#366 — Urban Warfare 2.0
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 39 minutes
Words per Minute
167.98328
Summary
In this episode of the Making Sense Podcast, I speak with John Spencer, the Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point, and the co-Director of the Urban Warfare Project at the Western Institute at the New York University, about the nature of urban warfare in urban warfare and the Israeli response to the attack by Hamas on Tel Aviv on Oct. 7th, 2011. We cover: The nature of the attack Hamas s use of human shields What it would mean to defeat them the destruction of the Gaza tunnel system How non-combatants become combatants and other topics This one is a PSA so no paywall as always, if you find what we re doing here valuable and you want to support the podcast you can do that by subscribing by subscribing to the podcast by subscribing at makingsense.org. And now I bring you John Spencers, the author of the book, Understanding Urban Warfare. John served 25 years in the U.S. military as an infantry soldier and officer, and then spent two combat deployments to IAEA, both in the invasion and the invasion of ISRAEL. He left the military in 2018 and took full direction of his new job to become the chair of the Strategy Center at WIPE, where he became the Director of Strategy at WITHDRAWAL, a research center where he travels the world into combat zones to understand urban warfare, and urban warfare. You can find out more about John s background and his research, and how he got into the field, by listening to his experiences, by visiting combat zones around the world in real time, and in his travels around the globe, and what he s been studying urban warfare . If you find yourself interested in the subject matter, you can subscribe to the making sense podcast, then you ll get access to all sorts of things, including the latest in the latest news about urban warfare! Thanks for listening to the Making sense Podcast, making sense? -Samharris (Make sense) by Jon Spencer Jon Spencers ( ) Sam Harris ( ) Jon's LinkedIn Jonathan Spencer ( ) Samharris ( ) . Jon's profile John's profile ( , Jon Sperter ( ) Sam Harris ( ), Timestamps: ( ) ,
Transcript
00:00:00.000
welcome to the making sense podcast this is sam harris well it's been pretty crazy out there
00:00:28.160
on college campuses i will have much more to say about that shortly but today i'm bringing you a
00:00:35.140
podcast that i promised in a previous episode where i said i would talk to someone who is an
00:00:40.800
expert in urban warfare who could help me analyze just what has gone on in gaza today i'm speaking
00:00:48.200
with john spencer john currently serves as the chair of urban warfare studies at the modern war
00:00:53.700
institute at west point he is the co-director of the urban warfare project and host of the urban
00:00:59.740
warfare project podcast he's also a founding member of the international working group on
00:01:05.660
subterranean warfare john served 25 years in the army having held ranks from private to sergeant
00:01:12.900
first class and second lieutenant to major he was an active duty army officer during two combat tours
00:01:20.780
in iraq his research focuses on military operations in dense urban areas megacities
00:01:27.380
and urban and subterranean warfare john also holds a master of policy management from georgetown
00:01:33.760
university and his writing has appeared in the new york times the wall street journal the washington
00:01:39.920
post foreign policy and many other publications and he's the author of the book understanding urban
00:01:47.180
warfare john and i cover israel's response to october 7th from top to bottom we discuss the nature of
00:01:54.700
hamas's attacks on october 7th what was most surprising about them the difficulty in distinguishing
00:02:00.940
hamas from the rest of the population in gaza combatants as a reflection of a society's values
00:02:07.180
how many people have been killed so far in gaza the proportion of combatants and non-combatants
00:02:13.580
the double standards to which the idf is held the worst criticism that can be made of israel and the idf
00:02:19.900
so far intentions versus results what is unique about the war in gaza hamas's use of human shields
00:02:29.100
what it would mean to defeat them what the idf has accomplished so far the destruction of the gaza
00:02:35.580
tunnel system the details of underground warfare the rescue of hostages how non-combatants become
00:02:43.020
combatants how difficult it is to interpret videos of combat what victory would look like the likely
00:02:50.460
aftermath of the war a possible war with hezbollah iran's attack on israel and what to do about iran
00:02:57.820
and other topics this one is a psa so no paywall as always if you find what we're doing here valuable
00:03:07.180
and you want to support the podcast you can do that by subscribing at samharris.org
00:03:21.500
i am here with john spencer john thanks for joining me
00:03:24.460
sam thanks for having me so uh i will have introduced you in the the intro here but um
00:03:31.900
perhaps you can state what your background is and and how you come to this conversation
00:03:38.300
sure so i spent 25 years in the u.s military as a infantry soldier and officer and then spent
00:03:46.460
two combat deployments to iraq both in the invasion and at the end but then i went you
00:03:52.620
know throughout my career i went my last job was teaching strategy at west point where i stood up a
00:03:57.020
research center and started researching you know all urban battles and i became this chair of urban
00:04:03.820
warfare studies that i am now where really when i left the military i began this endeavor to travel
00:04:09.980
the world into combat zones to understand them in real time that has led me to where i am now where i
00:04:15.660
can uniquely provide people i hope understanding of the israel's war against tamas in gaza which is
00:04:23.500
overwhelmingly urban which is what i specialize in yes i want to get your expertise here on on urban
00:04:30.380
warfare and um use that to analyze what's happening in gaza and what what isn't happening there's i think
00:04:38.220
there's a lot of misinformation about the nature of the war and how it compares to other conflicts where
00:04:44.780
else have you witnessed urban warfare beyond being in your own tours in the military when i left the military
00:04:54.060
in 2018 and really took full direction of my new job to study it academically i started i went to
00:05:02.540
mumbai to study the 2008 terror attacks which it was on a you know 10 terrorists took down a whole
00:05:08.540
city i went to israel multiple times studying past wars so like the 2002 battle of janine the
00:05:17.260
the battle of suez city when the full-scale invasion of ukraine by russia started i started going
00:05:23.340
into ukraine so i've been four times since the war began studying the urban battles so
00:05:29.020
kiev bakhmut mariopol and then of course i've been to gaza twice since the beginning of the
00:05:35.580
israel hamas war interesting that you went to mumbai that's something i've thought a lot about
00:05:41.500
in the aftermath of october 7th because it's it's really this pure case of jihadism that has
00:05:47.820
nothing to do with israel obviously has very little to do with jews except for the fact that they did
00:05:52.860
managed to find some jews to kill in mumbai but um i'm interested to hear what that was like before
00:06:00.140
we hit our main topic sure i mean i i also i forgot to mention that i also went into nagarna karabakh
00:06:06.620
there was a war there in 2020 and there's been another one but i went in after that war to
00:06:12.220
it ended in a major urban battle over the battle of shusha but going back to mumbai i mean it was
00:06:17.900
just fascinating and the planning that went into it and like you said i'm one of they basically hit
00:06:24.060
five targets simultaneously at the exact same your moments with small teams of terrorists dressed as
00:06:32.220
civilians trying to blend in and one of them being the habad two hotels a train station but overwhelmed
00:06:39.420
the systems and there are you know totally at a different scale a lot of similarities between the
00:06:44.700
invasion of israel on october 7th and the mumbai attacks on how it kind of overloaded the system
00:06:51.500
yeah yeah that was um it's all one thing that's fascinating about this is that um to my knowledge
00:07:00.220
india did not respond am i right about that at least i haven't heard about what india has done in
00:07:06.700
response not in a direct action because you know it was verified by an intelligence that it was a
00:07:14.060
pakistani-led operation so really a state-backed operation but using these proxy forces you know and
00:07:21.900
this was a you know that traveled from pakistan into india to conduct the attack there was a lot of
00:07:27.340
political things that happened to include you know demanding responsibility but there was such
00:07:32.620
plausible deniability it was literally frustrating with the you know the terrorist group who did it
00:07:38.060
but you're right no direct action as there are lots of you know history there between the india
00:07:43.900
and pakistan and the concern of just like we've seen other places the concern of escalation
00:07:48.860
in that direct attack but there's a this is the kind of the iran situation in the middle east too
00:07:53.900
there is always this plausible deniability even if in these cases where it can be proven that
00:07:58.700
that the terrorists were trained financed and launched by a state actor okay so on to
00:08:08.220
october 7th and gaza i was thinking we would start our conversation with the war in gaza just so post
00:08:16.700
israel's response to october 7th but is there anything you want to say about october 7th itself
00:08:22.380
before israel did anything in response sure i think it's i i spent a lot of time walking
00:08:28.540
the ground on october 7th from my lens right as somebody who studied urban combat from mumbai to
00:08:35.980
all wars i think that the world kind of got a miss really still has it wrong on what happened on
00:08:41.420
october 7th so i i've done a lot of work on walking the ground and going to all the different sites and
00:08:46.380
understanding the scale the intention the magnitude the tactics and everything from october 7th i think the
00:08:54.060
world you know wants to put it in the terrorist bucket right to put it in the bucket with 9 11
00:08:59.740
26 11 or the mumbai attacks and other terrorist attacks and while yes it there are some similarities
00:09:05.020
but it's it's more like a full-scale invasion i mean there are over 4 000 you know both hamas and
00:09:11.660
palestinian civilians across the border between israel and gaza 22 breach sites along the border wall
00:09:18.300
4 000 4 000 rockets launched in the first few hours with the intention of moving much farther north than
00:09:25.180
they did i mean it was a and i've struggled with what was october 7th and as from a military lens it is
00:09:32.940
as clear as an invasion as you can get interesting it's somewhat confounded just optically and conceptually
00:09:41.500
by the fact that as you just pointed out that there were hamas you know fighters i mean not not
00:09:48.780
properly thought of as soldiers in in the state actor sense perhaps but they were um you know obvious
00:09:55.740
insurgents but then as you pointed out there were almost as many or even as many or more palestinian
00:10:02.300
civilians who came across the border and participated in the violence to one or another degree how do you
00:10:08.780
think about that i mean it we all want frameworks in which to think about it i think about it as in
00:10:15.180
a war lens it's hard in this situation okay what was gaza it was it a state and was this a the launch
00:10:22.540
of a state attack right it it's not so it falls into these two buckets of whether internationally armed
00:10:29.580
conflict or non-internationally armed conflict but i view it like i said as an invasion with different
00:10:35.260
forces yeah the first wave of forces were these hamas nukba some even wearing uniform forces with
00:10:42.540
clear instructions i mean they had guidebooks on how to create as much suffering they had guidebooks on
00:10:49.180
how to wear their gopro cameras there's just so much uniqueness but i view if you cross the border
00:10:54.700
i view you as a combatant really so in in war there's two categories non-combatant and a combatant and
00:11:00.780
yes you can get into like illegal combatant and all of these things but if if somebody crossed the
00:11:06.860
border from gaza into israel with the purpose of partaking in the hostilities they immediately
00:11:11.820
make themselves a combatant yeah so let's move forward into and i think as we talk here i'd like
