#406 — The Legacy of Christianity
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
154.17111
Summary
In this episode, historian Tom Holland joins me to talk about his new book, Dominion, and why he thinks that Christianity is the most enduring legacy of the ancient world. He also talks about the impact of the Crusades and the rise of radical Islam.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Just a note to say that if
00:00:11.640
you're hearing this, you're not currently on our subscriber feed, and we'll only be
00:00:15.580
hearing the first part of this conversation. In order to access full episodes of the Making
00:00:19.840
Sense Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. There you'll also find our
00:00:24.960
scholarship program, where we offer free accounts to anyone who can't afford one. We don't run
00:00:29.340
ads on the podcast, and therefore it's made possible entirely through the support of our
00:00:33.120
subscribers. So if you enjoy what we're doing here, please consider becoming one.
00:00:45.400
I'm here with Tom Holland. Tom, thanks for joining me.
00:00:49.480
I'm a huge fan of your work. I have known about your books for some years, but I recently
00:00:54.680
discovered your podcast, which you do with Dominic Sandbrook, a fellow historian, which
00:00:59.000
is fantastic. The rest is history. I am working my way through Dominion, which is fantastic.
00:01:06.720
And this came out a few years ago, but I'm well into it. And it's also great as an audiobook,
00:01:15.400
Well, Sam, if I could just say also, I'm just in the process of recording it myself.
00:01:22.320
So I've just come back from the recording studio.
00:01:23.440
So don't get the audiobook. Wait for Tom to record it.
00:01:26.300
Yeah. Yeah. That's interesting. So yeah, I mean, I don't know if you'll find that as
00:01:30.200
painful a process as I do, but it's surprisingly hard.
00:01:36.640
I've actually had to rewrite lines that I couldn't get through. I'd inadvertently written
00:01:40.980
tongue twisters for myself. And after 20 takes in front of an ashen-faced producer,
00:01:45.820
I literally have to change the language so that I can neurologically accomplish the task.
00:01:50.700
You've written about ancient Rome, Christianity, as I said, and Dominion, which we'll focus on.
00:01:58.840
But you've also covered the origins of Islam and the problem of jihadism in the West. I discovered
00:02:05.600
as late as last night, the short documentary you did on ISIS, the Islamic State, which was
00:02:13.280
quite something to revisit. It's amazing how the memory of the extremity of that horror has faded for
00:02:19.940
even people who have focused on it at the time. It was just such a ghastly distillation of everything
00:02:26.160
that's wrong with that fanaticism, which we'll talk about. So anyway, there's a ton to cover.
00:02:31.540
And I really want to get your sense as a historian of the echoes of history that we're seeing in the
00:02:39.340
present. I mean, so much of the history that you've covered on your podcast, you have a great
00:02:44.480
series on the French Revolution. I think we're hearing echoes of that in recent years, echoes of
00:02:49.920
the fall of Rome and other concerns. Also, before we started, you told me you have a new translation
00:02:55.320
of Suetonius' Lives of the Caesars coming out in April, which people should look for, which I didn't
00:03:01.300
realize you're a translator. You translated Herodotus back in the day, and I look forward to
00:03:07.580
picking that up. So anyway, that's a long introduction. Tom, welcome to the podcast.
00:03:11.200
Thanks very much for having me. So let's start with the thesis in Dominion,
00:03:16.940
the argument that Christianity is the most enduring legacy of the ancient world, and that
00:03:22.320
many of us who think we were never really indoctrinated in it or by it certainly don't
00:03:29.280
imagine ourselves to be attached to it. An outspoken atheist like myself imagines that
00:03:35.320
his morality was not actually handed to him by Jesus or Paul or medieval Christendom or the Bible
00:03:43.620
thumpers in my own country, with whom I'm even more familiar. You argue that so much of what we
00:03:50.300
take to be natural to us in secular moral terms is really the legacy of Christian ethics. So let's
00:04:00.460
jump in. I don't mean to lead the witness too much, but let's just start with what accounts for
00:04:05.240
the rise and endurance of Christianity on your account.
