Making Sense - Sam Harris - June 02, 2025


#418 — A Future for Democrats


Episode Stats

Length

45 minutes

Words per Minute

177.08705

Word Count

8,094

Sentence Count

1

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

Richie Torres is the youngest elected official in America s largest city and the first black man to serve as a member of the United States congress. He is also the son of Puerto Rican immigrants, and he grew up in conditions of mold, mildew, leaks, and lead without consistent heat and hot water in the winter.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 i am here with richie torres richie thanks for joining me it's an honor to be here it's really
00:00:24.780 great to meet you finally i've seen i've seen footage and um you're that footage convinced
00:00:29.880 me that there was still some sanity in the democratic party which uh there were moments
00:00:34.540 there where it really seemed like there was none so uh thank you for existing first i fear the
00:00:38.920 mythology is more impressive than the reality no i don't i don't think so we're gonna we're gonna
00:00:43.200 get to the reality so just maybe you can summarize your background in politics how did you get here
00:00:48.640 and what is your situation now in politics i mean the starting point for me is the bronx
00:00:53.700 i was born and raised in the bronx uh spent all of my childhood in poverty i was raised by a single
00:01:00.120 mother who had to raise three of us on minimum wage which in the 1990s was four dollars and 25 cents an
00:01:05.500 hour and probably the most formative experience of my life was growing up in public housing which is
00:01:11.420 owned and operated by the government and in new york city public housing is so savagely starved the
00:01:17.000 funding that it has a capital need of 80 billion dollars and counting so like hundreds of thousands
00:01:22.600 of tenants i grew up in conditions of mold and mildew leaks and lead without consistent heat and
00:01:28.020 hot water in the winter and i got my start in politics as a tenant organizer because of my lived
00:01:34.520 experience in public housing and then at age 24 i took the leap of faith and ran for public office
00:01:39.720 i had no deep pockets no ties to the party machine but i just spent a whole year doing nothing but
00:01:45.240 knocking on doors i went into people's homes i heard their stories and i won my first campaign
00:01:51.020 on the strength of door-to-door face-to-face campaigning i became an elected official at
00:01:55.800 age 25 and what was that office uh new york city council yeah and so i served in the new york city
00:02:01.500 council for seven years before running for congress but about a decade before entering congress like i was
00:02:08.840 at the lowest point of my life i had dropped out of college i found myself struggling with depression
00:02:13.500 i even attempted to take my own life because i felt as if the world around me had collapsed
00:02:17.900 and underwent hospitalization and i never thought in my wildest dreams that i would have a fighting
00:02:23.860 chance to rebuild my life and a few years later become the youngest elected official in america's
00:02:28.920 largest city and then ultimately become a member of the united states congress so i have a story that's
00:02:35.000 highly unusual but i feel deeply american yeah yeah and what's your background what are your parents
00:02:40.800 so i was raised by a single mother but both of them were puerto rican my father was born in puerto rico
00:02:45.740 and my mother my family's my my mother's side has been here for three generations so what has there
00:02:51.660 been an evolution in your politics i mean we're going to talk about your your how you view the
00:02:57.360 democratic party and it's both its recent past and future but uh where did you start with your your
00:03:03.340 kind of your set of political intuitions i entered politics as a progressive never far left but
00:03:10.620 fundamentally progressive and then i've become more moderate over time although i will tell you the
00:03:16.540 meaning of progressivism back then it's quite different from what it has become what year again
00:03:22.740 remind me so i ran for office in 2013 and assumed office in 2014 right well 2014 is sort of the moment
00:03:30.320 where we approach the cliff of yeah whatever we want to call it wokeness identitarian moral hysteria i
00:03:36.680 mean there's there's a the the intersectionality piece that was i mean it was certainly on college
00:03:42.640 campuses that was a vibe shift yeah then so you were just you were like the last sane person to step
00:03:50.060 into politics and on left of center the world felt radically different back then it seemed to me that
00:03:56.540 social media was a far less powerful force then than it has become today now it's become the center of
00:04:01.680 our political universe but back in 2013 the progressive position on immigration was immigration
00:04:07.540 reform and then it became open borders back then the progressive position on public safety was criminal
00:04:13.700 justice reform and then it became abolish the police or defund the police or the progressive position on
00:04:19.580 israel back then was the two-state solution and now it's bds or globalize the intifada so over the
00:04:26.880 course of a decade i've i've had a front row seat to the radicalization of progressive politics
00:04:32.120 so how responsible do you hold the democrats to be for trump and trumpism i mean did that radicalization
00:04:43.180 deliver us into the hands of this increasingly grotesque counter argument certainly in 2024
00:04:50.380 i mean i feel like we in the democratic party swung the pendulum too far to the left you know
00:04:56.640 after the 2024 election i wrote on twitter you know donald trump has no greater friend than the
00:05:03.720 far left which has alienated growing numbers of americans with absurdities like latinx or free
00:05:09.680 palestine from the river to the sea yeah or defund the police are you here to tell us that that you
00:05:14.560 don't call yourself latinx no no no no i'm from the i'm i'm not aware of anyone in the bronx who uses
00:05:20.240 the term latinx no it's a term that's been imposed on us by the college educated elites but uh you know
