God.
00:05:22.380 And the book of Revelation, we took as a prediction of what was soon going to happen in our lifetimes.
00:05:30.280 And so that's how I started out, as a firm believer in the Bible.
00:05:37.920 And I ended up going to Wheaton to finish my degree and did a degree in English.
00:05:42.700 And then I went off to Princeton Theological Seminary.
00:05:46.000 And when I was there, I was still studying the Bible.
00:05:48.680 It was a seminary.
00:05:49.540 It's a Presbyterian seminary.
00:05:51.000 But it tended to be more liberal in its orientation.
00:05:54.000 And the professors there, by and large, didn't think that the Bible is infallible or inerrant.
00:06:00.160 They thought that there are mistakes in the Bible and contradictions.
00:06:03.780 And it took me a long time to get my head around that, because I just didn't believe
00:06:09.380 it at first.
00:06:10.020 But then eventually, as I started reading the New Testament more in the original Greek,
00:06:14.720 and I started reading the Old Testament in Hebrew, I started realizing there really are
00:06:19.220 problems here.
00:06:20.680 And so I gave up my view of the inerrancy of the Bible.
00:06:25.100 I remained a liberal Christian for a long time, but in the midst of giving up the idea
00:06:29.960 of inerrancy, I gave up the idea that the book of Revelation is predicting what's really
00:06:35.440 going to be happening soon.
00:06:37.220 And so for a long time, I had the kind of standard liberal Christian view, which is that
00:06:41.840 the book of Revelation is not a literal description of the future, but a kind of a book of hope
00:06:48.520 that those who are being oppressed for being righteous now will be rewarded later.
00:06:54.000 Not that it's a literal description of what will happen, but it's an apocalyptic sense
00:06:59.380 that at the end, God's going to make right everything that's wrong.
00:07:03.340 And so it's supposed to be a book of hope.
00:07:05.900 And so that's what I held for a long time, until about five years ago.
00:07:08.800 I really started studying Revelation, and I thought, you know, both of those views, they're
00:07:14.760 both wrong.
00:07:15.700 It's absolutely not talking about our future the way almost everybody thinks it is, but
00:07:20.400 it's also not really a book of hope.
00:07:23.460 It's a violent, wrathful book and about getting revenge.
00:07:28.960 And so I've completely changed my view about it.
00:07:33.360 Yeah.
00:07:33.660 If memory serves, Jesus comes back, and he's not in a good mood, and he's really not one
00:07:37.880 for turning the other cheek.
00:07:39.120 No.
00:07:40.680 He's introduced as the lamb that was slain, and that makes you think, starting off, that
00:07:46.840 well, so this will be a book about how, you know, Jesus suffered violence from others,
00:07:51.500 and it'll be a book supporting that approach to nonviolence.
00:07:56.020 But it doesn't take long before you realize that this lamb who was slain is coming back
00:08:01.380 for vengeance.
00:08:02.460 He's out for blood, and that's what he gets.
00:08:05.380 So let's define a few terms before we get into the book itself, because I realize I think
00:08:11.860 I'm using one of these common terms inaccurately.
00:08:15.820 The term apocalypse, which I gather is just a synonym for revelation, has come to mean,
00:08:23.460 and I think common parlance, it's more or less synonymous with a calamity, you know, and
00:08:29.300 a point of no return.
00:08:30.840 It's like the apocalypse is the end of the world, and it's just a confusion based on
00:08:37.680 the fact that that's what is being described in revelation?
00:08:41.100 Yeah, more or less.
00:08:42.440 You're right.
00:08:43.300 I mean, the word apocalypse is a Greek word, apocalypsis, and it means something like an
00:08:49.680 unveiling or a revealing.
00:08:51.820 The Latin equivalent is revelation, revelatio.
00:08:56.800 And so they're just—in Latin, it'd be revelation, and in Greek, it'd be apocalypse.
00:09:02.020 And I think what happened was that this term, apocalypse, came to be applied to an entire
00:09:08.300 literary genre from the ancient world, which people don't write in this genre anymore.
00:09:14.020 But in these apocalypses, Jewish and Christian apocalypses, they often talked about the crises
00:09:20.120 that were coming and about how in the end it would be okay, but for now, it's just going
00:09:26.700 to be hell on earth.