00:11:19.980
both of us to be alert to any topics about which we think many people are confused so if i just raise
00:11:29.500
something which about which you think there there's a lot of misunderstanding out there in the public
00:11:35.260
please flag it and let's linger on it so that we don't miss any opportunities here to rectify some of
00:11:40.780
the confusion so now that the war has started we're talking now where there's been a a lull in the
00:11:47.180
fighting and and really the question the open question still perhaps it'll still be open when we air
00:11:54.060
this is whether or not is the idf is going to go into rafa i'm sure there's there's some conflict
00:12:01.260
happening even as we speak but there there's definitely been a lull in the fighting what do
00:12:05.740
we know about the war in gaza and how do we know it at this point i mean just how much how is information
00:12:12.540
getting out well how do you view the quality of the information on some level this is the most
00:12:17.900
most witnessed conflict in human history judging from social media but in other ways that you you
00:12:25.500
know we know that there's an astounding amount of misinformation and and confusion about it what
00:12:31.260
what is going on in gaza and how do we know what is going on sure i think i think that's a great question
00:12:37.260
and it's hard to say you know from from the time from october 7th till today have been how have we known
00:12:43.500
what is going on and how has that shaped our you know basically our information about the war and i
00:12:49.900
agree with you this is we used to have these terms like tick tock wars they're calling this the first
00:12:55.580
open source war after ukraine but the evolution of being able to basically be bombarded by information
00:13:03.100
not through kind of the traditional means but through social media and other aspects where we can see
00:13:09.260
into the battle continuously but we're also looking through a soda straw and a lot of people are
00:13:14.060
interpreting what they're seeing where i agree with you we can really start from october 7th we talked
00:13:20.220
about that on how i think people have gotten that wrong on it was a terrorist attack it was you know
00:13:25.900
oriented towards the military all these different immediate disinformation campaigns that seem to be
00:13:32.700
be gaining traction to sticking even in israel's response but once you know on october 8th israel
00:13:40.620
declared war against tamas so that's a really great framework a state because they went on the news and
00:13:47.420
made a formal declaration of war against tamas in gaza because of what happened on october 7th that's
00:13:54.060
pretty straightforward they set forth their goals which again as time has gone in different media messages or
00:14:02.380
information operations what we call them you know social media trends or whatever there's been so
00:14:07.900
much of the truth that has been translated you asked me how do we know what we know so for like
00:14:14.460
october 7th we know because hamas uploaded all their videos a lot of time in real time so we we can
00:14:20.940
pretty much you know people were starting to make their own opinions on october 7th based on
00:14:25.020
the overwhelming information being uploaded but it's really interesting how despite even hamas's videos
00:14:31.180
everybody formed their own opinion on you know it was resistant it was oriented towards this the
00:14:36.220
military it there wasn't this you know no rape happened all these things despite the overwhelming
00:14:41.740
evidence we all had access to is all that video still up there or has it been in some ways taken down
00:14:49.340
no you can go to like you can just go to october there's actually a video i forget the name of
00:14:54.700
them like october 7th dot com and um where people have collected unfortunately all the hamas video
00:15:00.780
they can find and put it on as a record of because you know you as the thread of x or telegram whatever
00:15:07.580
it can get lost in the threads but you know people have it's all still available i saw the video that
00:15:14.300
the israeli government put together um i saw it you know back in november and it was really shocking and i
00:15:20.860
wrote about how much it it jarred me despite how much i've seen of war how much you know my own
00:15:26.220
experiences yeah i haven't seen that video and i perhaps i should i think i've been sparing myself
00:15:32.060
the experience but um what did surprise you about it one i one of the biggest surprises was just the
00:15:39.820
unique because of the fact that hamas recorded so much of the atrocities they were doing but also the
00:15:47.180
fact that you know there were so many sensors as we call them you know traffic cameras dashboard
00:15:52.060
cameras victim cell phones the what israel did which nobody has access to unless they've seen this
00:15:59.420
video was to take all those different points of view and then put them in time and location so like
00:16:06.540
if you're at the nova music festival the video shows you the hamas gopro approaching the festival
00:16:13.180
it shows you the dash camera of somebody they're trying to get away and the and of the frightened
00:16:17.740
teenager who's recording it it brings it all together which i think really creates this very
00:16:22.380
mixed reality experience of which is unique to war reporting like i've watched you know my fill of
00:16:30.860
evil things happening around the world but how this was put together i think was really unique so it
00:16:35.340
really jarred me i mean other things that i saw in the video that were very unique to me was like the
00:16:42.220
video of hamas rolling through the the border really jubilant about what they were about to do
00:16:49.580
and i've led i've led a lot of soldiers into combat and that's not normal even for you know for
00:16:54.860
soldiers for anybody to be really excited euphoric about what they were about to do and then lastly i
00:17:02.060
found some of the videos of like the children crying out in pain there's one scene where there's two
00:17:08.780
young boys um the hamas members had just killed the father they had brought them back into the house
00:17:13.980
and you can hear the boys moaning which is something i as a soldier have heard you know enemy combatants
00:17:19.420
do on the battlefield like it's like the death the death moan i call it and to hear that coming from a
00:17:24.540
boy was really traumatic but i've also seen you know innocent civilians being caught in between you know in
00:17:32.140
war and how the soldiers will overwhelmingly stop to give aid and to have a little boy crying out his
00:17:39.740
eyes missing his dad's dead and for the hamas member to be standing there like shut up be quiet
00:17:46.380
and then goes to the fridge and that's the scene that everybody talks about where he grabs the the
00:17:49.820
coke out of the fridge and starts drinking it that was really you know very unique
00:17:53.900
yeah i i was just um we're talking now and uh on the day that um cheryl sandberg released her
00:18:02.620
documentary on um uh the violence against women on october 7th that's available on youtube uh and i
00:18:10.460
just started watching it i only got maybe 15 minutes in before we had to jump on the microphones here but
00:18:17.020
it shows some of the footage which i had seen before of which many people have seen and i really think
00:18:22.380
everyone should see of of some of the hostages being dragged across the border into gaza and you
00:18:27.900
know some of the young women who almost certainly have been raped i mean there's there's one that
00:18:34.220
who's got obviously blood around her pelvic area on her pants and actually it looks like her her
00:18:40.460
achilles tendons might have been cut which is a diabolical detail if true but the thing that's so
00:18:46.780
striking about so much of this footage of the hostages being dragged across the borders that
00:18:54.780
so many of the people in the scene are absolutely ecstatic and they're you know they're you know
00:19:02.700
basically all you hear are shouts of Allahu Akbar and it's coming from you know i mean i guess many of
00:19:10.060
these people certainly some of the people are official members of hamas but judging from the
00:19:16.380
the sheer numbers in many of these shots it really seems like a lot of these people are just palestinian
00:19:23.500
civilians who are getting caught up in the in the mob violence but it does strike me as unusual i mean
00:19:30.300
it's very hard there i can imagine a lot of things you know i can imagine based on some experience of
00:19:37.100
being a victim and you know wanting vengeance and you know i can imagine being on the other side of
00:19:42.860
violence even even wrongful violence but what i find it very difficult to imagine is a scenario where
00:19:50.780
an obvious non-combatant you know in this case a girl or a mother clutching two children to her breast
00:19:58.380
being taken hostage and finding the taking of these hostages a cause for celebration right like
00:20:06.940
this is the win i've been hoping for this is the thing that's going to get me shrieking to heaven
00:20:12.700
in jubilation that we finally grabbed one of these you know mistreated girls who's you know already
00:20:20.220
bloodied may be grievously injured in some cases in some cases dead where you have people you know
00:20:24.780
rushing forward to spit upon the corpses of again in many in many cases obvious non-combatants i mean
00:20:31.260
you can you can understand it you know if this you know really fully lean into the principle of
00:20:36.300
charity here perhaps you can understand it if these are soldiers being taken hostage but when you have
00:20:42.140
a woman clutching her kids being dragged onto a motorcycle and you have people shrieking in jubilation
00:20:49.340
over this i have a um i mean i know why i think people are capable of this but it's um you know i would
00:20:58.060
say you have to believe some very specific things about the moral order in the universe and your place
00:21:03.580
in it to find these sorts of moments the fulfillment of your aspirations right and a cause for happiness not
00:21:12.620
not not grim murderous determination or sadism or but just joy and so it's something i think people
00:21:21.900
find it very hard to interpret these scenes and and i think they've just averted their their eyes from
00:21:27.180
them but they do suggest that any bright line we want to draw between you know evil mustache twirling
00:21:35.740
terrorists you know i.e the core members of hamas and other palestinians is in fact difficult to draw
00:21:45.580
i'm just wondering how you view those scenes because they do strike me as surprising in ways that echo
00:21:53.500
the surprise you just expressed over the jubilation of the of the combatants coming across the border as
00:22:00.620
as kind of a non-standard mood for soldiers yeah it's an interesting so it's not the first time i've
00:22:07.100
seen it to be truthful now those who crossed the border and engaged in the activities in any way to
00:22:13.820
include the the looters who even came forward and walked over the dead children's bodies and took their
00:22:20.380
clothing back into gaza like i'm a very law of war rule of law a realist basically so have i seen
00:22:30.060
similar of course it's this disgusting to see it reminded me of you know scenes of mogadishu 1993
00:22:39.340
the entire population celebrating the death of american soldiers fallujah 2004 the entire
00:22:45.900
seems like the entire city coming out to dismember americans burn them drag them hang them from their
00:22:54.460
bridge and celebrate it's not yes i 100 agree with you it's a massive problem with your islamic
00:23:01.660
radicalization of populations and to where you can bring yourself to be celebrating the rape of women
00:23:07.660
and taking the babies as hostages there's so many fundamental issues with that but i also draw a
00:23:16.780
clear line because i understand the history of war and this is again where i think people have gotten it
00:23:21.180
wrong they think that to think that those videos didn't lead to like israel's quest for vengeance
00:23:28.780
and and the way they act that is all stemming off of what happened on october 7th i strongly believe
00:23:35.100
from being on the ground you asked me how do i get my information or other people from being on the
00:23:40.700
ground with the idf that is also not how soldiers approach even after you know the battle of fallujah or
00:23:48.220
other incidents which is fairly similar and the difficulty of distinguishing between okay who's
00:23:53.420
a combatant or non-combatant innocent civilian it doesn't lead to nations or like the idf in this case