00:04:08.780
Well, the rise, nothing comes from nothing. So it clearly emerges from a confluence of whole kinds of
00:04:20.900
different cultural streams. The most obvious of those, of course, is the inheritance of Hebrew
00:04:28.520
scripture. Jesus is saturated in that. Paul and the first Christians as well. But there is also
00:04:37.240
the influence of Greece, Greek culture, Greek philosophy. Paul writes in Greek and he invokes
00:04:45.380
Greek philosophical concepts and indeed infuses them into his letters. I think that you can discern
00:04:52.840
more distantly because it is an influence on Hebrew scripture rather than directly on the world of the
00:05:01.180
early church. Persian dualism, the sense that the world and the cosmos is a moral entity, that there are
00:05:10.620
such concepts as good and evil, which the Persians would define as truth and the lie, as light and
00:05:18.800
darkness. And then, of course, there is the context that is provided by the Roman Empire, which is very
00:05:26.520
self-consciously universalist. Virgil, Rome's greatest poet, claims that the Romans have been given
00:05:34.640
empire without limit by the gods. And the physical manifestations of that assumption are the great
00:05:43.700
roads, roads that are starting to be cast like the mesh of a net over the various provinces that the Romans
00:05:51.240
have conquered. The shipping lanes have been largely cleared from pirates. And so, the world has been joined
00:05:57.600
together in a way that it had never previously been. And Christianity emerges in a way that is very conscious of
00:06:07.280
that kind of universal dimension. And Paul in this, I think, is the key figure. A Judean raised with a deep
00:06:16.840
knowledge of the scriptures, but also he has a very, very keen awareness of the vastness of the world.
00:06:25.500
And in a sense, he gives to the non-Judeans in the Roman Empire a chance to share in what have already
00:06:36.580
been discerned by many Gentiles as the kind of the spiritual and scriptural riches of the Judean
00:06:45.320
inheritance. And I think in that context, you can see why Christianity would be as successful as it is,
00:06:55.160
because it is absorbing all kinds of elements that are culturally present in the world of the Roman
00:07:03.060
Mediterranean, and mixing them in a way that proves very appealing to large numbers of people across the
00:07:12.540
Roman Mediterranean, and indeed beyond the Roman Mediterranean into the lands of the Persians as
00:07:18.800
But isn't the appeal still somewhat paradoxical? I mean, this is something that I think you cover in
00:07:25.120
your book, and it's a point that I think Paul made and Nietzsche also made. I mean, I think Paul and
00:07:32.380
Nietzsche could be considered the bookends of Christianity, but both acknowledged how astounding
00:07:39.660
it was that a living God was crucified, and that somehow this abject failure within his lifetime to
00:07:49.020
conquer anything became the symbol that so much of the world found spiritually inspiring, right? I mean,
00:07:57.800
there had been this historical precedent of various kings and other figures being acknowledged to be
00:08:04.500
divine, right? Becoming divine at some point in their lives, or just, you know, claiming to be divine,
00:08:09.920
and yet they're not the center of a 2,000-year-old cult or, you know, worldwide religion.
00:08:16.360
So let's linger for a moment just on the strangeness of the Jesus story.
00:08:22.860
Yeah, it's incredibly strange. And as you say, the strangeness is not the idea that a man can in
00:08:29.420
some way also be divine, because most people in the Roman world take that for granted. And in fact,
00:08:36.140
the fastest growing cult in the 1st century AD is not Christianity, but the cult of another man who
00:08:44.060
was thought to be the son of a god, who proclaimed good news, who claimed to rule over an age of peace,
00:08:53.340
and who, when he died, was believed to have ascended to heaven to sit at the right hand of his father.
00:08:59.320
And this is Caesar Augustus, the man who rules effectively as the first emperor, the son of
00:09:04.800
Julius Caesar, who brings peace to a world that had been ravaged by civil war. And the achievements of
00:09:11.500
Augustus are what raise him to the heavens. The Romans, and indeed many in the provinces, feel that his
00:09:17.800
achievements are of a divine order. The idea that someone who not – it's not just that Jesus was an
00:09:29.620
unimportant provincial from a backwater, but the fact that he had suffered a peculiarly horrible death.
00:09:37.840
Crucifixion was the paradigmatic fate that was visited on slaves, because it was not only agonising,
00:09:46.120
but it was also publicly humiliating. And in a sense, humiliation for the Romans was seen as being
00:09:52.660
almost more terrible than physical pain. And you're right that, in a sense, Paul and Nietzsche do
00:10:01.980
kind of bookend this sense. Because in Paul's letters, again and again, you get a sense of utter shock
00:10:08.800
that this could have happened. Paul's letters are not kind of a cool, measured articulation of doctrine.