00:09:28.360 And so the apocalypse came to refer to this period of hell on earth before it was resolved.
00:09:35.300 And it's because that's what these apocalypses discuss, and so that's how the term then shifted
00:09:40.640 to mean the end.
00:09:42.280 Right, but do you think that's an appropriate usage now, or is that a corruption of the term
00:09:47.880 that we should avoid?
00:09:48.880 Because, for instance—
00:09:49.860 No, no, I think it's fine.
00:09:51.760 I think the term has morphed into that.
00:09:54.560 And just like a lot of terms mean a variety of things in different contexts, this term usually
00:10:00.000 when we say the apocalypse is coming, that's what we mean.
00:10:03.620 Right, right.
00:10:04.520 Then I will not issue any retractions over phrases like a misinformation apocalypse that
00:10:10.540 I was worrying about with social media.
00:10:12.280 Right.
00:10:13.140 What about the term Armageddon?
00:10:15.080 Armageddon is a term made up by the author of Revelation.
00:10:19.980 It is based on a couple of Hebrew words.
00:10:23.520 It's referring to the valley outside of Megiddo.
00:10:27.420 Megiddo, so Armageddon, Megiddo.
00:10:29.740 Megiddo is a town in Israel that you can still visit.
00:10:35.220 Anybody who visits Israel can see it.
00:10:38.060 And it's a place outside of this town, this city.
00:10:41.880 There was a place where a lot of major battles happened in the Old Testament.
00:10:47.360 And Armageddon in the book of Revelation is the place where the final battle will take
00:10:53.060 place, where the armies of the enemies of God are gathered together, and Christ comes
00:10:59.500 from heaven with the heavenly armies to do battle.
00:11:01.900 And it's no battle.
00:11:04.480 Christ wipes them all out, quite simply.
00:11:09.660 So it's the site of the final battle.
00:11:13.100 And so that, too, has come to mean something like the ultimate end of the world.
00:11:18.380 Well, let's talk about Revelation and what we know about it as a book, and it's the history
00:11:24.500 of its inclusion or not in the canon.
00:11:28.420 What do we know about John of Patmos, who supposedly authored it?
00:11:32.900 Well, I think the person that we call John of Patmos really did author it.
00:11:37.980 One of the things about these apocalypses, this ancient genre, is that usually they're
00:11:43.400 written pseudonymously.
00:11:44.540 Normally, the person claims to be some famous person from the past.
00:11:49.720 And so we have an apocalypse of Abraham, the father of the Jews, or an apocalypse of Enoch,
00:11:56.260 this man who never died.
00:11:57.920 Or we even have an apocalypse of Adam, as in Adam and Eve, who wrote an apocalypse.
00:12:04.000 And the reason they picked these ancient spiritual figures is because these books contain revelations
00:12:10.240 of the secrets, the divine secrets, that are going to make sense of the chaos that's happening
00:12:16.400 down here on Earth.
00:12:18.020 And who better to be given a revelation than one of these people?
00:12:22.980 So the apocalypse of John is somewhat unusual because the person tells us his name.
00:12:27.960 His name's John.
00:12:29.040 But he doesn't tell us which John he is.
00:12:32.740 John was a common name in Judaism at the time.
00:12:35.860 And this person appears to be someone known to his audience.
00:12:41.100 He does not claim to be the disciple John, John the son of Zebedee, one of Jesus' disciples.
00:12:47.140 The book ended up being included in the New Testament because people ended up thinking
00:12:52.140 that it was that John.
00:12:53.960 But already in early Christianity, some of the scholars realized, yeah, it's not the same
00:12:59.980 person who wrote the Gospel of John, for example.
00:13:02.300 So all we know about this John of Patmos is what we find in the book, which is that he
00:13:07.260 appears to be riding from the island of Patmos, which is off the west coast of what's now Turkey.
00:13:12.900 And he says he's there for the word of God, and that's usually taken to mean that he's
00:13:18.600 been exiled as, you know, for he's being persecuted and has been exiled for his Christian activities.
00:13:25.580 But he doesn't actually say that.
00:13:27.620 And so it's not completely clear why he's on Patmos, but it has something to do with
00:13:32.380 his Christian ministry.
00:13:34.280 And one thing that struck me in your book was the claim that the Greek in the book isn't
00:13:41.300 very good, right?