00:05:26.600 occam's razor holds that the simplest explanation is almost always the best and the simple explanation
00:05:30.700 is that we lost because of inflation and immigration you know we saw the highest inflation in more than
00:05:36.700 four decades and we saw a catastrophic mismanagement of the migrant crisis who's impact how do you
00:05:42.660 interpret that i mean that that seemed to have been so obvious i mean that was just something that
00:05:48.660 was politically optically and the fact that anyone could just hold up a cell phone at the southern
00:05:53.440 border and it looked like a zombie movie how did the biden administration not make that a priority
00:06:00.800 immediately because the biden administration had become ideologically captured by the far left
00:06:06.700 you know trump said something that i thought was right during the presidential campaign he said that
00:06:12.480 every state had become a border state because the impact of the migrant crisis was felt not only
00:06:18.180 at the border but in cities like new york whose shelter system and municipal finances were completely
00:06:23.840 overwhelmed by an unprecedented wave of migration and i remember seeing a poll in december 2023
00:06:30.300 indicating that 85 percent of new yorkers had concerns about the impact of the migrant crisis yeah and so
00:06:36.900 the biden administration waited two and a half years before finally issuing an executive order
00:06:41.840 restricting migration at the border securing the border and by then it was too late the damage was done
00:06:47.500 the republicans had won the issue had effectively weaponized the issue against the democrats and i remember
00:06:53.840 seeing a poll indicating that the majority that the executive order had overwhelming support from the
00:06:59.780 american people from every racial category black and white latino and asian and so i asked myself if the
00:07:05.420 executive order was effective at restricting migration and if it was broadly popular then why did it take
00:07:11.700 the biden administration so long to issue the executive order and for me the reason is simple
00:07:16.540 he was pandering to the far left which has outsized power over the policy making and messaging of the
00:07:24.180 democratic party and that outsized power is causing us to fall out of touch with the majority of americans
00:07:30.060 particularly the working class yeah he took two and a half years to issue that executive order but
00:07:35.060 if memory serves something like two and a half hours to issue one on trans bathroom rights or whatever they
00:07:41.460 particular object was i mean i take your point about the um i think kamala harris's loss was
00:07:48.040 overdetermined but and and inflation and immigration were certainly the major bright lines there but
00:07:54.600 famously she was also a candidate who in the 11th hour of her campaign couldn't say something sensible
00:08:01.840 about taxpayer funded gender reassignment surgery for incarcerated undocumented immigrants it seems so
00:08:09.740 unnecessary to be that captured by the activist class in the party i don't know if there's more
00:08:15.140 to say about how we got there but having gotten there and having seen that it was fatal for the chances of
00:08:21.960 achieving the presidency do you think the pendulum is swinging back is there is there any chance in
00:08:27.080 your mind that we're going to spend the next four years wondering whether we or the next three years
00:08:32.460 wondering whether we need to attack further left as a democratic party it remains to be seen i feel
00:08:39.020 like there is a recognition that we went too far left on immigration but you know i i feel there needs
00:08:44.140 to be a fundamental restructuring within the democratic party a return to a rational center but you know i
00:08:50.440 worry that i mean donald trump is so aggressive that he is provoking a response yeah that is you know
00:08:58.080 there's a divide between what i would say two teams in the democratic party there's team restraint and
00:09:02.440 team resistance right there are those in team resistance who feel like we should react hysterically
00:09:06.980 to everything that donald trump says or does and then there are those who feel like we should pick and
00:09:12.320 choose our battles and be strategic but i worry that the momentum is on the side of hysterical
00:09:17.620 hyperbolic resistance and the enormous expenditure of time and energy and resistance might crowd out the
00:09:23.880 restructuring and moderation that needs to happen within the democratic party but even if
00:09:27.980 the resistance were turned up to 11 why would it have to find a center of gravity around
00:09:34.880 identitarian intersectional highly non-mainstream convictions and i could see becoming hysterical i
00:09:43.260 don't think hysteria is the best strategy but if you were to want to become hysterical you could
00:09:48.080 become hysterical over his corruption his incompetence the way in which he has done our country
00:09:54.520 just colossal brands damage on the world stage alienating allies and standing shoulder to
00:10:00.680 shoulder with autocrats i mean that's you could be as shrill as you want about that what concerns me is
00:10:07.120 the sense that there's still people in the party who think we didn't go far left enough right and that
00:10:13.380 we should figure out how to alienate you know every last person right of center in america do you think
00:10:19.680 that conviction is um still has many subscribers or is the pendulum swinging back on that point
00:10:25.300 i feel like there's a symbiotic relationship between the far left and the far right the far
00:10:30.760 left has no greater friend than the far right and the far right has no greater friend than the far
00:10:34.080 left it's newton's laws of physics right every action produces an equal and opposite reaction
00:10:37.900 and i feel like donald trump produces a reaction in the form of an emboldened far left
00:10:43.120 the far left had far less relevance under biden than it has in the present moment well so you are
00:10:50.360 among your many powers apart from just being eloquent and having your head screwed on straight
00:10:55.520 you because of your background i mean correct me if i'm wrong i would imagine you're almost like