00:24:03.340
where no matter what they do people think they're intentionally trying to target people because of
00:24:08.540
those videos which is not the reality on the ground yeah i mean can you imagine the reverse case of
00:24:15.180
the idf dragging obvious non-combatant women and children out of gaza across the border into israel
00:24:24.780
and you know random israelis celebrating their rape and abuse it's just there's some glaring asymmetries
00:24:33.340
here which people are losing sight of there's just no i'm sure we'll get into the details of what the idf
00:24:41.740
has done and what what they may have done wrong and i really have no doubt that there are examples of
00:24:47.900
war crimes to be found in the war in gaza on the idf side because it would be it seems like it would be
00:24:54.220
impossible for some soldier or soldiers not to have gone haywire in in certain circumstances right and
00:24:59.900
this is just the nature of war as i understand it but what i don't think you would find is an appetite
00:25:06.380
among the israelis to have raped non-combatants paraded before jeering crowds in tel aviv there is
00:25:14.140
just a cultural asymmetry here that is quite glaring and almost never remarked upon 100 and i agree with
00:25:22.540
you this is really that you know the misinformation that is so shocking that what you have so much
00:25:31.340
misunderstanding of who the israelis are as in the idf the people of israel how there is an aspect of
00:25:39.180
of course the law of war i'm sure we'll talk about following the law of war in all of its intricacies in
00:25:45.020
the execution of a war but also the the moral ethical code of your society i mean militaries
00:25:52.380
are a reflection of their societies so like you're right the asymmetry here is that you think that the
00:25:57.980
israel society would be okay with any of that and clearly they're not and they want to hold soldiers
00:26:03.900
if they do go wrong and were accountable there's so much of that that is that's not who we are
00:26:09.500
that people don't understand that militaries take into war the reflection of their society's
00:26:14.300
values so there's so much misinformation out there that it becomes confusing to people who have
00:26:19.980
never been there they couldn't tell you what the the difference between gaza and and the west bank is
00:26:25.340
they they couldn't tell you what the size of israel is or what there's so much they don't know but
00:26:29.500
they form these immediate you know hardened and emphatic opinions about that's just what israel does
00:26:37.980
like what are you talking about so back to the information question let's just
00:26:44.540
focus on the the raw numbers here how many people have been killed in gaza and what is the proportion
00:26:51.580
of combatants to non-combatants and because one thing we're dealing with here is that for the longest
00:26:58.060
time people have simply been restating numbers that have come straight out of the so-called ministry of
00:27:05.580
health which is really hamas in gaza you know i don't think anyone can doubt that many thousands of
00:27:11.660
people have died and that many thousands of non-combatants have died but what what do we
00:27:16.380
know about the numbers and the proportion or do we simply actually not know with any confidence at
00:27:22.620
this point yeah it's a great question it's interesting how many times i've gotten the
00:27:26.300
question unique to this war only what is the combatant to civilian kill ratio it's just i of
00:27:34.700
course haven't studied so many urban battles can tell you what it was in the past um i can tell you for
00:27:41.180
so the question was how many have died there the answer is nobody knows but for some reason unique we
00:27:47.500
we you know war is a contest of will we have to fight what the narrative is so because unique to
00:27:54.140
this war alone and and i i don't say this based on opinion just but empirical evidence this is the
00:28:00.620
first war in history where anybody has had a running count of the civilian casualties down to the single
00:28:07.420
digit in real time i mean if you just imagine a fake running account correct i mean we're taking the
00:28:12.780
actual opinion of a third party in who is affiliated with the enemy hamas so the gaza health ministry
00:28:20.380
is a hamas because hamas wasn't just a military force it was the government and you couldn't be part of
00:28:26.300
the institution if you're not it's complex but to get a number from within the environment from the
00:28:32.300
enemy and say that's the number that the entire world runs with with no caveats one it's physically
00:28:38.220
impossible to know how many civilians have died in gaza it has never been done in the history of war
00:28:44.540
the greatest battle since world war ii was the battle of massul in 2016 and 17 and a year after
00:28:51.260
the battle the iraqi government still did not have a number in which how many civilians had died
00:28:56.620
now it went all the way from 9 000 to 40 000 the mayor of the city said it was over 40 000 because of
00:29:03.580
how many people are in the rubble how many people are unaccounted for who left and there's no report
00:29:09.340
on where they went you can imagine in a in a very dense urban environment like how could you possibly
00:29:14.860
have a number but if i ran with the numbers that we all use so let's say the gaza health ministry as
00:29:21.500
we're talking says 33 000 civilians have died actually it's not let me caveat myself is that the gaza health
00:29:29.020
ministry says that 33 000 palestinians have died in gaza since october 7th that number if we are
00:29:36.620
truthful in and we used hamas's numbers or the gaza health ministry's numbers it accounts for every
00:29:43.340
death that has happened in gaza no matter the cause it is it includes all hamas members anybody who died
00:29:50.380
of natural causes anybody who died actually from hamas's hands because of the 12 000 rockets that
00:29:57.340
hamas has launched out of gaza towards israel since october 7th 20 of those have landed inside
00:30:03.260
of gaza and killed many palestinian people of gaza but if we ran with the 33 000 which includes everybody
00:30:10.060
has died and we took israel's number because if we're going to believe hamas why don't we believe
00:30:14.380
israel who says given our battle damage assessments we believe we've killed 12 000 hamas combatants
00:30:21.020
so you subtract 12 000 per 33 000 you get about a one enemy to two if not one to one of enemy to
00:30:30.460
civilian ratio which would be historically low to any urban battle and this is a war not a battle so
00:30:37.340
it's actually really interesting how somebody will try to take a battle from the past especially the
00:30:41.900
last 30 years and compare it to the war in gaza which includes you know like 10 massive urban battles
00:30:48.540
together so that they they aggregate the numbers to kind of tell the message they want it would still
00:30:53.980
be a historically low given the all the context of urban combat where you have a civilian population
00:31:00.060
where no matter what you do many of them still stay you're trying to identify separate enemy from
00:31:06.860
civilian or combatant to non-combatant like the battle of massul where you know it took nine months for
00:31:13.740
100 000 iraqi security forces to get four to five thousand isis members out of the city and they
00:31:21.180
killed 10 000 civilians in in the process of that nine month battle to liberate the city so that's a
00:31:27.500
one to two ratio it was so but this is i mean the fact that every person in that i ever interview
00:31:34.380
asked me this question is really shocking because it's it's never been the question that's not how the
00:31:39.740
law of war works but we have this number in our head like clearly this means everything that's
00:31:45.100
going on is illegal and israel is purposely killing civilians because look how the high the number is
00:31:50.620
irrelevant of the context of the war like we're not even talking about the numbers the challenge
00:31:55.500
that the idea faced in gaza nobody wants to talk about that like the 40 000 hamas members tens of
00:32:02.620
thousands of other terrorist members buried in 400 miles of tunnels intermixed between a population
00:32:09.660
of two million who egypt won't let into egypt there's so many complexities to this battle that
00:32:15.260
no military has faced in the history of war but nobody cares they just want to know what's the civilian
00:32:19.900
death toll and there is no number yeah yeah well obviously i asked the question very much in the spirit of
00:32:27.820
echoing the the observation you just made which is that it's the very question shows how upside down
00:32:37.100
everyone's analysis of this conflict is and it and became really immediately but even before israel
00:32:44.140
responded there was already a massive distortion of moral and political priorities in how people were
00:32:52.860
thinking about the ensuing violence and i was i i just want to continue to flag what is unique about this
00:32:59.260
and and just the ways in which people focus on i mean it's almost like we have at this moment
00:33:07.980
something like a billion people maybe two billion people maybe three billion people for the first time
00:33:14.780
discovering that war itself is intolerable and the onus is on israel really and the onus is on the jews
00:33:24.300
if you want to get down to it but uh there's so there's a kind of a layer of anti-semitism here which
00:33:29.100
we can table it's really not my focus but i mean when you ask about what was it what is the origin of all
00:33:34.620
of the double standards here and the weird inversions of priorities and the you know for the first time in
00:33:40.620
human history the seizing upon details that no one ever thought about in any other conflict
00:33:45.980
you know the standards to which the idf is being held which no other army has ever been held you
00:33:51.660
know especially in the face of the challenges they're facing which we're going to talk about
00:33:56.300
which you just began to reference i.e 400 miles of tunnels the strangeness of of all of this is
00:34:03.260
something that i want to keep in view but i do also want to just simply deliver the information
00:34:08.220
insofar as we have it and to concede whatever can be conceded to the people who are horrified by
00:34:16.780
the images they're seeing coming out of gaza because it's it's understandable that people
00:34:21.980
are horrified and especially if they're for the first time looking at the evidence of war the evidence
00:34:27.580
of urban war as i've said before there really there really is no argument for the justness of any war
00:34:33.980
in the and it's even necessity that makes sense of the image of a child being pulled out of rubble
00:34:43.660
right it's unacceptable whatever the rationale for it and some billions of people are having that
00:34:50.380
experience on a hourly basis because of social media and it's all being framed in the the most
00:34:58.700
invidious way possible against israel and against you know support for israel defending itself in
00:35:05.660
this case well let's i guess a high level question here it is because of this imagery and because of
00:35:12.380
the way the discussion is being framed again largely on social media there's this widespread
00:35:19.340
allegation against israel and the idf that they're guilty not only of war crimes but the very war is itself
00:35:25.980
a crime and they're they're guilty of genocide they're guilty of the collective punishment of the
00:35:32.700
palestinians the deliberate murder of non-combatants and even the deliberate murder of journalists and aid
00:35:39.340
workers right so they're like when you have you know the the seven employees of jose andreas's uh
00:35:46.780
humanitarian organization killed it is analyzed so as to suggest that israel has intentionally
00:35:55.100
killed those aid workers as though you know the killing of those aid workers worked to the advantage
00:36:01.180
of israel in some way i mean it's just like you know it's a it would be a colossal act of self-harm
00:36:06.380
for them to have killed those aid workers on purpose given the consequences for world opinion but
00:36:13.100
people seem to effortlessly interpret every casualty as something that the idf has intended
00:36:19.660
what if anything in this downpour of disparagement of the idf and israel is true i mean what what is
00:36:29.820
the worst thing that can be honestly said about how israel has been waging its war in gaza so the only
00:36:37.980
thing that i can say would be the most honest fact-based criticism of israel is that it has done a
00:36:44.860