00:13:42.620 And this put me in mind of something Nietzsche wrote.
00:13:45.780 I forget where this aphorism occurs.
00:13:48.500 But he said it was clever of God to learn Greek when he wanted to become an author and not
00:13:54.760 to learn it better.
00:13:55.540 And I always took that as just, you know, Nietzsche being snide.
00:13:59.440 But you say that the Greek text actually is kind of substandard Greek.
00:14:06.100 Yeah.
00:14:06.440 So Nietzsche, as you know, started out teaching classics.
00:14:10.380 And so he was actually, he was very, very good at Greek.
00:14:13.000 And he, and the Greek of the entire New Testament was often lambasted in the ancient world by ancient
00:14:19.860 literary elite as being really kind of second rate.
00:14:23.080 And, and most of, most of the New Testament is second rate by high literary standards, but
00:14:28.940 the book of Revelation is far beyond that.
00:14:31.560 It's bad.
00:14:33.040 The last time I taught a, I've got an adjunct appointment in the classics department here
00:14:38.040 at UNC.
00:14:39.620 And a few years ago, I was teaching an advanced undergraduate class on the New Testament Greek.
00:14:44.080 And one of the assignments I gave them is I had them read chapter one of Revelation and
00:14:50.080 to list all of the grammatical mistakes.
00:14:53.580 Not just, not just bad Greek, you know, not just like not very good, but actually bad,
00:14:59.260 mistaken Greek.
00:15:00.220 Like, this author just doesn't write well.
00:15:02.840 And the, the theory that most people have for that is that his native language was maybe
00:15:10.820 Aramaic or some kind of Semitic language and that Greek is his second language.
00:15:15.540 And so he's not as good at it.
00:15:17.560 That's, that's what I used to teach too.
00:15:19.400 But the more I looked into it, the more I realized it's not that this, it's not that
00:15:23.760 he's showing that he normally could speak a Semitic language.
00:15:26.500 It's that he just doesn't write very well.
00:15:28.380 And that's not, that's not weird.
00:15:30.260 Most people don't write very well.
00:15:32.100 So, you know, you shouldn't expect that just because somebody can write Greek, it means
00:15:36.020 they're going to be able to write well.
00:15:37.780 And I think he's just somebody who's not a good writer.
00:15:40.880 Well, so what have fundamentalists done with this inconvenient detail that this text that
00:15:47.320 is supposedly inerrant and directly inspired by the creator of the universe shows in its
00:15:54.300 original, the language of its original composition, less than perfect mastery of the language.
00:16:01.820 It's really quite interesting.
00:16:03.360 There are, there are biblical scholars, not just fundamentalists, but others too, who, who
00:16:08.880 have explanations for this.
00:16:11.140 One explanation that gets floated around is that this author actually could write very
00:16:17.320 good Greek and they point to some passages where the Greek's pretty good.
00:16:22.320 And so they say, well, if he could write Greek well, then it must mean that he's choosing
00:16:25.840 not to.
00:16:27.480 And so one theory is that this author, because he's giving such a counter-cultural message
00:16:34.660 that he's writing it in street lingo, that he's, you know, and that he's, he's trying,
00:16:41.260 you know, to sound kind of counter-cultural.
00:16:44.200 That's, it's an interesting idea.
00:16:45.800 I actually considered it for a while, but it just isn't true.
00:16:49.620 We, we know nothing about Greek street lingo to begin with.
00:16:52.960 So there's no way to establish that that's what, what it would, that this is what it would
00:16:57.440 look like.
00:16:57.980 But apart from that, you know, even some of my not best students can sometimes construct
00:17:04.720 good sentences.
00:17:06.000 It doesn't mean they always can.
00:17:07.820 But, and I, so I, so I don't think there's much of an explanation, but they, they usually
00:17:13.720 just say something like, you know, God is, God's giving him the absolute right idea.
00:17:18.800 So the words are right, even if the grammar's wrong.
00:17:21.580 Hmm.
00:17:22.520 Okay.
00:17:24.360 You don't sound confused.
00:17:25.340 You can imagine how that lands with an atheist over here, but.
00:17:29.360 Yeah.
00:17:29.540 Well, I'm an atheist too.
00:17:30.640 It doesn't land well with me either.
00:17:32.900 Okay.