00:11:01.240 kryptonite to the far left i mean you have as many intersectional points as one could want i mean i guess
00:11:08.100 you finally would have to change your gender to get to just to run the table um you're also gay
00:11:14.200 right okay so that's you've got that going for you i have almost as many intersecting identities as
00:11:19.520 george santos right yes right yes my running joke is after the expulsion of george santos i became the
00:11:24.860 most prominent jewish gay latino congressman from new york so i'm a category of one right yeah so
00:11:31.180 what does the far left do with you when you don't sing from their hymn book uh i think if i
00:11:39.440 if i were a white male i would be seen as the enemy but because i am black and latino and lgbtq and
00:11:48.340 from the bronx i'm seen not only as an enemy but as a traitor and there's a special hatred for
00:11:54.460 reserved for traitors so i feel like i'm a uniquely detested figure by the left
00:12:00.840 and so what does that translate into uh just in your efforts to govern i mean how do you
00:12:06.440 function with your other uh the other democrat prominent democrats who are you know some i mean
00:12:12.340 i guess aoc shares the bronx with you right yeah yeah how does that work i mean at the staff level we
00:12:17.640 have a cooperative relationship right so there are issues like capping the cross bronx expressway where
00:12:22.360 there's been collaboration um i have no personal relationship with aoc but but i i never take
00:12:27.440 politics personally like my view is even if we only agree on a subset of issues we should
00:12:33.120 collaborate wherever possible for the good of the country you know my concern is that politics has
00:12:37.880 become religiosity without religion and there are those on the far right and the far left who say
00:12:43.800 you know they alone have the absolute truth their policy prescriptions are the only path to salvation
00:12:49.080 and anyone who disagrees with them is not merely wrong but evil and should be crucified at the stake for
00:12:55.240 heresy and i feel like that kind of fundamentalism is incompatible with politics which is supposed to be
00:13:01.640 you know an alternative to conflict it's supposed to be a pragmatic enterprise yeah yeah so what can
00:13:09.540 congress do i mean as many of us spectate upon the um the unimaginable progress trump has made in
00:13:18.120 devaluing our country on some on on a level and in areas that i really many of us who were not
00:13:24.840 optimistic didn't anticipate i mean the idea that he would see some reason to cut 50 to 80 percent of
00:13:30.620 the you know the funding for basic scientific research in this country i mean it's like there's
00:13:35.440 just own goal after own goal what can a prostrate congress do and i mean we're simply just waiting for
00:13:43.120 to win the midterms is at the next point on the landscape that we have to reach before anything
00:13:47.900 useful can be done there's no sign of independence from congressional republicans i mean the republican
00:13:52.640 party has become a cult of personality around donald trump i've never seen a political figure who has
00:13:58.680 had as much an iron grip on a political party as he has on the republican party i mean he can wake up
00:14:04.100 one day and just by sheer force of will make the republican party the party of protectionism and price
00:14:10.120 controls yeah and i've seen democrats you know quoting ronald reagan and and milton friedman so
00:14:15.280 i feel like our political universe has been inverted but i worry that we're entering a period of decline
00:14:20.740 you know if a superpower were intent on planting the seeds of its own decline it would paralyze the
00:14:28.320 global economy with uncertainty it would erode confidence in the reserve status of the dollar
00:14:34.040 it would discard due process it would defund scientific and medical research it would
00:14:39.900 allow its manufacturing base to atrophy from neglect and it would grow the deficit until interest on the
00:14:46.080 debt becomes the largest share of the federal budget and that's the story of america under
00:14:50.640 donald trump and that to me is a story of decline i mean i worry about the future of america and i worry
00:14:56.440 about the impact of the reconciliation bill not only on the social safety net but on the fiscal health of
00:15:02.820 our nation it will add a staggering five trillion dollars to our national debt at a time when the debt
00:15:09.220 has not only been never been larger but also more expensive i mean most people do not realize that
00:15:15.160 interest on the debt has become the largest line item in the federal budget second only to social
00:15:21.620 security we spend more on debt on defense or medicare or medicaid and it is projected to ultimately
00:15:28.700 surpass social security so i think we're playing with fire so what can the democrats do
00:15:36.220 now i mean short of taking back congress is there anything what's happening among democrats in the
00:15:43.140 house and the senate now look we're exhausting every means of resisting donald trump in the courtroom
00:15:49.360 on the streets in the halls of congress but look there are limits to what you can do when republicans
00:15:55.560 control every branch of government yeah so ultimately there's no substitute for winning we have to win
00:16:00.440 elections but for me it's not enough to win because you know if we win in 2026 our victory could be as
00:16:08.440 much about the weakness of donald trump as it is about our own strength i feel like we have to
00:16:12.380 fundamentally transform the democratic party what does that look like in your view well actually more
00:16:18.640 important than restructuring the democratic party is restructuring democratic governance i feel like
00:16:23.720 there is a crisis of blue state and blue city governance yeah in cities like new york and chicago
00:16:28.780 you know no state saw a greater swing toward donald trump than new york and that to me was not a
00:16:35.440 coincidence that was a consequence of failing governance at the state and local level and so
00:16:40.500 i worry that misgovernance in blue states is actually creating an electoral challenge for the democratic