horrible job on fighting the counter narrative of what they're actually doing one of the main
00:36:52.220
reasons that is is because they did not embed foreign media and journalists and this is the
00:36:57.900
example i usually give when i'm teaching a class the first battle of fallujah 2004 you know four
00:37:03.500
american citizens were killed the u.s president orders the military in to get those account you know who
00:37:09.500
did it accountable the world says that there is too much use of force too many civilians are being
00:37:15.500
hurt they're being they're committing war crimes so six days into the battle the u.s military is
00:37:20.540
defeated and told to stop because of the perception the use of force very minor example of the totality
00:37:27.660
that is the war against hamas and gaza but it's a great example where they they were defeated and there
00:37:34.620
were zero media embeds in the first battle of fallujah six months later when they redid the
00:37:39.740
same operation 60 media embeds so that's the honest criticism but i could help you kind of go through
00:37:47.420
every narrative every accusation to include the targeting of journalists aid workers or civilians in
00:37:55.260
general where the u.s government not even me john spencer who's been there but doesn't have access to all
00:38:01.100
the classified information said there's based on their investigation there is zero evidence of a
00:38:06.300
single event in which israel intentionally caused harm to civilians journalists or even the world central
00:38:14.540
kitchen event where people don't want to accept the fact that accidents do happen especially in the
00:38:21.900
fog and friction of urban combat which people just don't have a clue of like of what what it actually
00:38:28.620
takes and they get to this point where they interpret situations right you and i think that was really
00:38:33.180
important you said that because even a the way that war crimes work from the ridiculous use of the word
00:38:39.740
genocide a big factor is to intention based on the information you have at the moment you take your
00:38:46.380
action not the results so everybody sees you know footage of of gaza especially northern gaza or sees
00:38:53.900
like you said the unfortunate every one of them is a travesty a civilian destiny they interpret well
00:39:01.100
of course that means israel did all that on purpose and that there was no alternative which i think could
00:39:07.340
be a a part of the conversation is that people who have no information on how war works like you said
00:39:13.340
people woke up to not the syrian war not to the last 30 years of wars not to real massacres
00:39:21.820
russia taking 20 000 babies out of ukraine they woke up to and want to start interpreting based
00:39:27.980
on their knowledge the wars that they see based on short clips and videos or they think that there's
00:39:33.740
an alternative which i actually think is i've been arguing with literally like national leaders who
00:39:39.340
have propositioned that there was another way and that's not the history of warfare one example i'll
00:39:45.260
give is there was a you know a very another news story of israel has used more 2 000 pound bombs than
00:39:53.020
any other military in the last 30 years which is a true statement but it is given as a negative
00:40:00.220
to paint the picture that israel had a choice it could have not used those bombs it could have just
00:40:05.420
not did bombing at all and the actual evidence shows that that has been a a feeling between in
00:40:13.180
many wars that if you just bomb less there'll be less damage less civilian casualties it's actually
00:40:18.940
the inverse like in the 1945 battle of manila where there were 4 000 americans and uk internees
00:40:27.180
prisoners of war being held by the japanese in the city of manila and the general general macarthur said
00:40:33.020
you no air power i don't want you destroying manila i don't want inappropriate civilian casualties
00:40:39.660
and still the the military moved forward and there were a hundred thousand civilian deaths
00:40:43.980
because of the complexity of urban combat you think that if there would have been just less
00:40:48.060
bombing or the fact that the actual nomenclature of a 2 000 pound bomb we haven't talked about it yet
00:40:53.580
but one of the things the difficulty for the idf is that the enemy there's no enemy on the surface
00:40:58.860
they're underground and they're deep underground so yes israel has used more 2 000 pound bombs because
00:41:04.940
they're the only military in the history of war who's faced an enemy so deep underground under
00:41:10.780
civilian structures in which a tool like that is the weapon that can get to that military target
00:41:18.300
okay so talk to me about i guess you can talk about urban warfare generically and guerrilla warfare
00:41:25.180
generically but what is unusual about this war what is israel facing that we didn't face in
00:41:33.180
iraq or afghanistan or didn't face to the same degree and what is novel about what they have done
00:41:42.060
in the direction of being more scrupulous more more averse to producing collateral damage than we
00:41:49.660
or any other army has been in the past sure if you're going to say just that that all that israel
00:41:55.900
has really done wrong is to fail to anticipate how colossally badly the the pr war was going to go
00:42:04.060
for them and they failed to embed journalists who could give credible real-time information about all
00:42:10.700
the efforts they're making to not kill the wrong people and i agree it's been you know i you know i
00:42:16.140
don't know if it would have mattered had they done that i certainly hope it would have mattered but
00:42:20.780
i agree that they have not done a good job at all of changing the narrative but if that's their only
00:42:28.220
crime what have they done that has been scrupulous and compassionate and beyond the usual course of
00:42:37.420
action for an army launched from a democratic state into combat sure so two easy actually things to pick
00:42:47.100
apart one is what did they face that no military has faced and what did they do that no military has
00:42:51.660
done so on what they have faced one is just the proximity to the enemy right that this is not
00:42:58.300
hundreds of miles away so if you if you want to use a u.s military example it just fails step one
00:43:04.540
just a proximity to the actual national security the existential threat so that's october 7th right but
00:43:11.100
the war is being waged in eyesight of the homes of those you know the size of the combatants so 4 000
00:43:18.780
combatants launching rockets over the head of the military so no military in modern history has faced
00:43:26.540
a combatant who is launching 12 000 rockets over their heads headed for their homes behind them the
00:43:33.180
tunnels of course so you know this this what hamas had built over 15 years hasn't been seen in war
00:43:39.980
period yes there's been tunnels in war before but the fact that there were 400 miles of tunnels ranging
00:43:45.980
from 15 feet to 250 feet underground where no military munition could reach but solely under civilian
00:43:54.220
sites so civilian homes hospitals schools u.n facilities on purpose so they could deploy this what they call this
00:44:03.820
human shield strategy because you know non-state actors terrorists whoever have learned from the
00:44:10.300
history of really you know modern wars in which you have a military who follows the law of war against a
00:44:17.180
combatant who doesn't that they use the laws which in urban combat you immediately enter and you already
00:44:23.580
have restrictions on the use of force right you can't that's the underlying thing is do not target
00:44:28.780
civilians and only target military sites and that's really hard to do in urban areas but there's
00:44:34.540
lots of rules that we can talk about on that so hamas deployed this human shield strategy but also a
00:44:41.100
human sacrifice strategy where and i don't know why the world just won't take for on its head what
00:44:49.260
hamas says like literally they tell you these things and the world's like yeah but they're
00:44:53.260
the fact that they say they want as many of their civilians to die as possible and one evidence of
00:44:59.900
that is the fact that there are 400 miles of tunnels in gaza and not one civilian is allowed in them
00:45:05.820
the entire population 2.2 million could fit in hamas's tunnels with ease where you take in another
00:45:12.860
example in another war like ukraine's war where the civilians did seek refuge in the subway tunnels and
00:45:18.460
underground and the hostages so the fact that you know that hamas immediately took over 200
00:45:23.180
40 hostages which really gets to the time variable right so in understanding the challenge
00:45:28.380
that the idea faced you have to factor in you know the rockets the tunnels the hostages which
00:45:34.300
really get to your alternatives on well just wait just pursue some other strategy and just leave your
00:45:40.540
hostages in captivity yeah so all those variables no military has faced that in modern times none and
00:45:46.940
i could you know i could go back to world war ii and give you some variables like the battle of manila
00:45:53.340
1945 the 1950 battle of seoul which will get you close but not all those variables and especially not the
00:46:00.780
variables in which israel relies on the support of the united states now all war is a contest of will
00:46:06.060
so israel knowing that of course everybody agreed it had the right to of self-defense and to launch the
00:46:12.460
war but to to know you have to maintain the will of the international community in how you respond
00:46:20.220
that's a little different than let's say post 9 11 when of course the united states saw a coalition but
00:46:25.980
it was going to and it did take action now on what did the idf do which again is unique to actually and
00:46:35.420
novel in preventing we call it civilian harm mitigation so everything you do to
00:46:40.940
to not have civilians hurt and the biggest thing that really the only thing that has been
00:46:48.140
very effective in wars in modern history or even world war ii is if the conditions allow
00:46:55.100
wait and evacuate the cities of the civilians so this is a very like the biggest thing you can do so
00:47:02.380
israel waited after october 7th one it had to mobilize but then it is still waited three more weeks
00:47:09.020
and sent notice especially the northern gaza where the the greatest meat of these 40 000 hamas members
00:47:16.700
organized in 30 different battalions the greatest really population of them were in northern gaza so
00:47:21.980
it evacuated the entire northern gaza and they got criticized for doing that and telling this the
00:47:27.660
civilians to please leave these combat areas and they evacuated 850 000 of the million population in
00:47:34.780
northern gaza and they were criticized for that but it was it was the standard and how you do that
00:47:39.340
through the dropping of flyers was pretty straightforward of course israel because they
00:47:44.060
have the capability and they've developed what nobody else in war does started also using phone calls
00:47:50.300
text messages pre-recorded voice messages to help with those evacuations then they deployed drones with
00:47:56.860
speakers and they deployed speakers um dropped out of pair you know from the sky on parachutes to help
00:48:03.340
evacuate with a very high level of fidelity so that way when you enter the environment you there's less
00:48:08.540
civilians caught in the middle of it so they waited and i heard reports that hamas tried to prevent
00:48:14.460
people from evacuating to make their human shield and human sacrifice strategy more effectively are those
00:48:22.140
reports credible 100 i mean and again we have to believe those reports as much as we believe the
00:48:26.860
other reports of of course the idf told the civilians what road to use and where to go and hamas targeted
00:48:35.580
them or sent them messages to the cars preventing the civilians from leaving and and most of that comes
00:48:41.820
from the civilians in the environment where the information comes and as when you say hamas targeted
00:48:46.540
those yes points of egress do you mean like hamas snipers shot people on those roads correct and
00:48:52.540
and bombed mortared those roads and this is the thing where people will say the other report is that
00:48:59.500
israel targeted the exact areas in which they told the civilians to go which is a you know usually
00:49:06.380
misinformation as a kernel of truth where like hamas would set up a rocket firing position next to a
00:49:11.740
humanitarian zone right and then launch rockets so israel would respond to that and then the world
00:49:16.300