00:17:33.340 So let's talk about how the world ends, according to this text.
00:17:38.300 I don't know in what sort of detail you want to track through it, but just give us the story
00:17:43.400 of Jesus's return as described in Revelation.
00:17:48.440 Yeah.
00:17:48.700 So the book describes itself as a book about the wrath of God and the Lamb, the Lamb being
00:17:56.300 Jesus.
00:17:58.180 The way, the way it works is really not that complicated.
00:18:02.540 Most, most, I mean, the reality is most people avoid the book of Revelation, except for the
00:18:07.320 people who want to see what's going to be happening next year sometime.
00:18:10.300 The people who are fundamentalists, who are interpreting it in order to show that, you
00:18:15.900 know, what's going to happen in our near future.
00:18:17.880 Most other people just avoid it because it just seems so weird and bizarre.
00:18:21.540 And my experience is that most students, or most others, are afraid of it because it's
00:18:27.020 so weird.
00:18:27.840 But in fact, it's not hard to follow if you're just given the roadmap.
00:18:32.200 Remind me, when was it included in the Bible?
00:18:35.000 Well, that's hard to say because the Bible was never, there was never a vote or anything
00:18:40.220 about which books would be in.
00:18:42.280 It was widely debated for the first several centuries.
00:18:45.960 And it wasn't until the fourth century that the majority of church leaders started agreeing
00:18:51.220 that it was canonical scripture.
00:18:54.180 So it was floating around and it was highly, highly controversial.
00:18:58.580 Not for reasons that we would think of today.
00:19:00.900 Today, the reasons we find it controversial is because of all the blood and violence.
00:19:05.660 But that wasn't so much the problem.
00:19:09.300 The way it works here is that John is given a vision of the heavenly realm.
00:19:13.720 This is typical in ancient apocalypses.
00:19:16.320 The prophet is taken up into heaven to see how the realities up there make sense of what's
00:19:22.260 happening down here.
00:19:24.240 In chapter 4, John goes up and he goes into the throne room of God.
00:19:29.680 And God is holding, God's on the throne, he sees God on the throne, holding a scroll that
00:19:36.380 has seven seals on it.
00:19:38.640 So it's this writing that's been sealed with seven seals.
00:19:41.640 And the scroll is taken by the Lamb, the Christ image, and Christ starts breaking the seals.
00:19:48.440 And every time he breaks one of the seals, a catastrophe hits the earth, usually a very
00:19:54.260 nasty catastrophe.
00:19:55.360 When he breaks the seventh seal, then there's an introduction to seven angels who each has
00:20:02.740 a trumpet, and they blow their trumpets.
00:20:05.360 And with the blowing of each trumpet, more disasters happen.
00:20:09.400 And when the seventh angel blows the seventh trumpet, we're introduced to seven angels who
00:20:15.420 have bowls on their shoulders of God's wrath, and they pour God's wrath out on the earth.
00:20:20.780 So by this time, you've had a threefold series of seven disasters each.
00:20:27.640 And after that, even God's had enough.
00:20:30.840 And he arranges for the Battle of Armageddon, where his chief enemy, called the Beast, which
00:20:37.680 is the Antichrist figure, marshals his armies.
00:20:41.160 Christ comes forth from heaven with his armies, slaughters the Beast and the armies of earth.
00:20:47.220 And then that introduces a thousand-year rule of Christ here on earth, just with the martyrs
00:20:55.220 of Jesus, following which there's a final judgment.
00:20:59.080 Everybody who's ever lived is raised from the dead and faces judgment.
00:21:04.780 Those who are on God's side are rewarded.
00:21:08.860 Those who are opposed to God are thrown into a lake of burning sulfur.
00:21:13.600 And they don't live there forever.
00:21:16.240 They're not being tormented forever.
00:21:17.640 They're destroyed there.
00:21:18.780 That's how he kills everybody on earth, which is 99% of the population that's ever lived.
00:21:24.680 And then the saints are given a new heaven and a new earth.
00:21:29.700 A Jerusalem descends from heaven, a new Jerusalem that is 1,500 miles cube.
00:21:37.540 And it's solid gold with gates of pearl.
00:21:42.200 And they live there happily ever after.
00:21:45.080 Well, it's all so reasonable.