00:16:46.140 party you know in the next reapportionment there's going to be a massive shift of population and political
00:16:51.580 power from the north to the south from the midwest to the mountain west from the rust belt to the sun
00:16:57.520 belt uh the south is projected to gain as many as 11 electoral votes the northeast and the midwest could
00:17:04.360 lose as many as 11 electoral votes and so i feel like as a party you know we're going to have no choice
00:17:10.200 but to become a big 10 party that's going to be a necessity in order for us to compete in a much more
00:17:15.820 complicated electoral landscape so why are democratic cities and states so badly run i mean like if if we're on
00:17:24.100 the right side of most or any political arguments why is there so much dysfunction that serves as a
00:17:31.360 campaign commercial for the other side i have two diagnoses i think the problem with the democratic
00:17:37.380 party is that at times we're more responsive to interest groups than to people on the ground and
00:17:44.200 the problem with the progressive movement which has outsized power within the democratic party is that
00:17:49.700 it's more concerned with progressive purity than with actual progress than with the actual competence
00:17:54.520 and performance of government you know one of my frustrations as a member of congress is i feel like
00:17:59.920 federal governance has come to consist of blue state representatives like myself passing laws like
00:18:06.520 the inflation reduction act whose benefits overwhelmingly flow into red states like of the 20 congressional
00:18:13.100 districts receiving the most ira investment 19 of them are republican held because those are the
00:18:19.180 easiest places to do business those are the easiest places to build you know if you think about the ai
00:18:24.820 revolution leading to the proliferation of ai data centers where are those data centers going to be
00:18:29.180 cited it's not going to be cited in new york which closed indian point a nuclear plant facility
00:18:33.000 it's going to be cited in states like texas which have an abundance of energy i had a clean energy
00:18:37.940 developer tell me that it is easier for him to create clean energy infrastructure in texas than
00:18:43.160 in new york in states that deny climate change than in the states that consider it an emergency
00:18:47.980 yeah and so there is a crisis of blue state governance that we have to come to grips with
00:18:52.500 is this of a piece which with what is now being called the abundance agenda in democratic circles
00:18:59.160 so i'm a strong proponent of the abundance movement and for me abundance is the best framework
00:19:05.680 for reimagining what it means to govern progressively to govern as a democratic party
00:19:11.340 you know if the republican party is going to be the party of less government then we as democrats
00:19:16.880 should not be the party of more government we should be the party of better cheaper and faster
00:19:20.960 government right a government that builds a government that works and you know progress is
00:19:25.980 measured not only by more spending but by more supply like for me what matters is not only whether
00:19:32.400 there's more or less housing spending but whether there's more or less housing supply like are we
00:19:37.180 pursuing policies that expand the supply of housing are we contracting it are we making housing more
00:19:42.540 abundant and affordable are we making it more scarce and unaffordable and it's often the case that in
00:19:47.680 blue cities and blue states we're pursuing policies that actually contract the supply of fundamental
00:19:53.540 public goods that we need and want yeah it seems like the variable of competence should be
00:19:59.600 is undervalued versionally the target when one thing that's on display with trump and trumpism
00:20:06.140 leaving the the verbiage aside is colossal corruption and incompetence right and if you oppose both of
00:20:13.900 those things you it seems like you're on the winning side of two very important arguments and none of
00:20:19.760 that requires a an approach to you know civil rights that in martin luther king wouldn't recognize or
00:20:26.440 or any of the other sinkholes of confusion that democrats have fallen into i mean we're going to
00:20:32.040 get to october 7th and the anti-semitism that has exploded left of center but can i comment on that
00:20:38.340 because i feel like abundance is a fancy word for competence right and it just feels to me our
00:20:44.860 politics values ideological purity more than competence competence has become the most undervalued
00:20:50.340 virtue but you know the the american people have a clear pattern of punishing incompetence you know
00:20:58.300 when when when donald trump was incompetent in managing the response to covid he lost the presidential
00:21:04.360 election in 2020 when we as democrats were incompetent in managing the migrant crisis the
00:21:10.660 democratic nominee lost the election in 2024 you know when george bush sloppily with uh sloppily uh
00:21:16.940 mismanaged the response to katrina you know his poll numbers never recovered and you might recall when
00:21:23.140 biden sloppily withdrew from afghanistan his poll numbers never recovered so i feel like the clear
00:21:29.360 lesson here is that the american people value competence demand it and punishing competence and
00:21:35.480 there's this common refrain that you know we have a messaging problem we did not have a messaging problem
00:21:41.440 we had a reality problem inflation was a reality the migrant crisis was a reality and so i i just hope
00:21:49.260 that we're not only focused on improving our messaging but also improving how we govern okay so let's talk
00:21:55.020 about some very errant messaging post october 7th literally before israel had done anything in response
00:22:04.400 we had an explosion of uh it's not too far to say it explicit support for the death cult that had
00:22:13.660 murdered 1200 people in israel on october 7th and this support was in the quads of our finest universities
00:22:23.140 we we we know that it was um it was not an accident it was not purely organic but obviously the the
00:22:30.860 sympathy was there to be leveraged by people taking to social media and in many cases you know directly