would only pick up on israel is targeting the humanitarian areas they told civilians to go
00:49:21.180
to get out of the combat area yeah really the the only you know that's a safer area but hamas again
00:49:27.260
using the human shield has wanted that narrative and this is also the the difference too to hamas
00:49:33.900
as a combatant as opposed to most other urban combatants even isis right so isis um in the battle
00:49:39.660
of massul used human shields but its purpose wasn't to get as many civilians killed as possible
00:49:45.420
nor was there a way to really hold the people into the area so this again gets to the the
00:49:51.500
uniqueness to this war is the fact that the civilians can't get out into egypt but they were identified
00:49:57.900
this this place in southern gaza that was identified which is now the al-mawasi humanitarian zone it was
00:50:05.020
picked because it was one of the few areas that the idf believed there were less hamas tunnels or hamas
00:50:12.380
military in in in general and initially the the civilians wouldn't go there but yes the hamas and
00:50:19.420
really we can talk about what hamas did during the temporary ceasefire that happened for the hostage
00:50:24.540
exchange which nobody comments on is that during that ceasefire hamas sent hundreds of thousands of
00:50:31.900
civilians into areas and repopulated them with over 300 of the civilians that were there before the war
00:50:39.740
so like in khan yunis hamas increased the population of khan yunis by 300 percent before the idf could
00:50:46.060
start their operation in that area hmm what what do you make of the difference you know albeit a subtle
00:50:53.340
one in how isis or the islamic state used human shields you know versus how hamas is doing it you say
00:51:01.980
that the islamic state wasn't seeking the though they used human shields they weren't seeking to maximize
00:51:08.780
the loss of the loss of civilian life i mean the only way i can interpret that is to imagine that
00:51:14.060
hamas recognizes that in this conflict with israel the role that global opinion plays is you know is
00:51:23.420
a lever that they really have in hand and can easily pull and the way to pull it is to maximize
00:51:29.660
the loss of civilian life because you know they know israel will be blamed for every single
00:51:34.940
body and that the blaming of israel will matter in a way that i can imagine the islamic state did
00:51:42.860
not imagine they had that same kind of leverage with in fighting the u.s and and you know much less
00:51:49.500
you know local iraqi and you know forces in you know being led by the u.s yeah it's a great question
00:51:56.940
as you really have to look at in war the strategy of both sides so this has been trying to have people
00:52:02.860
understand that the hamas military strategy in the war is not to defeat the idea as in in military
00:52:10.940
force it is also not to hold terrain just in those two objectives it's different than isis who was
00:52:17.100
trying to hold the terrain that it had captured to include massul which is the capital of their
00:52:21.980
self-proclaimed caliphate they were really trying to hold the train the hamas strategy in accordance
00:52:28.540
with what they have done has always been about just biding time and why they built this vast
00:52:35.340
tunnel network was to be in the tunnels when idf came i don't think they assumed that israel would
00:52:41.980
maintain the will to continue even this far but it was always about biding time for the world to stop
00:52:48.060
the idf like which has happened in israel's previous wars isis didn't have that strategy as their military
00:52:55.260
strategy or their grand strategy where hamas again again according to them their grand strategy is
00:53:01.820
all this is just in the pursuit of a political objective to israel not existing and for there to
00:53:07.580
be a palestinian state which includes everything that israel is currently sitting on right now
00:53:12.380
that gets into this military aspect where you see a vast difference between isis and hamas both use
00:53:17.900
terror tactics one was a full-out government of this region received billions of dollars to improve
00:53:24.220
the region funneled most of that money into building this terror military that had the intention
00:53:31.980
of just causing the idea to not be successful and that has been where again they say that the
00:53:38.780
civilians should die to achieve that goal and they're fine with the all of them dying in the pursuit
00:53:45.980
of this like you said that there's a fundamental misunderstanding of what hamas and this radical
00:53:52.220
interpretation of islam which leads them to pursue this strategy in real time yeah it's um i don't
00:53:59.900
think i can really recover from my astonishment that people can't see this more easily than they than
00:54:06.940
they have i mean when you look at the protests on college campuses which now have devolved into in
00:54:12.940
many cases explicit support for hamas right they're not even trying to draw a line between the palestinian
00:54:20.300
cause and hamas right there's just needless to say there's no concern for a return of hostages and
00:54:26.540
all these calls for a ceasefire but they're just actually so you know they're just nakedly supporting
00:54:31.660
hamas and yet what should be obvious to everyone is that there's nobody who cares less about saving the
00:54:39.660
lives of palestinian non-combatants than hamas right i mean this is when you're looking to see who is
00:54:47.100
the the most callous about the lives of palestinian children it is uh sinwar and his colleagues down
00:54:54.940
there underground and i just find it so remarkable that people have you know either lost sight of that
00:55:01.260
or have never seen it and that we're seeing it is somehow doesn't matter in how they're interpreting
00:55:06.860
the situation yeah i mean this is the uniqueness i agree with you it's it's it's shocking and concerning
00:55:13.740
where our world's best academic institutions are creating the dumbest students who can't
00:55:19.740
critically think or get access to their own information this has been the you're basically
00:55:24.300
the survey-based analysis of the protesters like do you know which river in the sea means do you know
00:55:30.620
who hamas is what do you know what happened on october 7th it's it's just shocking but i will give
00:55:37.180
you have to analyze it almost empirically on how hamas has been able to tap into all these human
00:55:44.700
storytelling techniques of the you know the the weak versus the powerful the oppressed versus the
00:55:50.380
oppressor and the idea that there is just an alternative if you just stop you know just cease
00:55:56.300
fire now everything will be better if we just cease fire and this has been my position from the beginning
00:56:01.820
as a student of war is that if hamas was allowed to survive the war period as in hamas not the ideal
00:56:09.340
which again i think the world to include military analysts have just every day since october 7th tried
00:56:16.060
to compare this to a counter-insurgency counter-terrorism campaign which we just are comfortable with over the
00:56:22.700
last 30 years is what we know rather than a conventional war mindset of this is a political body
00:56:30.060
with a military holding terrain with political objectives but the fact that the world thinks
00:56:37.100
that you know if you just stop fighting just stop the war right like you said they woke up to what
00:56:41.580
war looks like and that it's intolerable war is hell it is death and destruction but one they want
00:56:48.140
to fail or recognize what the idea have done to limit and restrict themselves and and to prevent
00:56:54.540
civilian harm but they also think that the world will be a better place if the war just stops
00:56:58.460
that if hamas who they are today the hamas that was october 7th in my interpretation if they survive
00:57:06.780
the war they have achieved a massive victory in the history of war they struck israel and as they say
00:57:15.260
as iran says israel and then through israel the united states if they survive that they become
00:57:22.220
these giant legends i mean they'll make statues out of them they'll have there'll be celebration days
00:57:28.380
in iran for hamas leadership who pulled off october 7th and survived it and that we will see a much
00:57:33.980
more violent middle east and world if they survive yeah i've i fully agree with that premonition i just
00:57:41.820
think it's the only answer to the triumphalism of jihadism is to defeat it right there's no it has to be a
00:57:51.820
stark defeat and so i guess my next question for you is how likely is that i mean i guess before you
00:58:00.060
answer that you can perhaps tell us what the idf has actually accomplished thus far in gaza and and
00:58:07.820
now as i said we're we're waiting to see if they're going to go into rafa and i think we both think they
00:58:15.020
should but what has the idf done what is left to do and how likely is it that they can destroy hamas
00:58:23.820
and what and what does that what does destroying hamas actually mean does it mean killing every last
00:58:29.660
member of hamas does it mean just killing the the leadership or you know bringing that otherwise
00:58:34.700
bringing them to justice and then we should talk about what conceivable aftermath there might be if they
00:58:41.020
do what can be done here so what have they done what can be done and uh what does it look like
00:58:47.420
afterwards sure so what they have done and especially keeping in mind what the objectives
00:58:52.940
were you know return to hostages destroy hamas as a military organization with the ability to
00:58:58.140
harm israel and secure israel's borders so if you if we compare to has israel been successful thus
00:59:04.940
far right i can't tell you who's going to achieve ultimate victory in the war yet thus far israel has
00:59:12.380
historically cleared dense urban train at a pace and with a despite the numbers low collateral damage
00:59:21.020
low civilian casualty count they of the 30 battalions 24 of those being light infantry battalions of hamas
00:59:28.620
they have destroyed 20 of the 24 active battalions they have cleared 75 of gaza as in broken apart
00:59:39.340
those functioning military organizations um they have identified the weapons capability right because
00:59:45.020
the rockets are a big part of hamas's military capability that they had immense to include the
00:59:50.460
manufacturing capability so these deep buried weapons manufacturing as in rocket production plants
00:59:56.540
underground that israel has found it has destroyed much of hamas's terror tunnel networks it has
01:00:04.540
returned half the hostages home through military pressure which led to negotiations and it has now
01:00:11.500
created a situation in which there is only four battalions the hamas leadership and the remaining at
01:00:17.180
the time we're talking you know 133 israeli hostages left to fulfill the objectives of israel so that's what
01:00:25.180
they've done so far now the question of destroy hamas that gets everybody going right actually let me
01:00:30.780
just add one uh footnote to what you just said so so obviously we started this conversation talking
01:00:35.820
about how unreliable all the numbers are and now you just kind of went through confidently detailing
01:00:42.940
the numbers in some basic sense and giving a proportion of hamas fighters versus uh non-combatants but
01:00:50.300
again what you're doing here is basically taking hamas's numbers of dead at face value which we can't
01:00:55.500
really do but you know one can imagine it's a something like a worst case scenario number like
01:01:01.260
at the moment 33 000 dead and we're taking idf's claim to have killed something like 13 000 combatants
01:01:09.980
and just using those numbers as as the framework for the proportion right right and this is really gets
01:01:17.420
a bigger question on that we're in a world in which nobody trusts anybody right so they're not
01:01:22.380
going to trust anything israel says the united states says united kingdom says but they'll trust hamas says
01:01:28.300
which is unique but let's say i trust everybody's numbers that's where i get to right and everybody's
01:01:33.580
statements to include hamas's i'm taking all the information available and and making these statements
01:01:39.980
based on what we know like the 33 000 are we confident that the that hamas had 40 000
01:01:48.620
fighters in the first place i mean are those hamas numbers are those idf numbers or that
01:01:53.420
both sides agree on the number of hamas fighters yeah that's a great question no it's it's a combination
01:01:58.460
of both hamas leadership both the political wing in qatar and the military wing in in gaza and the idf and