00:10:15.960
He is wrestling with a sense of overwhelming astonishment that, in some way, the one God of Israel
00:10:26.800
Israel has been made manifest as someone who suffered this hideous death. And it kind of blows his mind,
00:10:32.980
and he's endlessly trying to make sense of it. I think what then happens over the course of the Christian
00:10:39.620
centuries that follow is that it takes Christians a long time to get over the shock and horror of this.
00:10:46.920
It's really notable that, through the early centuries, Christians do feel, yeah, this is embarrassing.
00:10:54.640
I mean, they continue to feel unsettled by it. And even once Constantine has become a Christian,
00:11:03.260
and the Roman Empire starts to become institutionally Christianized, this sense of embarrassment remains.
00:11:10.400
I think you say in the book, this is a fact that had never occurred to me to even wonder about,
00:11:14.900
but it took some centuries before the depiction of Christ on the cross became really admissible.
00:11:23.880
Right. So, I mean, one of the earliest ones that is done by, so there's a very early one that is
00:11:29.620
done by someone mocking Christianity. So it shows a man with an ass's head being crucified. It comes from
00:11:36.240
graffiti in Rome, and it's clearly mockery. One of the earliest illustrations by Christians comes on an
00:11:43.320
ivory box that's now in the British Museum, and it shows the passion. So on one side, you have Judas
00:11:49.380
being hanged and looking very unhappy about it. On the other side, you have Christ on the cross,
00:11:57.300
and he couldn't look more chilled. I mean, he looks, well, he looks like he's hanging out in California
00:12:02.580
on a beach. He's buff, he's toned, he's got a kind of loincloth on. And in fact, what he looks like,
00:12:08.540
of course, is an athlete who has won in a great contest, which is one of the ways that in the
00:12:14.000
Roman world, Christ's victory over death is understood. And it's not for another 500 years
00:12:19.860
after that, so just before the first millennium, that you get Christ portrayed as dead on the cross.
00:12:27.560
And then throughout the high Middle Ages, there is a very deep and intense fascination on the part
00:12:35.240
of Christians with the physical sufferings of Christ, with his passion. And then I think people,
00:12:42.820
artists and thinkers and writers in the Christian world push it to such a limit that almost they
00:12:50.660
become desensitised to it. And by the 19th century, when Nietzsche is writing, I think that most people
00:12:57.820
probably going into a church and looking at a cross are not thinking of it as an absolutely hideous
00:13:03.660
instrument of torture. And they're probably not visualising the appalling sufferings that a man
00:13:10.220
nailed to it would have undergone. And it's a kind of paradox, a very Nietzschean paradox,
00:13:17.600
that probably the most devastating, you know, to Christian faith, the most devastating atheist who's
00:13:24.180
ever written in the Christian tradition, Friedrich Nietzsche, should have felt the power of the cross
00:13:30.480
so profoundly. And he feels it as something disgusting. He feels it perhaps in the sense
00:13:36.740
that a Greek or Roman would. The idea that someone who had suffered such a servile fate could in any way
00:13:43.160
be worthy of approbation, let alone worship, appalls Nietzsche, because he sees it as an offence
00:13:50.500
against the values of strength and power and glory and beauty that he identifies in Greek and Roman
00:13:58.220
culture. And which, frankly, he thinks has been corrupted by Christianity, this faith of slaves,
00:14:04.780
as he describes it. And one of the reasons he describes it as the faith of slaves is because
00:14:08.800
crucifixion is the fate that is visited on slaves. And I, when I was writing Dominion, I was about two
00:14:17.600
chapters through, and then I got a commission to make this film that you mentioned in your introduction
00:14:22.600
about the Islamic State. And I ended up going to this town called Sinjar, which had been the home
00:14:30.140
of people called the Yazidis. I'm sure you'll know. I'm sure lots of people listening will know
00:14:33.880
people who were accused by the Islamic State, not just of being infidels, but of being devil worshippers,
00:14:40.800
and had been treated peculiarly horribly. And the women had been rounded up, and those who were thought
00:14:46.280
too ugly to take off as sex slaves had been killed, and those who hadn't had been taken off and sold
00:14:52.060
into sexual slavery. But the men, some of them had been crucified. And to be in a town that had been
00:14:59.560
liberated just a few weeks before by the Kurds, and the Islamic State were a couple of miles away from
00:15:04.560
where we were across kind of blank, open fields. To be in a town where people had suffered crucifixion
00:15:14.040
at the hands of people who viewed crucifixion as the Romans had viewed it, as a fate that it was not
00:15:20.820
just the right of the powerful to visit on the defeated, but a moral duty, I found kind of
00:15:28.020
existentially horrible. And I suppose it kind of opened my mind to the sense in which I think the idea
00:15:38.120
that someone who is tortured to death has a moral value over the person who tortures him to death,
00:15:44.980
underpins my moral system, and I think the moral system of the vast number of people in the West.