00:22:38.100 funding protests we definitely have an anti-semitism problem there's an anti-semitism problem on the far
00:22:43.260 right obviously and that's been with us forever but there's one on the far left which is um increasingly
00:22:50.180 shrill and increasingly hard for otherwise sane and ethical people to parse it's understandable given the
00:22:58.140 level of misinformation and disinformation spread on this topic it's it's understandable that people
00:23:04.140 are confused about what's happening there and about what israel could be doing or should be doing but
00:23:09.500 the clear dissection of the depth of the confusion happened on october 8th before israel had done
00:23:16.220 anything in response we saw this explosion of support for you know hamas essentially as a legitimate
00:23:23.580 resistance organization right throwing off an occupation in gaza that hadn't been occupied for
00:23:29.580 you know a decade and a half what do you make of the animus toward israel and the and just the
00:23:35.820 animus toward jews left of center in our politics now for me october 7th did not change the state of
00:23:43.420 anti-semitism it simply revealed a process that had been unfolding for a long time a process of demonizing
00:23:51.100 both the jewish people and the jewish state and to your point almost as troubling as october 7th itself
00:23:58.540 was the response on october 8th i saw masses of americans go to the heart of times square the most jewish
00:24:06.380 city in the world and celebrate and cheer the mass murder of jews you know i never thought as as
00:24:14.780 as a millennial who remembers the trauma of 9-11 i never thought in my wildest nightmares that osama
00:24:21.820 bin laden's letter to america would be spreading virally on tiktok and you know there's no single
00:24:28.460 explanation for what is unfolding in our politics but it seems to me the most one of the most influential
00:24:35.260 ideas on the far left on college campuses is the idea of intersectionality which seems to divide the
00:24:41.980 world into two categories the oppressor versus the oppressed and israel is seen as the oppressor that
00:24:47.980 can do no right and hamas is seen as the oppressed that can do no wrong and that seems to be the
00:24:53.420 distorting simplistic lens through which the war in gaza is seen through which the israeli palestinian
00:24:59.980 conflict is seen and it has deprived the whole generation of americans of the ability to empathize
00:25:07.100 with israelis who were victims of the deadliest day for jews since the holocaust yeah i guess
00:25:13.340 there's some doubt as to whether or not the holocaust even happened in certain circles i mean now we have
00:25:17.500 some of the biggest podcasts on earth platform people who are just asking questions about what
00:25:23.100 happened in 1941 and 42 and maybe hitler wasn't such a bad guy after all and maybe they just accidentally
00:25:29.260 killed jews or killed them out of compassion because there were so many prisoners of war they
00:25:33.260 just couldn't figure out what to do with them and wouldn't it might not be more compassionate to
00:25:37.260 euthanize them rather than have them starve and this is the kind of thing that is
00:25:41.020 tucker carlson's favorite history yeah this is yeah this is tucker carlson's favorite historian and one of
00:25:45.580 joe rogan's favorite historians who said that the central villain of world war ii was not adolf
00:25:49.580 hitler was winston churchill yeah yeah which would have been unsayable only a few years ago
00:25:55.180 and it shows how corroded our culture has become by anti-semitism both on the far right and on the
00:26:01.020 far left but to your point the far left anti-semitism enjoys greater respectability
00:26:05.900 right in american culture in american media and american education and i find it ironic that the
00:26:11.580 academic intelligentsia often has the least amount of moral intelligence and that point was driven home
00:26:17.260 to me during one of the congressional hearings you might recall one of my colleagues asked the
00:26:22.220 presidents of elite universities you know is calling for a genocide of jews harassment now
00:26:27.180 i'm from the bronx i represent a district where the median level of educational attainment is less
00:26:31.820 than a college degree but if you ask the average bronxite you know is calling for a genocide of jews
00:26:37.260 harassment they would say of course it is it's worse than harassment but if you ask an academic
00:26:43.500 you get a coldly legalistic formulaic response and it seems to me the loss of moral common
00:26:49.980 sense is not a bug but a feature of what the higher education industrial complex has become
00:26:55.900 yeah i mean i have a um i must say when i watch those hearings i had some sympathy for the college
00:27:01.420 presence because i do think that the the appropriate norm on a college campus is to be able to talk about
00:27:08.700 anything right as long as you're just talking i think you should be able to say anything and then
00:27:13.020 reap the reputational consequences of having advocated that idea but what was happening on the campuses
00:27:19.180 was quite a bit more than talk can i challenge that actually because i i that's a that's a fair
00:27:24.140 rule but then enforce it yeah even handedly that's that was the thing that was the lack of neutrality
00:27:28.860 and enforcement yeah amounts to viewpoint discrimination yeah which to me is the opposite of academic freedom
00:27:35.020 we know what would have happened had anyone been calling for the lynching of black people or trans
00:27:40.380 people on if there were a kkk encampment it would have been shut if you misgendered someone you would
00:27:46.060 have been fired and canceled in a heartbeat transgendered kkk members would have been bulletproof
00:27:51.420 so the selective enforcement of the rules i think is what i find most unsettling yeah like you can have
00:27:57.260 whatever rule you wish but enforce it evenly right right and clearly for the purposes of a college campus
00:28:04.060 one rule is that you shouldn't be able to shut down the the functioning of a campus you shouldn't
00:28:09.500 be able to shout so that no no one can be heard from the stage or cancel classes or you know we we need