01:02:06.220
u.s and other intelligence agencies estimates based on a collection right what we call all source analysis
01:02:13.260
a collection of both what hamas says what the idea says what we can gain and we have to achieve some
01:02:19.020
type of okay we will agree that this is the number right so when you say they have uh remind me the
01:02:26.780
proportion of hamas battalions that have been destroyed or or fatally compromised is is what so 20 of the
01:02:35.580
24 basically infantry kind of terrain holding battalions before the war there was an estimate
01:02:41.740
of 30 battalions which includes like the people who shoot the rockets the headquarters everything
01:02:47.420
so of the hamas military 20 battalions of their 24 battalions that they had on october 7th have been
01:02:54.700
destroyed and by destroyed it means broken apart so they're no longer functioning as a military unit
01:03:00.780
able to do their their assigned mission whether it's defend or attack and how do we know is it in
01:03:07.020
terms of the damage to the tunnels i mean what what are you picturing or what do you what are you aware of
01:03:13.180
being true there where i mean it's 400 miles of tunnels it's just it's just staggering and i when i
01:03:20.060
say that number or hear it i'm i can't shake the feeling of of incredulity right i just it just seems
01:03:26.700
impossible but accepting that something like that is true israel could not have destroyed no matter how
01:03:33.900
many 2 000 pound bombs they dropped much of that network maybe they took out crucial nodes in that
01:03:40.220
network what what do you imagine has happened and what is the result i mean are we now talking about
01:03:46.620
hamas fighters and israeli hostages trapped inside tunnels and you know dying of starvation or what i mean
01:03:54.300
what is what is the reality of of that destruction yeah it's really hard to get a true estimate like
01:04:01.020
nobody's given the number of sheer number you know miles of tunnels that have been discovered and
01:04:06.620
destroyed but given the way urban terrain is cleared the reporting of over a thousand shafts identified the
01:04:16.060
number of tunnels in which the idea have controlled destroyed as in using explosives to destroy i mean i was in
01:04:23.500
one in december along the border of israel and gaza that was two and a half miles long it was an
01:04:29.660
invasion tunnel if you were just to take up the number of ones that they have publicly announced
01:04:35.340
and shown the world it's still many many miles but it is a great question and i've gotten this
01:04:42.300
question as somebody who studies underground warfare too it's like when is will they ever be able to
01:04:46.860
destroy all the tunnels absolutely not and if you get to the realization of like how is it possible to
01:04:52.540
have hundreds of miles of tunnels underneath a space that is only you know gaza strip is 25 miles
01:04:59.100
long at the widest part seven miles wide and if that is the really the uniqueness to what hamas has
01:05:05.740
been digging over 15 years so many different levels of tunnels and the idea have shown the world much of
01:05:13.100
that and shown how they both identified like here's a two mile here's a three mile tunnel here here we are
01:05:20.780
destroying it um it's really hard to get that estimate but in the clearing of this is why you
01:05:27.260
couldn't have done it with just bombing right you could not have bombed your way to this nor could you
01:05:32.380
it's going to be hard do it quickly identify every tunnel and you have to prioritize what is a
01:05:38.380
you know a certain level of a tunnel and you won't ever be able to destroy them all because
01:05:43.900
you you're not going to find them all but you you get to a certain level of fidelity and what they
01:05:49.020
have discovered is more than anybody thought that was ever there are idf soldiers going down into the
01:05:55.420
tunnels and engaging hamas fighters in shooting battles underground or are they simply finding shafts and
01:06:06.380
dropping explosives into them and and considering that part of the tunnel destroyed when it when
01:06:12.300
it all collapses i mean what are they sending robots down there or are they doing all of those things
01:06:17.020
what what is underground warfare like in this case yeah all above so absolutely like it started like you
01:06:25.420
we were talking about you know with identifying known key bunkers and underground spaces and and
01:06:32.060
hitting those with with aerial munitions moving forward and as the idf moved forward like in
01:06:37.260
northern gaza if they found a tunnel shaft they would stop bring up the special to israel um the
01:06:43.740
unique forces trained only for underground warfare you know they have underground dogs or dogs made for
01:06:51.580
tunnel warfare and they actually lost over 30 of a very large military working dog because once you
01:06:58.220
would find a tunnel then you bring up these special units there were firefights that happened in
01:07:03.900
tunnels that they're they're very few though because once the tunnel has been found hamas has booby
01:07:10.380
trapped it and moved on or to another tunnel and there was a uniqueness to the approach in northern
01:07:15.820
gaza versus by time i visited in december or no in february in con units there was a different approach
01:07:22.060
at one point the idf were flooding the tunnels with both sea water and fresh water to flush the in the
01:07:28.460
hamas out and to clear the explosives everything has been tried but in by time i get to con units really
01:07:36.140
which is this is a hamas space and hamas is using the tunnels by time i visit the idea in you know just
01:07:43.340
a month and a half ago they were entering the tunnels before hamas knew they were in the tunnels and using
01:07:49.420
basically taking control the tunnels and maneuvering on hamas at the same time they were moving above
01:07:56.140
ground but this is the challenge of underground warfare you have to develop new types of equipment
01:08:01.020
yes they used the robots the drones that could work underground um yes they destroyed and really
01:08:07.100
there's only a few ways you can truly destroy a tunnel like the flooding that did not work to destroy
01:08:12.460
a tunnel because the tunnels are made of concrete they have uh some of them have drainage in them
01:08:17.740
you know it's just it's just not a a solid tube so the water is not going to stay in there where
01:08:23.340
explosive force is really the only tried and true way to destroy a tunnel and you have to you string a
01:08:29.980
tunnel you'll string mines together along the full width of a tunnel which if you imagine is two miles
01:08:35.820
long it takes a lot of explosives and how are they doing any of this while keeping the lives of the
01:08:44.540
hostages in mind what sort of intelligence do you think they have about the the location of the
01:08:50.300
hostages when they're simply blowing up a tunnel how can they be confident they're not killing
01:08:56.380
hostages or burying them alive yeah i mean is this information you have and and if so what do you
01:09:02.140
know about the i mean it seems to me that the existence of the hostages as is intended complicates
01:09:09.180
this picture immensely i mean yes it complicates the prosecution of the war immensely in in all kinds
01:09:15.660
of ways as you pointed out it sets the clock ticking in a way that wouldn't otherwise be true
01:09:22.300
and the idea that you can just sort of bide your time and decide you know what you know how you want
01:09:28.300
to respond over the course of weeks and months and years that goes out completely out the window once
01:09:33.260
you've got hundreds of people now being held hostage and and mistreated underground but it
01:09:39.500
also it just it's very hard to imagine how they can be confidently destroying tunnels with hamas in
01:09:45.180
them knowing that they're the hostages are somewhere underground right no it's it's a great topic from
01:09:51.740
really the highest strategic level down to that tactical level where you're not going to especially
01:09:56.860
destroy a tunnel without first investigating what's in the tunnel um so most of the destruction outside of
01:10:03.100
the aerial bombardments which are intelligence driven like they know what they're targeting a
01:10:07.820
military target underground and they have some form of human intelligence signals intelligence some
01:10:13.260
other aspect to know whether or not a hostage is present with the enemy combatant that they're
01:10:18.940
striking but once you get you know close and you're sending those drones to dogs everything in
01:10:23.900
the tunnel the destroying that i was talking about is really after you've exploited what's in the
01:10:29.740
tunnel because of that immense risk that i agree with you complicates every aspect of the war is the
01:10:35.580
fact that you know your enemies underground but there is also the possibility of your your
01:10:41.340
citizens you're the hostages in there which leads to all the even the the highest level um
01:10:47.660
which i argued in a wall street journal article that the ideal that there is an alternative to
01:10:51.740
the way that israel has done it right which does like you said would be just to wait a few years
01:10:56.780
years use intelligence to find the hostages and do raids which is really a fallacy it's never
01:11:04.620
happened where you have an enemy environment like that because a raid relies on lots of intelligence
01:11:10.700
and immense surprise and some type of like a permissive because you've surprised whether it was the
01:11:17.100
osama bin laden raid into pakistan pakistan didn't know we were coming for him they didn't
01:11:22.700
they said they didn't know he was there but to imagine that you were going to build enough
01:11:26.620
intelligence to one day just to do a bunch of raids into gaza a hostile environment by definition who
01:11:33.580
knows you're coming and that you could eventually achieve your goal of bringing the hostages home
01:11:38.620
a different way is not true it's just never it's not historically backed up but that has led to this
01:11:44.540
idea of like you said just it just gonna take you a lot of time just just leave them in captivity
01:11:49.820
let hamas survive for now and we'll figure out a different way it's just not backed up by history
01:11:55.100
yeah especially what's it to return to again the probably the least comfortable topic here
01:12:01.980
the imaginary line between the public sentiment of the palestinians and hamas i mean just you're
01:12:08.700
talking about a population that if it's not entirely supportive of the project of keeping these hostages
01:12:14.140
enough people are supportive of it that the problem is shrouded by a hostile population that is is seems
01:12:24.380
happy to collaborate with hamas's project of keeping the hostages for as long as they want to keep them
01:12:31.180
yeah but i think this again i definitely a hundred percent that factors into what could be done about
01:12:37.500
the situation but in war i'm a very i i'm in such a proponent for the law of words people just don't
01:12:44.140
understand because it's meant to put bounds on the brutality of war and that there is such thing as an
01:12:50.620
you know innocent civilian or non-combatant but people don't understand what it takes for that person that
01:12:56.540
to partake in the hostilities and make themselves a combatant you don't have to be carrying a weapon you
01:13:04.060
could be reporting on the enemy that's coming you could be doing building things there's so many
01:13:09.020
other aspects of being a combatant versus a non-combatant where yes in this world of hamas where
01:13:15.660
they wear civilians use human shields use the hospitals use everything they can to make israel look bad
01:13:23.420
it's it is the greatest challenge for any soldier let alone an israeli soldier to operate within these
01:13:31.820
all these different challenges actually let's linger on that point for a second because this is
01:13:36.860
this might help people interpret some video which is really any way you look at it it is shocking video
01:13:44.460
that i've seen i think at one point i saw joe rogan on his podcast show the video and respond to it as
01:13:52.620
really any untutored person would as just he believes he's seen clear evidence of idf war crimes and
01:14:01.580
and the video is just men who do not appear to be armed being bombed right i mean and this for all
01:14:08.780
i know this could be video from some other theater of combat i mean it could have been drone a drone
01:14:13.580
attack on by us but on on men in iraq i don't you know i don't know actually the provenance of the