00:21:47.160 It's hard to know where to start to doubt it.
00:21:51.040 So let's define a few more terms that will be familiar to people, many of whom who have
00:21:59.780 not even opened this part of the Bible, because they've just been received into the common
00:22:05.740 conception of American Christianity in particular.
00:22:09.000 Where does the rapture come into this picture?
00:22:12.040 Ah, yes.
00:22:12.960 This is what I start with in my book.
00:22:14.520 Because when I was a fundamentalist Christian, I believed that the rapture was going to be
00:22:20.260 coming soon.
00:22:21.420 The rapture is the doctrine that is found in conservative evangelical and fundamentalist
00:22:28.020 circles that says that Jesus is coming back from heaven to take his followers out of the
00:22:35.640 world before all these disasters hit.
00:22:38.840 And so the idea is that surely, you know, the true followers of Jesus aren't going to have
00:22:42.720 to experience this, and so Jesus takes them out.
00:22:45.880 The word rapture comes from a Latin word, which means to be snatched up.
00:22:51.800 And so the idea is that Jesus returns, snaps up all the Christians up to heaven, and then
00:22:59.720 all hell breaks out on earth.
00:23:01.780 And this period of chaos and suffering that the good Christians will be able to avoid by
00:23:07.240 being raptured is called the tribulation?
00:23:09.660 In evangelical fundamentalist circles, yes.
00:23:12.320 It's called the tribulation, and in those circles, it's to last for seven years.
00:23:17.960 And so it's a seven-year tribulation.
00:23:20.380 When I was a student in the 1970s, we thought the rapture was coming soon, and there was all
00:23:27.180 this talk about how we didn't want to be left behind, because that would be a very bad thing.
00:23:33.620 And there was a movie that was called Thief in the Night that came out in something like
00:23:40.000 1972, a very bad, low-budget movie.
00:23:43.260 But it was about the rapture having happened, and the people who were left behind are controlled
00:23:49.820 by the Antichrist, including the liberal Christians who didn't believe in the rapture.
00:23:54.560 And so this scared the daylights out of all of us.
00:23:58.780 And so that ended up developing in the 1990s with this series, the Left Behind series, that
00:24:05.600 was written by Tim LaHaye and Philip Jenkins.
00:24:09.420 That by the time Tim LaHaye, Timothy LaHaye died in whatever it was a few years ago, there
00:24:15.220 had been 80 million copies of this thing sold.
00:24:17.900 And there's been very interesting research on it, showing that most people who read it
00:24:22.560 simply assumed it's what the Bible says.
00:24:25.320 And so, which returns me to your question, where is all of this in the book of Revelation?
00:24:30.760 And the startling answer is, it's not in Revelation at all.
00:24:35.440 There is nothing about the rapture in the book of Revelation.
00:24:39.220 This is a—the rapture had never been conceptualized until the 1830s.
00:24:47.900 So throughout the entire history of Christianity until the 1830s, nobody had ever thought of
00:24:53.980 the rapture, but it came into existence then and took over evangelical Christianity, first
00:25:00.060 in England, and then here in America.
00:25:02.940 So on what basis did that doctrine appear?
00:25:07.380 It's a little bit complicated, but there's a man named John Henry Darby who founded this
00:25:13.080 small group of—it's kind of like a denomination, a small denomination called
00:25:17.900 the Plymouth Brethren.
00:25:20.180 And it was in the 1830s—about 1830 he started this group.
00:25:24.600 And they were—they're very hardcore Bible believers.
00:25:29.300 And he thought that when you read the Bible carefully, you can see that the Bible is set
00:25:36.140 up to show that God deals with the human race differently at different periods of time.
00:25:42.840 And so when he deals with Adam and Eve, he just tells them, don't eat the fruit off of
00:25:48.100 this tree, and that's it.
00:25:50.300 They do eat the fruit, and so that messes everything up.
00:25:53.500 And so later he sends a flood because there's sin all through the world.
00:25:57.000 He needs to destroy the world.
00:25:58.760 And then he tells Noah that he needs to institute government.
00:26:03.220 And so he tells Noah, if anybody kills someone else, it's the death penalty.
00:26:08.620 And so that goes along.
00:26:09.740 The idea of conscience and government go on for a while until Abraham comes, and then
00:26:14.560 he gives Abraham a promise that there's going to be—that his descendants will be the people
00:26:22.080 of God.