00:28:15.660 to be able to educate the kids who are paying to get educated there there's a misconception about the
00:28:20.860 first amendment yeah like the first amendment protects speech not conduct there's no first
00:28:25.660 member right to erect an encampment or blockade a building exactly or harass and intimidate jews on college campus
00:28:32.700 yeah like that's not speech protected by the constitution that's conduct right that violates
00:28:37.100 out of the law university policy yeah yeah so it's it's the double standard that was that everyone
00:28:43.100 noticed that was um so infuriating there why doesn't that just end the argument i mean every no one can
00:28:49.340 deny that had trans people been treated that way at columbia or harvard or black people or pick any other
00:28:58.220 intersectional identity you you want no one can deny that a very different moral immune system
00:29:05.340 would have come online at the level of the administration but because it's the jews everyone
00:29:10.300 had to kind of go go back to their their manual and and try to split hairs and figure out okay how do we
00:29:16.140 respond to this situation but that's the i think the point about intersectionality and once you
00:29:21.180 categorize jews as an oppressor or white privilege privilege class yeah then you're declaring them
00:29:27.580 fair game for discrimination discrimination that would never be tolerated against any other minority in
00:29:32.620 our society yeah how did the jews become a privileged class when still within living memory nearly half of
00:29:40.780 them were exterminated in ovens in europe i mean how did how how is this uh for as long as anyone's been
00:29:48.620 paying attention certainly you look at you look at fbi hate crime statistics since 9 11 every year
00:29:54.860 since 9 11 even in the immediate aftermath of 9 11 when islamist terrorists brought down the twin towers
00:30:01.180 you had more hate crimes against jews in america than any other group how does this um notion that they're
00:30:08.780 at the top of the oppressor class get so secured in left of center circles i think one there's a long
00:30:17.180 history of scapegoating and fear mongering against jews i mean jews have often been a convenient target
00:30:24.540 for scapegoating but you know i think much of it is simply indoctrination i worry that our social media
00:30:33.100 platforms and our college campuses are indoctrinating the next generation of americans not only with a
00:30:39.100 hatred for israel but also a hatred for their own country yeah or a hatred for the west and i'm not
00:30:45.020 aware of a civilization in human history that has ever succeeded on the strength of self-loathing
00:30:50.300 like a society that no longer believes in itself will not long endure and i have found that there's
00:30:55.580 often a disconnect between how an immigrant sees america and how a native-born gen z-er might see america
00:31:02.620 and i'm overgeneralizing but i feel like there's a kernel of truth here you know an immigrant sees
00:31:06.460 america and sees a land of opportunity whereas a member of gen z will see america and see nothing but a
00:31:12.540 system of oppression nothing but racism and sexism and xenophobia and look there's certainly a danger
00:31:22.220 in excessive nationalism but there's also a danger in in a deficit like every civilization needs some
00:31:29.580 degree of self-love and i feel like we have a culture of self-loathing in the west um you know one
00:31:35.580 thing i found inspiring about the israeli left is before october 7th during the passionate debates
00:31:41.740 about judicial reform you had a mass mobilization of israelis largely from the left protesting the
00:31:48.300 judicial reforms and i found it striking that there were israelis who were singing the israeli
00:31:53.500 anthem hak tikvah and waving the israeli flag and proudly proclaiming their israeli patriotism and i
00:32:00.220 feel like that's such a stark contrast to what we see from the american left where you have leftists
00:32:06.620 burning the american flag or denigrating the united states and i feel like the i wish the american left
00:32:13.740 would embrace the patriotism of the israeli left and my hope is that i can represent a patriotic
00:32:20.780 liberalism within the democratic party because i feel like one of our miscalculations is ceding the value
00:32:26.780 of patriotism and american exceptionalism to the political right yeah well yeah we have an opportunity
00:32:32.620 to get that straight with the uh 250th anniversary of the of the country coming up here next year that
00:32:40.700 will really be a um depressing sacrilege if the centennial there becomes just a mega you know triumphal
00:32:49.020 story with the left whinging in a way that just can't find a patriotic lane and we need we need
00:32:56.140 left of center patriotism otherwise uh yeah it's not yet another own goal um and donald trump has no
00:33:02.940 love for america no he loves no one but himself that's pretty clear the ideology of the republican
00:33:08.780 party is no longer conservatism it's trumpism yeah and he has contempt for the democratic institutions
00:33:15.740 that have sustained what i would consider to be the greatest experiment in democracy the world has ever
00:33:21.100 seen yeah and i feel like the democratic party is uniquely positioned to affirm the exceptionalism of
00:33:27.580 america as a multi-racial multi-ethnic expansive democracy the likes of which the world has never
00:33:33.260 seen well i love that aspiration uh between us and that happy day i see a few roadblocks we have to
00:33:41.340 dream yeah what one is there's a lot of energy aimed at aoc and bernie at the moment in the democratic
00:33:49.020 party or at least as you know it seems to be so judging from reading the new york times it strikes
00:33:54.300 me as uh highly unlikely that that's the future of the party that's going to deliver the vision you just
00:34:01.500 articulated i wonder if you share that sense i mean i the strand of of truth that i think has to be
00:34:07.100 addressed in the kind of platform they articulate is the problem of wealth inequality i think that's
00:34:12.460 just that is a problem and any sane and compassionate governance would want to address it but a descent