00:15:52.220
And I came back and I rewrote the introduction to the book to focus on the crucifixion as being the kind of
00:15:59.740
maddest, strangest, weirdest symbol that anyone in antiquity came up with. And it may not be a coincidence that
00:16:07.820
it is, of course, the most enduring symbol, probably the best known symbol maybe in world history.
00:16:14.700
Yeah. I mean, one thing you get from reading history, certainly reading Dominion, or your other,
00:16:22.300
I guess Rubicon conveys it too, your discussion of Rome, is just how foreign and, through a modern
00:16:31.140
lens, pathological the ethics of antiquity were, right? I mean, just, I think, is it Thucydides who
00:16:37.560
said that the strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must? Or some, that's probably close
00:16:45.240
A phrase that is being quoted a lot at the moment, it must be said.
00:16:48.440
And yeah, I mean, so you actually make that point in your documentary on the Islamic State,
00:16:54.300
as you're walking through Sinjar, that this was a promulgation of a Roman ethic, essentially. I mean,
00:17:00.920
I think you say something like they murdered these people very much the way, you know, the Roman legions
00:17:06.080
would have, or there's some line like that, direct comparison to Rome, which I found briefly shocking
00:17:11.660
because I realized I rarely view the Greeks and Romans through this lens of moral judgment,
00:17:21.900
the same kind of judgment I, I lavish upon jihadists, right? But yet there, there's something awful
00:17:29.660
about their, their ethics and their, their celebration of strength over weakness.
00:17:35.500
Well, I mean, that is a perspective that I would argue is shaped by 2,000 years of Christian weathering
00:17:42.460
because, I mean, Nietzsche certainly saw the morality of the Greeks and the Romans as, as something admirable,
00:17:50.060
as of course, in due course, did Hitler. But it's, it's, I mean, it's wrong to say that the Romans are,
00:17:56.060
are immoral. They, they weren't at all. They saw themselves as the most moral of peoples.
00:18:01.420
And this is why the gods had given them the rule of the world.
00:18:04.540
And also you read like the Stoic philosophers, right? And it's, you're, you're, you're in the
00:18:08.700
presence of some of the greatest wisdom philosophy has ever produced. And yet to know of, of the,
00:18:16.140
the normalcy of crucifixion occurring in the background is peculiar.
00:18:20.300
I mean, I think I, so as a child, I always found Greece and Rome infinitely more glamorous than,
00:18:29.900
than the, than the, than the Israelites and then the, and then the apostles. So I was always team
00:18:36.540
Pharaoh, team Nebuchadnezzar, team Pontius Pilate. I kind of thrilled to the glamour and the swagger
00:18:43.340
of Tyrannosaurus as an even younger child. And I guess that I was perfectly capable of being
00:18:55.180
thrilled and excited by the thought of the Spartans at Thermopylae or Caesar conquering Gaul. And I would
00:19:03.660
do that in part by also identifying my moral inheritance as something that derived from
00:19:09.980
Greek philosophy. But I guess that, um, one of the, uh, well, actually probably the main thing
00:19:16.300
that led me to write Dominion, a history of Christianity, which I had, had never been on
00:19:22.540
my agenda. I always viewed, I had a kind of almost synesthetic sense of antiquity. And I thought of
00:19:28.540
Greece and Rome as with bright blue Californian skies. And I thought of Christianity as, you know,
00:19:34.300
the drizzle of an English autumn setting in and blotting out the sun. But I realized as I wrote
00:19:42.700
about Caesar, who was hailed as a great man by his fellow citizens for inflicting hundreds of
00:19:50.300
thousands of casualties on and during the course of the conquest of Gaul, enslaving an equal number
00:19:56.460
and kind of exalting in it and realizing that this really wasn't my moral system at all.