00:26:23.000 And so at every point, things are changing depending on what God does at the moment.
00:26:27.040 He gives Moses the law, finally, and then people are under the law until Jesus comes, and Jesus
00:26:32.740 saves them from the law.
00:26:34.540 And so there are these periods of time that God deals with people differently depending
00:26:39.000 on the moment.
00:26:40.120 And so there are seven of these periods, and they're called dispensations.
00:26:44.780 And these—at the end of the sixth dispensation, at the end of the Christian period, God sends
00:26:51.160 Jesus to take everyone out.
00:26:53.160 There's this hell on earth, and then there's the millennium, a thousand-year rule of Christ.
00:26:59.600 And so what Darby wanted to argue is that God is certainly not going to have his righteous
00:27:06.740 people suffer through this tribulation before the millennium, so he takes them out of the
00:27:11.540 world.
00:27:12.280 So he came up with this thing.
00:27:13.340 He called it the secret rapture, because he said the Bible says no one knows when it
00:27:19.260 will happen, so it's a secret when it will happen.
00:27:22.620 And so it's the secret rapture.
00:27:25.040 And then that ended up becoming a popular view over a long period of time.
00:27:30.940 And there's this distinction between premillennialism and postmillennialism, which offer a very different
00:27:37.580 picture of the end times.
00:27:39.840 How is there debate about which is true here?
00:27:43.260 Isn't there just a clear description as to the sequencing here?
00:27:46.360 I mean, you might want to define what the difference is.
00:27:48.320 Well, it weirdly—you know, part of my book is trying to show how all of these things actually
00:27:54.680 are closely connected with social and political realities in the modern world.
00:27:59.120 And one of the very strange things is that this kind of thinking actually started with
00:28:04.460 the French Revolution.
00:28:05.320 When the French Revolution hit, theologians in England were very, very, you know, upset
00:28:12.680 and thought, this is surely an indication that the end is almost here.
00:28:16.520 This started the modern idea that the Bible is predicting the imminent end.
00:28:22.300 For most of history, not just the book of Revelation, but the entire Bible was not interpreted as a
00:28:29.360 prediction of our future, but with the craziness of the French Revolution, the chaos and the slaughter,
00:28:37.080 theologians started saying, look, this is what was predicted.
00:28:40.800 That view came over to America, and especially in America, there was a much more positive outlook
00:28:47.040 on the future.
00:28:48.360 Technology was developing, sciences were developing, the Enlightenment was hitting America, and there
00:28:56.560 were theologians like Jonathan Edwards, who's most famous for his sermon, Sinners in the
00:29:03.120 Hands of an Angry God.
00:29:04.940 But he was actually—he was a real intellectual.
00:29:08.140 He was trained in philosophy and in science, and he went to Yale when he was something like,
00:29:14.200 I don't know, 13.
00:29:15.140 He was a really smart guy.
00:29:17.880 And he developed the idea that the way we are improving here on Earth, and especially in
00:29:24.180 America, we are moving toward the kingdom of God, we are going to be implementing the kingdom
00:29:30.220 of God, that this was God's plan all along, that America would introduce the world into
00:29:36.300 a period of peace and prosperity, and that that would be the millennium that the Bible
00:29:42.160 is talking about.
00:29:42.940 It's not a literal thousand-year reign of Christ.
00:29:45.880 It's the glories we're going to be bringing in by our advances.
00:29:49.720 In that understanding of things, Jesus was going to come back, but he would come back
00:29:54.160 after the millennium in order to bring eternal life here on Earth, so that it wouldn't just
00:30:01.220 be people would live and die in this great kingdom, but that it would be an eternal kingdom.
00:30:06.920 And so Jesus would come after the millennium, and that was post-millennialism.
00:30:11.740 That kind of optimism swept through a lot of Christianity through the 19th century, and
00:30:19.200 it took a very serious hit with World War I, where it turned out that the advances in technology
00:30:26.660 led to things like machine guns, and the realities of war became apparent, and it started looking
00:30:34.920 like we're not really improving things by our advances.
00:30:40.420 Then, of course, there was a depression, and then there was a Second World War, and atomic
00:30:45.960 bombs drop, and people basically gave up on post-millennialism then.