00:34:19.740 into our own populism that fails to purge this anti-american you know even anti-western civilization
00:34:28.300 strand of leftism i think is going to be a disaster for us i mean perhaps give me your thoughts on on
00:34:34.620 wealth inequality and the shadow it's casting over our society now but how do we deal with that and
00:34:40.940 still find our way to this goal of a patriotic and um you know a celebration of what is possible once
00:34:49.260 we become no longer ideological but merely competent and sane look for me the single greatest challenge
00:34:56.140 confronting america is the affordability crisis you know in new york about one-fifth of the young black
00:35:03.580 population has disappeared you know in the early 20th century african americans fled the south of
00:35:09.500 the north in order to escape jim crow and now we see african americans escaping the north of the south
00:35:15.420 in order to escape the affordability crisis and even though consumer goods like computers have become
00:35:21.900 dramatically more affordable and more abundant over time the fundamentals of human flourishing like
00:35:27.660 higher education and health care and housing have become unaffordable and scarce over time and i feel
00:35:33.980 like the central project of the democratic party should be to address the affordability crisis
00:35:39.100 that is immiserating the american working class i mean that's where we're feeling most miserably
00:35:43.980 so i think about it i mean wealth inequality is a real challenge but i think about it as an affordability
00:35:49.100 crisis do you think if we address and that's what's radicalizing the next generation right because and
00:35:57.020 i've been for good reason you know if you spend a hundred thousand dollars to go to college maybe even
00:36:02.620 more and you find yourself unemployed or underemployed you're going to feel bitterly disillusioned with
00:36:08.140 the system if you're struggling to keep pace with the crushing cost of housing and health care and
00:36:13.100 higher education and the inflation in these areas is out of control you know the promise of america is
00:36:19.580 supposed to be if you work hard and play by the rules then you will have access to a decent life
00:36:24.300 well there are people in america who are working hard who are playing by the rules and who are not
00:36:29.180 only working poor but working homeless like the majority of household heads in the new york shelter system
00:36:35.820 are working people right how much of the problem of race or the apparent problem of race or
00:36:42.060 racial inequality is a problem of class do you think i feel like the two are inextricably bound
00:36:48.940 together and if i were setting the agenda for the democratic party i would focus more heavily on class
00:36:55.180 i feel like we in the democratic party should be defined not by identities but by ideas and we should
00:37:01.100 speak not in the language of three-letter acronyms like crt and dei and esg we should speak in the language
00:37:07.980 of opportunity opportunity for every american we should give every american a fighting chance
00:37:12.540 at the american dream at a decent life that to me is a unifying message that will broaden the democratic
00:37:18.620 coalition so if you were going to reset the approach to dei or affirmative action is there an approach
00:37:25.340 that focuses on class exclusively economic disadvantage exclusively that you think solves the problems we
00:37:32.940 want to solve or is there some more to the apparatus that we need so i'll take one example on workforce
00:37:39.420 development and education i feel like in america we have a cultural obsession with the baccalaureate
00:37:45.340 and we should rethink the notion that everyone must go to a four-year college and learn shakespeare
00:37:50.940 and then enter the workforce like there's a significant subset of our population that prefers
00:37:56.540 vocational schooling career and technical education and instead of imposing a one-size-fits-all model
00:38:01.820 on everyone why not allow people the freedom and flexibility to choose the path that's right for
00:38:06.860 them why not allow people to bring a pell grant not only to a four-year college but to a union
00:38:11.740 apprenticeship you know i there's a quote from john gardner who served in the lyndon johnson
00:38:16.300 administration and i might be misremembering the quote but he said a society that exalts mediocre
00:38:22.380 philosophy but devalues excellent plumbing will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy
00:38:27.660 neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water and that that encapsulates what i believe but for
00:38:33.820 me there's nothing more corrosive to a society than structural unemployment and i've seen people in my
00:38:39.180 district who will go to college drop out and end up not with a degree but with debt and become
00:38:45.820 structurally unemployed and when you're structurally unemployed you're much more susceptible to contact
00:38:50.460 with the criminal justice system deaths of despair substance abuse mental illness what's been
00:38:56.460 described as the disappearance of work i feel like that's the central pathology that we should be
00:39:01.340 confronting and we should restructure and reimagine higher education and workforce development in
00:39:06.060 america to the benefit of the working class yeah well ai is going to be making that even more
00:39:12.620 interesting to navigate in in the coming years although the irony of ai is that it actually might
00:39:17.260 bring more dislocation to white collar yeah oh yeah exactly yeah that's what i'm saying yeah all
00:39:21.740 these people who read their shakespeare yeah are going to uh but originally it was projected that
00:39:26.620 all these truck drivers right would lose their employment no and instead i think we're going to
00:39:31.900 live in a world where the diagnostic capabilities of a doctor yeah are more replaceable than the
00:39:36.940 social emotional skills of a nurse yeah yeah no i think that's coming faster than anyone thought even
00:39:43.340 a few years ago are you optimistic or pessimistic about yeah i'm pessimistic about on at least two fronts