01:14:19.500
video but assuming this was whether these were palestinian men you know walking among amid rubble
01:14:26.860
being killed and they're not in the process of firing rpgs or or rockets uh and they didn't
01:14:33.660
even appear to be armed how is it possible that a strike like that could have been justified on its
01:14:40.620
face it looks impossible to justify right really especially with somebody who's never seen you know
01:14:46.460
doesn't have any comprehension of the way the law of war works war works in general and i watched
01:14:52.220
joe interpret that video and he bet he and he and just by the words he was saying i knew that
01:14:59.660
he didn't have a framework in which to understand what the world was watching in that 20 second clip
01:15:05.180
right he said unarmed kids he actually said kids which is getting to this definition of what is a
01:15:10.940
you know what is a a kid or or an adult where that line is drawn in that combat situation right which
01:15:18.380
everybody acknowledged it's a combat zone you know that 30 second clip doesn't give me any ability to
01:15:24.460
understand what was going on other than there is somebody who is struck with a bomb no idea on what
01:15:29.420
that person was doing before that video started did they come out of a tunnel did they do something
01:15:34.860
before it and then they were did the idf already know who those individuals were again you can be a
01:15:42.300
a member of hamas like a designated member and that's that makes you a combatant it has nothing to
01:15:50.220
do with if you're carrying a weapon at the moment or if you're you're shooting at the idf at the moment
01:15:56.300
you're a member of the help the enemy force there's so much to that video that is unknown especially
01:16:01.820
like what were they doing before where did they come from what were their who were they what were
01:16:06.540
their intentions that clearly yes the idf meant to hit them so they have to let's say if you did an
01:16:14.060
investigation say this is again where people look at the the end results but the idf under question
01:16:21.100
would have to show like okay how did you know that was a military target because clearly they use
01:16:27.420
precision guided ammunition to strike just those four individuals which again gets to the kind of the
01:16:32.860
false negative that you would have to prove and of course they're targeting civilians right that's
01:16:37.180
what they do like no you have to see what the war the law of war the war crime accusation requires
01:16:44.220
you to know what they were doing we want to interpret we see the explosion like clearly they were
01:16:50.460
targeting those unarmed civilian kids like there's so much wrong with that we don't know so it's a crucial
01:16:57.180
detail that you just you don't know what they were doing moments or minutes before i mean perhaps the
01:17:03.660
full video is showing people who just planted an ied or did something that was obviously you know the
01:17:10.700
behavior of combatants and now they're walking away and then they get targeted or who they were like
01:17:18.860
literally the fact that joe says look clearly they're not carrying any weapons like okay that's a data
01:17:24.060
point but that doesn't mean that you're not an enemy in in in this combat area i mean the power
01:17:30.140
of facial recognition and all these other aspects you have to know what the idf knew at the time they
01:17:35.580
took that strike and clearly they they targeted those individuals that's a fact because they did it very
01:17:41.500
precisely yeah well i mean again that for those who haven't seen the footage this is um the footage
01:17:47.980
was not at night right so it's not it doesn't suffer from the same and there were no these people
01:17:52.700
weren't hidden inside of cars right so it's not analogous to the world central kitchen
01:17:59.180
false id problem where they were clearly striking people they were intending to strike they just were
01:18:04.060
the wrong people in the world kitchen yeah yeah yeah well so you've spoken about what the idf has
01:18:10.220
already done and you you seem to believe that hamas really does have to be defeated at the end of this
01:18:17.100
what is reasonable to hope for there i assume this means that the the idf by definition has to go into
01:18:24.700
rafa what what would destroying hamas look like and what would the aftermath look like i mean what what
01:18:32.620
you know if if they have destroyed hamas perhaps not down to the last man but you know rendered the whole
01:18:38.780
hamas project obviously a failure and now gaza is this hellscape that has no one to rule it except
01:18:49.180
whatever lunatics can rise up out of the ashes and be you know nearly as extreme and irresistible as
01:18:56.700
hamas it's not going to be a stable uh victory and certainly world opinion will continue to cut against
01:19:03.260
israel there what what does destroying hamas look like in the best case and how can they conceivably
01:19:10.460
manage the aftermath yeah it's a great question and it really gets to this i guess this misinterpretation
01:19:16.540
of what does them what does it mean to destroy hamas where people say it's not possible right because
01:19:21.340
they mix this you know destroy the idea of hamas versus the destroy what hamas was on october 6th
01:19:27.500
and its military capabilities and all of its resources that it it created and and immersed
01:19:32.700
and smuggled in and it was sent in everything like that one thing is that what the best case scenario is
01:19:41.020
and i don't agree although it is the most likely scenario that it it requires a full ground invasion
01:19:47.980
into southern gaza right rafa city rafa refugee camp the other areas because hamas could surrender
01:19:53.660
tomorrow hamas could surrender to include disarm agreement to disarm themselves and surrender
01:20:00.220
anybody who partook on october 7th and committed those heinous crimes they could give all the
01:20:05.980
hostages back and that would lead to a much lower intensity operation that would still in my opinion be
01:20:14.060
required because in order to destroy hamas what it was on october 7th you have to search for its
01:20:20.460
military capability its remaining rocket supply its remaining smuggling tunnels its remaining
01:20:27.980
weapons manufacturing capability you would still have to search southern gaza in my opinion to achieve
01:20:33.420
the goal of destroying hamas as both the ruling power because you don't fight an insurgency against
01:20:42.380
the ruling power you fight an insurgency for a the people or a government against an insurgency
01:20:48.940
but you you have to remove hamas from power you have to remove their military capability so best
01:20:54.140
case scenario is that the remaining four battalions are destroyed as functioning units able to do their
01:21:00.620
mission the hamas military leadership remaining in gaza is killed or captured all the hostages are returned
01:21:08.220
home then like you said is absolutely the next phase that will determine whether the world views it as
01:21:16.940
your success or not because the challenge of gaza is the that next phase that d the post-conflict
01:21:27.820
phase of rebuilding re-establishing a different framework right this is gets to the ideal which
01:21:34.060
i know will be a big challenge because it hasn't been there yet is a viable partner who actually has the
01:21:40.700
the pursuit of a better life for the people of gaza as their number one priority and not the destruction
01:21:47.500
of israel as their number one priority this has been the history of the israel-palestine conflict
01:21:53.420
right is having a viable partner who will acknowledge israel should exist to disavow terrorism and and pursue
01:22:01.900
a a path to include by action of really caring for the people so once hamas is destroyed which in my
01:22:09.500
opinion has to be done then israel has to help in creating the next governance the power structures
01:22:16.860
the security framework but also and i think they will ensure that whatever comes next in in self
01:22:24.860
determination isn't able to gain that much military capability for the sole purpose of doing october 7th or
01:22:33.580
launching rockets as their primary goal yeah which suggests that you know in the even in an ideal
01:22:41.180
world a two-state solution can't really be two states in any normal sense we're not talking about a
01:22:47.340
state that has its own army and etc because we would have a have to have a very different set of facts on
01:22:54.940
the ground for israel to imagine they can live next to a a palestinian state after october 7th right which
01:23:02.940
this has been the you know the the great lie is the ideal that israel has been the only hurdle to a
01:23:08.060
two-state solution with palestinians and israelis living side by side in harmony the great lie is that
01:23:14.540
the greatest greatest hurdle to that was israel versus organizations whether it's the pa palestine
01:23:20.700
authority hamas whatever it is whose sole you know ideal it's construction everything it does is actually to
01:23:28.860
attack israel rather than pursue a better life within the it's almost like the diplomatic laziness
01:23:35.260
just two-state solution has been especially the u.s administration's goal right but they can't nobody
01:23:41.020
can articulate what that actually is in reality in real terms and and it has been which is now leading
01:23:48.620
them the uninformed of the world on that's the solution to the violence two-state solution which october
01:23:55.740
7th can't become hamas's independence day right it can't become palestinian independence day they
01:24:02.540
did october 7th and then they should get you know all the things in return just to make the violence
01:24:07.260
stop that would just lead to a much more violent world as well but it's it's really like diplomatic
01:24:12.300
laziness to think that that's the solution like without any recognizing the decades of administrations
01:24:19.660
who have pursued that objective and failed yeah i mean the reasons for that failure as you point out
01:24:25.900
have have almost never been acknowledged but it's it is another one of these obvious and and absolute
01:24:31.420
asymmetries that strangely everyone seems to ignore which is that israel has wanted a two-state solution
01:24:39.740
i mean not everyone in israel but but a majority of israelis certainly have wanted a two-state solution
01:24:44.940
they have wanted to live in peace with a palestinian neighbor that would live in peace with
01:24:49.340
them but that has not been reciprocated on the other side there has been a pervasive commitment to
01:24:56.300
not the palestinians getting the state they want alongside of israel but rather for the annihilation of
01:25:04.700
israel the existence of israel has been the thing that has always been put in question on the palestinian
01:25:10.060
side and that's just not a symmetrical situation so you you would need a palestinian regime and
01:25:16.380
a palestinian population that actually wanted to live in peace alongside israel for there to be
01:25:21.500
anything like a basis for a two-state solution right and this is i mean to get back to the now
01:25:27.980
what is what is what comes after hamas i don't know and i don't think israel knows but it knows
01:25:34.700
like i can talk uncertainties versus the uncertainty that hamas has to be destroyed for the peace of
01:25:41.340
the middle east and the peace of israel and the palestinian people like that's step one what comes
01:25:46.140
day after the day after really matters and how the war will be viewed so israel has a lot of decisions
01:25:53.500
but so do the people of gaza but don't you see the the untenability of it being a prolonged israeli
01:26:02.620
occupation of gaza i mean the picture of the aftermath that you're envisioning does that
01:26:07.660
include a an internationalization of the whole project where you bring in some of the arab states
01:26:13.980
to figure out how to pacify and rebuild gaza or are you actually picturing a you know many years of
01:26:21.900
israel essentially being the government in gaza or backstopping the the whatever the palestinian
01:26:29.260
government is yeah that's a great question so i don't envision that at all because not because
01:26:33.740
of my own thought because israel says they don't want that that was tried and then they left in 2005
01:26:39.100
and and hamas was elected in 2008 and said that's not what we want despite the accusations of occupation
01:26:45.660
since then i mean the blockade and apartheid and all these misinformed opinions but the the other
01:26:53.660
proposition you provided with like you know an arab nation all these other actors is also not present