00:30:51.300 They said, we are not heading toward the kingdom.
00:30:54.720 And a spirit of pessimism came in.
00:30:57.880 The pessimism had started back with Derby back in the 1830s, but now just about everybody
00:31:03.420 bought into it, that in fact, this world's getting worse and worse, not better and better,
00:31:08.100 and it's going to continue getting worse until real craziness hits.
00:31:13.340 And so the idea then was that Jesus is coming back not after we develop a millennium, but
00:31:19.640 before the millennium, because we're not going to develop it.
00:31:23.260 What's going to happen is Jesus will take his followers out of the world, and then after
00:31:28.540 this chaos happens for seven years, he will then return and start the millennium.
00:31:32.920 And then the final judgment is after that.
00:31:36.960 And so the idea is that Jesus returns before the millennium, not afterwards.
00:31:41.080 So that's pre-millennial.
00:31:43.460 Yeah, it's interesting, because they have enormously different ethical and political consequences,
00:31:49.400 these views.
00:31:50.120 So if you're a pre-millennialist, fundamentalist, and you're eager for Jesus to come back and
00:31:57.720 set the world straight, you look at the chaos of human events, and no matter how bad things
00:32:04.340 get, there's always this silver lining.
00:32:06.800 Like, the worse things are, the better they are on some level, because it's not until the
00:32:11.400 wheels completely come off that Jesus returns.
00:32:15.200 Whereas if you're a post-millennialist, you know that he's not going to come back until
00:32:19.620 we actually manage to build something like a paradise here on Earth and maintain it for a
00:32:24.360 thousand years, right?
00:32:25.460 So it's a very different expectation of the fulfillment of prophecy, and it's a very different
00:32:30.220 political and ethical project in the meantime.
00:32:33.460 Are there any post-millennialists left?
00:32:36.000 Yeah, well, the fundamentalists are all pre-millennialists.
00:32:39.500 But there are, you know, there are, you know, Christianity is a very diverse phenomenon throughout the
00:32:44.840 world, and especially in America.
00:32:46.460 And most liberal Christians don't subscribe to this, like mainline Christians, you know,
00:32:53.240 just the mainline Protestant denominations, you know, Methodists, and Presbyterian, Episcopalian,
00:32:58.260 et cetera, et cetera.
00:32:58.900 They don't subscribe to these things.
00:33:00.760 And they tend to have a much stronger social agenda as a result, because they think we need
00:33:05.840 to improve our lot here.
00:33:07.440 And they tend not to even think or talk about millennial issues.
00:33:11.400 They think the Book of Revelation is a symbolic book.
00:33:15.520 It's filled with metaphor.
00:33:16.740 It's not meant to be taken as a description of things that are actually going to happen.
00:33:21.560 Those who do think that it's actually going to happen tend to be premillennialist.
00:33:26.160 And some of them, some of the fundamentalist leaders are quite anxious for things to get
00:33:32.200 worse and worse, and seem to be rather pleased when there are major catastrophes in the world,
00:33:38.700 or major wars in the world, because this is a sign that we're near the end.
00:33:43.120 So, hallelujah, it's almost here.
00:33:45.740 How has this impacted the founding of the state of Israel and the Christian support for Israel?
00:33:52.480 I mean, there's this discussion of what you call Christian Zionism in the book, and the
00:33:58.420 fact that Israel can count on American evangelicals as their really strongest base of support, the
00:34:05.860 logic of it is fairly perverse, given the expectations of premillennialists.
00:34:10.860 Perhaps you can describe what's happening there.
00:34:13.480 Yeah, this is one of the interesting things that I deal with in the book, because it's
00:34:17.480 something that people probably wouldn't expect, that American foreign policy has long been
00:34:23.740 driven by these expectations.
00:34:26.460 If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe at
00:34:31.960 SamHarris.org.
00:34:33.280 Once you do, you'll get access to all full-length episodes of the Making Sense podcast, along
00:34:37.860 with other subscriber-only content, including bonus episodes and AMAs, and the conversations
00:34:43.380 I've been having on the Waking Up app.
00:34:45.480 The Making Sense podcast is ad-free and relies entirely on listener support, and you can subscribe
00:34:50.880 now at SamHarris.org.
00:34:56.460 The Making Sense podcast is a production of Waking Up app.