00:39:48.620 i'm pessimistic about our ability to even in success not exacerbate the kinds of problems we've been
00:39:56.460 talking about right i mean i think we're totally capable of leaving aside the problem of building
00:40:01.420 ai that is aligned with our interests and and may yet just kill us or ai that's not aligned with our
00:40:06.780 interests and may yet kill us even if we built it perfectly so that we could use it however we wanted
00:40:10.940 to and without any loss of control i think we're still capable of not understanding the political
00:40:19.100 and economic changes that this is going to force on us and we'll be celebrating a handful of trillionaires
00:40:25.020 you know in the pages of our business magazines as unemployment skyrockets and we just can't figure
00:40:30.460 out how to spread the wealth around which is to say that if we anticipate building it safely which is by no
00:40:36.700 means guaranteed or by some accounts even likely at this point we have to see that even safe ai
00:40:43.500 that's just kind of pulling wealth out of the ether is something that we could disastrously misuse
00:40:49.900 because we have we haven't anticipated the political and economic consequences of it it simply has to be
00:40:55.500 a tide that raises all boats and you know that's that's gonna sound like communism to half the country
00:41:00.460 and um it shouldn't because if you know we just we can't have uh i mean what is the end game you
00:41:07.340 know trillionaires uh with their uh you know building compounds in new zealand and and uh it's just a um
00:41:14.300 i mean it could be the greatest force for inequality the world has ever seen if we don't play our cards
00:41:19.340 right and be it behind all that there's the genuine concern that we're just in an arms race with china and
00:41:25.660 other bad actors and that this is it's like nuclear proliferation if if nukes were easily copied you
00:41:33.020 know and didn't require any rare materials to be created so it's uh it's in some ways scarier than
00:41:39.580 that and i suspect ai is much more susceptible to proliferation than nuclear weapons yeah exactly yeah
00:41:45.020 and it's just um look i i i'm not sure what to make of what will become of the ai revolution i'm i'm
00:41:50.540 hopeful that it could be a net good for humanity i feel like technology has been
00:41:54.380 yeah the greatest catalyst for human progress and look pessimism about technology apocalyptic
00:41:59.900 fears of what technology will bring is almost as old as humanity itself like if i if i remember my
00:42:05.500 plato dialogues correctly even socrates feared that the advent of writing yeah would mean the
00:42:10.300 end of human intelligence yeah and i think it's fair to say right it's a net benefit for humanity so
00:42:15.340 yeah no i mean i do think this is a fundamentally different breakthrough technologically and i'm
00:42:21.580 convinced we will see its implications relatively soon but um and it's a level of exponential
00:42:27.740 progress we've never seen yeah yeah but it is just it's humbling to realize that even the good version
00:42:35.020 poses problems that we will find difficult to navigate speaking of the future maybe hopefully
00:42:41.260 nearer term than the rise of super intelligence yeah malicious or otherwise what are your thoughts about
00:42:47.340 2028 what's uh is it indecent to ask you who should be running who should who in the democratic party
00:42:55.100 stands a chance of being a viable candidate at this point well naturally i have a preference for
00:43:00.780 center-left candidates and i tend to have a bias toward executives so i feel like our greatest bench of
00:43:06.940 talent is in the governorships but i've you know i'm impressed with governors like westmore josh
00:43:13.260 shapiro um i do feel like we have a wealth of talent at the gubernatorial level and then mayor pete
00:43:19.180 is just one of the most gifted communicators in the democratic party yeah so um i feel like we have
00:43:24.460 a stronger bench than people realize well richie i know you have a plan to catch is there anything we
00:43:28.780 haven't touched that you think we should cover in the remaining time no that's that's uh i we've done
00:43:36.220 i i feel like but post-mortem i think we we in the democratic party and those of us on the rational
00:43:42.460 left need to be more comfortable pushing back against more relativism and speaking with moral
00:43:49.180 clarity and defending america and defending western civilization which is worth defending
00:43:54.540 because i do feel like we live in an age of moral confusion yeah you know if you're speaking of
00:43:59.180 israel if you're an arab woman in the middle east and if you're born in israel you know you could rise to
00:44:05.180 the highest echelons of israeli society you could become a member of the knesset you could become
00:44:09.180 a member of the israeli supreme court you could be the judge that puts the prime minister in prison
00:44:13.740 whereas if you're born in afghanistan you will have acid thrown in your face for daring to be literate
00:44:20.220 and anyone who fails to see the fundamental moral difference between those two realities is profoundly
00:44:26.780 morally confused and i feel like those of us on the rational left should be at the forefront
00:44:32.060 of combating that kind of moral idealism and confusion that was uh better than i could have
00:44:38.940 ever hoped anyone would say it i mean i i would say that anyone who can't sign on the dotted line
00:44:44.780 there and see the implications of what you just said just that it's just obvious that there are
00:44:49.820 right and wrong answers or better and worse answers to fundamental questions of human flourishing
00:44:54.460 i just think there's no future in our politics for an orientation that that can't thread that needle
00:45:02.300 that you just effortlessly threaded there and yet it's as we push left of center it becomes harder and
00:45:09.260 harder to have that conversation on half a dozen fronts well richie there's no uh alternative but to
00:45:15.660 to see you more and more part of the conversation so thank you for what you're doing thank you for
00:45:20.220 coming out here and it's good great to get you on the podcast it's an honor to be here
00:45:42.300 you