00:20:02.780
Um, and I began, I felt it was kind of like, you know, I suppose the kind of the prickle in the back
00:20:08.540
of the throat that heralds the onset of a cold, the sense that, that something was kind of, that I had,
00:20:15.020
couldn't quite get a handle on was, was waiting to, to take me over. And I began to think, well,
00:20:21.660
is it actually Christianity that changes? Is that, is that what explains the, the, the process of
00:20:27.980
transformation? And I explored it in the third work of history I wrote, which was focused very much
00:20:34.300
on what I think is a kind of great process of revolution in 11th century Latin Christendom.
00:20:40.460
So the Western half of what had been the Roman empire. And it's often called the papal revolution
00:20:45.020
because the revolutionaries are people who take control of the Roman church and it's led by popes.
00:20:53.660
And it, it forces through a kind of very radical process of a recalibration of society that
00:21:02.060
essentially divides the world into rival spheres that in due course in the West is what, what we call
00:21:08.380
religion and the secular. And this is a, a division that did not exist in antiquity.
00:21:14.700
It didn't exist in any other of the civilizations of Eurasia. And I enjoyed the paradox that,
00:21:23.020
that secularism would not probably have been secularism without the labors of 11th century
00:21:30.220
popes. It seemed to be a very entertaining paradox. So I explored that. And then, and then on the back
00:21:35.900
of that, I then became interested in what was the role of Islam in all of this. And I wrote a book on
00:21:41.580
Islam where I was quite skeptical about, uh, quite a lot about early Islam. I, I, this is in the shadow
00:21:49.180
of the sword in the shadow of the sword. So it seemed to me that the great question about Islam is
00:21:55.340
where does the Quran come from? And it is amazing. The number of books by very distinguished scholars.
00:22:02.620
So it's not even kind of popular history who will say about the revelations Muhammad received
00:22:10.220
The Archangel Gabriel. That's the scholarly opinion of the academy.
00:22:14.460
They don't say that, but they, they might say he received the revelations and they leave it at
00:22:19.660
that. And I thought, well, that's not really an adequate explanation if you're not a Muslim. I mean,
00:22:25.180
if you're a Muslim, then of course it's perfectly adequate. I mean, you know, that's the foundation
00:22:28.620
of, of a Muslim's faith. But if you're not, you've got to say, where does it come from? And it did seem
00:22:32.940
to me that the Quran was, I mean, if the Quran had materialized in, I don't know, 15th century New
00:22:39.980
Zealand, I mean, that would be a miracle. It would be incredible. But the fact that it materializes
00:22:45.340
in a place that is rife with Jewish and Christian and Zoroastrian and Roman and Persian and all kinds
00:22:53.340
of cultural influences, and that this is exactly what it reflects, made me think that, that Islam was
00:23:00.220
a product of this, but one that had gone on a, you know, a radically different direction from,
00:23:05.820
from Christianity. And so, so thinking that and studying it and kind of reifying my thoughts
00:23:11.980
about how, what today we would call Judaism and Christianity and Islam and Zoroastrianism
00:23:17.500
were kind of related, but quite radically different in their presumptions, again, sharpened for me the
00:23:24.380
sense of what was distinctive about Christianity and my own sense of being very, very shaped by it.
00:23:33.740
And so that's how I then came to write Dominion. And Dominion was a process of stress testing that
00:23:38.860
theory, because when I began it, I wasn't entirely sure what conclusions I would, I would end up with.
00:23:44.940
Well, I want to get to Islam, as I said, but let's linger here on the connection that you argue for
00:23:51.340
between Christian ethics and secular ethics that many of us imagine to be, you know, quite denuded of
00:23:59.660
any, you know, propositional claim about the truth or necessity of Christianity. Someone like myself,
00:24:05.820
I moved through the world having various moral intuitions informed by just my own thought and
00:24:11.980
then just my collision with the history of ideas, whether it's Western philosophy or Eastern philosophy
00:24:16.540
or, or religions like Christianity. But that, that amalgam translates in my thinking into something
00:24:23.900
that is, has no necessary connection, certainly to Christianity. So let me just throw a few,
00:24:30.860
or try to create a few wrinkles in that picture. One is that, so when you take Christianity itself,
00:24:37.100
the early Christians, you know, from, from Jesus onward, first of all, they were, they were Jews.
00:24:42.060
If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe at
00:24:48.540
samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to all full length episodes of the Making Sense podcast.
00:24:54.860
The podcast is available to everyone through our scholarship program. So if you can't afford a
00:24:59.420
subscription, please request a free account on the website. The Making Sense podcast is ad free
00:25:05.180
and relies entirely on listener support. And you can subscribe now at samharris.org.