01:27:00.060
right this is the egypt wants nothing to do with the people of gaza they're a part of this if there was
01:27:06.620
a multinational arab nation coalition who could assist and of course there'll be rebuilding but you
01:27:14.060
know for israel not to have a a part of that as in for another terrorist regime to because the united
01:27:22.140
states wanted there to be an election in gaza and hamas was elected both in gaza and the west bank and
01:27:29.980
the palestinian authority just said no we don't do that as a legitimate election that whatever comes
01:27:34.700
next you i can't israel says they don't want occupation but they will of course be a part of
01:27:40.780
ensuring that another hamas which they're having to do in real time and they and they do own that
01:27:46.620
right they they own some of that to prevent another hamas not just to destroy and leave it in chaos
01:27:53.900
absolutely i agree with that and that's the the history of such operations as well and i agree with
01:27:59.900
you that in order for this to work there has to be multiple other nations involved on identifying who is
01:28:05.900
the other viable partner in gaza how to rebuild rebuild all the structures not just the buildings
01:28:12.540
so that they're on a path to a better life than what hamas was giving them i know we're getting to
01:28:18.220
the end of our allotted time here but i just want to ask you the um not so simple question of what do
01:28:24.060
you think israel should do must do will do about hezbollah to the north yeah that's a great question i
01:28:33.980
wish more people would ask it and recognize and and tell the facts about how hezbollah and in my last
01:28:39.260
trip back in february i went up to northern israel to the blue line i walked the line of where hezbollah
01:28:44.700
is attacking since october 8th it entered the war a second front was there and hezbollah has been
01:28:50.140
attacking since october 8th with not just rockets but taking out all the security posts and cameras
01:28:56.780
and and sending people across the blue line and violating the u.n security council i don't you know
01:29:03.340
they say and again if you if you want to listen to them say the reason they did that was because of the
01:29:07.820
war in gaza which is interesting since they started on october 8th and israel hadn't even declared and
01:29:14.060
conducted operations in gaza yet but the situation i can say with certainty can't continue there's
01:29:20.300
80 000 people just in northern israel who haven't been home in the last six months who are living in
01:29:25.740
hotels when i go there they're in the hotels that i stay at because of the daily threat of hezbollah and
01:29:31.740
hezbollah is a much larger problem and israel had and other nations have been pursuing a political
01:29:37.740
solution because it all doesn't have to turn into war for hezbollah to back up to the u.n security
01:29:45.020
council agreed framework and stop attacking israel but if they're not willing i don't see how israel
01:29:52.460
doesn't have to also use force to secure its northern border and allow its citizens which 80 000 like
01:30:00.220
the number almost surpasses people's ability to imagine what that looks like on the ground with
01:30:05.500
all these cities evacuated 80 000 who can't go home because hezbollah attacks every day i know hezbollah
01:30:13.500
is a larger problem in that they're a larger force a better trained force a better armed force they have
01:30:19.820
more rockets which is to say it's a in the end it's probably a more important problem to solve but i'm
01:30:25.820
wondering is it is it as large a problem with respect to the prospect of civilian casualties
01:30:32.460
if they decided to launch a war into lebanon i mean if the idf woke up tomorrow and and was fully
01:30:39.820
committed to destroying hezbollah as quickly as possible uh with all of its all the applicable
01:30:46.460
force available to it would they be by definition creating as much collateral damage as they have in
01:30:53.260
gaza or are things different up in the north and are the the combatants much easier to target without
01:30:59.980
the same kind of loss of civilian life right yeah it's a great question of course it's less density
01:31:07.260
there are still urban areas in southern lebanon that would require their restraint on the use of force
01:31:13.820
but there is a lot more military real because hezbollah didn't develop the same strategy as hamas of
01:31:20.220
of course it went underground and it's actually called the land of tunnels in southern lebanon of
01:31:24.700
course that's what militaries do to protect their systems and there's hundreds of miles in southern
01:31:30.220
lebanon but unlike hamas hezbollah didn't build them solely underneath civilians to get civilians killed
01:31:37.740
yes it would be a much different situation although the scale is 10 times right well hundreds of
01:31:43.100
thousands of hezbollah fighters with you know estimates of tens of if not hundreds of thousands of rockets but
01:31:50.220
they are also much more targetable from a military stance without the civilian harm because they're
01:31:56.860
but they're in mountainous terrain they're more protected it would still be a very big challenge for
01:32:03.340
the idea to defeat hezbollah but you you get to this question which again people won't recognize that
01:32:10.940
october 7th was an existential threat to israel not just to southern israel they wanted to get to
01:32:16.780
jerusalem hezbollah poses an existential threat to israel so it has to respond hopefully not with
01:32:24.060
military force but if that if you have to then you have to and it would take an immense war to defeat
01:32:30.700
hezbollah let alone just push them back to their no longer threatening israel i hesitate to pull the
01:32:37.660
question of iran in here because i i know we're short on time but do you have a uh an encapsulated
01:32:43.660
version of what you think can and should and will be done with respect to iran either by israel alone
01:32:50.300
or by some coalition of forces yeah i mean i do and i can i can i think i can do it shortly that of course
01:32:56.460
iran is the head of all these snakes first we have to acknowledge that hezbollah hamas and the houthis
01:33:01.980
are all iranian backed organizations who are trained funded finance and directed by iran themselves so
01:33:09.740
hezbollah says it like can we can we at least believe these groups when they say that they act
01:33:17.020
in accordance with iran's direction iran is the big disruptor of the middle east where you have some
01:33:23.340
people believe october 7th came about because israel was close to a bilateral relationship with saudi arabia
01:33:29.980
like it has with jordan egypt and other arab nations and that was too much of a threat to
01:33:34.620
iran who wants it has its ideals of the middle east and has pursued this proxy war using its proxies to
01:33:41.740
attack israel that's absolutely and what it did on april 14th when it attacked israel with 300 drones
01:33:48.540
cruise missiles and ballistic missiles people just kind of it was a part of the news but it wasn't
01:33:53.660
like that's huge that's historic like that israel as a nation was attacked by iran directly not through
01:34:02.300
its multi-year decades long use of proxies to attack israel but it it directly attacked and
01:34:08.860
it's kind of like it was in the news everybody wants to de-escalate so it kind of uh we'll just
01:34:13.180
keep moving forward the world has to deal with iran not israel the united states has to change its
01:34:18.940
position with iran and what what would that change look like or what should it look like i mean do you
01:34:24.460
think i'm sort of mystified as to why even prior to the attack on israel or just with the the houthi
01:34:30.860
attack on shipping why we had didn't decide to just exact some price directly on iran at that point
01:34:39.180
right like just destroying their ports or their ability to export oil it seems like the deterrence
01:34:47.260
has completely failed with respect to iran in fact it's reversed iran has effectively deterred
01:34:54.220
the united states up until this moment strangely the united states seems more averse to and worried
01:35:02.060
about and just frankly scared of a war with iran than iran does 100 no i think it's a great a great
01:35:09.500
assessment that what we've seen in the last six months has been a failure of deterrence it was a
01:35:14.860
failure of israel to deter hamas it was a failure to deter iran it's a failure of u.s foreign policy
01:35:22.380
to deter iran from pursuing nuclear weapons to using its proxy forces to attack countries in the middle
01:35:30.140
east 100 but i do understand because i understand the significance of state-on-state warfare where why
01:35:37.580
can't the u.s just strike iran well there are reasons why because that would open a whole pandora's
01:35:42.460
box of second and third order consequences but this is what you have the lunacy of iran attacking
01:35:48.940
israel and everybody's like yeah you know just let it go just let go well is the the letting it go
01:35:54.060
moment is it to what degree did iran engineer a flamboyant but nonetheless benign attack on israel
01:36:07.100
by telegraphing what they were going to do allow it making it as easy as possible for
01:36:12.700
the us and the jordanians and and the israelis to nullify everything that was incoming uh how sincere
01:36:20.140
an attack do we think that was and how much of it was just a kind of a face-saving maneuver which was
01:36:26.540
meant to say okay let's let's not have a war after we do this let's settle down yeah no i think it's a
01:36:32.540
great question because it has been the great again interpretation of the facts um the fact that even
01:36:38.620
the united states like we had no warning there was no telegraphing yes because it's really hard to move
01:36:44.860
stuff around in iran without somebody seeing it you have them satellites and everything but there was
01:36:49.900
nothing that was telegraphed and by the intentions of what was shot at israel and yeah so everybody uses
01:36:56.940
the 99 of it all shot down thanks to israel's defensive capabilities and the fact that united
01:37:03.420
states helped and jordan helped and saudi arabia helped and like like what world are we living in
01:37:08.860
where no that was a legitimate attack with full intention to really cause a massive amount of damage
01:37:16.300
and civilian casualties in israel i mean 300 drones isn't a oh i know you'll shoot all this down ballistic
01:37:24.140
and cruise missiles i know you'll get all these you know we all know i'm just trying to save face
01:37:28.300
no no the fact is that they actually had and that was a technique that has been used in like ukraine
01:37:35.180
send a wave of drones to overload their defense then send in cruise and ballistic missiles just
01:37:41.260
because it was all knocked down doesn't mean that we're intention and actions really matter but we're
01:37:47.020
living in a world where in the the result matters like that's that's not the way it works yeah so that's
01:37:53.260
that's that's another interesting asymmetry here the effectiveness of israel's defense israel's
01:37:59.100
defense in this case in concert with their allies helping them the effectiveness is being held against
01:38:05.900
israel as a sign that that any further engagement with iran would be by definition an overreaction
01:38:12.620
because nothing happened you know like they tried to kill you but they didn't succeed so like you're the
01:38:17.420
one who's now hysterical yeah what are you doing responding to this you know it's the same thing that's
01:38:22.540
happened for years with you know israel having invested so much in iron dome and in their bomb
01:38:28.060
shelters that the ineffectuality of hamas's rockets and hezbollah's rockets has delivered the message to
01:38:34.780
the whole world that israel doesn't really have an existential problem because they everyone can just
01:38:39.500
keep going to bomb shelters and and the iron dome seems to work so you know there's really no no factor
01:38:45.420
over there all the while hezbollah and hamas are really trying to kill civilians in israel it's an
01:38:51.660
amazing situation well john it's it's been fantastic to get you on the podcast and to get your expertise
01:38:56.300
here you've cleared up i think a lot of confusion even and it's some of my own confusion frankly on
01:39:02.540
many of these points so um please keep doing what you're doing and as the chaos proceeds i would love
01:39:09.340
to get you back here at some point to bring us up to the minute and help us understand what's been
01:39:13.500
happening well thanks sam and thanks for having me uh a great conversation